SHORT COMMUNICATIONS Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 DOI: 10.46265/genresj.ETES2274 https://www.genresj.org ISSN: 2708-3764 Wild relatives of fruit trees in Syria: Genetic resources threatened by conflict Munzer Aldarvish *,a, Anas Al Kaddour b, Akram Bourgol c, Yasser Ramazand, Yousef Hallak e, Stephen Cavers f and Joan Cottrell g a Aleppo University and Agriculture Research Centre, Syria b Aleppo University and General Organization for Seed Multiplication, Syria c General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research, Syria d Plant Protection Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Syria e Ministry of Agriculture, Syria f UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, EH26 0QB, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom g Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, EH25 9SY, Midlothian, United Kingdom Abstract: Wild relatives of fruit trees (WRFT) are highly valued for food and tradable products by rural communities, especially in low-income countries and as such are a vital resource for tree improvement. During periods of conflict, a lack of support and protection by national authorities may make WRFT vulnerable. In Syria, WRFT are at risk of extinction due to the ongoing crisis, which has limited efforts to conserve and propagate these unique genetic resources. We collected information about the current status and key threats to WRFT in northwest Syria from 50 agricultural experts using structured interviews. Our results show that many sites have experienced erosion, overgrazing and drought. To initiate in situ and ex situ conservation, the locations of WRFT exposed to deterioration were identified and mapped using GPS, and seeds from five genotypes per species were collected from each of ten species to be used for the establishment of an in situ and ex situ WRFT collection. Keywords: Conservation of wild fruit plants, In situ conservation, Plant Genetic Resources, Genetic Erosion, Crop wild relatives Citation: Aldarvish, M., Al Kaddour, A., Bourgol, A., Ramazan, Y., Hallak, Y., Cavers, S., Cottrell, J. (2023). Wild relatives of fruit trees in Syria: Genetic resources threatened by conflict. Genetic Resources 4 (7), 68–75. doi: 10.46265/genresj.ETES2274. © Copyright 2023 the Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Ensuring future global food security is one of the biggest challenges facing humans today. One in nine people worldwide already suffers from poor access to food resources (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2015), and with predicted human population growth, pressure on food resources is likely to increase dramatically (Godfray et al, 2010; UN DESA, 2015). New high-yielding varieties of crops that can withstand adverse climatic conditions and new pests and diseases are urgently needed (McCouch et al, 2013). All cultivated crops derive from historic human domestication of wild ∗Corresponding author: Munzer Aldarvish (drgeneral2015@yahoo.com) genotypes, which have been gradually selected to produce commercial varieties (Engels and Thormann, 2020). Crop wild relatives are the wild original sources of these modern cultivars and remain the primary resource of genetic diversity for breeding new, climate- change tolerant, and higher-yielding cultivars (Maxted and Kell, 2009; Vincent et al, 2019). As such, it is vital to ensure wild relatives are identified, protected and propagated to help secure the future of the species we depend on. Globally, fruit trees are of enormous economic importance. In many places (Ercişli et al, 2009; Otieno, 2017), the wild relatives of fruit trees (WRFT) remain essential sources of food and medicines (Symphorien et al, 2016) but also provide feed for domestic animals and food additives. They also play a crucial Received: 14.11.2022 Accepted: 15.05.2023 Published online: 08.07.2023 https://www.genresj.org https://www.dx.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.ETES2274 https://www.genresj.org https://www.dx.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.ETES2274 mailto:drgeneral2015@yahoo.com Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Threats to fruit tree wild relatives in Syria 69 role in maintaining ecological diversity (Musayev and Huseynova, 2016). Notably, some of these wild relatives are known to possess traits that could greatly benefit contemporary agriculture through the breeding of new, improved cultivars. For example, wild genotypes of species in the genus Prunus are characterized by adaptation to extreme climatic conditions (Uğur and Gündeşli, 2020). Moreover, wild fruit tree genotypes are an essential source of resilient rootstock, as grafting is one of the key methods for making new fruit varieties available to growers (Zhebentyayeva et al, 2019). Several wild edible fruits are used by rural and tribal populations and significantly contribute to their livelihood. The use of non-cultivated foods, of which wild fruits form a part, as a dietary supplement or as a coping mechanism in times of food shortage, provides an important safety net for the rural poor, especially in low-income countries (Ercişli and Sagbas, 2017). The term underutilized and neglected species refers to a category of wild and cultivated plant species char- acterized by a low level of investment in research and development, and a recognized but untapped livelihood potential (Eyzaguirre et al, 1998). Widespread genetic erosion of these species has been recorded worldwide: for example, in Nepal, more than half of the tradi- tional landraces have become absent from the farmer’s fields (Paudel et al, 2016). Generally, despite several initiatives in recent years aimed at the conservation of such genetic resources, these wild relatives are still at risk of erosion or extinction (Pilling et al, 2020). They have been almost entirely neglected in ex situ genebanks (Castañeda-Álvarez et al, 2016), although some efforts to change this have begun (Dempewolf et al, 2013). In addition, current in situ reserves often do not meet the required management standards to main- tain the wild relatives and their genetic diversity for long-term use (Iriondo et al, 2012; Weibull and Phillips, 2020). Syria lies within a region of substantial topographic and climatic diversity in the Fertile Crescent, which is the centre of origin and domestication of many globally important crops. Syria is rich in agrobiodiversity (food, forage crops and fruit trees) like wheat, barley, lentils, chickpeas, vetch, olives, almonds, pear, plums, medic, clover, as well as other ornamental, medicinal and aromatic plants. Such plants are the main stocks and heritage for farming in Syria and are widely used elsewhere in the world. According to the Fourth National Report on Biodiversity in Syria (MSEA, 2009), the reduction in plant genetic resources was caused by urbanization, climate change, decreasing rainfall and increasing temperatures in dry seasons, which the region has experienced in the last seven years. An increasing incidence of wildfires also poses a particular threat. During the conflict period from 2012 to 2019, Syria lost 20.4% of its tree cover (Gaafar, 2021), much of it in Idlib and Lattakia governorates. The depletion of wild tree populations has been associated with several factors related to the conflict, including intense reliance on trees for heating and shelter, frequent fires in wild forests, charcoal production, illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and the weakness of state institutions in protecting natural resources and in managing environmental development. The losses of wild tree species include the cherry Prunus mahaleb, oak trees, wild pines and hundreds of other plant (tree and crop) species are also threatened. Unfortunately, there is no data available about the current situation of the WRFT, the only available data were published by FAO (1996), which clearly mentioned the deterioration of plant genetic resources in Syria started before the crisis. It can be assumed that the deterioration of WRFT has increased following the ongoing crisis in Syria resulting from the absence of any control for the protection of these genotypes against the deterioration. Moreover, there was clear evidence of plant genetic resources decline in northwest (NW) Syria based on the finding of previous research about crop landraces in the same locations in NW Syria (AlDarvish et al, 2022) The primary causes were the spread of cultivation to new areas, the need to grow economic crops, particularly cereals, forages and food legumes, and accidental forest fires (FAO, 1996; AlDarvish et al, 2022). Hence the WRFT were already facing extinction before the Syrian crisis began. Since then, the absence of research authorities responsible for the conservation and propagation of genetic resources has severely exacerbated the problem. Currently, no conservation activity is occurring as the conflict is preventing any access to the field by Syrian botanists, in particular in mountain areas where the threat from mines and bombs is severe (Valderrabano et al, 2018). As a first step towards addressing the lack of activity on these vital global resources, this study aimed to: i) collect information about the current status and critical threats to ten species of WRFT in NW Syria, ii) characterize and map the locations of WRFT exposed to deterioration, and iii) collect seed from multiple genotypes of each species to be used for the establishment of an in situ and ex situ WRFT collection. Materials and methods Data collection and analysis The National Strategy for Conservation and Man- agement of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2015–2035 (FAO, 2015) directs national actions for WRFT in Syria, and our methods were designed to address these goals using guidelines rec- ommended by Valderrabano et al (2018). The study was conducted between September 2021 and Febru- ary 2022 in Idleb Governorate (Ehsem, Mhambal, Jisr- Ash-Shugur, Badama, Darkosh, Janudiyeh, Harim, Dana, Kafr Takharim, Qourqeena, Armanaz subdistricts). This region is located within Syria’s second and third agroe- cological zones, incorporating mountains and plains. Agroecological zone 2 covers 2,473,000 ha (13.4% of the country) with an annual rainfall of 250 to 350mm 70 Aldarvish et al Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 and no less than 250mm across two-thirds of the moni- tored years. Agroecological zone 3 comprises 1,306,000 ha (7.1% of the country) with an annual rainfall of 250 to 350mm and no less than 250mm over half of the mon- itored years (FAO, 2003). These agroecological zones are key factors affecting the spread of the WRFT, which is key information when it comes to the planning for sub- sequent studies on their propagation and preservation. It is worth noting that this region is currently exposed to climatic changes, especially drought, based on the amount of seasonal rain mentioned in the description of this region. To identify the location of WRFT exposed to deterioration after the conflict, the researchers con- ducted focus group discussions with community rep- resentatives in each subdistrict to explain the aim of the study, its methods and objectives (one in each of 11 subdistricts under study during the period from 25 September 2021 to 25 October 2021). These represen- tatives nominated 50 key informant candidates, such as agricultural engineers, senior farmers and agricul- tural researchers, which had considerable knowledge of the agriculture sector in their region and were targeted for data collection via interviews and a multiple-choice questionnaire (Supplemental data). The questionnaire was designed to gather local knowledge on the location, usage, reasons for decline and appropriate conservation strategies for WRFT. Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 in NW Syria during data collection, 38 of the targeted informants elected to participate via online interviews, while the remaining 12 agreed to in-person interviews. It’s worth mentioning that the quality of online interviews was the same as in- person data collection. Data collection started on 25 September 2021 and was completed by 25 October 2021. The data collected from the questionnaires were transferred to MS Excel (Microsoft Office 2020) prior to analysis. Data cleaning was undertaken to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the dataset. This involved identifying and rectifying any inconsistencies, outliers or missing values that could potentially skew the results. Variability and dispersion within the dataset were calculated with Excel formulas, including but not limited to measures such as standard deviation, to extract valuable insights. Seed collection and storage The main criterion to decide whether the collected seeds were WRFT or not, was their natural spread sites. More specifically, the collected WRFT were collected from wild and forest locations. For species with similar phenotypes and for which phenotype is not sufficiently reliable to distinguish between genotypes, for example, Ficus carica, Olea europaea and Vitis vinifera, the seeds were collected from wild mountainous sites far away from agricultural areas, and according to the interviewees and field team observations. The collected WRFT existed in these wild sites for a long time, and their morphological growth differs from the cultivated species and landraces of the same species (especially the shape of leaves, fruits and trees). WRFT fully ripe fruits were collected during the harvesting season and the fruit flesh (pulp) was removed. The extracted seeds were then spread out on paper sheets and dried in the open air for 30 days, with the seeds flipped daily to make sure they were completely dry. Then they were disinfected using thiram fungicide, placed in a paper bag labelled with the species name, location, date and storage data, and stored in airtight plastic barrels with dry silica gel for future studies associated with the propagation and establishment of local WRFT in situ conservation sites and ex situ collections. This conservation method was selected due to the ongoing war in Syria, where electricity is not available for preserving seeds under refrigerated conditions, based on the recommendation of the Millennium Seed Bank staff provided to the research staff through their visit to the Millennium Seed Bank in July 2019 as an alternative method for seed conservation. Moreover, Ashok et al (2017) showed that this method of conservation could help to conserve seeds for several years as recommended by Yoshinaga (2010). For each of the collected accessions, 100 seeds were weighed for each genotype, and the value was multiplied by 10 and expressed as g/1,000 seeds; average values per species, with standard deviation, were calculated. Results Focus group discussions conducted with community representatives and experts in the agricultural sector in the targeted subdistricts showed that several WRFT locations had been subject to neglect after the Syrian crisis and had experienced significant deterioration (Figure 1). Data from the 50 interviews showed that WRFT were found in the following four types of locations within the study area: forests, verges along agricultural roads, rocky and neglected parts of farms, and working farms. The percentage of responses among the 50 participants for the distribution of WRFT in study locations is illustrated in Figure 2. The interviews revealed that the following ten WRFT species are experiencing erosion: Prunus mahaleb, Prunus orientalis, Vitis vinifera, Rhus coriaria, Olea europaea, Crataegus azarolus, Ficus carica, Pistacia atlantica, Prunus spinosa, and Pyrus syriaca. A range of reasons was reported for WRFT deterio- ration (Figure 3). The primary causes were overgraz- ing, frequent droughts and climate change. The predom- inant conflict-related factors reported were neglect by local authorities, lack of awareness of the importance and value of WRFT and deforestation resulting from the collection of wood for fuel and conversion to arable lands. Several respondents mentioned the lack of inter- est by the younger generation in making use of local wild fruit landraces, overuse (massive unmanaged fruit gath- ering), desertification and expansion of building into for- Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Threats to fruit tree wild relatives in Syria 71 Figure 1. Study area for identification of wild relatives of fruit trees (WRFT) exposed to deterioration. Source: Humanitarian Data Exchange Figure 2. Proportion of respondents reporting types of locations in which wild relatives of fruit trees (WRFT) are found. est locations as contributing factors. Floods were not considered a threat by any of the respondents. Based on the assessment result with the interviewees, the reasons for erosions of WRFT are equal within all areas of the study. With respect to the impact of the ongoing conflict in NW Syria on WRFT, all participants stated that the Syrian armed conflict had intensified the deterioration due to the lack of government control leading to overgrazing and excessive cutting of trees in these locations. When questioned about conservation actions that were considered to be the most important for the protection of WRFT against the current deterioration, participants responses showed the following answers: 36% suggested exchanging seeds of WRFT with other farmers, 26% supported the establishment of local collections for multiplication of these species, 22% considered public awareness campaigns and 14% favoured seed collection and conservation of these species in local genebanks. Only 2% considered awareness campaigns to be the most important action for the protection and preservation of these species. Regarding the availability of seeds or cuttings of the WRFT species, 56% of the participants stated that seeds or cuttings of these species were not available, whereas 44% stated that they have access to seeds and cuttings. This response suggests that some WRFT are currently at high risk of decline and may even suffer extinction over time. Collection of WRFT genotypes The results of the interviews and questionnaire allowed the identification of locations where WRFT had been exposed to deterioration and needed conservation. Based on available resources, the researchers collected mature seeds of each WRFT species from these locations as a first research and conservation step. For each of the priority WRFT species identified, five genotypes were collected from areas facing particularly severe deterioration There were slight variations in seed 72 Aldarvish et al Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Figure 3. Reasons given, and percentage of respondents reporting, for deterioration of wild relatives of fruit trees (WRFT). From top to bottom – C: Overgrazing; B: Frequent droughts and climatic changes; K: Consequences of Syrian crisis (lack of law enforcement); I: Lack of knowledge about the importance and value of these species; G: Deforestation, including collection of wood for fuel; H: Neglecting by local authorities; J: Interest of the younger generation for local wild fruit landraces is very low; F: Overuse (massive unmanaged gathering); A: Spread of cultivation to new areas and need to grow economic crops; E: Desertification and expanding of buildings towards forest locations and arable lands; D: Floods. weight among the genotypes within species, and the species averages are given in Table 1. As seed weight can influence the speed and percentage of germination and can be particularly important in challenging environments (Upadhaya et al, 2007), and since maternal effects should be accounted for in any subsequent comparative testing of plants derived from the collection, seed weights for each genotype were taken. The primary purpose of presenting the weight of seeds was to know the standard deviation for the seed weight within different genotypes collected from the same species. This can be investigated in future studies (genetic fingerprinting for these genotypes) to distinguish between phenotype and genotype within the same species and to identify if these variations in seed weight result from environmental factors or are related to genetic features Discussion Future food security for humankind is likely to rely heavily on the sustainable availability of a wide range of plant genetic resources for food, agriculture and nutrition, amongst other needs. WRFT are highly valued genetic resources for food production and to support the livelihoods of rural populations, especially in low- income countries. WRFT in Syria are threatened by extinction due to conflict, which has led to increased direct pressure on the tree populations themselves, and to an absence of research authorities working in the field Table 1. Average seed weights (g/1,000 seeds) for each wild relative of fruit trees (WRFT) species collected. WRFT Species Average seed weight (g/1,000 seed) Standard deviation Ficus carica 14.82 0.38 Olea europaea 720.00 144.05 Prunus spinosa 309.00 20.74 Vitis vinifera 100.00 7.91 Prunus orientalis 506.00 20.74 Pistacia atlantica 141.00 20.43 Rhus coriaria 92.00 9.08 Prunus mahaleb 180.00 16.96 Crataegus azarolus 400.00 15.81 Pyrus syriaca 165.20 2.83 of conservation and propagation of genetic resources. Consequently, there is a high risk that this vital resource may be lost to future research, and its fruits to future generations. Our results parallel those of previous studies, which have identified that plant genetic resources in Syria are particularly exposed to deterioration arising from the ongoing conflict (Gaafar, 2021; AlDarvish et al, 2022). However, similar threats to wild plant genetic diversity have also been reported worldwide (Iriondo et al, 2012; Castañeda-Álvarez et al, 2016; Paudel et al, 2016). Prior to this study, the most recent available information on the current status of WRFT dates from 11 Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Threats to fruit tree wild relatives in Syria 73 years ago (FAO, 1996) before the start of the conflict. At that time in the study area, the key locations for WRFT were rich in wild genotypes because they were protected by government authorities such as the Ministry of Agriculture and the Directorates of Environmental Protection. As reported by our interviewees, the absence of state protection has resulted in increased deterioration of WRFT populations in these locations, as exploitation such as grazing or cutting of fuelwood for heating is now uncontrolled (Gaafar, 2021). This neglect and lack of protection for WRFT by state institutions has and continues to exacerbate ongoing pressure from climate change and is resulting in severe genetic erosion of these species. As government bodies have not been present in the study area for over a decade, the condition of WRFT has continued to deteriorate, as reported by Valderrabano et al (2018). Moreover, all interviewees stated that the weakness of current state institutions, which demonstrate little interest in wild fruit trees, has led to increased genetic erosion and deterioration of these genotypes in NW Syria. WRFT are highly valued for use directly as food resources and as commodities that contribute to livelihoods, especially in rural populations in low- income countries. They are also an essential source of genetic diversity for breeding new, higher-yielding, climate change-tolerant varieties. Despite their high value for food and agriculture (Maxted and Kell, 2009; Musayev and Huseynova, 2016; Symphorien et al, 2016; Ercişli and Sagbas, 2017; Vincent et al, 2019; Zhebentyayeva et al, 2019; Engels and Thormann, 2020; Uğur and Gündeşli, 2020), WRFT have been almost entirely neglected in both ex situ and in situ conservation programmes. As they are likely to be locally adapted and genetically distinctive, WRFT can provide vital novel variation for domesticated fruit species to help meet the challenge of increasingly stressful environments and climatic changes. For example, they have been used by plant breeders to develop more efficient nutrient uptake and utilization, and to integrate genes for adaptation to stressful environments such as water stress, salinity and high temperatures (Ayenan et al, 2019; Mishra et al, 2022). As for WRFT, Spiegel-Roy (1986) stated that wild relatives of fruit trees are one of the essential resources for fruit tree breeding, especially for disease tolerance, rootstocks and genetic engineering. To secure the future of these vital resources, conservation protection efforts are urgently needed for the degraded areas they occupy. The priority species we have identified need to be included in plantation programmes to secure the genetic diversity that will be needed for the improvement of commercially cultivated crops. Countries of the Near East and the Mediterranean basin have perhaps the longest tradition in fruit cultivation for historical, environmental and evolutionary reasons (Barone and Caruso, 1998; Wolf et al, 2000; Khoury et al, 2017; Migicovsky and Myles, 2017; Bissessur et al, 2019). This study represents the first s tep i n highlighting the extremely threatened status of these genotypes. Our initiative to obtain accurately mapped locations for these genetic resources can underpin future research efforts towards ex situ and in situ conservation programmes. Furthermore, the seed we have collected will form the start of a local genebank collection for future studies of genetic variation and propagation, which can help to ensure resilient and sustainable agricultural development for future generations in Syria and worldwide. Acknowledgments This research was supported by Cara (the Council for At-Risk Academics), United Kingdom. The Syrian research team wishes to extend their thanks to Joan Cottrell and StephenCavers for their valuable assistance in developing the manuscript. Supplemental Data Interview questionnaire Author contributions Munzer Aldarvish coordinated the research and con- tributed to the research design and manuscript; Anas Al Kaddour, Akram Bourgol, and Yasser Ramazan con- tributed to the research design and manuscript and undertook the data analyses, Yousef Hallak contributed to the research design and carried out the field data col- lection; Stephen Caversand Joan Cottrellprovided aca- demic guidance and support throughout the research process and contributed to the manuscript. Conflict of interest statement The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, and there is no financial i nterest t o r eport. W e c ertify t hat the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication. References AlDarvish, M., AlKaddour, A., Bourgol, A., Alramadan, Y., Hallak, Y., Kell, S., and S (2022). Survey and conservation of crop landraces in northwest Syria. Genetic Resources 3(5), 51–58. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.46265/genresj.USTS1801 Ashok, Shakuntal, N. M., and Gowda, B. (2017). Ultra- dry seed storage: A novel technology for enhancing seed longevity. Int J Chem Stud 5(5), 1851– 1857. url: https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/ 2017/vol5issue5/PartY/5-5-49-270.pdf. Ayenan, M. A. T., Danquah, A., Hanson, P., Ampomah- Dwamena, C., Sodedji, F. A. K., Asante, I. K., and Danquah, E. Y. (2019). Accelerating Breeding for Heat Tolerance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): An https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.USTS1801 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.USTS1801 https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2017/vol5issue5/PartY/5-5-49-270.pdf https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2017/vol5issue5/PartY/5-5-49-270.pdf https://www.genresj.org/index.php/grj/article/view/genresj.ETES2274/suppdata113 https://www.genresj.org/index.php/grj/article/view/genresj.ETES2274/suppdata113 74 Aldarvish et al Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Integrated Approach. Agronomy 9(11), 720–720. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110720 Barone, E. and Caruso, T. (1998). The Mediter- ranean agrobiodiversity wealth: an overview of minor fruit tree species. Report of the IPGRI Con- ference 9-11 February 1998 – ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria . url: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search. do?recordID=QJ2002000084. Bissessur, P., Baider, C., Boodia, N., Badaloo, M. G. H., Bégué, J. A., Jhumka, Z., Meunier, A., Mungroo, Y., Gopal, V., Kell, S. P., Magos, Brehm, J., Thormann, I., and Jaufeerally-Fakim, Y. (2019). Crop wild relative diversity and conservation planning in two isolated oceanic islands of a biodiversity hotspot (Mauritius and Rodrigues). (2019) Plant Genetic Resources; 1- 11. Plant Genetic Resources 2019(2), 174–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000576 Castañeda-Álvarez, N. P., Khoury, C. K., Achicanoy, H. A., Bernau, V., Dempewolf, H., Eastwood, R. J., Guarino, L., Harker, R. H., Jarvis, A., Maxted, N., Müller, J. V., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Sosa, C. C., Struik, P. S., Vincent, H., and Toll, J. (2016). Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Nat. Plants 2, 16022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.22 Dempewolf, H., Eastwood, R. J., Guarino, L., Khoury, C. K., Müller, J. V., and Toll, J. (2013). Adapting agriculture to climate change: a global initiative to collect, conserve, and use crop wild relatives. Agroecol. Sust. Food 38, 369–377. doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/21683565.2013.870629 Engels, J. M. M. and Thormann, I. (2020). Main Challenges and Actions Needed to Improve Conser- vation and Sustainable Use of Our Crop Wild Rela- tives. Plants 9(8), 968. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants9080968 Ercişli, S., Güleryüz, M., Orhan, E., Ertürk, Y. and Karlı- dağ, H. (2009). The Use of Wild Edible Fruits in Sus- tainable Fruit Production in Turkey. In 1st Interna- tional Symposium on Sustainable Development. Ercişli, S. and Sagbas, H. I. (2017). Wild Edible Fruits: A Rich Source of Biodiversity. ANADOLU, J. of AARI 27(2), 116–122. url: https://arastirma.tarimorman. gov.tr/etae/Belgeler/AnadoluDergisi/2017/2/15\ %20mak\%20116-122.pdf. Eyzaguirre, P., Padulosi, S., and Hodgkin, T. (1998). IPGRI’s strategy for neglected and underutilized species and the human dimension of agrobiodiversity. In Padulosi, S., Priority Setting for underutilized and neglected plant species of the Mediterranean region. Report of the IPGRI Conference, 9-11 February 1998, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 1-20. FAO (1996). Syria: Country Report to the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources. International Tech- nical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17-23 June 1996. url: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/ documents/PGR/SoW1/east/SYRIANAR.PDF. FAO (2003). Agro-ecological zones and farming systems. In Fertilizer Use by Crop in the Syrian Arab Republic, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. FAO (2015). National Strategy for Conservation and Management of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Lebanon 2015–2035 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Ministry of Agriculture). url: https://faolex.fao.org/ docs/pdf/leb169447.pdf. FAO, IFAD and WFP (2015). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress (Rome: FAO). url: https://www.fao.org/documents/ card/en/c/c2cda20d-ebeb-4467-8a94-038087fe0f6e. Gaafar, R. (2021). The Environmental Impact of Syria’s Conflict: A Preliminary Survey of Issues. url: https://ceobs.org/ari-the-environmental-impact- of-syrias-conflict-a-preliminary-survey-of-issues/. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., and Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1185383 Iriondo, J. M., Maxted, N., Kell, S., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Lara-Romero, C., Labokas, J., and Brehm, J. M. (2012). Quality standards for genetic reserve conservation of crop wild relatives. In Agrobiodiversity conservation: securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces, ed. Maxted, N., Dulloo, M. E., Ford- Lloyd, B. V., Frese, L., Iriondo, J., and de Carvalho, M. A. P. (CABI), 72-77. Khoury, C. K., Greene, S. L., Williams, S. L., Karen, A., Sosa, C. C., and Richards, C. (2017). Conservation priorities for tree crop wild relatives in the United States. In Proceedings of Workshop on Gene Conservation of Tree Species-Banking on the Future. Maxted, N. and Kell, S. (2009). Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs (Rome: Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO). url: https://www.fao.org/3/i1500e/i1500e18a.pdf. McCouch, S., Baute, G. J., Bradeen, J., Bramel, P., Bretting, P. K., Buckler, E., Burke, J. M., Charest, D., Cloutier, S., Cole, G., Dempewolf, H., Dingkuhn, M., Feuillet, C., Gepts, P., Grattapaglia, D., Guarino, L., Jackson, S., Knapp, S., Langridge, P., Lawton-Rauh, A., Lijua, Q., Lusty, C., Michael, T., Myles, S., Naito, K., Nelson, R. L., Pontarollo, R., Richards, C. M., Rieseberg, L., Ross-Ibarra, J., Rounsley, S., Hamilton, R. S., Schurr, U., Stein, N., Tomooka, N., Van Der Knaap, E., Van Tassel, D. D., Toll, V., Valls, J., Varshney, J., Ward, R. K., Waugh, J., Wenzl, R., Zamir, P., and D (2013). Feeding the future. Nature 499, 23–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/499023a https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110720 https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=QJ2002000084 https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=QJ2002000084 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000576 https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.22 https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.870629 https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.870629 https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9080968 https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9080968 https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/etae/Belgeler/AnadoluDergisi/2017/2/15\%20mak\%20116-122.pdf https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/etae/Belgeler/AnadoluDergisi/2017/2/15\%20mak\%20116-122.pdf https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/etae/Belgeler/AnadoluDergisi/2017/2/15\%20mak\%20116-122.pdf https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/PGR/SoW1/east/SYRIANAR.PDF https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/PGR/SoW1/east/SYRIANAR.PDF https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/leb169447.pdf https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/leb169447.pdf https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/c2cda20d-ebeb-4467-8a94-038087fe0f6e https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/c2cda20d-ebeb-4467-8a94-038087fe0f6e https://ceobs.org/ari-the-environmental-impact-of-syrias-conflict-a-preliminary-survey-of-issues/ https://ceobs.org/ari-the-environmental-impact-of-syrias-conflict-a-preliminary-survey-of-issues/ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383 https://www.fao.org/3/i1500e/i1500e18a.pdf https://doi.org/10.1038/499023a Genetic Resources (2023), 4 (7), 68–75 Threats to fruit tree wild relatives in Syria 75 Migicovsky, Z. and Myles, S. (2017). Exploiting Wild Relatives for Genomics-assisted Breeding of Perennial Crops. Front. Plant Sci 8, 460–460. doi: https://doi. org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0046 Mishra, S., Chowrasia, S., and Mondal, T. K. (2022). Dhani (Oryza coarctata): A Wild Relative of Rice is a Potential Source of Coastal Salinity Tolerance Genes Suitable for Rice Breeding. In Transforming Coastal Zone for Sustainable Food and Income Security, ed. Lama, T., Burman, D., Mandal, U. K., Sarangi, S. K., and and, H. S., (Cham: Springer). MSEA (2009). The fourth national report on biodiversity in the Syrian Arab Republic. url: https://www.cbd.int/ doc/world/sy/sy-nr-04-en.pdf. Musayev, M. and Huseynova, T. (2016). Collection, study and use of crop wild relatives of fruit plants in Azerbaijan. International Journal of Minor Fruits, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 2(2). url: https://www. ijmfmap.in/pdf vol2 2/vol 2 2 2.pdf. Otieno, E. (2017). Wild edible indigenous fruit tree species in East Africa’s drylands: A coping mechanism for vulnerable farmers and pastoralists against drought and hunger. MITI Magazine (35). url: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/345804108 Wild edible indigenous fruit tree species in East Africa’ s drylands A coping mechanism for vulnerable farmers nd pastoralists against drought and hunger. Paudel, M. N., Joshi, B. K., and Ghimire, K. H. (2016). Management Status of Agricultural Plant Genetic Resources in Nepal. Agronomy Journal of Nepal 4, 75– 91. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/ajn.v4i0.15517 Pilling, D., Bélanger, J., Diulgheroff, S., Koskela, J., Leroy, G., Mair, G., and Hoffmann, I. (2020). Global status of genetic resources for food and agriculture: challenges and research needs: Global status of genetic resources for food and agriculture. Genetic Resources 1(1), 4–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.46265/ genresj.2020.1.4-16 Spiegel-Roy, P. (1986). Domestication of Fruit Trees. Developments in Agricultural and Managed Forest Ecology 16, 201–211. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ abs/pii/B9780444427038500178. Symphorien, A., Assogbadjo, E. A., Chadare, F. J., Achille, E., Idohou, R., Salako, K. V., Agoyi, E. E., and Kakäı, R. L. (2016). Ecological diversity and conservation of wild edible fruit trees species in the Lama Forest Reserve in Benin. Bois et Forets des Tropiques 329(3), 53–65. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 19182/bft2016.329.a31312 UN DESA (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241, (New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). url: https://population.un.org/ wpp/publications/files/key findings wpp 2015.pdf. Upadhaya, K., Pandey, H. N., and Pynsakhiat, L. (2007). The Effect of Seed Mass on Germination, Seedling Survival and Growth in Prunus jenkinsii Hook.f. & Thoms. Turkish Journal of Botany 31(1). url: https: //journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/vol31/iss1/4. Uğur, R. and Gündeşli, M. A. (2020). Investigation of propagation with hardwood cutting in different Prunus species. Int J Agric For Life Sci 4(2), 189–189. url: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/ article- file/1246751. Valderrabano, M., Gil, T., Heywood, V., and Montmollin, B. D. (2018). Conserving Wild Plants in the South and East Mediterranean Region (IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature). doi: https://doi. org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.21.en Vincent, H., Amri, A., Castaneda-Alvarez, N. P., Dem- pewolf, H., Dulloo, E., Guarino, L., Hole, D., Mba, C., Toledo, A., and Maxted, N. (2019). Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation. Commun Biol 2(136). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0372-z Weibull, J. and Phillips, J. (2020). Swedish Crop Wild Relatives: towards a national strategy for in situ conservation of CWR. Genetic Resources 1(1), 17–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.17-24 Wolf, H., Arenhövel, W., Behm, A., Franke, A., Kleinschmit, J., Rogge, M., Schneck, D., Schneck, V., Schulzke, R., and Tabel, U. (2000). Conservation and breeding of wild fruit tree species in forestry. Acta Hortic 538, 57–62. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.17660/ ActaHortic.2000.538.4 Yoshinaga, A. (2010). Guidelines For Success- ful Seed Storage. Revised April 2010 (Center for Conservation Research and Training), 1-9. url: https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/ougc/downloads/ Guidelines for Storage.pdf. Zhebentyayeva, T., Shankar, V., Scorza, R., Callahan, A., Ravelonandro, M., Castro, S., Dejong, T., Saski, C. A., and Dardick, C. (2019). Genetic characterization of worldwide Prunus domestica (plum) germplasm using sequence-based genotyping. Horticulture Research 6, 12–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018- 0090-6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0046 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0046 https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/sy/sy-nr-04-en.pdf https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/sy/sy-nr-04-en.pdf https://www.ijmfmap.in/pdf_vol2_2/vol_2_2_2.pdf https://www.ijmfmap.in/pdf_vol2_2/vol_2_2_2.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345804108_Wild_edible_indigenous_fruit_tree_species_in_East_Africa's_drylands_A_coping_mechanism_for_vulnerable_farmers_nd_pastoralists_against_drought_and_hunger https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345804108_Wild_edible_indigenous_fruit_tree_species_in_East_Africa's_drylands_A_coping_mechanism_for_vulnerable_farmers_nd_pastoralists_against_drought_and_hunger https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345804108_Wild_edible_indigenous_fruit_tree_species_in_East_Africa's_drylands_A_coping_mechanism_for_vulnerable_farmers_nd_pastoralists_against_drought_and_hunger https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345804108_Wild_edible_indigenous_fruit_tree_species_in_East_Africa's_drylands_A_coping_mechanism_for_vulnerable_farmers_nd_pastoralists_against_drought_and_hunger https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345804108_Wild_edible_indigenous_fruit_tree_species_in_East_Africa's_drylands_A_coping_mechanism_for_vulnerable_farmers_nd_pastoralists_against_drought_and_hunger https://doi.org/10.3126/ajn.v4i0.15517 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.4-16 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.4-16 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780444427038500178 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780444427038500178 http://dx.doi.org/10.19182/bft2016.329.a31312 http://dx.doi.org/10.19182/bft2016.329.a31312 https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/vol31/iss1/4 https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/vol31/iss1/4 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1246751 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1246751 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.21.en https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.21.en https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0372-z https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.17-24 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.2020.1.17-24 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.538.4 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.538.4 https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/ougc/downloads/Guidelines_for_Storage.pdf https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/ougc/downloads/Guidelines_for_Storage.pdf https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0090-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0090-6 Introduction Materials and methods Data collection and analysis Seed collection and storage Results Collection of WRFT genotypes Discussion Acknowledgments Supplemental Data Author contributions Conflict of interest statement