ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 DOI: 10.46265/genresj.LYOQ7265 https://www.genresj.org ISSN: 2708-3764 Genetic improvement of indigenous cattle breeds in Ethiopia: A systematic review of the Fogera cattle open nucleus breeding scheme Assemu Tesfa *,a,b, Kefyalew Alemayehu a,c, Mengistie Taye a,d and Demelash Kassahun b a College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia b Andassa Livestock Research Center, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia c Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Institution (ATI), Amhara Agricultural Transformation Center (AATC), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia d Institute of Biotechnology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Abstract: Fogera cattle are one of the valuable indigenous milk-type local breeds of Ethiopia, widely adapted to the area around Lake Tana in the Amhara region. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the performance of the Fogera cattle breed under an open nucleus breeding scheme. The review was done systematically by collecting published and unpublished data sources on the breed. The overall milk yield of the nucleus Fogera cattle herd was 2.26±0.794L/day. From the total herd, the top 10% and 25% of them produced daily milk yields of 3.31 and 2.87L, respectively, and some elite cows gave an average of 5.45±0.73L/day with a maximum yield of 8L/day. The predicted 305-day milk yield for the top 10% and 25% of the total herd was 883.64 and 772.83L, respectively. The average lactation milk yield and lactation length were reported to be 489±184L and 243±72.79 days, respectively. The respective heritability estimates for the aforementioned traits were 0.20±0.23 and 0.27±0.001. The birth and weaning weights (at 8 months of age) of village Fogera cattle born from community-based breeding programmes (CBBP) were 23.77±.21 and 85.89±1.07kg, respectively. The average weaning age for the CBBP herds was reduced to 8 months. The overall calf mortality in the nucleus herd was 3%. The CBBP demonstrated that it could act as a significant entry point for ensuring the conservation and restocking efforts of this breed as a country asset. Keywords: Community-based breeding programme, Ethiopia, Growth traits, Milk yield, ONBS, Reproductive traits Citation: Tesfa, A., Alemayehu, K., Taye, M., Kassahun, D. (2024). Genetic improvement of indigenous cattle breeds in Ethiopia: A systematic review of the Fogera cattle open nucleus breeding scheme. Genetic Resources 5 (10), 94–106. doi: 10.46265/genresj.LYOQ7265. © Copyright 2024 the Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Indigenous animal genetic resources are believed to pre- serve much of the current global genetic diversity, with millions of people directly depending on them (FAO, 2023). Indigenous cattle breeds constitute an impor- tant reservoir of genetic material, for which develop- ing nations have failed to provide adequate recognition through their sustainable use and conservation, which ∗Corresponding author: Assemu Tesfa (assemu546@gmail.com) puts them at risk of extinction. For example, Sheko cat- tle in Ethiopia are highly threatened because of cross- breeding with other local cattle, and others like Fogera, Begayit, Ogaden and Borena cattle breeds in Ethiopia are also facing various degrees of threat that challenge their existence as a breed (IBC, 2004). These breeds are decreasing and deteriorating in terms of both population size and genetic diversity due to paradigm shifts in the existing farming system and production system and farm size dynamics of the native habitat, leading to a subse- quent genetic dilution (Kebede et al, 2013; Tesfa et al, 2017; Adisu et al, 2021). Received: 18.10.2023 Accepted: 23.09.2024 Published online: 05.11.2024 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.LYOQ7265 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.LYOQ7265 mailto:assemu546@gmail.com Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 95 The increasing demand for dairy products because of high population growth, urbanization and improved standards of living is pushing Ethiopia’s livestock keep- ers to increase the productivity of their animals (Shapiro et al, 2015). Shapiro et al (2017) indicated that, to real- ize genetic improvement programmes in Ethiopia, the best contributors are a range of agro-climates and pro- duction systems, feed and water availability, and small to large-scale farms. Since the 1960s, selective breed- ing and crossbreeding have been implemented for the genetic improvement of Ethiopian cattle (Chebo and Alemayehu, 2012). However, the anticipated improve- ment in milk production and productivity has not yet been achieved, even with crossbreeding. The reasons for this, as indicated by Shapiro et al (2015), include separate implementation interests between research and development officials, the absence of a clear and imple- mentable strategy that targets the improvement scenario of indigenous breeds, and the absence of sustained sup- port from different stakeholders. Fogera cattle are one of the promising breeds of Ethiopia that are widely adapted to the plain of Lake Tana in the Amhara region. The Fogera cattle breed is known for its relatively higher milk yield, larger body frame and traction power, better resistance to internal parasite infestation, and sound adaptability to waterlogged Fogera plains, which is attributed to its long legs (Tesfa, 2015). The milk production potential and draught power of the breed are farmers’ preferred traits (Zewdu, 2004; Bitew et al, 2007). In its production environment, the breed is used as a dam line for milk yield improvement (with Holstein Frisian semen) while the bulls are used in crossbreeding with local highland zebu cattle, which perform poorly under smallholder production system, to improve milk yield, growth rate and draught power (Tesfa et al, 2017, 2022). The population size of Fogera cattle is declining at an alarming rate, therefore urgently requiring conservation efforts for future potential use of the breed. The Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC) has been implementing selective breeding and conservation efforts both on station and on farm to safeguard the Fogera breed from extinction and increase its productivity. The center was established in 1964 as the Imperial Fogera Cattle Conservation Centre, with 57 Fogera cows and three bulls purchased from the local area. It was then re-organized as a farm in 1980-1981 and started its operation with the main objective of conserving Fogera cattle and producing F1 Holstein × Fogera crossbreds for distribution to farmers to increase milk production. It was upgraded into a livestock research centre in 2000 (ALRC, 2017). However, in its 40-year journey, it did not provide any visible, significant and sustainable positive change to farmers’ lives. Among the reasons is the inability to design and formulate an effective breeding programme. This is a key problem not only for ALRC case but also for all farms, ranches and multiplication centres found in the country. In 2007, an open nucleus breeding scheme linking the ALRC nucleus and the village herds was designed for Fogera cattle improvement, and the programme was also used as a model for other breeds under different research centres, farms and multiplication centres. The ultimate objective of the breeding scheme was to restock the declining village Fogera cattle populations and improve the livelihood of the farmers. This manuscript summarizes the productive performances, past achieve- ments, shortcomings and lessons learned under the open nucleus breeding scheme and community-based breed programme (CBBP) and indicates gaps and future direc- tions for the sustainability of breeding initiatives. Material and methods Data sources Various researchers, professionals and students (PhD and MSc) involved in the Fogera cattle breeding programme published articles, proceedings and case studies at the level of the two nucleus herds (ALRC and CCBIR) as well as on the community herds. From the summary, above 10 MScs, 2 PhD dissertations, 42 published journal articles and above eigh national, regional, and societal proceedings had information regarding Fogera cattle production and productivity. Besides, more than ten articles have used the genetic potential of Fogera cattle in comparison with other national and internationally recognized breeds for genetic diversity, selection signatures and molecular conservation studies. For this case study, data from more than 17 papers and thesis works with full information on the breed done under the open nucleus breeding scheme were analyzed and compared, while research articles with little information on the Fogera cattle were used to discuss and supplement the main findings. The collected data were analyzed by SAS (2002) and MS Excel was used to develop graphs and trend lines. Besides, articles published online on different Ethiopian breeds were used to discuss the main findings of the case study (Table 1). Data analysis Daily milk yield (L), lactation milk yield (L), birth weight (kg) and weaning weight (kg) performance were the dependent variables, while breeding period (year), sex, season and district were used as independent variables for the analysis of quantitative traits. The fixed factors were analyzed by the GLM procedure of SAS (2002) software. Genetic parameter estimation for pre-weaning growth performance and milk-related traits was done by the statistical procedure of Wombat software (Meyer, 2007) in the case of Kassahun et al (2020) and ASReml (Gilmour et al, 2015) in the case of Tesfa (2015). Heritability, repeatability, and genetic and phenotypic correlations were estimated. Survival of calves at the nucleus herd was done with the Cox proportional hazards model (Cox, 1972) of Stata software (SE 14) (1996–2021) in the case of Gessesse 96 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Table 1. Data sources used for the systematic review. ALRC, Andassa Livestock Research Center; CCBIR, Chagni Cattle Breeding and Improvement Ranch. Publication types Publication/ releasing years Articles’ focus Working sites Study topics No. of publications MSc thesis 1992 to 2019 Fogera cattle breed ALRC, CCBIR and on farm Growth, milk, reproduction, survival 6 Scientific articles 2005 to 2023 Fogera cattle breed ALRC, CCBIR and on farm Growth, milk, reproduction, survival, population number 15 1982 to 2023 Ethiopian indigenous cattle breeds Different sites in Ethiopia Production system, growth, milk, reproduction 10 Proceedings 2007 to 2019 Fogera cattle breed ALRC, CCBIR and on farm Production system, growth, milk, reproduction, survival 5 Reports and working documents 2004 to 2023 Fogera and other Ethiopian indigenous cattle breeds Different sites in Ethiopia Production system, breeding design, strategic plan 8 et al (2021a), and the chi-square test of SPSS (version 22) was used in the case of Mola et al (2019). Results Description, distribution and adaptive potential of Fogera cattle The Fogera breed is characterized and well known by its pied coat of black-and-white or black-and-grey; short, stumpy, pointed horns; hump ranging from thoracic to cervico-thoracic; folded dewlap, of moderate to large size; docile temperament; and is used for draught, milk and meat (Rege and Tawah, 1999; DAGRIS, 2007). It is highly tolerant or resistant to heat stress and solar radiation, which could be due to its dominantly white coat colour with short hair. Additionally, the breed is known for its adaptation to high altitudes, tolerance to parasite and disease infestation, fly burden, wet soils or swampy areas, low-quality feed and other unfavourable environmental conditions (Alberro and Haile-Mariam, 1982). Farmers keeping Fogera cattle reported the breed is known for its drought tolerance, better milk yield and growth rate (Tesfa et al, 2022), and its environmental adaptation and meat production potential (Kassahun, 2019). The breed is reared in districts surrounding Lake Tana and is one of the most populous and productive breeds in the Amhara region (Tesfa, 2015) and the country (IBC, 2004). Additionally, the breed is found and conserved at ALRC, Chagni Cattle Breeding and Improvement Ranch (CCBIR), and their surrounding kebeles (a small administrative unit in Ethiopia). Figure 1 shows the Fogera cattle distribution districts and working sites. Description of the breeding strategy The open nucleus breeding scheme (Figure 2) was the strategy employed since 2007 to conserve, improve and restock the declining population of Fogera cattle. The nucleus was established in early 1964 by the Emperor’s regime (ALRC, 2017). The scheme was implemented in selected districts where the pure line breed was intended to be produced, namely Wagetera kebele of Fogera District and Metrha Abawarka kebele of Gondar Zuria District. However, due to high levels of admixture observed in the village herd, the breeding scheme has been closed since 2015. This has prevented the introduction of heifers from the village herd to the nucleus herd to safeguard the latter from genetic dilution (Figure 3; Tesfa et al (2017)). The districts involved in the open nucleus breeding scheme study were selected through the participation of researchers and experts, with criteria such as the presence of true-to-type Fogera cattle (50%), accessibility and presence of knowledgeable farmers (25%), and others like the willingness of farmers, availability of communal grazing land, and enough land for feed development (25%). After the selection, a discussion was done with the community on points like the importance and productivity of the breed, its value for them, and the need for conservation and improvement strategies. After a consensus was built with the community, farmers were selected to hold the breeding bulls and serve the community. Those farmers were selected based on wealth status, cattle management practices and the presence of a better educational background for record keeping. The bulls were provided under a written contractual agreement for four years of service to avoid inbreeding, after which the bulls became the property of the recipients. The participating farmers were then arranged as a community-based breeding programme, having their own committee to manage and decide on the activity with the researchers leading the programme (Tesfa et al, 2019). The meta-analysis was done for production traits like daily milk yield, lactation milk yield, lactation length; Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 97 Figure 1. a) Distribution of Fogera cattle in the Amhara region, and Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC) and Chagni Cattle Breeding and Improvement Ranch (CCBIR) nucleus sites (Tesfa et al, 2022); b) Districts suitable for the production of Fogera cattle breed and community-based breeding programmes (CBBP) working sites (Tesfa et al, 2017) growth-related traits for birth weight and weaning weight; reproductive performance traits for age at first calving, calving interval, and days open; and calf survival in Fogera cattle kept under an open nucleus breeding scheme. Productive and reproductive performances Milk yield performance of Fogera cattle According to the report of Tesfa et al (2019), the milk yield of Fogera cattle at ALRC showed an increasing trend from 2002 to 2017, with a lower yield between 2005 and 2007. The inbreeding rate during this time, according to the author, contributed to this outcome. Removing the inbred individuals increased the output from 1.92 to 2.43L per day. From the total herd, the top 10% and 25% had an average milk yield of 3.31L and 2.87L per day, respectively. At ALRC, there were four groups of pure nucleus herds with an average of 45 cows and one mating bull. These were selected and grouped based on their estimated breeding value (EBV) for milk yield and family relationships to minimize inbreeding; the top 45 individuals with higher EBV were grouped as group I, and next 45 individuals with group II and the like for group III and IV (Table 2). 98 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Figure 2. Open nucleus breeding scheme (ONBS) (Tesfa et al, 2019) As indicated in Table 2, the daily milk yield per cow had a big variation from 0.4 to 7.2L per day, which still allows for improvement within breed selection. The predicted 305-day milk yield also indicated a big variation among breeds and ranged from 274 to 1,194L of milk with an overall average of 578.26L. The top 10% and 25% of the total herd had a 305-day milk yield of 883.64 and 772.83L, respectively (Tesfa et al, 2019). According to the experiment by Bitew et al (2021) on the potential exploitation of the breed for milk yield, cows were divided into two groups: group one received concentrate feed adjusted based on their daily milk yield in addition to grazing, while group two relied on grazing alone (control). The cows in group one gave 4.69L of milk per day compared to 2.21L in the control group. This indicated that the breed’s genetic potential may have been masked by poor environmental conditions, which need to be improved through delivering additional feeds and husbandry practices. According to Kassahun et al (2020), the average daily milk yield (DMY) and lactation length (LL) of the breed were 1.98±0.60L and 243±72.79 days, respectively, and the lactation milk yield (LMY), which is calculated by multiplying DMY by LL, was 489±184L. As shown in the trend (Figure 4), the results for these parameters exhibited significant variability and inconsistency over the reported years, which was due to the lower selection intensity and number of animals considered in the selection procedure (Kassahun et al, 2020). According to the genetic parameters estimate, heritability for DMY, LL and LMY was 0.33±0.27, 0.20±0.23, and 0.27±0.001, respectively. Besides, the repeatability of the respective traits of interest was 0.33, 0.48, and 0.55 (Kassahun et al, 2020). Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 99 Figure 3. Closed breeding scheme (Tesfa et al, 2017) Table 2. Milk yield performance of the four pure nucleus herds at the Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC). Source: Tesfa et al (2019) Herd type Milk yield (L/day) Mean SD Minimum Maximum Overall 2.26 0.794 0.4 7.2 Fogera Group I 2.24 0.731 0.7 5.5 Fogera Group II 2.52 0.863 0.6 6.1 Fogera Group III 2.05 0.814 0.4 7.2 Fogera Group IV 2.18 0.707 0.6 4.5 100 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Figure 4. Lactation length (LL), lactation milk yield (LMY) and daily milk yield (DMY) of Fogera cattle across selection years (Kassahun et al, 2020) Growth performances Performance under Nucleus herd. The birth and weaning weight of Fogera calves in the two nucleus herd populations is presented in Figure 5. According to the trend across selection years, both weaning and birth weight showed variability in both sites. The main rea- sons for this inconsistency were variations in the man- agement of pregnant cows and calves, climate variabil- ity exerting an effect on feed availability, poor record- ing systems, and differences among individual ani- mals included in the selection process during different years (Bekele, 2012; Tesfa et al, 2016; Kassahun et al, 2022). Besides, the observed inbreeding in the nucleus herd during 2006-07 (Mekuriaw and Bitew, 2006) and varying management aspects (Kassahun et al, 2022) at ALRC contributed to the declining trend of birth and weaning weight of Fogera calves. The heritability estimate for the pre-weaning growth rate of Fogera cattle at the two nucleus herds is summarized in Table 3. It was observed that the heritability for birth weight had declined with the advancement of years at ALRC. Differences across years might be due to management differences that influence the environmental part of the estimated genetic parameter, the number of data points, and differences in methods of estimation among the authors. The heritability estimate at CCBIR was lower compared to ALRC; even the estimate for the F1 crossbreed between the Fogera and Holstein Friesian was lower for birth weight and pre-weaning average daily gain (PWADG) and comparable for weaning weight (Table 3). The lower estimate at CCBIR for pre-weaning growth parameters was attributed to the presence of management variations, poor nutritional status of the animals, high environmental stress and data record quality (Bekele, 2012; Zeleke, 2014). Performances under community-based breeding pro- gramme (CBBP) . As an open nucleus breeding scheme, ALRC distributed about 17 pure improved Fogera bulls selected based on their estimated breeding value and physical soundness in two kebeles to conduct a community-based breeding programme since 2012. Trained enumerators collected data for 8 conscutive years on birth and weaning weight from 2,180 calves born by distributed improved bulls and village local bulls for performance comparison. The birth and wean- ing weights (at 8 months of age) of the village herds born from improved bulls were 23.77±0.21 and 85.89±1.07kg, respectively (Tesfa et al, 2019). The aver- age weaning age was lowered from one year to 8 months. Based on the monitoring data at CBBP villages, the average birth and weaning weight of calves born from village local bulls were 20.21 and 85.14kg (at 1 year of age), respectively. This indicated that attempts made through the open nucleus breeding programme, beyond the conservation and restocking efforts, can achieve the genetic improvement of the indigenous Fogera cattle breed (Tesfa et al, 2019). Strategic deworming of internal parasites and sched- uled vaccination against known diseases (anthrax, lumpy skin disease, foot and mouth disease and bovine pasteurellosis) were implemented as part of the flock health monitoring. Additionally, grazing land manage- ment, the introduction of waterlogged tolerant grass varieties and fattening technology for castrated vil- lage local bulls were introduced to CBBP villages to improve the production environment and create an income source for producers. According to (Tesfa et al, 2019), under the CBBP, the age at first calving (AFC) was reported to be 36 months, and compared with the Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 101 Figure 5. Birth weight and weaning weight at the two nucleus herds. ALRC BWt, birth weight at the Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC); CCBIR BWt, birth weight at the Chagni Cattle Breeding and Improvement Ranch (CCBIR); ALRC WWt, weaning weight at ALRC; CCBIR WWt, adjusted weaning weight at CCBIR (Bekele, 2012; Tesfa et al, 2016; Kassahun et al, 2022). Table 3. Direct heritability estimate for pre-weaning growth traits at the two nucleus herds. BWt, birth weight; WWt, weaning weight; PWAGD, pre-weaning average daily gain; *, estimates were done for Fogera × Holstein Friesian (F1). Parameters BWt WWt PWADG References ALRC 0.38±0.32 0.22±0.25 Sewalem (1992) 0.24±0.09 0.18±0.05 Tesfa et al (2019) 0.21±0.07 0.26±0.01 0.55±0.19 Kassahun et al (2022) CCBIR 0.03±0.02 0.06±0.03 0.05±0.03 Bekele (2012) 0.13±0.04 0.24±0.08 0.16±0.07 Zeleke (2014)* actual results before the programme, there was a one- year shortening of AFC. This shows how pure Fogera bulls contributed to upgrading the genetic makeup of the village herds. As traction power is a selective trait of the farmers, calves born through the breeding programme started ploughing at 31 months of age, while the farm- ers’ local bulls did the same work at 41 months Tesfa et al (2019). The positive contribution of the open nucleus breeding programme at the on-farm level to the improvement of the genetics and environment was appreciated by participant farmers (Kassahun, 2019). Reproductive performances of nucleus herd The average reproductive performance of Fogera cattle at ALRC and CCBIR is presented in Figure 6. The overall average age at first calving (AFC) of 52.00±3.27 months and 52.17±3.17 months; calving interval (CI) of 19.86±2.15 months and 18.65±1.12 months; and days open (DO) of 341.62±90.89 and 280.27±53.86 days were reported at ALRC and CCBIR nucleus herds, respectively. The AFC (month) and DO (day) were lower at ALRC nucleus herds compared with CCBIR’s while CI (month) was shorter in the CCBIR nucleus herd compared with the ALRC’s (Figure 6). Variations between these two nucleus breeding herds might be attributed to the presence of agroecological differences among the sites. Due to the objectives of the breeding scheme, the improvement in reproductive performance was attained through indirect selection with daily and lactation milk yield. A comparable result for DO (9.5 months), higher CI (19.56 months), and lower AFC (50.8 months) was reported for the nucleus herd at CCBIR (Melaku et al, 2011) and a slightly lowered DO (10.17 months) (Gebeyehu et al, 2005), AFC (51.76 months), and CI (19.53 months) was reported for nucleus herd at ALRC (Tesfa et al, 2016). As reported by Sendeku et al (2016), the AFC and CI for on-farm Fogera cattle was 51.4±0.05 and 21.18±0.70 months, respectively. Calf mortality rate The overall calf mortality at ALRC and CCBIR was 3% (Gessesse et al, 2021b), which is comparable with the minimum standard (3–5%) set for the calf mortality rate (Heinrichs and Radostits, 2001). Gessesse et al (2021a) reported that season, breed and birth weight had a significant (P < 0.05) association with the incidence of calf mortality in both Fogera cattle nucleus herds, with a respective hazard ratio (HR) of 102 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Figure 6. Reproductive performance of Fogera cattle at the two nucleus herds. ALRC AFC, age at first calving at the Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC); CCBIR AFC, age at first calving at the Chagni Cattle Breeding and Improvement Ranch (CCBIR); ALRC CI, calving interval at ALRC; CCBIR CI, calving interval at CCBIR; ALRC DO, days open at ALRC; CCBIR DO, days open at CCBIR (Bekele, 2012; Tesfa, 2015; Kassahun, 2019) 1.6, 0.55, and 0.88. Conversely, other potential risk factors such as calf sex, dam parity, year of birth and location did not show a significant effect on calf mortality rates at an early age of the calves at both ALRC and CCBIR (Gessesse et al, 2021b). The author indicated that among the significant risk factors, birth weight (HR = 0.88, P = 0.000) was found to be a very important determinant of calf mortality. Based on the health monitoring data, the overall morbidity and mortality rate reported for Fogera calves at ALRC were 12.96% and 7.5%, respectively (Figure 7) (Mola et al, 2019), and the diseases contributing to calf mortality were diarrhea, systemic infection, coccidiosis, and gastrointestinal parasites, in order of importance. On the other hand, the work done at ALRC (Kassahun et al, 2023) indicated that the pre-weaning mortality rate of male calves (21.3%) was higher than that of female calves (13.4%). Based on the factors considered, the dry season and lightweight calves contributed more to calf mortality than the wet season and heavyweight calves, respectively. The main reasons for the contribution of these factors were the variability of feedstuffs across seasons and the ability to resist the new environment with a heavier weight at birth, respectively. The heritability estimates done for calf survival at 1, 4 and 8 months of age were 0.26, 0.22 and 0.38, respectively (Kassahun et al, 2023), which is categorized as a medium level of heritability. Population status of Fogera cattle The estimated population size of the Fogera cattle breed is declining progressively from about 800,000 in the 1980s (Alberro and Haile-Mariam, 1982) to 55,646 heads in 2017 (Tesfa et al, 2022), even though Girma et al (2016) argued for the presence of satisfactory genetic diversity in Fogera cattle. According to the breed keepers, the population of the Fogera cattle has decreased (40%), increased (13%), is stable (6%) or is not known (41%) (Tesfa et al, 2022), while respondents who replied to Kassahun (2019) indicated the population had increased (51.81%), decreased (31.81%), is constant (4.54%) or is not known (11.84%). The difference between the population trends of the two studies is that the respondents to Kassahun (2019) were participants in the open nucleus breeding scheme done by ALRC. Tesfa et al (2022) indicated the households in the production track of the breed had kept relatively pure Fogera (41%), Fogera-zebu mix (35%), and highland zebu (24%). The Fogera breed appeared to be threatened due to changes in the agricultural production system in the area and genetic dilution by interbreeding with other adjacent indigenous cattle breeds and by indiscriminate crossbreeding with exotic dairy cattle breeds. Population viability analysis indicated that the pure Fogera cattle are not viable, and population growth is decreasing due to feed shortages, interbreeding with other indigenous breeds, disease and parasites (Alemayehu et al, 2015). Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 103 Figure 7. Morbidity and mortality percentage of Fogera cattle at the Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC) (adapted from Mola et al., 2019) Discussion The daily milk yield of the Fogera cattle at the on- station level indicated a wider variation across selection years, ranging from 0.4 to 7.2L per day, with an average of 2.26L. The reported average daily milk yield (DMY) and lactation milk yield (LMY) were higher than the 1.65±0.03L and 475.85L, respectively, reported for Horro cattle at on-farm conditions (Mekonnen et al, 2012) and LMY (425.34±24.06L) at Bako agricultural research centre, Ethiopia (Dabi, 2020). Relatively lower respective values of DMY, LMY and lactation length (LL) of 1.5±0.01L, 419.8±4.45L, and 284.1±0.15 days were reported for Horro cattle at the on-fam level (Mekonnen et al, 2021). Similarly, Mekonnen et al (2021) reported that the top 10% and 25% of the Horro cattle population produced 2.01 and 1.86L of milk/head/day, respectively, which is lower than that reported for Fogera cattle (Tesfa et al., 2019). Lower average DMY (1.7L) and higher LMY (507L) were also reported for Boran cattle (Haile et al, 2011). Mezgebe et al (2018) reported a higher average DMY (4.04kg) and average LMY (936kg) for Begait cattle in northern Ethiopia. The reproductive performance of Fogera cattle observed under both open nucleus and community- based approaches at village herds was comparable with those of other Ethiopian indigenous cattle (Mohammed, 2020; Adisu et al, 2021). According to Tenagne et al (2023), the performance for calving interval (CI) and age at first calving (AFC) for indigenous cattle in northwest Ethiopia was 20.4±6.1 and 52.5±6.8 months, respectively. A slightly lower result for AFC and CI for Ethiopian Boran cattle at on-station set-up was 48.39±1.41 and 17.91±1.01 months, respectively (Hordofa and Melua, 2021), while a higher value for AFC and CI for the same breed at on-farm level was 53.0 and 18.0 months, respectively (Wario et al, 2016). Lower results for AFC (41.2±0.28 months), CI (13.9±0.3 months), and days open (100.5±4.5 days) were reported for Horro cattle in on-station conditions (Jalata et al, 2023). The observed variations in the reproductive performance traits between the Ethiopian indigenous cattle breeds might be due to differences in the adaptation of the various local breeds that make them useful for husbandry in different areas and their genetic diversity should therefore be conserved through appropriate programmes. Conclusion and ways forward This systematic review summarizes the efforts towards genetic improvement and conservation of Fogera cattle under the open nucleus breeding scheme at ALRC and CCBIR as a nucleus herd and at the on-farm level under CBBP. The results indicate that there was an improvement in milk and growth-related traits, although the trend was slow and decreasing. The presence of variation among individuals in traits of interest suggested there is room for improvement of the breed through selection. One can also assume that the breeding programme was successful, but there are still different problems masking the genetic potential, such as feed availability, management system of dams, data recording, and transfer of data from one researcher to the other. The closed breeding scheme, which the centre currently follows, has been strengthened with the full involvement of farmers, other stakeholders, researchers and experts at different levels. On top of this, the community-based breed productivity improvement programme acts as a big entry point to assure the conservation and restocking efforts of the breed as a country asset, and the programme is better supported with forage, health and extension works to assure sustainability. With these conclusions, the following recommendations are 104 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 suggested for sustainable breeding programmes in the future: • Consistent data records are important for an accurate estimation of genetic and non-genetic parameters for better selection. Thus, a standard record-keeping practice should be adopted. • The researchers working on the community-based breeding programme should estimate the breeding values of distributed bulls from the nucleus and their daughters for milk and growth-related traits in order to ensure the contribution of a real genetic gain from the distributed bulls. • The breeding objective developed for milk-related traits should be revised to incorporate the potential of the breed for meat-related traits. • As heritability for calf survival has been catego- rized as medium, it is advisable to include it in the selection index under the breeding programme. • It is recommended to develop a reproductive biotechnology unit to speed up the genetic gain and multiply elite high-yielding animals, which should be established at one of the nucleus sites. Author contributions Assemu Tesfa and Kefyalew Alemayehu contributed to the study’s conception and design. Data collection and meta-anlysis were done by Assemu Tesfa, Mengistie Taye and Demelash Kassahun. Data analysis and writing of the first manuscript draft were performed by Assemu Tesfa. All authors commented on the various versions of the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript. Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. References Adisu, A., Zewdu, W., and Moreda, T. (2021). Cause for the Occurrence of Freemartin and its Influ- ence on Livestock Reproductive Performance: A review. J Anim Health Behav Sci 5(2). url: https: //www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/cause-for- the-occurrence-of-freemartin-and-its-influence-on- livestock-reproductive-performance-a-review.pdf. Alberro, M. and Haile-Mariam, S. (1982). The indigenous cattle of Ethiopia. Part II. World Animal Review 42, 27–34. url: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/ 66766. Alemayehu, K., Kebede, D., and Girma, E. (2015). Survival and population viability of Fogera cattle (Bos indicus, zenga type) in north West Amhara, Ethiopia. Global J. Anim. Breed. Genet 3(6), 181–187. url: https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/ articles/survival-and-population-viability-of-fogera- cattle-bos-indicus-zenga-type-in-north-west-amhara- ethiopia.pdf. ALRC (2017). Research and Development Achievements Booklet Abstract: A half Century Effort to improve the livelihoods of small holder livestock producers, ed. Tesfa, A. and Alemayehu, M. (Andassa Livestock Research Center). Bekele, A. (2012). Genetic parameter estimation of growth and reproduction traits of Fogera cattle at Metekel Ranch, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. MSc thesis. Bahir Dar University college of Agriculture and Environmental science, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Bitew, A., Mekuriaw, G., and Mulugeta, T. (2007). On-farm evaluation of management practices and productivity of Fogera cattle in Northwest Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual regional conference on completed livestock research activities, Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. url: https://www.arari.gov.et/p roceedings.php. Bitew, A., Tilahun, M., Meseret, M., Mekuriaw, S., Tesfa, A., Lakew, E., Ferede, Y., and Haile, M. (2021). Milk yield and composition of Fogera cows fed with napier grass and concentrate feed at Andassa Livestock Research Center. Int J Agri Biosci 10(3), 158–163. url: http://www.ijagbio.com/pdf-files/volume-10-no- 3-2021/158-163.pdf. Chebo, C. and Alemayehu, K. (2012). Trends of cattle genetic improvement programs in Ethiopia: Challenges and opportunities. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24(7). url: https://www.lrrd.org/ lrrd24/7/cheb24109.htm. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life- tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34(2), 187–202. doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x Dabi, S. E. (2020). Milk Yield and Reproductive Performances of Dairy Cows at Bako Agricultural Research Center. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences 7(1). url: https://ijras.org/ administrator/components/com jresearch/files/ publications/IJRAS 826 FINAL.pdf. DAGRIS (2007). Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System (DAGRIS), ed. Kemp, S., Mamo, Y., Asrat, B., and Dessie, T. (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Livestock Research Institute). url: http: //dagris.ilri.cgiar.org. FAO (2023). Genomic characterization of animal genetic resources - Practical guide, ed. Ajmone-Marsan, P., Boettcher, P. J., Colli, L., Ginja, C., Kantanen, J., and Lenstra, J. A. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.4060/ cc3079en Gebeyehu, G., Asmare, A., and Asseged, B. (2005). Reproductive performances of Fogera cattle and their Friesian crosses in Andassa ranch, Northwest- ern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Devel- opment 17(12). url: https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd17/ 12/gosh17131.htm. Gessesse, T., Dagnew, Y., Abegaz, S., and Tesfa, A. (2021a). Growth Performance and Survival Rate of https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/cause-for-the-occurrence-of-freemartin-and-its-influence-on-livestock-reproductive-performance-a-review.pdf https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/cause-for-the-occurrence-of-freemartin-and-its-influence-on-livestock-reproductive-performance-a-review.pdf https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/cause-for-the-occurrence-of-freemartin-and-its-influence-on-livestock-reproductive-performance-a-review.pdf https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/cause-for-the-occurrence-of-freemartin-and-its-influence-on-livestock-reproductive-performance-a-review.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10568/66766 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/66766 https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/articles/survival-and-population-viability-of-fogera-cattle-bos-indicus-zenga-type-in-north-west-amhara-ethiopia.pdf https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/articles/survival-and-population-viability-of-fogera-cattle-bos-indicus-zenga-type-in-north-west-amhara-ethiopia.pdf https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/articles/survival-and-population-viability-of-fogera-cattle-bos-indicus-zenga-type-in-north-west-amhara-ethiopia.pdf https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/articles/survival-and-population-viability-of-fogera-cattle-bos-indicus-zenga-type-in-north-west-amhara-ethiopia.pdf http://www.ijagbio.com/pdf-files/volume-10-no-3-2021/158-163.pdf http://www.ijagbio.com/pdf-files/volume-10-no-3-2021/158-163.pdf https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/7/cheb24109.htm https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/7/cheb24109.htm https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x https://ijras.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJRAS_826_FINAL.pdf https://ijras.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJRAS_826_FINAL.pdf https://ijras.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJRAS_826_FINAL.pdf http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3079en https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3079en https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd17/12/gosh17131.htm https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd17/12/gosh17131.htm Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 Genetic improvement of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia 105 Fogera and Their Crossbred Calves at Government Ranches in Ethiopia. Front. Anim. Sci 2, 745682. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.745682 Gessesse, T., Misganaw, G., and Dagnew, Y. (2021b). Evaluation of survival rate of Fogera calves and their crossbred at Chagni Cattle Breed Improvement and Andasa Livestock Research Centres. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 45, 767–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/vet- 2011-60 Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J., and Thompson, R. (2015). ASReml User Guide Release 4.1 Functional Specification (Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK: VSN International Lim- ited). url: https://asreml.kb.vsni.co.uk/wp-content/ uploads/sites/3/2018/02/ASReml-4.1-Functional- Specification.pdf. Girma, E., Alemayehu, K., Abegaze, S., and Kebede, D. (2016). Phenotypic characterization, population structure, breeding management and recommended breeding strategy for fogera cattle (Bos indicus) in northwestern Amhara, Ethiopia. Anim. Genet. Resour 58, 13–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S2078633616000035 Haile, A., Ayalew, W., Kebede, N., Dessie, T., and Tegegne, A. (2011). Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 26 (Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI). url: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/ 132633748.pdf. Heinrichs, A. J. and Radostits, O. M. (2001). Health and production management of dairy calves and replace- ment Heifers. In Herd Health, Food Animal Production Medicine, ed. Radostits, O. M., (Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company), 333-395. Hordofa, B. B. and Melua, B. H. (2021). On Station Performance Evaluation of Borana Cattle under Rangeland Conditions of Borana Zone, South- ern Oromia, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. url: https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article- in-press-abstract/on station performance evaluation of borana cattle under rangeland conditions of borana zone southern oromia ethiopia. IBC (2004). The state of Ethiopia’s farm ani- mal genetic resources: country report, A Con- tribution to the First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources, IBC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. url: https://www.fao.org/3/a1250e/ annexes/CountryReports/Ethiopia.pdf. Jalata, B., Goshu, H. A., Mediksa, T., Bekele, D., and Aliye, M. (2023). Reproductive performance of Horro and Horro-crossbred dairy cows in Ethiopia’s subhumid tropical environments. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 323–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11250-023-03718-w Kassahun, D. (2019). Estimation of Genetic and Non- Genetic Parameters for Growth, Reproductive and Productive Performance Traits and Assessment of Farmers’ Perception on Fogera Cattle Breed in Community Based Breed Improvement Program. MSc. Thesis, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar Ethiopia. Kassahun, D., Kebede, D., Haile, A., Kebede, A., Tesfa, A., Tilahun, M., Bitew, A., Bimrow, T., Lakew, E., Meseret, M., Tesema, Z., and Taye, M. (2020). Phenotypic and genetic parameters of milk traits of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 32(3). url: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/ 3/mengi32044.html. Kassahun, D., Taye, M., Kebede, D., Tilahun, M., Tesfa, A., Bitew, A., Kebede, A., Meseret, M., Lakew, E., Bimrow, T., and Haile, A. (2022). Phenotypic and genetic parameter estimates for early growth, growth rate and growth efficiency-related traits of Fogera cattle in Ethiopia. Vet Med Sci 8, 387–397. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1002/vms3.628 Kassahun, D., Tesema, Z., Lakew, M., and Meseret, M. (2023). Risk factors and genetic parameter estimates for pre-weaning survival of Fogera calves. In Zeleke, G. and Lakew, M., Proceedings of the 15th Annual Regional Conference on Completed Livestock Research Activities May 5, 2023, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. url: https://w ww.arari.gov.et/proceedings.php. Kebede, A., Yiheyes, L., Eshete, T., and Zeleke, G. (2013). Production system shift and land frag- mentation on livestock production in Fogera district: with special emphasis to the indigenous Fogera cattle breed. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Farm Size Dynamics in East and Southern Africa. Mekonnen, A., Haile, A., Dessie, T., and Mekasha, Y. (2012). On farm characterization of Horro cattle breed production systems in western Oro- mia, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Devel- opment 24(6). url: https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/ meko24100.htm. Mekonnen, A., Haile, A., Dessie, T., Mekasha, Y., and Duguma, G. (2021). On Farm Evaluation of Milk Production and Composition Performance of Horro Cattle Breed in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J 10(3), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.20372/star.v10i3.01 Mekuriaw, G. and Bitew, A. (2006). Fogera cattle breeding line/pedigree at Andassa Livestock Research Center. Melaku, M., Zeleke, M., Getinet, M., and Mengistie, T. (2011). Reproductive Performances of Fogera Cattle at Metekel Cattle Breeding and Multiplication Ranch, North West Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res 1(3), 99–106. url: https://www.ojafr.ir/main/attachments/ article/68/OJAFR-A15.pdf. Meyer, K. (2007). WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007 Nov;8(11):815-21. J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. B 8(11), 815–821. doi: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus. 2007.B0815 Mezgebe, G., Gizaw, S., and Urge, M. (2018). Growth, reproductive, and productive performance of Begait https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.745682 https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2011-60 https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2011-60 https://asreml.kb.vsni.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/02/ASReml-4.1-Functional-Specification.pdf https://asreml.kb.vsni.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/02/ASReml-4.1-Functional-Specification.pdf https://asreml.kb.vsni.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/02/ASReml-4.1-Functional-Specification.pdf https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633616000035 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633616000035 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132633748.pdf https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132633748.pdf https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-in-press-abstract/on_station_performance_evaluation_of_borana_cattle_under_rangeland_conditions_of_borana_zone_southern_oromia_ethiopia https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-in-press-abstract/on_station_performance_evaluation_of_borana_cattle_under_rangeland_conditions_of_borana_zone_southern_oromia_ethiopia https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-in-press-abstract/on_station_performance_evaluation_of_borana_cattle_under_rangeland_conditions_of_borana_zone_southern_oromia_ethiopia https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-in-press-abstract/on_station_performance_evaluation_of_borana_cattle_under_rangeland_conditions_of_borana_zone_southern_oromia_ethiopia https://www.fao.org/3/a1250e/annexes/CountryReports/Ethiopia.pdf https://www.fao.org/3/a1250e/annexes/CountryReports/Ethiopia.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03718-w https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03718-w http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/3/mengi32044.html http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/3/mengi32044.html https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.628 https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.628 https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/meko24100.htm https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/meko24100.htm https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v10i3.01 https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v10i3.01 https://www.ojafr.ir/main/attachments/article/68/OJAFR-A15.pdf https://www.ojafr.ir/main/attachments/article/68/OJAFR-A15.pdf https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815 https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815 106 Tesfa et al Genetic Resources (2024), 5 (10), 94–106 cattle under different herd management systems in northern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod . doi: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1560-4 Mohammed, N. (2020). Meta Analysis of Repro- ductive Performance of Indigenous Cattle: In Case of Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 11(17). url: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index. php/JNSR/article/view/54106. Mola, L., Ferede, Y., Ayalew, M., and Asmare, Z. (2019). Magnitude and Causes of Cattle Morbidity and Mor- tality under On-Station Setup at Andassa Livestock Research. In Abegaz, S., Yeheyis, L., and Lakew, M., Proceedings of the 11th Annual Regional Conference on Completed Livestock Research Activities April 30 - May 5, 2018, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. url: https://www.arari.gov.et/pr oceedings.php. Rege, J. E. and Tawah, L. C. (1999). The state of African cattle genetic resources II. Geographical distribution, characteristics and uses of present- day breeds and strains. Animal Genetic Resources Information 26, 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1014233900001152 SAS (2002). SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 8 (Cary: SAS Institute), 6th edition, 112p. Sendeku, A. T., Kumar, D., Abegaz, S., and Mekuriaw, G. (2016). Evaluations of Reproductive Performances of Fogera Cattle Breed in Selected Districts of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Pharm. Med. Biol. Sci 5(1). url: https://www.ijpmbs.com/papers/9-A0223.pdf. Sewalem, A. (1992). Evaluation of the Reproductive and Pre-Weaning Growth Performance of Fogera Cattle and Their F1 Friesian Cross at Andassa Cattle Breeding Station, Ethiopia. Shapiro, B. I., Gebru, G., Desta, S., Negassa, A., Nigussie, K., Aboset, G., and Mechal, H. (2015). Ethiopia livestock master plan. Roadmaps for growth and transformation: A contribution to the Growth and Transformation Plan II (2015-2020). url: https:// faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eth191493.pdf. Shapiro, B. I., Gebru, G., Desta, S., Negassa, A., Nigussie, K., Aboset, G., and Mechale, H. (2017). Ethiopia livestock sector analysis. ILRI Project Report (Nairobi, Kenya: Interna- tional Livestock Research Institute). url: https: //cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ dabb7069-888d-4caa-900a-d37dca144fbc/content. Tenagne, A., Taye, M., Dessie, T., Muluneh, B., Kebede, D., and Tarekegn, G. M. (2023). Management practices, reproductive performances, and production constraints of indigenous cattle in north-western parts of Ethiopia. NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences 95(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 27685241.2023.2211533 Tesfa, A. (2015). Genetic parameter esti- mate for performance traits of Fogera cat- tle (LAP Lambert Academic Publishing). url: https://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Parameters- Estimate-Performance-Traits/dp/3659762474. Tesfa, A., Bimerew, T., Tilahun, M., Kassahun, D., Kebede, A., and Mengesha, W. (2022). Evaluation of the breeding practices and population trend of the Fogera cattle breed in Ethiopia. Front. Anim. Sci 3, 998628. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022. 998628 Tesfa, A., Kumar, D., Abegaz, S., and Mekuriaw, G. (2017). Conservation and Improvement Strategy for Fogera Cattle: A Lesson for Ethiopia Indigenous Cattle Breed Resource. Advances in Agriculture 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2149452 Tesfa, A., Kumar, D., Abegaz, S., Mekuriaw, G., Bimerew, T., Kebede, A., Bitew, A., Ferede, Y., Mazengia, H., and Tilahun, M. (2016). Growth and reproductive performance of Fogera cattle breed at Andassa Livestock Research Center. Livestock Research for Rural Development 28(1). url: https://www.lrrd.cipav.org. co/lrrd28/1/tesf28004.htm. Tesfa, A., Tilahun, M., Asmare, Z., Kassahun, D., Bimerew, T., Lakew, E., and Bitew, A. (2019). Open Nucleus Breeding Strategy for Fogera Cattle Breed in Ethiopia: Achievements and Future Directions. In Abegaz, S., Yeheyis, L., and Lakew, M., Proceedings of the 11th Annual Regional Conference on Completed Livestock Research Activities, April 30 - May 5, 2018, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Wario, H. T., Roba, H., Aufderheide, M., and Kaufmann, B. (2016). Reproductive performance and herd growth potentials of cattle in the Borana pastoral system, southern Ethiopia. Animal Production Science 57(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15215 Zeleke, B. (2014). Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Growth and Reproductive Traits of Fogera X Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cattle at Metekel Ranch, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. Zewdu, W. (2004). Indigenous cattle genetic resources, their husbandry practices and breeding objectives in North-western Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1560-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1560-4 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JNSR/article/view/54106 https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JNSR/article/view/54106 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001152 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001152 https://www.ijpmbs.com/papers/9-A0223.pdf https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eth191493.pdf https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eth191493.pdf https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/dabb7069-888d-4caa-900a-d37dca144fbc/content https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/dabb7069-888d-4caa-900a-d37dca144fbc/content https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/dabb7069-888d-4caa-900a-d37dca144fbc/content https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2023.2211533 https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2023.2211533 https://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Parameters-Estimate-Performance-Traits/dp/3659762474 https://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Parameters-Estimate-Performance-Traits/dp/3659762474 https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.998628 https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.998628 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2149452 https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd28/1/tesf28004.htm https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd28/1/tesf28004.htm https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15215 Introduction Material and methods Data sources Data analysis Results Description, distribution and adaptive potential of Fogera cattle Description of the breeding strategy Productive and reproductive performances Milk yield performance of Fogera cattle Growth performances Reproductive performances of nucleus herd Calf mortality rate Population status of Fogera cattle Discussion Conclusion and ways forward Author contributions Conflict of interest