GENEBANK REPORT Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 DOI: 1046265/genresj.FCUW9498 https://www.genresj.org ISSN: 2708-3764 History and current status of plant genetic resources conserved and maintained by the Hungarian central genebank Zoltán Áy *, Attila Simon, Adrienn Gyurkó, Evelin Fekete, Balázs Horváth and Borbála Baktay National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation, H-2766 Tápiószele, Külsőmező 15, Hungary Abstract: The predecessor of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) was established in Hungary in 1959. The 1950s were hectic times for Hungarian plant breeders, and many new genetic materials were registered in the National List of Varieties. In order to save obsolete genetic resources, in 1959 the government founded the Agrobotanical Institute at Tápiószele to prevent plant genetic erosion in the Pannonian region. The centre started its operation with 16,596 accessions. Their quantity continuously increased thanks to collecting missions and international connections. The NBGK collection is composed of cereals (37.3%), vegetables (18.7%), legumes (17.4%), industrial crops (5.29%), fruits and grapes (3.85%) and others. NBGK has operated under its current name since 2019 with the same mission as when it was first established. Today, it is the seventh largest genebank in Europe with 57,381 accessions of 1,745 plant species across 605 genera. Almost 95% of samples are maintained in the form of seeds in 15 cooled storage rooms (at temperatures of 5–8◦C or -18◦C), while the others are conserved in vitro, in the form of tubers or field c ollections. S haring g enetic m aterials has been a crucial part of the institute’s activities since the beginning. Between 2019 and 2023, a total of 92,100 samples were distributed to a variety of partners, mainly gardeners and farmers (83.85%) and NGOs (14.63%). Researchers, breeders and universities account for only 1.52% of seed requests, which is the opposite of what is observed in other genebanks. Keywords: plant genetic resources, gene conservation, ex situ, seed bank, Pannonian region Citation: Áy, Z., Simon, A., Gyurkó, A., Fekete, E., Horváth, B., Baktay, B. (2025). History and current status of plant genetic resources conserved and maintained by the Hungarian central genebank. Genetic Resources S2, 13–28. doi: 10.46265/genresj.FCUW9498. © Copyright 2025 the Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Foundation of the Hungarian genebank The history of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (Hungarian abbreviation NBGK) and its legal predecessor institutes started in the 1880s. Dr Lajos Szelényi, a Hungarian doctor born in Kismarton (today Eisenstadt, Austria), moved to Budapest after finishing his university studies in Vienna. Besides his healing activities, he was famous for his charity work. He donated large sums of money to Austrian and Hungarian medical and agricultural science. Dr Szelényi purchased 400 acres of land in Tápiószele, in the Central Hungarian Region, which he donated to the National Hungarian ∗Corresponding author: Zoltán Áy (*ay.zoltan@nbgk.hu) Economic Association in his 1885 will, specifying that the land was to be used by future generations for agricultural experiments and vocational education in agriculture. The work of the first few decades was destroyed several times by the World Wars, revolutions and political transformations. The 1950s were hectic times for Hungarian plant breeders, and many new genetic materials were registered in the National List of Varieties. In order to save the old and obsolete varieties, collection departments were established at the breeding institutions. The Agrobotanical Institute was established on the land in Tápiószele left by Dr Szelényi under the leadership of Dr Andor Jánossy (1908–1975) based on a government initiative in 1959, with the aim of integrating the genetic resource collections of the country and preventing genetic erosion (Jánossy, Received: 17.10.2024 Accepted: 28.11.2024 Published online: 08.01.2025 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.FCUW9498 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.FCUW9498 mailto:*ay.zoltan@nbgk.hu 14 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 1971). Despite several institutional reorganizations and changes of responsible organizations, the Hungarian genebank operated under its current name and form since 2019, and its function and scope of duties have changed little over the last 65 years. Currently, the NBGK operates as a central budgetary institution fulfilling public functions. It is maintained by the Hungarian Ministry of Agriculture, with 50% of its annual budget financed by the government and the other 50% covered through grants. The majority of these grants come from national sources, but some are financed by the European Union. Composition and expansion of the collection The institute started its operation with 16,596 acces- sions of 871 plant species. According to our database, the starting number of accessions included both Hun- garian and foreign materials. The number of accessions has continuously increased thanks to wide international scientific connections and collecting expeditions in Hun- gary and across the Carpathian Basin. Since its estab- lishment, the institute has exchanged genetic materi- als with around 400 other institutes, but development through collecting missions also has a long tradition in the genebank (Guerrant et al, 2014). Our founder and first director, Dr Andor Jánossy, recognized already at the beginning of the 1950s that landraces were going to disappear from public production due to the spread of large-scale industrialized agriculture. He was one of the first in the world to collect cereals, fodder crops, maize and vegetable landraces and local varieties in cooperation with his colleagues before they became lost from production, replaced by high-yielding, intensively farmed improved varieties. This activity has always been regarded as an important duty of the institute, and it is still carried out today, for example in the case of fig geno- types. In 2023, we collected 22 fig (Ficus carica L.) geno- types from the northern shore of Lake Balaton, one from Budapest and another one from West Hungary. Dur- ing the collecting trips, we measured and characterized fruits, leaves and branches. The collected twigs are prop- agated in our nursery. As part of the Pannon Seed Bank Project (a LIFE+ programme, LIFE08 NAT/H/000288), 2,064 accessions were collected between 2010 and 2014. These are vascular wild plants of the Pannonian biogeographical region and wild relatives of cultivated plant species (Hay and Probert, 2013; Walters et al, 2018). In the last 70 years, plant genetic resources have been collected from a total of 1,504 locations (Figure 1), adding 13,785 accessions of Hungarian origin to the collection of NBGK (Table 1). Today, collection work is also carried out abroad, thanks to collecting trips jointly organized with the genebanks of neighbouring countries (Slovakia and Romania). This has resulted in 2,477 lan- draces, local varieties, populations and ecotypes being collected from 340 locations. In addition, a further 237 accessions collected by foreign genebanks have been shipped to our institute through seed exchange. With regard to the amount of conserved genetic material, NBGK is the seventh largest genebank in Europe today, preserving 57,381 accessions of 1,745 species from 605 genera. Our oldest accessions date back to the early 1950s. Both the number of accessions and taxa was continuously increased until the 2010s, with a levelling off in the 2020s (Figure 2). Regarding the composition of the different plant groups (Table 2), our collection is dominated by cereals with 21,376 accessions, making up 37.3% of the collection. Besides the major spiked cereals like wheat (Triticum spp.) and barley (Hordeum spp.), maize (Zea spp.) and sorghum (Sorghum spp.), pseudocereals like amaranths (Amaranthus spp.), certain buckwheat species (Fagopyrum spp.), finger milet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) and teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) also belong to this group. Vegetables and grain legumes constitute 18.7% and 17.4% of the collection, respectively. The former group consists of the collections of tomato (Lycopersicon spp.), paprika (Capsicum spp.), Cucurbitaceae, onions (Allium spp.), root and leafy vegetables and other vegetables (e.g. Physalis spp.). Almost half of the grain legumes collection (4,322) is composed of Phaseolus species accessions originating from the American centre of origin and diversity, but pea (Pisum spp.), chickpea (Cicer spp.), lentil (Lens spp.) and soybean (Glycine spp.) accessions are also present. The three above-mentioned groups constitute 73.4% of the whole collection. The group of industrial crops containing 3,040 accessions includes genera such as sunflower (Helianthus spp.), flax (Linum spp.), poppy (Papaver spp.) and the neglected camelina (Camelina spp.) used for oil production. The group of forage legumes includes the accessions of 113 species from 20 genera, the most important of which are clovers (Trifolium spp.), alfalfas (Medicago spp.) and vetches (Vicia spp.) constituting 80.7% of this group. In terms of the number of taxa, Poaceae species are the second most diverse group (the first being herbs like medical plants from Lamiaceae and Asteraceae families) including 171 species of 51 genera. Almost half of the 2,298 accessions of grasses have been collected. Accessions of the Pannon Seed Bank are listed as a separate group. The accessions of the above-mentioned utilization groups are stored generatively as seeds in the genebank, equating to 94.44% of the collection. Besides this method, the institute has other ways of preserving plant genetic resources. Although such samples are only a small part of the collection, they are very valuable. In recent years, the ratio of collections preserved in the form of field collections has increased. Woody fruit crops, grapes and ornamentals are in this group, composing 3.85% of the collection. The collection of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and its wild relatives are preserved in vitro (Engelmann, 2011), constituting 1.24% of the genebank collections. From the group of tuber crops, Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) and onions Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 15 (Allium spp.) are preserved vegetatively, making up 0.47% of the collections. Multiplication and maintenance of genebank accessions Genotypes stored in the form of seeds, tubers, bulbs or in vitro are reproduced in the field if the minimal number of seeds required for genebank storage has to be reached, viability has declined, taxonomic analyses are necessary, the accession needs to be multiplied for distribution purposes, or experiments are required to be performed. Accessions conserved in the form of field collection are kept always outside in the fields. Three professional teams carry out the work related to such duties: the Department of Arable Crops, the Department of Horticultural Crops and the Department of Fruit Crops. The annual sowing plan is defined by the number of accessions requiring regeneration for the above-mentioned reasons and the number of spatially isolated field plots available for sowing. The number of accessions regenerated by growing new individuals in the field in the last 10 years is shown in Table 3. The number of accessions sown from the different plant groups fluctuates yearly. This is not only because the different collections contain a different number of accessions, but also due to the diversity of factors that need to be considered during multiplication. Between 2014 and 2023 plant groups with large collections – such as grain legumes, cereals, herbs and onions – dominated the multiplication process every year. Consequently, members of the Phaseolus, Triticum, Allium, Lycopersicon, Origanum and Capsicum genera reached the highest levels of multiplication in the last ten years. In this period, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were the most frequently multiplied species. The genebank established its fruit crop collection in 2013. Due to its continuous expansion, today it contains 1,212 accessions. Besides the members of the Maloideae subfamily (apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), pear (Pyrus communis L.), medlar (Mespilus germanica J.B. Phipps), quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.)), stone fruits (plum (Prunus domestica L.), sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.), cherry (Prunus avium L.), peach (Prunus persica L.), apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)) and other fruit species – such as Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) and service tree (Sorbus spp.) – are also found in the almost 9ha plantation. Furthermore, the collection is complemented by a 1ha walnut (Juglans regia L.) plantation and a 0.3ha grape (Vitis vinifera L.) plantation. Usually, three individual plants are conserved for each genotype. The first plants started to produce fruit in 2020. Our institute has conserved a vegetative collection of ornamental plant varieties (Iris, Hemerocallis, Hibiscus, Hosta spp.) of 976 accessions in the nurseries of the genebank since 2017. There is also a rare and old woody plant stand in the central site of the genebank, which functions as a locally protected arboretum. Some of the oak trees of the garden have been planted around the mansion (currently the main building) already in the time of Dr Lajos Szelényi. Unfortunately, the majority of the original English park died. The current garden was planted by the employees of the institute in the 1960s and 1970s. About 350 tree and bush species live here, including several rare ones like the Californian white oak (Quercus lobata Née), the Oregon cypress (Hesperocyparis bakeri Bartel), the Algerian fir (Abies numidica de Lannoy), the Trojan fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. equi-trojani Spach), the Cilician fir (Abies cilicica Carrière), the Spanish fir (Abies pinsapo Boiss.), the Turkish fir (Abies bornmuelleriana Coode & Cullen), the Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani subsp. libani A. Rich.) and the mountain pine (Pinus uncinata Turra). The agrobotanical analysis and the assessment of the morphological biodiversity of plants sown in the fields are carried out by taxonomists according to Hungarian and international guidelines (Table 4). The descriptors used for characterization are based on the descriptors lists of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV, 2005), the International Board of Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) (Thormann et al, 2018), the European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources (ECPGR) and in the case of grapes the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) (Hannin et al, 2006). For some plant species, we have refined or complemented the criteria system for agrobotanical analysis. For example, in the case of carrot, the UPOV guidelines have been integrated with the IBPGR descriptors and as a result, the following features are also recorded: colour of core, colour of cortex, root diameter of core relative to total diameter, and homogeneity of flesh colouring throughout root length. Today these characterization data are almost always confirmed by photos as well. Data are documented electronically and then assessed and stored in the database of the institute. The digitalization of the former paper-based agrobotanical analyses is a great challenge for us. Human resources, infrastructural developments The Hungarian genebank started its operation with 81 permanent workers in 1959. The number of employees exceeded 200 within ten years. Our first director, Dr Andor Jánossy, put great emphasis on scientific research, so he hired many researchers. Being a member of the genebank’s staff was prestigious in the 1970s. Political transformations that occurred in Hungary in 1990 led to the decline of the institute. Due to financial reasons, the number of employees was reduced to only 40 people within a few years, and the survival of the institute was at risk. Fortunately, since 2010 the Hungarian government has considered conservation of plant genetic diversity as an important issue once again, with a public function of strategic importance. Today the institute has 130 employees (Figure 3), six of which are scientists (dealing with research and development). More than 35% of workers have a university degree. 16 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Figure 1. Collection activity of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) in Hungary (1950–2023). Black, cultivated plants; red, wild plants (Pannon Seed Bank). End of data collection: 31 December 2023 (Google Maps). Table 1. Division of collected accessions by place of origin Places of collection NBGK Pannon Seed Bank Total Accessions Locations Accessions Locations Accessions Locations Hungary 11,802 1,322 1,983 416 13,785 1,504 Neighbouring country 2,396 319 81 21 2,477 340 Other country 237 166 0 0 237 166 Total 14,435 1,807 2,064 437 16,499 2,010 Figure 2. The increasing number of genera, species and accessions maintained by the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) from the date of its founding until now. End of data collection: 31 December 2023. Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 17 Table 2. Division of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) collection by utilization groups. *, roots and tubers, ornamentals and fruit crops. Method of conservation Plant utilization group Accessions Ratio of the whole collection (%) Generative (94.44%) Cereals 21,376 37.3% Vegetables 10,739 18.7% Grain legumes 10,002 17.4% Industrial crops 3,040 5.3% Fodder legumes 2,823 4.9% Grasses 2,298 4.0% Herbs 1,163 2.0% Others * 687 1.2% Wild species (Pannon Seed Bank) 2,064 3.6% Vegetative (0.47%) Tuber crops 63 0.1% Onions 209 0.4% In vitro (1.24%) Potato and its wild relatives 709 1.2% Plantation (3.85%) Woody fruit crops 1,051 1.8% Ornamentals 996 1.7% Grapes 161 0.3% Total 57,381 100,0% Table 3. Yearly number of accessions regenerated in the field between 2014 and 2023 divided by plant groups. DAC, Department of Arable Crops; DHC, Department of Horticultural Crops. Plant group 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 DAC Grain legumes 2,984 2,286 2,647 2,166 1,717 1,952 2,040 2,550 2,320 1,879 Cereals 1,657 1,071 1,712 1,445 2,542 2,163 2,049 2,089 2,725 2,582 Fodder legumes 720 566 484 382 646 583 491 360 367 330 Grasses 395 364 367 478 827 621 499 239 235 296 Industrial crops 296 207 214 231 314 384 418 274 229 289 Cucurbitaceae 370 155 218 126 120 261 238 140 98 130 Root and tuber crops 96 98 110 128 158 120 102 79 98 100 Pseudocereals 34 69 78 51 16 18 52 27 20 48 Total 6,552 4,816 5,830 5,007 6,340 6,102 5,889 5,758 6,092 5,654 DHC Onions 235 294 286 321 288 441 403 346 327 345 Tomato 67 56 82 51 49 102 138 70 50 71 Paprika 84 54 53 47 44 80 112 53 26 53 Other Solanaceae 66 26 56 7 11 17 30 4 8 6 Root vegetables 123 81 85 99 90 181 184 132 114 128 Leafy vegetables 161 100 51 60 61 160 160 98 87 124 Brassicaceae 50 27 56 45 29 52 67 30 41 30 Cucurbitaceae 149 42 19 5 14 51 47 72 39 39 Herbs 53 69 234 221 207 270 708 561 602 467 Ornamentals 33 12 23 25 43 65 52 192 140 151 Other vegetables 9 3 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Total 1,030 764 945 881 836 1,419 1,909 1,558 1,434 1,414 18 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Table 4. Descriptors for morphological diversity – an example using the agrobotanical description of a pear landrace according to the UPOV guidelines (2023). Name of variety ‘Hidegkúti nyári’ summer pear Shoot shape Straight, the internodes are long Shoot colour Brown-red on the sunny side with few lenticels Vegetative bud Rounded, markedly held out from shoot Bud support size Medium Average shoot length 62cm Average internode length/thickness 27.4mm/4.24mm Average leaf length/width 61.2mm/32.9mm Average petiole length/thickness 36mm/0.56mm Flower bud Short, mainly on spurs Petals Long, overlap, small in size, ovate in shape Position of stigma Mostly above the level of the anthers Time of maturity End of July – beginning of August Fruit size Short in height, small in diameter, the height-to-diameter ratio is approximately 1:1 Average fruit height/diameter 51.9mm/55mm Average fruit weight 68.1g Fruit shape The maximum diameter is in the centre of the fruit, the fruit is longitudinally symmetrical and the lateral shape is convex Fruit ground colour Yellow Fruit cover colour Absent Area of russet Small around the eye basin, none on the cheeks and around the stalk attachment Stalk shape Moderately long and thick, slightly curved, straight in relation to the axis of the fruit Average stalk length/thickness 28.5mm/9.5mm Average stalk cavity depth/width 1.1mm/12.8mm Average eye basin dept /width 3.2mm/16.4mm Flesh Soft, medium juicy, fine structure Sugar content 17.4Bx◦ Seed Elliptic Figure 3. Staff of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) in summer 2022. Photo by Gergely Gócsa, w ww.gocsafoto.hu Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 19 The infrastructure of the genebank – including the buildings and equipment – has continuously developed over time. During the first decade, seed conservation was carried out by storing the seeds in paper bags at room temperature. The first cold storage room – operating at 4◦C – was built in 1971. At the time, this was one of the first seed storage rooms of its kind in Europe. In order to make seed storage more effective, paper bags were replaced by aluminium bags and glass jars. As a result of large investment in recent years, one of our old buildings has been completely renovated (Figure 4). From 2024, all the cold storage rooms, seed drying rooms, and germination testing laboratory are located in the same place. Currently, 15 cold storage rooms are operating for direct seed conservation purposes. There are nine active storage rooms running at a temperature of 5–8◦C ensuring medium-term conservation, and we have six base storage rooms cooling seeds to -18◦C for long-term storage of genebank accessions of orthodox species (Dickie et al, 1990; Nagel and Börner, 2010). From the latter base storage rooms, three rooms have a special status: the National Base Storage Room, the Pannon Seed Bank and the Safety Duplicate Storage Room. The National Base Storage Room has been used since 1996, with the aim of maintaining safety duplicates from the collections of the other Hungarian gene conservation institutes at no cost. So far, 26 Hungarian gene conservation institutes have sent genetic materials totalling 16,966 accessions of 219 plant species from 124 genera. The Pannon Seed Bank project was a LIFE+ programme running between 2011 and 2015, aiming at the long-term conservation of native plant species of the Pannonian Biogeographical Region whose seeds can be stored with this technology. After a transition period, we rethought the project, and continued the monitoring and collection of wild plant species from the region in 2017. This cold storage room contains 2,064 accessions of 921 species from 430 genera today. In 2014 our genebank built the Safety Duplicate Storage Room with the support of the Hungarian Ministry of Agriculture and the Aggtelek National Park in the strictly guarded passage of a dripstone cave. The role of this storage room is to duplicate the seeds of the most important plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (25% of the whole collection), including landraces, local populations and ecotypes collected from the Carpathian Basin and also old varieties that have disappeared from public production. So far, 6,733 accessions of 289 species from 159 genera have been put in the Safety Duplicate Storage Room. Our equipment has been continuously modernized over the last 10 years, with the decreasing availability of physical labour force, driving us to purchase modern machines. Our former plot seeder and harvester have been replaced by new machinery in the last 1–2 years. For decades, we used Russian tractors and implements, but today we work with those produced in Western Europe and Hungary. Our germination testing laboratory has been upgraded by purchasing new incubators. The analytical, genetic and tissue culture laboratory has been equipped with state-of-the-art devices (Figure 5). In the future, we plan to renovate the greenhouses built in 1961 and also to obtain phenotyping systems. Breeding and maintenance of varieties Since its establishment, NBGK has regarded plant breeding as an important secondary activity. Our institute used to be one of the sites of the national variety testing network, where the performance testing of candidate varieties (plant materials under a 3- year registration process) took place. By applying the methods of positive individual selection and crossbreeding, the researchers of the genebank have developed 28 new varieties (Table 5). The qualifying certificates of our listed varieties are kept in our library (Figure 6). Many of them have been on the National List of Varieties for decades. The maintenance and propagule production of these varieties also take place in Tápiószele. Today, three Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) varieties (‘Tápiói korai’, ‘Tápiói sima’, ‘Tápiói piros’) and one sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) variety (‘Tápiói 96’) are included in this process. In 2023, our genebank applied for the registration of 17 candidate varieties on the National List of Varieties in the following categories: variety, landrace and variety developed for growing under particular conditions. Our candidate varieties are: one peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), two cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), one teff (Eragrostis tef), one coracan (Eleusine coracana). Our landrace candidates are: one sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), one sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.), one millet (Panicum miliaceum L.), two flax (Linum usitatissimum L.), one barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), one maize (Zea mays L.), one safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), one fodder watermelon (Cit- rullus amarus Schrad.), two tomato (Lycopersicon escu- lentum Mill.), one paprika (Capsicum annuum L.). Our candidate variety developed for growing under particular conditions is: one lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Our tomato and paprika landrace candidates were selected from genebank collections of 2,097 accessions and 3,615 accessions, respectively. We also perform preparatory and monitoring activities for variety devel- opment for other species, such as winter wheat, rye, common bean, kidney vetch (Anthyllis vulneraria L.), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.), timothy grass (Phleum pratense L.), smooth brome (Bro- mopsis inermis (Leyss.) Holub), poppy, onion, beet- root (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris), parsley (Pet- roselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss), carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus (Hoffm.) Arcang.), calendula (Calendula officinalis L.), summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.), dill (Anethum graveolens L.) and oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). In the case of these species, we currently do not have enough seeds for variety certifying analyses and for 20 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Figure 4. Ceremonial handover of the new genebank building of the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) on 10 July 2024. We plan to use this new building for at least 50 years for professional conservation of plant genetic resources in Hungary. Photo by Anikó Gál Soltész, NBGK Figure 5. (a) Oat (Avena sativa L.) accessions in the active storage room at a temperature of 5–8◦C in 2015; (b) Sowing of spiked cereals with a plot seeder in autumn 2019; (c) Measuring crude protein content in the biochemical laboratory in 2022; (d) DNA isolation from tetraploid wheat accessions in 2022. Photos by Attila Simon, Lajos Horváth and Dóra Bárdos. Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 21 Figure 6. Qualification certificate of the soybean variety called ‘Pannonia 10’ from 1967. The breeder was Viktor Ferenczi. Digitalized by NBGK Library. super-elite multiplication, and the different varieties still need to be fully described. We plan to apply for the reg- istration of these candidate varieties on the National List of Varieties within the next five years. The registration of landraces on the National List of Varieties is difficult in Hungary due to bureaucratic reasons, since these varieties cannot fulfil the criteria of uniformity during the DUS tests (Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability), or they often do not exceed the yield level of modern improved varieties used as control varieties during performance tests. Hungarian and international scientific and social relations The institute has always worked to meet international professional requirements (Cromarty et al, 1982; FAO, 2014). Director Dr Andor Jánossy organized the EUCARPIA congress in Budapest in 1974 (Jánossy and Lupton, 1974), during which the participants also visited the genebank in Tápiószele, which by that time already had an international reputation (Figure 7). In addition, our institute published the scientific journal Agrobotanika between 1959 and 1975, presenting the results of research colleagues and describing collecting trips. Hungary signed the Convention on Biological Diver- sity (CBD), ratified the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), and joined the quality assurance programme of A Euro- pean Genebank Integrated System (AEGIS). Our insti- tute is member of the Promoting a Plant Genetic Resources for Europe (PRO-GRACE) consortium, cre- ated within the Horizon Europe programme in 2023. We participate in ECPGR Working Group activities, and our collection is available in the ex situ database of the European Search Catalogue for Plant Genetic Resources (EURISCO). NBGK provides the presidency of the Hun- garian Plant Genebank Council, a consultative platform established in 2011. It works as an independent profes- sional advisory board besides the Minister of Agricul- ture. It is responsible for the professional representation of plant gene conservation, as well as related research and development issues in Hungary. Additionally, it pro- vides expert opinions on legislation, applications and national programmes related to plant gene conserva- tion, including to the Minister of Agriculture. We have contacts with several universities and around 30 uni- versity students spend their professional practices in the genebank every year, who may become future employ- ees of the institute. We participate in joint research and development projects together with universities and innovative enterprises from the commercial sector. We perform field experiments with drought-resistant alter- native species, edible grain legumes, fodder cereals, oil crops and Jerusalem artichoke, winter and spring lentil, chickpea and poppy. We study the chemical composi- tion of apple, pear, apricot, pumpkin, beetroot, cele- riac, carrot, tomato and herb accessions stored in the genebank by analytical methods (Table 6). In our genetic laboratory, we analyze tetraploid wheats (Röder et al, 1998) and the genetic relationship between in vitro con- served potatoes by using SSR (simple sequence repeats or microsatellite) markers. 22 Áy et al G enetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Table 5. Registered plant varieties in Hungary bred/maintained by the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) (1954–2024). Year, year of registration in Hungary. Denomination of species Scientific name Common name Hungarian name of variety Breeders Year Avena sativa L. Oat Tápláni csupasz Mr Miklós DEUTSCH, Mrs Zsuzsa WESEL 1973 Capsicum annuum L. Sweet pepper Kocsolai zöldhúsú NBGK 1970 Glycine max L. Soybean Pannonia 10 Mr Viktor FERENCZI 1967 Glycine max L. Soybean Tápláni takarmány Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Zsuzsanna KANYÓ 1968 Helianthus tuberosus L. Jerusalem artichoke Tápiói korai Mr Lajos HORVÁTH, Mrs Ágnes BÁRDY, Mr László HOLLY, Mr József BARTA 2003 Helianthus tuberosus L. Jerusalem artichoke Tápiói sima NBGK 2003 Helianthus tuberosus L. Jerusalem artichoke Tápiói piros NBGK 2022 Hordeum vulgare L. Spring barley Tápláni tavaszi Mr Miklós DEUTSCH, Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mrs Józsefné NÉMETH 1968 Ipomoea batatas L. Sweet potato Tápiói 96 NBGK 2003 Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Tomato Tápláni konzerv Mr János ÁVÁR, Mrs Jánosné ÁVÁR 1970 Medicago sativa L. Alfalfa Bánkúti Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Zoltán CSÁK, Mr Zoltán BÖJTÖS 1961 Medicago sativa L. Alfalfa Békésszentandrási Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Zoltán CSÁK, Mr Zoltán BÖJTÖS 1961 Medicago sativa L. Alfalfa Nagyszénási Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Zoltán CSÁK, Mr Zoltán BÖJTÖS 1961 Medicago sativa L. Alfalfa Szarvasi Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Zoltán CSÁK, Mr Zoltán BÖJTÖS 1961 Medicago sativa L. Alfalfa Tápiószelei 1 Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Árpád SZÜCS 1970 Melilotus albus Medik. Sweet clover Kecskeméti kétéves NBGK 1969 Oryza sativa L. Rice Nucleoryza Mr Zoltán SAJÓ, Mr József SIMON 1979 Panicum miliaceum L. Millet Topáz NBGK 1986 Phaseolus vulgaris L. Bean Nagykállói étkezési Mr Ambrus SZABÓ, Mrs Ambrusné SZABÓ 1979 Phaseolus vulgaris L. Bean Tápiói cirmos étkezési Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Árpádné SZÜCS, Mrs Józsefné NÉMETH 1980 Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. nanus Bean Tápiószelei barnabab Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Zsuzsanna KANYÓ 1967 Continued on next page G enetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 H ungarian genebank – H istory, status and outlook 23 Table 5 continued Denomination of species Scientific name Common name Hungarian name of variety Breeders Year Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. nanus Bean Tápiószelei fürjbab Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Zsuzsanna KANYÓ 1967 Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. nanus Bean Tápiói gyöngybab Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Zsuzsanna KANYÓ 1970 Trifolium incarnatum L. Crimson clover Kemenesaljai Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Miklós DEUTSCH 1968 Trifolium pratense L. Red clover Táplánszentkereszti diploid NBGK 1954 Trifolium pratense L. Red clover Táplánszentkereszti Mr Miklós DEUTSCH 1955 Trifolium pratense L. Red clover Hungaropoly tetraploid Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Miklós DEUTSCH, Mrs Lajosné HORVÁTH Dr, Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mr László BÁNYAI 1966 Trifolium pratense L. Red clover Tápiói tetraploid Mr Andor JÁNOSSY Dr, Mr Miklós DEUTSCH, Mr Árpád SZÜCS, Mrs Lajosné HORVÁTH Dr, Mr István SULYOK 1970 24 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Additionally, we coordinate our own on-farm net- work. Within a given landscape and agricultural district, plant populations adapted to local biotic and abiotic factors are often the most stable varieties (Holly et al, 2009). The on-farm programme was launched with four farmers in 2018. The network is expanding; in 2024, we are working with 20 farmers. Collecting seeds in their fields or gardens and recording information concerning the motivation of farmers in growing these varieties has contributed to our knowledge of agricultural biodiver- sity. Landraces of crops such as maize, vetches, cucur- bits, beans, paprika, rye (Secale cereale M. Bieb.) and some underutilized species (i.e. safflower) are used in on-farm conservation in various regions within Hungary. Farmers and gardeners taking part in the programme can try those landraces which had been collected from their area decades ago. Our partners worked with 430 landraces between 2018 and 2023. Since they report on their experience, the genebank gets useful first-hand information on the actual producibility and marketabil- ity of these plant genotypes. Our results are published in an open-access for- mat (Gyurkó et al, 2023; Kis et al, 2023). Besides inter- national scientific articles, our Hungarian popular publi- cations are also well-known among the local people. We also organize and take part in seed swaps run by NGOs in different parts of the country. Our institute is open for groups of visitors by prior arrangement. Every year we present the genebank to hundreds of professionals and lay visitors in Tápiószele. Distribution The National Gene Conservation Strategy sets measures for the accessibility, mobilization and distribution of genebank samples. Increasing and keeping this activity at a high level has become the most important tool for the utilization of the collections. Distribution has been one of the goals of our institute since the beginning (Figure 8). In the first ten years of operation, the genebank disseminated about 5,000 seed samples for plant breeding purposes. Between 2019 and 2023, we registered 10,136 seed requests, from which 9,915 have been fulfilled by shipping 92,100 samples. We operate a separate website for this activity (w ww.mintakeres.hu), which works as a webshop. There are two seed dissemination campaigns each year (one in spring and the other in autumn). The majority of seed distributions (83.85%) are directed to hobby gardeners and farmers, with the remaining part to NGOs, breeding and research institutes (Table 7). According to the research coordinated by the Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN) within the PRO-GRACE consortium in December 2023, the situation is the opposite for the majority of European genebanks for which the majority of distributions are directed to breeding and research institutes (van Hintum, unpublished). For scientific, research-related, educational or cultural seed requests, our whole collection is available in addition to those varieties listed in the webshop. However, in this case, a standard material transfer agreement (SMTA) (Correa, 2006) needs to be signed, and the number of stored propagules should not fall below our critical threshold limit as a result of the request (2,000 seeds on average). The most distributed species in the last five years were paprika (10,289 samples), tomato (9,234 samples), maize (4,225 samples), basil (Ocimum basilicum L.; 1,916 samples) and common bean (1,865 samples). We shipped 425 samples abroad. About 60% of them were requested by research institutes, while the remaining others by hobby gardeners. The number of seed requests reached its peak in 2023, while the number of distributed samples peaked in 2021. We aim to maintain these same high levels of distributions in the future. This is not a profitable activity for our institute since those requesting seeds only have to pay a 5 EUR handling fee. Seed dissemination for research and educational purposes is free of charge. The fruit gardener agreement – ‘Agreement on cooperation in the conservation of fruit varieties long cultivated in the Carpathian Basin and adapted to local circumstances’ – coordinated by NBGK is connected to our fruit varieties collection. This initiative aims at the reintroduction of old fruit varieties, landraces and local varieties to municipal sites, church gardens and schoolyards. Fruit saplings are provided free to the applicants by NBGK. So far a total of 329 gardens have been established throughout the country using 13,728 fruit tree scions. Children are also involved in the process of planting trees, and in this way, the next generations will be more engaged in the conservation of genetic resources (Figure 9). Future plans Our new seed cold storage facilities, opened in 2024, provides the basis for further expansion of our collection. We aim to make full use of this infrastructure and store at least 70,000 accessions within the next few years. We will increase the current number of employees from 130 to 150. We plan to invest in a new building dedicated to in vitro conservation activities and in a new greenhouse suitable for performing research activities and plant physiology analyses. We intend to decrease the average age of our machines, especially tractors, and to obtain new equipment for our laboratory, including a capillary electrophoresis instrument and a huller for glumaceous cereals. These would actively contribute to increasing the number and quality of our scientific publications. We will apply for the registration of many new candidate varieties on the National List of Varieties in the next few years. We would like to further develop our database and elaborate a quality assurance system that is consistent with other European genebanks. Acknowledgements Our activities are supported by the ‘TKP2021-NKA- 03’ project and the ‘Promoting a Plant Genetic Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 25 Figure 7. Participants of the international EUCARPIA conference study hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) plots in the nursery of the genebank in Tápiószele in June 1974. Photo: NBGK Archives. Table 6. An example of biochemical diversity – sugar, crude protein and crude fibre content – of some celeriac varieties maintained in Tápiószele from the harvest of 2022 (all data is the average of three replications, and they refer to dry matter). Name of variety Fructose (g/l ) Glucose (g/l) Sucrose (g/l) Fructose + glucose + sucrose (g/l) Crude protein (%) Crude fibre (%) Albin 0.172 28.175 17.369 45.716 11.78 7.76 Apia 0.138 33.404 27.683 61.225 11.42 8.18 Balder 0.131 34.826 22.008 56.964 14.23 7.40 Brilliant 0.332 30.419 20.702 51.453 10.10 8.80 Bükkzsérci 0.289 30.334 19.081 49.704 13.29 8.98 Erdőhorváti 0.634 30.494 18.268 49.396 11.58 8.56 Frigga 0.052 33.547 28.188 61.788 9.56 8.87 Hegykői 0.130 32.694 25.698 58.523 12.63 7.39 Imperator 0.252 34.446 23.667 58.365 13.26 8.46 Kecskeméti 0.133 31.141 22.745 54.018 11.02 7.99 Kéki 0.219 32.215 17.727 50.161 10.76 7.82 Kisteleki 0.129 36.822 20.417 57.367 11.23 8.04 Maxim 0.027 30.111 27.605 57.744 11.93 8.23 Neon 0.042 29.174 22.858 52.074 10.79 8.14 Nýıregyházi 0.925 37.688 20.200 58.813 11.72 8.15 Prágai óriás 0.157 29.142 16.604 45.903 11.04 8.49 Sótonyi 0.236 33.636 25.449 59.320 9.97 8.90 Taktaharkányi 0.313 43.278 23.438 67.029 13.19 9.27 Tarpai 0.644 32.368 18.054 51.067 12.09 8.94 Trizsi 0.123 31.512 20.378 52.013 12.60 7.72 26 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Figure 8. Propagules disseminated from the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) between 1973 and 2023. End of data collection: 31 December 2023. Table 7. Number of propagule requests and distributed samples by type of requesters between 2019 and 2023. Hobby gardeners Farmers Research institutes Educational institutes NGOs Museums Munici- palities Total Public Private 2019 Requests 1,157 17 15 4 5 5 2 0 1,205 Samples 9,474 58 148 41 31 2,638 1 0 12,391 2020 Requests 1,376 21 3 2 6 3 0 0 1,411 Samples 10,919 99 39 16 191 2,945 0 0 14,209 2021 Requests 2,394 24 2 4 4 1 4 1 2,434 Samples 19,150 259 3 53 58 2,500 42 3 22,068 2022 Requests 2,287 30 3 5 9 4 2 0 2,340 Samples 16,615 134 34 276 321 3,964 25 0 21,369 2023 Requests 2,481 29 8 1 2 1 1 2 2,525 Samples 20,027 487 133 1 58 1,250 2 105 22,063 Total Requests 9,695 121 31 16 26 14 9 3 9,915 Samples 76,185 1,037 357 387 659 13,297 70 108 92,100 Resource Community for Europe – ProGRACE’ project (identification number: 101094738) carried out within the Horizon Europe programme. Declaration The authors declare that the photos do not infringe on any personal or property rights, and that all people shown in the pictures have given their consent for publication. Author contributions Zoltán Áy edited and wrote the paper. Attila Simon con- ceived, designed and performed the analysis. Adrienn Gyurkó collected the data on fruit crops. Evelin Fekete collected the data on horticultural crops. Balázs Horváth collected the data on arable crops. Borbála Baktay col- lected data on the history of the institute. Conflict of interest statement The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speaker’s bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as per- sonal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowl- edge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials dis- cussed in this manuscript. This statement indicates that the above information is true and correct. Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 Hungarian genebank – History, status and outlook 27 Figure 9. Even the youngest ones can be engaged in gene conservation. Planting of landrace fruit saplings provided by the National Centre for Biodiversity and Gene Conservation (NBGK) in Sokorópátka (Northwest Hungary, December 2021). Photo by Balázs Csapó, www.kisalfold.hu References Correa, C. M. (2006). Considerations on the Standard Material Transfer Agreement under the FAO Treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. The Journal of World Intellectual Property . doi: https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00272.x Cromarty, A. S., Ellis, R. H., and Roberts, E. H. (1982). Design of seed storage facilities for genetic conservation. Handbooks for genebanks n.1. (Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources). url: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/104304. Dickie, J. B., Ellis, R. H., Kraak, H. L., Ryder, K., and Tompsett, P. B. (1990). Temperature and seed storage longevity. Annals of Botany 65, 197–204. Engelmann, F. (2011). Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant 47, 5–16. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9327-2 FAO (2014). Genebank Standards for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. url: https://www. fao.org/4/i3704e/i3704e.pdf. Guerrant, E. O., Havens, K., Vitt, P., and Herendeen, P. S. (2014). Sampling for effective ex situ plant conservation. International Journal of Plant Sciences 175(1), 11–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/674131 Gyurkó, A., Baktay, B., Varga, A., and Szani, Z. (2023). Complex evaluation of wild pear. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae – Agriculture and Environment, 15, 66–73. Hannin, D., Codron, J. M., and Thoyer, D. (2006). The International Office of Vine and wine (OIV) and the World Trade Organization (WTO): Standardization Issues In The Wine Sector. In Agricultural Standards. LEAF, ed. Bingen, J. and Bush, L., (Dordrecht: Springer), volume 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007 /1-4020-3984-0 4. Hay, F. R. and Probert, R. J. (2013). Advances in seed conservation of wild plant species: a review of recent research. Conservation Physiology 1, 1–11. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot030 Holly, L., Simon, A., Már, I., M-Csizmadia, G., Kollár, Z., and Hock, Z. (2009). Inventorying and on-farm maintenance of Hungarian landraces. In European landraces on-farm conservation, management and use, ed. Veteläinen, M., Negri, V., and Maxted, N., (Rome: Bioversity International). Bioversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. url: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106154. Jánossy, A. (1971). Ten years of the National Institute of Agrobotany (1959-1969). Agrobotanika 11, 21–21. Jánossy, A. and Lupton, F. G. H. (1974). Heterosis in plant breeding. In Proceedings of the 7th Congress of EUCARPIA. Kis, P., Somogyi, E., Kukri, A., Kovács, D., Áy, Z., and Baktay, B. (2023). Comparison of RAPD and SSR molecular marker methods for classification of khorasan wheat genebank accessions. In Book of abstracts, 7th Conference on Cereal Biotechnology and Breeding, Wernigerode, Germany, 84-84. Nagel, M. and Börner, A. (2010). The longevity of crop seeds stored under ambient conditions. Seedscience Research 20, 1–12. Röder, M. S., Korzun, V., Wendehake, K., Plaschke, J., Tixier, M. H., Leroy, P., and Ganal, M. W. (1998). A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149(4), 2007– 2023. Thormann, I., Engels, J. M. M., and Halewood, M. (2018). Are the old International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) base collections available https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00272.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00272.x https://hdl.handle.net/10568/104304 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9327-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9327-2 https://www.fao.org/4/i3704e/i3704e.pdf https://www.fao.org/4/i3704e/i3704e.pdf https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot030 https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot030 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3984-0_4 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3984-0_4 28 Áy et al Genetic Resources (2025), S2, 13–28 through the Plant Treaty’s multilateral system of access and benefit sharing? A Review. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 66, 291–310. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10722-018-0715-5 UPOV (2005). Guidelines For The Conduct Of Tests For Distinctness, Uniformity And Stability – TG/14/9Apple. url: https://www.upov.int/en/ publications/tg-rom/tg014/tg 14 9.pdf. Walters, C., Richards, C. M., and Volk, G. M. (2018). Genebank conservation of germplasm collected from wild species. In North American Crop Wild Relatives, ed. Greene, S. et al. volume 1, 245-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-018-0715-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-018-0715-5 https://www.upov.int/en/publications/tg-rom/tg014/tg_14_9.pdf https://www.upov.int/en/publications/tg-rom/tg014/tg_14_9.pdf Foundation of the Hungarian genebank Composition and expansion of the collection Multiplication and maintenance of genebank accessions Human resources, infrastructural developments Breeding and maintenance of varieties Hungarian and international scientific and social relations Distribution Future plans Acknowledgements Declaration Author contributions Conflict of interest statement