GENEBANK REPORT Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 DOI: 10.46265/genresj.CWLJ2580 https://www.genresj.org ISSN: 2708-3764 The INRAE Prairies genebank for ex situ conservation of forage and turf species in France Jean-Paul Sampoux *,a,b, Philippe Barre a, Jean-Louis Durand a, Marc Ghesquìere a, Bernadette Julier a, Marie Pégard a,b and Aurélia Priet a,b a INRAE, UR4 (UR P3F), Centre Nouvelle-Aquitaine-Poitiers, F86600 Lusignan, France b INRAE, Biological Resource Centre Prairies (forage and turf species), AgroBRC-RARe, BRC4Plants Abstract: In France, INRAE (Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement - French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment) maintains a genebank of grass and legume perennial species for forage and turf usages in the research unit P3F located in Lusignan (region Nouvelle-Aquitaine). This genebank is a component of the plant pillar (BRC4Plants) of the French National Research Infrastructure RARe. Collections comprise natural populations collected across France and other countries, landraces, cultivars removed from registration lists and some scientific materials. 967 accessions are currently available for distribution, among which 852 are available in the frame of the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-sharing of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The genebank policy has been to set up core collections of the main forage and turf species diversity and to apply a high standard of conservation and regeneration to collections of relatively small size. During past decades, genetic resources held by the genebank highly contributed to the breeding of forage and turf cultivars in France and to various scientific studies. Recently, high-throughput genotyping of accessions has provided unprecedented means to discover phylogeographic patterns and genomic adaptation in natural populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and to understand the breeding history of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Such approaches open promising prospects for future genetic adaptation of forage and turf species to changing environmental conditions and new usages. Keywords: cultivar, grass, grassland, landrace, legume, natural population, perennial species Citation: Sampoux, J. P., Barre, P., Durand, J. L., Ghesquière, M., Julier, B., Pégard, M., Priet, A. (2025). The INRAE Prairies genebank for ex situ conservation of forage and turf species in France. Genetic Resources (S2), 106–118. doi: 10.46265/genresj.CWLJ2580. © Copyright 2025 the Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Sown temporary grasslands cover around 2.47 million hectares in France (Huyghe et al, 2014). They provide grazed or cut forage for livestock but also various other ecosystemic services such as soil fertility improvement, carbon sequestration and biodiversity shelter (Martin et al, 2020). Sown grasslands are seeded with improved cultivars from various perennial grass and legume species. Most of these species commonly grow as natural populations in permanent and natural grasslands covering 9.8 million hectares in France (Huyghe et al, ∗Corresponding author: Jean Paul Sampoux (jean-paul.sampoux@inrae.fr) 2014) and exhibit a diversity of ecotypes adapted to various conditions of soil, climate and use. Only few species, e.g. lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.), were bred as landraces before the onset of modern plant breeding. Natural populations and landraces were the starting material to develop continuously improved cultivars adapted to various pedoclimatic conditions and forage systems, e.g. Sampoux et al (2011) for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Grown as grass–legume binary associations, or as mixtures involving several species (up to ten or more), temporary grasslands can provide a high yield of good quality forage without artificial nitrogen and herbicide inputs (Surault et al, 2024). Furthermore, some grass species have also been Received: 03.11.2024 Accepted: 24.01.2025 Published online: 11.03.2025 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.CWLJ2580 https://www.genresj.org https://www.doi.org/10.46265/genresj.CWLJ2580 mailto:jean-paul.sampoux@inrae.fr Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 107 bred for small size, high density and slow growth to create turf cultivars improved for either sport or lawn requirements (e.g. Sampoux et al (2012)). The breeding of turf-type genotypes of legume species, e.g. white clover (Trifolium repens L.), lucerne (M. sativa), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), has also recently begun. Finally, all grassland and lawn areas contribute to providing pleasant landscapes for recreational activities. The INRAE multidisciplinary research unit for grass- lands and forage species (UR P3F) in Lusignan hosts the Prairies genebank targeted to the conservation of genetic resources of the main grass and legume species sown in France for either forage or turf usage (Figure 1). Genetic materials maintained by the Prairies genebank Collections of natural populations from grass and legume species of the Prairies genebank are the out- come of collection trips undertaken by scientists of INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, for- mer acronym of INRAE) in France and other coun- tries. Some of these collection trips were undertaken by INRA staff alone and others together with academic research institutes from other countries (e.g. Spain, Por- tugal, Morocco, Algeria, USA) or breeding companies. Most of the seed-collecting trips were carried out from 1970 to 1990 to gather samples of genetic resources necessary to start or diversify breeding programmes. Since then, the long-term conservation and character- ization of collected accessions have been progressively implemented (Prospéri and Sampoux, 2005). A more recent collecting campaign carried out in the southern part of France in 2014 gave the opportunity to collect new accessions from the natural diversity of grass and legume species that were afterwards included in the genebank besides already existing collections. The genebank also maintains some lucerne landraces, as well as some grass and legume historical cultivars formerly bred by INRAE or other breeders, all removed from national lists. As a matter of fact, in France and other European countries, the commercialization of new cultivars is allowed only after their registration on national lists, which depends on sufficient value for cultivation and use (VCU) and distinctiveness, unifor- mity and stability (DUS) requirements. After a certain duration (usually ten years), cultivars are removed from national lists unless they have not been outpaced by more recent cultivars (see for examples rules in France at www.geves.fr/variety-seed-expertise/field-forage/re gistration-of-field-and-forage-varieties-in-the-french-cat alogue). Collection of orchard grass Natural populations A breeding programme for orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) started in 1962 at INRA in Lusignan. The programme focused on the improvement of forage performances in the temperate climate areas of Europe. An early start of vegetative growth in spring and a relatively late spike emergence date were targeted, as they were expected to provide a long annual period of forage production. Thus, collection campaigns from 1962 to 1982 were directed towards oceanic regions of Europe with mild winter and cool summer conditions, i.e. Brittany and Cotentin in France, northwestern Spain and northern Portugal (Mousset, 2000). Populations from the widespread autotetraploid (4x = 28) taxon D. glomerata subsp. glomerata were collected in France, Spain and Portugal. Populations of the rare diploid taxon (2x = 14) D. glomerata subsp. lusitanica Stebbins & D. Zohary were found in Portugal and populations of Galician type (Ortiz and Rodriguez-Oubiña, 1993), either diploid or tetraploid, were found in Spain and Portugal. The autotetraploid materials thus collected were used by the INRA plant breeding unit of Lusignan to create several successive innovative cultivars: ‘Lully’ (1977), ‘Lude’ and ‘Lutétia’ (1978), ‘Lupré’ (1992), ‘Ludac’ (1997), ‘Luron’ and ‘Ludovic’ (1998). Many orchard grass cultivars currently available from private breeding companies for oceanic climates in Europe still stem from these original collections. Later, from 1987 to 1992, new collections were undertaken to collect Mediterranean types of orchard grass offering some winter growth potential and more or less substantial summer dormancy in southern France, southern Portugal, southern Spain and Algeria (Mousset, 2000). Thereby, populations were collected from the widespread autotetraploid taxon D. glomerata subsp. hispanica (Roth) Nyman and from the diploid taxa D. glomerata subsp. castellata Borrill & Parker and D. glomerata subsp. mairei Stebbins & D. Zohary. The autotetraploid collected materials were used by the INRA plant breeding unit in Montpellier to select the cultivar ‘Medly’ (1996), which presents adaption to summer drought and heat stresses of Mediterranean areas. A total of 702 orchard grass natural populations were collected between 1962 and 1992. A core collection of 172 populations sampling the variability within the different taxa was extracted from this large set and is currently available from the Prairies genebank. The new collection campaign undertaken in 2014 in the southern part of France enabled the collection of 39 new natural populations of the autotraploid D. glomerata subsp. glomerata. These new entries added to the previously mentioned core collection to make the set of orchard grass natural accessions currently available from the Prairies genebank (Figure 2 and Table 1). Other genetic materials Accessions publicly available from the genebank also include the D. glomerata subsp. glomerata cultivars ‘Floréal’ (1957), ‘Lully’ and ‘Lutetia’, formerly bred by INRA. 108 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 Figure 1. Implementation of different tasks in the facilities of the INRAE Prairies genebank. A, Growing grass plantlets in the greenhouse prior to planting accessions in spaced spots in a triticale (x Triticosecale)–rye (Secale cereale L.) field; B, Growing grass plants in trays prior to transfer in confined compartments of a partitioned greenhouse; C, Grass accessions planted in spaced spots within a triticale–rye crop which acts as a pollen barrier; D, Growing lucerne (M. sativa) plants in pots prior to planting under insect proof tents; E1, Insect-proof tents used to perform legume cross-pollinations; E2, A lucerne accession under an insect-proof tent (pollen transport inside the tent is ensured by bumblebees); F, Storage of active seed lots in a cold room (5◦C and 30% hygrometry); G, Storage of safety seed lots in a freezer (-20◦C). Collection of tall fescue Natural populations Several hundred natural populations of tall fescue (Fes- tuca arundinacea Schreb.) were collected by scientists of INRA Lusignan from 1969 to 1992 (Ghesquière and Jadas-Hécart, 1995). Collection campaigns focused towards southern France and the Mediterranean basin (northern Africa, Portugal). The collected populations were then characterized at INRA Lusignan from 1985 to 1995 and a core collection of 128 accessions sam- pling the diversity of the different taxa was drawn up. This core collection included accessions from the com- mon allohexaploid (6x = 42) tall fescue (F. arundinacea subsp. arundinacea) collected in France, Portugal and Switzerland (77 accessions) and in northern Africa (34 accessions). Sources of Festuca arundinacea subsp. arun- dinacea from temperate areas and the Mediterranean part of France were discovered to give deeply sterile hybrids with Mediterranean sources from southern Por- tugal, southern Spain and northern Africa (see Jadas- Hécart and Gillet (1978) for the production of tem- perate x Mediterranean amphiploid cultivars). The core collection was also supplemented with accessions from two other northern African types, three from F. arundi- nacea var. atlantigena (St.-Yves) Auquier (octoploid, 8x = 56) and 14 from F. arundinacea var. letourneuxiana (St.-Yves) Torrecilla (decaploid, 10x = 70). Five accessions of F. arundinacea var. glaucescens Boiss. are also maintained in the genebank. They result from the pooling of various natural populations of this taxon collected around lake Embrun in the French Alps in 1982. This taxon, which is autotetraploid (4x = 28), has been recognized as one of the two progenitors of the hexaploid tall fescue F. arundinacea subsp. arundinacea together with the diploid (2x = 14) Festuca pratensis Huds. after natural amphiploidization (Humphreys et al, 1995). F. arundinacea var. glaucescens was widely used by the INRA plant breeding unit of Lusignan from the 1980s onwards in hybridization with autotetraploid ryegrasses to create the first x Festulolium varieties (Ghesquière et al, 2010). The collection campaign carried out in France in 2014 provided 36 new natural populations of the tall fescue F. arundinacea subsp. arundinacea. The historical core collection of 128 accessions, supplemented by accessions from F. arundinacea var. glaucescens and accessions collected in 2014 make the set of tall fescue natural populations available from the Prairies genebank (Figure 3 and Table 1). Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 109 Figure 2. Geographical distribution of D. glomerata natural populations maintained by the Prairies genebank. In the background, isothermality is the ratio ‘temperature diurnal range/temperature annual range’ in percentage. Values are computed from 1989–2010 climate norms. High isothemality values are typical of oceanic temperate climate whereas low values are typical of continental climate. Credit: Fabien Sampoux, project ColNat Fourrage+ (AAC RPG 2018-2 CTPS GNIS) Other genetic materials Several x Festulolium accessions created by the INRAE plant breeding unit of Lusignan are maintained. This includes three amphiploid cultivars created after hybridization between F. arundinacea var. glaucescens genotypes and Lolium multiflorum tetraploid genotypes, namely ‘Lueur’ (2007), ‘Luxane’ (2008) and ‘Lusilium’ (2008). This also includes several pools obtained from the backcross of amphiploid (F. arundinacea var. glaucescens × L. multiflorum) material into tetraploid L. multiflorum or Lolium perenne materials. Accessions publicly available from the genebank also include the F. arundinacea subsp. arundinacea cultivars ‘Gloria’ (1976), ‘Lubrette’ (1981) and ‘Ludical’ (2002) bred by INRA. Collection of ryegrasses Natural populations In 1983 and 1984, the INRA plant breeding unit of Clermont-Ferrand, together with the breeding compa- nies of ACVF (Association des Créateurs de Variétés Four- ragères – Society of plant breeding companies involved in the breeding of forage and turf cultivars in France), undertook a dense and even collection of more than 500 natural populations (diploid, 2x = 14) of peren- nial ryegrass (L. perenne) across France. These popula- tions were thoroughly characterized at INRA Clermont- Ferrand during the following years (Charmet et al, 1990), providing data to reveal informative relation- ships between characterization traits and ecogeographi- cal variables at the sites of origin of the populations (Bal- fourier and Charmet, 1991). The collected materials pro- vided the sources to create the cultivar ‘Clerpin’ (1996) by the INRA plant breeding unit of Clermont-Ferrand and were the root of a substantial leap in the release of perennial ryegrass cultivars with late heading date and improved crown rust resistance by private breed- ing companies. A core collection of 160 accessions was finally set up using a clustering based on characteriza- tion data combined with a geostatistics contiguity con- straint (Charmet and Balfourier, 1995). In 2008, this core collection was transferred to the Prairies genebank in Lusignan which is maintaining it. The whole set of perennial ryegrass natural popula- tions maintained by the genebank also includes 27 other natural populations collected in France at diverse times as well as 36 natural populations collected during the 2014 collection campaign in southern France (Figure 4 and Table 1). The 2014 collection campaign also gave the opportunity to collect seven spontaneous popula- 110 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 Table 1. Number of accessions per species made publicly available by the Prairies genebank in 2024. ∗, The whole set of 852 accessions proposed for notification by France as Contracting Party to the Multilateral System (MLS) of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA ) comprises three different subsets: 1) a subset of 531 accessions maintained by INRAE (Prairies genebank) and notified to the MLS in 2014, 2) a subset of 146 accessions maintained by INRAE (Prairies genebank) and 3) a subset of 175 accessions maintained by INRAE (Prairies genebank) and ACVF (society of companies breeding forage and turf species in France), 2) and 3) proposed in 2024 to the French Ministry of Agriculture for notification to the MLS. The subsets of 531 and 175 accessions can already be browsed on the public databases EURISCO, Florilège and Siregal. The subset of 146 accessions is currently in the process of addition to these databases. a, Accessions whose occurrence data were forwarded to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) database are a subset of the set of accessions proposed for notification to the MLS of the ITPGRFA. b, 52 perennial ryegrass cultivars, 27 Phalaris accessions and 3 x Festulolium cultivars are currently in the process of seed regeneration and will be afterwards added to the public databases Siregal, Florilège and EURISCO. Species in collection Number of accessions Latin name Vernacular name Natural pop. Landraces Cultivars EURISCO Florilège Siregal Proposed to MLS of TIRPAA* GBIFa Dactylis glomerata Orchard grass 211 3 175 214 172 Lolium perenne Perennial ryegrass 223 54b 193 206 191 Lolium multiflorum Italian ryegrass 7 2 2 9 Lolium hybridum 1 1 1 Festuca arundinacea Tall fescue 169 3 128 164 Festuca pratensis Meadow fescue 11 11 x Festulolium 3b Festuca rubra aggr. Red fescues 139 3 142 142 139 Festuca ovina aggr. Sheep fescues 35 35 35 35 Phleum pratense Timothy 2 2 2 Phalaris arundinacea Phalaris 27b Phalaris aquatica Medicago sativa Lucerne 12 17 25 41 48 Trifolium pratense Red clover 2 3 3 5 Trifolium repens White clover 6 4 4 10 Onobrychis viciifolia Sainfoin 2 2 2 Vicia sativa Vetch 3 3 3 Total 842 17 108 731 852 537 tions (diploid, 2x = 14) of Italian ryegrass (L. multiflo- rum) in natural grasslands. Other genetic materials Accessions publicly available from the Prairies genebank also include the perennial ryegrass cultivars ‘Primevère’ (1957) and ‘Clerpin’ and the Italian ryegrass cultivars ‘Lutil’ (1972) and ‘Rina’ (early 1960s), all bred by INRA. Furthermore, a set of 52 perennial ryegrass cultivars from different breeding origins was gathered in 2005 to represent the history of modern breeding in this species for forage and turf usages. This set was used to experimentally assess the genetic improvement for these two usages (Sampoux et al, 2011, 2012) and it is currently in the process of seed regeneration in order to make it publicly available. Collection of fine-leaved fescues Natural populations An extensive collection was performed for fine-leaved fescues by the INRA plant breeding unit of Lusignan and breeding companies of ACVF in 1993 and 1994. More than 500 natural populations from red fescue (Stace, 1980) and sheep fescue (Wilkinson and Stace, 1991) taxa were collected across France. During the following years, they were characterized, evaluated for turf per- formances in dense swards and regenerated. Sampoux and Huyghe (2009) showed that the summer water bal- ance, soil texture and land use were the main environ- mental variables differentiating the realized niches of the inland taxa, i.e. the caespitose red fescue taxon Fes- tuca nigrescens Lam. (hexaploid, 6x = 42), the strong creeping (abundant long rhizomes) red fescue taxa Fes- tuca rubra subsp. fallax (Thuill.) Nyman (octoploid, 8x = 56) and F. rubra L. subsp. rubra (hexaploid, 6x = 42) and various Festuca ovina L. taxa with karyotype varying from diploids (2x = 14) to octoploids (8x = 56). Sam- poux and Huyghe (2009) also highlighted that the dif- ferentiation of inland taxa for adaptive traits contributed more than their ploidy level variation to the diversity of their realized niches (Hutchinson, 1957). Coastal popu- lations of red fescues were also collected along the Chan- nel coast. Hexaploid (6x = 42) slender creeping (few short rhizomes) red fescues were found on salt marshes (green F. rubra subsp. litoralis (G.Mey.) Auquier) and Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 111 Figure 3. Geographical distribution of F. arundinacea natural populations maintained by the Prairies genebank. In the background, the water balance is the cumulated rainfall minus the cumulated evapotranspiration of June, July and August. Values are computed from 1989–2010 climate norms. Credit: Fabien Sampoux, project ColNat Fourrage+ (AAC RPG 2018-2 CTPS GNIS) on calcareous cliffs (glaucous F. rubra subsp. pruinosa (Hack.) Piper), and an octoploid (8x = 56) strong creep- ing red fescue (F. rubra subsp. arenaria (Osbeck) Syme) was found on sand dunes. During the years after collec- tion, the populations of inland and coastal fine-leaved fescue taxa were extensively used by breeding compa- nies in France to select new cultivars for turf usage. A core collection of 170 accessions was identified by selecting populations sampling the environmental range of each taxon (Figure 5) and it now makes the set of fine-leaved fescues natural populations available from the Prairies genebank (Table 1). Other genetic materials Accessions publicly available from the genebank also include the F. rubra subsp. fallax cultivars ‘Ludivine’ (1981) and ‘Milda’ (1975) and the F. rubra subsp. pruinosa cultivar ‘Luciole’ (2002), all formerly bred by INRA. Collection of lucerne History of the collection The cultivated lucerne (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa) is not present with natural populations in France, except some feral populations escaped from sown stands. How- ever, some wild populations of the spontaneous sub- species Medicago sativa subsp. falcata (L.) Arcang. and Medicago sativa subsp. glomerata (Balb.) Rouy can be found in northeastern and southeastern France, respec- tively (Julier, 1996). Lucerne as a forage crop (the sub- species sativa) was introduced in France in the 16th cen- tury from Spain (Michaud et al, 1988). Since then, tra- ditional breeding has been applied on farm in almost all regions of France, producing landraces. Seed exchanges were frequent among different regions and with foreign countries (Julier, 1996). Hybridization between culti- vated landraces of the subspecies sativa and wild pop- ulations of the subspecies falcata, naturally occurring in continental Europe, conferred frost resistance and varie- gated flower colour to cultivated populations. The first collections of landraces were set up during the first half of the 20th century by the plant breeding station of Ver- sailles, a precursor of INRA, which delivered an exten- sive phenotypic description of them (Alabouvette and Méneret, 1935; Mayer et al, 1951). These studies and that of Demarly (1957) concluded that six main types of cultivated lucerne were present in France: ‘Provence’ in the south-east, ‘Poitou’, ‘Marais de Luçon’ and ‘Marais de Challans’ in the centre-west, ‘Flamande’ (or ‘Flemish’) in the north and ‘Ormelong’ in the south of the Paris Basin. These six types differentiated for traits like tap root, kidney-shaped seeds, pod coil numbers and frost resistance and for the frequency of plants with varie- 112 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 Figure 4. Geographical distribution of L. perenne natural populations maintained by the Prairies genebank. In the background, isothermality is the ratio ‘temperature diurnal range/temperature annual range’ in percentage. Values are computed from 1989–2010 climate norms. High isothemality values are typical of oceanic temperate climate whereas low values are typical of continental climate. Credit: Fabien Sampoux, project ColNat Fourrage+ (AAC RPG 2018-2 CTPS GNIS) gated flowers (Julier, 1996). They were used to initiate breeding programmes and the very first registered culti- vars (e.g. ‘Du Puits’) were produced after a brief selec- tion in ‘Flamande’. The six types of French landraces were transferred to the INRA forage plant breeding unit in Lusignan at its creation in 1960. In order to widen the genetic basis of its lucerne breeding programmes, the plant breeding unit of Lusignan received various cultivars, landraces and also wild populations from different countries in Europe, North Africa and America. A few of them were included in the genetic resources made publicly available, in agreement with provider requirements and plant breeding rights. As a noticeable event, a collection trip was undertaken by the INRA plant breeding unit of Lusigan in 1985 in Lorraine (east of France) after a witness mentioned the presence of some prostrate, yellow-flowered lucerne populations in this region. Two populations, named ‘Malzeville’ and ‘Marron’, were collected and multiplied, and a smooth selection was applied to remove cultivated off-types. These populations turned out to be typical of the Eurasian continental subspecies falcata. Furthermore, from 1985 to 1987, scientists of the INRA plant breeding unit of Montpellier organized collection trips in Spain and Portugal to collect wild populations of lucerne, also named ’Mielga’ populations (Prosperi et al, 1989). These populations, mainly located on roadsides and low- input grasslands, had a prostrate growth habit but their violet flower colour attested to their relatedness to the subspecies sativa. The phenotypic description of these wild populations showed various levels of introgression by cultivated materials (Prosperi et al, 2006). Some ‘Mielga’ genetic materials are currently available in the Prairies genebank (see below). Several studies, carried out by the INRAE plant breeding unit of Lusignan, provided extended analyses of the phenotypic and genetic diversity of lucerne genetic resources, including cultivars, landraces and natural populations (Julier et al, 1995; Crochemore et al, 1998; Herrmann et al, 2018; Pégard et al, 2023a). Genetic resources currently available The numbers of landraces, natural populations and cultivars maintained by the Prairies genebank are reported in Table 1. The landrace accessions include the six original French landrace types (see above) as well as several landraces from northern Africa. The natural populations comprise five M. sativa subsp. falcata accessions including the ‘Malzeville’ and ‘Marron’ populations, one M. sativa subsp. glomerata accession as well as seven M. sativa subsp. sativa accessions including Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 113 Figure 5. Geographical distribution of Festuca rubra aggr. and Festuca ovina aggr. natural populations maintained by the Prairies genebank. In the background, the water balance is the cumulated rainfall minus the cumulated evapotranspiration of June, July and August. Values are computed from 1989–2010 climate norms. Credit: Fabien Sampoux, project ColNat Fourrage+ (AAC RPG 2018-2 CTPS GNIS) five ’Mielga’ populations from Spain. Note that a large set of ‘Mielga’ accessions has recently been transferred from INRAE Montpellier to the Prairies genebank in Lusignan but these accessions are not currently ready for distribution. There are 25 M. sativa subsp. sativa cultivars maintained by the genebank. They notably include several historical cultivars formerly grown in France, i.e. cultivars ‘Coussouls’ (1998), ‘Janine’ (1974), ‘Luciole’ (1965), ‘Luisante’ (1998), ‘Lutèce’ (1976), ‘Luxor ‘(1977), ‘Mireille’ (1971) bred by INRA, cultivar ‘Medalfa’ (1988) bred by INRA and ACVF, and cultivars ‘Du Puits’ (1950), ‘Gamma’ (1952), ‘Glacier’ (1975), ‘Elga’ (1964), ‘Emeraude’ (1952), ‘Etoile du Nord’ (1965), ‘Hybride de Crécy’ (1974), ‘Polder’ (1972), ‘Prima’ (1963), ‘Oméga’ (1952), ‘Orchésienne’ (1952), ‘Verneuil’ (1968) bred by private breeders. Other genetic materials in collections The seed-collecting campaign carried out in 2014 to collect natural populations of grass and legume species in southern France (see previous paragraphs) also enabled the collection of 11 populations of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis), two populations of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and six populations of white clover (Trifolium repens). In 2017, another collecting trip enabled the collection of 27 Phalaris natural populations (Phalaris arundinacea L. and Phalaris aquatica L.) in southern France and Corsica, which are currently in the process of seed regeneration. Finally, the genebank maintains a small number of cultivars of red and white clovers, thimothy (Phleum pratense L.), vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and sainfoin (Onybrychis viciifolia Scop.), all from INRA breeding. Practical organization of the Prairies genebank In 2008, the INRAE research unit UR P3F formally set up the Prairies genebank on its operational site in Lusignan in order to gather genetic resources of forage and turf species previously maintained in several INRAE sites across France. During the following years, substantial investments were achieved to equip the genebank with renewed facilities such as cold rooms for seed storage and a partitioned greenhouse to grow accessions in pollen isolation. Accessions were inventoried and a database was created to record all necessary information (passport data of accessions, quality and quantity of seed lots, characterization and evaluation data) and to trace the activity (seed quality control, seed regenerations, seed distributions, etc.). 114 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 For each accession, seeds harvested after a regener- ation event are split into three seed lots: an active lot weighing from 200 to 800g which is stored in a cold room (+5◦C and 30% hygrometry), a 20 to 30g safety lot stored at -20◦C, and a 1 to 2g long-term conservation lot stored at -20◦C in a different freezer than the safety lots. The genebank maintains active and safety seed lots only from the most recent regeneration event and long- term seed lots from all successive regeneration events and the initial seed batch introduced in the genebank. Germination tests are performed every three years on active lots, if they are not replaced by lots from a new regeneration event, as well as on safety seed lots if the germination percentage of active seed lots is below the established thresholds. Active and safety seed lots are regenerated when the germination percentage of active seed lots falls below 80%, i.e. every 10 to 15 years. Species maintained in the genebank are allogamous and more or less self-incompatible. Because of this sex- ual reproduction biology, natural populations, landraces and cultivars (synthetic varieties) from these species are polygenotypic populations in principle at panmictic equilibrium. Therefore, the regeneration of accessions from these different kinds of genetic materials is per- formed by intercrossing a number of plants expected as sufficient to avoid genetic drift (i.e. 100 to 250 plants) in pollen isolation from any plant from the same species not belonging to the accession. Different means are implemented to ensure pollen isolation. In field condi- tions, accessions from grass species are grown in spaced spots within a triticale–rye crop which acts as a pollen barrier. Another way to achieve pollen isolation is the use of pollen-proof (for anemophilous grasses) or insect- proof (for entomophilous legumes) tents and a parti- tioned greenhouse with 12 confined compartments. To date, 731 accessions made publicly available for sample delivery (Table 1) can be browsed online on the Siregal website of the Biology and Plant breeding department of INRAE (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/s iregal), on the Florilege website (https://florilege.a rcad-project.org/fr/collections) set up by the plant pillar (BRC4Plants) of the French National Research Infrastructure RARe (Bergheaud et al, 2025) and on the website of the European Search Catalogue for Plant Genetic Resources EURISCO (https://eurisco.ecpgr.org ) with the holding institute field filled in as FRA001. These databases will be soon updated with the recently introduced accessions still missing in their records. All the species maintained in the Prairies genebank are listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA). Therefore, 531 of the publicly available accessions were notified in 2014 as a contribution of France to the Multilateral System of the ITPGRFA. An additional set of 321 accessions has been proposed in 2024 for further contribution to the Multilateral System (Table 1). Furthermore, passport data of 537 accessions from the natural diversity of grass species have been uploaded to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) database (https://www.gbif.org/publisher/0b5846f7-2 0b5-410a-93c5-5de83b522deb). The Prairies genebank was labelled as a Biological Resource Centre by the network IBiSA (French network of biology, health and agronomy infrastructures) in 2011 and approved as a genebank of the plant pillar of the French National Research Infrastructure RARe in 2021. It was furthermore officially recognized as a curator of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture by the French Ministry of Agriculture in 2020. The Prairies genebank manages the French network for conservation of forage and turf species genetic resources, which includes INRAE and private companies actively breeding these species in France. In 2023, the Prairies genebank as well as the biotechnology and chemistry facilities of UR P3F were acknowledged for ISO9001:2015 certification. Over the five last years, the Prairies genebank has dis- tributed around 1,300 seed samples to various recip- ients, which were, by decreasing order of magni- tude, French and foreign academic research institutions, French and foreign plant breeding companies, farmers and hobby-growers. Uniqueness of the collections The collections of natural populations maintained by the Prairies genebank originate from areas not or lit- tle represented in other genebanks. Notably, most of the grass and lucerne populations from northern Africa kept by the genebank are not maintained in their coun- try of origin, and sometimes do not grow anymore in their site of origin, because of changes in climate and land use, excessive grazing or replacement by cultivars from modern breeding. Recent collections of natural populations undertaken by the INRAE research unit UR P3F in France and other European countries have con- firmed that the in situ conservation of these popula- tions is often threatened by the continuous regression of natural and permanent grasslands, climate change, and the corruption of their genetic integrity by over- seeding with unrelated cultivars. The ex situ collec- tions of grass and legume natural populations main- tained by the Prairies genebank thus make a unique, although non-exhaustive, contribution to the preserva- tion of the genetic diversity of these species. Further- more, the Prairies genebank is the only repository of INRAE cultivars removed from national lists. However, the polygenotypic nature and the allogamous sexual reproduction of forage and turf species make the seed regeneration of accessions costly, even though the seed market for these species, and consequently the means for genetic resources conservation, are relatively lim- ited. International networks of genebanks, like the For- ages Working Group of the European Cooperative Pro- gramme for Plant Genetic Resources (ECPGR), are thus essential to share conservation efforts in these species. In the coming years, the Prairies genebank will aim to achieve a better sampling of the French heritage for genetic resources of forage and turf species in its collec- Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 115 tions. Present collections of orchard grass and tall fescue natural populations only sample a limited part of the French territory, and it will be aimed to complete the collections through new sampling campaigns in regions not visited so far. It will also be considered to sample the French natural diversity of legume species, such as white and red clover. Another important goal will be to work towards a more representative collection of culti- vars, bred by INRAE and also other breeders, that were grown in France since the 1950s for all forage and turf species that had significant use. Valorization of the collections Initially set up to have genetic resources available to start breeding programmes, collections of natural pop- ulations may provide relevant materials to study the environmental distribution of inter- and intra-specific plant diversity. In this respect, 167 scientific papers from various international institutions have to date used the occurrence data of grass species forwarded by the Prairies genebank to the GBIF database. The main asset of these collections is their capacity to supplement occurrence data with phenotypic and genomic infor- mation already existing or newly generated. Earlier in this paper, we reported the use of phenotypic data to document adaptive differentiation in fine-leaved fes- cue taxa (Sampoux and Huyghe, 2009) and adaptive variability within perennial ryegrass (Balfourier and Charmet, 1991). More recently, the FACCE-JPI ERA- NET+ (https://www.faccejpi.net/en/faccejpi/actions/c ore-theme-1/facce-era-net-plus-on-climate-smart-agricu lture.htm) project GrassLandscape gathered INRAE, IPK (Leibniz Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzen- forschung - Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Germany), IBERS (Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Wales, United King- dom) and ILVO (Instituut voor Landbouw-, Visserij- en Voedingsonderzoek - Flanders Research Institute for Agri- culture, Fisheries and Food, Belgium) to implement phylogeographic and landscape genomics analyses on a set of 470 accessions from the natural diversity of perennial ryegrass provided by 15 genebanks from European countries and the USDA. High throughput genotyping of these accessions allowed for the recon- struction of the expansion history of perennial ryegrass across Europe (Blanco-Pastor et al, 2019). Then, a mul- tivariate landscape genomics analysis retrieved 633 potentially adaptive loci associated with either winter cold or summer drought and heat stresses and pointed phenotypic traits putatively conferring adaptation to these stresses (Blanco-Pastor et al, 2020). The adap- tive relevance of these traits was further confirmed by a functional ecology approach (Keep et al, 2021). Results of the project GrassLandscape were then used to set up a European core collection of perennial rye- grass natural populations within the frame of an ECPGR Activity (Keep et al, 2020; Sampoux and Willner, 2022). Adaptive phenotypic and genomic variations revealed by the project GrassLandscape have furthermore been used to assess the future of perennial ryegrass local populations exposed to climate change by implementing genomic offset analyses (Pégard et al, 2023b). For other forage species than perennial ryegrass, collections main- tained in European genebanks, and beyond, could likely provide sufficiently wide sets of natural populations to set up environmental niche models of species (Sampoux and Badeau, 2009) and reveal adaptive phenotypic and genomic diversities within species (see for exam- ple Boller et al (2010) for genetic resources and diver- sity in forage species). This information could be used to implement predictive analyses, such as genomic offset analyses, to foresee spatial shifts of adaptive diversity required for adaptation to ongoing changes in climate and other environmental factors (Fitzpatrick et al, 2021; Gougherty et al, 2021; Hung et al, 2023; Aitken et al, 2024; Zou et al, 2024). On this basis, strategies for in situ conservation could be developed, taking into account ongoing environmental changes on a European scale. For most forage and turf species that can spontaneously persist and evolve in long-duration grasslands, in situ conservation planned in this way would be the cheapest and most sustainable means to maintain valuable func- tional and adaptive genetic diversity in the long term. Incorporating adaption to future environmental changes across territories in in situ conservation programmes would contribute to maintaining an economically viable forage production on involved grasslands that would thus help the sustainability of these programmes. Results of the project Grasslandscape also showed that the diversity of perennial ryegrass forage cultivars currently grown worldwide represents only a small part of the natural diversity of the species (Blanco-Pastor et al, 2019). Moreover, the H2020 European project EUCLEG (www.eucleg.eu) led by UR P3F studied a worldwide set of lucerne landraces and cultivars, which revealed clear phenotypic and genomic differentiation related to geographic origin and evidence that the cultivar diversity grown in Europe represents a limited part of the whole genetic diversity of the species (Pégard et al, 2023a). These results suggest that natural diversity, landraces and old cultivars of forage and turf species may still provide potentially useful genetic variability to adapt grown cultivars to upcoming challenges. Such genetic resources may be useful sources to adapt species to new combinations of climate constraints (Blanco- Pastor et al, 2020) and to improve their tolerance or resistance to biotic stresses (Sampoux and Badeau, 2009; Annicchiarico et al, 2015). They could also be valuable sources to develop cultivars adapted to cultivation in species mixtures. During the last five decades, forage and turf species have intensively been bred for performances in pure stands and it may be assumed that phenotypes more adapted to interactions prevailing in species mixtures (Litrico and Violle, 2015; Sampoux et al, 2020) could be recovered from natural diversity or genetic material that experienced only limited breeding (e.g. old cultivars). Furthermore, with the transition to agroecological practices, some forage 116 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 species have emerged as service crops. They could be used as intermediary cover crops, e.g. Italian ryegrass, or as perennial living mulches, e.g. lucerne, red and white clovers, sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). Cultivars bred for forage usage are probably not the best-adapted materials for these new uses (El-Ghazzal et al, 2024) and genetic resources may help to breed more suitable phenotypes. However, introgressing allele diversity from raw genetic resources to elite cultivars may have become more and more challenging as continuously improved cultivars have been released. This may especially be the case for the allogamous and partially auto-incompatible forage and turf species, for which it can be assumed that the alleviation of the genetic load has been a sub- stantial part of the genetic improvement (Kimbeng and Bingham, 1998; Annicchiarico et al, 2015). Genotyp- ing based on genome sequencing should be expected to help the efficient introgression of desirable multi- genic features from genetic resources to elite germplasm within a reasonable timespan. While investigations such as the ones of the project GrassLandscape have proven that collections of natural populations can be used to reveal the signature of natural selection (loci whose allele frequency variation departs from neutral expec- tations), it could be expected that collections of culti- vars punctuating the history of modern breeding may reveal the signature of artificial breeding (see for exam- ple Welcker et al (2022) for such approach in maize). Marker-assisted selection methods could then possibly be designed to optimize favourable allele frequencies at both loci involved in desirable natural adaptations and loci that determine agronomic performances in the cul- tivars of forage and turf species, essentially bred as syn- thetics. Efforts to broaden, phenotype and genotype the collections of the Prairies genebank are to be conceived in order to contribute in these directions. Author contributions The manuscript was written by JPS with contributions from BJ and MG. All authors reviewed and commented the manuscript and approved the final version. Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. References Aitken, S. N., Jordan, R., and Tumas, H. R. (2024). Conserving evolutionary potential: combining land- scape genomics with established methods to inform plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 75, 707– 736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant- 070523-044239 Alabouvette, L. and Méneret, G. (1935). Importance du choix des provenances de luzerne. Orientation à donner à la production des semences de luzerne en France. Ann. Agron. Mai-Juin, 1–39. Annicchiarico, P., Barrett, B., Brummer, E. C., Julier, B., and Marshall, A. H. (2015). Achievements and challenges in improving temperate perennial forage legumes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci 34, 327–380. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.898462 Balfourier, F. and Charmet, G. (1991). Relationships between agronomic characters and ecogeographical factors in a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations. Agronomie 11, 645–657. Bergheaud, V., Audergon, J. M., Bellec, A., Delaunay, A., Duminil, J., Dussert, S., Esnault, F., Geoffriau, E., Gouesnard, B., Jenny, C., Label, A., Lashermes, P., Maghnaoui, N., Nuissier, F., Priet, A., Rieucau, V., Térès, P., Paulo-De-La-Réberdiere, V., Vincent, M., and Adam-Blondon, A. F. (2025). Organization of plant Biological Resource Centers for research in France: History, evolution and current status. Genetic Resources (S2), 78–90. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.46265/genresj.ASZO2413 Blanco-Pastor, J. L., Barre, P., Keep, T., Ledauphin, T., Escobar-Gutiérrez, A., Roschanski, A. M., Willner, E., Dehmer, K. J., Hegarty, M. J., Muylle, H., Veeckman, E., Vandepoele, K., Ruttink, T., Roldán-Ruiz, I., Manel, S., and Sampoux, J. P. (2020). Canonical correlations reveal adaptive loci and phenotypic responses to climate in perennial ryegrass. Mol. Ecol. Resour 21, 849–870. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998. 13289 Blanco-Pastor, J. L., Manel, S., Barre, P., Roschanski, A. M., Willner, E., Dehmer, K. J., Hegarty, M., Muylle, H., Ruttink, T., Roldán-Ruiz, I., Ledauphin, T., Escobar-Gutiérrez, A., and Sampoux, J. P. (2019). Pleistocene climate changes, and not agricultural spread, accounts for range expansion and admixture in the dominant grassland species Lolium perenne L. J. Biogeogr 46, 1451–1465. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1111/jbi.13587 Boller, B., Posselt, U., and Veronesi, F. (2010). Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses. Handbook of Plant Breed- ing volume 501. (Germany: Springer, Dordrecht), 501p. Charmet, G. and Balfourier, F. (1995). The use of geostatistics for sampling a core collection of perennial ryegrass populations. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol 42, 303–309. Charmet, G., Balfourier, F., and Bion, A. (1990). Agro- nomic evaluation of a collection of French perennial ryegrass populations: multivariate classification using genotype x environment interactions. Agronomie 10, 807–823. Crochemore, M. L., Huyghe, C., Ecalle, C., and Julier, B. (1998). Structuration of alfalfa genetic diversity using agronomic and morphological characteristics. Relationships with RAPD markers. Agronomie 18(1), 79–94. Demarly, Y. (1957). Biologie et exploitation de la luzerne. Ann. Amelior. Plantes 3, 247–272. El-Ghazzal, Z., Louarn, G., Julier, B., and Barillot, R. (2024). Vers la conception d’un idéotype de https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-070523-044239 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-070523-044239 https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.898462 https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.898462 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.ASZO2413 https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.ASZO2413 https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13289 https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13289 https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13587 https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13587 Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 INRAE Prairies genebank for forage and turf 117 luzerne pour un usage de mulch vivant avec le blé. In Proceedings of Rencontres Francophones sur les Légumineuses. Saly - Dakar, Sénégal, volume 105. Fitzpatrick, M. C., Chhatre, V. E., Soolanayakanahally, R. Y., and Keller, S. R. (2021). Experimental support for genomic prediction of climate maladaptation using the machine learning approach Gradient Forests. Mol. Ecol. Resour 21, 2749–2765. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1111/1755-0998.13374 Ghesquière, M., Humphreys, M. W., and Zwierzykowski, Z. (2010). Festulolium. In Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses, Handbook of plant breeding, ed. Boller, B., Posselt, U. K., and Veronesi, F. (Springer Science+Business Media LLC), 288-311. Ghesquière, M. and Jadas-Hécart, J. (1995). Les fétuques ou le genre Festuca. In Ressources génétiques des plantes fourragères et à gazon, ed. Prospéri, J. M., Guy, P., and Balfourier, F., (Paris: BRG-INRA), 28-52. Gougherty, A. V., Keller, S. R., and Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2021). Maladaptation, migration and extirpation fuel climate change risk in a forest tree species. Nat. Clim. Change 11(2), 166–171. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41558-020-00968-6 Herrmann, D., Flajoulot, S., Barre, P., Huyghe, C., Ronfort, J., and Julier, B. (2018). Comparison of morphological traits and molecular markers to analyse diversity and structure of alfalfa (Medicago sativa l.) cultivars. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol 65, 527–540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0551-z Humphreys, M. W., Thomas, H. M., Morgan, W. G., Meredith, M. R., Harper, J. A., Thomas, H., Zwierzykowski, Z., and Ghesquière, M. (1995). Dis- criminating the ancestral progenitor of hexaploid Fes- tuca arundinacea using genomic in-situ hybridization. Hered 75(2), 171–174. Hung, T. H., So, T., Thammavong, B., Chamchumroon, V., Theilade, I., Phourin, C., Bouamanivong, S., Hartvig, I., Gaisberg, H., Jalonen, R., Boshier, D., and Mackay, J. (2023). Range-wide differential adaptation and genomic offset in critically endangered Asian rosewoods. PNAS 120(33), e2301603120. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301603120 Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 145–159 Huyghe, C., De Vliegher, A., Van Gils, B., and Peeters, A. (2014). Grasslands and herbivore production in Europe and effects of common policies (Versailles, France: Editions Quae), 287p. Jadas-Hécart, J. and Gillet, M. (1978). Note sur les caractères agronomiques des hybrides entre fétuques élevées européennes et méditerranéennes avant et après doublement. Effet de la selection avant et après doublement. Ann. Amélior. Plant 38(5), 501–511. Julier, B. (1996). Traditional seed maintenance and origins of the French lucerne landraces. Euphytica 92(3), 353–357. Julier, B., Porcheron, A., Ecalle, C., and Guy, P. (1995). Genetic variability for morphology, growth and forage yield among perennial diploid and tetraploid lucerne populations (Medicago sativa L). Agronomie 15(5), 295–304. Keep, T., Sampoux, J. P., Barre, P., Blanco-Pastor, J. L., Dehmer, K., Durand, J. L., Hegarty, M., Ledauphin, T., Muylle, H., Roldan-Ruiz, I., Ruttink, T., Surault, F., Willner, E., and Volaire, F. (2021). To grow or survive: which are the strategies of a perennial grass to face severe seasonal stress? Funct. Ecol 35, 1145–1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13770 Keep, T., Sampoux, J. P., Blanco-Pastor, J. L., Dehmer, K. J., Hegarty, M. J., Ledauphin, T., Litrico, I., Muylle, an-Ruiz, I., Roschanski, A. M., Ruttink, T., Surault, F., Willner, E., and Barre, P. (2020). High- throughput genome-wide genotyping to optimize the use of natural genetic resources in the grassland species perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). G3–GENES GENOM. GENET . doi: https://doi.org/10. 1534/g3.120.401491 Kimbeng, C. A. and Bingham, E. T. (1998). Population improvement in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.): compo- nents of inbreeding depression are different in original and improved populations. Aust. J. Exp. Agric 38(8), 831–836. Litrico, I. and Violle, C. (2015). Diversity in plant breeding: a new conceptual framework. Trends Plant Sci 20, 604–613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tplants.2015.07.007 Martin, G., Durand, J. L., Duru, M., Gastal, F., Julier, B., Litrico, I., Louarn, G., Mediene, S., Moreau, D., Valentin-Morison, M., Novak, S., Parnaudeau, V., Paschalidou, F., Vertès, F., Voisin, A. S., Cellier, P., and Jeuffroy, M. H. (2020). Role of ley pastures in tomorrow’s cropping systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev 40(17). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13593-020-00620-9 Mayer, R., Vincent, A., and Ecochard, R. (1951). Les populations françaises de luzerne: caractérisation - zones de culture - valeur culturale. Ann. Amelior. Plantes 2, 1–46. Michaud, R., Lehman, W. F., and Rumbaugh, M. D. (1988). World distribution and historical develop- ment. In Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement, ed. Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K., and Hill, R. R., (Madison, USA: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Publishers), 25-91. Mousset, C. (2000). Rassemblement, utilisation et gestion des ressources génétiques de dactyle à l’INRA de Lusignan. Fourrages 162, 121–139. Ortiz, S. and Rodriguez-Oubiña, J. (1993). Dactylis glomerata subsp. Izcoi, a new subspecies from Galicia NW Iberian peninsula. Ann. Bot. Fennici 30, 305–311. Pégard, M., Barre, P., Delaunay, S., Surault, F., Karagić, D., Milić, D., Zorić, M., Ruttink, T., and Julier, B. (2023a). Genome-wide genotyping data renew knowledge on genetic diversity of a worldwide alfalfa collection and give insights on genetic control of phenology traits. Front. Plant Sci 14, 1–18. doi: https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1196134 Pégard, M., Fitzpatrick, M. C., and Sampoux, J. P. (2023b). Assessment of vulnerability to climate https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13374 https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13374 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00968-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00968-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0551-z https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301603120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301603120 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13770 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401491 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401491 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00620-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00620-9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1196134 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1196134 118 Sampoux et al Genetic Resources (2025), (S2), 106–118 change in natural populations of perennial ryegrass across Europe from allele frequencies at adaptive loci. 35th EUCARPIA Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses section Conference, 10-14 Sept 2023, Brno, Czech Republic. doi: https://doi.org/10.5507/vup. 23.24463414 Prosperi, J. M., Enguita, I. D., and Angevain, M. (1989). Prospection du genre Medicago en Espagne et au Portugal. Plant Genet. Res. Newslett 78(79), 27–29. Prosperi, J. M., Jenczewski, E., Angevain, M., and Ronfort, J. (2006). Morphologic and agronomic diversity of wild genetic resources of Medicago sativa L. collected in Spain. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol 53, 843– 856. Prospéri, J. M. and Sampoux, J. P. (2005). Le réseau de conservation des ressources génétiques des plantes fourragères et à gazon: quelle diversité génétique au sein des collections d’espèces pérennes? Fourrages 182, 245–262. Sampoux, J. P. and Badeau, V. (2009). Empirical niche modelling of the spontaneous diversity of forage and turf species to improve collection and ex situ conservation. In Sustainable use of genetic diversity in forage and turf breeding, ed. Huyghe, C., (Dordrecht: Springer), 29-40. Sampoux, J. P., Baudouin, P., Bayle, B., Béguier, V., Bourdon, P., Chosson, J. F., De Bruijn, K., Deneufbourg, F., Galbrun, C., Ghesquière, M., Noël, D., Tharel, B., and Viguié, A. (2012). Breeding perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) for turf usage: an assessment of genetic improvements in cultivars released in Europe, 1974-2004. Grass Forage Sci 68, 33–48. Sampoux, J. P., Baudouin, P., Bayle, B., Béguier, V., Bourdon, P., Chosson, J. F., Deneufbourg, F., Galbrun, C., Ghesquière, M., Noël, D., Pietraszek, W., Tharel, B., and Viguié, A. (2011). Breeding perennial grasses for forage usage: an experimental assessment of trait changes in diploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars released in the last four decades. Field Crops Res 123, 117–129. Sampoux, J. P., Giraud, H., and Litrico, I. (2020). Which recurrent selection scheme to improve mixtures of crop species? Theoretical expectations. G3–GENES GENOM. GENET 10(1), 89–107. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1534/g3.119.400809 Sampoux, J. P. and Huyghe, C. (2009). Contribution of ploidy-level variation and adaptive trait diversity to the environmental distribution of taxa in the ‘fine- leaved fescue’ lineage (genus Festuca subg. Festuca). J. Biogeogr 36, 1978–1993. Sampoux, J. P. and Willner, E. (2022). ImprovLoli- umCol - Activity report. ECPGR Activity Grant Scheme - Phase IX Sixth Call. url: https: //www.ecpgr.org/resources/ecpgr-publications/ publication/improvloliumcol-activity-report-2022. Stace, C. (1980). Taxonomy of the Festuca rubra aggregate. Watsonia 13(77). Surault, F., Huyghe, C., Sampoux, J. P., Larbre, D., Barre, P., Louarn, G., and Julier, B. (2024). Weed control, protein and forage yield of seven grass species in lucerne-grass associations. Field Crops Res 309(1), 109308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr. 2024.109308 Welcker, C., Spencer, N., Turc, O., Granato, I., Chapuis, R., Madur, D., Beauchene, K., Gouesnard, B., Draye, X., Palaffre, C., Lorgeou, J., Melkior, S., Guillaume, C., Presterl, T., Murigneux, A., Wisser, R. J., Millet, E. J., Van Eeuwijk, F., Charcosset, A., and Tardieu, F. (2022). Physiological adaptive traits are a potential allele reservoir for maize genetic progress under challenging conditions. Nat. Commun 13(3225). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30872-w Wilkinson, M. and Stace, C. (1991). A new taxonomic treatment of the Festuca ovina L. aggregate (Poaceae) in the British Isles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc 106, 347–397. Zou, Y., Yang, W., Zhang, R., and Xu, X. (2024). Signa- tures of local adaptation and maladaptation to future climate in wild Zizania latifolia. Communications biol- ogy 7(1313). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003- 024-07036-1 https://doi.org/10.5507/vup.23.24463414 https://doi.org/10.5507/vup.23.24463414 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400809 https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400809 https://www.ecpgr.org/resources/ecpgr-publications/publication/improvloliumcol-activity-report-2022 https://www.ecpgr.org/resources/ecpgr-publications/publication/improvloliumcol-activity-report-2022 https://www.ecpgr.org/resources/ecpgr-publications/publication/improvloliumcol-activity-report-2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109308 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109308 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30872-w https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07036-1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07036-1 Introduction Genetic materials maintained by the Prairies genebank Collection of orchard grass Natural populations Other genetic materials Collection of tall fescue Natural populations Other genetic materials Collection of ryegrasses Natural populations Other genetic materials Collection of fine-leaved fescues Natural populations Other genetic materials Collection of lucerne History of the collection Genetic resources currently available Other genetic materials in collections Practical organization of the Prairies genebank Uniqueness of the collections Valorization of the collections Author contributions Conflict of interest statement