2021 | 74/1 | 21–40 | 2 Figs. | 6 Pls. | 1 Appendix | www.geologia-croatica.hr Journal of the Croatian Geological Survey and the Croatian Geological Society 1. INTRODUCTION Upper Cretaceous and Palaeogene deposits drilled in six deep ex- ploration wells in the Palmyrides, Syria comprise an approxi- mately 1300 metre thick succession of marine strata. These de- posits are predominantly composed of hemipelagic argillaceous limestones and marls (upper Cretaceous), deep water clayey lime- stones and marls (Palaeocene and Eocene), and sandstone, bio- clastic limestone and marls (Oligocene). Their moderately to well preserved planktonic foraminiferal assemblages enable biostrati- graphic determination. Calcitic planktonic foraminiferal tests pro- vide a valuable record of their natural habitats in ancient seas and oceans, and geochemical analyses allow determination of their ecological niche position within the water column (SCHACKLE- TON et al., 1985; PEARSON et al., 1993; PEARSON et al., 2001; EDGAR et al., 2010; BIRCH et al., 2012). Morphological charac- teristics of the tests (shape and size, wall texture, etc.) are usually developed as a response to the biotic and abiotic requirements of Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) and Palaeogene succession of the Palmyrides (Syria) Vlasta Premec Fućek1,*, Morana Hernitz Kučenjak2 and Gabrijela Pecimotika2 1 Krvarić 36/1, 10 090 Zagreb; (*corresponding author: vlasta.pfucek@gmail.com) 2 INA - Industrija nafte d.d., Lovinčićeva 4, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia doi: 10.4154/gc.2021.05 Abstract An upper Campanian to upper Oligocene stratigraphic succession has been examined from six deep exploration wells in the Palmyrides area of Syria. Most of the sedimentary succession con- tains rich and well to moderately preserved planktonic foraminiferal assemblages that enable successful age determination. The upper Campanian and Maastrichtian planktonic fauna is highly diverse with domination of warm water taxa such as Globotruncana aegyptiaca, Gansse­ rina gansseri, Globotruncanella havanensis, Globotruncanita angulata and Pseudotextularia ele­ gans. The most dramatic turnover occurred across the Cretaceous/Palaeocene boundary when most planktonic foraminiferal species became extinct. The oldest Palaeocene planktonic fora- miniferal assemblage, rich in the number of specimens, but not very diverse, includes the fol- lowing species: Eoglobigerina eobulloides, Globanomalina archeocompressa, Chiloguembelina morsei, Woodringina claytonensis and Parasubbotina pseudobulloides. The late Palaeocene is marked by origination of the morozovellids, acarininids and globanomalinids, while the early Eo- cene is characterized by a tropical assemblage, dominated by muricate species, and by inten- sive speciation of Acarinina and Subbotina in the latest part. Most of these species continue into the middle Eocene and become a significant component of the planktonic community. The middle Eocene is characterized by intensive speciation and domination of warm water genera such as Acarinina, Morozovelloides, and to a lesser degree Turborotalia, Globigerinatheka and Hantkenina. The middle/late Eocene boundary is marked by double extinction of the last muri- cate taxa Acarinina mcgowrani and Morozovelloides crasssatus, which indicate a variable cli- mate, water column instability, and loss of surface habitats. In contrast, Turborotalia and Globi­ gerinateheka become more important in the late Eocene. The Eocene/Oligocene boundary is marked by the extinction of most warm water taxa including Turborotalia cerroazulensis group, Hantkenina, Globigerinatheka and some subbotinids. The beginning of the early Oligocene is indicated by the domination of cool water taxa such as Dentoglobigerina, Globorotaloides, Tenu­ itella and Chiloguembelina. Speciation of the spinose surface dweller Ciperoella ciperoensis group reflects warming in the late Oligocene. The combined observations of lithology with the diversity and composition of planktonic foraminifera assemblages indicate that the Palmyrides area in Syria was a Tethyan bioprovince with a tropical to subtropical climate from the late Cam- panian to the end of the Eocene with deposition in deep sea environments (upper bathyal to outer shelf). In contrast, Oligocene deposits and their microfossil content suggest temperate to warm climate conditions and sedimentation in middle to inner shelf environments. their natural habitats. These characteristics allow differentiation of four main upper ocean (i.e., photic zone) habitats: surface/sub- surface, mixed-layers, thermocline and subthermocline. This study documents the composition, changes and frequency of the main planktonic foraminiferal groups during the geological time period spanning the late Campanian to the end of the Oligocene. Here, the lithological characteristics and depositional envi- ronments of the upper Cretaceous to Palaeogene strata were de- termined, together with their correlation within the investigated Palmyrides area of Syria. Previous biostratigraphic investigations of the Upper Cretaceous and Palaeogene deposits from deep ex- ploration wells in the Palmyride area were conducted by LUČIĆ (2001), STANKOVIĆ et al. (2003; 2005), DACER et al. (2007), HERNITZ KUČENJAK et al. (2005, 2006), HERNITZ KUČENJAK (2008) and PECIMOTIKA et al. (2014). Important biostratigraphic work on the Palaeogene deposits in Syria has been undertaken by KRASHENINNIKOV et al. (1996). Article history: Manuscript received May 07, 2020 Revised manuscript accepted February 03, 2021 Available online February 28, 2021 Keywords: biostratigraphy, lithology, upper Cretaceous, Palaeogene, planktonic foraminifera, Syria G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/122 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The biostratigraphic, lithological and palaeoecological results were obtained from drill cuttings collected from six exploration wells (numbered J-1 to J-6), and from two cored intervals in the J-3 well (842.5‒852 m and 1604‒1613 m). Samples were collected every 10 to 20 m and a total of 453 samples were processed and analysed. Sample preparation methods for micropalaeontological ana- lyses varied according to the degree of lithification. Loose rock samples were prepared by a standard washing procedure that in- cluded soaking in water with a small amount of 10‒15% hydro- gen peroxide (H2O2), and washing after 24 hours under running water through 63 μm, 125 μm, 160 μm, 250 μm, 315 μm, and 630 μm sieves. These fractions were dried, and foraminifera were picked onto micropalaeontological slides. Standard micropalae- ontological analyses were performed by a stereomicroscope. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for a detailed study of planktonic foraminiferal morphology (e.g., wall texture, ornamentation). Petrographic thin-sections were also made from lithified rock samples. Biostratigraphic interpretations were based on BERGGREN & PEARSON (2005), and WADE et al. (2011) for the Palaeogene, and on ROBASZYNSKI et al. (1984), CARON (1985), ROBASZYNSKI & CARON (1995), PREMOLI SILVA & SLITER (1995, 1999) and PREMOLI SILVA & VERGA (2004) for the upper Cretaceous. Determination of Palaeogene plank- tonic foraminiferal genera and species was based on SPEZZA- FERRI (1994), OLSSON et al. (1999), IACCARINO et al. (2005), PREMOLI SILVA & PETRIZZIO (2006), PEARSON et al. (2006) and WADE et al. (2018). The micropalaeontological in- vestigation of the Campanian and Maastrichtian planktonic fo- raminiferal genera and species was focused on the vertical dis- tribution, diversity and composition of mainly planktonic and less abundant benthic foraminiferal assemblages according to GA- WOR-BIEDOWA (1984), LOEBLICH & TAPPAN (1988), IS- MAIL (1992), BOLLI et al. (1994), LY & KUHNT (1994), KAIHO (1998), PREMOLI SILVA & VERGA (2004), ISMAIL et al. (2007), and GASIŃSKI & UCHMAN (2009), SARI (2006, 2009), PETRIZZO et al. (2011) and PÉREZ-RODRÍGUEZ et al. (2012). Genera and species of benthic foraminifera were also de- termined and counted for the calculation of plankton/benthos ra- tios (VAN DER ZWAAN et al., 1990; MURRAY, 1991). Petrographic and sedimentological analyses focused on thin- sections of rock samples taken every 10 to 20 m. The lithological column for each well is shown in Figure 2. Carbonate rocks were classified according to FLÜGEL (2010) and other rock types were classified using schemes published in PETTIJOHN (1975). Palae- oenvironmental interpretations were based upon the lithological and sedimentological analyses as well as the determined micro- fossil assemblages. 3. GEOLOGICAL SETTING Syria is located within the Arabian plate (Fig. 1), and almost com- pletely surrounded by active plate boundaries. Syria’s western boundary is marked by the Dead Sea fault system, which separates the Arabian plate from the Levantine subplate. To the north is the Bitlis edge that represents the collision boundary between the Ara- bian and Eurasian plates. The Zagros fault system is situated to the east and southeast and it marks the collision boundary between the Arabian plate and Iran (BREW, 2001; BREW et al., 2001). Tectonically, Syria can be divided into four major domains: 1) the Palmyride fold and thrust belt; 2) the Abd el Aziz – Sinjar uplift; 3) the Euphrates Graben or Depression; and 4) the Dead Sea Fault System (LITAK et al., 1998; BREW, 2001; BREW et al., 2001). The studied wells are located within the Hayan explo- ration block (Fig. 1), which is part of the Palmyride area in the Figure 1. Map of Syria showing the main tectonic zones (modified from BREW, 2001). Dark gray square indicates the location of the Hayan exploration block in NE Palmyrides, limited by the Jihar fault and Bilas Block to the North, by the Al Daww Depression to the SE, the SW Palmyrides to the south, and by the Homs Depression to the NW. The red point signifies the location of the J–1 to J–6 wells. G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 23 central part of Syria. The Palmyrides are the most extensive and topographically prominent tectonic zone in Syria. This area rep- resents a 400 km long and 100 km wide intracontinental fold and thrust belt, extending from the Dead Sea Fault Zone in the west to the Euphrates fault system in the east (LUČIĆ & FORŠEK, 2000; BREW, 2001). It is formed in between the two relatively undeformed tectonic blocks known as the Allepo Plateau to the north and the Ruthbah uplift to the south. Based on topography and structure, the Palmyrides are com- monly subdivided into the SW or Frontal Palmyrides and the NE or Central Palmyrides separated by the Jihar fault (BREW, 2001). The southwestern Palmyrides are represented by a fold and thrust belt, whereas the northeastern Palmyrides include the Bilas and Bishri blocks. The low-relief Al Daww Depression, which is a 100 km long and 20 km wide inter-montaine basin, lies between the Jihar fault and the short-wavelength folds of the southern Pal- myrides (LUČIĆ & FORŠEK, 2000; BREW, 2001; LUČIĆ et al., 2002; TOMLJENOVIĆ et al., 2008). The Hayan block is situated partly in the Al Daww depression and extends towards the Bilas block. Geophysical anomalies, identified both beneath and around the Palmyrides, indicate that during the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and part of the Cenozoic this area was a tectonically unstable depo- centre with 11 km thick deposits (MOUTY & AL-MALEH, 1983; CHAIMOV et al., 1992; BREW et al., 2001; KRIŽ et al., 2005; TOMLJENOVIĆ et al., 2008). 4. LITHOLOGY This investigation follows the lithostratigraphic distribution pro- posed by BREW (2001). The examined succession spans the Campanian to Oligocene time interval and is represented by four lithostratigraphic units – the Shiranish Formation (upper Cam- panian‒Maastrichtian), Kermav Formation (Palaeocene), Jaddala Formation (Eocene) and Chilou Formation (Oligocene). 4.1. Shiranish Formation (Upper Campanian–Maastrictian) The Shiranish Formation (Fig. 2) is characterized by argillaceous limestones, marls, chert and sporadic disc shaped or ovoid cal- careous concretions (approx. 10‒30 cm in diameter). Argillaceous limestone (mudstone/wackestone) and marls are composed of a clayey–microcrystalline calcitic matrix with abundant pelagic fauna. The abundance of planktonic foraminifera and the large amount of clayey detritus (sourced from the hinterland) evidently indicate an open-sea influence. Accordingly, these sediments were deposited in upper bathyal to outer shelf environments. 4.2. Kermav Formation (Palaeocene) The Palaeocene deposits (Fig. 2) are composed of clayey lime- stones and marls with pelagic fauna. Clayey limestones and marls are generally grey in colour and may occasionally be yellowish or greenish, or locally dark grey. They are composed of micrite with variable amounts of clay and planktonic foraminifera. The lower- most Palaeocene deposits consist of fossiliferous marl with phos- phate grains, yellow or light brown in colour, present in the cored interval of the J-3 well (core-2, 1604‒1613 m). The only lithologi- cal differences relative to the underlying Cretaceous deposits (Shi- ranish Formation) are the greater amount of clayey components and the different microfossil assemblage. The lithological charac- Figure 2. A schematic stratigraphic profile of the J-1 to J-6 wells. Cored intervals belong to J-3 well, core-1 (842.5–852.0 m), middle Eocene; core-2 (1604–1613 m), upper Palaeocene. Samples of the rock material from drill cuttings were taken every 10 to 20 metres. The Lowest (LO) and the Highest occurrences (HO) of the se- lected planktonic foraminiferal species are marked. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/124 teristics of these deposits, as well as their microfossil association dominated by planktonic species (over 95%) indicate deposition in deep sea environments (outer shelf to upper bathyal). 4.3. Jaddala Formation (Eocene) The upper Eocene deposits (Fig. 2) are composed of two differ- ent facies. The lower facies is represented by chalky marl, which is in places very rich in glauconite, while the upper part is gene- rally calcareous. The amount of glauconite locally increases high enough to form a horizon of glauconitic sands and glauconitic marl. The lower and middle Eocene deposits are generally repre- sented by limestones, calcitic marls and clayey limestones with a chalky appearance. Chert is present in the lower part of these deposits as lenses, nodules and tabular beds. Clayey limestones/ chalky limestones are light grey to brownish-white mudstone/ wackestone types with a variable amount of clayey components. Planktonic and rare small benthic foraminifera are irregularly distributed within their micritic matrix. These limestones locally contain fine dispersed rounded to subrounded glauconite grains. Marls are grey to brownish grey in colour and in places slightly silty with planktonic foraminifera. Cherts are composed of very fine granular quartz with patches of chalcedony, which mostly have circular sections and resulted from infilling of the chambers of planktonic foraminifera or sponge spicules. In places, the sili- ceous matrix contains thin inclusions of micrite and microsparite in the shape of isolated crystals or fine aggregation of crystals with irregular edges marking the silicification front. Glauconite grains are well-sorted with rounded to sub-rounded edges, mostly fine to medium sand-sized particles, and some have microscopic fissures. Most of the glauconite grains have a homogenous and finely crystalline texture. Surrounding the glauconite grains is a mainly micritic or clayey micritic matrix with some ferruginous oxide spots. Lithological characteristics of these deposits, as well as their microfossil association with the domination of planktonic species indicate deposition in deeper sea environments (outer shelf to deep marine). 4.4. Chilou Formation (Oligocene) The Oligocene deposits (Fig. 2) are represented by sandstone and conglomeratic sandstone with intercalations of sandy limestones or bioclastic limestones, which are yellow in colour, rich in large foraminifera, and alternating with marl and/or bioturbated lime- stone. Sandstones are grey to brownish red, fine- medium grained quartz arenite with subangular quartz grains in haematite and ferrous dolomite and, sporadically, calcite cement. Conglome- ratic sandstones are composed of subrounded quartz grains in dolomite (mostly ferrous) cement. Limestones are light grey to yellowish in colour, mainly represented by homogenous or hori- zontally bioturbated mudstone/wackestone and rare sandy packe- stone, sporadically with fossil grains of mainly benthonic fo- raminifera and rare planktonic foraminifera or echinoids. In places, bioturbated limestones contain mud-balls, reaching 20‒30 cm in diameter. Planktonic foraminifera are commonly pyritized. All types of limestones commonly contain nodules of different forms of chert as well as some detrital quartz arenite grains. Marls are yellowish, light grey to dark grey in colour, partly silty or sandy, and commonly contain pyrite. Moderately diverse mi- crofossil associations of both planktonic and benthic foraminife- ral species suggest temperate climate conditions. Plankton/ben- thos ratio and lithofacies characteristics indicate sedimentation in middle to inner shelf environments. 5. BIOSTRATIGRAPHY This micropalaeontological study covers a time period of over 50 million years (BERGGREN et al., 1995; COHEN et al., 2013; WADE et al., 2011) with a sedimentary succession over 1300 m thick s (Fig. 2). Planktonic foraminiferal assemblages had changed during that time in the number of species, number of in- dividuals, and test preservation. The micropalaeontological in- vestigation of upper Cretaceous and Palaeogene microfauna was focused on the vertical distribution, diversity, and composition of mainly planktonic and less abundant benthic foraminiferal as- semblages. Genera and species of benthic foraminifera were also determined and counted for the calculation of plankton/benthos ratios after VAN DER ZWAAN et al., 1990; MURRAY, 1991. The boundary between Palaeogene stratigraphic units was based on BERGGREN & PEARSON (2005) and WADE et al. (2011). 5.1. Late Campanian–Maastrichtian Identification of late Cretaceous specimens is based on micro- scopic observations of thin-sections. Studied material contains well preserved and diverse associations of foraminifera, espe- cially in the J-5 and J-6 wells (Fig. 2). These include highly di- verse globotruncanids, rugoglobigerinids, globigerinelloids and heterohelicid planktonic foraminifera with rare small calcareous benthic foraminifera, and some inoceramids and echinoids. This assemblage is composed of the following representa- tives: Contusotruncana contusa, Racemiguembelina fructicosa, Pseudotextularia elegans, Globotruncanita conica, Gansserina gansseri (Pl. 1, Fig. 1), Plummerita hantkeninoides, Globotrun­ canella pschadae, Globotruncanita angulata, Globotruncanita conica (Pl. 1, Fig. 2), Rugoglobigerina macrocephala, Globotrun­ cana aegyptiaca (Pl. 1, Fig. 3), Globotruncana arca (Pl. 1, Fig. 4), Globotruncana ventricosa (Pl. 1, Fig. 5), Globotruncanella havanensis (Pl. 1, Fig. 6), Globotruncanita stuarti and Goglobige­ rinelloides alvarezi. According to HARDENBOL et al. (1998), the age of this unit is late Campanian to Maastrichtian. This assemblage also contains the following species with a wider stratigraphic range: Muricohedbergella monmouthensis, Glo­ botruncana insignis, Globotruncana rosetta, Rugoglobigerina rugosa (Pl. 1, Fig. 7), Globotruncana bulloides (Pl. 1, Fig. 8), Macroglobigerinelloides prairiehillensis (Pl.1, Fig 9), Macroglobige­ rinelloides bolli (Pl. 1, Fig. 10), Muricohedbergella holmdelensis (Pl. 1, Fig. 11), Muricohedbergella monmouthensis (Pl. 1, Fig. 12), Heterohelix globulosa (Pl. 1, Fig. 13), Heterohelix striata, Archaeo­ globigerina blowi (Pl. 1, Fig. 14), Contusotruncana fornicata, Glo­ bigerinelloides bollii and Pseudotextularia elegans (Pl. 1, Fig. 15) and Planoglobulina sp. The assemblage of small benthic foramini- fera includes Oridorsalis umbonatus, Cibicidoides sp., Bolivinoides sp., Pullenia sp., Tritaxia sp. and Gavelinella sp. Such a planktonic foraminiferal assemblage with diverse keeled taxa is characteristic for the Tethyan warm water biopro- vince. The high percentage (90‒95%) of planktonic taxa within the microfaunal assemblage suggests an upper to middle bathyal depth for this interval (BOERSMA, 1988; MURRAY, 1991; GRÄFE, 2005). The high diversity of planktonic foraminifera abruptly decreases in the uppermost part of this unit in all six wells. 5.2. Early Palaeocene The Cretaceous/Palaeocene boundary is marked by the extinc- tion of most of the Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera (OLSSON et al., 1999; WADE et al., 2011). The lower Palaeocene deposits, G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 25 composed of clayey limestones and dark gray marls, contain rare, recrystallized specimens of planktonic foraminifera. Therefore, in all the investigated wells the lowermost Palaeocene is an al- most sterile interval. There are only two exceptions with well preserved microfauna. Samples collected in 1700‒1710 m inter- val in the J-2 well contains the oldest Palaeocene planktonic fo- raminiferal association, rich in the number of specimens, but not very diverse. An almost identical planktonic community is de- termined from the cored interval (1604‒1613 m) in the J-3 well, where fossiliferous marls contain abundant planktonic foramini- fera characteristic most probably of the lowermost Palaeocene Zones P0‒Pα after OLSSON et al. (1999) and WADE et al. (2011). This association contains the following taxa: Eoglobigerina eo­ bulloides (Pl. 2, Fig. 1), E. edita, Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (Pl. 2, Fig. 2), Woodringerina claytonensis (Pl. 2, Fig. 3), Chi­ loguembelina morsei, Globanomalina archeocompressa and Subbotina trivialis. In addition, sample 1540‒1545 m in J-3 well contain also Subbotina triloculinoides (Pl. 2, Figs. 4 and 5) and Chiloguembelina morsei (Pl. 2, Fig. 6). In the middle and upper part of the lower Palaeocene inter- val, a more diverse planktonic foraminiferal assemblage has been determined: Globanomalina compressa, Praemurica pseudoin­ constans, Praemurica inconstans, Subbotina triloculinoides and S. triangularis. Some of the recognized species, such as Globanomalina imitata, G. ehrenbergi, Morozovella praeangu­ lata, Parasubbotina pseudobulloides and Chiloguembelina mid­ wayensis first appeared in the early Palaeocene and continue into the late Palaeocene. The species Morozovella praeangulata (Pl. 2, Fig. 7) is the first representative of an important Palaeo- cene genus that had its lowest occurrence (LO) in the uppermost part of this interval. Biserial genus Chiloguembelina is present in the entire interval and the genera Praemurica and Globanoma­ lina are common in the upper part of this interval. Based on the planktonic foraminiferal assemblage, this interval approximately corresponds to the early Palaeocene Zones P1 to P2 after WADE et all. (2011). Although planktonic foraminifera dominate in the assemblage (90%), some smaller benthic genera are also present: Neoeponides, Pullenia, Tritaxia, Dorothia and Stilostomella. 5.3. Late Palaeocene The upper Palaeocene deposits, present in all investigated wells, contain rich, highly diverse and moderately to very well pre- served planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. The boundary be- tween the lower and upper Palaeocene is defined by the lowest occurrence (LO) of Igorina pusilla and Morozovella angulata (OLSSON et al., 1999). Species which continue from the early Palaeocene and became extinct in the late Palaeocene include Subbotina triangularis, Subbotina triloculinoides, Morozovella praeangulata, Parasubbotina pseudobulloides and Praemurica inconstans. The main characteristic of the upper Palaeocene planktonic assemblage is the domination of warm water species with complex test morphology (ornamented taxa), including Mo­ rozovella acuta, M. velascoensis, M. angulata (Pl. 2, Fig. 8 and 9), M. praeangulata, Acarinina mckannai, Igorina pusilla (Pl. 2, Fig. 10), I. tadjikistanensis and I. albeari. However, species with a thin and smooth wall texture such as Globanomalina chapmani and Globanomalina pseudomenardii are present with a few spec- imens each. Subbotina cancellata (Pl. 2, Fig. 11), Subbotina cf. triangularis (Pl. 2, Fig. 12) and S. triloculinoides are common. Furthermore, species that have their first appearance in this in- terval and cross the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary include Mo­ rozovella aequa, M. subbotinae, Subbotina velascoensis, Acarin­ ina coalingensis (Pl. 2, Fig. 13), A. soldadoensis (Pl. 2, Fig. 14) and Acarinina sp. (Pl. 2, Fig. 15). Microperforate biserial species are represented by Chiloguembelina midwayensis, C. wilcoxen­ sis, C. crinita and Zeauvigerina waiparaensis. The rich and highly diversified assemblage indicates the biostratigraphic in- terval from Zone P3 to Zone P5 after WADE et al. (2011). Benthic foraminifera appear with a small number of indi- viduals per sample. The plankton/benthos ratio is approximately 90:10, indicating deep and open marine depositional environ- ments. 5.4. Early Eocene The Palaeocene/Eocene boundary is marked by the Lowest oc- currence (LO) of Acarinina sibaiyaensis (BERGGREN and PEARSON, 2005; WADE et al., 2011). The material studied contains rich and well preserved plank- tonic foraminiferal assemblages. Pseudohastigerina wilcoxensis has its first appearance in the lowermost part of the Lower Eo- cene and indicates the beginning of Zone E1. The lower part of the interval which most probably corresponds to Zones E1 to E3, is dominated by tropical warm water taxa such as Acarinina, Mo­ rozovella and Igorina. Many of the species recognized in this in- terval, which appeared in the late Palaeocene, continued into the early Eocene such as Morozovella subbotinae (Pl. 3, Fig. 1), Mo­ rozovellaa aequa (Pl. 3, Fig. 2), Morozovella acuta, Acarinina coalingensis, Acarinina soldadoensis, Subbotina velascoensis, Globanomalina planoconica (Pl. 3, Fig. 4) and Chiloguembelina wilcoxensis. Species that first occurred in the middle part of the early Eo- cene (approximately correspond to the E4 to E6 Zones, Wade et al., 2011), and continued into the middle Eocene are; Morozovella aragonensis, Morozovella crater, Acarinina primitiva, Acarinina pentacamerata (Pl. 3, Fig. 3), Igorina broedermani (Pl. 3, Fig. 5), and Acarinina cuneicamerata (Pl. 3, Fig. 6). In addition, Morozo­ vella formosa, Acarinina pseudotopilensis and Acarinina quetra are present with a few specimens. The uppermost part of the lower Eocene interval which ap- proximately corresponds to Zone E7 (WADE et al., 2011), is chara- cterized by the first occurrence (FO) of several new species and genera and some of them will become important constituents of the middle Eocene fauna. Also significant is the speciation of the genus Acarinina, which is represented by the following species: Acarinina bullbrooki (Pl. 3, Fig. 7), A. mcgowrani, and A. praetopilensis. The first appearance of Turborotalia frontosa, (Pl. 3, Fig. 8), Parasubbotina griffinae, Subbotina yeguaensis, S. eocaena (Pl. 3, Figs. 9 and 10), S. linaperta (Pl. 3, Fig. 11), and Subotina sp. (Pl. 3, Fig. 12) have been observed in this interval and all these species continue into the middle Eocene. Small benthic foraminifera comprise only 10% of the total assemblage. 5.5. Middle Eocene The base of the middle Eocene is defined by the lowest occur- rence (LO) of Guembelitriodes nuttally (BERGGREN & PEAR- SON, 2005; WADE et al., 2011). In addition, the lowermost part of the middle Eocene is characterized by the common occurrence of Acarinina bullbrooki. The planktonic foraminiferal assemblage of the interval, which roughly corresponds to the Zone E8 after WADE et al. (2011), is dominated by acarininids, represented by Acarinina pentacamerata, A. cuneicamerata, A. praetopilensis and A. primi­ tiva. Acarininids together with other muricate taxa (Morozovella, G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/126 Igorina and rare Morozovelloides) comprise up to 45‒50% of the total foraminiferal assemblage. Subbotinids are also common (20%) and include the following species: Subbotina eocaena, S. yeguaensis, S. linaperta, S. crociapertura and S. senni. Turbo- rotalids are represented only by Turborotalia frontosa. Other species present include: Parasubbotina griffinae, Praemurica lozanoi, Globanomalina australiformis and Catapsydrax unica­ vus. Specimens of the genera Hantkenina (H. dumblei, Pl. 4, Fig. 1) and Globigerinatheka represented with the species G. curry (Pl. 4, Fig. 2) and G. subconglobata (Pl. 4, Fig. 3) are rare in this interval. The first representatives of the new Eocene genus Mo­ rozovelloides occur with only a few specimens of M. bandy (Pl. 6, Fig. 4) per sample. Pseudohastigerina micra and P. wilcoxen­ sis are the dominant species in the small size fraction (<125 μm) and make up to 40% of the small taxa. Beside them Planorotalites pseudoscitula, Acarinina collactea and the biserial form Chiloguembelina crinita are also present. Deposits from the middle part of the middle Eocene (approxi- mately correspond to Zones E10, E11 and E12) contain very rich and highly diverse planktonic foraminiferal assemblages, typi cal of low latitude areas. Acarininids remain a dominant com- ponent and are represented by Acarinina mcgowrani (Pl. 4, Fig. 5), A. praetopilensis, A. rohri, and A. topilensis (Pl. 4, Fig. 6). After the extinction of the two last representatives of Morozovella (M. aragonensis and M. crater), the new middle Eocene genus Morozovelloides expanded in this interval. Two new species Mo­ rozovelloides crassatus (Pl. 4, Fig. 7) and M. coronatus become an important component of the planktonic community and together with acarininids made up to 45% of the total microfauna, whereas species Morozovelloides lehneri (Pl. 4, Fig. 8) occurs rarely. Sub- botinids are still present with 20% of the total assemblage with the most common species S. eocaena (Pl. 4, Fig. 9) and S. lina­ perta (Pl. 4, Fig. 10). This tropical/subtropical fauna is also charac- terized by relatively rare (1‒2%) globigerinathekids as well as tur- borotalids (2‒3%) represented by Turborotalia frontosa, T. possagnoensis, T. pomeroli (Pl. 4, Fig. 11) and T. cerroazulensis (Pl. 4, Fig. 12). Besides Planorotalites and Pseudohastigerina, the small size fraction is enriched by common microperforate biserial taxa Chiloguembelina ototara, Chiloguembelina sp. and Strep­ tochilus martini. The triserial species Jenkinsina columbiana is present with a few specimens per sample. In the upper part of the middle Eocene, which approximately corresponds to Zones E13, muricate species significantly de- crease in abundance. Acarinina mcgowrani, Morozovelloides crasatus and small acarininids made up to 20% of the total as- semblage. They become replaced by an increasing number of turborotalids, subbotinids and globigerinatekids. In the latest mid- dle Eocene, species with cooler water preference such as Subbo­ tina, Dentoglobigerina, Catapsydrax and Turborotalita become an important component in the microfossil assemblage. The latest middle Eocene is marked by the rare occurrence of the last large muricate representatives Acarinina mcgowrani and Morozovel­ loides crasatus and by their extinction at the middle/late Eocene boundary. The percentage of planktonic foraminifera in the middle Eocene deposits varies between 90 and 95%. 5.6. Late Eocene The middle/upper Eocene boundary is marked by the double ex- tinction of the last large muricate representatives Acarinina mcgowrani and Morozovelloides crassatus (WADE, 2004; WADE et al., 2012). Small acarinids represented by A meddizai, A. colactea and A. echinata continue into the late Eocene. Based on the planktonic foraminiferal association standard biozonation from Zones E14 to E16 after WADE et al., (2011) have been reco- gnized in the late Eocene interval (HERNITZ KUCENJAK et al., 2006). Planktonic foraminifera show significant changes in comparison with the middle Eocene assemblage. Turborotalids, which intensively diverse during the middle Eocene, become a more important component of the upper Eocene planktonic community and they are represented by Turborotalia pomeroli, T. cerroazulensis (Pl. 5, Fig. 1), T cocoaensis (Pl. 5, Figs. 2 and 3) and T. increbescens. Species Turborotalia ampliapertura (Pl. 5, Fig. 4) occurred in the upper part of this interval which corre- sponds to Zone E15. The last species of this lineage Turborotalia cunialensis (Pl. 5, Fig. 5) appeared in the latest Eocene with very few specimens and indicates Zone E16 (WADE et al., 2011). Glo- bigerinathekids was a successful group in the lower part of the late Eocene Zone E14 and comprised up to 5% of the total fauna. They are represented by Globigerinatheka barry (Pl. 5, Fig. 6), G. kugleri, G. luterbacheri and G. index. They reduced in both diversity and number and only a few specimens of G. index are present in the middle part of this interval (Zone E15). Hantkeni- nids are represented by rare occurrences of Hantkenina alaba­ mensis (Pl. 5, Fig. 7), H. nanggulanensis and Cribrohantkenina inflata. Subbotinids are still present with 20‒25% of the assem- blage and include Subbotina linaperta (Pl. 5, Fig. 8), S. utilisin­ dex, S. corpulenta, S. eocaena and S. yeguaensis (Pl. 5, Fig. 9). During the late Eocene, dentoglobigerinids become more fre- quent, represented by the species Dentoglobigerina galavisi (Pl. 5, Fig. 10), and D. tripartita, whereas D. pseudovenezuelana oc- cur sporadically. Small sized species Globoturborotalita martini and G. ouachitaensis (Pl. 5, Fig. 11) are also present at 3‒4% of the planktonic assemblage. The microperforate biserial forms are represented by Streptochilus martini and Chiloguembelina oto­ tara, which persisted from the middle Eocene, while Chiloguem­ belina cubensis first appeared before the Eocene/Oligocene boundary (Zone E16). During the late Eocene small acarinids become very rare and are observed only in the small size fraction (<125 μm). Pseudohastigerinids are represented by P. micra (Pl. 5, Fig. 12) and P. naguawichensis (125‒160 μm fraction). Benthic foraminifera increase in abundance during the late Eocene and vary between 35 and 40%, indicating shallowing of the depositional realm. 5.7. Early Oligocene The Eocene/Oligocene (E/O) boundary is marked by the extinc- tion of all hantkeninids and the last representative of the genus Globigerinatheka - G. tropicalis. Planktonic foraminiferal Zones from O1 to O4 have been recognized (BERGGREN & PEAR- SON, 2005; WADE et al., 2011, 2018; HERNITZ KUCENJAK et al., 2006). The Eocene/Oligocene boundary represents a signifi- cant faunal overturn. Most of the specialized warm water taxa such as the Turborotalia cerroazulensis group, globigerinathek- ids and hantkeninids, which were important constituents of the middle and late Eocene planktonic foraminiferal community were replaced by cool water taxa such as Dentoglobigerina, Cata­ psydrax, Globorotaloides, Tenuitella and Chiloguembelina (KELLER, 1983; BOERSMA & PREMOLI SILVA, 1991; HERNITZ KUCENJAK et al., 2006). At the end of the late Eo- cene, just before the E/O boundary, Chiloguembelina cubensis (Pl. 6, Fig. 11) appeared, whereas Cassigerinella chipolensis (Pl. 6, Fig. 1) occurred immediately after the E/O boundary in Zone O1. The earliest Oligocene planktonic foraminiferal assemblage in Zones O1 and O2 comprises warm to temperate-water taxa in- G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 27 cluding Dentoglobigerina tripartita (Pl. 6, Fig. 2), D. pseudovene­ zuelana, D. tapuriensis (Pl. 6, Fig. 3), Subbotina gortanii, S. corpulenta, S. utilisindex, S. angiporoides, Turborotalia amplia­ pertura (Pl. 6, Fig. 4) and T. increbescens. Small sized species such as Pseudohastigeina naguewichiensis (Pl. 6, Fig. 5), Tenu­ itella gemma, Tenuitella sp., Globigerina officinalis (Pl. 6, Fig. 6) are also common. Small sized biserial taxa such as Chiloguem­ belina ototara (Pl. 6, Fig. 7), C. andreae, and Streptochilus mar­ tini are present only in the lower part of the early Oligocene (Zones O1 and O2), whereas Chiloguembelina cubensis (Pl. 6, Fig 8) and C. adriatica (Pl. 6, Fig. 9) occurred in the whole inter- val up to Zone O4. In the upper part of the early Oligocene which corresponds to Zones O3 and O4, the planktonic foraminiferal association is somewhat different – the number of large globigerinids (Dento­ globigerina, Subbotina) is reduced, but the share of smaller, spinose forms such as specimens of Ciperoella group, Ciperoella anguliofficinalis (pl. 6, Fig. 10); C. angulisuturalis (Pl. 6, Fig. 11), and C. ciperoensis (Pl. 6, Fig. 12) gradually increased. The number of benthic foraminiferal taxa gradually in- creased towards the end of early Oligocene, and the plankton/ benthos ratio is 50:50. 5.8. Late Oligocene The boundary between the early and late Oligocene is marked by the highest common occurrence (HCO) of Chiloguembelina cubensis (BERGGREN et al., 1995; WADE et al., 2011; 2018), with the proportion of this species in the community of plank- tonic foraminifera from the smallest sieved fraction (125‒63 mm) exceeding 5% (HERNITZ KUCENJAK et al., 2014; PREMEC FUĆEK et al., 2018). The lower part of the late Oligocene which corresponds to Zones O5 and O6 is characterized by large num- bers of specimens of the genera Ciperoella (C. angulisuturalis, C. ciperoensis, C. anguliofficinalis), and Globoturborotalita (G. ouachitaensis, G. occlusa). The top of Zone O5 is marked by the last occurrence of Paragloborotalia opima. During Zones O6 and O7 small size taxa are observed, including: Cassigerinella chi­ polensis, Tenuitella angustiumbilicata, Streptohilus pristinum, and rare specimens of Chiloguembelina cubensis and Jenkinsina columbiana. In the uppermost part of the late Oligocene (Zone O7) the first appearance of the Trilobatus primordius has been observed. The boundary between the Oligocene and the Miocene is defined by the first occurrence of Globorotalia kugleri (BERG- GREN et al., 1995; BERGGREN & PEARSON, 2005, WADE et al., 2011; 2018). This planktonic foraminiferal species has not been observed in samples from the exploration wells examined here. However, in the latest Oligocene, close to the Miocene boundary, a large number of Cassigerinela chipolensis specimens occurred in the planktonic foraminiferal association. This occur- rence as well as the composition of the entire planktonic fo- raminiferal association was used to place the Oligocene/Miocene boundary. The upper Oligocene benthic foraminiferal assem- blage significantly increases both in diversity and in the number of specimens with plankton/benthos ratio of 30:70%. 6. DISCUSSION The studied succession encompasses a long geological period from the upper Campanian to the end of the Palaeogene, which is characterized by global changes in ocean circulation and gene- ral cooling climatic trends (HAQ et al., 1987; HARDENBOL et al., 1998; ZACHOS, 2001; MACKENSEN, 2004; MILLER et al., 1987, 2008;). The late Cretaceous was characterized by low lati- tudinal thermal gradients (HUBER et al., 1995), and the forma- tion of deep warm, saline bottom waters (thermospheric circula- tion; HAQ, 1981; ALMOGI-LABIN et al. 1993; WIDMARK & SPEIJER, 1997). In contrast, the Palaeogene was characterized by general climatic cooling, which led to more pronounced lati- tudinal thermal gradients and changes in ocean circulation (ther- mohaline circulation; HAQ, 1981). Climatic changes in conjunc- tion with global sea level f luctuation significantly affected planktonic foraminiferal populations in the late Cretaceous and Palaeogene in all word oceans (HAQ, 1981; HAQ et al., 1987; MILLER et al., 2008; KATZ et al., 2008). Most of the deposits examined here contain rich and well-preserved foraminiferal as- semblages, which help in palaeoceanographic and palaeoclimatic interpretations of the investigated area. 6.1. Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal assemblages Late Cretaceous sediments contain rich and highly diverse foraminiferal assemblages which imply a well-stratified water column and warm surface water. The presence of ornamented and double-keeled globotruncanids which belong to highly spe- cialized (K-strategist) genera indicate a long and relative stable period with a tropical to subtropical climate. Globotruncanids are usually regarded as intermediate to deep ocean dwellers and were geographically limited to the Tethyan tropical-subtropical belt dur- ing the Late Cretaceous (ABRAMOVICH et al., 2002, 2003; PETRIZZO, 2002). Planktonic foraminiferal species from the upper Campanian to Maastrichtian interval inhabited a different niche in the stratified water column (ABRAMOVICH et al., 2003; HUBER et al., 1995; PETRIZZO, 2002). Deep-water habitats (subthermocline) were oc- cupied by relatively few species Globotruncanella havanensis, Gan­ sserina gansseri and Planoglobulina sp. The most stressful niche was the surface layer inhabited only by Pseudoguembelina species (ABRAMOVIC et al., 2003). Most species such as Globotruncana, Contusotruncana, Rugoglobigerina, Pseudotextularia and Hetero­ helix occupied subsurface depths of the mixed layer. The assem- blages could also vary between the thermocline layer and the sub- surface mixed layer during cool and warm intervals. During cool climate intervals, keeled globotruncanids and perhaps Globigerinel­ loides and Racemiguembelina occupied the thermocline layer, whereas Rugoglobigerina, Pseudotextularia and heterohelicids in- hibited the subsurface mixed layer (ABRAMOVICH et al., 2003). Sedimentation during the Late Campanian and Maastrichtian took place in pelagic environments (outer shelf to upper bathyal), as indicated by the high percentage of planktonic foraminifera (90‒95%) and the presence of complex morphotypes (K-strate- gists) dominant in open oceans (ROBASZYNSKI and CARON, 1995; ABRAMOVICH et al., 2002, 2003). The high diversity of planktonic foraminifera abruptly decreases in the uppermost part of this unit indicating changes and possible cooling in the latest Cretaceous ocean. 6.2. Palaeogene planktonic foraminiferal assemblages At the Cretaceous/Palaeocene (K/Pg) boundary, due to the cata- strophic Chicxulub impact event, the planktonic foraminiferal assemblage was reduced to a minimum, with only a few species surviving across the boundary (OLSSON et al., 1999; ARENIL- LAS et al., 2006; MACLEOD et al., 2007; KOUTSOUKOS, 2014). However, a number of new genera and species originated in the earliest Palaeocene during a relative short period of about 60 kya (ARENILLAS et al., 2006; WADE et al, 2011; BIRCH et G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/128 al., 2012). Although the Cretaceous/Palaeogene boundary is not documented in the studied intervals, the oldest Palaeocene plank- tonic foraminiferal assemblage is documented in the J-2 well (sample 1700‒1710 m) and in the cored interval (1604‒1613 m) from the J-3 well. This early Palaeocene planktonic community is rich in the number of specimens but is not very diverse. It in- cludes Eoglobigerina eobulloides (Pl. 2, Fig. 1), E. edita, Globanomalina archeocompressa, Chiloguembelina morsei (Pl. 2, Fig. 6), Woodringina claytonensis (Pl. 2, Fig.3), Subbotina trivialis and Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (Pl. 2, Fig. 2), which likely belong to the earliest Palaeocene Zones P0‒Pα. Small spe- cies are represented by Eoglobigerina eobulloides, which domi- nates the assemblage and is together with Parasubbotina pseu­ dobulloides, the first Palaeogene representative with a cancelate spinose wall texture (HEMLEBEN et al., 1991; OLSSON et al., 1999). These innovations enabled these small foraminifera to oc- cupy the surface niche in the water column like recent planktonic species (HEMLEBEN et al., 1989). Isotopic data by BIRCH et al. (2012) suggest that these small early Palaeocene species had a rapid evolution after the Cretaceous/Palaeogene (K/Pg) mass ex- tinction and inhabited a different niche in the thermally stratified water column. BIRCH et al. (2012) also identified a metabolic disequilibrium in carbon isotopes, which indicated the possible photosymbiotic relationship between foraminifera and algal sym- bionts. These data indicated that a photosymbiotic relationship may have been important in the early Palaeocene after the mass extinction. Although most of the surviving foraminiferal species belong to an opportunistic (r-strategist) group of organisms, the empty niche in the tropical to subtropical oligotrophic oceans provided them with an opportunity to evolve a new, more spe- cialistic mode of life such as morphological adaptation to inhabit the surface and subsurface niche in the water column due to the metabolic requirements of the symbiotic algae (BÉ, 1982; HEM- LEBEN et al., 1991). Consequently, the test morphology of the early Palaeocene species, including the spinose wall texture of Eoglobigerina and Subbotina or smooth surface of Globanoma­ lina, are closely related to their preferred niche in the water col- umn (BIRCH et al, 2012). The late Palaeocene is characterized by intensive speciation of the muricate genera Morozovella and Acarinina, which domi- nate the assemblage. Together with the genus Igorina they form up to 50% of the assemblage. These species with ornamented tests live in the surface/subsurface layer of the photic zone be- cause of the metabolic requirements of their symbionts (SCHACKLETON et al., 1985; D’HONDT et al, 1994, NORRIS, 1996; QUILLÉVÉRÉ & NORRIS, 2003; BIRCH et al., 2012). In addition, opportunistic (r-strategists) species subbotinids and globanomalinids, are also common inhabitants of the thermocline layers. A rich and highly diverse planktonic community indicates oligotrophic habitats, warm surface water, and a very well strati- fied water column with a stable thermocline. The diversity peaked in the upper part of the late Palaeocene. The predomi- nance of planktonic foraminifera suggests sedimentation in deeper open sea environments (outer shelf to upper bathyal). The latest Palaeocene is assigned as a period of global warming (ZA- CHOS et al., 2001; GUASTY & SPEIJER, 2007). The boundary between the Palaeocene and the lower Eocene is marked by the extinction of several muricate species which was one of the most successful groups during the late Palaeocene. The boundary in- terval is marked by a negative shift in δ13C values, i.e. the carbon isotope excursion (CIE), ALEGRET et al., 2006. This warm pe- riod, also known as the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), is characterized by stressful conditions in the upper mixed layer which was inhabited by muricate planktonic fo- raminifera with a symbiotic mode of life. Global warming that occurred during the PETM possibly caused the loss of the algal photosymbionts, i.e. bleaching (ALEGRET et al., 2006; LU- CIANI et al., 2017 a, b). A similar event connected with muricate species extinction (Acarinina and Morozovelloides) is docu- mented in the upper middle Eocene (WADE, 2004; WADE et al., 2012). In addition, an increase of primary production and eu- trophication, and decrease in oxygen level may also be unfavou- rable elements in the upper mixed layer which led to the extinction of these K-mode strategists. The early Eocene planktonic assemblage is also dominated by muricate warm-water taxa including Acarinina, Morozovella and Igorina, which comprise approximately 40% of the plank- tonic foraminiferal fauna. Muricate species which hosted algal photosymbionts and occupied the upper mixed layer, are the most important calcifiers during the early Eocene (PREMOLI SILVA & BOERSMA, 1988; PEARSON et al., 2006; LUCIANI et al., 2017 a, 2017 b). These low latitude assemblages are also charac- terized by the common Subbotina (20%), Globanomalina (3%) and Chiloguembelina (3%) species. Such domination of warm water taxa indicate a tropical climate, warm surface water and a well-stratified column inhabited by many muricate species. The well-stratified water column, however, provided many niches and supported the species that also prefer cooler sea water such as the subbotinids, parasubbotinids and globanomalinids which inhabi- ted the thermocline layer. The upper part of the lower Eocene is characterized by significant speciation of the genera Subbotina, Parasubbotina and Acarinina and also the first appearance of the genus Turborotalia. Most of the planktonic species that originated in the latest early Eocene continued into the middle Eocene. The trend of speciation continued into the middle Eocene when many new species originated (PREMOLI SILVA & BOERSMA, 1988; PEARSON et al., 2006). The speciation rate exceeded the extinc- tion rate and resulted in the highest diversity of the plankton com- munity during the Palaeogene. These highly diverse planktonic foraminiferal assemblages are characterized by the dominance of specialized (K-mode life strategists) acarininids, morozovel- loids, globigerinathekids, and by the common occurrence of the opportunistic species (r-mode life strategists) subbotinids, tur- borotalids and catapsydraxids (PREMOLI SILVA & BOERSMA, 1988). All these observations suggest the presence of an oligo- trophic ocean with a well-stratified water column that hosted many groups of planktonic foraminifera with different habitat preferences (PEARSON et al., 1993; PEARSON et al., 2001). The ocean stratification was supported by a tropical to subtropical cli- mate and stable thermocline (PEARSON et al., 2001). Both a warm climate and the high intensity of sun light were also favoura- ble for the symbiotic mode of life of the specialized forms with ornamented calcite tests such as Acarinina and Morozovelloides (WADE, 2004). In the upper part of the middle Eocene, the num- ber of muricate species decreased in abundance, indicating cool- ing and the instability of the water column (SEXTON et al., 2006; PREMEC FUĆEK et al., 2010). The last representatives of the larger muricate taxa Acarinina mcgavrani and Morozovelloides crassatus had their highest occurrence (HO) at the middle/late Eocene boundary (WADE, 2004; PREMEC FUĆEK et al., 2010; WADE et al., 2012). The cooling that began in the middle Eocene significantly affected the late Eocene planktonic foraminiferal community G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 29 (CAVELIER et al., 1981; PREMOLI SILVA & BOERSMA, 1988; BOERSMA & PREMOLI SILVA, 1991; HALLOCK et al., 1991; SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002). This climatic change is associated with a shallowing of thermocline depth and increased delivery of nutrients to the surface waters (SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002). These events caused a reduction in the abundance of shallow and warm water species of planktonic foraminifera (SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002). Micropalaeontological results obtained from the studied wells are in accordance with these general trends. Dur- ing the late Eocene, most changes in the planktonic foraminiferal assemblage were associated with the mixed layer and the upper part of the thermocline. Hantkeninids, globigerinatekids and tur- borotalids declined in abundance and diversity during this time. At the same time, the deeper dwelling forms such as Subbotina, Dentoglobigerina, Catapsydrax and Globigerinoides prolife- rated. The cooling that started in the middle Eocene reached its maximum around the Eocene/Oligocene boundary, and this cli- mate transition is marked by a distinct change in the association of planktonic foraminifera (KELLER, 1983, BOERSMA & PRE- MOLI SILVA, 1991; ZACHOS et al., 1996). Warm water species including representatives of the genera Hantkenina, Cribrohant­ kenina and Globigerinatheka, and most representatives of the genus Turborotalia became extinct. The surface mixed layer thinned due to shallowing of the thermocline (SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002), resulting in higher diversity of the deeper dwelling and cool water forms (e.g., genera Dentoglobigerina, Subbotina, Catapsydrax). In addition, a size reduction in specimens of the genus Pseudohastigerina at the Eocene‒Oligocene transition, in- dicated unfavourable environmental conditions. The lower part of the early Oligocene is characterized by the predominance of the genera Dentoglobigerina and Subbotina. They inhabit the deeper part of the water column and do not have symbionts. Instead, they feed on organic particles in the water column (HEMLEBEN et al., 1989), which indicates blooming of phytoplankton and upwelling. A large number of individuals of the opportunistic genera such as Dentoglobigerina, Subbotina and Pseudohastigerina in the early Oligocene indicates thermo- cline shallowing due to mixing of the water mass, which in turn is an indicator of reduced temperatures (BOERSMA & PRE- MOLI SILVA, 1991). Towards the top of the early Oligocene, there was a shift in the distribution of species within the available niches. This is re- flected in an increase in the number of species in the mixed layer and the appearance of specimens of the small spinose symbiont bearing genera Ciperoella (C. ciperoensis, C. angulisuturalis), which are indicators of warmer water temperatures and oligotro- phy (SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002). In the late Oligocene an increase in the number of species of planktonic foraminifera was documented in all wells. This es- pecially applies to the species that inhabit the mixed layer – Glo­ boturborotalita ouachitaensis, G. occlusa, Ciperoella angulisu­ turalis, C. ciperoensis, and Globigerina officinalis. These spinose species are adapted to oligotrophic conditions (HALLOCK et al., 1991; PEARSON, 1998; SPEZZAFERRI et al., 2002) and live in symbiotic relationships with photosynthetic algae, mostly dino- flagellates (HEMLEBEN et al., 1989). Furthermore, the species Trilobatus primordius had its first occurrence in the late Oligo- cene and indicates warmer climatic conditions. At the same time, the number of deep dwelling species (Dentoglobigerina, Subbo­ tina, Catapsydrax) that fed mostly on particulate organic matter was reduced. These observations suggest reduced primary pro- duction and oligotrophy, and gradual warming during the late Oligocene (SPEZZAFERRI & PREMOLI SILVA, 1991; SPEZ- ZAFERRI et al., 2002). 8. CONCLUSION This study focused on the rich, well-preserved and diverse plank- tonic foraminiferal assemblages found in upper Cretaceous to upper Oligocene deposits from exploration wells in the Palmy- rides area of Syria. The upper Cretaceous strata predominantly consist of hemipelagic argillaceous limestones and marls with abundant pelagic microfauna. Palaeocene and Eocene deep-water clayey limestones and marls with a high percentage of planktonic foraminifera (90%) indicate upper bathyal to outer shelf environ- ments. In contrast, Oligocene sandstone, bioclastic limestone and marls with an increasing percentage of benthic foraminifera (70%) indicate sedimentation in middle to inner shelf environ- ments. Global palaeoenvironmental changes are reflected in the composition, speciation and extinction of the examined plank- tonic foraminiferal population. The upper Campanian and Maas- trichtian planktonic fauna is highly diversified with the domina- tion of warm water taxa such as Contusotruncana contusa, Racemiguembelina fructicosa, Globotruncana aegyptiaca, Glo­ botruncana ventricose, Gansserina gansseri, Globotruncanella havanensis, Globotruncanita angulata, Globotruncanita stuarti, Rugoglobigerina macrocephala, Macroglobigerinelloides alvarezi and Pseudotextularia elegans. The most dramatic change oc- curred at the Cretaceous/Palaeocene boundary when most plank- tonic foraminiferal species became extinct. The oldest docu- mented Palaeocene planktonic foraminiferal assemblage in the investigated wells includes Eoglobigerina eobulloides, Globano­ malina archeocompressa, Chiloguembelina morsei, Woodringina claytonensis and Parasubbotina pseudobulloides. This assem- blage is rich in the number of specimens but is not very diverse and indicates a relatively rapid recovery and occurrence of new species with novel abilities, such as spinose wall texture and possible photosymbiotic relationships with algae. The late Palaeocene was characterized by the origination and domination of warm water taxa with complex test morphology such as Morozovella and Acarinina which imply a tropical to sub- tropical climate. The Palaeocene/Eocene boundary is assigned as a period of global warming known as the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), characterized by stressful condi- tions in the upper mixed layer which was inhabited by muricate planktonic foraminifera with a symbiotic mode of life. Even though the plankton were affected, most planktonic foraminiferal species successfully survived into the Eocene and there were no major extinctions. Similar palaeoclimatic and palaeoceanographic trends with the domination of the muricate species Morozovella, Acarinina and Igorina which hosted algal photosymbionts and occupied the upper mixed layer continued into the early Eocene. The upper part of the early Eocene is characterized by significant speciation of the genera Subbotina, Parasubbotina and Acarinina and also first appearance of the genus Turborotalia. The middle Eocene was characterized by intensive specia- tion and the domination of warm water genera such as Morozo­ velloides, Turborotalia, Globigerinatheka and Hantkenina. In contrast to mid latitudes, the three important genera Turborota­ lia, Globigerinatheka and Hantkenina are present in low numbers in the investigated area. Double extinction of the last muricate taxa Acarinina mcgowrani and Morozovelloides crasssatus oc- G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/130 curred at the middle/late Eocene boundary and indicates a changeable climate and water column instability. The Eocene/Oligocene boundary is marked by the extinction of most warm water taxa including the Turborotalia cerroazu­ lensis group, Hantkenina, Globigerinatheka and some subboti- nids, in association with intensive short-term global cooling. The beginning of the Oligocene is characterized by the domination of cool water taxa such as Dentoglobigerina, Globorotaloides, Tenu­ itella and Chiloguembelina. Speciation of the spinoze surface dweller Ciperoella ciperoensis group in the late Oligocene is in- dicative of warming. The lithology, diversity and composition of the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages indicate that the Palmyrides area in Syria was a Tethyan bioprovince with a tropical to subtropical climate from the late Campanian to the end of the Eocene, when deposition took place in deep open marine environments. In con- trast, Oligocene deposits and the microfossil content suggest tem- perate to warm climate and sedimentation in middle to inner shelf environments. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions. We are grateful to Bosiljka GLU- MAC for discussions and critical reading that improved the origi- nal text of the manuscript. We also thank INA-industrija nafte d.d. Zagreb for providing samples for analysis and Renata SLAVKOVIĆ for taking SEM images. REFERENCES ABRAMOVICH, S. & KELLER, G. (2002): High stress late Maastrichtian palaeoenvi- ronment: inference from planktonic foraminifera in Tunisia.– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatolology, Palaeoecology, 178, 145–164. ABRAMOVICH, S., KELLER, G., STÜBEN, D. & BERNER, Z. (2003): Characteriza- tion of late Campanian and Maastrichtian planktonic foraminiferal depth habitats and vital activities based on stable isotopes.– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatolo- logy, Palaeoecology, 202, 1–29. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00572-8 ALEGRET, L., ORTIZ, S., ARENILLAS, I. & MOLINA, E. (2006): Palaeoenvironmen- tal turnover across the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary at the Stratotype section in Dababiya (Egypt) based on benthic foraminifera.– Terra Nova, 17/6, 526–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2005.00645.x ALMOGI-LABIN, A., BEIN, A. & SASS, E. (1993): Late Cretaceous upwelling system along the southern Tethys (Israel): interrelationship between productivity, bottom water environmens, and organic matter preservation.– Paleoceanography, 8, 671–690. doi: 10.1029/93PA02197 ARENILLAS, I., ARZ, J.A., GRAJALES-NISHIMURA, J., MURILLO-MUÑETON, G., ALVAREZ, W., CAMARGO-ZANOGUERA, A., MOLINA, E. & ROSALES- DOMÍNGUEZ, C. (2006): Chicxulub impact event is Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in age: New micropaleontological evidence.– Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 249, 241‒257. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.07.020 BÉ, A.W.H. (1982): Biology of Planktonic Foraminifera.– In: BUZAS, M.A. & SEN GUPTA, B.K. (eds.): Notes for a Short Course, 219.– University of Tennessee, Dep. Geol. Sci., Studies in Geology, New Orleans, 51–89. BERGGREN, W.A. & PEARSON, P.N. (2005): A revised tropical to subtropical Paleo- gene planktonic foraminifera zonation.– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 35/4, 279–298. BERGGREN, W.A., KENT, D.V., SWISHER C.C. & AUBRY, M. (1995): A Revised Ce- nozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy.– In: BERGGREN, W.A., KENT, D.V., AUBRY, M. & HARDENBOL, J. (eds.): Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation.– Special publication of Society for Sedimentary Geology, 129–212. doi: 10.2110/pec.95.04.0129 BIRCH, H.S., COXALL, H.K. & PEARSON, P.N. (2012): Evolutionary ecology of Ear- ly Paleocene planktonic foraminifera: size, depth habitat and symbionts.– Paleobio- logy, 38/3, 374‒390. doi: 10.1666/11027.1 BOERSMA, A. (1988): Foraminifera.– In: HAQ, B.U. & BOERSMA, A. (eds.): Intro- duction to Marine Micropaleontology.– Elsevier Science, Singapore, 19–78. doi: 10.1016/B978-044482672-5/50002-7 BOERSMA, A. & PREMOLI SILVA, I. (1991): Distribution of Paleogene planktonic foraminifera – analogies with the Recent?– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 83, 29–48. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(91)90074-2 BOLLI, H.M., BECKMANN, J.P. & SAUNDERS, J.B. (1994): Benthic foraminifera bio- stratigraphy of the south Caribbean region.– Cambridge University Press, 408 p. BREW, G.E. (2001): Tectonic evolution of Syria interpreted from integrated geophysical and geological analysis.– PhD Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 323 p. BREW, G., BARAZANGI, M., AL-MALEH, A.K. & SAWAF, T. (2001): Tectonic and geologic evolution of Syria.– GeoArabia, 6/4, 573–616. CARON, M. (1985): Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera.– In: BOLLI, H.M., SAUN- DERS, J.B. & PERCH NIELSEN, K. (eds.), Planktonic Stratigraphy.– Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 17–86. CAVELIER, C., CHATEAUNEUF, J., POMEROL, C., RABUSSIER, D., RENARD, M. & VERGNAUD-GRAZZINI, C. (1981): The geological events at the Eocene/Oli- gocene boundary.– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 36, 223–248. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(81)90108-5 CHAIMOV, T A., BARAZANGI, M., AL-SAAD, D., SAWAF, T. & GEBRAN, A. (1992): Mesozoic and Cenozoic deformation inferred from seismic stratigraphy in the south- western intracontinental Palmyride fold-thrust belt, Syria.– Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 104, 704‒715. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(192)104 COHEN, K.M., FINNEY, S.C., GIBBARD, P.L. & FAN, J.-X. (2013; updated): The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes, 36, 199‒204. URL: http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2020-01.pdf DACER, G., STANKOVIĆ, D., MESIĆ, I.A. & IVANIČEK, Z. (2007): Upper Campa- nian to Maastrichtian foraminiferal assemblages of the Palmyra region, Syria.– Ge- ophysical Research Abstracts, Cd, European Geosciences Union, Vienna, 9. D’HONDT, S., ZACHOS, J.C. & SCHULTZ, G. (1994): Stable isotops signals and pho- tosymbiosis in Late Paleocene planktic foraminifera.– Paleobiology, 20/3, 391–406. EDGAR, K.M., WILSON. P.A., SEXTON, P.F., GIBBS, S.J., ROBERTS, A.P. & NOR- RIS, R.D. (2010): New biostratigraphic, magnetostratigraphic and isotopic insights into the Middle Eocene Climatic optimum in low latitudes.– Palaeogeography, Pa- laeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 297, 670–682. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.09.016 FLÜGEL, E. (2010): Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks.– Springer, 984 p. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-642-03796-2 GASIŃSKI, M.A. & UCHMAN, A. (2009): Latest Maastrichtian foraminiferal assem- blages from the Husów region (Skole Nappe, Outer Carpathians, Poland).– Geolo- gia Charpatica, 60/4, 283–294. doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0020-5 GAWOR-BIEDOWA, E. (1984): Foraminiferal zonation of the Upper Cretaceous de- posites in Poland (except for the Carpathians and Sudeten). Second international Symposium of Benthic Foraminifera, Pau, Benthos′83.– Revue de Paléobiologie, 1, 213–233. GRÄFE, K.U. (2005): Late Creatceous benthic foraminifers from the Basque-Cantabrian Basin, northern Spain.– Journal of Iberian Geology, 31/2, 277–298. GUASTI, E. & SPEIJER, R.P. (2007): The Paleocene‒Eocene Thermal Maximun of the planktic foraminiferal record.– GSA Special Papers, 424, 53‒67. HALLOCK, P. (1987): Fluctuations in the trophic resource continuum: A factor in global diversity cycles.– Paleoceanography, 215, 457–471. doi: 10.1029/PA002i005p00457 HALLOCK, P., PREMOLI SILVA, I. & BOERSMA, A. (1991): Similarities between planktonic and larger foraminiferal evolutionary trends through Paleogene pale- oceanographic changes.– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 83, 49–64. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(91)90075-3 HAQ, B.U. (1981): Paleogene paleoceanography: Early Cenozoic oceans revisited.– Oceanographica Acta, Suppl. to Vol. 4, Proc. 26th Int. Geol. Congress, 71−82. HAQ, B.U., HARDENBOL, J. & VAIL, P.R. (1987): Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic.– Science, 235, 1156‒1167. doi: 10.1126/science.235.4793.1156 HARDENBOL, J., THIERRY, J., FARLEY, M.B., JACQUIN, T., DE GRACIANSKY, P.C. & VAIL, P.R. (1998): Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework of European basins.– SEPM Special Publication 60, 3–13. doi: 10.2110/ pec.98.02.0003 HEMLEBEN, C., SPINDLER, M. & ANDERSON, O.R. (1989): Modern Planktonic Fo- raminifera.– Springer-Verlag, New York, 363 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3544-6 HEMLEBEN, C., MUHLEN, D., OLSSON, R.K. & BERGGREN, W. (1991): Surface texture and the first occurrence of spines in planktonic foraminifera from the early Tertiary.– Geologische Jahrbuch, 128, 117‒146. HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M., PREMEC FUĆEK, V. & SLAVKOVIĆ, R. (2005): Plank- tonic Foraminifera turnover at the Eocene/Oligocene Boundary (Palmyra Region, Syria).– In: VELIĆ, I., VLAHOVIĆ, I. & BIONDIĆ, R. (eds.): Proceedings, Third Croatian Geological Congress, Opatija, 55–56. HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M., PREMEC FUĆEK, V., SLAVKOVIĆ, R. & MESIĆ, I.A. (2006): Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Late Eocene and Oligocene in the Palmyride area, Syria.– Geologia Croatica, 59/1, 19–39. HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M. (2008): Oligocene planktonic foraminiferal associations from selected localities of Neotethys.– Master Thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Zagreb, 101 p. HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M., PREMEC FUĆEK, V., HUBER, B.T. & WADE, B.S. (2014): The test size and abundance variations in planktonic foraminifera Chi­ loguembelina cubensis and C. ototara as response to climatic events in the Oligo- cene. CBEP 2014, Ferrara, Italy, July 1‒6.– In: DICKENS, G. & LUCIANI, V. G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 31 (eds.): Rendiconti online della Società Geologica Italiana, Roma, 31, 103‒104. doi: 10.3301/ROL.2014.68 HUBER, B., HODELL, D.A. & HAMILTON, C.R. (1995): Middle–Late Cretaceous of the southern high latitudes: Stable isotopic evidence for minimal equator-to-poole thermal gradients.– GSA Bulettin, 1164–1191. doi: 10.1130/0016- 7606(1995)107 <1164:MLCCOT>2.3.CO;2 IACCARINO, S.M., PREMOLI SILVA, I., BIOLZI, M., FORESI, M., LIRER, F. & PETRIZZO, M.R. (2005): Practical Manual of Oligocene to Middle Miocene Plank- tonic Foraminifera.– International School on Planktonic Foraminifera, Universita degli Studi di Perugia, Università degli Studi di Parma, Universita degli Studi di Milano, 124 p. ISMAIL, A.A. (1992): Maastrichtian-Early Eocene benthonic foraminiferal biostratigra- phy and palaeoecology of west central Sinai, Egypt.– M.E.R.C. Ain Shams Univer- sity, Earth Science Series, 6, 139–150. ISMAIL, A.A., HUSSEIN-KAMEL, Y., BOUKHARY, M. & GHANDOUR, A.A.A. (2007): Campanian-Early Eocene Stratigraphy of the Southern Galala Plateau, East- ern Desert, Egypt.– Geologia Croatica, 60/2, 115–137. KAIHO, K. (1998): Phylogeny of deep-sea calcareous trochospiral benthic foraminifera: evolution and diversification.– Micropaleontology, 44/3, 291–311. doi: 10.2307/1486051 KATZ, M., MILLER, K.G., WRIGHT, J.D., WADE, B.S., BROWNING. J.V., CRAMER, B.S. & ROSENTHAL, Y. (2008): Stepwise transition from the Eocene greenhouse to the Oligocene icehouse.– Nature geoscience, 1, 44/3, 229–334. doi: 10.1038/ ngeo179 KELLER, G. (1983): Biochronology and paleoclimatic implications of Middle Eocene to Oligocene planktonic foraminiferal faunas.– Marine Micropaleontology, 7, 463–486. KOUTSOUKOS, E.A.M. (2014): Phenotypic plasticity, speciation, and phylogeny in early Danian planktic foraminifera.– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 44/2, 109–142. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.44.2.109 KRASHENINNIKOV, V.A., GOLOVIN, D.I. & MOURAVYOV, V.I. (1996): The Pale- ogene of Syria – Stratigraphy, Lithology, Geochronology.– Geologisches Jahrbuch Reiche B, B 86, 136. KRIŽ, J., FORŠEK, G., IVKOVIĆ, Ž. & LUČIĆ, D. (2005): Hydrocarbon discoveries in Syria-Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic petroleum systems.– In: VELIĆ, I., VLAHOVIĆ, I. & BIONDIĆ, R. (eds.): Proceedings, Third Croatian Geological Congress, Opatija, Croatia, 79–80. LITAK, R.K., BARAZANGI, M., BREW, G., SAWAF, T. & AL-YOUSSEF, W. (1998): Structure and evolution of the petroliferous Euphrates graben system, southeast Syria.– AAPG Bulletin, 82/6, 1173–1190. LOEBLICH, A.R. & TAPPAN, H. (1988): Foraminiferal genera and their classification. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology.– Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 970 p. LUCIANI, V., D’ONOFRIO, R., DICKENS, G.R., & WADE, B.S. (2017a): Did photo- symbiont bleaching lead to the demise of planktic foraminifer Morozovella at the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum?– Paleoceanography, 32, 1115–1136. LUCIANI, V., D’ONOFRIO, R., DICKENS, G.R. & WADE, B.S. (2017b): Planktic fo- raminiferal response to early Eocene carbon cycle perturbations in the southeast Atlantic Ocean (ODP Site 1263).– Global and Planetary Change, 158, 119‒133. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.007 LUČIĆ, D. & FORŠEK, G. (2000): Palmyride evolution: geologic, stratigraphic and struc- tural overview (Central Syria).– In: VLAHOVIĆ, I. & BIONDIĆ, R. (eds.): Pro- ceedings, Second Croatian Geological Congress, Cavtat, Croatia, 311–316. LUČIĆ, D. (2001): Litostratigraphical and petrographical Guidebook of the typical fa- cies in the wider area of Hayan Block (Palmyrides, Syria).– INA Report, Damascus, 47 p. LUČIĆ, D., MARETIĆ, S., FORŠEK, G., TAKAČ, D. & MESIĆ, I. (2002): Mesozoic Carbonate Facies and Reservoirs in Central Palmyrides, Syria.– Abstract, Cd, Ameri can Association of Petroleum Geologists Conference, Cairo. LY, A. & KUHNT, W. (1994): Late Cretaceous benthic foraminiferal assemblages of the Casamance shelf (Senegal, NW Africa). Indication of a late Cretaceous oxygen minimum zone.– Revue de Micropaléontologie, 37/1, 49–74. MACKENSEN, A. (2004): Changing Southern Ocean palaeocirculation and effects on global climate.– Antarctic Science, 16/4, 369–386. doi: 10.1017/ S0954102004002202 MACLEOD, K.G., WHITNEY, D.L., HUBER, B.T. & KOEBERL, C. (2007): Impact and extinction in remarkably complete Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sections from Demerara Rise, tropical western North Atlantic.– GSA Bulletin, 119, 1/2, 101‒115. doi: 10.1130/B25955.1 MILLER, K.M., BROWNING, J.V., AUBRY,M.-P., WADE, B.S., KATZ, M.E., KUL- PECZ, A.A. & WRIGHT, J.D. (2008): Eocene–Oligocene global climate and sea-le- vel changes: St. Stephens Quarry, Alabama.– GSA Bulletin, 120,1/2, 34‒53. doi: 10.1130/B26105.1 MILLER, K.G., JANECEK, T.R., KATZ, M. & KEIL, D.J. (1987): Abyssal circulation and benthic foraminiferal changes near the Paleocene/Eocene boundary.– Pale- oceanography, 2/6, 741‒761. doi: 10.1029/PA002i006p00741 MOUTY, M. & AL-MALEH, K. (1983): The geological study of the Palmyridian chain using ideal geological sections for exploration purposes and geological survey.– General Establishment of Geology and Mineral Resources, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Damascus, Syria, 4, 950 p. MURRAY, J.W. (1991): Ecology and Paleoecology of Benthic Foraminifera.– Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, 397 p. NORRIS, R.D. (1996): Symbiosis as an evolutionary innovation in the radiation of Pa- leocene planktonic foraminifera.– Paleobiology, 22, 461‒480. OLSSON, R.K., HEMLEBEN, C., BERGGREN, W.A. & HUBER, B.T. (1999): Atlas of Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera.– Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, No. 85, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 252 p. doi: 10.5479/ si.00810266.85.1 PEARSON, P.N., SHACKLETON, N.J. & HALL, M.A. (1993): Stable isotope paleoeco- logy of middle Eocene planktonic foraminifera and multi-species isotope stratigra- phy, DSDP Site 523, South Atlantic.– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 23/2, 123–140. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.23.2.123 PEARSON, P.N. (1998): Stable isotopes and the study of evolution in planktonic fo- raminifera.– In: NORRIS, R.D. & CORFIELD, R.M. (eds.): Isotope Paleobiology and Paleoecology.– Paleontol. Soc. Papers, 4, 138–178. doi: 10.1017/ S1089332600000425 PEARSON, P.N., DITCHFIELD, P.W., SIGNANO, J., HARCOURT-BROWN, K.G., NICHOLAS, C.J., OLSSON, R.K., SHACKLETON, N.J. & HALL, M.A. (2001): Warm tropical sea surface temperatures in the late Cretaceous and Eocene epochs.– Nature, 413, 481–487. doi: 10.1038/35097000 PEARSON, P.N., OLSSON, R.K., HUBER, B.T., HEMLEBEN, C. & BERGGREN, W.A. (2006): Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera.– The Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Paper, 41, 513 p. PECIMOTIKA, G., CVETKO TEŠOVIĆ, B. & PREMEC FUĆEK, V. (2014): Plank- tonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Upper Cretaceous deposits from the Palmyride Region, Syria.– Geologia Croatica, 67/2, 87‒110. doi: 10.4154/ GC.2014.07 PÉREZ RODRÍGEZ, I., LEES, J.A., LARRASOANA, J.C., ARZ, J.A. & ARENILLAS, I. (2012): Planktonic foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of the uppermost Campanian and Maastrichtian at Zumaia, northern Spain.– Cretaceous Research, 37, 100–126. doi: 10.1016/j.cre- tres.2012.03.011 PETRIZZO, M.R. (2002): Palaeocenographic and palaeoclimatic inferences from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal assemblages from the Exmouth Plateau (ODP Sites 762 and 763, eastern Indian Ocean).– Marine Micropaleontology, 45, 117‒150. PETRIZZO, M.R., FALZONI, F. & PREMOLI SILVA, I. (2011): Identification of the base of the lower to middle Campanian Globotruncana ventricosa Zone: comments on reliability and global correlations.– Cretaceous Research, 32, 387–405. PETTIJOHN, F.J. (1975): Sedimentary Rocks.– 3rd ed., Harper and Row, New York, NY. PREMEC-FUĆEK, V., PEARSON, P.N. & HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M. (2010): The biostratigraphy and stable isotope paleoecology of the late Middle Eocene plank- tonic foraminifera (North Adriatic Sea, Croatia).– FORAMS 2010, September 5–10, Abstract book, 165‒166. PREMEC-FUĆEK, V., HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M. & HUBER, B. (2018): Taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and phylogeny of Oligocene Chiloguembelina and Jenkinsina.– In WADE et al. (eds.): Atlas of Oligocene Planktonic Foraminifera. Cush. Found. Spec Publ., 46, 528 p. PREMOLI SILVA, I. & BOERSMA, A. (1988): Atlantic Eocene planktonic foraminiferal historical biogeography and paleohydrogeographic indices.– Paleogeography, Pale- oclimatology, Paleoecology, 67, 315–356. PREMOLI SILVA, I. & SLITER, W., V. (1995): Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal bi- ostratigraphy and evolutionary trends from the Bottacioni section, Gubbio, Italy.– Paleontographica Italica 82, 1–89. PREMOLI SILVA, I. & SLITER, W.V. (1999): Cretaceous Paleoceanography: Evidence from planktonic foraminiferal evolution.– In: BARRERA, E. & JOHNSON, C.C. (eds.): The Evolution of Cretaceous Ocean–Climatic System.– GSA, Special Paper, 332, 301–328. doi: 10.1130/0-8137-2332-9.301 PREMOLI SILVA, I. & VERGA, D. (2004): Practical manual of Cretaceous planktonic Foraminifera. International School on Planktonic Foraminifera.– In: VERGA, D. & RETTORI, R. (eds.): International School on Planktonic Foraminifera, 3rd Course: Cretaceous. University of Perugia and Milano, Tipografia Pontfelecino, Perugia (Italy), p. 283. PREMOLI SILVA, I. & PETRIZZO, M.R. (2006): Practical Manual of Eocene Plank- tonic Foraminifera.– International School on Planktonic Foraminifera, Universita degli Studi di Perugia, Universita degli Studi di Milano. Perugia, 248 p. QUILLÉVÉRÉ, F., NORRIS, R., MOUSSA, I. & BERGGREN, W. (2001). Role of pho- tosymbiosis and biogeography in the diversification of early Paleogene acarininids (planktonic foraminifera).– Paleobiology, 27/2, 311–326. ROBASZYNSKI, F., CARON, M., GONZALES, J.M. & WONDERS, A.H. (eds.) (1984): Atlas of Late Cretaceous globotruncanids.– Revue de Micropaleontologie, 26, 145–305. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107%3C1164:MLCCOT%3E2.3.CO;2 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107%3C1164:MLCCOT%3E2.3.CO;2 G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/132 ROBASZYNSKI, F. & CARON, M. (1995): Foraminifers planctoniques du Crétacé: com- mentaire de la zonation Europe-Méditerrané.– Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 6, 681–692. SARI, B. (2006): Upper Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Bey Dağlari Autochthon in the Korkuteli area, western Taurides, Turkey.– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 36, 241–261. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.36.3.241 SARI, B. (2009): Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Coniacian-Maastrichtian sequences of the Bey Dağlari Autochton, western Taurides, Turkey: thin-section zonation.– Cretaceous Research, 30, 1103–1132. SEXTON, P.F., WILSON, P.A. & PEARSON, P.N. (2006): Palaeoecology of late middle Eocene planktic foraminifera and evolutionary implications.– Marine Micropaleon- tology, 60/1–6, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2006.02.006 SHACKLETON, N.J., CORFIELD, R.M. & HALL, M.A. (1985): Stable isotope data and the ontogeny of Paleocene planktonic foraminifera.– Journal of Foraminiferal Re- search, 15/4, 321–336. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.15.4.321 SPEZZAFERRI, S. & PREMOLI SILVA, I. (1991): Oligocene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoclimatic interpretation from Hole 538A, DSDP Leg 77, Gulf of Mexico.– Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 83, 217–236. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(91)90080-B SPEZZAFERRI, S. (1994): Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and taxonomy of the Oligocene and lower Miocene in the oceanic record. An overview.– Paleontographi- ca Italica, 81, 1–187. SPEZZAFERRI, S., BASSO, D. & COCCIONI, R. (2002): Late Eocene planktonic fo- raminiferal response to an extraterrestrial impact at Massignano GSSP (Northeast- ern Appennines, Italy).– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 32/2, 188–199. doi: 10.2113/0320188 STANKOVIĆ, D., PREMEC FUĆEK, V., HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M., MARIĆ ĐUREKOVIĆ, Ž., IVAK, P., SLAVKOVIĆ, R. & BARBIĆ, Z. (2003): Biostratig- raphy and sedimentology of the Campanian and Maastrichtian sediments in the Palmyra-1 well, Palmyrides, Syria.– In: VLAHOVIĆ, I. (ed.): Abstracts book, 22nd IAS Meeting of Sedimentology, Opatija, Croatia, p. 201. STANKOVIĆ, D., MESIĆ, I.A., IVANIČEK, Z., HERNITZ KUČENJAK, M. & PRE- MEC FUĆEK, V. (2005): Upper Campanian to Maastrichtian foraminiferal assem- blages of the Palmyra region, Syria.– In: VELIĆ, I., VLAHOVIĆ, I. & BIONDIĆ, R. (eds.): Proceedings, Third Croatian Geological Congress, Opatija, Croatia, p. 127. TOMLJENOVIĆ, B., VESELI, V. & TAKAČ, D. (2008): Surface and subsurface struc- tural styles in central Syria.– Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineer- ing, University of Zagreb, Croatia, 81 p. VAN DER ZWAAN, G.J., JORISSEN, F.J. & DE STIGTER, H.C. (1990): The depth de- pendency of planktonic/benthic foraminiferal ratios: Constraints and applications.– Marine Geology, 95, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(90)90016-D WADE, B.S. (2004): Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and mechanisms in the ex- tinction of Morozovella in the late middle Eocene.– Marine Micropaleontology, 51, 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2003.09.001 WADE, B.S., PEARSON, P.N., BERGGREN, W.A. & PÄLIKE, H. (2011): Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibra- tion to the geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale.– Earth-Science Re- views, 104, 111‒142. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.003 WADE, B.S. (2012): Successive extinction of muricate planktonic foraminifera (Morozo- velloides and Acarinina) as a candidate for marking the base Priabonian.– Newslet- ters on stratigraphy, 45/3, 245‒262. doi: 10.1127/0078-0421/2012/0023 WADE, B.S., OLSSON, R., PEARSON, P.N., HUBER, B.T. & BERGGREN, W.A. (2018): Atlas of Oligocene planktonic foraminifera.– The Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 46, 528 p. WIDMARK, J.G.V. & SPEIJER, R.P. (1997): Benthic foraminiferal faunas and trophic regimes at the terminal Cretaceous Tethyan seafloor.– Palaios, 12, 354–371. doi: 10.2307/3515335 ZACHOS, J., PAGANI, M., SLOAN, L., THOMAS, E. & BILLUPS, K. (2001): Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present.– Science, 292, 686–693. doi: 10.1126/science.1059412 ZACHOS, J.C., QUINN, T.M. & SALAMY, K.A. (1996): High-resolution (104 years) deep-sea foraminiferal stable isotope records of the Eocene–Oligocene climate tran- sition.– Paleoceanography, 11/3, 251–266. G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 33 Appendix List of planktonic foraminifera species cited in the text and figure explanation, in alphabetic order according to genus: Cretaceous Archaeoglobigerina blowi PESSAGNO, 1967 Contusotruncana contusa (CUSHMAN, 1926) Contusotruncana fornicata (PLUMMER, 1931) Gansserina gansseri (BOLLI, 1951) Globotruncana aegyptiaca NAKKADY, 1950 Globotruncana arca (CUSHMAN, 1926) Globotruncana bulloides VOGLER, 1941 Globotruncana conica (WHITE, 1928) Globotruncana insignis GANDOLFI, 1955 Globotruncana rosetta (CARSEY, 1926) Globotruncana ventricosa WHITE, 1928 Globotruncanella havanensis (VOORWIJK 1937) Globotruncanella pschadae (KELLER, 1946) Globotruncanita angulata (TILEV, 1951) Globotruncanita conica (WHITE, 1928) Globotruncanita stuarti (De LAPPARENT, 1918) Heterohelix globulosa (EHRENBERG, 1840) Heterohelix striata (EHRENBERG, 1840) Macroglobigerinelloides alvarezi (ETERNOD OLVERA, 1959) Macroglobigerinelloides bollii (PESSAGNO, 1967) Macroglobigerinelloides prairiehillensis (PESSAGNO, 1967) Muricohedbergella holmdelensis (OLSSON, 1964) Muricohedbergella monmouthensis (OLSSON, 1960) Plummerita hantkeninoides (BRÖENNIMANN, 1952) Pseudotextularia elegans (RZEHAK, 1891) Racemiguembelina fructicosa (EGGER, 1902) Radotruncana calcarata (CUSHMAN, 1927) Radotruncana subspinosa (PESSAGNO, 1960) Rugoglobigerina macrocephala BRÖENNIMANN, 1952 Rugoglobigerina rugosa (PLUMMER, 1926) Palaeogene Acarinina bullbrooki (BOLLI, 1957) Acarinina coalingensis (CUSHMAN & HANNA, 1927) Acarinina collactea (FINLAY, 1939) Acarinina cuneicamerata (BLOW, 1979) Acarinina echinate (BOLLI, 1957) Acarinina mcgowrani WADE & PEARSON, 2006 Acarinina mckannai (WHITE, 1928) Acarinina medizzai (TOUMARKINE & BOLLI, 1975) Acarinina pentacamerata (SUBBOTINA, 1947) Acarinina praetopilensis (BLOW, 1979) Acarinina primitive (FINLAY, 1947) Acarinina pseudotopilensis SUBBOTINA, 1953 Acarinina quetra (BOLLI, 1957) Acarinina rohri (BRÖNNIMANN & BERMÚDEZ, 1953) Acarinina sibaiyaensis (EL-NAGGAR, 1966) Acarinina soldadoensis (BRÖNNIMANN, 1952) Acarinina topilensis (CUSHMAN, 1925) Cassigeriella chipolensis (CUSHMAN & PONTON, 1932) Catapsydrax unicavus BOLLI, LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957 Chiloguembelina adriatica PREMEC FUĆEK, HERNITZ KUČENJAK & HUBER, 2018 Chiloguembelina andreae PREMEC FUĆEK, HERNITZ KUČENJAK & HUBER, 2018 Chiloguembelina crinita (GLAESSNER, 1937) Chiliguembelina cubensis (PALMER, 1934) Chiloguembelina midwayensis (CUSHMAN, 1940) Chiloguembelina morsei (KLINE, 1943) Chiloguembelina ototara (FINLAY, 1940) Chiloguembelina wilcoxensis (CUSHMAN & PONTON, 1932) Ciperoella anguliofficinalis (BLOW, 1969) Ciperoella angulisuturalis (BOLLI, 1957) Ciperoella ciperoensis (BOLLI, 1954) Cribrohantkenina inflata (HOWE, 1928) Dentoglobigerina galavisi (BERMÚDEZ, 1961) Dentoglobigerina pseudovenezuelana (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Dentoglobigerina tapuriensis (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Dentoglobigerina tripartita (KOCH, 1926) Eoglobigerina edita (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Eoglobigerina eobulloides (MOROZOVA, 1959) Globanomalina archeocompressa (BLOW, 1979) Globanomalina australiformis (JENKINS, 1966) Globanomalina chapmani (PARR, 1938) Globanomalina compressa (PLUMMER, 1927) Globanomalina ehrenbergi (BOLLI, 1957) Globanomalina imitata (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Globanomalina planocompressa (SHUTSKAYA, 1965) Globanomalina planoconica (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Globanomalina pseudomenardii (BOLLI, 1957) Globigerina officinalis SUBBOTINA, 1953 Globigerinatheka barri BRÖNNIMANN, 1952 Globigerinatheka curryi PROTO DECIMA & BOLLI, 1970 Globigerinatheka index (FINLAY, 1939) Globigerinatheka kugleri (BOLLI, LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957) Globigerinatheka luterbacheri BOLLI, 1972 Globigerinatheka subconglobata (SHUTSKAYA, 1958) Globigerinatheka tropicalis (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Globoturborotalita martini (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Globoturborotalita occlusa (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Globoturborotalita ouachitaensis (HOWE & WALLACE, 1932) Guembelitrioides nuttalli (HAMILTON, 1953) Hantkenina alabamensis CUSHMAN, 1924 Hantkenina dumblei WEINZIERL & APPLIN, 1929 Hantkenina nanggulanensis HARTONO, 1969 Igorina albeari (CUSHMAN & BERMÚDEZ, 1949) Igorina broedermanni (CUSHMAN & BERMÚDEZ, 1949) Igorina pusilla (BOLLI, 1957) Igorina tadjikistanensis (BYKOVA, 1953) Jenkinsina columbiana (HOWE, 1939) Morozovella acuta (TOULMIN, 1941) Morozovella aequa (CUSHMAN & RENZ, 1942) Morozovella angulata (WHITE, 1928) Morozovella aragonensis (NUTTALL, 1930) Morozovella crater (HORNIBROOK, 1958) Morozovella edgari (PREMOLI SILVA & BOLLI, 1973) Morozovella formosa (BOLLI, 1957) G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/134 Morozovella occlusa (LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957) Morozovella pasionensis (BERMUDÉZ, 1961) Morozovella praeangulata (BLOW, 1979) Morozovella subbotinae (MOROZOVA, 1939) Morozovella velascoensis (CUSHMAN, 1925) Morozovelloides bandyi (FLEISHER, 1974) Morozovelloides coronatus (BLOW, 1979) Morozovelloides crassatus (CUSHMAN, 1925) Morozovelloides lehneri (CUSHMAN & JARVIS, 1929) Paragloborotalia griffinoides OLSSON & PEARSON, 2006 Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (PLUMMER, 1927) Planorotalites pseudoscitula (GLAESSNER, 1937) Praemurica inconstans (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Praemurica? lozanoi (COLOM, 1954) Praemurica pseudoinconstans (BLOW, 1979) Pseudohastigerina micra (COLE, 1927) Pseudohastigerina naguewichiensis (MYATLIUK, 1950) Pseudohastigerina wilcoxensis (CUSHMAN & PONTON, 1932) Streptochilus martini (PIJPERS, 1933) Streptochilus pristinum BRÖNNIMANN & RESIG, 1971 Subbotina cancellata BLOW, 1979 Subbotina corpulenta (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Subbotina crociapertura BLOW, 1979 Subbotina eocaena (GUEMBEL, 1968) Subbotina linaperta (FINLAY, 1939) Subbotina senni (BECKMANN, 1953) Subbotina triangularis (WHITE, 1928) Subbotina triloculinoides (PLUMMER, 1927) Subbotina trivialis (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Subbotina utilisindex (JENKINS & ORR, 1973) Subbotina velascoensis (CUSHMAN, 1925) Subbotina yeguaensis (WEINZIERL & APPLIN, 1929) Tenuitella gemma (JENKINS, 1966) Trilobatus primordius (BLOW & BANNER, 1962) Turborotalia ampliapertura (BOLLI, 1957) Turborotalia cerroazulensis (COLE, 1928) Turborotalia cocoaensis (CUSHMAN, 1928) Turborotalia cunialensis (TOUMARKINE & BOLLI, 1970) Turborotalia frontosa (SUBBOTINA, 1953) Turborotalia increbescens (BANDY, 1949) Turbototalia pomeroli (TOUMARKINE & BOLLI, 1970) Turbototalia possagnoensis (TOUMARKINE & BOLLI, 1970) Woodringina claytonensis LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957 Zeauvigerina waiparaensis (JENKINS, 1966) G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 35 Plate 1 Figs. 1–15, Upper Campanian–Maastrichtian; scale bar 100 μm. 1. Gansserina gansseri, J-5, 1360–1370 m; 2. Globotruncanita conica, J-5, 1370–1380 m; 3. Globotruncana aegyptiaca, J-3, 1540–1545 m; 4. Globotruncana arca, J-3, 1540–1545 m; 5. Globotruncana ventricosa, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 6. Globotruncanella havanensis, J-5, 1360–1370 m; 7. Rugoglobigerina rugosa, J-5, 1340–1350 m; 8. Globotruncana bulloides, J-5, 1370–1380 m; 9. Macroglobigerinelloides prairiehillensis, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 10. Macroglobigerinelloides bolli, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 11.  Muricohedbergella holmdelensis, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 12. Muricohedbergella monmouthensis, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 13. Heterohelix globulosa, J-5, 1340–1350 m; 14.  Archaeoglobigerina blowi, J-4, 1735–1755 m; 15. Pseudotextularia elegans, J-5, 1340–1350 m. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/136 Plate 2 Figs. 1–7, Lower Palaeocene; Figs. 8–15; Upper Palaeocene; scale bar 100 μm 1. Eoglobigerina eobulloides, 1700–1710 m; 2. Parasubbotina pseudobulloides, J-3, Core-2, 1604–1613 m, I m, 20 cm; 3. Woodringina claytonensis, J-2, 1700–1710 m; 4. and 5. Subbotina triloculinoides, J-3, 1540–1545 m; 6. Chiloguembelina morsei, J-3, 1540–1545 m; 7. Morozovella praeangulata, J-2, 1550–1560 m; 8. Morozovella an­ gulata, J-3, 1285–1290 m; 9. Morozovella angulata J-2, 1540–1550 m; 10. Igorina pussila, J-2, 1510–1520 m; 11. Subbotina cancellata, J-2, 1450–1460 m; 12. Subbotina cf. triangularis, J-2, 1270–1280 m; 13. Acarinina coalingensis, J-2, 1370–1380 m; 14. Acarinina cf. soldadoensis, J-2, 1285–1290 m; 15. Acarinina sp., J-2, 1300-1310 m. G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 37 Plate 3 Figs. 1–12, Lower Eocene, scale bar 100 μm 1. Morozovella subbotinae, J-2, 1160–1180 m; 2. Morozovella aequa, J-2, 1160–1180 m; 3. Acarinina pentacamerata, J-3, Core-1 (842-852 m), VII m, 70 cm; 4. Globano­ malina planoconica., J-2, 1070–1080 m; 5. Igorina cf. broedermanni, J-2, 1200–1220 m; 6. Acarinina cuneicamerata, J-3, Core-1 (842–852 m), VII m, 70 cm; 7. Acarinina bullbrooki, J-2, 1160–1170 m; 8. Turborotalia frontosa, J-1, 885-890 m; 9. Subbotina eocaena, J-2, 1160–1180 m; 10. Subbotina eocaena J 2, 1190–1200 m; 11. Subbotina linaperta, J-2, 1100-1110 m; 12. Subbotina sp., J-2, 1160-1170 m. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/138 Plate 4 Figs. 1–12, Middle Eocene, scale bar 100 μm 1. Hantkenina cf. dumblei, J-3, 520–530 m; 2. Globigerinatheka curryi, J-3, 520–530 m; 3. Globigerinatheka subconglobata, J-3, 520–530 m; 4. Morozovelloides cf. ban­ dyi, J-2, 720–740 m; 5. Acarinina mcgowrani, J-2, 680–700 m; 6. Acarinina topilensis, J-1, 540–550 m; 7. Morozovelloides crassatus, J-3, 520-530 m; 8. Morozovelloides lehneri, J-2, 720–740 m; 9. Subbotina eocaena, J-3, 520–530 m; 10. Subbotina linaperta, J-1, 540–560 m; 11. Turbototalia pomeroli, J-1, 700–720 m; 12. Turborotalia cerroazulensis, J-1, 600–610 m. G eologia C roatica Premec Fućek et al.: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and lithology of the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian-Maastrichtian) ... 39 Plate 5 Figs. 1–12, Upper Eocene, scale bar 100 μm 1. Turborotalia cerroazulensis, J-3, 370–380 m; 2. and 3. Turborotalia cocoaensis, J-6, 440–460 m; 4. Turborotalia ampliapetura, J-2, 560–580 m; 5. Turborotalia cuni­ alensis, J-6, 440–460 m; 6. Globigerinatheka barri, J-2, 600–620 m; 7. Hantkenina alabamensis, J-5, 280–290 m; 8. Subbotina linaperta, J-3, 370–380 m; 9. Subbotina yeguaensis, J-6, 440–460 m; 10. Dentoglobigerina galavisi, J-6, 440–460 m; 11. Globoturborotalita ouachitaensis, J-6, 440–460 m; 12. Pseudohastigerina micra, J-2, 600–620 m. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 74/140 Plate 6 Figs. 1–12, Oligocene; scale bar 100 μm, except Figs. 1, 5, 10–50 μm. 1. Cassigeriella chipolensis, J-5, 190–200 m; 2. Dentoglobigerina tripartita, J-6, 400–420 m; 3. Dentoglobigerina tapuriensis, J-6, 400–420; 4. Turborotalia ampliapertura, J-6, 360–380 m; 5. Pseudohastigerina naguewichiensis, J-5, 220–230 m; 6. Globigerina officinalis; J-1, 240–250 m; 7. Chiloguembelina ototara, J-6, 400–420 m; 8. Chiloguembelina cubensis, J-6, 360–380 m; 9. Chiloguembelina adriatica, J-6, 360–380 m; 10. Ciperoella anguliofficinalis, J-5, 160–170 m; 11. Ciperoella angulisu­ turalis, J-4, 455–475 m; 12. Ciperoella ciperoensis, J-4, 455–475 m.