2024 | 77/1 | 1–14 | 13 Figs. | www.geologia-croatica.hr Journal of the Croatian Geological Survey and the Croatian Geological Society 1. INTRODUCTION As one of the most important orogenic events of the late Palaeo- zoic, the Variscan orogeny had a major influence on the sedimen- tation and structural configuration of the various tectonostrati- graphic units and terranes in the present-day Circum-Pannonian Region. The spatial occurrence of terranes as fault-bounded crus- tal units comprising rock sequences of regional extent with dis- tinctive geological history (CONEY et al., 1980) does not neces- sarily reflect their relative position prior to their assembly (CHETTY, 2017). In this respect, the Adria-Dinaria Megaterrane, as one of the megaterranes in the Circum-Pannonian region, be- longed to the passive margin of Gondwana and has moved north- wards from the late Carboniferous to the present day (KARA- MATA, 2006; VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). This megaterrane com prises pre-Mesozoic sequences deposited on the passive mar- gin of Gondwana (e.g., RAMOVŠ et al., 1990) and Mesozoic car- bonates formed on the Adriatic Carbonate Platform (VLAHOVIĆ et al., 2005), which were later subjected to compression, rotation and transcurrent displacement during the Alpine orogeny ( KARAMATA, 2006). The Adria-Dinaria stratigraphic sequen- ces are best exposed in the Dinarides and in the Southern Alps (VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). Upper Palaeozoic rocks in the External Dinarides of south- ern Croatia are best exposed in the area of Lika and Velebit Mt. (Fig. 1; SREMAC & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1982 and refere- nces therein). The core of the Velebit Mt. anticline comprises a Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment Iva Palatinuš1,2, Katarina Gobo*,1, Karmen Fio Firi1, Frane Marković1 and Jasenka Sremac1 1 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Geology, Horvatovac 102b, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (*corresponding author: katarina.gobo@geol.pmf.unizg.hr) 2 Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Mineral Resources, Sachsova 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia doi: 10.4154/gc.2024.02 Abstract The multicoloured ‘Košna’ conglomerates are investigated in the area of the Košna Voda spring, in the Brušane area of Velebit Mt., Croatia. The studied conglomerates consist of red-coloured matrix and clasts of various lithologies (sandstones, limestones, chert and quartz pebbles) and sizes, suggesting provenance from different areas. Average clast size and their percentage was determined by the Udden-Wentworth classification with estimation of the matrix content. Clasts and matrix lithological and mineralogical characteristics were determined using petrographic, ore microscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis. Sandstone clasts in the studied conglomerates are classified as lithic arenites, subarkoses and arkoses. Limestone clasts are mostly wackestones to packstones with foraminifera, ostracods, echinoid and bryozoan fragments that derive from late Carboniferous/early Permian shallow-marine limestones. Calcispheres and incipient growth forms of Microcodium are also present, suggesting different sediment sources and resedimen- tation processes. Fragments of fusulinid foraminifera were identified in the matrix of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. Based on the analyses performed, and field observations, the ‘Košna’ conglom- erates are described as early Permian (Cisuralian) polymictic clast-supported to matrix-support- ed conglomerates and breccia-conglomerates that share structural and textural similarities with conglomerates from other areas in the Dinarides, as well as in the Eastern and Southern Alps. The ‘Košna’ conglomerates are younger than the Sakmarian and are comparable with the Trog- kofel limestones of the Carnic Alps and the Karavanke Mts. in Slovenia. We suggest that the studied deposits originated from the uplifted Variscan Mountains during the Variscan and Saa- lian orogenic movements, and were finally deposited from tractive flows and occasional debris flows in a shallow marine environment of the Palaeo-Tethys, possibly in fan deltas. succession of clastic and carbonate deposits. These deposits range in age from the Pennsylvanian (Moscovian) until the end of Per- mian/beginning of the Triassic, with an unconformable or tec- tonic contact separating Carboniferous from Permian deposits (KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973; ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997). They were deposited on the Palaeotethyan shelf area along the northern passive continental margin of Gondwana (RAMOVŠ et al., 1990; SREMAC, 2005). Geological studies of the Palaeozoic deposits in the area of Lika and Velebit Mt. were initiated by FOETTERLE (1855), HAUER (1868), SCHUBERT (1908, 1910) and KOCH (1909a,b, 1914, 1929a,b), with further research by SALOPEK (1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1948, 1952). Stratigraphic subdivision of the Permian deposits based on microfossils was presented by KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ (1955, 1959, 1965, 1973). Petrological description of the Upper Palaeozoic deposits of the Lika and Vele- bit Mt. area, as well as their tectonic evolution, was provided by RAFFAELLI and ŠĆAVNIČAR (1968). Biostratigraphic deter- minations, depositional environments and climatic conditions during deposition of the Palaeozoic deposits in the Velebit Mt. area are presented in papers by TIŠLJAR et al. (1991) and SREMAC (1991, 2005, 2007, 2012). Recent papers by WERNER et al. (2015) and SUDAR et al. (2016) focused on remagnetization phenomena of the lower Permian clastics and the composition and provenance of middle Permian sandstones respectively, in the study area. Previous research was less focused on the age and deposi- tional environment of clastic deposits, especially the ‘Košna’ con- Article history: Manuscript recieved: July 18, 2023 Revised manuscript accepted: December 14, 2023 Available online: February 27, 2024 Keywords: polymictic conglomerates, Brušane area, Velebit Mt., Variscan orogeny, Cisuralian G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/12 glomerates, which have been assigned to the Middle Permian by SALOPEK (1942) or early Permian by KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ (1973). These conglomerates form part of a 750 m thick succes- sion known as the ‘Košna Beds’ which were named after the Košna Voda spring in the Brušane area of Velebit Mt. (SALO- PEK, 1942). The Košna Beds consist of breccia or green pyritic sandstones in the basal part, and are overlain by quartz conglom- erates, ‘Košna’ conglomerates with limestone and clastic pebbles, and red to yellow ‘Košna’ sandstones (SALOPEK, 1942, 1948; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973). The ‘Košna Beds’ are conside red as an equivalent of the Trogkofel beds in Slovenia (KOCHANSKY- - DEVIDÉ, 1973) and were petrologically studied by RAFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR (1968), who determined that the occurrence of lithic greywackes and texturally immature sediment was indica- tive of orogenic movements. Upper Palaeozoic clastic successions in the area of the South- ern Alps were extensively studied and interpreted in terms of depositional environment, stratigraphy and origin (RAMOVŠ & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1965; RAMOVŠ, 1968; KRAINER, 1990, 1993, 2005; CASSINIS et al., 2008; VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009; SCHAFFHAUSER et al., 2015). In contrast, the upper Pa- laeozoic clastic deposits in the area of Lika and Gorski Kotar in Croatia have been studied in detail only in terms of their litho- logical composition (ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997), whilst their origin and depositional environment are still not fully un- derstood. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to determine the age, origin, climatic conditions during weathering and the deposi- tional environment of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates based on the data obtained by field research and qualitative and quantitative analyses. Due to the similar tectono-sedimentary development of the late Palaeozoic successions in the Adria-Dinaria Megaterrane (VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009), the ‘Košna’ conglomerates will be compared with similar deposits in Croatia, Slovenia, and the Eastern and Southern Alps. 2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDIED AREA The research area is situated in the central part of the Velebit Mountain, northwest of Brušane village (Lika–Senj County), in the vicinity of the Košna Voda spring (Fig. 1). The oldest deposits here are upper Carboniferous shales, sandstones and conglomerates, with limestone lenses occurring in the uppermost part of this clastic succession (SALOPEK, 1942; SOKAČ et al., 1976; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1979). This upper Carboniferous succession is considered to be an equivalent of the Auernig Beds (SALOPEK, 1942; SOKAČ et al., 1976; KOCHAN- SKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973). The end of the Carboniferous and the be- ginning of the Permian are characterized by Rattendorf lime- stones with Schwagerina and Pseudoschwagerina fossils (SREMAC & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1982; CLEAL et al., 2015). The contact between the Auernig Group and the Ratten- dorf limestones is marked by the occurrence of lithic greywackes and coarse-grained terrigenous clasts, indicating orogenic move- ments that caused infilling of the sedimentary basin with coarse and immature sediment (RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR, 1968; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973). The ‘Košna’ conglomerates in the studied area are locally in either a transgressive contact with the underlying Carboniferous deposits, or intercalated with Per- mian clastics (SALOPEK, 1942; SOKAČ et al., 1976). The Per- mian deposits in the area of Brušane – Baške Oštarije can gene- rally be subdivided into the lower, clastic zone (including the ‘Košna’ conglomerates) and the upper, dolomite zone, with three limestone intervals (SREMAC & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1982). The change in the lithological composition is the result of significant orogenic activity associated with the late stages of the Variscan orogeny in the Middle Permian and at the beginning of the late Permian (SALOPEK, 1942, 1948; RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR, 1968; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973). 3. METHODS This research included detailed field investigations in the area of the Košna Voda spring in the Jažine trench (Fig. 1), where con- glomerates occur as scattered and discontinuous outcrops. A to- tal of 19 rock samples, which included limestone, chert and sand- stone clasts, as well as Košna conglomerate fragments of different size and composition, were randomly selected, sampled and marked with the letter „K“ and numbers 1 to 19. Five well ex- posed layers were photographed within 60 x 40 cm frames in or- der to measure the longest (x) and shortest (z) visible clast axes (Fig. 2), determine average clast size and categorize them accord- ing to the Udden-Wentworth scale for statistical processing of granulometric data. The matrix percentage was estimated ac- cording to TERRY & CHILINGAR (1955). Figure 1. Location and geological map of the studied area (modified after SALOPEK, 1942, 1948). G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 3 Petrological analyses of conglomerate clasts and matrix were undertaken at the Department of Geology of the Faculty of Sci- ence, University of Zagreb. From the 19 samples, 23 thin-sections were prepared according to the method described in VRKLJAN et al. (2018). Out of these, 17 were thin-sections of sandstones, five of limestones and one of chert. Thin-sections were analyzed using a petrographic polarizing microscope and an ore micro- scope. From 17 thin-sections and six polished sections of sand- stones, representative samples were analyzed using the line counting method, and classified according to PETTIJOHN et al. (1987). Six selected thin-sections of sandstones were stained us- ing a mixture of Alizarin red S and potassium ferricyanide dis- solved in a dilute hydrochloric acid solution in order to differen- tiate the carbonate minerals (DICKSON, 1966; EVAMY, 1969). Identified minerals and lithic fragments in photomicrographs, photographed with and without crossed polars, are annotated with abbreviations according to WHITNEY & EVANS (2010) and SWANSON (1981). To determine the possible provenance of the clastic material, a ternary provenance diagram (modified af- ter DICKINSON et al., 1983) was used together with the weath- ering index diagram (after WELTJE, 1994; WELTJE et al., 1998), to determine the relief, weathering conditions and origin of the clastic material. Micropalaeontological analyses were conducted on five limestone samples and classified according to FOLK (1959) and DUNHAM (1962). X-ray powder diffraction analysis was performed on the conglomerate matrix to determine its mineralogical composition and relate it to the specific red colouration. The matrix was ex- tracted from two conglomerate samples and analyzed in a Philips X’Pert Pro diffractometer. The samples were continuously scanned (0,001° 2Θ/s) with the generator set to 40 mA and 40 kV, using a copper anode. Diffractograms were interpreted us- ing the X’Pert Highscore Plus program and the PDF-2 database (ICDD 2004). 4. RESULTS 4.1. Fieldwork The studied conglomerates crop out as an approximately 2 km wide lens-shaped body, reach a maximum thickness of about 100 m and are fragmented and scattered along the Košna Voda creek (Fig. 3A). They comprise pebble- and cobble-sized clasts of vari- ous lithological composition: red, grey and green pyritic sand- stones, chert, limestone and quartz. The matrix is composed of mostly red, coarse sand-sized particles. The conglomerates are predominantly clast-supported, massive and poorly sorted, with rounded to subrounded clasts of low sphericity. Pebble imbrica- tion is also common, as well as intervals exhibiting normal grad- ing and crude plane-parallel stratification (Fig. 3B). Subordinate matrix-supported conglomerates contain clasts of different sphe- ricity and roundness. In several places, angular clasts prevail and these deposits can be classified as breccia-conglomerates. Else- where, conglomerates intercalate with horizontally laminated sandstones (Fig. 3C). 4.2. Quantitative analysis From photographs of five selected 60 by 40 cm frames placed on the outcrop (Fig. 2), the length of clast x- and z-axes were meas- ured, for a total of 609 clasts. The length of the longest axis (x) ranges from 0.7 to 10.5 cm with an average of 2.7 cm, while the length of the shortest axis (z) ranges from 0.4 to 7.3 cm with an average of 1.5 cm. Based on the measured diameters, using the Udden-Wentworth grain size classification, clasts are divided into two categories: pebbles (4–64 mm) and cobbles (64–256 mm). The pebbles dominate with 96.40 % (Fig. 4A) and are further di- vided into three subcategories (Fig. 4B): medium (8–16 mm), coarse (16–32 mm) and very coarse (32–64 mm). Most pebbles are very coarse (54 %), whereas subordinate medium and coarse pebbles are equally represented. The amount of matrix varies from 5 % in clast-supported conglomerates to up to 80 % in ma- trix-supported conglomerates. 4.3. Petrology of sandstones, provenance and weathering index diagram Sandstone clasts, determined in 17 out of 23 thin-sections, are lithic arenites, subarkoses and arkoses, with their characteristics described and explained below. 4.3.1. Lithic arenites Lithic arenites (Fig. 5A to H) are poorly to well-sorted with sub- angular to sub-rounded grey, yellowish and brownish grains in Figure 2. Example of the 60 by 40 cm frame used to measure x and z clast axes. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/14 a dark to reddish matrix (Fig. 5B, D, F) that contains silt-sized brownish to grey particles about 60 μm in size. The rest of the bounding material is cement, composed of ferruginous dolomite. Quartz grains are most common (48–53.5 %; Fig. 5A–F), often interspersed with calcite veins. Lithic fragments make up about 25.7–30 % of the samples, while feldspar grains are present at about 21 % (Fig. 5A, B). Among the lithic fragments, chert is the most common type (Fig. 5A–D), whereas limestone clasts, low- metamorphic rock fragments and unidentifiable fine-grained reddish rock fragments are less common. Besides the main rock- forming minerals, elongated mica grains are also present, as well as small amounts of idiomorphic opaque minerals showing cubic symmetry (Fig. 5G, H). To identify the opaque minerals, two polished sections were made. In reflected light, the colour of these minerals is brassy yellow with a metallic lustre, which is, along with the habitus, characteristic for pyrite (Fig. 5G, H). The X-ray powder diffraction analysis showed the presence of quartz, haematite, muscovite and calcite in sample K-1 (Fig. 6A), whereas sample K-6 additionally shows the presence of clino- chlore and feldspar (Fig. 6B). 4.3.2. Subarkoses Samples of subarkoses (Fig. 7A to F) are moderately- to well- sorted and contain angular to subangular grains. Composition- ally, quartz grains prevail (up to 66 %), while feldspars and lithic fragments make up to 22.4 % and 16.8 % of the samples, respec- tively. The cement is composed of ferruginous dolomite. Lithic fragments comprise chert, limestones, metamorphic rock clasts and microbreccia fragments (Fig. 7A, C). Mica and opaque min- eral grains are rare. Chlorite minerals occupy up to 5 % of the samples. Chlorite grains are green and anhedral with an average size of 120 μm (Fig. 7E). The interference colour is lavender-blue to purple (Fig. 7F), which is characteristic for chlorite minerals rich in iron. 4.3.3. Arkose One sample is classified as a moderately sorted arkose (Fig. 8), with 62.2 % of quartz, 29.5 % of feldspar and 8% of lithic frag- ments – mostly limestone, rare chert and small amounts of pla- gioclase and mica (Fig. 8A, B). Cement is present in small amounts and is composed of ferruginous dolomite. 4.3.4. Provenance diagram and weathering index diagram The ternary provenance diagram by DICKINSON et al. (1983) shows that samples of lithic arenites (K-1, K-6 and K-11) and sub- arkoses (K-4 and K-12) are all plotted in the area of recycled oro- gen, while the arkose sample (K-13) plots at the borderline of two areas: recycled orogen and continental block (Fig. 9). Figure 3. The sedimentary features of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. A: Outcrop in the vicinity of the Košna Voda spring, with visible massive matrix-supported con- glomerates. Person is 1.70 m tall. B: Close-up photo showing a clast-supported conglomerate with normal grading and crude plane-parallel stratification. Hammer is 30 cm long. C: Horizontally laminated sandstone. Coin for scale is 24.5 mm in diameter. Figure 4. Results of statistical analyses obtained from gravel clast axes measurements of 609 clasts from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. A: Pie chart showing the domi- nance of pebble-sized clasts. B: Pie chart showing the relative proportions of the various pebble categories. G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 5 The weathering index diagram (WELTJE, 1994; WELTJE et al., 1998) consists of two areas indicating the origin of the weathered material (metamorphic/sedimentary or plutonic). These areas are divided into four fields, each indicating relief and climate conditions. The natural logarithm of quartz to lithic fragments ratio and the natural logarithm of quartz to feldspar ratio are plotted on the abscissa and ordinate, respectively. Ana- lyzed samples plotted in the plutonic area of the diagram, with Figure 5. Photomicrographs of lithic arenites from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates, left under polarized light and right with crossed nicols. Legend: Cht – chert, Qz – quartz, Fsp – feldspar, Mtrx – matrix. A, B: sample K-1. C, D: sample K-6. E, F: Sample K-11, with opaque mineral in the centre. G, H: Close-up of the opaque mineral (most likely pyrite) in sample K-11. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/16 lithic arenites in the area “0” and subarkoses and arkose in the area “1” (Fig. 10). 4.4. Chert petrology Sample K-5 is a microcrystalline chert with quartz veins (Fig. 11A, B). It contains idiomorphic opaque mineral grains with thin, light-transmitting edges, making their own reddish-brown colour visible. These grains are determined as haematite (Fig. 11C, D). Additionally, polished sections revealed anhedral grains with a brassy-yellow colour in reflected light and a metallic lustre, which are determined as pyrite (Fig. 11E). 4.5. Limestone petrology and microfossil analysis Limestone clasts within the ‘Košna’ conglomerates occur mainly as cobbles. Thin-sections from five selected cobbles show that limestones are mostly composed of poorly preserved skeletal fragments and micrite. They are classified as biomicrites (FOLK, 1959). According to DUNHAM (1962), sample K-14 is classified as wackestone (Fig. 12A), samples K-15, K-16 and K-17 as pack- stones (Fig. 12B), and sample K-18 as wackestone to packstone with sparite-filled cavities. Fossil content from the analyzed limestones includes ostra- cods, calcispheres (Fig. 12C), possible radiolarians, echinoid spines, foraminifera, and bryozoans (Fig. 12D). Isodiametric poly hedral elements (crystals/grains), arranged around a hollow central part occur locally and in size and structure, resemble incipient growth forms of Microcodium (Fig. 12E–F), i.e. organ- isms of uncertain systematic position. The features, however, do not show radially elongated calcite grains characteristic of classic Microcodium “corncob” and “rosette” morphologies. Deter- mined foraminifera species include: Diplosphaerina (previously: Neotuberitina) maljavkini SULEYMANOV, 1948 (Fig. 12G); Tu- Figure 6. X-ray diffractograms of matrix samples from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. Sample K-1 (above) and K-6 (below). Legend: Cal – calcite, Clc – clinochlore, Fsp – feldspar, Hem – hematite, Ms – muscovite, Qz – quartz. G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 7 Figure 7. Photomicrographs of subarkose sample K-4 from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates, left under polarized light and right with crossed nicols. Legend: Cht – chert, Qz – quartz, Chl – chlorite, Pl – plagioclase, Or – orthoclase. A, B: fine-grained subarkose. C, D: microbreccia fragment surrounded by finer grains. E, F: Chlorite minerals. Figure 8. Photomicrographs of arkose sample K-13 from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. Legend: Cal – calcite, Ms – muscovite, Pl – plagioclase. A: under polarized light and B: with crossed nicols. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/18 Figure 9. Ternary provenance diagram modified after DICKINSON et al. (1983). Figure 10. The weathering index diagram modified after WELTJE (1994) and WELTJE et al. (1998). G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 9 beritina bulbacea GALLOWAY & HARLTON, 1948 (Fig. 12H) and Turrispiroides cf. microsphaerica K.V. MIKLUKHO-MAK- LAY, 1968 (Fig. 12I). It should be noted that fusulinid foramini- feral fragments are observed in limestones, but also within the sandstone matrix (Fig. 12J), together with some unidentified fossil material (Fig. 12K). 5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Sediment source and depositional environment of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates The studied deposits in the Košna Voda spring area include mainly massive, poorly sorted clast-supported conglomerates with very large pebbles (32–64 mm), less common matrix-sup- ported conglomerates and rare breccia-conglomerates. The con- stituent gravel clasts are by composition sandstones (lithic aren- ites, subarkoses and arkoses), limestones and cherts. The variations in their shape and size result from their different pet- rological compositions, as well as from transport and weathering conditions prior to their inclusion into the conglomerates. The matrix is composed of coarse-grained sand particles coloured by haematite. The ternary provenance diagram (DICKINSON et al., 1983) shows that the analyzed sandstone clasts mostly originated from a recycled orogen and a continental block (Fig. 9) and were most likely formed by weathering of a high to moderate relief in a (semi)-arid to partially humid climate, as suggested by the weathe- ring index diagram (Fig. 10). The sedimentary textures and struc- tures observed in the conglomerates (plane-parallel stratification, imbrication and normal grading) are common in sediments deposited by tractive flows in alluvial systems and deltas, as well as from coarse-grained turbidity currents (TIŠLJAR, 1994). Structureless matrix-supported and clast-supported conglo- merates may have been deposited from cohesive and cohesionless subaqueous debris flows, respectively (DRAKE, 1990; MULDER & ALEXANDER, 2001). Fragments of fusulinid foraminifera found within the conglomerate matrix suggest deposition in a marine environment. Although not found in the studied samples, the occurrence of chlorite minerals, illite and sericite, as well as pyrite in the conglomerate matrix was reported by RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR (1968), and is considered as another indication of sedimentation in a marine setting. These results reveal that the sediment constituting the ‘Košna’ conglomerates originated from the erosion of the mountains uplifted during the late phases of the Variscan orogeny and that they were deposited in shallow marine areas, as firstly suggested by RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR (1968). Due to limited outcrop exposure, the precise type of depositional environment is difficult to interpret with certainty, but it is suggested that these shallow-marine conglomerates represent gravelly mouth bars or uppermost slope of fan-deltaic or deltaic systems, sourced either by alluvial fans or braided fluvial systems, respectively (NEMEC & STEEL, 1984). The limestones – from which the analyzed limestone clasts were derived – most likely formed in a low-energy marine envi- ronment, as suggested by the large amount of micrite and presence of ostracods, echinoids and bryozoa (Fig. 12A to D). Determined calcispheres (Fig. 12C) are indicative of deep marine environment; however, in the studied samples they are often found in associa- tion with ostracod fragments, suggesting resedimentation pro- cesses. The incipient growth forms of Microcodium represent a biologically-induced mineralization driven by a saprotrophic mi- croorganism or a microbial association, which is common from the Moscovian to the early Permian, and appears in calcretes and calcareous palaeosols (ESTEBAN, 1972; KOŠIR, 2004; KA- BANOV et al., 2008). Such types of palaeosols form in subtropi- cal and tropical climatic conditions, with occasional dry periods and well-drained semi-arid soils (KABANOV et al., 2008). These Figure 11. Chert sample K-5. A, B: Photomicrographs under polarized light (A) and under crossed nicols (B). C: Opaque mineral grains under polarized light and (D) under crossed nicols. E: Pyrite grain in polished section under reflected light. G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/110 observations suggest that limestone clasts in the ‘Košna’ conglom- erates derive from paralic, shallow and deep marine environ- ments, indicating severe tectonic movements (cf. REIJMER et al., 2015). Taking into account the results of the weathering index diagram obtained from the sandstone clasts (Fig. 10; WELTJE, 1994; WELTJE et al., 1998), it transpires that the passive margin of Gondwana was subjected to an overall semi-arid to partially humid climate, which affected the weathering of both carbonate and clastic successions that sourced the diverse gravel clasts found in the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. Similar climatic conditions contin- ued during the middle Permian, as suggested by the composition and provenance of middle Permian sandstones in the nearby Pikovac Creek valley (Fig. 1; SUDAR et al., 2016). 5.2. Age of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates Limestone clasts from the conglomerates near the Košna Voda spring comprise microfossils of late Carboniferous (Gzhelian) to the early Permian (Asselian, Sakmarian) age, suggesting that the conglomerates are younger than the Sakmarian (Fig. 13). Gzhelian to Sakmarian rocks are not exposed in the vicinity of the Košna Voda spring, but microfossils found in the limestone clasts of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates are known from the neigh- bouring regions: e.g. Tuberitina bulbacea GALLOWAY & HARLTON, 1928 occurs in the Kasimovian−Gzhelian deposits of the Banovina region (MILANOVIĆ, 1982), early Kasimovian limestones (Auernig Group) of the Carnic Alps in Italy (URL3, Figure 12. Photomicrographs of limestone and sandstone samples from the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. A: Wackestone, sample K-14; B: Packstone with various fossil fragments, sample K-16; C: Wackestone with ostracods and calcispheres; D: Wackestone to packstone with bryozoan fragment; E–F: Wackestone to packstone with Microcodium sp.; G: Wackestone with Diplosphaerina (previously: Neotuberitina) maljavkini (SULEYMANOV, 1948); H: Tuberitina bulbacea GALLOWAY & HARLTON, 1948 surrounded by microsparite; I: Wackestone to packstone with Turrispiroides cf. microsphaerica K.V. MIKLUKHO-MAKLAY, 1968; J: Fragment of fusulinid foraminifera in the sandstone matrix; K: Unidentified fossil fragment in the sandstone matrix. G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 11 URL4), but also in Neoschwagerina Beds of Roadian age in Slo- venia (URL5). The foraminifera Turrispiroides cf. microspha- erica K.V. MIKLUKHO-MAKLAY was not determined in the neighbouring regions, but was reported from the Pennsylvanian to lower Permian deposits of Iran (YARAHMADZAH & VACHARD, 2019). Limestones discovered at Jajara Hill near Medak (today sit- uated ca. 15 km ESE from the Košna Voda spring), can help in determining the age of the ‘Košna’ Beds. These limestones over- lie ~100 m thick shales and are overlain by ~300 m thick yellow ‘Košna’ sandstones (KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973), which rep- resent the uppermost part of the ‘Košna’ Beds (RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR, 1968). The limestones comprise fusulinid taxa Darvasites (Alpites) ex gr. contractus (Schellwien) and Pseudo- fusulina cf. rakoveci Ramovš & Kochansky-Devidé, together with Diplosphaerina (previously: Neotuberitina) maljavkini ( SULEYMANOV, 1948). According to these fossil findings, KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ (1973) suggested that the ‘Košna’ Beds are contemporaneous with the Trogkofel limestones in Slovenia (Karavanke, Ortnek) and the Carnic Alps, which have been as- signed an Artinskian/Kungurian age (Fig. 13; SCHAFFSHAUSER et al., 2015). 5.3. Comparison with similar formations in the neighbouring regions The Upper Palaeozoic deposits of the Eastern Alps, Southern Alps and Outer Dinarides result from similar tectono-sedimen- tary evolution and can therefore be compared. The conglomerates were deposited as a result of Variscan and Saalian orogenic move- ments mostly in alluvial fan environments in Eastern Lombardy and the Dolomites (KRAINER, 1989, 1993), whereas the con- glomerates in the Eastern and Southern Alps represent deposition in more distal settings, such as fluvial, lacustrine or deltaic envi- ronments (VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). The late- to post-Variscan sequence is divided into two tec- tono-sedimentary cycles, separated by a major unconformity caused by the Saalian orogenic movements (SCHÖNLAUB, 1982; KRAINER, 1993; CASSINIS et al., 2012), known also as the “Mid-Permian tectonic episode” (DEROIN & BONIN, 2003). Sediments of the lower cycle were deposited in alluvial and la- custrine settings with several volcanoclastic intervals, within in- tramontane strike-slip and pull-apart basins (e.g., CASSINIS & PEROTTI, 2007) from the late Carboniferous to the Permian (KRAINER, 1993; CASSINIS et al., 2013). Despite the major stratigraphic gap, the middle?/upper Permian to Lower Triassic sediments of the upper cycle conformably overlie the lower Per- mian sequence of the lower cycle (KRAINER, 1993). The contact between the deposits of the two cycles is in places unexposed, erosional or undetermined. The beginning of the upper cycle is characterized by the deposition of Val Daone conglomerates in the Lombardian Alps, which comprise conglomerates, microcon- glomerates and sandstones with fragments of quartz and various magmatic rocks, plant debris and coal lenses (Fig. 13; CASSINIS et al., 2008; GRETTER et al., 2013). The conglomerates are mul- ticoloured (white, greyish, reddish, greenish), show clast imbri- cation and fining-upwards cycles, and are overlain by the lami- nated Val Gardena sandstone (Grödner Sandstein) (Fig.13; CASSINIS et al., 2008; GRETTER et al., 2013). Such transition is attributed to a shift from alluvial fan to fluvial environments (GRETTER et al., 2013). These conglomerates were deposited at the margins of sedimentary basins along a slope break in re- sponse to an extensional tectonic regime (CASSINIS et al., 1995, 2012; GRETTER et al., 2013). Their age was first considered to be late Permian (CASSINIS et al., 1995, 2012), but was later re- vised to the middle Permian on the basis of palynological data (GRETTER et al., 2013). In general, the middle/late Permian was characterised by clastic sedimentation, followed by carbonate and/or evaporite sedimentation (Fig. 13). Figure 13. Upper Palaeozoic deposits in the area of the Southern and Eastern Alps, and Velebit Mt. (compiled and modified after KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ (1973), RAMOVŠ et al. (1990), KRAINER (1993), MAROCCHI et al. (2008) and CASSINIS et al. (2012)). G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/112 In the western part of the Southern Alps (Dolomites), the lower cycle is represented by the red and greenish-grey Ponte Gar- dena/Waidbruck conglomerate, overlain by the acidic Athesian Volcanic Group or District (Fig. 13; VISONÀ et al., 2007; MA- ROCCHI et al., 2008), previously named the Bolzano Volcanic complex (e.g., KRAINER, 1989, 2005; VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). This conglomerate represents alluvial-fan sediments deposited under semi-arid climatic conditions (KRAINER, 1989) and is in- terbedded with volcanic rocks related to the beginning of the Ath- esian volcanic activity during the middle Artinskian (VISONÀ et al., 2007). In the eastern part of the Southern Alps (the Sexten Dolomites), the lower Permian Sexten breccias and conglomera- tes occur as an equivalent of the Ponte Gardena conglomerate (Fig. 13; FLÜGEL & KRAUS, 1986; KRAINER, 1993 and refer- ences therein). The middle-upper Permian sediments of the upper cycle begin with the Tarvis breccia at the base, which is followed by the Grödner Sandstein (Val Gardena sandstone) and the Bel- lerophon Formation (Fig. 13; KRAINER, 1993; VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). The Sexten breccias and conglomerates and the Tarvis breccia are interpreted to represent deposition from debris flows and stream-channel flows in alluvial fan environments (FLÜGEL & KRAUS, 1986) and are considered as equivalents of the Val Daone conglomerates even though these basal bodies of the sec- ond Permian cycle could not necessarily be assessed as quite syn- chronous (Fig. 13; CASSINIS et al., 2008). In the Carnic Alps and the Karavanke Mountains, shallow marine clastic and carbonate depositional environments prevailed through most of the Permian (KRAINER, 2005; SHAFFAUSER et al., 2015). The lower Permian lower tectono-sedimentary cycle in this area is represented by the Rattendorf and Trogkofel Groups consisting primarily of limestones (Fig. 13; KRAINER, 1993). In the southern Karavanke Mountains, the Trogkofel Group is represented mostly by clastic deposits intercalated with thin beds of conodont-rich dark limestones (RAMOVŠ, 1963, 1968; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973). This clastic sequence also in- cludes olistoliths composed of Trogkofel limestone and is consid- ered to represent a deep-marine depositional environment (KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973; KRAINER, 1993). The Mid- Permian hiatus separates the Trogkofel Group from the overlying upper cycle which includes the non-marine Tarvis breccia, the Gröden formation and the Bellerophon formation (Fig. 13; KRAINER, 1993). The Tarvis breccia consists mostly of Trog- kofel limestone fragments and subordinate fragments of quartz, magmatic rocks, sandstones, chert and phyllite surrounded by a red to grey clayey matrix (KRAINER, 1993). This breccia is in- terpreted as a scarpfoot fan deposit and proximal debris flow, possibly deposited in an arid environment or coastal sabkha based on the occurrence of calcareous concretions (FLÜGEL & KRAUS, 1986; KRAINER, 1993). The sedimentary features and occurrence of large Trogkofel limestone clasts in the Tarvis brec- cia renders it rather similar to the ‘Košna’ conglomerates. Clastic deposition in the vicinity of Ortnek in Slovenia is at- tributed to the early to middle Permian, with the lower part con- sisting of grey to occasionally red quartz conglomerates and quartz sandstones deposited in a shallow marine environment (RAMOVŠ & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1965; RAMOVŠ, 1968). Plant remains and coal intercalations in these deposits suggest their depositional proximity to a vegetated hinterland (RAMOVŠ, 1968). The upper part of the Upper Palaeozoic succession in Slo- venia comprises grey shales alternating with organic-rich quartz sandstones (RAMOVŠ, 1968). Limestone lenses, limestone brec- cias and breccia-conglomerates occur within the shales and are interpreted as small reefs and associated talus produced by reef erosion (RAMOVŠ & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1965; RAMOVŠ, 1968). This Palaeozoic succession corresponds to the clastic Trogkofel beds (ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997 and ref- erences therein). In the Gorski Kotar area of Croatia, the Palaeozoic complex of predominantly clastic deposits comprises Carboniferous Tritic- ites sandstones overlain by Permian sandstones, sandstone-shale intercalations, orthoquartzitic and petromictic conglomerates (SALOPEK, 1949a, b, 1960; RAFFAELLI & ŠĆAVNIČAR, 1968; KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, 1973; ALJINOVIĆ, 1997; ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997; VOZÁROVÁ et al., 2009). These Permian clastic rocks have an uncertain stratigraphic position in different areas of Gorski Kotar, and have been the subject of many debates (see references in ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997; ALJINOVIĆ et al., 2003). Where present, fossiliferous limestone intercalations suggest an early to middle Permian age. SALOPEK (1960) de- scribed the aforementioned petromictic conglomerates with clasts of fossiliferous limestones as Gröden-type deposits, attributing them a middle Permian age. However, these findings have later been erroneously cited (see review by ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997), which led to the misconception that upper Permian Gröden clastics exist in the area of Gorski Kotar. Nonetheless, sandstone intercalations within this lower–middle Permian clastic series are commonly rich in plant detritus, suggesting their depositional proximity to an uplifted hinterland (ALJINOVIĆ et al., 2003). De- spite the debate regarding the stratigraphic attribution, most re- searchers concur with the notion that this clastic series was most likely deposited in a shallow marine environment, most likely fan deltas that developed in response to early to middle Permian tec- tonic activity (GRUBIĆ, 1980; ALJINOVIĆ, 1997; ALJINOVIĆ & SREMAC, 1997; ALJINOVIĆ et al., 2003). Based on the described tectono-stratigraphic development within the Adria-Dinaria Megaterrane, it is evident that the ‘Košna’ conglomerates are comparable with similar lithological units in the neighbouring regions and may be considered as lat- eral equivalents of the Val Daone conglomerates and the Tarvis breccia in the Alps. Their sedimentological features suggest dep- osition from coarse-grained tractive flows and occasional debris flows, most likely on mouth bars or the subaqueous slopes of a fan delta or river delta (NEMEC & STEEL, 1984). 6. CONCLUSIONS 1. The ‘Košna’ conglomerates from the Brušane area of the Vele- bit Mt., Croatia are of lower Permian, most probably Artin- skian age, polymict, clast-supported and matrix supported conglomerates, in places breccia-conglomerates with domi- nantly red coarse-grained matrix, coloured by hae matite. 2. The sediment forming the ‘Košna’ conglomerates most likely originates from weathering of the Variscan Mountains in (semi)-arid and partly humid climatic conditions. 3. It is suggested that the material from the Variscan Mountains was reworked and transported by alluvial systems into marine settings where it was deposited most likely on the subaqueous slopes of a fan-delta or river delta. 4. Determined microfossils from the limestone clasts of the ‘Košna’ conglomerates are of late Carboniferous/early Permian age. The identified fauna resemble the biota of the Auernig and Rattendorf Groups. 5. The ‘Košna’ conglomerates show structural and textural similarities with Permian conglomerates from the Eastern and Southern Alps. Their deposition results from Variscan G eologia C roatica Palatinuš et al.: Lower Permian Košna conglomerates of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): modal composition, provenance and depositional environment 13 and Saalian orogenic movements that occurred in different areas at different times. Considering the similar tectono-sedi- mentary development of the present-day Southern Alps and the Dinarides during the Palaeozoic, the ‘Košna’ conglomer- ates can be considered as a lateral equivalent of the Val Daone conglomerates and/or the Tarvis breccia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This study was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation project IP-2019-04-7042, and the University of Zagreb, financial support 107-F20-00005. Thin-sections were prepared by Željko IŠTUK and Dejan VONČINA at the Faculty of Science, Univer- sity of Zagreb. Robert KOŠĆAL from the Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, helped in the preparation of the figures. Formal reviews by Ausonio RONCHI and an anonymous re- viewer are much appreciated for helping improve the manuscript. REFERENCES ALJINOVIĆ, D. (1997): Facijesi klastičnih sedimenata mlađega paleozoika i starijega trijasa Gorskoga kotara [Late Palaeozoic and Early Scythian clastic facies – in Croatian].– Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Zagreb, 163 p. ALJINOVIĆ, D. & SREMAC, J. (1997): The Middle and Upper Permian Deposits in Gorski Kotar: Facts and Misconceptions.– Geologia Croatica, 50/2, 231–242. ALJINOVIĆ, D., SREMAC, J. & IBRAHIMPAŠIĆ, H. (2003): Permian and Lower Tri- assic Facies of Velebit Mt. and the Gorski Kotar Region (NW Part of External Di- narides).– In: VLAHOVIĆ, I. & TIŠLJAR, J. (eds.): Field Trip Guidebook, 22nd IAS Meeting of Sedimentology – Opatija 2003, Institute of Geology – Zagreb, 183–206. CASSINIS, G., TOUTIN-MORIN, N. & VIRGILI, C. (1995): A General Outline of the Permian Continental Basins in Southwestern Europe.– In: SCHOLLE, P.A., PERYT, T.M. & ULMER-SCHOLLE, D.S. (eds.): The Permian of Northern Pan- gea, Volume 2: Sedimentary Basins and Economic Resources, Springer, Berlin, 137–157. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78590-0_8 CASSINIS, G. & PEROTTI, C.R. (2007): A stratigraphic and tectonic review of the Ital- ian Southern Alpine Permian.– Palaeoworld, 16/1–3, 140–172. doi: 10.1016/j.pal- wor.2007.05.004 CASSINIS, G., RONCHI, A., GRETTER, N. & DURAND, M. (2008): The Val Daone Conglomerate: a Middle Permian key unit from the Central Southern Alps (western Trentino, Italy), and regional stratigraphic imlications.– Bollettino della Società geologica italiana (Italian Journal of Geosciences), 127/3, 519–532. CASSINIS, G., PEROTTI, C.R. & RONCHI, A. (2012): Permian continental basins in the Southern Alps (Italy) and peri-Mediterranean correlations.– International Jour- nal of Earth Sciences, 101, 129–157. doi: 10.1007/s00531-011-0642-6 CASSINIS, G., PEROTTI, C.R. & RONCHI, A. (2013): Geological remarks on the Car- boniferous-Permian continental succession of Southwestern Europe.– New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 60, 57–63. CHETTY, T.R.K. (2017): Proterozoic Orogens of India. Chapter 1 – Orogens, Elsevier, 1–34. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804441-4.00001-8 CLEAL, C.J., TENCHOV, Y.G., SREMAC, J., ĐEREK, T. & JAPUNDŽIĆ, S. (2015): Pennsylvanian fossil flora from the Velebit Mountains and Lika region (SW Croa- tia).– Bulletin of Geosciences, 90/3, 721–742. doi: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1529 CONEY, P.J., JONES, D.L. & MONGER, J.W.H. (1980): Cordilleran suspect terranes.– Nature, 288, 329–333. doi: 10.1038/288329a0 DEROIN, J.P. & BONIN, B. (2003): Late Variscan tectonomagmatic activity in Western Europe and surrounding areas: The Mid-Permian Episode.– Boll. Soc. Geol. It. (Volume Speciale), 2, 169–184. DICKINSON, W.R., BEARD, L.S., BRAKENRIDGE, G.R. & ERJAVEC, J. (1983): Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in relation to tectonic set- ting.– Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94, 222–235. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94%3C222:PONAPS%3E2.0.CO;2 DICKSON, J.A.D. (1966): Carbonate identification and genesis as revealed by staining.– Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 36/2, 491–505. DRAKE, T.G. (1990): Structural features in granular flows.– Journal of Geophysical Re- search: Solid Earth, 95/B6, 8681–8696. doi: 10.1029/JB095iB06p08681 DUNHAM, R.J. (1962): Classification of Carbonate Rocks According to Depositional Texture.– In: HAM, W.E. (ed.): Classification of Carbonate Rocks, AAPG, Tulsa, 08–121. ESTEBAN, M. (1972): Una nueva forma de Microcodium elegans Glueck 1912 y su relación con el caliche del Eoceno Inferior, Marmella, provincial de Tarragona (Es- paña).– Instituto de Investigaciones Geologicas, Universidad de Barcelona, Revis- ta, 27, 65–81. EVAMY, B.D. (1969): The precipitational environment and correlation of some calcite cements deducted from artificial staining.– Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 39/2, 787–821. FLÜGEL, E. & KRAUS, S. (1986): The lower Permian Sexten Breccia (Sexten Dolo- mites) and the Tarvis Breccia (Carnic Alps): microfacies, depositional environment and paleotectonic implications.– Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana, 34, 67–90. FOETTERLE, F. (1855): Bericht über den geologischen Untersuchungen im Kroatischen Küstenlande.– Jahr. Geol. R. A., 6, 417 p. FOLK, R.L. (1959): Practical Petrographic Classification of Limestones.– AAPG Bulle- tin, 43, 1–38. GALLOWAY, J.J. & HARLTON, B.H. (1928): Some Pennsylvanian Foraminifera of Oklahoma with special reference to the genus Orobias.– Journal of Paleontology, 2, 338–357. GRETTER, N., RONCHI, A., LANGONE, A. & PEROTTI, C.R. (2013): The transition between two major Permian tectono-stratigraphic cycles in the central Southern Alps: results from facies analysis and U/Pb geochronology.– International Journal of Earth Sciences, 102, 1181–1202. doi: 10.1007/s00531-013-0886-4 GRUBIĆ, A. (1980): Early Middle Permian break in the geotectonic evolution of Yugo- slav Dinarides.– In: Metalogenesis of Uranium, 26th Inter. Geol. Cong., Paris, Sect. 13.2.2., Geoinstitut, Beograd, 203–214. HAUER, F. (1868): Geologische Übersichtskarte der Österreichisch-Ungarische Monar- chie. Blatt X, Dalmatien.– Jarh. Geol. R. A., 18, 431–454. ICDD (2004): Powder diffraction file PDF-2, Release 2004, Newton Square. KABANOV, P., ANADÓN, P. & KRUMBEIN, W.E. (2008): Microcodium: An extensive review and a proposed non-rhizogenic biologically induces origin for its forma- tion.– Sedimentary Geology, 205, 79–99. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.02.003 KARAMATA, S. (2006): The geological development of the Balkan Peninsula related to the approach, collision and compression of Gondwanan and Eurasian units.– In: ROBERTSON, A.H.F. & MOUNTRAKIS, D. (eds.): Tectonic development of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Geological Society of London Special Publications, 260, 155–178. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.260.01.07 KOCH, F. (1909a): Geologijska prijegledna karta Kraljevine Hrvatske i Slavonije. Medak- Sv. Rok, 1:75 000.– Izdanje Kraljevske hrvatsko-slavonsko-dalmatinske zemaljske vlade Odjela za unutarnje poslove, Zagreb. KOCH, F. (1909b): Geologijska prijegledna karta Kraljevine Hrvatske i Slavonije. Tumač geologijske karte Medak-Sv. Rok, 1:75 000.– Naklada Kraljevske zemaljske vlade Odjela za unutarnje poslove, Izdanje. Geol. povj. 7, 1–31, Zagreb. KOCH, F. (1914): Izvještaj o geološkom snimanju Velebita i Like u godini 1913.– Vijes- ti geološkog povjerenstva, 3–4, 27–29. KOCH, F. (1929a): Geološka karta Hrvatske, Slavonije i Dalmacije (prilog geološkoj karti Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca). Karlobag-Jablanac.– Naklada Geol. zav. u Zagrebu, Repr. Vojnogeogr. Inst., Beograd. KOCH, F. (1929b): Tumač Geološkoj karti Karlobag-Jablanac. Prilog geologiji Velebita i Like.– Posebno izdanje Geol. zav. u Zagrebu, 1–42. KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1955): Karbonske i permske fuzulinidne foraminifere Vele- bita i Like. I. Opći dio i karbon.– Rad JAZU, 305, 5–62. KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1959): Karbonske i permske fuzulinidne foraminifere Vele- bita i Like. Donji perm.– Paleontologia jugoslavica, JAZU, 3, 62 p. KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1965): Karbonske i permske fuzulinidne foraminifere Vele- bita i Like. Srednji i gornji perm.– Acta geologica, JAZU, 5, 101–150. KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1973): Trogkofelske naslage u Hrvatskoj.– Geološki vjesnik, 26, 41–51. KOŠIR, A. (2004): Microcodium Revisited: Root Calcification Products of Terrestrial Plants on Carbonate-Rich Substrates.– Journal of Sedimentary Research, 74/6, 845– 857. doi: 10.1306/040404740845 KRAINER, K. (1989): Composition and evolution of Lower Periman molasse sediments (Ponte Gardena Conglomerate) at the base of the Bolzano Volcanic Complex, South- ern Alps (N Italy).– Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Monatshefte, 400–424. KRAINER, K. (1990): Fazielle und sedimentpetrographische Untesuchungen im Perm des Drauzuges.– Mitteilunger der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 82 (1989), 49–78. KRAINER, K. (1993): Late- and Post-Varsician Sediments of the Eastern and Southern Alps.– In: Von RAUMER, J.F. & NEUBAUER, F. (ed.): Premesozoic Geology in the Alps, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 537–564. KRAINER, K. (2005): The nonmarine Permian of the Eastern and Southern Alps: a re- view.– In: LUCAS, S.G. & ZEIGLER, K.E. (Ed.): The Nonmarine Permian. New Mexico Museum of History and Science Bulletin, 30, 159–169. MAROCCHI, M., MORELLI, C., MAIR, V., KLÖTZLI, U. & BARGOSSI, G.M. (2008): Evolution of large silicic magma systems: new U–Pb zircon data on the NW Per- mian Athesian Volcanic Group (Southern Alps, Italy).– The Journal of Geology, 116/5, 480–498. doi: 10.1086/590135 MIKLUKHO-MAKLAY, K.V. (1968): New Kazanian Cornuspiridae and Nodosariidae from the Russian platform. New species of fossil plants and invertebrates from the USSR.– VSEGEI, 2/1, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804441-4.00001-8 G eo lo gi a C ro at ic a Geologia Croatica 77/114 MILANOVIĆ, M. (1982): Carboniferous microfossil associations from Gorski kotar, Hr- vatsko Zagorje and Banija.− Palaeont. Jugosl., 28, 1−34. MULDER, T. & ALEXANDER, J. (2001): The physical character of subaqueous sedi- mentary density flows and their deposits.– Sedimentology, 48, 269–299. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2001.00360.x NEMEC, W. & STEEL, R.J. (1984): Alluvial and coastal conglomerates: their significant features and some comments on gravelly mass-flow deposits.– In: KOSTER, E.H. & STEEL, R.J. (eds.): Sedimentology of Gravels and Conglomerates. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 10, 1–31. PETTIJOHN, F.J., POTTER, P.E. & SIEVER, R. (1987): Sand and Sandstone. 2nd Edi- tion, Springer-Verlag, New York, 553 p. RAFFAELLI, P. & ŠĆAVNIČAR, B. (1968): Naslage gornjeg paleozoika Like i Gorskog kotara.– Prvi kolokvij o geologiji Dinaridov, Geološki zavod in Slovensko geološko društvo, 1, 21–27. RAMOVŠ, A. (1963): Biostratigrahie der Trogkofel-Stufe in Jugoslawien. Neues. Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Monatsh, 1963/7, 382–388. RAMOVŠ, A. (1968): Razvoj paleozoika v slovenskenm delu zunanjih Dinaridov.– I kol. geol. Dinaridov, 1. 7–19, Ljubljana. RAMOVŠ, A., HINTERLECHNER-RAVNIK, A., KALENIĆ, M., KARAMATA, S., KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V., KRSTIĆ, B., KULENOVIĆ, E., MIRKOVIĆ, M., PETKOVSKY, P., SREMAC, J. & TEMKOVA, V. (1990): Stratigraphic Correla- tion Forms of the Yugoslav Paleozoic.– Rendiconti Societa Geologica Italiana, 12 (1989), 359–383. RAMOVŠ, A. & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1965): Razvoj mlajšega paleozoika v okolici Orlneka na Dolenjskem.– Razprave IV razreda SAZU, 8, 319–416, Ljubljana. REIJMER, J.J.G., PALMIERI, P., GROEN, R. & FLOQUET, M. (2015): Calciturbidites and calcidebrites: Sea-level variations or tectonic processes?– Sedimentary Geol- ogy, 317, 53–70. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.10.013 SALOPEK, M. (1937): Proučavanje gornjeg paleozoika u Velebitu.– Ljetopis JAZU, 49, 188–192. SALOPEK, M. (1938): Proučavanje gornjeg paleozoika u Brušansko-Oštarijskom pro- doru.– Ljetopis JAZU, 50, 127–132. SALOPEK, M. (1939): Karbon i perm u okolini Brušana i Sv. Roka.– Ljetopis JAZU, 51, 135–139. SALOPEK, M. (1940): Gornji paleozoik i donji trijas u okolini Sv. Roka, Raduča i Met- ka.– Ljetopis JAZU, 52, 157–161. SALOPEK, M. (1941): Paleozojski prodor Velike Paklenice u Velebitu.– Ljetopis JAZU, 53, 158–163. SALOPEK, M. (1942): O gornjem paleozoiku Velebita u okolini Brušana i Baških Oštarija.– Rad JAZU, 274, 218–272. SALOPEK, M. (1948): O gornjem paleozoiku sjeveroistočnog podnožja Velebita i Like.– Prirodoslovna istraživanja JAZU, 24, 1–75. SALOPEK, M. (1949a): Gornji paleozoik u okolini Mrzle Vodice u Gorskom kotaru.– Ljetopis JAZU, 55 (1946–1948), 175–184. SALOPEK, M. (1949b): O gornjem paleozoiku u okolini Gerova i Tršća u Gorskom ko- taru.– Ljetopis JAZU, 55 (1946–1948), 193–198. SALOPEK, M. (1952): O gornjem permu Velike Paklenice u Velebitu.– Rad JAZU, 289, 5–26. SALOPEK, M. (1960): O gornjem paleozoiku u okolici Mrzle Vodice i Crnoga Luga.– Acta geol., 2, 121–132. SCHAFFHAUSER, M., KRAINER, K. & SANDERS, D. (2015): Early Permian carbon- ate shelf margin deposits: The type section of the Trogkofel Formation (Artinskian/ Kungurian), Carnic Alps, Austria/Italy. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 108, 277–301. doi: 10.17738/ajes.2015.0026 SCHÖNLAUB, H.P. (1982): Die Grauwackenzone in den Eisenerzer Alpen (Österreich).– Jb. Geol. B.–A. 124, 361–423. SCHUBERT, R.I. (1908): Zur Geologie des Österreichischen Velebit.– Jahrb. Geol. R. A., 58, 345 p. SCHUBERT, R.I. (1910): Erläuterunger zur Geologischen Karte der im Reichsrate ver- tretenen Königreiche und Länder der Österreich-Ungarn Monarchie, SW-Grupper Nr. 116, Medak–Sv Rok.– Geol. Reichsanst. Wien, 1–32. SOKAČ, B., NIKLER, L., VELIĆ, I. & MAMUŽIĆ, P. (1974): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100 000. List Gospić L33-127 [Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1:100000, Gospić sheet L33-127 – in Croatian].– Institut za geološka istraživanja Zagreb (1967), Savezni geološki institut, Beograd. SOKAČ, B., ŠĆAVNIČAR, B. & VELIĆ, I. (1976): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100.000, Tumač za list Gospić L33–127 [Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1:100000, Geology of the Gospić sheet – in Croatian].– Institut za geološka istraživanja, Zagreb (1967), Savezni geološki institut Beograd, 64 p. SREMAC, J. (1991): Zone Neoschwagerina craticulifera in the Middle Velebit Mt. (Cro- atia, Yugoslavia).– Geologija, 34, 7–55. SREMAC, J. (2005): Equatorial Shelf of the Palaeozoic Supercontinent – Cradle of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform.– Geologia Croatica, 58/1, 1–19. doi: 10.4154/ GC.2005.01 SREMAC, J. (2007): The Palaeozoic of Velebit Mt.– In: GRGASOVIĆ, T. & VLAHOVIĆ, I. (eds.): Field Trip Guidebook and Abstracts, 9th International Symposium on Fos- sil Algae Croatia in Zagreb, 2007. Croatian Geological Survey, 13–19. SREMAC, J. (2012): Influence on terrestrial sedimentation in Pennsylvanian rocks of Croatia.– Geologia Croatica, 65/3, 273–282. doi: 10.4154/GC.2012.18 SREMAC, J. & KOCHANSKY-DEVIDÉ, V. (1982): Paleozoik Hrvatske (kratki pregled).– In: SREMAC, J. (eds.): Vodič ekskurzije. Terenski sastanak Velebit (1982). IGCP Project br. 5, Jugoslavenska radna grupa, 3–7 (41–42), Zagreb. SUDAR, V., ALJINOVIĆ, D., SMIRČIĆ, D. & BARUDŽIJA, U. (2016): Composition and provenance of Gröden sandstone from the Velebit Mts.– The Mining-Geology- Petroleum Engineering Bulletin, 31/1, 53–67. doi: 10.17794/rgn.2016.1.6 SULEYMANOV, I.S. (1948): About some lower Carboniferous foraminifera from Ster- litamak district.– Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, geologicheskaya seriya, 62/19, 244–245. SWANSON, R.G. (1981): Standard Abbreviations For Lithologic Descriptions.– In: Sam- ple examination manual, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 140 p. TERRY, R.D. & CHILINGAR, G.V. (1955): Summary of „Concerning some additional aids in studying sedimentary formations“by M.S. Shvetsov.– Journal of Sedimen- tary Petrology, 25/3, 229–234. TIŠLJAR, J. (1994): Sedimentne stijene.– Školska knjiga, Zagreb, 433 p. TIŠLJAR, J., VLAHOVIĆ, I., SREMAC, J., VELIĆ, I., VESELI, V. & STANKOVIĆ, D. (1991): Excursion A – Velebit Mt. Permian-Jurassic.– In: VELIĆ, I. & VLAHOVIĆ, I. (eds.): Some aspects of the shallow water sedimentation of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform (Permain do Eocene). The Second International Sym- posium of the Adriatic Carbonate platform, Zadar, May 1991, Excursion Guide- book, 1–50, Zagreb. VLAHOVIĆ, I., TIŠLJAR, J., VELIĆ, I. & MATIČEC, D. (2005): Evolution of the Adri- atic Carbonate Platform: palaeogeography, main events and depositional dynam- ics.– Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 220, 333–360. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.01.011 VOZÁROVÁ, A., EBNER, F, KOVACS, S., KRAUTNER, H.-G., SZEDEKENYI, T., KRSTIĆ, B., SREMAC, J., ALJINOVIĆ, D., NOVAK, M. & SKABERNE, D. (2009): Late Variscian (Carboniferous to Permian) environments in the Circum Pan- nonian Region.– Geologica Carpathica, 60/1, 71–104. VRKLJAN, M., BOROJEVIĆ ŠOŠTARIĆ, S. & TOMAŠIĆ, N. (2018): Optička minera- logija, određivanje minerala polarizacijskim mikroskopom.– RGNF, PMF, Zagreb, 331 p. WELTJE, G.J. (1994): Provenance and dispersal of sand-sized sediments: reconstruction of dispersal patterns and sources of sand-sized sediments by means of inverse mod- eling techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht. Geologica ultraectina, 121 p. WELTJE, G.J., MEIJER, X.D. & DE BOER, P.L. (1998): Stratigraphic inversion of siliciclastic basin fills: a note on the distinction between supply resulting from tectonic and climatic forcing.– Basin Research, 10, 129–153. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2117.1998.00057.x WERNER, T., LEWANDOWSKI, M., VLAHOVIĆ, I., VELIĆ, I. & SIDORCZUK, M. (2015): Paleomagnetism and rock magnetism of the Permian redbeds from the Vel- ebit Mt. (Karst Dinarides, Croatia): dating of the early Alpine tectonics in the West- ern Dinarides by a secondary magnetization.– Tectonophysics, 651–652, 199–215. WHITNEY, D.L. & EVANS, B.W. (2010): Abbreviations for names of rock-forming min- erals.– American Mineralogist, 95, 185–187. doi: 10.2138/am.2010.3371 YARAHMADZAHI, H. & VACHARD, D. (2019): Moscovian-Asselian (Middle Penn- sylvanian–Earliest Cisuralian) smaller foraminifers from the Asad-Abad Section (Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, Central Iran).– Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 49/2, 107–130. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.49.2.107 URL1: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698325387 (visited September 2022) URL2: https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicCollectionSearch?collection_no=36241&is_ real_user=1 (visited September 2022) URL3: https://www.mindat.org/paleo_loc.php?id=83955 (visited September 2022) URL4: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698445150 (visited September 2022) URL5: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698325462 (visited November 2023) https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698325387 https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicCollectionSearch?collection_no=36241&is_real_user=1 https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicCollectionSearch?collection_no=36241&is_real_user=1 https://www.mindat.org/paleo_loc.php?id=83955 https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698445150 https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1698325462