Lewandowsky.indd 45 �Marek Lewandowski1,2, Ivo Velić3, Magdalena Sidorczuk4, Igor Vlahović5 and Josipa Velić5 AB STRA CT Post-Carboniferous deposits of the Karst Dinarides were analyzed in terms of their palaeomagnetic and rock mag- netic properties in order to identify the best sections for comprehensive palaeomagnetic studies on the geodynamic and palaeogeographic evolution of this mountain belt. A total of eighteen reconnaissance rock samples have been collected from the Permian red beds and dolomites, and Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous and Eocene carbonates. Most come from Velebit Mt., part of the Dinaric orogenic belt fi nally uplifted in the Oligocene–Miocene, and stretching NW–SE along the NE Adriatic coast. Experimental studies comprised identifi cation of potential carriers of a natural remanent magnetization (NRM) by means of their properties of Curie temperature and coercivity accompanied by SEM and microprobe studies, demagnetization of standard palaeomagnetic specimens by means of alternating fi eld and thermal cleaning, as well as the measurement and analysis of magnetic susceptibility and its anisotropy. Haema- tite (in Permian red beds) and Ti-magnetite (in carbonates) and sporadically goethite have been identifi ed as rema- nence carriers. The state of preservation, ascertained by SEM observations, suggests a detrital origin of NRM in most of the samples. Characteristic NRM components (ChRM), both of high coercivity and unblocking temperatures, could be clearly identifi ed in most of the specimens. These components show smeared distribution on the sphere and do not cluster around any known palaeomagnetic direction expected for the Velebit area from apparent polar wander paths, neither for Eurasia nor for Africa. This outcome suggests lack of overall remagnetization of the studied part of the Karst Dinarides after the last tectonic event and/or important contribution from tectonic rotations to the observed pattern of ChRM distribution. Keywords: Palaeomagnetism, Rock magnetism, Karst Dinarides, Adria, Velebit Mt., Croatia 1 Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ks. Janusza 64, 01-452 Warszawa, Poland; (lemar@twarda.pan.pl) 2 Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland 3 Croatian Geological Survey, Sachsova 2, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 4 Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland 5 Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia): prospects for applications in palaeogeographic and geotectonic studies Geologia Croatica 62/1 45–61 12 Figs. 1 Tab. Zagreb 2009 Geologia CroaticaGeologia Croatica � Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 46 1. INTRODUCTION Mesozoic and Cenozoic plate tectonic reconstructions of the Carpathian–Dinaride–Hellenic regions have been recently a matter of several syntheses, involving geologic and palaeo- magnetic data (VAN DIJK & SCHEEPERS, 1995; NEUGE- BAUER et al., 2001; STAMPFLI & BOREL, 2002; CSON- TOS & VÖRÖS, 2004). The main crustal units of this area are the Alcapa, Tisza–Dacia and Adria composite terrains, from which a wealth of palaeomagnetic results have been collected during the past decades (see VAN DIJK & SCHE- EPERS, 1995; BESSE & COURTILLOT, 2002; CSONTOS & VÖRÖS, 2004; MUTTONI et al., 2005 for references). A particular gap in this palaeomagnetic data set of Adria is due to relatively restricted palaeomagnetic research in the terri- tory of Croatia and neighbouring countries, although signif- icant progress has recently been made due to the works of Emő Márton and co-workers (MÁRTON et al., 1995, 1999, 2002, 2003, 2008; see also MÁRTON & VELJOVIĆ, 1983). The main purpose of this study was to check the general rock properties of the different units, in order to be able to plan further activities enabling a better insight into a com- plex tectonic and palaeogeographic evolution of the Karst Dinarides. Therefore, to learn more about the pre-Cenozoic history of the Croatian part of the Adria plate, we performed reconnaissance palaeomagnetic studies in the wider area of Velebit Mt. in Lika and Northern Dalmatia (Fig. 1), which are characterized by rocks of a very wide stratigraphic range. It was particularly important to check a working hypothesis on the possible post-tectonic remagnetization of the Velebit structure that would prevent us from undertaking a more in- depth palaeomagnetic study on the palaeogeographic and geotectonic evolution of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform and its underlying and overlying units. 2. PREVIOUS PALAEOMAGNETIC STUDIES There has been some previous palaeomagnetic study of the Karst Dinarides, but the complexity of their geological his- tory requires a systematic approach. In Northern Croatia, (part of the Pannonian Basin), somewhat more palaeomag- netic measurements were performed in Neogene deposits, including those by MÁRTON et al. (1999, 2002, 2006), MÁRTON & FODOR (2003), BABINSZKI et al. (2007) and VASILIEV et al. (2007). Most of the previous palaeomagnetic investigations of the Karst Dinarides were either performed a relatively long time ago (e.g. MÁRTON & VELJOVIĆ, 1983; MÁRTON & MILIČEVIĆ, 1994; KISSEL et al., 1995; MÁRTON et al., 1995), or the area of the Karst Dinarides was not a major focus of the investigations (e.g. MAURITSCH et al., 1995; CHANNELL, 1996). Only recently, have papers on the palaeo- magnetic study of the relatively stable areas of the Karst Di- narides been published by MÁRTON et al. (2003, 2008), in which the youngest Jurassic, Cretaceous and Palaeogene rocks were studied. MÁRTON et al. (2008) indicate general concordance with the African polar wander path during the youngest Jurassic and Cretaceous, but with a slight displace- ment interpreted as a consequence of about 10° CCW rota- tion of Istria in comparison with the African motion. In the earlier paper MÁRTON et al. (2003) concluded that the area of stable Istria must have been 30° CCW rotated in the Ter- tiary relative to Africa and stable Europe, but also indicated that Maastrichtian–Eocene platform carbonates from Central Dalmatia were subsequently remagnetized, either during the Late Eocene–Oligocene tectonic deformation or by Miocene hydrocarbon migration. A recent study by SATOLLI et al. (2008) also indicated coherent movement of Adria with respect to Africa during the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, and the difference in the position of their apparent polar wander paths for this period was interpreted as being a consequence of a subsequent 26° CCW rotation, probably connected with Apenninic orogenesis. Rocks selected for the purpose of this study have not been, up to our knowledge, palaeomagnetically studied yet. 3. GEOLOGIC SETTING The area of the Karst Dinarides is composed of a thick se- quence of deposits, representing a wide stratigraphic range (Carboniferous to Recent). Most of the rocks cropping out in Central, Western and Southern Croatia originated from the ancient Adriatic Carbonate Platform, which lasted from the Late Early Jurassic to the end of the Cretaceous (see dis- cussion in VLAHOVIĆ et al., 2005). Others include the rest of the basement rocks and relatively thin overlying carbon- ate and siliciclastic deposits. The entire sequence is probably up to 10 km thick, but due to the intense tectonics the thick- ness may only be estimated. The target rocks, comprising clastics and carbonates of Permian to Eocene age, crop out in the central part of the Karst Dinarides (Fig. 1). They include thick carbonates and some clastics (Fig. 2), deposited in different palaeogeograph ic settings, from mixed siliciclastic–carbonate environments of the epeiric sea to a more or less isolated intraoceanic carbon- ate platform. Palaeogeographic positions varied from equa- torial latitudes in the Permian to progressively more northern latitudes during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Different areas were also submitted to different diagenetic conditions (es- pecially regarding burial depths, which vary from several hundred metres for the youngest to several thousand metres for the oldest rocks). Furthermore, it was apparent at the be- ginning of the investigation that it was necessary to sample rocks of such a wide stratigraphic range (from Middle Per- mian to Eocene, i.e. from approximately 265 to 50 MY) in order to check whether the area of Velebit was remagnetized during the important tectonic event connected with the col- lision and the fi nal uplift of the Dinarides. The general succession of deposits in the central part of the Karst Dinarides, i.e. in the Velebit Mt. and neighbouring area, is presented in Fig. 2. For more information on the suc- cession and its stratigraphy see VELIĆ et al., 2002; VLA- HOVIĆ et al., 2005; VELIĆ, 2007 (and references therein). Sampling localities are shown on Fig. 1, and logistic data are included in Table 1. Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 47 Fi gu re 1: Geographical position of the studied area (A, B – shaded area represents Velebit Mt.), and schematic geological map (simplifi ed after FGI, 1970) showing the positions of the samples (C). Legend: PRP – Prpići, CRN – Crne Grede, KOS – Košna, KALV – Kalvarija, RIZ – Rizvanuša, BIO – Biograd, MAL – Mali Halan, OTR – Otrić, DIM – Dimići. A B C Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 48 Fi gu re 2: A schematic geological col- umn of the Velebit Mt. area illustrat- ing the stratigraphic position of the sampling localities of this study (see Fig. 1 for symbols description). Time scale after GRADSTEIN et al. (2004). Palaeogene/Neogene events and de- posits, which are not a topic of this paper, are presented very simplifi ed. Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 49 The oldest sequences of rocks cropping out in the Karst Dinarides were deposited from the Carboniferous to the re- gional emergence in the Early Permian, and from the Middle Permian to the next regional emergence in the Middle/Late Triassic (Fig. 2). Of these, the oldest cropping out in the area of Karst Dinarides are the Upper Carboniferous, (Moscov- ian), predominantly clastic deposits. Similar deposition con- tinued into the Permian, then after an emergent phase in the Early Permian, it continued until the end of the Middle Per- mian. This part of the sequence was sampled at Košna (sam- ple KOS) and Crne Grede (sample CRN). A thick succession of carbonates, with only a sporadic and relatively weak in- put of clastic rocks, is composed of Middle/Upper Permian dolomites (samples Kalvarija – KALV, and Rizvanuša – RIZ), Lower Triassic dolomites and Middle Triassic recrys- tallized limestones. All these rocks were deposited in mixed siliciclastic–carbonate environments of the epeiric sea, prob- ably along the NE margins of Gondwana (see discussion in VLAHOVIĆ et al., 2005). After a long emergent phase, lasting between the Ladin- ian or Early Carnian (in places even Anisian), until the Late Norian, a thick succession of pure carbonates was deposited. These represented part of a huge carbonate platform on which regionally important and recognizable facies, including the Main Dolomite (Hauptdolomit) and Lithiotis Limestones were deposited throughout the area of present southern and southeastern Europe, and elsewhere. This sequence, which continued until the end of the Early Jurassic, was sampled at the Prpići locality (sample PRP). During the Toarcian, the huge former platform was dis- sected into several small platforms surrounded by drowned basinal areas, including the Adriatic Carbonate Platform which was probably connected towards the south to the Kruja, Gavrovo–Tripolitza and Menderes platforms in present Al- bania, Greece and Turkey. This huge area was isolated from direct continental infl uences because it was surrounded by a deep Tethyan ocean, but frequent occurrences of dinosaurs indicate at least temporal connections with Africa until the Mid-Cretaceous, and with Eurasia during the Late Creta- ceous, when the platform fi nally disintegrated heralding the beginning of collision with the European plate. This se- quence was sampled in Mali Halan (samples MAL), Otrić (sample OTR) and Dimići (samples DIM), while the young- est Cretaceous rocks (Upper Santonian) were sampled at Bio- grad (sample BIO1). After the shorter or longer emergent phase, deposition was renewed only in the deeper parts of the pre-existing palaeo- relief. As a result of intense tectonics, shallow marine, ramp carbonates, (Foraminifera Limestones – sample BIO2), were gradually replaced by deeper-marine fl ysch sediments in elongated basins. Regressive Promina deposits are only vis- ible in some locations, and end with thick alluvial deposits. The tectonic stress, oriented NE–SW (in present-day geo- graphic coordinates), intensifi ed during the Late Eocene re- sulted in the Oligocene and Early Miocene with the intense uplift of the Dinarides. This uplift is marked in places by massive Tertiary carbonate breccia, while the change of tec- tonic stress in the younger, neotectonic phase, was charac- Table 1: Basic data for sample collection. Legend: S.A. – sample azimuth; S.D. – sample dip; B.A. – bedding azimuth, B.D. – bedding dip. LOCALITY HAND SAMPLES LITHOLOGY AGE UTM COORDINATES SYMBOL S.A. S.D. B.A. B.D. x y Rizvanuša RIZ1 294 62 214 85 Dolomite U. Permian 5524541 4926595 RIZ2 284 81 208 81 Dolomite L. Triassic Košna KOS1 138 52 138 52 Red sandstone M. Permian 5519453 4929872 Kalvarija KALV 128 50 205 89 Dolomite U. Permian 5521786 4928382 Crne Grede CRN1 10 120 190 60 Red sandstone M. Permian 5517390 4929628 Prpići PRP1 111 70 240 10 Dolomite Norian 5512127 4932680 Mali Halan MAL1 6 51 202 40 Limestone Hettangian 5552426 4905346 MAL2 10 135 190 55 Limestone Pliensbachian 5552337 4904942 MAL3 120 123 197 57 Limestone Toarcian 5551459 4904986 MAL4 50 131 230 49 Limestone M. Jurassic 5551437 4904819 MAL5 101 0 225 69 Limestone Oxfordian 5551705 4903297 MAL6 216 70 216 70 Limestone Kimmeridgian 5551512 4902925 Otrić OTR1 305 75 76 37 Limestone M. Jurassic 5586321 4899795 Dimići zapad DIM1 220 73 39 23 Limestone Callovian 5588429 4898868 DIM2 348 16 57 10 Limestone Oxfordian 5588726 4899063 DIM3 46 15 71 11 Limestone Kimmeridgian 5588878 4899184 Biograd BIO1 230 42 210 55 Limestone U. Santonian 5537087 4866758 BIO2 232 114 232 55 Limestone L. Eocene 5537089 4866756 Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 50 terized by a N–S oriented stress and mostly stike-slip move- ments, which fi nally shaped the Karst Dinarides. 4. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Eighteen magnetically oriented hand samples, treated as a reconnaissance collection, were taken from rocks of varied ages from the Permian to the Eocene (Table 1). Hand sam- ples were cored in the laboratory into standard palaeomag- netic cores, 1” diameter, yielding a total of 59 cores. Of these, 48 cores yielded sound palaeomagnetic results, en- abling the identifi cation of components of the natural rema- nent magnetization (NRM). Stable, characteristic components of NRM (ChRM) were used for the preliminary as sessment of the relative rotations of the succession from the Velebit area with respect to Eurasia and Africa. The magnetic min- eralogy was assessed using the method of LOWRIE (1990), supported by SEM and microprobe studies for better under- standing of the nature of NRM. The Lowrie test was per- formed on standard-sized specimens, which were initially stepwise pulse magnetized along the z axis up to 2.7 mT to obtain the coercivity characteristics in a form of an induced remanent magnetization (IRM) curve. Next, the same spec- imens were pulse magnetized along the z, y and x axes in nominal fi elds of 2.7, 0.4, and 0.12 mT, respectively (LOW- RIE, 1990), and, subsequently subjected to thermal demagne- tization, providing information on unblocking temperatures (Néel temperature, Tub) for each of the IRM three -compo- nents. Changes in the low-fi eld susceptibility (κ) during the thermal demagnetization experiment were routinely moni- tored using the low-fi eld KLY–2 susceptibility bridge. Varia- tion of the initial magnetic susceptibility along the lithostrati- graphic column was used to infer changes of paramagnetic minerals infl ux into the sedimentary basin. The anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility (AMS) of 75% of the speci- mens was measured, and the density distribution of the prin- cipal components of the AMS ellipsoids was calculated us- ing the SpheriStat package (STESKY, 1995). AMS study was performed to check the potential effects on internal rock deformation induced by tectonic stress (see TARLING & HROUDA, 1993). All cores were subjected to thermal demagnetization in a Magnetic Minerals MM–1 furnace. Each specimen was heated in steps up to 580°C, except for the haematite-bear- ing rocks, which were heated up to 670°C. After each de- magnetization step, cores were cooled in a zero magnetic fi eld and measured on a 2G SQUID cryogenic magneto meter with a residual internal fi eld below 3 nT and a noise level of less than 10–7 A/M (compared to 2 x 10–6 A/M of the most advanced spinner magnetometers). These characteristics en- sure the complete demagnetization of the sampled rocks and identifi cation of the most subtle NRM components, preventing unfavourable mineralogical changes in a course of thermal demagnetization. The cores exhibiting spurious magnetiza- tion and/or an NRM intensity close to the magnetometer noise level were excluded from the demagnetization proce- dure. Both the furnace and the SQUID magnetometer were operated inside a pair of Helmholz coils, reducing the ambi- ent geomagnetic fi eld by at least 95%. Some specimens were demagnetized by means of alternating fi eld (AF), using mag- netically shielded solenoids, combined with the SQUID. Palaeomagnetic Data Analysis (PDA) software by LEWAN DOWSKI et al. (1997), employing principal com- ponent analysis (KIRSCHVINK, 1980), was used to calcu- late the characteristic NRM components (ChRM) from the demagnetization data of each specimen, and to plot the or- thogonal demagnetization diagrams. ChRM components with angular standard deviation greater than 8° were exclud ed from further analysis. Standard FISHER (1953) statistics were used to calculate the characteristic mean direction for the remaining ChRM populations. GMAP by TORSVIK & SMETHURST (1999) has been used for recalculation of the palaeomagnetic directions from apparent polar wander paths (APWP). The rock samples (approximately 2 kg each) were dis- solved in acetic acid (cf. HOUNSLOW & MAHER, 1999), and magnetic minerals were extracted from the insoluble fraction by a neodymium magnet placed in a removable, thin latex envelope. The extracts were analyzed by scanning elec- tron microscope with EDX, JEOL JSM–6380LA. Thin sec- tions were analyzed by electron microprobe with a Cameca WDX SX 100 device in order to identify the chemical com- position of ferrimagnetic grains. 5. RESULTS 5.1. Rock magnetic results Rock magnetic studies revealed the presence of both soft and hard magnetic phases in the studied rocks. Permian red beds of the Košna unit (Fig. 3A) do not contain any magnetite. Specimens were not saturated up to the fi eld of 2.7 mT, and the maximum of Tub for each of three induced components was in the range of 670°C, unequivocally demonstrating the presence of haematite. In contrast to the Košna deposits, the Upper Permian limestones of Rizvanuša (Fig. 3B) contain a mixture of low and very high coercivity mineral phases. It is clearly dem- onstrated by the bimodal trend of the IRM curve, showing a steep slope up to the 0.2 T fi eld, followed by a remanence plateau up to 0.9 mT, and continued by a gradual increase of the remanence, yet not saturated in the highest fi eld. The presence of two different magnetic phases is confi rmed by the Lowrie test, where the hard magnetic phase has a Tub of ca. 670°C, while the soft one shows a Tub of the order of 540°C, implying the presence of haematite and Ti-poor mag- netite, respectively. Callovian limestones of Dimići (Fig. 3C) show the presence of a single magnetic phase with a low co- ercivity, easily saturated with the magnetic fi eld of 0.2 T. This phase shows a Tub around 540°C, characteristic for Ti- poor magnetite. Upper Santonian carbonates of Biograd (Fig. 3D) show an IRM arcuate shaped curve up to the highest imposed mag- netic fi eld. This is indicative for the presence of a hard co- ercivity mineral, which was still unsaturated in the fi eld of 2.7 T. Thermal demagnetization shows a low unblocking Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 51 Fi gu re 3: Results of the Lowrie test of typical samples. Induced remanence acquisition curves (left plots) and thermal demagnetization of the remanence induced along z (triangles), y (open circles) and x (full circles) specimens axes (right plots). See text for more detailed descriptions of diagrams. A B C D Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 52 temperature for the high coercivity phase (Tub ca. 150°C), coexisting with a phase of Tub near 580°C, characteristic for goethite and magnetite, respectively. 5.2. Susceptibility results Magnetic susceptibility varied from site to site, and generally, three groups of susceptibilities can be distinguished (Fig. 4A): group L, with very low values, ranging from –12.78 to +4.61x10–6 SI, group I with intermediate susceptibilities (+30.9 to +84.9x10–6 SI), and group H, characterized by high susceptibilities (from +109.7 to +194.2x10–6 SI). Group L has susceptibilities comparable with typical platform car- bonates, with a very low content of ferrimagnetic grains, while group I has values comparable with the susceptibili- ties of pelagic limestones (cf. LEWANDOWSKI et al., 2005). Group I comprises the Upper Permian and Lower Tri- assic rocks, as well as the Middle Jurassic carbonates. Group H comprises carbonate deposits spanning the Upper Triassic to the lower parts of the Middle Jurassic, having susceptibil- ity values comparable with the red beds of the Middle Perm- ian age. Older and younger carbonates all display the L cat- egory of susceptibility. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility is of generally low values (Fig. 4B), which is rather an unexpected result for the rocks relatively strongly affected by tectonics. The degree of anisotropy (Pj, JELINEK, 1981) does not generally ex- ceed 3%. The exception are rocks of Crne Grede and Otrić (Middle Permian and the Middle Jurassic age, respectively), both having the L category of susceptibility. Their Pj values indicate a strongly developed foliation (Fig. 4B), for the de- formation of sphere exceeding 10%, up to 40% with a posi- tive value of the shape parameter T (JELINEK, 1981). These data indicate an increased degree of internal deformation of rocks of Crne Grede and Otrić sites, located close to the ma- jor fault and regional nappe system margin, respectively, al- though a heightened infl ux of clay minerals to the sedimen- tary basin may also be important. 5.3. SEM and electron microprobe results Insoluble residuals of Velebit Mt. carbonates contain a vari- ety of magnetic fractions. The most interesting for study were those magnetic phases with the potential of represent- ing remanence carriers. Most of the identifi ed magnetic grains of this group were magnetites/Ti-magnetites, with different Fi gu re 4: (A) Variation of the magnetic susceptibility parameter κ; (B) Anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility – variability of magnetic foliation Pj (JELINEK, 1981). Ranges of categories of susceptibilities are shown: L (low) – light grey, I (intermediate) – medium grey, and H (high) – dark grey. A B Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 53 Ti contents. The gain shapes frequently indicate a detrital origin, with sharp edges possibly indicating proximal sour ces. Grains with rounded edges suggest more distal transport, but some diagenetic infl uence due to dissolution by reducing fl uids cannot be excluded. Spheres of diagenetic mag netite/ maghemite with an exclusive iron composition, probably af- ter pyrite replacement, were also observed, as well as fram- boidal pyrite spheres formed by aggregated subcrystals. Grain dimensions, on average, span between pseudo-single- domain states (dozen µm) to multidomain grains (>20 µm). Typical examples are shown in Figs. 5–7. 5.4. Palaeomagnetic results The overall mean NRM measured for 45 specimens has the orientation D=14o, I=51o (present-day coordinates – Fig. 8), and is very similar to the present-day direction of the re- gional geomagnetic vector, expected for the mean sampling localities coordinates of 45°N/15°E from the geocentric, axial dipole model (D=0o, I=63o). This result proves that sample orientations were correct and that the present-day geomag- netic vector may have had an important contribution to the total remanence acquired in the rocks of the Velebit area. Fi gu re 5: (A) Well sorted, detrital Ti-poor magnetite (MAL3–3), indicative of a distal source; (B) Ti-poor magnetite (MAL5–5) and magnetite spherule (MAL5–6) of a pseudo-single-domain dimension, potential carrier of a stable NRM (Lower Jurassic carbonates, Mali Halan). A B Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 54 5.4.1. Results of alternating fi eld demagnetization Most of the specimens responded very well to AF cleaning due to the presence of Ti-magnetite, although chaotic trends in demagnetization curves could also be encountered. The Middle Permian limestones of Crne Grede (Fig. 9A) show a two-component structure of NRM. While the initial intensity is very low, the specimen could be successfully de- magnetized almost to null values of the magnetization inten- sity. A low coercivity component is close to the present-day geomagnetic vector at the sampling site and can be regarded as a contemporary overprint. The stable component, identi- fi ed in the range of 25–40 mT, has a northerly direction with a shallow inclination (geographical coordinates, Fig. 9A). Upper Permian limestones of Kalvarija (Fig. 9B) show a similar NRM structure, but due to a stronger (by an order of magnitude) initial value of NRM, its components could be much more precisely determined. The Lower Triassic limestones of Rizvanuša (Fig. 9C) mainly show a zigzag demagnetization trend, except for a soft, steeply inclined component. The Upper Triassic limestones of Prpići (Fig. 9D) contain two components with similar orientation toward the North and moderate inclination. The nonlinear shape of the demagneti- zation path indicates overlapping coercivity spectra, which makes precise identifi cation of these components impossible. Middle Jurassic limestones of the Mali Halan section (Fig. 9E) show generally nonlinear demagnetization paths, characteristic for components with overlapping coercivity spectra. Nonetheless, linear segments of demagnetization trajectories can be seen, enabling identifi cation of two ChRM components. The soft one is directed along the ambient, present-day geomagnetic vector, while the harder component points to the North with intermediate inclination (geograph- ical coordinates, Fig. 9E). Middle Jurassic limestones from Otrić (Fig. 9F) also have a bimodal NRM structure and similar characteristics to those from the Mali Halan. Similarly, the inclination of the ChRM component is steeper than within Permian carbonates. Kimmeridgian limestones of Dimići (Fig. 9G) contain two components of NRM. The soft one (up to 15 mT) is of Fi gu re 6: (A) Magnetite grain of Callovian carbonates of Dimići; DIM1–1 iron oxide (magnetite?), incorporated into a group of clay minerals; (B) DIM1–3 detrital iron oxide, probably magnetite, with attached surface coats of clay minerals, as indicated by EDS spectra. A B Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 55 Fi gu re 7: Poorly sorted, Ti-magnetite grains of the Upper Santonian carbonates (Biograd). (A) BIO1–1 Ti-rich magnetite grain, BIO1–2 magnetite(?) and BIO1–3 an unidentifi ed mineral phase containing Bi; (B) BIO1–9 magnetite exhibiting sharp edges, suggesting detrital origin from a proximal source. A B Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 56 viscous, present-day origin, while the stable, higher coerci- vity component of reversed polarity shows a SSW orientation with shallow inclination (after tectonic correction, Fig. 9G). A good example of the chaotic trends in demagnetiza- tion is the specimen of the Eocene limestones of Biograd (Fig. 9H). Santonian limestones of the same locality, how- ever, show linear trends enabling determination of two NRM components, while the third component resides in a hard co- ercivity phase and it cannot be resolved by AF demagnetiza- tion (Fig. 9I). 5.4.2. Results of thermal demagnetization Middle Permian Košna red beds were not treated by the AF method, since only haematite has been identifi ed by the Low- rie test. Thermal demagnetization (Fig. 10A, B) reveals a bimodal structure of NRM with the characteristic remanence component pointing NWN with rather shallow inclination (geographic position). In general, thermal cleaning was also fairly effective in revealing NRM composition, although the AF method se- emed to be better in some cases. For instance, thermal de- magnetization of Middle Permian Crne Grede limestones (Fig. 10C) yielded a rather poorly defi ned component resid- ing in grains of moderate Tub (150–350°C). Although a gen- eral direction of ChRM is similar to the one identifi ed by AF (Fig. 9A), the quality of the latter is defi nitively higher. Also, thermal cleaning of the Upper Permian carbonates of Kal- varija was less effective than AF demagnetization (cf. Fig. 10D and Fig. 9B) and yielded results that could not be inter- preted. Upper Permian carbonates of Rizvanuša (Fig. 10E) show weak magnetization. Despite low reliability due to higher A.S.D. values (up to 10°), ChRM orientations are relatively coherent at the sample level. Maximum Tub suggests a Ti- magnetite carrier of NRM, and do not confi rm the presence of haematite, ascertained by the Lowrie test. This may be a result of the inhomogeneous distribution of haematite in these rocks. A steep, generally southwesterly directed ChRM (palaeohorizontal) could be determined, which makes ther- mal cleaning more successful than AF in this case. Thermal cleaning was quite effective in the case of the Middle Triassic Prpići rocks (Fig. 10F), where NRM com- ponents could, in contrast to AF cleaning, be isolated due to the linear trajectories of the demagnetization paths. Values of 500°C for maximum Tub suggest the presence of Ti-mag- netite. Upper Jurassic limestones of Dimići (Fig. 10G) respond ed fairly well to thermal cleaning, despite a low intensity of NRM. Maximum Tub is around 475°C, suggesting Ti-mag- netite as the main remanence carrier. ChRM show a north- easterly orientation with moderately shallow inclination (geo- graphical coordinates, Fig. 10G) and is similar to the ChRM obtained by the AF method. Mali Halan limestones (Fig. 10H, I) show a similar NRM structure, recorded in rock samples collected at different sites. A stable ChRM component shows a moderately steep, northerly orientation, in line with results obtained from the AF method. This component features Tub of ca. 450°C, sug- gesting the presence of Ti-magnetite. Results obtained from the rocks of Otrić (Fig. 10J) are again essentially the same as for the AF method, both in the shape of the demagnetization path and in the direction of ChRM. Despite a very weak remanence, thermal cleaning could be performed down to the SQUID noise level, since, fortunately, no secondary magnetic phases were formed in the course of thermal cleaning. A maximum Tub of ca. 450°C is indicative of Ti-magnetite grains. Thermal demagnetization of the Santonian limestones of Biograd (Fig. 10K) yielded only one component, in con- trast to the three components of NRM ascertained by means of AF cleaning. A thermal demagnetization diagram demon- strates a straight line segment for almost the whole range of temperatures, thus indicating the presence of a single com- ponent. Notably, specimens treated with temperature show a component of opposite polarity to that demagnetized by AF. 5.4.3. ChRM directions – a general interpretation A small number of independently oriented samples per strati- graphic site exclude any reliable calculation of overall char- acteristic directions and a virtual palaeopole position for each sampled unit. This, however, does not preclude a gen- eral interpretation of all individually isolated ChRMs, based on their comparison with a reference path of palaeomagnetic directions expected for the studied area, on the basis of an assumption on the structural coherence of the Velebit Mt. rocks either with Gondwanian or European crust. The refer- ence path (RP) can be established by recalculation of post- Carboniferous palaeopoles of Gondwana and Eurasia (data for Carboniferous and Triassic after VAN DER VOO (1993), and from BESSE & COURTILLOT (2002) for younger geo- logic ages) at the reference site (coordinates 45°N, 15°E), as Fi gu re 8: Distribution of NRM direction, measured for undemagnetized spe cimens. Open/full symbols represent upper/lower hemisphaere, present-day geomagnetic fi eld vector (PDF) is marked by a grey triangle. Overall mean (marked by crossed dot) with associated α95 confi dence limit is shown for comparison with PDF direction. Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 57 Fi gu re 9: Results of AF demagnetization of typical samples (see text for sample locations and age). The plots are equal area, orthogonal (Zijderveld), and normalized intensity de- cay of induced remanent magnetization. Open/full symbols represent the upper/lower stereonet hemisphaere, squares/ circles at Zijderveld plots denote projections onto horizon- tal/vertical planes. Units on the orthogonal plots are in μA/M. A B C D E F G H I Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 58 Fi gu re 10: (continued on the next page) A B C D E F G H Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 59 shown in the Fig. 11. In the Fig. 12, in turn, ChRM direc- tions are depicted both in their geographic coordinates (i.e. before correction for tilt) and in a palaeohorizontal frame (i.e. after correction for tilt), to be confronted with RPs. In the palaeohorizontal frame (Fig. 12B), most ChRM vectors show steep inclinations, incompatible with the known palaeo- geographic history of Adria, which remained constantly at equatorial to moderate palaeolatitudes during Mesozoic– Cenozoic time (DERCOURT et al., 2000; GOLONKA, 2000). We suppose, therefore, that these directions do not represent primary NRM components. In the geographic frame (Fig. 12A), however, the Permo- Triassic deposits of Košna, Crne Grede, Rizvanuša, and Kal- varija show low-to-moderate inclinations and smeared dec- linations within the NNW–ENE sector, rotated at a different degree from the coeval directions of the RPs of Africa and Eurasia. The same applies to the Middle Jurassic rocks of Mali Halan and Dimići. In general, Fig. 12 depicts a scat- tered distribution of ChRM vectors, meaning that there was no common post-tectonic remagnetization of all the studied rocks. Although the monoclinal structure of the investigated strata precluded fold tests, the smeared distribution of the characteristic components suggests an important, tectonic involvement of the rocks in question, the nature and mean- ing of which remains an open question. Future investigations will therefore focus on more de- tailed palaeomagnetic and rock-magnetic studies of available fold structures along the range of Velebit Mt. and their time- equivalent rocks in the south-easternmost part of Croatia. These planned studies should help in the identifi cation of primary (pre-folding) and secondary NRM components, mak- ing the geotectonic history of Dinarides better bracketed in the palaeogeographic frame. 6. CONCLUSIONS Taking into account the results obtained in this study, the fol- lowing conclusions can be drawn: Fi gu re 11: Outline of palaeomagnetic reference directions, recalcu- lated for the site 45°N/15°E (Gospić area, Velebit Mt.) from current APWPs for Africa and Eurasia (see text for details). Legend: open/full symbols and broken/solid line represent upper/lower hemisphere, res- pectively; C3 – Upper Carboniferous, P – Permian, T – Triassic, J – Jurassic, K – Cretaceous, Tr – Tertiary. Fi gu re 10: Results of thermal demagnetization (continued from the previous page). See Fig. 9 for symbols explanation. I J K Geologia Croatica Geologia Croatica 62/1 60 (1) In most cases, rocks of Velebit Mt. yielded interpretable palaeomagnetic results. (2) The area of Velebit Mt. was not completely remagnetized during the latest (Neogene) tectonic event, since ChRMs do not exhibit a normal (Fisherian) distribution around the palaeomagnetic direction, expected for the Velebit region in the Neogene. (3) The Upper Triassic to Middle Jurassic deposits show a higher magnetic susceptibility than older and younger rocks. This may be attributed to a higher infl ux of mag- netic grains due to geotectonic and volcanic processes, initiated by the break up of Pangea. (4) Ti-magnetite and haematite were the principal magnetic carriers; most of the grains are of detrital origin. (5) Both AF and thermal cleaning were effi cient for isolation of NRM components. (6) AF cleaning yielded particularly good results for the Up- per Triassic of Prpići, the Upper Permian of Kalvarija and the Middle Jurassic of Mali Halan. (7) Thermal demagnetization was particularly successful for the Upper Triassic of Prpići and the Callovian limestones of Dimići. (8) The characteristic components obtained for Permo-Tri- assic and Middle Jurassic rocks display declinations within the NNW to ENE sector with moderate to shallow incli- nations, when observed in geographical coordinates. Such overall distributions, compared with the expected direc- tion for Adria in Mesozoic–Cenozoic time, suggest tec- tonic rotations with respect to Gondwana. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This paper resulted from the bilateral Polish–Croatian interacademic project ‘Palaeogeographic History of the Adria Plate: Palaeomagnetic Reconstruction’ (2007–2009, principal investigators Marek Lewan- dowski and Igor Vlahović), and the work was supported by the host in- stitutions of Marek Lewandowski and the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia through grants 195-1953068-0242, 195-1953068-2704 and 195-1951293-0237. The study was partly sup- ported by the Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw (Projects No. BW 1761/2 and BST 1331/2). The authors are grateful to Niels ABRA- HAMSEN and Jerzy NAW ROCKI for their constructive suggestions on the fi rst version of this paper. REFERENCES BABINSZKI, E., MÁRTON, E., MÁRTON, P. & KISS, L.F. (2007): Widespread occurrence of greigite in the sediments of Lake Pan- non: Implications for environment and magnetostratigraphy.– Pal- aeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 252, 626–636. BESSE, J. & COURTILLOT, V. (2002): Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic fi eld over the last 200 Myr.– J. Geophys. Res., 107, (B11), 2300, doi: 10.1029/2000JB000050. CHANNELL, J.E.T. (1996): Palaeomagnetism and palaeogeography of Adria.– In: MORRIS, A. & TARLING, D.H. (eds.): Palaeomagne- tism and Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region. Geological Soci- ety of London, Spec. Publicat., 105, 119–132. CSONTOS, L. & VÖRÖS, A. (2004): Mesozoic plate tectonic recon- struction of the Carpathian region.– Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 210, 1–56. DERCOURT, J., GAETANI, M., VRIELYNCK, B., BARRIER, E., BI- JU-DUVAL, B., BRUNET, M.F., CADET, J.P., CRASQUIN, S. & SANDULESCU, M. (eds.) (2000): Peri-Tethys palaeogeographical atlas.– Commision for the Geological Map of the World, Paris. FISHER, R. (1953): Dispersion on the sphere.– Proc. R. Astron. Soc., A217, 295–305. FGI (1970): Geological Map of SFR Yugoslavia 1:500,000.– Federal Geological Institute, Beograd. GOLONKA, J. (2000): Cambrian–Neogene plate tectonics maps.– Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków. GRADSTEIN, F.M., OGG, J.G., SMITH, A.G., AGTERBERG, F.P., BLEEKER, W., COOPER, R.A., DAVYDOV, V., GIBBARD, P., HINNOV, L.A., HOUSE, M.R., LOURENS, L., LUTERBACHER, H.P., MCARTHUR, J., MELCHIN, M.J., ROBB, L.J., SHERGOLD, J., VILLENEUVE, M., WARDLAW, B.R., ALI, J., BRINKHUIS, H., HILGEN, F.J., HOOKER, J., HOWARTH, R.J., KNOLL, A.H., LASKAR, J., MONECHI, S., PLUMB, K.A., POWELL, J., RAFFI, I., RÖHL, U., SADLER, P., SANFILIPPO, A., SCHMITZ, B., SHACKLETON, N.J., SHIELDS, G.A., STRAUSS, H., VAN DAM, J., VAN KOLFSCHOTEN, T., VEIZER, J. & WILSON, D. (2004): A Geologic Time Scale 2004.– Cambridge University Press, 589 p. HOUNSLOW, M.W. & MAHER, B.A. (1999): Laboratory procedures for quantitative extraction and analysis of magnetic minerals from sediments.– In: WALDEN, J., OLDFIELD, F. & SMITH, J. (eds.): Environmental Magnetism, A Practical Guide. Quaternary Research Association, Technical Guide, 6, 139–164. JELINEK, V. (1981): Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks.– Tectonophys., 79, 63–67. Fi gu re 12: Characteristic remanent magnetization in geographic (A) and palaeohorizontal (B) frame, obtained in this study. Note the lack of a distinctive direction governing overall vector distribution. Dots/ squares are directions obtained due to thermal/AF cleaning, respec- tively. Other symbols are explained in the Fig. 8. A B Geologia CroaticaLewandowski et al.: First rock magnetic and palaeomagnetic analyses of the Pre-Cenozoic rocks of the Velebit Mt. (Croatia)... 61 KIRSCHVINK, J.L. (1980): The least-square line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data.– Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 62, 699–718. KISSEL, C., SPERANZA, F. & MILIČEVIĆ, V. (1995): Paleomagne- tism of external southern and central Dinarides and northern Al- banides: implications for the Cenozoic activity of the Scutari–Peć transverse zone.– J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14999–15007. LEWANDOWSKI, M., WERNER, T. & NOWOŻYŃSKI, K. (1997): PDA: a package of FORTRAN programs for paleomagnetic data analysis. Program Manual.– Inst. Geoph., Pol. Acad. Sc., Warsaw, Poland. LEWANDOWSKI, M., KROBICKI, M., MATYJA, B.A. & WIERZ- BOWSKI, A. (2005): Palaeogeographic evolution of the Pieniny Klippen Basin using stratigraphic and paleomagnetic data from the Veliky Kamenets section (Carpathians, Ukraine).– Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 216, 53–72. LOWRIE, W. (1990): Identifi cation of ferromagnetic minerals in a rock by coercivity and unblocking temperature properties.– Geophys. Res. Lett., 17/2, 159–162. MÁRTON, E. & FODOR, L. (2003): Tertiary paleomagnetic results and structural analysis from the Transdanubian Range (Hungary): rotational disintegration of the Alcapa unit.– Tectonophys., 363, 201–224. MÁRTON, E. & MILIČEVIĆ, V. (1994): Tectonically oriented paleo- magnetic investigation in the Dinarids, between Zadar and Split.– Geophys. Transact., 39/4, 227–232. MÁRTON, E. & VELJOVIĆ, D. (1983): Paleomagnetism of the Istria peninsula, Yugoslavia.– Tectonophys., 91, 73–87. MÁRTON, E., DROBNE, K., CIMERMAN, F., ĆOSOVIĆ, V. & KOŠIR, A. (1995): Paleomagnetism of latest Maastrichtian through Oli- gocene Rocks in Istria (Croatia), the Karst Region, and S of the Sava Fault (Slovenia).– First Croatian Geological Congress, Pro- ceedings, Institute of Geology, Zagreb, 2, 355–360. MÁRTON, E., PAVELIĆ, D., TOMLJENOVIĆ, B., PAMIĆ, J. & MÁR- TON, P. (1999): First paleomagnetic results on Tertiary rocks from the Slavonian Mountains in the southern Pannonian Basin, Cro- atia.– Geol. Carpat., 50/3, 273–279. MÁRTON, E., PAVELIĆ, D., TOMLJENOVIĆ, B., AVANIĆ, R., PAMIĆ, J. & MÁRTON, P. (2002): In the wake of a counterclockwise rotat- ing Adriatic microplate: Neogene paleomagnetic results from north- ern Croatia.– Int. J. Earth Sci. 91, 514–523. MÁRTON, E., DROBNE, K., ĆOSOVIĆ, V. & MORO, A. (2003): Pale- omagnetic evidence for Tertiary counterclockwise rotation of Adria.– Tectonophys., 377, 143–156. MÁRTON, E., JELEN, B., TOMLJENOVIĆ, B., PAVELIĆ, D., PO- LJAK, M., MÁRTON, P., AVANIĆ, R. & PAMIĆ, J. (2006): Late Neogene counterclockwise rotation in the SW corner of the Panno- nian Basin.– Geol. Carpat., 57/1, 41–46. MÁRTON, E., ĆOSOVIĆ, V., MORO, A. & ZVOCAK, S. (2008): The motion of Adria during the Late Jurassic and Cretaceous: New paleo- magnetic results from stable Istria.– Tectonophys., 454, 44–53. MAURITSCH, H.J., SCHOLGER, R., BUSHATI, S.L. & RAMIZ, H. (1995): Palaeomagnetic results from southern Albania and their sig- nifi cance for the geodynamic evolution of the Dinarides, Albanides and Hellenides.– Tectonophys., 242, 5–18. MUTTONI, G., ERBA, E., KENT, D.V. & BACHTADSE, V. (2005): Mesozoic Alpine facies deposition as a result of past latitudinal plate motion.– Nature, 434 (7029), 59–63. NEUGEBAUER, J., GREINER, B. & APPEL, E. (2001): Kinematics of the Alpine–West Carpathian orogen and palaeogeographic implica- tions.– J. Geol. Soc. London, 158, 97–110. SATOLLI, S., BESSE, J., SPERANZA, F. & CALAMITA, F. (2007): The 125–150 Ma high-resolution Apparent Polar Wander Path for Adria from magnetostratigraphic sections in Umbria–Marche (Northern Apennines, Italy): Timing and duration of the global Jurassic–Cretaceous hairpin turn.– Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 257, 329–342. STAMPFLI, G.M. & BOREL, G.D. (2002): A plate tectonic model for the Paleozoic and Mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate bound- aries and restored synthetic oceanic isochrones.– Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 196, 17–33. STESKY, R.M. (1995): SpheriStat 2.0. for Windows 3.1. Users Manu- al.– Pangea Scientifi c, Brockville, Ontario, Canada. TARLING, D.H. & HROUDA, F. (1993): The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks.– Chapman & Hall, London, 217 p. TORSVIK, T.H. & SMETHURST, M.A. (1999): Plate tectonic model- ing: virtual reality with GMAP.– Computers & Geosciences, 25, 395–402. VAN DER VOO, R. (1993): Paleomagnetism of the Atlantic, Tethys and Iapetus Oceans.– Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 411 p. VAN DIJK, J.P. & SCHEEPERS, P.J.J. (1995): Neotectonic rotations in the Calabrian Arc: implications for a Pliocene–Recent geodynamic scenario for the Central Mediterranean.– Earth Sci. Rev., 39, 207– 246. VASILIEV, I., BAKRAČ, K., KOVAČIĆ, M., ABDUL AZIZ, H. & KR- IJGSMAN, W. (2007): Palaeomagnetic Results from the Sarmatian/ Pannonian Boundary in North-Eastern Croatia (Vranović Section, Našice Quarry).– Geol. Croat., 60/2, 151–163. VELIĆ, I. (2007): Stratigraphy and palaeobiogeography of Mesozoic benthic foraminifera of the Karst Dinarides (SE Europe).– Geol. Croat., 60/1, 1–113. VELIĆ, I., VLAHOVIĆ, I. & MATIČEC, D. (2002): Depositional se- quences and palaeogeography of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform.– Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 57, 141–151. VLAHOVIĆ, I., TIŠLJAR, J., VELIĆ, I. & MATIČEC, D. (2005): Evo- lution of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform: Palaeogeography, main events and depositional dynamics.– Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 220, 333–360. Manuscript received October 1, 2008 Revised manuscript accepted January 23, 2009