Pikelj.indd 95 �AB STRA CT Granulometric, mineralogical and morphological investigation of the sea-bottom sediments in the Grgur Channel has revealed fi ve sediment types, the most frequent of which are muds containing some amount of coarse fractions (sand and gravel). The coarsest fractions are predominantly composed of recent shell fragments. Unexpected well rounded carbonate gravel was found SE of Prvić Island in 83 m of water. This gravel was presumably transported, shaped and deposited during a sea-level lowstand, by stream and/or in a beach environment. Fine-grained fractions have a silici- clastic composition and suggest a predominant terrigenous origin. One part of the fi ne-grained fraction originates from the recent subaerial weathering of fl ysch outcrops, and the other from previously active (during a lower sea- level), subaerial erosion of presently submerged fl ysch outcrops. As a result of the rapid Late Pleistocene–Holocene transgression, the investigated sediments are now below the present wave-base. Due to a presumed very low or even negligible rate of recent sedimentation in the study area, older sed- iments in the Grgur Channel remain uncovered and bioturbated by burrowing organisms. Therefore, analyzed surface sediments from the Grgur Channel are considered as a mixture of recent and subrecent deposits. From this investigation, a new seabed sediments map of the Grgur Channel was produced, as an improvement on the existing sedimentological map of the Kvarner area. Keywords: Late Pleistocene, Holocene, gravel, depositional environments, Kvarner Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia � Kristina Pikelj1, Višnja Žigić2 and Mladen Juračić1 1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Horvatovac 102a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (kpikelj@geol.pmf.hr; mjuracic@geol.pmf.hr) 2 Prilaz Ivana Visina 7, Siget, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia doi: 10.4154/gc.2009.08 Geologia Croatica 62/2 95–105 8 Figs. 2 Tabs. Zagreb 2009 Geologia CroaticaGeologia Croatica 1. INTRODUCTION Seabed sediments of the Adriatic Sea have been intensively investigated since the 1960s, but the previous studies were spo- radic. Sediments of the northern, middle and western parts of the Adriatic Sea were investigated by Italian and other re- searchers (BRAMBATI & VENZO, 1967; BRAMBATI et al., 1983; BRAMBATI et al., 1988a, b; PIGORINI, 1968; VAN STRAATEN, 1970), while the eastern part remained poorly explored. However, LORENZ (1863) published an initial map of the seabed and surface sediments of the Kvarner region. Further investigation in this region was only resumed more than a century later (ALFIREVIĆ, 1964, 1980; ŠKRIVANIĆ & MAGDALENIĆ, 1979; JURAČIĆ & PRAVDIĆ, 1981; HIJRM, 1985; JURAČIĆ et al., 1997, 1999). The seabed sediment map produced by LORENZ (1863) showed that the Grgur Channel bottom is mostly covered with clay, except for narrow zones along the Prvić, Grgur and Goli Island coastline, where a barren rocky bottom is present and/or covered with angular clasts and pebbles. ALFIREVIĆ (1980) indicated that coarse sandy sediments prevail along the Goli Island coasts; loamy-clayey sediments were registered in the area between Grgur and the Velebit channel, while the Grgur channel remained unexplored. Ac- cording to the general map of the Adriatic Sea seabed sedi- ments (HIJRM, 1985), the Grgur Channel is covered with clayey sands. In the more detailed map of the seabed sedi- ments of the Kvarner region (JURAČIĆ et al., 1999) the Grgur Channel bottom sediments are classifi ed as sandy muds. Geologia Croatica 96 Geologia Croatica 62/2 The sea-fl oor sediment sampling and this study were carried out within a project entitled “Preservation of biodi- versity in Adriatic Sea”, in order to eventually establish a marine park in the Prvić, Grgur and Goli Island area (ZA- VODNIK et al., 2005). The main aim of this paper is to de- termine the pattern and origin of the surface sediment distri- bution, in order that investigation of sediment properties might also enhance the understanding of general sedimenta- tion mechanisms in the channel area of the eastern Adriatic coast under the recent and subrecent climate conditions. An- other purpose of this study is to supply detailed data for a new sediment map of the Kvarner area (and the eastern Adri- atic coast in whole), by publishing a refi ned surface sediment distribution map of the Grgur Channel. 2. STUDY AREA The Prvić, Goli and Grgur Islands belong to the Krk – Rab – Pag island chain that separates Kvarnerić Bay and the Vele- bit – Vinodol Channel within the Kvarner area (Kvarner sensu lato). About 4 km long and 3 km wide, the Grgur Channel is located between the islands of Prvić, Goli and Grgur (Fig. 1). Water depths in the Channel increase abruptly up to 70 m off the coast, and gradually deepen toward the central part (95 m). In the NE and SE part of the Channel, two seafl oor depressions occur (Fig. 1). The maximum depth of the Channel at 107 m occurs in one of these, south of Prvić Island (HHI, 1997). Regarding solid rock geology, the Kvarner area belongs to the NW part of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform (AdCP). It is characterized by predominantly shallow-marine carbon- ate deposits, ranging in age from the Lower Jurassic to the top of the Cretaceous. The end of AdCP shallow marine dep- osition was marked by a regional emergence between the Cretaceous and Palaeogene, but deposition controlled by synsedimentary tectonics continued throughout the Palaeo- gene. Compressional tectonics with maximum stress oriented SW–NE resulted in the fi nal uplift of the Dinarides in the Oligocene/Miocene (VLAHOVIĆ et al., 2005). According to BLAŠKOVIĆ (1999), two main geodynamic phases shaped the Kvarner area: Eocene tectonic movements formed faulted and folded structures, whereas Upper Pliocene tectonics caused their reactivation. Due to the intensive tectonics, up- lifted carbonates were crushed and karstifi ed under subaerial conditions during the Pleistocene. Karstifi cation progressed to a signifi cant depth during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (SURIĆ et al., 2005) when the sea-level was at least 100 m lower than present (CORREGGIARI et al., 1996). Due to the sea-level rise in the post-LGM period, the karst relief was fl ooded and the modern rocky eastern Adriatic coast was formed (BENAC & JURAČIĆ, 1998; SURIĆ et al., 2005). In the investigated area, the data available on the solid rock geology are restricted to outcrops on the islands. As shown in Fig. 2, several stratigraphic members can be dis- tinguished on Prvić, Goli and Grgur: Upper Cretaceous (Ceno- manian–Turonian) limestones with breccias dominate on all islands, Palaeogene deposits are composed of carbonate (Eocene foraminiferal limestones) and clastic sediments (Eocene fl ysh marls with inclusions of sandstone). Eocene foraminiferal limestones, wich transgressively overlie the Upper Cretaceous deposits, are best exposed in the NE and SW parts of Grgur Island, but due to the reverse faulting on Prvić Island, these sediments can only be observed in a nar- row strip in its SW part. Eocene fl ysch (marls and sandstones) were discovered on each of the three islands: on Grgur and Prvić within disturbed synclines and on Goli between two longitudinal faults. The youngest stratigraphic member de- veloped on each of these islands are Eocene breccias and Fi gu re 1: A) Location maps. B) Bathymetric map of the Grgur Channel area. Legend: 1) water depths 0–50 m; 2) water depths 50–100 m; water depths over 100 m; 4) sediment sampling station; 5) sampling depths; (after HHI, 1997). A B Geologia Croatica 97 Pikelj et al.: Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia conglomerates, deposited as a result of erosion of the older (Cretaceous limestones and Eocene fl ysch) sediments (KORO- LIJA & BOROVIĆ, 1966; MAMUŽIĆ & MILAN, 1973). From a general structural point of view, the Grgur and Goli Islands form a faulted fl ank of a syncline, while Prvić is interpreted as a part of an anticline, overturned in the northern-western part of the Island (Fig. 2). According to KOROLIJA & BOROVIĆ (1966) monoclinal layers and re- verse faults confi rm such a structural setting. As shown in Fig. 2 and according to the structural fea- tures, the Grgur Channel is considered to be a submerged part of a syncline with its core composed of Eocene fl ysch. 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 3.1. Sampling and sample preparation Sea-bottom sediment samples investigated in this paper were collected in 1995 during the cruise of the R/V “Vila Vele- bita”. The samples were taken by a Van Veen grab along four transects (at 13 locations) in water depths between 65 and 88 m (Fig. 1). Samples were air-dried and approximately 100 g of each sample were used for analysis. 3.2. Grain-size analysis Grain size composition of the sampled sediments has been determined by wet sieving through an ASTM standard siev- ing set (diameter (d) > 32 μm) on Fritsch Analysette and by a particle coulter Coulter Counter TA II (d < 32 μm). Sedi- ments were then classifi ed according to the internationally accepted classifi cation of sediments (FOLK, 1954). 3.3. Mineralogical analysis The qualitative mineral composition of bulk sediment sam- ples was determined by the Philips X`Pert Pro X-ray diffrac- tometer. Relative mineral abundances were estimated based on the intensity of major peaks. In addition, randomly cho- sen gravelly grains from sample 11 were powdered and ana- lyzed on the same diffractometer. The amount of carbonates was determined by gas volumetry (JOBSTRAIBIZER, 1970). 3.4. Grain-shape analysis Each fraction of the sediment samples was examined with a binocular microscope. Grain morphology analysis was car- ried out only on the gravelly fraction of sample 11 (see dis- cussion in 4.3). Pebbles were counted and weighed, and short (S), intermediate (I) and long (L) axes of clasts were determined, using a slide caliper. According to I/L and S/I ratio, the shape of each clast was categorized into sphere, rod, disc and blade, using the Zingg classifi cation (ZINGG, 1935). Roundness and sphericity of the grains were deter- mined using a visual comparative graphic chart (GRAHAM, 1988; TUCKER, 2003). Aditionally, the degree of grain fl at- ness (fl atness index) was calculated from the L, I and S ratio, using the formula: F= L+I/2S (MÜLLER, 1967). Fi gu re 2: Geological map and cross-section of the Grgur Channel area. Legend: 1) Quaternary in general; 2) Palaeogene and Neogene carbonate breccias; 3) Eocene fl ysch marls and sandstones; 4) Eocene foraminiferal limestones; 5) Upper Cretaceous limestones, lime- stones with dolomite intercalations and lime- stones with breccias; 6) Upper Cretaceous dolo- mites and dolomite breccias; 7) Lower Cretaceous limestones and breccias; 8) Upper Jurassic layered limestones with dolomites; 9) Upper Jurassic bre- ccias and limestones with dolomites; 10) Middle Jurassic massive limestones; a) Transgressive con- tact; b) Normal contact; c) Fault without its char- acter; d) Presumed fault; e) Reverse fault; (simpli- fi ed after KOROLIJA & BOROVIĆ, 1966; MAMUŽIĆ et al., 1969; MAMUŽIĆ & MILAN, 1973). Geologia Croatica 98 Geologia Croatica 62/2 3.5. Micropalaeontological analysis Pebbles for micropalaeontological analysis of the gravelly fraction in sample 11 were randomly chosen and used for preparation of thin sections in order to defi ne the rock type according to DUNHAM (1962). 4. RESULTS 4.1. Grain-size analysis Results of grain size analysis of sediments from the Grgur Channel showed a mean grain size between 12 and 70 μm with predominance of the mud fraction (silt + clay) 44–92 % (Table 1). Sediments were classifi ed according to FOLK (1954) into fi ve sediment types: mud (M–8, 12), sandy mud (sM–2, 5, 7), slightly gravelly sandy mud ((g)sM–4, 6, 9, 10, 13), slightly gravely muddy sand ((g)mS–1, 3) and gravelly mud (gM–11) as shown on Fig. 3A. The map (originally at the scale of 1:100000, Fig. 3B) shows an almost symmetri- cal distribution of sediment types in the Channel regarding its elongate shape. 4.2. Mineralogical analysis The analyzed sediments have a similar mineralogical com- position, which is a mixture of carbonaceous and alumino- silicate components including quartz. The total content of Table 1: Summary results of the grain size and mineralogical analyses* Sample Sampling depth (m) Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Mz (μm) So Carbonates (%) Non-carbonate minerals Sediment type (Folk, 1954) 1 84 0.8 51.3 44.8 3.1 50.7 2.13 55.6 Q, Ms, Chl slightly gravely muddy sand 2 88 0.0 37.6 58.8 3.6 31.9 1.53 ND** ND** sandy mud 3 86 0.9 55.4 42.7 1.0 71.7 1.98 55.6 Q, Ms slightly gravely muddy sand 4 73 1.0 45.1 44.0 9.9 44.1 2.53 70.5 Q, Chl, Ms slightly gravelly sandy mud 5 86 0.0 11.4 70.8 17.8 12.1 1.81 54.5 Q, Chl, Ms sandy mud 6 65 1.1 27.5 62.0 9.4 32.5 3.40 52.3 Q, Ms, Kln, Ill, Pl slightly gravelly sandy mud 7 75 0.0 38.8 49.5 11.7 27.5 2.37 59.0 Q, Chl, Ms sandy mud 8 82 0.0 8.7 74.4 16.9 12.1 1.71 54.5 Q, Chl, Ms, Pl mud 9 79 2.7 11.9 74.2 11.2 15.6 1.71 50.0 Q, Ms, Chl, Ill slightly gravelly sandy mud 10 78 3.2 31.2 53.9 11.7 20.7 2.33 50.0 Q, Chl, Ms, Ill slightly gravelly sandy mud 11 83 14.3 22.2 46.6 16.9 44.5 3.99 52.3 Q, Chl, Ms gravelly mud 12 88 0.0 8.2 80.1 11.7 12.6 1.48 43.2 Q, Chl, Ms, Ill mud 13 86 0.4 25.8 57.5 16.3 18.4 2.31 56.8 Q, Ms, Ill slightly gravelly sandy mud * Mineral abbreviations: Chl – chlorite, Ill – illite, Kln – kaolinite, Ms – muscovite, Pl – plagioclase, Q – quartz. ** ND: not determined Fi gu re 3: A) Folk (1954) diagram of the percentage of gravel, sand and mud with sediment types present on the seabed of the Grgur Channel (abbreviations explained in the text); B) Surface sediment map of Grgur Channel, bar scale: 1) isobath 50 m; 2) isobath 100 m; 3) sediment sampling station; 4) sampling depths (after HHI, 1997). B A Geologia Croatica 99 Pikelj et al.: Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia carbonate minerals varied between 43.2 % (sample 12) and 70.5 % (sample 4), averaging 54.5 % (Table 1). All samples contained calcite, (as the most abundant mineral), Mg-cal- cite and aragonite, mostly deriving from shell fragments. The second major mineral was quartz, the amount of which increased in the central part of the Channel (samples 2, 5, 8, and 12). Secondary minerals occurring within the sediments were dolomite, chlorite, muscovite and/or illite, while traces of plagioclase and kaolinite were also found. Results of the X-ray analysis of the gravel fraction in the sample 11 revealed that all analyzed grains only con- tained calcite. 4.3. Grain-shape analysis Sand and gravel in all of the samples consisted of various biogenous remains, except for the two coarsest (2–4 mm, >4 mm) fractions in sample 11, which contained only rock frag- ments. Because of this unusual fi nding, grain-shape analysis was only carried out for those fractions. The gravel fraction of sample 11 amounted to 14.3 % by weight and 89 grains were counted. Figure 4 shows a Zingg diagram of grain shapes (ZINGG, 1935). Almost half of the grains fell in the disc fi eld (47.2 %). Spheroids were represented by 20.2 %, rods by 19.1 % and blades by 8.9 %. A small percentage of the grains (4.4 %) had boundary values: 3.3 % between discs and spheres and 1.1 % between discs and blades. Summary results of grain roundness and grain fl atness are presented in Table 2. Most of the grains were rounded (32.6 % well-rounded, 24.7 % rounded and 25.8 % sub-rounded). The fl atness index (MÜLLER, 1967) ranged between 1.09 and 5. In Table 2 measured fl atness indices were divided into three groups: < 1.6, 1.6–2 and > 2 %). 4.4. Micropalaeontological analysis Microfossil assemblages from the examined limestone peb- bles indicated an age range from the Lower Cretaceous to Middle Eocene. Fossil remains of Pseudonummoloculina au- rigerica CALVEZ (Fig. 5A) discoverd in a peloidal-miliolidal grainstone, indicate the Lower Cretaceous (Late Aptian–Early Albian). Fragments of algae Thaumatoporella parvovesicu- lifera RAINIER in several different grains indicate a wider stratigraphic range (Upper Triassic to Palaeogene). However, together with the benthic foraminifera Pseudolituonella reicheli MARIE and fragments of Broeckina (P.) balcanica CHERCHI et al. in peloidal wackestone (Fig. 5B), this indi- cates a Middle Cenomanian age. Grains of peletal foraminif- eral wackestone containing Alveolina sp., Chrysalidina sp., Orbitolites sp. and Triloculina sp. (Fig. 5C) confi rmed their Eocene age. In a few rounded and well-rounded pebbles from the gravelly fraction of sample 11, polychaete and anthozoan remnants were found (Fig. 6A and 6B). Being poorly pre- served, determination of the polychaete species was not pos- sible. Remains of the anthozoa, (also deeply weathered), be- long to the juvenile form of the solitary coral Balanophyllia europaea RISSO (Fig. 6B and 6C) (P. KRUŽIĆ, 2006, per- sonal communication). 5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Seabed sediment distribution The distribution of sediment types in the Channel is sym- metrical along the Channel (Figs. 3 and 7). Sediments from the central part of the Channel contain the largest amount of mud (samples 5, 8 and 12; > 88 %). Peaks of the muddy modes lay in the fi ne silt fraction (~8 μm, except for sample 3 occuring at 16 μm) (Fig. 7). The proportion of the coarse fractions increases westward and shoreward in the Channel. The sandy fraction content of the samples ranges between 8 and 55 % with the modal peak occurring mostly at 63 μm. Fi gu re 4: Zingg diagram of grain shape for the gravelly fraction of sample 11, according to intermediate (I)/ long (L) and short (S)/ intermediate (I) axes ratios; (after ZINGG, 1935). Table 2: Summary results of the grain shape analysis ROUNDNESS: % Very angular 4.5 Angular 3.4 Subangular 9.0 Subrounded 25.8 Rounded 24.7 Well-rounded 32.6 SPHERICITY: % High 23.6 Low 76.4 AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE FLATNESS: % < 1.6 27.0 1.6–2 29.2 > 2 43.8 Geologia Croatica 100 Geologia Croatica 62/2 Samples 2, 5, 7 contain more sand than previous ones and were classifi ed as sandy muds, while samples 4, 6, 9, 10, 13 were classifi ed as slightly gravelly-sandy mud, also contain- ing a slightly increased gravel fraction. The highest precent- age of sand (> 50%) was found in samples 1 and 3, classifi ed as slightly gravelly muddy sand (Fig. 3). The gravel content of the investigated samples is low (0–3.2 %), except for sam- ple 11 (14.3 %). Visual inspection of this fraction revealed differences between the biogenic origin of this fraction in most of the samples and the terrigenous origin of the gravel fraction in sample 11, as discussed below. Poor and very poor sorting (Table 1), together with no- ticeable bimodal and polimodal frequency curves, respec- tively, (Fig. 7) indicate that all of the analyzed sediment sam- Fi gu re 5: A) Aptian–Albian limestone with Pseudonummoloculina auriger- ica CALVEZ; B) Cenomanian assemblage of Pseudolituonella reicheli MARIE (fragment in oval) and Broeckina (P.) balcanica CHERCHI et al. (fragments in circles); C) Eocene foraminiferal limestone with (from left to right) Trilocu- lina sp., Chrysalidina sp., Orbitolites sp. and Alveolina sp. (fragments). Fi gu re 6: A) Gravel grain with remains of a polychaete; B) Gravel grain with remains of an anthozoan, Balanophyllia europaea (Risso); C) Balanophyllia europaea (Risso), SEM, BSE. A B C A B C Geologia Croatica 101 Pikelj et al.: Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia ples are mixtures of mud with coarser fractions (sand and gravel) in different proportions. These results mainly con- fi rmed the previous characterization of the Grgur Channel bottom sediments as sandy muds (JURAČIĆ et al., 1999). Greater distinction between the sediment types has addition- ally refi ned the existing seabed sediment map (Fig. 3). 5.2. Origin of sediments The pronounced bimodal or polymodal distribution and poor sorting (Table 1, Fig. 7), indicate the various origins of par- ticles found in sediments. Aditionally, nearly equal propor- tions of carbonate and siliciclastic fractions suggests differ- ent sources of particles. The main thesis arising from these results is that the seabed sediment contains particles of bio- genic and terrigenous origin, suggesting the possibility of different times of deposition. The analyzed sediments, with sampling depths between 65 and 88 m, are below the present wave base. An absolute maximum wave height in the Adriatic recorded during the longlasting southeastern wind Jugo, (or Scirocco in Italian), in the open northern Adriatic was Hmax = 10.8 m and the av- erage wave length was Lav = 112.3 m (HHI, 1999). Thus, the deepest wave base in the open Adriatic is of the order of 50 m. Since the study area is protected by the southern and ex- ternal islands (Fig. 1A), the wave base here is signifi cantly shallower. Therefore, at the investigated sea depths, only fi ne-grained terrigenous particles should be expected. How- ever, the results of both granulometric and mineralogical analysis have shown that, as already emphasized, all of ana- lyzed samples have a bimodal/polymodal distribution (Fig. 7) and are mixtures of carbonaceous and siliciclastic mate- rial to different extents (Table 1). 5.2.1. Fine-grained fraction The fi ne-grained fraction of the analyzed sediments (< 63 μm) contains aluminosilicate minerals. Quartz, as the second ma- jor mineral present, together with muscovite and/or illite, plagioclase and kaolinite, indicates a terrigenous source. Such a mineral composition of the fi ne grained fraction is similar to the composition of fl ysch deposits of central Istria and the Kvarner Littoral area (with various percentages of carbonates, quartz as the main component and plagioclase, illite, chlorite and montmorilonite as secondary components) (MAGDALENIĆ, 1972). Moreover, some beach sands on Rab Island have been recognised as material supplied by weathering of siliciclastic Eocene sandstones in the nearby hinterland (LUŽAR-OBERITER et al., 2008), while similar mineral assemblages, belonging to the Kvarner Province, can be found in the bottom sediments of the Velebit Chan- nel, Rijeka Bay, northern parts of Kvarner and the Kvarnerić Channel (ŠKRIVANIĆ & MAGDALENIĆ, 1979). Eocene fl ysch outcrops (marls and sandstones), exposed to present subaerial weathering that could contribute to sediment sup- ply in the Channel occur only on Prvić Island. This fl ysch might be the source of part of the aluminosilicate minerals present (Fig. 2). These outcrops are both scarce and presum- ably too small to be the main source of the siliciclastic com- ponent of the sea-bed sediments. A possible major source of this component could have been the seabed of the Channel itself. MAMUŽIĆ et al. (1969) interpreted the Channel as the submerged part of a syncline, composed of Eocene fl ysch sediment. During the lower sea-level, specifi cally during the last glacial period, most of the presently submerged parts of the Channel were dry land (Fig. 8) (BENAC & JURAČIĆ, 1998). Such exposed fl ysch bedrock could have been weath- Fi gu re 7: Grain-size frequency distribution of sediment samples in the Grgur Channel. Geologia Croatica 102 Geologia Croatica 62/2 ered under subaerial conditions. With the onset of the rapid Holocene transgression, this weathered non-lithifi ed fl ysch debris probably remained on the bottom of the infi lled Chan- nel. 5.2.2. Sand and gravel fractions The coarser-grained fraction (> 63 μm) of the sediment sam- ples contained large amount of skeletons, shells and frag- ments of different marine organisms. Thereby, the major part of the carbonate fraction (including calcite, Mg-calcite and aragonite) is of biogenic origin. Most of skeletal remains are sand sized (63 μm–2 mm), while a minor part is determined as gravel (> 2 mm). Since these particles are of biogenic orig in, their size is a result of the original skeletal size and some degree of fragmentation. Considering the predominant carbonate lithology of the mainland and the islands in the investigated area, (which is more prone to chemical weathering/karstifi cation), the actual terrigenous input into the investigated area was pressumed to be low (BENAC & JURAČIĆ, 1998). However, dolomite determined as a secondary mineral in the sandy fractions, confi rmes the terrigenous origin of part of the carbonate frac- tion. Grgur Channel coasts (Fig. 2) are exposed to marine erosion (BENAC, 1992), especially due to waves generated by the Jugo. Such abrasion could produce small amount of sand-sized particles. Unlike other samples, sample 11, collected from a depth of 83 m, shows an intriguingly high proportion of gravel (14.3 %). This gravelly fraction is composed only of rock granules and very fi ne pebbles, whereas bioclastic particles are absent. Referring to the afore-mentioned hydrodynamic setting, the gravelly part of this sediment is obviously not in accordance with the present depositional environment. In order to determine the depositional conditions of this gravel, pebbles were morphologically analyzed. The shape of sedi- mentary particles is a complex property, depending on many factors (initial mineralogy, weathering degree, transport abra- sion degree, transport distance, fl uid energy etc). Weathering of rocks of homogenous texture produces spherical, discoi- dal and isometric grains (TIŠLJAR, 2004). Within the ana- lyzed pebbles, 47.2 % were discs and 20.2 % were spheres (Fig. 4), suggesting high transport energy and/or noticeable transport length. X-ray analysis showed that all of the peb- bles are composed of calcite and micropalaeontological analy- sis showed that the gravel source rocks are limestones hav- ing age ranges from the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian) to Middle Eocene. These source rocks are well stratifi ed (MAMUŽIĆ & MILAN, 1973). If weathered, stratifi ed lime- stone produces tabular grains, which results in the dominance of discs. Thereby, high fl atness indices (> 40 % of the ana- lyzed grains) could be attributed to the structure of a source rock. Therefore, we presume that the high percentage of discs in the gravel fraction is controlled by the structure of the source rocks. Besides the grain shape, grain roundness also confi rms a considerable transport distance and/or high trans- port energy: over 80 % of pebbles are sub rounded, rounded and well rounded (Table 2). Some of the grains, from Upper Cretaceous and Middle Eocene limestones could be transported from adjacent so- urces. Since Lower Cretaceous sediments do not crop out on the surrounding islands (Fig 2.), part of the gravel was prob- ably transported from more distant sources. One possible transport direction could be from the Velebit Channel toward the Grgur Channel (Fig. 8), since, according to MAMUŽIĆ et al. (1969), Lower Cretaceous deposits oucrop in part of the Velebit Channel seabed (Fig. 2). Erosion of those depos- its caused by a palaeostream could produce gravelly material during a low sea-level stand, supplying the studied location with gravelly material. During the lower sea level, coastlines were shifted away from the recent ones and brackish and/or freshwater lakes could have been formed in deeper and isolated parts of the Kvarner area (Fig. 8). If gravel was brought and deposited by the palaeofl ow near the former coastline, it could be fur- ther shaped as beach sediment. Therefore, gravelly sediment Fi gu re 8: Morphological evolution of the Kvarner area during the last gla- cial period. Legend: 1) position of the marine basin; 2) position of periodic lakes; 3) position of palaeofl ows; 4) continuous connection with the marine basin in the Middle Adriatic; 5) periodically connected with the marine ba- sin; 6) intensive recent sedimentation; (after BENAC & JURAČIĆ, 1998). Geologia Croatica 103 Pikelj et al.: Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia could be expected to extend along the former palaeofl ow and/or coastline. Similar discoveries of gravel (cobbles) at 155 m depth in the Black Sea were also interpreted as an an- cient lake shoreline (BALLARD et al., 2000). The discovery of biological owergrowths on the pebbles indicates sea-level change. Balanophyllia europea (RISSO) (B. italica MICHELIN), found attached to gravel, is a soli- tary, ahermatypic zooaxantellate scleractinian coral, about 25 mm high. It lives mostly on a rocky substratum and rarely on a sandy substratum and mollusc shells, and it is well known in the Mediterranean Sea and in some parts of the Atlantic Ocean (ZIBROWIUS, 1980; ZAVODNIK & ŠIMU- NOVIĆ, 1997). It has inhabited the wider Mediterranean area since the Miocene (CHAIX & CAHUZAC, 2005). Its depth distribution seems to be restricted due to its symbiosis with zooxantellae; it is found at a maximum depth of 50 m (ZIBROWIUS, 1980). In the Adriatic Sea it inhabits depths between 3 and 50 m (ZAVODNIK & ŠIMUNOVIĆ, 1997). The high degree of roundness (rounded and well-rounded grains, Fig. 6) of the gravel on which the coral was found indicates that transport and/or reshaping processes must have occurred before the coral grew. Therefore, the coral was probably attached while the depth of the seabed was suitable for its colonization (between 3 and 50 m). Due to sea-level rise, grains with coral remains fi nally ended up below the depth suitable for coral colonisation. Preservation of the at- tached coral′s theca proves that the pebbles were not further reworked. 5.3. General setting of the depositional environment in the Grgur Channel The presence of well rounded carbonate gravel, the general composition and bimodality/polimodality of the frequency curves of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel is consid- ered as a good example of the documented change of depo- sitional environment and sediment sources. The Late Pleis- tocene–Holocene transgression is accepted as a reason for the change in depositional conditions. The Grgur Channel, as with other channels in the wider area along the Croatian portion of the eastern Adriatic coast, was presumably formed along the bottom of a syncline, as described in section 2 (Fig 2). The investigated area belongs to the Northern Dalmatic Province (NDP) (GIORGETTI & MOSETTI, 1969) – an insular area with water depths in channels up to 125 m, infl uenced by sea-level changes dur- ing the Pleistocene. During the lower sea-level periods, parts of channels in the Kvarner area were probably emergent. At the same time the outer longitudinal island chain kept the inner NDP basins out of Po River dominated continental ter- rigenous sedimentation, typical for the northern Adriatic shelf during Pleistocene sea-level lowstands (BENAC & JURAČIĆ, 1998). According to these conditions, the Grgur Channel as well as deeper parts of the Kvarner (Kvarnerić Bay, Vinodol Channel, Velebit Channel) probably remained protected from infi lling with terrigenous sediments from the west, whilst some other parts of the Grgur Channel could have been dry land (Fig. 8). Exposure of its fl ysch dominated fl anks to subaerial conditions presumably produced substan- tial amount of debris. Onset of a global sea level rise caused by rapid ice decay at the end of the MIS 2 (LAMBECK et al., 2002), caused the depositional areas and coastlines to rapidly shift towards the recent ones. The formerly deposited sediment remained on the seabed surface and recent sedimentation has only partially covered it. The sediment is further mixed by bioturbation. De- fi cient recent sedimentation within the NDP is also noted in palaeontological investigations, after the discovery of fossil elephant skeletal remains on the sea-bottom between Rab and Laganj Islands (approximately 5 km south of Rab Island, black dot in Fig. 1A) (MALEZ & LENARDIĆ-FABIĆ, 1988). Re- mains of Mammuthus meridionalis adriaticus n. ssp. were found at a depth of 80 m below present sea-level, in sediment that authors have called “ancient sands”. The age of this fossil elephant was placed in the Mindel glacial (MIS 12–14?, LOWE & WALKER, 1997), indicating several emersions of this area, caused by sea-level fl uctuations during the Pleistocene. Hence, negligible recent sedimentation in the Channel is evident and resulted in thin recent sediment cover. Bio- logical effects throughout interaction with the substrate (bio- turbation processes) probably helped in generating various mixtures of recent and subrecent sediment. Bimodal or poly- modal grain size distributions are a result and further proof of this mixing (Fig. 7). For a detailed identifi cation of the thickness of individual sediment layers (if existing) at par- ticular locations, a different sampling procedure (gravity corer, box corer) is required, since the grab sampling could further mix the sediment. Investigations conducted on the surface sediment cover have revealed complex depositional mechanisms in the Grgur Channel, markedly conditioned by the last sea-level change. Furthermore, it suggests similar depositional patterns in the channel area of the eastern Adriatic coast, where similar ge- ological settings also occur. However, every channel tends to have specifi c oceanographic characteristics, due to the complicated orography and geometry (ORLIĆ, 2001), which certainly alters the fi nal distribution of sediment types. Nev- ertheless, these results are in accordance with the distribu- tion of sediment types in other parts of the Kvarner region. Diversity of sediment types in the Grgur Channel certainly contributes to the high biodiversity of the bottom communi- ties indentifi ed by ZAVODNIK et al. (2005), which is an important factor for protecting the Grgur Channel area as a marine park. Moreover, the Channel seabed requires further investigation. In order to gain more precise information on the sediment cover and changes in sedimentation during the subrecent geological past, marine seismic techniques and sub-bottom profi ling could be used. 6. CONCLUSIONS Analyzed sediments of the Grgur Channel were sampled in the quiet depositional environment, below the present wave base. Distribution of sediment types is symmetrical along Geologia Croatica 104 Geologia Croatica 62/2 the Channel. Common characteristics of all analysed sedi- ment samples are bimodality/polymodality of the grain size frequency curves and a combined carbonate-siliciclastic mi- neral composition, suggesting different sources, transport mechanisms and times of deposition. The Late Pleistocene– Holocene transgression is considered as a main reason for changes in the depositional conditions. The fi nest fraction is most abundant in sediment from the central part of the Channel and is mostly in accordance with recent depositional conditions. The other parts of the Channel seabed are covered with a mixture of fi ne and coarse grained particles that are only partially of recent origin. The most conspicuous characteristic of sediments is the unusual fi nding of well rounded carbonate gravel at a depth of 83 m, characterized as fl uvial and possibly beach sediment. This mixture of recent and subrecent sediment particles is prob- ably due to bioturbation. Thus, the analyzed sediments could be defi ned as a mixture of recent and subrecent, carbona- ceous and siliceous, as well as mixture of biogenic and ter- rigenous particles. Results of analyses of seabed sediments from the Grgur Channel are in line with the previous sediment investigation. They also indicate the complex origin of the seabed sediment cover in the channel area of the eastern Adriatic coast. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work was funded by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of project no. 119-1191152-1169, “Recent sediments and fos- sil environment of the Adriatic littoral”. The authors are grateful to Blanka CVETKO-TEŠOVIĆ for assistance in micropalaeontological analy sis, to Petar KRUŽIĆ for coral determination, and to Robert KOŠĆAL for drawings. We thank Paolo COLANTONI and Josip TIŠLJAR for their critical reviews which improved the early version of the manuscript. REFERENCES ALFIREVIĆ, S. (1964): Sedimentološki pokrov kanalskog područja Jadrana i faktori koji uplivaju na njegovo formiranje [Sediment cov- er of Adriatic channel area and factors that infl uence its formation – in Croatian].– Acta Adriat., 11/1, 9–17. ALFIREVIĆ, S. (1980): Sedimentološko kartiranje bentoskih biocenoza u kanalima sjeveroistočnog Jadrana [Sedimentological mapping of benthos biocenoses in the channels of the NE Adriatic Sea – in Croatian].– Geol. vjesnik, 32, 15–32. BALLARD, R.D., COLEMAN, D.F. & ROSENBERG, G.D. (2000): Further evidence of abrupt Holocene drowning of the Black Sea shelf.– Mar. Geol., 170, 253–261. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(00) 00108-0 BENAC, Č. (1992): Recentni geomorfološki procesi i oblici u području Riječkog zaljeva [The recent geomorphological processes in the area of the Rijeka Bay – in Croatian].– Geogr. Glas., 54, 1–18. BENAC, Č. & JURAČIĆ, M. (1998): Geomorphological indicators of the sea level changes during Upper Pleistocene (Würm) and Holocene in the Kvarner region (NE Adriatic Sea).– Acta Geogr. Croat., 33, 27–45. BLAŠKOVIĆ, I. (1999): Tectonics of part of the Vinodol Valley within the model of the continental crust subduction.– Geol. Croat., 52/2, 153–189. BRAMBATI, A. & VENZO, G.A. (1967): Recent sedimentation in the Northern Adriatic Sea between Venice and Trieste.– Studi Trentini. Sci. Nat., 44, 202–274. BRAMBATI, A., CIABATTI, M., FANZUTTI, G.P., MARABINI, F. & MAROCCO, R. (1983): A new sedimentological textural map of the Northern and central Adriatic Sea.– Boll. Ocean. Teor. Appl., 1/4, 267–271. BRAMBATI, A., CIABATTI, M., FANZUTTI, G.P., MARABINI, F. & MAROCCO, R. (1988a): Carta sedimentologica dell’ Adriatico cen- trale, 1:250000.– Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche. BRAMBATI, A., CIABATTI, M., FANZUTTI, G.P., MARABINI, F. & MAROCCO, R. (1988b): Carta sedimentologica dell’ Adriatico centrale, 1:250000.– Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche. CHAIX, C. & CAHUZAC, B. (2005): Les faunes de Scléractiniaires dans les faluns du Miocčne moyen d’Atlantique-Est (bassins de la Loire et d’Aquitaine): paléobiogéographie et évolution climatique [The faunas of Scleractinian corals in the faluns of the Eastern Atlantic Middle Miocene (Loire and Aquitaine Basins): paleobio- geography and climatic evolution – in Italian].– Ann. Paléont., 91, 33–72. CORREGGIARI, A., ROVERI, M. & TRINCARDI, F. (1996): Late Pleistocene and Holocene evolution of the north Adriatic Sea.– Il Quaternario – Ital. J. Quat. Sci., 9/2, 697–704. DUNHAM, R.J. (1962): Classifi cation of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures.– In: HAM, W.E. (ed): Classifi cation of car- bonate rocks. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Mem., 1, 108–121. FOLK, R.L. (1954): The distinction between grain size and mineral com- position in sedimentary rock nomenclature.– J. Geol., 62, 344–356. GIORGETTI, F. & MOSETTI, F. (1969): General morphology of the Adriatic Sea.– Boll. Geofi s. Teor. Appl., 11, 49–56. GRAHAM, J. (1988): Collection and analysis of fi eld data. In: TUCKER, M.E. (ed.): Techniques in sedimentology. Blackwell Scientifi c Publications, Suffolk, 5–63. HHI (1997): Coastal chart Krk – Rab MK7, Scale 1:100000.– Hrvatski hidrografski institut, Split. HHI (1999): Peljar I. Jadransko more – istočna obala [Nautical pilot I. Adriatic Sea – eastern coast – in Croatian].– Hrvatski hidrografski institut, Split, 331 p.+D 32. HIJRM (1985): Jadransko more – generalna karta sedimenata dna [Adri- atic Sea – general map of the seabed sediments – in Croatian], 1: 1.000000.– Hidrografski institut Jugoslavenske ratne morna- rice, Split. JURAČIĆ, M. & PRAVDIĆ, V. (1981): Geochemical and physicochem- ical studies on sediments of Rijeka Bay: the properties of sediments as depositories of pollutants.– Thalassia Jugosl., 17/3–4, 339–349. JURAČIĆ, M., CRMARIĆ, R. & BENAC, Č. (1997): Holocenski sedi- menti i sedimentacija u Riječkom zaljevu [Holocene sediments and sedimentation in the Rijeka Bay – in Croatian].– In: ARKO-PIJE- VAC, M., KOVAČIĆ, M., CRNKOVIĆ, D. (eds.): Prirodoslovna istraživanja riječkog područja. Prirodoslovna biblioteka 1, Priro- doslovni muzej Rijeka, 339–344. JURAČIĆ, M., BENAC, Č. & CRMARIĆ, R. (1999): Seabed and sur- face sediment map of the Kvarner region, Adriatic Sea, Croatia (Lithological Map, 1: 500000).– Geol. Croat., 52/2, 131–140. JOBSTRAIBIZER, P.G. (1970): Determinazione rapida di calcite e do- lomite per via gas-volumetrica nei sedimenti.– Boll. Soc. Geol. It., 89, 401–413. KOROLIJA, B. & BOROVIĆ, I. (1966): Geology of the isles Grgur, Prvić and Goli otok.– Bull. Scient. Acad. RSF Yougoslavie, 1–2, 2–3, Zagreb. LAMBECK, K., ESAT, T. & POTTER, E.K. (2002): Links between cli- mate and sea level for the past three milion years.– Nature, 419, 199–206. LORENZ, J.R. (1863): Physicalische Verhältnisse und Vertheilung der Organismen im Quarnerischen Golfe.– Kais. Kön. Hof- und Staats- druckerei, Wien, 379 p. Geologia Croatica 105 Pikelj et al.: Origin and distribution of surface sediments in the Grgur Channel, Adriatic Sea, Croatia LOWE, J.J. & WALKER, M.J.C. (1997): Reconstructing Qaternary En- vironments (2nd edition).– Prentice Hall, 446 p. LUŽAR-OBERITER, B., MIKULČIĆ PAVLAKOVIĆ, S., CRNJA- KOVIĆ, M. & BABIĆ, LJ. (2008): Variable sources of beach sands of north Adriatic islands: examples from Rab and Susak.– Geol. Croat., 61/2–3, 379–384. MAGDALENIĆ, Z. (1972): Sedimentologija fl iških naslaga srednje Is- tre [Sedimentology of Central Istria fl ysch deposits – in Croatian].– Acta Geol., 7/2, 71–96. MALEZ, M. & LENARDIĆ-FABIĆ, J. (1988): New subspecies of the southern elephant (Mammuthus meridionalis adriaticus n.ssp.) from the bottom of the Adriatic Sea (Croatia, Yugoslavia).– Paleont. Jugosl., 37, 1–36. MAMUŽIĆ, P., MILAN, A., KOROLIJA, B., BOROVIĆ, I. & MAJ- CEN, Ž. (1969): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100.000, list Rab, L 33–144 [Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1:100000, Rab sheet – in Croatian].– Institut za geološka istraživanja Zagreb, Savezni geološki zavod, Beo grad. MAMUŽIĆ, P. & MILAN, A. (1973): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100000. Tumač za list Rab L33–44 [Basic Geological Map of 1:100000, Geology of the Rab sheet – in Croatian].– Institut za geo loška istraživanja Zagreb, Savezni geološki zavod, Beo grad, 39 p. MÜLLER, G. (1967): Methods in Sedimentary Petrology. Sedimentary Petrology, Part I.– Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 283 p. ORLIĆ, M. (2001): Croatian Coastal Waters.– In: CUSHMAN-ROISIN, M. B. et al. (eds): Physical Oceanography of the Adriatic Sea, Klu- wer, Dordrecht, 189–214. PIGORINI, B. (1968): Sources and dispersion of recent sediments of the Adriatic Sea.– Mar. Geol., 6/3, 187–229. SURIĆ, M., JURAČIĆ, M., HORVATINČIĆ, N. & KRAJCAR BRONIĆ, I. (2005): Late Pleistocene–Holocene sea-level rise and the pat- tern of coastal karst inundation: records from submerged speleo- themes along the Eastern Adriatic Coast (Croatia).– Mar. Geol., 214, 163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.030 ŠKRIVANIĆ, A. & MAGDALENIĆ, Z. (1979): Cruises of the research vessel “Vila Velebita” in the Kvarner region of the Adriatic Sea. IX. Quaternary sea bottom sediments.– Thalassia Jugosl., 15, 149–166. TIŠLJAR, J. (2004): Sedimentologija klastičnih i silicijskih taložina. [Sedimentology of clastic and siliceous deposits – in Croatian].– In- stitut za geološka istraživanja, Zagreb, 426 p. TUCKER, M.E. (2003): Sedimentary rocks in the fi eld.– John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 234 p. VAN STRAATEN, L.M.J.U. (1970): Holocene and Late Pleistocene sed- imentation in the Adriatic Sea.– Geol. Rund., 60, 106–131. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.030 VLAHOVIĆ, I., TIŠLJAR, J., VELIĆ, I. & MATIČEC, D. (2005): Evo- lution of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform: Palaeography, main events and depositional dynamics.– Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 220, 333–360. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.01.011 ZAVODNIK, D. & ŠIMUNOVIĆ, A. (1997): Beskralješnjaci morskog dna Jadrana [Invertebrates of the Adriatic sea-bed – in Croatian].– IP Svjetlost D.D., Sarajevo, 217 p. ZAVODNIK, D., PALLAORO, A., JAKLIN, A., KOVAČIĆ, M. & ARKO-PIJEVAC, M. (2005): A benthos survey of the Senj Archi- pelago (North Adriatic Sea, Croatia).– Acta Adriat., 46/2, 3–68. ZIBROWIUS, H. (1980): Les scléractiniaires de la Méditerraée et de l΄Atlantique nord-oriental.– Mém. Inst. Océanogr., Monaco, 11, 1–284. ZINGG, T. (1935): Beitrage zur Schotteranalyse.– Min. Petrog. Mitt. Schweiz., 15, 39–140. Manuscript received May 15, 2008 Revised manuscript accepted April 23, 2009 Available online June 19, 2009