02-faris.indd Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt 139 � AB STRA CT Integration of the calcareous nannofossil and planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphies has been performed for the Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions at Gebel Umm Khushayb and west El-Hassana sections (north-central Sinai, Egypt). The studied successions include the uppermost part of the Sudr, Dakhla, and Tarawan formations and their lateral coeval Beida Formation. Biostratigraphic analysis has allowed recognition from Zone CF2 to Zone P4 in terms of planktonic foraminifera and from Zone CC26c to Zone NP7/8 in terms of calcareous nannofossils. The Maastrichtian/Palaeogene (K/Pg) boundary is characterized by an erosional surface that marks a hiatus between the Sudr/Dakhla or Sudr/Beida formation boundaries, as confi rmed by the absence of the planktonic foraminiferal CF1 to P1a zones and their equivalent nannofossil zones (top part of CC26c to lowest part of Zone NP3). The Danian/ Selandian (Da/Se) boundary lies in the upper part of the Dakhla Formation within the top of nannofossil Zone NP4, and within planktonic foraminiferal Zone P3b, similar to that of the Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the D/S boundary which has recently been chosen at the Zumaia section, northern Spain. A minor hiatus was observed across the Selandian/Thanetian boundary as indicated by a lithological change and a very condensed Zone NP6, corresponding to the Dakhla and Tarawan formation boundary in the west El-Hassana section. Keywords: biostratigraphy, calcareous nannofossils, Danian/Selandian boundary, planktonic foraminifera, north- central Sinai Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt � Mahmoud Faris1 and Sherif Farouk2 1 Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Egypt; (mhmfaris@yahoo.com) 2 Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Nasr City, 11727, Egypt; (geo.sherif@hotmail.com) doi: 104154/gc.2012.10 Geologia Croatica 65/2 139–160 3 Figs. 4 Tabs. 3 Pls. Zagreb 2012 Geologia CroaticaGeologia Croatica 1. INTRODUCTION The Palaeocene successions in Egypt are marked by widely distributed, condensed successions rich in calcareous plank- tonic faunal assemblages with distinct vertical and lateral facies changes. A considerable number of previous papers deal with the biostratigraphy of the Palaeocene of Sinai (e.g. LÜNING et al., 1998; MARZOUK & LÜNING, 1998; EL- NADY & SHAHIN, 2001; SAMIR, 2002; AYYAD et al., 2003; SPEIJER, 2003; AL-WOSABI & ABU SHAMA, 2007; FARIS & SALEM, 2007; FARIS & ABU SHAMA, 2007; FAROUK & FARIS, 2008). The present study pro- vides the fi rst information on the biostratigraphy at Gebel Umm Khushayb and only a few small works have been un- dertaken on the El-Hassana area (EL-DEEB et al., 2000 & FARIS et al., 2000). These authors placed the Palaeocene stage boundaries according to older concepts (before defi ni- Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 140 specimen /2–5 fov), R= rare (one specimen/6–10 fov) and VR=very rare (one specimen/ more than 10 fov). For the planktonic foraminifera, about 200g of dry rock samples were disaggregated in water and washed through a 63μm sieve. The relative abundance of planktonic foraminif- eral taxa are defi ned as follows: abundant, >26%; common, 16–25%; few, 6–15%; rare, 2–5%; very rare, <2%. 3. GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY Tectonically, SAID (1962) divided Egypt into two major provinces, the deformed Unstable Shelf to the north, and the nearly horizontal and less deformed Stable Shelf to the south (Fig. 1). The Syrian Arc Fold Belt is one of the best-known structural features in the Unstable Shelf, and it played an im- portant role in controlling the confi guration of the deposi- tional sequences and the great complexity of changes both in facies and thickness (FAROUK & FARIS, 2008). The study area lies in north-central Sinai of the Unstable Shelf and is characterized by complex uplifts and domal anticlines of the Syrian Arc Fold Belt, that were formed during the clo- sure of Neo-Tethys during the convergence of the African- Arabian Craton (STAMPFLI et al., 1995). Maastrichtian – Palaeocene siliciclastic/carbonate out- crops are widely distributed in north-central Sinai, where the Campanian-Maastrichtian Sudr Formation overlies uncon- formably the Palaeocene sediments, which correspond to four well-defi ned formations from oldest to youngest are; Dakhla Formation, Tarawan Formation and lowermost part of the Esna Formation and their lateral coeval Beida Formation. The following is a detailed lithostratigraphic description of the detected Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene formations in the study area, given from older to younger (Fig, 2). Sudr Formation- Campanian-Maastrichtian The Campanian-Maastrichtian Sudr Formation (GHORAB, 1961) is widespread throughout the foot slopes of Sinai. It unconformably overlies the Dakhla or Bedia formations with a sharp lithological contact. The Sudr Formation is subdi- vided from base to top into the Markha and Abu Zenima members. The study measured part of the Sudr Formation deals only with the uppermost part of Abu Zenima Member (Upper Maastrichtian). It consists of argillaceous li me stone with a measured thickness of about 2–2.5 m in the study sec- tions (Fig. 2). Dakhla Formation- Danian-Selandian The term Dakhla Formation was fi rstly used by SAID (1961) to describe the Maastrichtian-Palaeocene siliciclastics and carbonate deposits in Dakhla Oasis, Western Desert. In northern latitudes 26º30’ in Egypt, the lower part of the Da- khla Formation is generally laterally equivalent to carbonate facies (the Sudr and Khoman formations). Therefore in the Sinai Peninsula, the Dakhla Formation belongs to the Palaeocene and it overlies unconformably the tion of the global stratotypes of the Danian/Selandian and Selandian/Thanetian boundaries). In the two study sections, the K/Pg, De/Se and Se/Th remain unclear and not been pre- cisely identifi ed. However, many discrepancies in the Palaeocene bio- events could not be clarifi ed because either taxonomically different concepts caused uncertainties in correlation of the Palaeocene zones, especially in the southern Tethyan realm, (ORUE-ETXEBARRIA et al., 2007; ARENILAS, 2012), or these marker bio-events are recorded from different palaeo- latitudes showing considerable variations in age (FAROUK & FARIS, 2011). The main purpose of this research was to accurately cor- relate the Palaeocene bio-events with the standard biostrati- graphic scales, using both calcareous nannofossils and plank- tonic foraminifera, for two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, and to discuss in details the Cretaceous/Palaeogene (K/Pg), the Danian/Selandian (Da/Se) and the Selandian/Thanetian (Se/Th) boundaries in the studied successions. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-six rock samples were collected, approximately ev- ery. 25–50 cm from the two studied sections at Gebel Umm Khushayb (30º14’27”N and 33º13’33”E) and west El-Has- sana (30º25’40”N and 33º46’41”E), (Fig. 1). Calcareous nannofossils were analyzed using standard smear slides, which were examined using a light photomi- croscope at 1250X magnifi cation. A qualitative estimation of the abundance of calcareous nannofossil taxa are noted as follows: A= abundant (more than 5 specimens /fi eld of view, fov), C=common (1–5 specimens/fov), F=frequent (one Figure 1: Location map of the study area. Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 141 Maastrichtian Sudr Formation and also underlies the Tarawan Formation, with very clear contact, and can be easily recog- nized in the fi eld. It consists mainly of moderately hard, greenish grey monotonous pelagic calcareous mudstone with fl ooded well-diversifi ed calcareous planktonic assemblages with thicknesses ranging from 20 to 25 m in the west El- Hassana section. Tarawan Formation- Thanetian The Tarawan Formation (AWAD & GHOBRIAL, 1965) is composed of hard to moderately hard, massive yellowish white argillaceous limestone, partly limonitic with a thick- ness of 2 to 4 m in the west El-Hassana section. The partly resistant, light-coloured limestone of this unit is clearly dis- tinguished from the overlying and underlying dark-colored Figure 2: Stratigraphic correlation of the studied sections in the north-central Sinai. Calcareous nannofossil schemes are after MARTINI (NP, 1971) and VAROL (NTp, 1989) and SISSIGH (CC, 1977). Planktonic foraminiferal schemes are after BERGGREN & PEARSON (P, 2005). Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 142 soft shales. In Egypt, the Dakhla Formation is overlain by the Tarawan Formation which includes, at its upper part, the so- called “Velascoensis Event” with notable changes in the pat- terns of sedimentation in late Palaeocene time. The event that produced those changes is believed to be primarily tectonic coupled with global sea-level fall (STROUGO, 1986). Beida Formation- Palaeocene The term Beida Formation was fi rstly used by ALLAM & KHALIL (1988) based upon predominant carbonate depos- its at Wadi Beida, north of Gebel Arif El-Naqa. It is equiva- lent to the Palaeocene siliciclastic/carbonate of the Esna For- mation, which is recorded in different parts of Egypt. In the study area, the Beida Formation has a wide dis- tribution in the submerged palaeo-high areas around central Sinai, extending from Gebel Umm Khushayb to Ras Sudr. It unconformably overlies and underlies the Sudr and Thebes formations, respectively. The Beida Formation attains a total thickness of 40 m and is composed of greenish gray marl, argillaceous limestone, and well-bedded chalky limestone with chert bands in the Gebel Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 4. BIOSTRATIGRAPHY The biostratigraphy is evaluated here based on the Creta- ceous Foraminiferal (CF) Zonal Scheme of LI & KELLER (1998) and on the Palaeocene (P) Zonal Scheme of BERG- GERN & PEARSON (2005). These zonal schemes are ap- plied in the present study to provide a much improved bio- stratigraphic framework. For the calcareous nannofossil zonation, the Cretaceous Zonal Scheme of SISSINGH (1977) and the Palaeogene Zonal Scheme of MARTINI (NP, 1971) and VAROL (NTp, 1989) have been applied. The distribution of the calcareous nannofossils and planktonic foraminifera in the two studied sections are shown in Tables 1–4. The most important fo- raminifera and calcareous nannofossil taxa are fi gured in three plates (1–3). Abbreviations used FO= First Occurrence, LO= Last Occurrence; FCO= First Common Occurrence; FRO= First Rare Occurrence. The following is the descrip- tion of the established calcareous nannofossil and planktonic foraminiferal biozones arranged from older to younger. 4.1. Calcareous nannofossils 4.1.1. Micula prinsii Subzone (CC26c) Defi nition: The Micula prinsii Subzone is defi ned as the in- terval from the FO of Micula prinsii Perch-Nielsen to the increased frequency of Thoracosphaera operculata Bram- lette & Martini. Occurrence: This zone occupied the upper most part of the Sudr Formation and is represented by samples 220–221 (2 m thick) in Umm Khushayb; and samples 1–6 in west El- Hassana (2.5 m thick). Characteristic species: The most important taxa also identifi ed from this subzone are: Ahmuellerella octoradiata (GORKA), Arkhangelskiella cymbiformis VEKSHINA, Ch- iastozygus amphipons (BRAMLETTE & MARTINI), Strad- neria crenulala (BRAMLETTE & MARTINI), Cribrospha- erella ehrenbergii (ARKHANGELSKY), Cyclagelosphaera reinhardtii (PERCH-NIELSEN), Eiffellithus gorkae Rein- hardt, Lithraphidites quadratus BRAMLETTE & MAR- TINI, Lucianorhabdus cayeuxii DEFLANDRE, Manivitella pemmatoidea (DEFLANDRE in MANIVIT), Microrhabdu- lus decoratus DEFLANDRE, Micula decussata VEKSHI NA, Zygolithus crux (DEFLANDRE & PERT), and others (Ta- bles 1 & 2). Rare specimens of M. murus (MARTINI) and M. prinsii PERCH-NIELSEN are recorded in the topmost part of the Sudr Formation in the studied sections. Remarks: The Micula prinsii Subzone was informally defi ned by PERCH-NIELSEN (1979) and corresponds to the upper part of Zone CC26 of SISSINGH (1977). This sub- zone is a correlative of the latest Maastrichtian. However, its upper limit cannot be determined with accuracy in the two studied sections due to a large hiatus observed at the base of the Palaeocene. Plate 1 1–2 Arkhangelskiella cymbiformis VEKSHINA, 1959, sample 2, west El-Hassana section. 3 Watznaueria barnesae (BLACK in BLACK & BARNES, 1959), sample 221, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 4 Chiastozygus amphipons (BRAMLETTE & MARTINI, 1964), sample 4, west El Hassana section. 5 Braarudosphaera bigelowii (GRAN & BRAARUD, 1935), sample 3, west El Hassana section. 6–7 Microrhabdulus decoratus DEFLANDRE, 1959, sample 221, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 8 Lithraphidites carniolensis DEFLANDRE, 1963, sample No.5, west El-Hassana section. 9–10 Placozygus sigmoides (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961), sample 32, west El-Hassana section. 11 Eiff ellithus gorkae REINHARDT (1965), sample 220, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 12 Zeugrhabdotus pseudanthophorus (BRAMLETTE & MARTINI, 1964), sample 3, west El-Hassana section. 13 Thoracosphaera operculata BRAMLETTE & MARTINI, 1964, sample 228, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 14 Thoracosphaera saxea STRADNER, 1961, sample 12, west El-Hassana section. 15 Lucianorhabdus cayeuxii DEFLANDRE, 1959, sample 220, Gebel Umm Khushayb sectio. 16–17 Micula prinsii PERCH-NIELSEN, 1979, sample1, west El-Hassana section. 18–19 Micula murus (MARTINI, 1961), sample 2, west El-Hassana section. 20 Cribrosphaerella ehrenbergii (ARKHANGELSKY, 1912), sample 221, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 21–22 Micula decussata VEKSHINA, 1959, sample 222, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 23 Zygodiscus spiralis BRAMLETTE & MARTINI, 1964, sample 4, west El-Hassana section. 24 Manivitella pemmatoidea (DEFLANDRE in MANIVIT, 1965), sample 221, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 25 Tetrapodorhabdus decorus (DEFLANDER in DEFLANDER & FERT, 1954), sample 5, west El-Hassana section. Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 143 Micula murus is one of the rare Maastrichtian species and clearly restricted to low latitudes (WORSLEY AND MAR- TINI, 1970; THIERSTEIN, 1981; GARDIN, 2002; LEES, 2002). It was used for recognition of the uppermost Maastric- tian (LAMOLDA & GOROSTIDI, 1992; POSPICAL, 1994; BERNAOLA & MONECHI, 2007 and many others). Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 144 Plate 2 1–2 Ellipsolithus macellus (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961), sample 9, west El-Hassana section. 3 Chiasmolithus edentulus VAN HECK & PRINS, 1987, sample 22, west El-Hassana section. 4 Neochiastozygus perfectus PERCH-NIELSEN, 1971, sample 247, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 5 Neochiastozygus junctus (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961), sample 242, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 6 Fasciculithus tympaniformis HAY & MOHLER in HAY et al., 1967, sample 40, west El-Hassana section. 7 Fasciculithus billii PERCH-NIELSEN, 1971, sample 42, west El-Hassana section. 8 Fasciculithus janii PERCH-NIELSEN, 1971, sample 36, west El-Hassana section. 9 Fasciculithus pileatus BUKRY, 1973, sample 242, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 10 Fasciculithus involutus BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961, sample No.40, west El-Hassana section. 11 Fasciculithus alanii PERCH-NIELSEN, 1971, sample 45, west El-Hassana section. 12–13 Sphenolithus primus PERCH-NIELSEN, 1971, sample 245, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 14 Toweius eminens (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961), sample 247, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 15 Cruciplacolithus primus PERCH-NIELSEN, 1977, sample No.224, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 16 Chiasmolithus danicus (BROTZEN, 1959), sample 7, west El-Hassana section. 17 Cruciplacolithus tenuis (STRADNER, 1961), sample 10, west El-Hassana section. 18 Chiasmolithus bidens (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN, 1961), sample 248, Gebel Umm Khushayb section. 19 Markalius inversus (DEFLANDRE in DEFLANDRE & FERT, 1954), sample No.6, west El-Hassana section. 20–21 Ericsonia subpertusa HAY & MOHLER, 1967, sample No.20, west El Hassana section. 22 Heliolithus kleinpellii SULLIVAN, 1964, sample No.42, west El-Hassana section. 23 Discoaster mohleri BUKRY & PERCIVAL, 1971, sample No. 45, west El-Hassana section. 4.1.2. Chiasmolithus danicus Zone (NP3) Defi nition: The Chiasmolithus danicus Zone is defi ned as the interval from the FO of Chiasmolithus danicus (BROT- ZEN) to the FO of Ellipsolithus macellus (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN). Occurrence: This zone occupied the lowermost part of the Dakhla and Bedia formations and is represented by sam- ples 222–227 (2.5 m thick) in Umm Khushayb; and samples 7–8 in west El-Hassana (0.2 m thick). Characteristic species: The most characteristic species of this zone are: Cruciplacolithus tenuis (STRADNER), C. primus PERCH-NIELSEN, Ericsonia subpertusa HAY & MOHLER, E. cava (HAY & MOHLER) and Coccolithus pelagicus (WALLICH). Remarks: The vanishing Cretaceous species are those extinct at the K/Pg boundary, and the Cretaceous persistent species are those calcareous nannofossil genera and species that are known to occur in the Cretaceous and survive into the Palaeocene (PERCH-NIELSEN, 1985b). The NP3 Zone is characterized by a decrease of Cretaceous vanishing spe- cies. In the two studied sections, Cretaceous persistent spe- cies are very rare in this zone and only a few specimens of Thoracosphaera operculata BRAMLETTE & MARTINI, Placozygus sigmoides (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN) and Cyclagelosphaera reinhardtii (PERCH-NIELSEN) domi- nate the assemblage. This zone has a reduced thickness in both the studied sections. Cruciplacolithus edwardsii RO- MEIN fi rst appears simultaneously with the FO of Ch. dan- icus (base NP3). The identifi ed Zone NP3 is equivalent to Zone NP3 of MARTINI (1971), the upper part of the Cruciplacolithus tenuis Zone of ROMEIN (1979), the CP2 Zone of OKADA & BUKRY (1980), FARIS & ABU SHAMA (2007) and FARIS & SALEM (2007). 4.1.3. Ellipsolithus macellus Zone (NP4) Defi nition: The FO of Ellipsolithus macellus (BRAMLE- TTE & SULLIVAN) is used to defi ne the base of Zone NP4, and the FO of Fasciculithus tympaniformis HAY & MOH- LER defi ned its top (MARTINI, 1971). Occurrence: This zone occupied the middle part of the Dakhla and Bedia formations, represented by samples 228– 244 (14.5m thick) in Umm Khushayb; and samples 9–39 in West El-Hassana (19 m thick). Characteristic species: The FOs of Fasciculithus ulii PERCH-NIELSEN, F. billii PERCH-NIELSEN, F. bitectus ROMEIN, F. pileatus BUKRY, F. involutus BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN and F. janii PERCH-NIELSEN occur within the Zone NP4 in the two study sections. Remarks: According to the Palaeocene zonation of VA- ROL (1989), the Zone NP4 in west El-Hassana and Umm Khushayb sections can be divided into three subzones, NTp6, NTp7 and NTp8. VAROL (1989) subdivided Zone NTp7 and NTp8 into several subzones. In the present study, it was so diffi cult to subdivide these two biozones into sev- eral subzones due to the extreme condensation of this inter- val. On the other hand, Zone NP4 could be divided into two subzones; NP4a, Ellipsolithus macellus-Sphenolithus primus Subzone, it is defi ned from the FO of E. macellus (BRAM- LETTE & SULLIVAN) to the FO of Sphenolithus primus PERCH-NIELSEN and NP4b, Sphenolithus primus -Fas- ciculithus tympaniformis defi nes from the FO of Spheno- lithus primus to the FO of Fasciculithus tympaniformis (QUILLÉVÉRÉ et al., 2002 and FARIS et al., 2005). This subdivision was applied in the current study. A small hiatus is suggested at the NP3/NP4 zonal boundary in the two studied sections, based on the absence of the uppermost part of Zone NP3 and the basal part of Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 145 Zone NP4 (absence of Subzone NTp5B and NTp5C and most probably the lowermost of Zone NTp6 of VAROL, 1989). Also a minor hiatus is detected at the NP3/NP4 zonal boundary of the northern scarp of the Farafra Oasis (TAN- TAWY et al., 2003). The NTp6 Subzone is defi ned as the interval from the FO of Ellipsolithus macellus to the LO of Neochiastozygus imbriei HAQ & LOHMANN and N. eosaepes PERCH-NIELSEN. Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 146 Plate 3 1 Heterohelix globulosa (EHRENBERG, 1840), sample 3, west El-Hassana section. 2 Heterohelix navarroensis LOEBLICH, 1951, sample 6, west El-Hassana section. 3 Heterohelix labellosa NEDERBAGT, 1991, sample 220, Umm Khyushab section. 4 Pseudoguembelina costulata (CUSHMAN, 1938), sample 221, Umm Khyushab section. 5–6 Globanomalina compressa (PLUMMER, 1926), sample 229, Umm Khyushab section. 7 Globanomalina pseudomenardii (BOLLI, 1957), sample 247, Umm Khyushab section. 8–10 Praemurica inconstans (SUBBOTINA, 1953), sample 25, west El-Hassana section. 11–13 Morozovella trinidadensis (BOLLI, 1957), sample 25, west El-Hassana section. 14–15 Igorina albeari (CUSHMAN & BERMUDEZ, 1949), sample 36, west El -Hassana section. 16–18 Morozovella angulata (WHITE, 1928), sample 34, west El-Hassana section. 19 Morozovella conicotruncata (SUBBOTINA, 1947), sample 240, Umm Khyushab section. 20–21 Morozovella occlusa (LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957), sample 240, Umm Khyushab section. 22 Morozovella pasionensis (BERMÚDEZ, 1961), sample 34, west El-Hassana section. 23 Acarinina strabocella (LOEBLICH & TAPPAN, 1957), sample 34, west El-Hassana section. 24–25 Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (PLUMMER, 1926), sample 224, Umm Khyushab section. 26–27 Parasubbotina varianta (SUBBOTINA, 1953), sample 246, Umm Khyushab section. 28 Subbotina triangularis (WHITE, 1928), sample 34, west El-Hassana section. 29 Subbotina triloculinoides (PLUMMER, 1926), sample 25, west El-Hassana section. 30 Subbotina velascoensis (CUSHMAN, 1925), sample 252, Umm Khyushab section. scale bar=100 μm in all fi gures. The distribution of Ellipsolithus macellus is considered as being controlled by preservation (dissolution) (MON- ECHI et al., 1985) or different palaeoecological conditions (BACKMAN, 1986, MONECHI et al., 1985). In the study sections, E. macellus, shows a rare and spo- radic presence throughout the study interval which may be a result of dissolution and /or the effect of diagenesis. The subzone NTp7 defi nes the stratigraphic interval from the LOs of Neochiastozygus imbriei and N. eosaepes to the FCO (First Common Occurrence) of Sphenolithus primus. The FO of Chiasmolithus edentulus marks the base of Subzone NTp7B of VAROL (1989) and occurs within Zone NTp7 in the west El-Hassana and Umm Khushayb sec- tions. According to VAROL (1989), the FO of this taxon can be used to directly correlate Tethys and the type area across the D/S boundary. The fi rst occurrence of Ch. edentulus in the study sections is easily correlated with the type area of the Danian/Selandian boundary. The NTp8 has been defi ned to include the interval from the FO of Sphenolithus primus to the FO of Fasciculithus tympaniformis. Previous studies have indicated that the oc- currences of Sphenolithus and Fasciculithus (Palaeocene taxa) are closely related. It is generally believed that the ge- nus Sphenolithus appears just below the genus Fasciculithus (e.g. ROMEIN, 1979; BACKMAN, 1986; BERGGREN et al., 1995), although other authors observed a reverse setting in the relative stratigraphic position of the two biohorizons (VAROL, 1989; BERGGREN et al., 2000). The onset of the fi rst radiation of Fasciculithus species occurs in samples 24 and 240 in the west El-Hassana and Umm Khushayb sections, respectively. The onset of the sec- ond radiation of Fasciculithus taxa occurs in samples 36 in the west El-Hassana section and in sample 242 in the Umm Khushayb section. Radiation of Fasciculithus (F. pileatus, F. bitectus, F. involutus, F. janii, and F. ulii) fi rst occurred in higher levels above the FO of S. primus in the study area. As proposed by PERCH-NIELSEN (1985b) the FO of Neochiastozygus perfectus PERCH-NIELSEN was used for delineating the base of Zone NP5 in North Sea area. In the Zumaia section, the FO of this taxon occurs above the First Common Occurrence (FCO) of S. primus and immediately below the LCO of Braarudosphaera (DINARES-TURELL et al., 2007). In the two studied sections, N. perfectus fi rst appears within Zone NP4 (Zone NTp7). The FO of N. perfectus in Zone NP4 in the study sec- tions is considered to be earlier than reported in the North Sea area, and it is therefore apparently a diachronous event and must be used with caution for long distance corre lation. 4.1.4. Fasciculithus tympaniformis Zone (NP5) Defi nition: The fi rst occurrence (FO) of Fasciculithus tympaniformis is used to defi ne the base of Zone NP5 and the FO of Heliolithus kleinpellii SULLIVAN defi nes its top. Occurrence: This zone occupied the interval from the upper part of the Dakhla and Bedia formations, samples 245– 249 (3 m thick) in the Umm Khushayb section, and samples 40–41 in the west El-Hassana section (1.5 m thick). Characteristic species: The most characteristic species of this zone include those of Zone NP4 in addition to Fas- ciculithus tympaniformis. Remarks: According to PERCH-NIELSEN (1985b), Toweius eminens (BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN) fi rst ap- pears within Zone NP5. In the Zumaia section, the lowest occurrence of Toweius eminens occurs in the middle part of NP5 (DINARÈS-TURELL et al., 2007). At Umm Khushayb, this species (Toweius eminens) fi rst occurs within NP5, while in the west El-Hassana section, T. eminens is fi rst recorded within the upper part of Zone NP4. In the study sections,Zone NP5 corresponds to NP5 Zo- ne of MARTINI (1971), the Fasciculithus tympaniformis Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 147 Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 148 Ta bl e1 : St ra tig ra ph ic d is tr ib ut io n of th e id en tifi e d c al ca re ou s n an no fo ss ils in W es t E l-H as sa na se ct io n , N C Si ni a, E gy pt Ag e Fo rm at io n Sa m pl e N o. A bu nd an ce Pr es er va ti on N an no fo ss il Zo ne Cretaceous Taxa Survivor Taxa W at zn au er ia b ar ne sa e M ic ul a de cu ss at a Ar kh an ge lsk ie lla cy m bi fo rm is Cr ib ro sp ha er el la e hr en be rg ii El lip so lit hu s t ur ris ife lli M ic ro rh ab du lu s d ec or at us Lu ci an or ha bd us ca ye ux ii Ei ff e lli th us g or ka e Cr ib ro co ro na g al lic a Zy go di sc us sp ira lis Pr ed isc os ph ae ra cr et ac ea Te tra po do rh ab du s d ec or us M ic ul a pr in sii Rh ag od isc us a sp er Li th ra ph id ite s c ar ni ol en sis Li th ra ph id ite s q ua dr at us Si ra dn er ia cr en ul al a Ce ra to lit ho id es k am pt ne ri Cy cl ag el os ph ae ra a lta Pr ed isc os ph ae ra s to ve ri M ic ul a m ur us Ze ug rh ab do tu s p se ud an th op ho ru s Ch ia st oz yg us a m ph ip on s Th or ac os ph ae ra o pe rc ul at a Cy cl ag el os ph ae ra re in ha rd tii Bi sc ut um co ns ta ns Th or ac os ph ae ra sa xe a Br aa ru do sp ha er a bi ge lo w ii M ar ka liu s i nv er su s Pl ac oz yg us si gm oi de s Th an et ia n Ta ra w an 45 F G N P7 /8 P4                                               VR             44 F G                                               VR             43 C G                                               VR           R Se la nd ia n D a k h l a 42 R M NP6                                               VR             41 F G N P5                                               VR           VR 40 F G                                               VR           VR 39 B N P4 N Tp 8 P3 b                                                             38 F M                                               R           VR 37 F M                                               F           R 36 F M                                               VR           VR D an ia n 35 F M                                               VR           R 34 F M                                               VR         VR R 33 C G P3 a     VR                                         R           F 32 C G N Tp 7     VR                                         R           F 31 A G     VR                                         R           F 30 A G                                               R           F 29 C G P2                                               VR           R 28 F M                                               VR           VR 27 C G   VR VR                                         VR           R 26 F M                                               R           VR 25 C G     VR                                         R       VR   R 24 C G                                               R             23 A G   VR VR                                         R           R 22 R M                                               F           VR 21 B                                                             20 F M   VR                                           VR VR         R 19 C M     VR                                         R           R 18 C M VR VR VR                                         F VR         R 17 C M                                               VR VR         R 16 F M         VR                                     VR           VR 15 F M VR VR VR                                         VR           VR 14 F M N Tp 6 VR VR VR VR                                   VR   VR VR       VR VR 13 C M VR VR VR                                         VR VR         VR 12 C M VR VR VR VR VR                                 VR   VR     VR     VR 11 C M                                               VR VR   VR       10 C M VR VR VR                                         VR             9 F M VR VR VR VR   VR                               VR VR F R         R 8 C M NP3 P1 c VR VR VR VR VR VR           VR VR     VR VR   VR       VR R R VR VR     R 7 C M R VR VR VR VR   VR VR   VR   VR         VR         VR VR VR VR VR       R 6 F M CC 26 c CF 2 VR VR VR VR VR VR VR   VR VR VR VR       VR VR         VR   VR VR VR   R VR VR La te st M aa s. Su dr 5 F M F R           VR     VR VR     VR                 R VR VR VR       4 C M F R VR VR VR         VR         VR VR               R VR VR VR       3 C M R R R R R R VR VR VR VR     VR VR VR VR   VR VR VR   VR R R VR VR   R     2 F M F R R VR VR       VR       VR         VR VR VR R     R VR VR   R     1 C M C F R R R R VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR VR R     R VR VR VR       Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 149 Ta bl e 1: c on tin ue Incoming Paleocene Taxa C ru ci pl ac ol ith us e dw ar ds ii N eo ch ia st oz yg us im br ie i Cr uc ip la co lit hu s t en ui s Er ic so ni a ca va Er ic so ni a su bp er tu sa Ch ia sm ol ith us d an ic us N eo ch ia st oz yg us e os ae pe s Co cc ol ith us p el ag ic us El lip so lit hu s m ac el lu s Ch ia sm ol ith us d an ic us Sp he no lit hu s p rim us Ch ia sm ol ith us e de nt ul us To w ei us to va e El lip so lit hu s d ist ic hu s Cr uc ip la co lit hu s s ub ro tu nd us N eo ch ia st oz yg us m od es tu s Cr uc ip la co lit hu s s ub ro tu nd us Fa sc ic ul ith us p ile at us Fa sc ic ul ith us ja ni i Fa sc ic ul ith us in vo lu tu s Fa sc ic ul ith us b ite ct us Fa sc ic ul ith us b ill ii Er ic so ni a un iv er sa To w ei us e m in en s N eo ch ia st oz yg us p er fe ct us Fa sc ic ul ith us u lii Fa sc ic ul ith us b ob ii Bo m ol ith us co ni cu s El lip so lit hu s d ist ic hu s Fa sc ic ul ith us ty m pa ni fo rm is Fa sc ic ul ith us li lli an ae Ch ia sm ol ith us ca lif or ni cu s Fa sc ic ul ith us cl in at us H el io lit hu s c an ta br ia e H el io lit hu s k le in pe lli i Fa sc ic ul ith us sc ha ub ii D isc oa st er m oh le ri Fa sc ic ul ith us ri ch ar di i Fa sc ic ul ith us a la ni i       R       R   V R F   R         V R   F     VR R     F     F     R     VR VR   VR       F R     F   V R F   V R           VR R             R     F         VR   VR           F F     F     R   V R           VR F     R VR R VR R     F           VR VR VR         VR VR     VR     R             V R   R     V R             R       VR R               F       R     F V R             V R R   R R VR   VR VR VR   F   R VR VR               V R   R     R   V R F V R V R         F F F   VR R R VR R VR VR VR F VR                                                                                                     F F     R VR VR R VR VR     VR VR R R R R VR     R R VR                             VR R       R VR VR F R       R R           R   F                                   R R     R   R F VR VR     R VR F F R F F F R VR F                               R F R     R VR R F VR       R                 R                                   R F     R   R VR         R             F R                                   R F C     R VR VR VR VR   VR   R             F R                                   R F C     R   F   VR VR     R             F                                     R F C     F   F           VR R           F                                     R F C     F VR F     VR     VR R VR   VR     R                                     R F C     F   R   VR       VR R     VR                                           R F R     F   VR   VR       VR                                                   R F F     F   R   VR VR     VR                                                     F F     F       R VR                                                         VR F R     F   R   R VR     VR VR VR   VR                                             F R     R VR   R R VR VR     R F F F R R                                       R F R     R   VR   R       R VR                                                   R R     R       R                                                                                                                                           F F     R   VR VR                                                             C F F     R VR VR R   VR   VR                                                     R F R     R   VR   VR                                                           F R R     R   VR   VR   VR                                                       R R R     R   VR R VR VR                                                         R R R     R   R                                                             VR R R   VR VR VR   VR R                                                           VR   F F VR VR R VR VR                                                               F F F     R   R                                                           R VR C F   VR   R VR VR R                                                       R VR C F   VR VR F VR R R                                                         R VR F F R VR VR R VR F                                                           VR VR F F R   VR F                                                                 VR R R R VR VR                                                                 VR                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     A bu nd an ce Pr es er va tio n A : A bu nd an t G : G oo d C: C om m on M : M od er at e F: F re qu an t P: P oo r R: R ar e VR : V er y ra re * M ar ke r s pe ci es Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 150 Ta bl e2 : St ra tig ra ph ic d is tr ib ut io n of th e id en tifi e d c al ca re ou s n an no fo ss ils in G eb el U m m K hu sh ay b se ct io n Ag e Fo rm at io n Sa m pl e N o. A bu nd an ce Pr es er va ti on N an no fo ss il Zo ne Cretaceous Taxa Survivors Lu ci an or ha bd us ca ye ux ii M ic ro rh ab du lu s d ec or at us Ch ia st oz yg us li tt er ar iu s W at zn au er ia b ar an es ae Pr ed isc os ph ae ra cr et ac ea Ei ff e lli th us g or ka e Ah m ue lle re lla o ct or ad ia ta Ar kh an ge lsk ie lla cy m bi fo rm is M ic ul a m ur us * Cr ib ro sp ha er el la e hr en be rg ii Ze ug rh ab do tu s p se ud an th op ho rt us M ic ul a de cu ss at a M ic ul a pr in sii Te tra po do rh ab du s d ec or us Ei ff e lli th us tu rr isi ef eu ii Zy go lit hu s c ru x St ra dn er ia cr en ul at a Ei ff e lli th us p ar al le lu s Li th ra ph id ite s q ua dr at us M an iv ite lla p em m at oi de a Th or ac os ph ae ra o pe rc ul at a Pl ac oz yg us si gm oi de s Cy cl ag el os ph ae ra re in ha rd tii Th or ac os ph ae ra sa xe a M ar ka liu s i nv er su s Br aa ru do sp ha er a bi ge lo w ii Se la nd ia n Be id a 251 C G N P6 P4                                         F           250 C M                                         F R         249 R M N P5                                           R         248 C M                                         F R         247 F G                                           R         246 C M                                           F         245 C G                                           F         244 F M N P4 N Tp 8 P3 b                                                     243 C G                                         R       R   242 C G                                         R R         D an ia n 241 C M                                         R R         240 C M                                         R R         239 B N Tp 7 P3 a                                                 R   238 C M               R                           R         237 F M               R       R                   R       R 236 F G P2                                         R R       V R 235 A G                                         R R       V R 234 C G N Tp 6                                         R F     R   233 R M                                         R R         232 F M       R                                 R           231 F M               R       R                 R R         230 C M                       V R                 R   F       229 C M P1 c               V R       V R                 F F F       228 A M               V R       V R     R   R       F   F       227 R M N P3               V R   R   V R                 F   R       226 R P   R   R                                 F           225 C G       R       V R   R   R                 F F     R   224 F G P1 b R   R F       V R   R R R                 F F         223 R M R     R R     R R     R R               R R         222 F M R R   R R     R   R   F               R R R         M aa s. Su dr 221 C M CC 26 c CF 2 R F R F R R   R R R   F   R R R R R R R R R       VR 220 C M R R R F R R R R R R R F R R R           R R R R R VR Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 151 Ta bl e 2: c on tin ue Incoming Paleocene Taxa N eo ch ia st oz yg us p er fe ct us Cr uc ip la co lit hu s t en ui s* Ch ia sm ol ith us d an ic us * Cr uc ip la co lit hu s p rim us Co cc ol ith us p el ag ic us Er ic so ni a su bp er tu sa Cr uc ip la co lit hu s e dw ar ds ii N eo ch ia st oz yg us m od es tu s N eo ch ia st oz yg us im br ie i N eo ch ia st oz yg us e os ae pe s El lip so lit hu s m ac el lu s Sp he no lit hu s p rim us Ch ia sm ol ith us e de nt ul us Fa sc ic ul ith us b ite ct us Fa sc ic ul ith us p ile at us Er ic so ni a un iv er sa N eo ch ia st oz yg us ju nc tu s Fa sc ic ul ith us p ile at us Er ic so ni a un iv er sa Fa sc ic ul ith us b ob ii Fa sc ic ul ith us ty m pa ni fo rm is* Ch ia sm ol ith us co ns ue tu s Ch ia sm ol ith us b id en s To w ei us e m in en s H el io lit hu s c an ta br ia e Bo m ol ith us co ni cu s H el io lit hu s k le in pe lli i Fa sc ic ul ith us a la ni i D isc oa st er b ra m le tt ei R   R   F R           F       R R     R R     R     R R R R         F           F       F R R   R F     F   F R R R R       R                         R           R R         R   F   F F           R           R     R R R F           R       F             F       F   R   R F F   F           R   R   F     R     R F       R R R   R R R R             R   F   F F         R F       R   R   F R R               R     F R     R       R     R                             R R R   F F   R         R R F R   R R R                   R       F     R       F   F F   R F R F                       F   F             R R   R F                             R R   R F   R       R   R                                                       R                                     R   R R   R                                               R   R F             R                                   R R R R R         R                                       R R   F C           R                                     R R R F F     VR VR                                               F F   R R R R                                             F F     R R                                         R R R F F     R R                                           R   F R R R R   R R                                     R R   F F R R R                                           F R R F F R   R R R                                       R   R R R                                                       R R                                                 F R R R F R                                               F   F F F   R                                               R       R                                               V R R V R V R R R                                                                                                                                                                 A bu nd an ce Pr es er va tio n A : A bu nd an t G : G oo d C: C om m on M : M od er at e F: F re qu an t P: P oo r R: R ar e VR : V er y ra re * M ar ke r s pe ci es Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 152 zo ne of ROMEIN (1979), and the CP4 Zone of OKADA & BUKRY (1980), FARIS & ABU SHAMA (2007) and FARIS & SALEM (2007). 4.1.5. Heliolithus kleinpellii Zone (NP6) Defi nition: The FO of Heliolithus kleinpellii defi nes the base of Zone NP6 and the FO of Discoaster mohleri BUKRY & PERCIVAL defi nes its top. Occurrence: Zone NP6 occupies the interval from the upper part of the Dakhla and Bedia formations and is repre- sented by samples 250–251 (2.5 m thick) in the Umm Khu- shayb section and occurs only in sample 42 (0.4 m thick) in the west El-Hassana section. Characteristic species: In addition to the fl oral as- semblage, which characterizes Zone NP5, the following species are recorded in this zone: Heliolithus kleinpellii, Fasciculithus alanii PERCH-NIELSEN, Discoaster bram- lettei MARTINI, and Bomolithus conicus (PERCH- NIELSEN). Remarks: The FO of Heliolithus cantabriae PERCH- NIELSEN predates the FO of H. kleinpellii in the Umm Khushayb and west El-Hassana sections, and occurs at the top of Zone NP5, in agreement with the observations of PERCH-NIELSEN (1985b) and TANTAWY et al. (2003). In the Umm Khushayb section, Discoaster bramlettei occurs at the base of Zone NP6 and is considered here to be a reli- able marker for the base of Zone NP6 in this section. 4.1.6. Discoaster mohleri Zone (NP7/8) Defi nition: The FO of Discoaster mohleri BUKRY & PER- CIVAL is used to defi ne the base of Zone NP7/8 and the ap- pearance of Discoaster multiradiatus BRAMLETTE & RE- IDEL delineates its top. Occurrence: This zone is only represented by the Tara- wan Formation in the west El-Hassana section (samples 43– 45, 1m thick). Characteristic species: In addition to the identifi ed nan- nofossils that have been recorded in the Zone NP6; Dis- coaster mohleri, Fasciculithus schaubii HAY & MOHLER, and F. richardii PERCH-NIELSEN have their fi rst appear- ance in this zone. Remarks: The zonal scheme of MARTINI (1971) can- not be applied to this interval because the marker species which defi nes the NP7/NP8 zonal boundary (Heliolithus rie- delii BRAMLETTE & SULLIVAN) is absent in the west El-Hassana section. The Discoaster mohleri Zone of RO- MEIN (1979) is used here. In the Umm Khushayb section, the FO of Fasciculithus alanii PERCH-NIELSEN occurs at the base of Zone NP6, while this species fi rst appears at the base of Zone NP7/8 in the west El-Hassana section. The recorded Zone NP7/8 is equivalent to the combined NP7 and NP8 Zones of MARTINI (1971), the combined CP6 and CP7 Zones of OKADA & BUKRY (1980), and to the NP7/8 Zone of FARIS & ABU SHAMA (2007) and FARIS & SALEM (2007). 4.2. Planktonic foraminifera 4.2.1. Pseudoguembelina palpebra partial range Zone (CF2) Defi nition: This zone is defi ned as the biostratigraphic in- terval from the last occurrence (LO) of Gansserina gansseri (BOLLI) to the fi rst occurrence (FO) of Plummerita hant- keninoides (BRÖNNIMANN). Occurrence: This zone occupies the upper part of the Sudr Formation in the study area. It’s true thickness is not defi ned because the base of the Sudr Formation is unexposed in the two studied sections. Characteristic species. The most dominant planktonic species recorded in this zone yields a relative high abundance of biserial heterohelicids, while pseudoguembelinids, trise- rial and globotruncanid species are generally very rare (Ta- bles 3 & 4). Remarks: The Micula prinsii Subzone coincides with part of the Pseudoguembelina palpebra and the whole Plum- merita hantkeninoides zones (TANTAWY & KELLER, 2000; KELLER et al., 2007; FAROUK & FARIS, 2008). The absence of Plummerita hantkeninoides and Gansserina gan- sseri zones; in addition to the recognition of Micula prinsii confi rms the presence of the CF2 in the upper part of the Sudr Formation (Fig. 3). 4.2.2. Eoglobigerina edita Partial-range Zone Defi nition: This zone is defi ned as the biostratigraphic inter- val between the LO of Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina (LUTERBACHER & PREMOLI SILVA) and the FO of Praemurica uncinata (BOLLI). Remarks: BERGGREN & PEARSON (2005) subdi- vided the Eoglobigerina edita (P1) Zone from older to younger into the: 1) Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (P1a), 2) Subbotina triloculinoides (P1b) and 3) Globanomalina compressa/Praemurica inconstans (P1c) subzones. In the present study, the P1b Subzone occurs directly on the Maas- trichtian (CF2 Zone) (Fig. 3). Subbotina triloculinoides Lowest-occurrence Subzone (P1b) Defi nition: This subzone represents the biostratigraphic in- terval from the FO of Subbotina triloculinoides (PLUM- MER) to the FO of Globanomalina compressa (PLUM- MER) and/or Praemurica inconstans (SUBBOTINA). Occurrence: The zone is recorded from the basal part of the Beida Formation and only from the Gebel Umm Khushayb section. It is represented by samples 222–224 (0.5 m thick). This subzone is missing in the west El-Hassana section due to the larger amplitude of the unconformity in this section. Characteristic species. Characteristic taxa are frequent, moderately well preserved and include Globoconusa daub- jergensis (BRÖNNIMANN), Globanomalina archeocom- pressa (BLOW), Parasubbotina pseudobulloides (PLUM- Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 153 MER), Parasubbotina trivalis (SUBBOTINA), Subbotina triloculinoides, Praemurica pseudoinconstans (BLOW), Chi loguembelina midwayensis (CUSHMAN) and Ch. mor- sei (KLINE) (Tables 3 & 4). Remarks: At the K/Pg boundary, several changes are observed in the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages, in- cluding the extinction of virtually all Cretaceous species (tropical-subtropical and cosmopolitan), and the fi rst appear- ance of the Danian species. The Cretaceous species present at the base of a transgression of lower Danian sediments are reworked, and are represented by small cosmopolitan surface water dwellers such as Heterohelix and Pseudoguembelina with very rare Rugoglobigerina and Globotruncana spp.. The FOs of Globanomalina compressa and/or Praemu- rica inconstans have been used to determine the base of Sub- zone P1c (OLSSON et al., 1999; BERGGREN & PEAR- SON, 2005). The authors believe that the FO of Glo ba no malina compressa predates that of the FO of Praemurica inconstans, and occurs within Zone P1b. A similar occurrence in Sub- zone P1b was also reported by KELLER (2002). According to BERGGREN & PEARSON (2005), Zone P1b falls be- tween the top part of the Cruciplacolithus tenuis (NP2) Zone, and the basal part of the Chiasmolithus danicus (NP3) Zone. Therefore, the authors believe that the base of Zone P1b should be absent in the Gebel Umm Khushayb due to ab- sences of the Cruciplacolithus tenuis Zone NP2. Globanomalina compressa/Praemurica inconstans Lowest-occurrence Subzone (P1c) Defi nition: The biostratigraphic interval from the FO of Globanomalina compressa and/or Praemurica inconstans and the FO of Praemurica uncinata. Occurrence: This zone is recorded from the lower part of the Dakhla Formation and represented only by samples 7–8 (2.0 m thick) from the west El-Hassana section and it encompasses, samples 224–230 (3.0 m thick) at the Gebel Umm Khushayb section. Characteristic species. In this interval the species are highly abundant and well preserved. The assemblage of this interval is similar to that of the underlying Subzone P1c with the addition of four more species Praemurica inconstans, Globanomalina compressa and Parasubbotina varianta (SUBBOTINA), Morozovella trinidadensis (BOLLI). Remarks: KELLER (2002) subdivided Subzone P1c into two subzones, P1c (1) and P1c (2) based on the fi rst ap- pearance of Praemurica inconstans. In the present study, the FOs of Praemurica inconstans, Globanomalina compressa Figure 3: Standard and alternative planktonic foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil biozonations for the Palaeocene interval. Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 154 Table 3: Stratigraphic distribution of planktonic foraminiferal taxa identifi ed in the west El-Hassana section. Ag e Fo rm at io n Sa m pl e N o. N an no fo ss il Zo ne Pl an kt on ic fo ra m . Z on e G lo bo tr un ca na a eg yp tia ca G lo bo tr un ca na ro se tt a Ru go gl ob ig er in a he xa ca m er at a Ru go gl ob ig er in a m ac ro ce ph al a Ru go gl ob ig er in a ru go sa H et er oh el ix g lo bu lo sa H et er oh el ix d en ta ta H et er oh el ix n av ar ro en sis H et er oh el ix st ria ta Ps eu do gu em be lin a ha ria en sis Ps eu do gu em be lin a co st ul at a Ps eu do te xt ul ar ia e le ga ns G lo bo tr un ca ne lla su bc ar in at us . Su bb ot in a tr ilo cu lin oi se s* Su bb ot in a tr iv ia lis Su bb ot in a tr ia ng ul ar is Su bb ot in a co nc el la ta Su bb ot in a ve la sc oe ns is Pa ra su bb ot in a ps eu do bu llo id es Pa ra su bb ot in a va ria nt a Pa ra su bb ot in a va rio sp ira Pr ae m ur ic a in co ns ta ns * Pr ae m ur ic a un ci na ta * G lo ba no m al in a co m pr es sa G lo ba no m al in a eh re nb er gi G lo ba no m al in a ps eu do m en ar di i* Ch ilo gu em be lin a m id w ay en sis Ch ilo gu em be lin a m or se i Ig or in a pu sil la Ig or in a al be ar i* M or oz ov el la p ra ea ng ul at a M or oz ov el la a ng ul at a* M or oz ov el la co ni co tr un ca ta M or oz ov el la a pa nt he sm a M or oz ov el la p as io ne ns is M or oz ov el la v el as co en sis * M or oz ov el la a cu ta M or oz ov el la p re ae qu a M or oz ov el la a eq ua M or oz ov el la o cc lu sa Ac ar in in a st ra bo ce lla Ac ar in in a m ck an na i Th an et ia n Ta ra w an 45 N P7 /8 P4 b   R R R R R R R R 44   F R R F R R R R 43   F R R F R R R R Se la nd ia n D a k h l a 42 NP6 P4 a   C R R R F R R R R 41 N P5   F R R R F R R R   40   C R R R R R R R R   39 N P4 N Tp 8 P3 b   R   38   R R R VR R R R   37   R R R R   36   R R R R R R R R   D a n i a n 35   R R R R R R R F C R R R R   34   R R R R R A R R R   33 P3 a   R R C R A R   32 N Tp 7   C R R C C R A   31   A R R R C R R R A   30   A R R C A R C R F A   29 P2   A R R A R A C   28   C R R R C C A R C   27   C R C C C A R R   26   A R C F C A R R   25   A R C F C A R   24   C R C F C A R   23   C C F C A R   22   C C R C A R   21     20   C A F R C R R   19   C A R R C R R   18   C A F F C R R   17   R A F F A F R   16   R R A F F A F R   15   C R A C F C C R   14 N Tp 6   C A C C C C   13   C A C C C C   12   C A A C R R   11 C A A C   10 C R R A C C C VR   9 r r R R A C F R VR   8 NP3 P1 c r r r C R A F R R VR   7 r r r r F R A F R R VR   La te st M aa s. Su dr 6 M . p rin si CF 2 A F C R       5 A F R C R F VR     4 VR VR A F R C F               3 VR VR VR VR R A F VR C R C F R   2 A F VR C R   1 R   R R R A F VR C   R VR                                                             A= Abundant C= Common F= Frequent VR= Very Rare R= Rare r=reworked *marker species Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 155 Table 4: Stratigraphic distribution of planktonic foraminiferal taxa identifi ed in the Gebel Umm Khushayb section. Ag e Fo rm at io n Sa m pl e N o. N an no fo ss il Zo ne Pl an kt on ic fo ra m . Z on e G lo bo tr un ca na a eg yp tia ca Ru go gl ob ig er in a he xa ca m er at a Ru go gl ob ig er in a m ac ro ce ph al a Ru go gl ob ig er in a ru go sa H et er oh el ix g lo bu lo sa H et er oh el ix la be llo sa H et er oh el ix n av ar ro en sis H et er oh el ix st ria ta Ps eu do gu em be lin a ha ria en sis Ps eu do gu em be lin a pa lp eb ra Ps eu do gu em be lin a co st ul at a Ps eu do te xt ul ar ia e le ga ns G lo bo tr un ca ne lla su bc ar in at us Su bb ot in a tr ilo cu lin oi se s Su bb ot in a tr iv ia lis Su bb ot in a tr ia ng ul ar is Su bb ot in a ve la sc oe ns is Pa ra su bb ot in a ps eu do bu llo id es Pa ra su bb ot in a va ria nt a Pa ra su bb ot in a va rio sp ira Pr ae m ur ic a in co ns ta ns * Pr ae m ur ic a un ci na ta * G lo ba no m al in a ar ch eo co m pr es sa G lo ba no m al in a co m pr es sa * G lo ba no m al in a eh re nb er gi G lo ba no m al in a ps eu do m en ar di i* Ch ilo gu em be lin a m id w ay en sis Ch ilo gu em be lin a m or se i Ig or in a pu sil la Ig or in a al be ar i* M or oz ov el la p ra ea ng ul at a M or oz ov el la a ng ul at a* M or oz ov el la co ni co tr un ca ta M or oz ov el la a pa nt he sm a M or oz ov el la V el as co en sis * M or oz ov el la a cu ta M or oz ov el la p re ae qu a M or oz ov el la a eq ua M or oz ov el la o cc lu sa Ac ar in in a st ra bo ce lla Ac ar in in a m ck an na i Se la nd ia n B e I d a 251 N P6 P4 a R R R R R R R R R R 250 R R R R R R R R 249 N P5 R R R R R R R R R R 248 R R R R R R R R   247 R R R R R R   246 F R R R C F A R C R   245 R R R R R R R R R   244 N P4 N Tp 8 R R F R F R R   243 P3 b R R R VR R R R R R R R   242 C R VR A R R   D a n i a n 241 C R VR A F F R   240 R R C R F VR R A C R   239 N Tp 7 P3 a   238 R F R R VR R F   237 C VR R R R F F R C   236 P2 R A R   235 C C R   234 N Tp 6 C F   233 C F   232 C F   231 C F       230 A VR A C F F     229 P1 c R R A C F C A   228 C R F C R F     227 N P3 C C F C R F   226 F R C C C C   225 F R A F F C VR   224 P1 b R R A F R VR VR   223 C VR A F R   222 r r R VR A F R   M aa s. Su dr 221 C C 26 CF 2 VR VR F F A R R A VR R R R VR   220   R F F A C R A VR R R C VR                                                         A = Abundant C = Common F = Frequent VR = Very Rare R = Rare r = reworked *marker species and Parasubbotina varianta occur directly above Zone CF2 in the west El-Hassana section, indicating that the oldest Da- nian sediments belong to the P1c (2) Subzone. 4.2.3. Praemurica uncinata Lowest-Occurrence Zone (P2) Defi nition: This is the Biostratigraphic interval between the FO of Praemurica uncinata to the FO of Morozovella angu- lata (WHITE). Occurrence: The zone encompasses the middle part of the Dakhla Formation at the west El-Hassana section and is represented by samples 9–29 (15 m thick). In the Gebel Umm Khushayb section it is recorded from the middle part of the Beida Formation and is represented by samples 229–236 (8 m thick). Characteristic species. The Praemurica uncinata Zone is rich in its faunal content. The most dominant planktonic species recorded in this zone include: Globanomalina com- Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 156 Characteristic species. Morozovella angulata, M. con- icotruncata, Parasubbotina varianta, M. velascoensis (CU- SHMAN), M. occlusa (LOEBLICH & TAPPAN), M. acuta (TOULMIN), M. aequa (CUSHMAN & RENZ), Subbotina velascoensis (CUSHMAN), Subbotina triloculinoides Igo- rina albeari and I. pusillla (BOLLI) are the dominant plank- tonic species in the P 3 b Subzone. Remarks. Morozovella conicotruncata and M. pasion- ensis fi rst appeared within the lower part of this subzone, while M. velascoensis, M. occlusa, M. acuta, M. preaequa and Subbotina velascoensis fi rst occurred within the upper part of the subzone (Tables 3 & 4). 4.2.5. Globanomalina pseudomenardii Total Range Zone (P4) Defi nition: This zone is defi ned as the interval of the total range of the nominated taxon. Occurrence: The zone occupies about 5.5 m of the up- permost part of the measured Beida Formation at Gebel Umm Khushayb and is represented by samples 244–251. It also occurs in the topmost part of the Dakhla Formation, as well as the whole Tarawan Formation at the west El-Hassana section (samples 40–45). Characteristic species. The dominant species in this subzone include angular morozovellids such as Morozovella acuta, M. aequa, M. velascoensis, M. occlusa, Acarinina mckannai (WHITE), A. strabocella (LOEBLICH & TAP- PAN) and Subbotina velascoensis. Remarks. BERGGREN AND PEARSON (2005) sub- divided the P4 Zone into three subzones; Globanomalina pseudomenardii/Parasubbotina variospira (P4a) concurrent- range Subzone; Acarinina subsphaerica (P4b) Partial-range Subzone and Acarinina soldadoensis/Globanomalina pseu- domenardii (P4c) concurrent-range Subzone. In the current study, it was also diffi cult to subdivide the P4 into these bio- zones due to the poor preservation of foraminiferal tests as a result of carbonate dissolution. OLSSON et al. (1999) reported that the FO of Morozo- vella aequa occurs at the lower boundary of the P4c Zone. In the present study, the FO of Morozovella aequa is recog- nized at the top part of P3b Zone, which is equivalent to the top part of the calcareous nannofossil NP4 Zone. A similar occurrence in the P3b Zone was also reported by ARENI- LAS (2012) in the Caravaca section of Spain. 5. STAGE BOUNDARIES 5.1. The Cretaceous/Palaeogene (K/Pg) boundary The K/Pg boundary is marked by an abrupt lithological change that corresponds to the boundary between the Sudr and Dakhla formations at the west El-Hassana section or to the Sudr / Beida formation at Umm Khushayb. Biostrati- graphic analysis (planktonic foraminifera, calcareous nan- nofossils) confi rms that the studied sections are incomplete and discontinuous across the K/P boundary. A small hiatus is suggested by the absence of the Plummerita hantkeni- pressa, Parasubbotina pseudobulloides, Parasubbotina va- rian ta, Subbotina concellata (BLOW), S. trinagularis (WHI TE), S. triloculinoides, S. trivialis, Praemurica unci- nata, P. inconstans and Morozovella praeangulata (BLOW) (Tables 3 & 4). Remarks: Subbotina triangularis and S. concellata fi rst appear within the upper part of this biozone (Tables 3 & 4). STEURBAUT & SZTRÁKOS (2008), mentioned that the Praemurica uncinata Zone falls within the top part of the calcareous nannofossil Zone NTp6 in south-west France. In the present study, it falls within Zone NTp6 and the lower part of Zone NTp7. A similar occurrence was also reported by STEURBAUT et al. (2000) in the Kalaat Senan section, central Tunisia. 4.2.4. Morozovella angulata-Globanomalina pseudomenardii Interval Zone (P3) Defi nition: This includes the interval from the FO of Moro- zovella angulata to the FO of Globanomalina pseudomen- ardii (BOLLI). Occurrence: The biozone is represented by samples 30– 39 (4.5 m thick) in west El-Hassana, and sample 237–243 (7 m thick) from Gebel Umm Khushayb. Various authors have observed that Zone P3 is condensed in this area (e.g. SAMIR, 2002; AL-WOSABI & ABU SHAMA, 2007 in Egypt; VAN ITTERBEEK et al., 2007 in Tunisia). Remarks: BERGGREN et al. (1995), BERGGREN & NORRIS (1997) and OLSSON et al. (1999) re-subdivided P3 Zone into two subzones: the Morozovella angulata-Igo- rina albeari Interval Subzone (P3a) and the Igorina albeari– Globanomalina pseudomenardii Interval Subzone (P3b). In the present study the P3 Zone can also be divided into two subzones. Morozovella angulata-Igorina albeari Interval Subzone (P3a) Defi nition: interval from the FO of the Morozovella angu- lata to the FO of Igorina albeari (CUSHMAN & BERMU- DEZ). Characteristic species. The planktonic assemblage of this subzone is dominated by morozovellids with angular conical chambers throughout their youngest whorl, such as Morozovella conicotruncata (Subbotina), M. Praeangulata, M. angulata (WHITE), and M. praecursoria (MOROZO VA). In addition, other taxa are also present: Subbotina triloculi- noides, Globanomalina compressa, Igorina pusilla and Pra- emurica uncinata (Tables 3 & 4). Remarks: Globanomalina compressa, Praemurica un- cinata, and P. inconstans disappeared in the lower part of this subzone. Igorina albeari/Globanomalina pseudomenardii Interval Subzone (P3b) Defi nition: This represents the Interval between the FO of Igorina albeari and the FO of Globanomalina pseudom- enardii (BOLLI). Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 157 noides, Guembelitria cretacea, Parvularugoglobigerina eu- gubina Zones and Parasubbotina pseudobulloides Subzone. In the west El-Hassana section, the Subbotina triloculinoides Subzone is also missing. Moreover, the upper part of the cal- careous nannofossil Micula prinsii Subzone and the earliest Danian Zones (NP1 and NP2) are missing. This hiatus may be linked to tectonic activity and irregular palaeotopography associated with low sedimentation rates as suggested by FA- ROUK & FARIS (2008). The K/Pg boundary is characterized by the extinction of Cretaceous tropical planktonic foraminifera, and an abrupt change in species richness. However, most of the Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil vanishing species progressively de- crease in abundance within Zone NP4; only the most disso- lution-resistant Cretaceous species (Micula decussata, Watz- naueria barnesae) are still present near the top of Zone NP4. The Cretaceous persistent species progressively increase in abundance above the K/Pg boundary. Cyclagelosphaera re- inhardtii is the most common Cretaceous persistent species in the Palaeocene. 5.2. The Danian/Selandian boundary The global stratotype section and point (GSSP) across the Danian/Selandian (Da/Se) boundary has been defi ned in the Zumaia section, northern Spain close to the FO of F. tym- paniformis, just below the NP4/NP5 boundary and within the planktonic foraminiferal P3b Zone (BERNOALA et al., 2009). Based on calcareous nannofossils, the Danian/Se- landian (Da/Se) boundary is delineated at a level close to the FO of Fasciculithus tympaniformis, just below the NP4/NP5 boundary and it coincides with the End Acme of Braarudo- sphaera bigelowii (BERNOALA et al., 2009). The Lowest Common Occurrence (LCO) of Braarudosphaera, which marked the lithological change at the D/S boundary at the type area in Denmark, can be directly correlated with the abrupt transition from the Danian limestones to the marly Itzurun Fm. at Zumaia (SCHMITZ et al., 1998; BERNAOLA et al., 2009). This event is not applicable to the Tethyan sec- tions because Braarudosphaera was not recorded there (BER NAOLA et al., 2009). The Last Common Occurrence (LCO) of Braarudosphaera seems applicable for placing the base of the Selandian in Denmark, but it is an unreliable event for de lineating the Danian/Selandian boundary in the study sections. Previously in Egypt, the Danian/Selandian was marked as a prominent organic-rich layer with a short-term sea-level fall coinciding with the P3a/P3b boundary, by using the low- est occurrence of the slightly keeled Igorina as a zonal boun- dary criterion (SPEIJER, 2003; OBAIDALLA et al., 2009; SPRONG et al., 2009). In the Qreiya section, the organic- rich layer occurs approximately 1 m above the FOs of Chi- asmolithus edentulus and small fasciculiths (SPRONG et al., 2009). This event bed at the D/S boundary, situated at the base of the Subzone NTp7B, and the equivalent planktonic foraminiferal P3a/P3b zonal boundary, is now considered latest Danian in age (BERNOALA et al., 2009; YOUSSEF, 2009). On the other hand, FARIS & ABU SHAMA (2007) put the Danian/Selandian boundary at the base of Zone NP5. In the present study, it is bracketed within the Zone NTp8 (top- most NP4 equivalent to top part of the planktonic foraminif- era P3b Subzone), at a level close to the First Occurrence (FO) of Morozovella velascoensis, M. occulsa, M. aquea and M. acuta (below) and the FO of Fasciculithus tympaniformis (above) just below the NP4/NP5 boundary in west El-Has- sana and Umm Khushayb sections, is similar to that of the Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Da/Se boundary which has recently been selected at the Zu- maia section. An important global nannofossil event is the onset of the second radiation of Fasciculithus (F. bitectus, F. involutus, F. janii, F. billii and F. ulii). It starts within Zone NTp8 (top- most NP4 and P3b) at a level close to the FO of F. tympani- formis and just below the NP4/NP5 boundary in the study sections. The fi rst continuous occurrence (FCO) of Sphenolithus primus, the marker taxon for the base of Subzone NTp8A of VAROL (1989), is a reliable marker for delineating the Da- nian/Selandian transition (FARIS et al., 2005, QUILLE- VERE et al., 2002). In the present study, the FRO (First Rare Occurrence) of Sphenolithus primus is not a useful global marker because it occurs rarely and sporadically. STEUR- BAUT & SZTRÁKOS (2008) and BERNAOLA et al. (2009) also reported a similar occurrence for the FRO of Spheno- lithus primus. 5.3. The Selandian/Thanetian boundary The base of the Thanetian in its original type area, has been correlated within the upper part of the nannofossil Zone NP6 (AUBRY, 1994; KNOX, 1994). The base of Chron C26n at Zumaian, as a continuous, deep marine and cyclic sequence, offers the possibility of establishing a potential Thanetian Unit Stratotype (DINARÈS-TURELL et al., 2007). It is po- sitioned 30.5 m above the base of the Itzrun Formation, very close to the base of Chron C26N (SCHMITZ et al., 1998). A minor hiatus is proposed at the Selandian/Thanetian boundary as indicated by a condensed interval that marks a lithological change from the calcareous shales of the Dakhla Formation to the limestones of the Tarawan Formation. Therefore, the Selandian/Thanetian boundary in the present study is located at the top of Zone NP6 and within the lower part of the Globanomalina pseudomenardii Zone. No great changes in the nannofossil assemblages have been observed in the west El Hassana section, except for the FO of Dis- coaster mohleri. The Heliolithus kleinpellii Zone (NP6) is not recorded in several localities in Egypt (e.g. BASSIOUNI et al., 1991; FARIS et al., 1999; FARIS & ZAHRAN, 2002; AYYAD et al., 2003). 6. CONCLUSIONS The results obtained can be summarized as follows: 1. An integrated calcareous nannofossil and planktonic fo- raminiferal biostratigraphy has been achieved for the Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 158 Upper Maastrichtian-Palaeocene successions on the west El-Hassana and Umm Khushayb sections, north- central Sinai. The Maastrichtian – Palaeocene material studied in this work consists of siliciclastic/carbonate deposits belonging to four formations: The Sudr, Dakhla, Tarawan formations, and their lateral coeval Beida For- mation. 2. 44 calcareous nannofossil and 31 planktonic foraminif- eral taxa are identifi ed with moderate to good preserva- tion and relatively high diversity. These microfossil as- semblages allowed subdivision of the study sections into one subzone and fi ve calcareous nannofossil zones: Mic- ula prinsii Subzone (CC26c), Chiasmolithus danicus Zone (NP3), Ellipsolithus macellus Zone (NP4), Fas- ciculithus tympaniformis Zone (NP5), Heliolithus klein- pellii Zone (NP6), Discoaster mohleri Zone (NP7/8); and fi ve planktonic foraminiferal zones and four sub- zones; Pseudoguembelina palpebra Zone (CF2), Eoglo- bigerina edita (P1) Zone, Praemurica uncinata Zone (P2), Morozovella angulata-Globanomalina pseudom- enardii Zone (P3), Globanomalina pseudomenardii Zone (P4). Zone P1 can be subdivided into the Subbotina triloculinoides Subzone (P1b), and the Globanomalina compressa/Praemurica inconstans Subzone (P1c). Zone P3 is subdivided into the Morozovella angulata-Igorina albeari Subzone (P3a), and the Igorina albeari/Globa- nomalina pseudomenardii Subzone (P3b). 3. Biostratographic analyses of the two studied sections based on planktonic foraminifera and calcareous nan- nofossils, indicate that deposition of the Latest Maas- trichtian to Early Danian sediments was interrupted by erosion and or non-deposition related to tectonic activ- ity. As a result, some planktonic foraminifera (Plummer- ita hantkeninoides, Guembelitria cretacea, Parvularu- goglobigerina eugubina biozones and, Parasubbotina pseudobulloides Subzone and their equivalent calcare- ous nannofossils (top part of CC26c, NP1 and NP2 zones) are missing. 4. The new-Palaeocene calcareous nannfossil taxa fi rst ap- pear at the base of Zone NP3 of early Danian age. They progressively increase upwards and are more common than the Cretaceous vanishing species in Zone NP3 and NP4. 5. According to the Palaeocene Zonal Scheme of VAROL (1989); the nannofossil Zone NP4 of MARTINI (1971), can be divided into three subzones; NTp6, NTp7 and NTp8 in the west El-Hassana and Umm Khushayb sec- tions. A small hiatus is observed at the NP3/NP4 zonal boundary as suggested by the absence of the NTp5B Subzone and NTp5C and most probably the lowermost part of Zone NTp6. 6. The onset of a second diversifi cation of the genus Fas- ciculithus, represented by F. bitectus, F. involutus, F. ja- nii, F. billii and F. ulii, begins within Zone NTp8 and just below the NP4/NP5 boundary in El Hassana and Umm Khushayb sections. This radiation marks the Da- nian/Selandian boundary. Based on planktonic fora mi- nifera, the Danian/Selandian boundary lies with the ba- sal part of the P3b Subzone. 7. The Selandian/Thanetian boundary is placed at the con- tact between the Dakhla and Tarawan formations at west El-Hassana, approximately at the top of calcareous na- nofossil Zone NP6 within the equivalent planktonic fo- raminiferal Zone P4. A minor hiatus was observed at this boundary as indicated by the prominent lithological chan ge from the calcareous shale of the Dakhla Forma- tion to the limestones of the Tarawan Formation and the very condensed calcareous nannofossil Zone NP6. REFERENCES ALLAM, A. & KHALIL, H. (1988): Geology and stratigraphy of the Arif El-Naqa area, Sinai, Egypt.– Egypt. J. Geol., 32, 199–218. ALVAREZ, L.W., ALVAREZ, W., ASARO, F. & MICHEL, H.V. (1984): The end of the Cretaceous: sharp boundary or gradual transition.– Science, 223, 1183–1186. doi:10.1126/science.223.4641.1183 ALVAREZ, L.W., ALVAREZ, W., ASARO, F. & MICHEL, H.V. (1980): Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinc- tion: experimental results and theoretical interpretation.– Science, 208, 1095–1108. AL-WOSABI, K. & ABU SHAMA, A.Z. (2007): Planktonic foraminif- eral and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy around the K/P boundary at section, west central Sinai, Egypt.– Egypt. J. Paleont., 7, 87–115. ARENILLAS, I. (2011): Patterns of spatio-temporal distribution as cri- teria for the separation of planktic foraminiferal species across the Danian-Selandian transition in Spain.– Acta Palaeont. Polon., 57/2, 401–402. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0076 AUBRY, M.-P. (1994): The Thanetian Stage in NW Europe and its sig- nifi cance in terms of global events.– GFF, 116, 43–44. AWAD, G.H. & GHOBRIAL, M.G. (1966): Zonal stratigraphy of the Kharga Oasis.– Geological Survey of Egypt, Cairo, Paper, 34, 77 p. AYYAD, S.N., FARIS, M., EL NAHASS, H.A. & SAAD, K.A.A. (2003): Planktonic foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil bio- stratigraphy from the Upper Cretaceous-Lower Eocene successions in northeast Sinai, Egypt.– In: 3rd International Conference on the Geology of Africa, Assiut University, 1, 649–683. BACKMAN, J. (1986): Late Palaeocene to middle Eocene calcareous nannofossil biochronologyfrom the Shatsky Rise, Walvis Ridge and Italy.– Palaeog., Palaeocl., Palaeoec., 57, 43–59. BASSIOUNI, M.A., FARIS, M. & SHARABY, S. (1991): Late Maas- trichtian and Palaeocene calcareous nannofossils from Ain Dabadib section, NW Kharga Oasis, Egypt.– Qatar Univ. Sci. J., 11, 357–375. BERGGREN, W.A. & PEARSON, P.N. (2005): A revised tropical to sub tropical Palaeogene planktonic foraminiferal zonation.– J. Fo- ram. Res., 35, 279–314. doi:10.2113/35.4.279 BERGGREN, W.A., AUBRY, M.-P., VAN FOSSEN, M., KENT, D.V., NORRIS, R.D. & QUILLEVERE, F. (2000): Integrated Palaeocene calcareous plankton magnetobiochronology and stable isotope stra- tigraphy: DSDP Site 384 (NW Atlantic Ocean).– Palaeog., Palaeo- cl., Palaeoec., 159, 1–51. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00031-6 BERGGREN, W.A., KENT, D.V., SWISHER, C.C.I. & AUBRY, M.-P. (1995): A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratig- raphy.– In: HARDENBOL, J. (ed.): Geochronology, time scales and global stratigraphic correlation, Society of Economic Paleontolo- gists and Mineralogists, Special Publication, 54, 129–212. BERGGREN, W.A. & NORRIS, R.D. (1997): Biostratigraphy, phylog- eny, and systematics of Palaeocene planktic foraminifera.– Micro- paleontolgy, 43 (Supplement 1), 1–116. doi:10.2307/1485988 Faris and Farouk: Integrated biostratigraphy of two Upper Maastrichtian – Palaeocene successions in north-central Sinai, Egypt Geologia Croatica 159 BERNAOLA, G. & MONECHI, S. (2007): Calcareous nannofossil ex- tinction and survivorship across the Cretaceous−Palaeogene bound- ary at Walvis Ridge (ODP Hole 1262C, South Atlantic Ocean).– Palaeog., Palaeocl., Palaeoec., 255, 132–156. BERNAOLA, G., MARTIN-RUBIO, M. & BACETA, J.I. (2009): New high resolution calcareous nannofossil analysis across the Danian- Selandian transition at the Zumaia section: comparisons with South Tethys and Danish sections.– Geol. Acta, 7, 79–92. BOLLE, M.-P. & ADATTE, T. (2001): Palaecoene-early Eocene climat- ic evolution in the Tethyan realm: clay mineral evidence.– Clay Min., 36, 249–261. CLEMEN, W.A., ARCHIVALD, J.D. & HICKEY, L.J. (1981): Out with a whimper not a bang.– Paleobiology, 7, 293–298. COURTILLOT, V., FERAUD, G., MALUSKI, H., VANDAMME, D., MOREAU, M.G. & BESSE, J. (1988): Deccan fl ood basalts and the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary.– Nature, 333, 843–846. doi: 10.1038/333843a0 DINARES-TURELL, J., BACETA, J.I., BERNAOLA, G., ORUE- ETXEBARRIA, X. & PUJALTE, V. (2007): Closing the Mid-Pal- aeocene gap: Toward a complete astronomically tuned Palaeocene Epoch and Selandian and Thanetian GSSPs at Zumaia (Basque Ba- sin, W Pyrenees).– Earth Plan. Sci. Lett., 262, 450–467. doi:10.1016/ j.epsl.2007.08.008 EL-DEEB, W.Z., FARIS, M. & MANDOUR, M.M. (2000): Foraminif- eral and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Palaeocene in North Central Sinai, Egypt.– Annals of the Geological Survey of Egypt, 23, 103–118. EL-NADY, H. & SHAHIN, A. (2001): Planktonic foraminiferal biosta- tigraphy and palaeobathymetry of the Late Cretaceous-Early Ter- tia ry succession at northeast Sinai, Egypt.– Egypt. J. Paleont., 1, 193–227. FARIS, M. & ZAHRAN, E. (2002): Calcareous nannofossil biostratig- raphy of the Late Palaeocene/Early Eocene of El-Bruk area, North Central Sinai.– Egypt. J. Paleont., 2, 359–369. FARIS, M., ABD EL-HAMEED, A.T., MARZOUK, A. & GHANDOUR, I.M. (1999): Early Palaeogene calcareous nannofossil and plank- tonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy in Central Egypt.– N. Jahrb. Ge- ol. Paläont. Abhandl., 213/2, 261–288. FARIS, M. & ABU SHAMA, A.M. (2007): Nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Palaeocene –Eocene succession in the Thamad area, East Central Sinai, Egypt.– Micropaleont., 1–2, 127–144. doi: 10.2113/ gsmicropal.53.1-2.127 FARIS, M., AYYAD, S.N., EL NAHASS, H.A., & AL WOSABI, KH.A. (2005): Early Palaeogene stages and their boundaries in Sinai, Egypt.– In: The fourth International Conference on the Geology of Africa, Assiut University, Egypt, 2, 753–768. FARIS, M., EL-DEEB, W. & MANDOUR, M. (2000): Biostratigraphy of some Upper Cretaceous/Lower Eocene successions in North and Southwest Sinai, Egypt.– Annals of the Geological Survey of Egypt, 23, 135–161. FARIS, M. & SALEM, R.F. (2007): Palaeocene-Early Eocene calcare- ous nannofossil biostratigraphy in West Central Sinai, Egypt.– In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference Geology of Sinai for Develop- ment, Ismailia, 1–14. FAROUK, S. & FARIS, M. (2008): Campanian to Eocene planktic fo- raminiferal and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy in the syn- clinal areas around Gebel Libni, North Sinai, Egypt.– Earth Sci. Ser., 22, 187–201. GARDAN, S. (2002): Late Maastrichtian to early Danian calcareous nannofossils at Elles, Northwest Tunisia: A tale of one million years across the K-T boundary.– Palaeog., Palaeocl., Palaeoec., 178, 211–231. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00397-2 GHORAB, M.A. (1961): Abnormal stratigraphic features in Ras Gharib oil fi eld.– In: 3rd Arab Petroleum Congress, Alexandria, Egypt, p. 10. HALLAM, A. (1987): End-Cretaceous mass extinction event: argument for terrestrial causation.– Science, 238, 1237–1242. KELLER, G., ADATTE, T., TANTAWY, A.A., BERNER, Z., STINNES- BECK, W., STUEBEN, D. & LENAZA, H.A. (2007): High stress late Maastrichtian early Danian palaeoenvironment in the Neuque´n Basin, Argentina.– Cretac., Res., 28, 939–960. KELLER, G. (2002): Guembelitria-dominated late Maastrichtian planktic foraminiferal assemblages mimic early Danian in central Egypt.– Marine Micropaleont., 47, 71–99. doi:10.1016/S0377- 8398(02) 00116 -0 KENNETT, J.P. & STOTT, L.D. (1991): Abrupt deep-sea warming, pa- leoceanographic changes and benthic extinction at the end of the Palaeocene.– Nature, 353, 225–229. KNOX, R.W. (1994): The age and regional context of the Thanetian stra- totype sections of the SE England.– GFF, 116, 55–56. doi:10.1038/ 353225a0 LAMOLDA, M.A. & GOROSTIDI, A. (1992): Nannofossil stratigraph- ic record in the Upper Maastrichtian–Lowermost Danian at Zuma- ya (Northern Spain).– In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Nan- noplankton Association Conference. Mem. Sci. Geol., 43, 149–161. LEES, J.A. (2002): Calcareous nannofossils biogeography illustrates pa- laeoclimate change in the Late Cretaceous Indian Ocean.– Cretac. Res., 23, 537–634. doi:10.1006/cres.2003.1021 LI, L. & KELLER, G. (1998): Maastrichtian climate, productivity and faunal turnovers in planktic foraminifera in South Atlantic DSDP sites 525 and 21.– Marine Micropaleont., 33, 55–86. LÜNING, S., MARZOUK, A.M. & KUSS, J. (1998): The Palaeocene of Central East Sinai, Egypt: ‘Sequence stratigraphy' in monotonous hemipelagites.– J. Foram. Res., 28/1, 19–39. MARTINI, E. (1971): Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nan- noplankton zonation. – In: FARINACCI, A. (ed.): Proceedings of the Second Planktonic Conference, Edizioni Tecnoscienza, Rome, 2, 739–785. MARZOUK, A.M. & LÜNING, S. (1998): Comparative biostratigraphy of calcareous nannofossils and planktonic foraminifera in the Pal- aeocene of Eastern Sinai, Egypt.– N. Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol., Ab- handl., 207/1, 77–105. MCLEAN, D.M. (1982): Deccan volcanism and the Cretaceous – Ter- tiary transition scenario: a unifying causal mechanism.– Syllogeus, 39, 143–144. MCLEAN, D.M. (1985): Deccan Traps mantle degassing in the terminal Cre taceous marine extinctions.– Cretac. Res., 6, 235–259. doi: 10.1016/0195 -6671(85)90048-5 MONECHI, S., BLEIL, U. & BACKMAN, J. (1985): Magnetobiochro- nology of late Cretaceous-Palaeogene and late Cenozoic pelagic sedimentary sequences from the Northwest Pacifi c (Deep Sea Drill- ing Project Leg 86, Site577).– In: Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Offi ce, Washington, 787–797. OBAIDALLA, N.A., EL-DAWY, M.H. & KASSAB, A.S. (2009): Bi- ostratigraphy and paleoenvironment of the Danian/Selandian (D/S) transition in the Southern Tethys: A case study from north Eastern Desert, Egypt.– J. Afr. Earth Sci., 53, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jafrear- sci.2008.07.004 OKADA, H. & BUKRY, D. (1980): Supplementary modifi cation and introduction of code numbers to the low latitude coccolith biostrati- graphic zonation (Bukry, 1973, 1975).– Marine Micropaleont., 5, 321–325. doi:10.1016/0377-8398(80)90016-X OLSSON, R.K., HEMLEBEN, C., BERGGREN, W.A. & HUBER, B.T. (1999): Atlas of Palaeocene planktonic foraminifera.– Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 85, 1–252. ORUE-ETXEBARRIA, X., APELLANIZ, E. & CABALLERO, F. (2007): Discrepancies in planktic foraminifera biostratigraphies across the Danian/Selandian transition at Zumaia: no poor preser- Geologia Croatica 65/2Geologia Croatica 160 vation, but taxonomic different concepts.– In: Abstracts of the In- ternational Workshop of the Palaeocene Working Group (Zumaia, Basque Country), 25–27. PERCH-NIELSEN, K. (1985a): Mesozoic calcareous nannofossils.– In: BOLLI, H. M., SAUNDERS, J. B. & PERCH-NIELSEN, K. (eds.): Plankton Stratigraphy, Cambridge University Press, 329–426. PERCH-NIELSEN, K. (1985b): Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils.– In: BOLLI, H.M., SAUNDERS, J.B. & PERCH-NIELSEN, K. (eds.): Plankton Stratigraphy, Cambridge University Press, 427–554. POSPICHAL, J.J. (1994): Calcareous nannofossils at the K–T boundary, El Kef: no evidence for stepwise, gradual, or sequential extinc- tions.– Geology, 22, 99–102. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022< 0099:CNATKT>2.3.CO;2 QUILLEVERE, F., AUBRY, M.-P., NORRIS, R.D. & BERGGREN, W.A. (2002): Palaeocene oceanography of the eastern subtropical Indian Ocean: an integrated magnetostratigraphic and stable isotope study of ODP Hole 761B (Wombat Plateau).– Palaeogeog., Palaeo- clim., Palaeoec., 184/4, 371–405. ROMEIN, A.J.T. (1979): Lineages in early Palaeogene calcareous nan- noplankton.– Utrecht Micropalaeont. Bull., 22, 1–230. SAID, R. (1961): Tectonic framework of Egypt and its infl uence on dis- tribution of foraminifera.– AAPG Bulletin, 45, 198–218. SAID, R. (1962): The geology of Egypt.– Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 370 p. SAMIR, A. (2002): Biostratigraphy and paleoenvironment changes in the Upper Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene deposits of Gabal Samra section, southwestern Sinai, Egypt.– Egypt. J. Paleont., 2, 1–40. SCHMITZ, B., MOLINA, E., VON SALIS, K. (1998): The Zumaya sec- tion in Spain: a possible global stratotype section for the Selandian and Thanetian Stages.– Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 36, 35–42. SISSINGH, W. (1977): Biostratigraphy of Cretaceous calcareous nan- noplancton.– Geologie en Mijnbouw, 56, 37–65. SPEIJER, R.P. (2003): Danian–Selandian sea-level change and biotic excursion on the southern Tethyan margin (Egypt).– In: WING, S. L., GINGERICH, P.D., SCHMITZ, B. & THOMAS, E. (eds.): Cau ses and Consequences of Globally Warm Climates in the Ear- ly Palaeogene, Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 369, 275–290. SPRONG, J., SPEIJER, R.P. & STEURBAUT, E. (2009): Biostratigra- phy of the Danian/Selandian transition in the southern Tethys: Spe- cial reference to the lowest occurrence of planktic foraminifera Ig- orina albeari.– Geol. Acta, 7/1–2, 63–77. STAMPFLI, G., FAVRE, P., PILLEVUIT, A. & VANNAY, J. (1995): The Neotethys-East Mediterranean Basin connection.– In: 2nd Interna- tional Symposium The geology of the Eastern Mediterranean re- gion, Abstract book, p. 17. STEURBAUT, E., DUPUIS, C., ARENILLAS, I., MOLINA, E. & MAT- MATI, M.F. (2000): The Kalaat Senan section in Central Tunisia: a potential reference section for the Danian/Selandian boundary.– In: SCMITZ, B., SUNDQUIST, B. & ANREASSON, F.P. (eds.): Early Palaeogene Warm Climates and Biosphere Dynamics, GFF, 122/1, 158.160. doi:10.1080/11035890001221158 STEURBAUT, E. & SZTRAKOS, K. (2008): Danian/Selandian bound- ary criteria and North Sea Basin. Tethys correlations based on cal- careous nannofossil and foraminiferal trends in SW France. Marine Micropaleont., 67, 1–29. STROUGO, A. (1986): The Velascoensis event: A signifi cant episode of tectonic activity in the Egyptian Palaeogene.– N. Jahrb. Geol. Pa- läont., Abhand., 173, 253–269. TANTAWY, A.A. & KELLER, G. (2004): Biotic effects of volcanism on calcareous nannofossils and planktic foraminifera: Ninetyeast Ridge, Indian Ocean.– Egypt. J. Paleont., 3, 1–23. TANTAWY, A.A., KELLER, G., ADATTE, T., STINNESBECK, W., KA SSAB, A. & SCHULTE, P. (2001): Maastrichtian to Palaeocene depositional environment of the Dakhla Formation, Western Desert, Egypt: Sedimentology, mineralogy, and integrated micro- and mac- rofossil biostratigraphies.– Cretac. Res., 22, 795–827. doi:10.1006/ cres.2001.0291 TANTAWY, A.A., ZAKHERA, M. & KASSAB, A. (2003): Biostratig- raphy and paleoecology of the Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene Se- quence, northern scarpe of Farafra Oasis, Western Desert.– In: Ab- stracts of the 3rd Annual Meeting of Paleontological Society of Egyptian, p. 6–7. THIERSTEIN, H.R. (1981): Late Cretaceous nannoplankton and the change at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary.– In: WARME, J.E, DOUGLAS, R.G. & WINTERER, E.L. (eds.): The Deep Sea Drill- ing Project: a Decade of Progress, SEPM Special Publication, 32, 355–394. VAN ITTERBEECK, SPRONG, J., DUPUIS, C., SPEIJER, R.P. & STEURBAUT, E. (2007): Danian/Selandian boundary stratigraphy and ostracod records from Sidi Nasseur, Tunisia.– Marine Micro- paleont., 62, 211–234. VAROL, O. (1989): Palaeocene calcareous nannofossil biostratigra- phy.– In: CRUX, J.A. & VAN HECK, S.E. (eds.): Nannofossils and their Applications, British Micropalaeontological Society, 12, 267–310. WORSLEY, T. & MARTINI, E. (1970): Late Maastrichtian nannoplank- ton provinces.– Nature, 225, 1242–1243. YOUSSEF, A.M. (2009): High resolution calcareous nannofossil bios- tratigraphy and paleoecology across the Latest Danian event (LDE) in central Eastern Desert, Egypt.– Marine Micropaleont., 72, 111– 128. doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2009.03.007 Manuscript received June 22, 2011 Revised manuscript accepted March 04, 2012 Available online June 29, 2012