Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 1 of 24 RESEARCH ARTICLE Organic geochemistry of an Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous mudstone succession in a narrow graben setting, Wollaston Forland Basin, North-East Greenland Jørgen A. Bojesen-Koefoed1* , Peter Alsen2 , Morten Bjerager3 , Jussi Hovikoski3,4 , Peter N. Johannessen5, Henrik Nøhr-Hansen2 , Henrik I. Petersen2 , Stefan Piasecki3,6,7 , Henrik Vosgerau3 1Department for Mapping and Mineral Resources, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Department for Geo-energy and Storage, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Department for Geophysics and Sedimentary Basins, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark; 4Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), Espoo, Finland; 5Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), now retired; 6Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7Retired Abstract The Oxfordian–Ryazanian was a period of widespread deposition of marine organic-rich mud- stones in basins formed during the early phases of the rifting that heralded the formation of the present-day North Atlantic. Occasionally, uninterrupted deposition prevailed for 20 million years or more. Today, mudstones of this time interval are found on the shelves bordering the North Atlantic and adjacent areas from Siberia to the Netherlands. Here, we report data on two fully cored boreholes from Wollaston Forland (North-East Greenland, approx. 74° N), which represent an unin- terrupted succession from the upper Kimmeridgian to the Hauterivian. The boreholes record basin development at two different positions within an evolving halfgraben, located at the margin of the main rift, and thus partially detached from it. Although the overall depositional environment remained an oxygen-restricted deep-shelf setting, rifting-related changes can be followed through the succession. The Kimmeridgian was a period of eustatic highstand and records the incipient rifting with a transgressive trend straddling the transition to the lower Volgian by a gradual change from deposits with high levels of total organic carbon (TOC) and kerogen rich in allochthonous organic matter to deposits with lower TOC and a higher proportion of autochthonous organic matter. This is followed by a slight regressive trend with lower TOC and increased proportions of allochthonous organic matter until rifting culminated in the middle Volgian–Ryazanian, indicated by increasing autochthonous organic matter and higher TOC, which prevailed until basin ventila- tion occurred towards the end of the Ryazanian. The properties of the reactive kerogen fraction remained rather stable irrespective of TOC, underlining the effect of terrigenous matter input for TOC. These variations are also captured by biological markers and stable carbon isotopes. The deposits are very similar to equivalent successions elsewhere in the proto-North Atlantic region, albeit the proportion of terrigenous kerogen is greater. *Correspondence: jbk@geus.dk Received: 20 Apr 2022 Revised: 06 Jan 2023 Accepted: 10 Jan 2023 Published: 21 Dec 2023 Keywords: North-East Greenland, organic geochemistry, paleogeography, source rock, Upper Jurassic Abbreviations: b. rfl.: below reference level GC: gas chromatography GEUS: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland HI: Hydrogen Index HIlive: average HI of the live kerogen fraction MS: mass spectrometry mmboe: million barrels of oil equivalent NSO: nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen PI: Production Index SRA: Source Rock Analyzer TC: total carbon TD: total depth Tmax: temperature at maximum rate of pyrolysate generation during Rock-Eval or SRA analysis (°C) TOC: total organic carbon TS: total sulphur UEG: Ultimate Expulsion Gas UEO: Ultimate Expulsion Oil UEP: Ultimate Expulsion Potential GEUS Bulletin (eISSN: 2597-2154) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal published by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). This article is distributed under a CC BY 4.0 licence, permitting free redistribution, and reproduction for any purpose, even commercial, provided proper citation of the original work. Author(s) retain copyright. Edited by: Jon R. Ineson (GEUS, Denmark) Reviewed by: Erdem Idiz (University of Oxford, UK), Iain Scotchman (Scotchman Geochemistry Services Ltd, UK) Funding: See page 22 Competing interests: See page 22 Additional files: None provided 1. Introduction Marine shales of Oxfordian–Ryazanian age constitute the most important source rocks for petroleum in the prospective basins of the North Atlantic region, which include the basins of the greater North Sea area, the Barents Shelf, and the basins west of Ireland and the Shetland Islands as well as the basins of western Siberia. On the western side of the Atlantic this also includes https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-2769 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-9054 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-8857 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-8713 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-8104 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6606-7062 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-859x https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7582-5360 mailto:jbk@geus.dk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 2 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG the Jeanne d’Arc and Flemish Pass basins off eastern Canada, and probably untested basins off East and North-East Greenland. These deposits have been exten- sively studied (e.g. Von der Dick et al. 1989; Miller 1990; Chakhmakhchev et al. 1994; Klemme 1994; Telnæs et al. 1994; Fowler & McAlpine 1995; Isaksen & Ledje 2001; Ine- son et al. 2003; Justwan & Dahl 2005; Justwan et al. 2005, 2006a,b; Petersen et al. 2010; Scotchman et al. 2016). Age- equivalent deposits crop out onshore North-East Green- land. However, irrespective of their importance for the general understanding of the most important petroleum system of Northwest Europe, published in-depth studies of the nature and petroleum potential of the equivalent North- East Greenland succession are scarce. Exceptions include papers by Requejo et al. (1989), Christiansen et al. (1992), Strogen et al. (2005) and Bojesen-Koefoed et al. (2018). Over the years 2008–2010, the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) drilled three fully cored boreholes to depths of more than 200 m to penetrate the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous mudstone succession in East and North-East Greenland. The successions drilled are partially time equivalents of the Kimmeridge Clay For- mation of the Wessex Basin, UK, as well as of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous petroleum source-rock suc- cessions of the North Sea and North Atlantic basins, where they are known under a variety of different local names, see for instance Ineson et al. (2003). The Kimmeridge Clay Formation has been penetrated by cored boreholes close to its type section in Dorset (Morgans-Bell et al. 2001). How- ever, the East and North-East Greenland boreholes offer an opportunity to study nearly the full Oxfordian to Ryaza- nian succession in an area remote from other studied out- crops and wells. The first of these boreholes to be drilled was the Blokelv-1 in Jameson Land, which covers the suc- cession from the Oxfordian to the lower Volgian (see Ine- son & Bojesen-Koefoed 2018). The second and third of the planned boreholes, the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1, respectively, were drilled in northern Wollaston Forland, North-East Greenland in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The Brorson Halvø-1 drill site is situated approximately 10 km north-east of the Rødryggen-1 drillsite, near the uplifted eastern crest of the fault block defined by the Permpas fault to the west and the Hühnerbjerg fault to the east (Fig. 1; Surlyk 1978). The Rødryggen-1 borehole is located near the centre of the same block. The main target of the drilling in both cores was the same Kimmeridgian–Ryazanian black mudstone succes- sion with the primary objective being to delineate the lat- eral development in facies of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous mudstone succession in an evolving half- graben system in the Wollaston Forland area. The objec- tive of this paper is to present an overview of the organic geochemistry of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous mudstone succession in the Wollaston Forland Basin, based on new evidence from the Rødryggen-1 and Bror- son Halvø- 1 boreholes (Fig. 1). Details of the drilling, sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø- 1 boreholes can be found in Bojesen- Koefoed et al. (2023, this volume), Hovikoski et al. (2023b, this volume) and Alsen et al. (2023, this volume). 2. Geological setting and stratigraphy of the drilled succession The Jurassic–Cretaceous Wollaston Forland Basin devel- oped in response to rifting in the proto-North Atlantic to the east of the basin. The Wollaston Forland Basin is over- all a system of westerly tilted fault blocks or half-grabens bounded to the west by the Dombjerg Fault and to the east by the Hühernbjerg Fault (Figs 1, 2; Surlyk, 1978, 2003; Fyhn et al. 2021a). The basin is internally segmented into several subbasins defined by roughly north–south trending normal faults, which were active during various phases of the basin development (Fyhn et  al. 2021a,b; Hovikoski et al. 2023a,b and references therein). The two drill-cores penetrate the Kimmeridgian – lower Barremian succession, which includes four litho- stratigraphic units (Fig. 3): (1) the Bernbjerg Formation, (2) the Lindemans Bugt Formation, Storsletten Member (Alsen et al. 2023, this volume), (3) the Palnatokes Bjerg Formation (the Albrechts Bugt Member and the Rødryg- gen Member), and (4) the Stratumbjerg Formation (Bjerager et al. 2020; Surlyk et al. 2021). The upper Oxfordian – lower Volgian Bernbjerg For- mation is up to 500–600 m thick and represents a tec- tonically affected muddy shelf succession that crops out from Store Koldewey in the north to Traill Ø (Ø mean- ing island) in the South (Surlyk & Clemmensen 1983; Surlyk 2003; Surlyk et  al. 2021). A major rift episode starting in the Volgian terminated the regionally con- tinuous shelf accumulation and resulted in accelerated tilted fault-block development and basin segmentation that lasted until the Barremian in the western part of the area (Surlyk 1978, 1984, 1990, 2003; Piasecki et al. 2020). As a result, the basin geometry changed into a series of narrow, 10–30 km wide, S–N-oriented basins that were strongly westwards tilted. In the most proxi- mal fault block, the Volgian–Ryazanian syn-rift interval is characterised by major conglomeratic submarine fan- delta systems (Lindemans Bugt Formation; Rigi Mem- ber; Surlyk 1978; Henstra et  al. 2016), which graded into heterolithic and mud-dominated deposits in more distal areas (the Laugeites Ravine, Niesen and Storslet- ten Members). The areal distribution of the Lindemans Bugt Formation is limited to north-eastern Clavering Ø, north-western Wollaston Forland, eastern Th. Thomsen Land (named  for the ethnographer Thomas Thomsen, known as Th. Thomsen (Higgins 2010)) and south-west https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 3 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 1 Location maps. Overview map (left). Positions of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes on Wollaston Forland are shown on a simplified geological map (right). K.F.: Kuhn fault; P.F.: Permpas Fault; H.F.: Hühnerbjerg Fault; D.F.: Dombjerg Fault. The Dombjerg Fault was the main fault to control the position of the coastline during the Late Jurassic. The Permpas–Hühnerbjerg block(s) was bounded by the Kuppel and Hühnerbjerg Faults, which probably represented the main controlling faults in the block that is studied here, during the Late Jurassic. Reproduced from Bojesen-Koefoed et al. (2023, this volume). Fig. 2 Conceptual, approximately SW–NE-oriented cross-section of Clavering Ø – Wollaston Forland, showing multiple westward-tilted fault blocks. Modified from Birkelund & Perch-Nielsen (1976) and Vischer (1943). 18°W 16°W 76°N 72°N 22°W 20°W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ G re en la nd Traill Ø Hochstetter Forland Store Koldewey Wollaston Forland Jameson Land 100 km 26°W 22°W24°W28°W 26°W 24°W " 74°45'N 74°50'N 74°55'N 74°40ʹN 74°35ʹN 74°20ʹN 74°15ʹN 74°25ʹN 74°30ʹN 19°30'W 19°0'W 20°0ʹW20°30ʹW Brorson Halvø-1 Albrecht Bugt Daneborg P. F. K .F . H .F . Rødryggen-1 W O L L A S T O N F O R L A N D K U H N Ø Young Sund CLAVERING Ø S abine Ø Falske Bugt Major dykes/sills Faults Plateau lavas Ice Lakes Rivers Quaternary Stratumbjerg and Fosdalen Fms Palnatokes Bjerg Fm Lindemans Bugt Fm Bernbjerg Fm Pelion, Jakobsstigen and Payer Dal Fms Permian Pre-Caledonian basement 10 km Palaeogene Borehole D .F . Cretaceous Jurassic Triassic Permian Fault Inferred deep-seated fault ■ ■ Pro�le Rudis Bugt Louis Elv CLAVERING Ø Skillegletscher Young Sund WOLLASTON FORLAND Blæsedalen m 0 4000 Plateau basalt Cretaceous Jurassic Triassic Upper Permian Carboniferous and Lower Permian Caledonian Basement Sea https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 4 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Kuhn Ø (Surlyk 1978; Surlyk et al. 2021). The formation is wedge-shaped in a west–east direction and is estimated to reach a maximum thickness of 2 km. The Valanginian stage is characterised by waning rift activity in the study area (late syn-rift) and transgres- sion, whereas rifting continued in the axial areas to the east (Surlyk 1978, 1984, 2003; Surlyk & Korstgård 2013; Hovikoski et al. 2018). The Palnatokes Bjerg Formation was deposited during this period. The Formation crops out in Wollaston Forland, Kuhn Ø, Hochstetter Forland and Traill Ø (Surlyk 1978; Surlyk et al. 2021). Like the Lin- demans Bugt Formation, the formation shows variable thickness in west–east transect and reaches a maxi- mum thickness of 600 m. It includes the coarse-grained gravity flow deposits of the Young Sund and Falskebugt Members, and the fossiliferous fine-grained Albrechts Bugt and Rødryggen Members. The cored interval penetrates both fine-grained members and the recent biostratigraphic data suggest a Valanginan to Hauteriv- ian age for these deposits (Alsen & Mutterlose 2009; Pauly et al. 2012; Möller et al. 2015). In the Brorson Halvø core, the Palnatokes Bjerg Formation is gradationally overlain by a thin inter- val of upper Hauterivian sub-storm-wave-base bio- turbated mudstones of the Stratumbjerg Formation (Bjerager et  al. 2020). This formation crops out from Traill Ø in the south to Store Koldewey in the north and reaches  its maximum thickness of 270 m in the Brorson Halvø area. 3. Samples and methods Samples used for the present study include material from the fully cored Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes. The Rødryggen-1 borehole reached a total depth (TD) of 234.66 m below terrain, with a core recovery of 99%. The lithostratigraphic units encountered include  the Bernbjerg Formation (Kimmeridgian – lower Volgian), the Lindemans Bugt Formation (lower Volgian – upper Ryaza- nian) and the Palnatokes Bjerg Formation, Albrechts Bugt Member (upper Ryazanian – upper Valanginian; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). The succession penetrated by Fig. 3 Stratigraphic models of the Wollaston Forland – Kuhn Ø area. Left: the original stratigraphy by Surlyk (2003). Right: the revised stratigraphy after drilling of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes and incorporating changes introduced by Surlyk et al. (2021). The revised succession is much more complete and richer in mudstone than suggested by the original. East Greenl. Tect. Strat. Seq.: East Greenland Tectono-stratigraphic sequence. U: Upper. M: Middle. L: Lower. Abbreviations for geology are as follows: STR: Stratumbjerg Formation. R: Rødryggen Member. F: Falske Bugt Member. Pa: Palnatokes Bjerg Formation (Young Sund Member). Al: Albrechts Bugt Member. N: Niesen Member. Li: Lindemans Bugt Formation. Li (S): Lindemans Bugt Formation (Storsletten Member). Ri: Rigi Member. L: Laugeites Ravine Member. B: Bernbjerg Formation. Ug: Ugpik Ravine Member. J: Jakobsstigen Formation. Pay: Payer Dal Formation. Pe: Pelion Formation. Mu: Muslingebjerg Formation. Ba: Bastians Dal Formation. Black dashes indicate uncertain contact. Black vertical lines indicate boreholes, R-1: Rødryggen-1; BH-1: Brorson Halvø-1. ChronostratigraphyWollaston Forland – Kuhn Ø East Greenl. Tect. Strat. seq. R FAlPa Li Ri N B J Pe Ug Pay Mu Ba Onlaps crystalline basementOnlaps Upper Permian W E S N S N 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 Hauterivian Valanginian Ryazan- ian Volg- ian Berri- asian Tithon- ian Kimmeridgian Oxfordian Callovian Alluvial/delta plain – paralic, sand-dominated Coal Shallow marine sandstones Shelf transition – sandstones, mudstones, heteroliths O�shore/basinal mudstones Deep marine sandstones Deep marine conglomerates Calcareous sandy marine mudstones Red marine mudstones Hiatus/condensed Bathonian Bajocian Aalenian C re ta ce ou s Ju ra ss ic Lo w er U pp er M id dl e U M L U L U M L U M L U M L U L U M L L ChronostratigraphyWollaston Forland – Kuhn Ø R ? Al STR BH-1 R-1Pa No data Li Li (S)Ri N B J Pe Ug Pay Mu Ba Onlaps crystalline basementOnlaps Upper Permian W E Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian Ryazan- ian Volg- ian Berri- asian Tithon- ian Kimmeridgian Oxfordian Callovian Bathonian Bajocian Aalenian C re ta ce ou s Ju ra ss ic Lo w er U pp er M id dl e U M U L L U M L U M L U M L U L U M L L ? https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 5 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG the borehole is stratigraphically complete and does not include any notable hiatuses. A total of 258 samples were subjected to total carbon (TC), total sulphur (TS), total organic carbon (TOC) and Rock-Eval type screening analyses, and subsets of these samples were selected for further analyses such as vitrinite reflectance analysis (12 samples), biological marker analysis (24 samples) and stable carbon isotopic analysis (20 samples). The Brorson Halvø-1 borehole reached a TD of 225.88 m below terrain, with a core recovery of 99%. The  litho- stratigraphic units encountered include the Bernbjerg Formation (Kimmeridgian – lower Volgian), the Lindemans Bugt Formation (middle Volgian), the Palnatokes Bjerg Formation including the Albrechts Bugt Member (upper Ryazanian – upper Valanginian), and Rødryggen Member (Hauterivian) and the Stratumbjerg Formation (Barremian; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). The succession penetrated by the borehole is stratigraphically incomplete and includes notable hiatuses with significant portions of the upper part of the lower Volgian and the lower part of the mid- dle Volgian being absent. A significant portion of the upper part of the middle Volgian, the entire upper Volgian and lower Ryazanian successions are also missing (Fig. 3). A total of 232 samples were subjected to TC/TS/TOC-Rock- Eval type screening analyses, and subsets of these samples were selected for further analyses, such as vitrinite reflec- tance analysis (10 samples), biological marker analysis (18 samples) and stable carbon isotopic analysis (10 samples). In addition to the borehole samples, a set of out- crop samples collected in the immediate vicinity of the Rødryggen-1 drill site were subjected to TC/TS/ TOC-Rock-Eval type screening analyses. The sample set represents dense sampling of a c. 30 m thick profile of the uppermost part of the Storsletten Member (Lin- demans Bugt Formation), extending stratigraphically downwards from the well-defined boundary between the Storsletten Member of the Lindemans Bugt For- mation and the overlying Albrechts Bugt Member. The boundary thus serves as a datum for the sampling, which can also be recognised in the Rødryggen-1 core. The outcrop samples were collected from regular out- crops exposed by digging away the cover of loose shale debris. Analytical procedures, summarised here, are detailed in full in Bojesen-Koefoed et al. (2018). TC (wt%), TOC (wt%) and TS (wt%) were determined by combustion in a LECO CS-200 induction furnace. Petroleum potential was determined by Rock-Eval type pyrolysis using a Source Rock Analyzer (SRA) instrument, manufactured by Humble Instruments and Services and calibrated against the IFP160000 standard. Particulate blocks for reflected light microscopy were prepared and measured for vitrinite reflectance accord- ing to international standards (Taylor et al. 1998). Several samples were also qualitatively inspected in reflected white light and fluorescence-inducing blue light. Solvent extraction (samples powdered to <250 µm) was  carried out with methanol/dichloromethane 7:93 vol./vol. as solvent using a Soxtec™. Asphaltenes were precipitated by addition of 40-fold excess n-pentane. Mal- tene fractions were separated into saturated, aromatic and NSO fractions (NSO: compounds containing nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen and other heteroatoms) by medi- um-pressure liquid chromatography (Radke et al. 1980). Gas chromatography of saturated extract fractions was carried out using a Shimadzu GC-2010 instrument. Gas chromatography (GC) – mass spectrometry (MS) was car- ried out using an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph con- nected to a Waters (Micromass) Quattro Micro GC tandem quadrupole-hexapole-quadrupole mass spectrometer. 4. Results 4.1 Thermal maturity The thermal maturity of the successions penetrated by the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes was assessed using a combination of several inde- pendent parameters including the temperature at the maximum rate of pyrolysate generation (°C) Tmax and Production Index (PI) derived from Rock-Eval type pyrolysis, vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), and sterane isomerization ratios (Tables 1, 2, 4, 5). Fig.  4, upper panel, shows maturity data for both boreholes drilled versus depth. Fig.  4, lower panel, likewise shows maturity data versus depth but includes data on the stratigraphic breakdown and the presence of hiatuses in the Brorson Halvø-1 succession documented by Alsen et  al. (2023, this volume). Hence, the Brorson Halvø-1 data are shifted to accommodate two major hiatuses, assuming the thickness of missing sections equals the thickness of corresponding sections in the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Despite this very simplis- tic approach, a surprisingly good match is obtained when considering detailed variations, see Fig. 5, which has been prepared in a similar way. In both boreholes, homohopane isomerization ratios have reached equi- librium distribution, and thus carry no information on the maturity gradient, but demonstrate that the burial temperature has exceeded that required for the equi- librium reaction to have been completed. The Rødryggen-1 borehole shows clearly increasing trends with depth in all parameters (Fig. 4). Tmax increases from c. 420°C in the Ryazanian succession to 430°C in the Kimmeridgian succession at the base of the borehole. PI shows a parallel increase from c. 0.04 to 0.08, whereas the vitrinite reflectance increases from c. 0.48% Ro to 0.61% Ro, and sterane 20S/(20S+20R) isomerization ratio https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 6 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG goes from 0.30 to 0.49. Only the sterane αββ/(ααα+αββ) isomerization ratio shows a slightly more irregular depth trend, but on average, this ratio increases from c. 0.29 to 0.36 over the succession penetrated by the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Combined, the maturity parameters agree in suggesting that the succession is thermally immature Fig. 4 Thermal maturity parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b. rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes tak- ing into account stratigraphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compensated for by assuming that the thickness of the missing section equals the equivalent section in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, which shows no hiatus. Hence, only samples of the Rødryggen-1 borehole show true drilled depths, while samples below the hiatus in the Brorson Halvø-1 section have been shifted to greater depths and may even appear deeper than the total depth (TD) of the Brorson Halvø-1 bore- hole. Tmax: temperature of maximum rate of generation of pyrolysate during Rock-Eval type pyrolysis. Production Index: S1/(S1+S2) from Rock-Eval type pyrolysis. Ro (%): vitrinite reflectance. S29 20S/(20S+20R): C29 sterane 20αααS/(20αααS+20αααR) isomer ratio. S29 αββ/(αββ+ααα): C29 sterane 20αββ/(20ααα+20αββ) isomer ratio. Total Dia/Regular: total diasteranes to total regular steranes ratio. 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Production Index 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 S29 20S/(20S+20R) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 S29 αββ/(αββ+ααα) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Dia/Regular 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 400 420 440 460 480 Tmax (°C) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ro (%) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Production Index 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 S29 20S/(20S+20R) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Dia/Regular 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 400 420 440 460 480 Tmax (°C) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ro (%) S29 αββ/(αββ+ααα) https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 7 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG with respect to petroleum generation but is approach- ing oil-window maturity at the base of the borehole. The existence of a clear maturity gradient over such a limited depth interval is unexpected, but a similar fea- ture is found in the Blokelv-1 borehole in Jameson Land (Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2018), and in the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole, situated approximately 10  km north-east of the  Rødryggen-1 drill site. Over the succession pene- trated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole, Tmax increases from c. 435°C to 450°C with parallel increases in PI from c. 0.09 to 0.19, and in vitrinite reflectance from 0.54% Ro to 0.85% Ro. Sterane 20S/(20S+20R) isomerization ratios have reached equilibrium distribution in the entire suc- cession, whereas the sterane αββ/(ααα+αββ) isomer ratio increases from c. 0.55 to 0.62 with depth. Combined, the maturity parameters suggest that the upper part of the succession just enters the oil-generative window, which extends further towards the base of the borehole. Comparing the two panels of Fig. 4, the hiatus has little detectable effect on the maturity profile of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Despite the similar depth trends, which suggest a regionally high geothermal gradient, there is a notable difference in the level of thermal maturity observed in the two boreholes. 4.2 Petroleum potential and organic facies variations The succession penetrated by the Rødryggen-1 bore- hole is stratigraphically complete with no notable hiatus. The Kimmeridgian and lower Volgian sections show a steady up-section decrease in TOC, from close to 6 wt% to c. 3 wt% at the transition to the middle Volgian (Fig. 5; Table 1). TS remains largely constant at c. 2.5 wt% over the same interval, whereas the S2-parameter displays some variation, which is shown by the derived Hydrogen Index (HI) that shows initial values close to 200 and a gradual upwards increase culminating locally with a HI of c. 300, some 35 m below the transition to the lower Volgian. The section above shows a decreasing trend with a minimum HI of c. 200 in the lowermost part of the lower Volgian section, followed by a notable increase towards the base of the middle Volgian to HI close to 350. Average HI remains largely constant at 300–350 in the middle Volgian and the lower portion of the Ryaza- nian sections, after which it essentially drops to zero. However, in general terms, the drilled succession shows only limited variation in kerogen type as defined by screening data, i.e. a gas–oil-prone kerogen type II/III (Fig. 6). Superimposed on the general trends described here are a number of subordinate trends. Both general and subordinate trends can often be tied to transgres- sive-regressive cycles indicated by detailed sedimento- logical analysis and various chemical proxies, and which in turn are linked to the tectonic evolution of the area as described by Hovikoski et al. (2023a,b). The stratigraphically partly overlapping succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole shows very similar detailed variations to the corresponding succes- sion in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, except for the effects of increased thermal maturity, as shown by higher S1-values and lower S2-values and HI in the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole (Figs 5, 7; Table 2). Moreover, due to the presence of hiatuses, certain intervals are not present. The uninterrupted sedimentary record demon- strated by the succession drilled by the Rødryggen-1 borehole and its low level of thermal maturity allow a more detailed assessment of the petroleum potential of the individual chronostratigraphic intervals. Using the method of Dahl et al. (2004), the average propor- tions of inert/dead carbon and the average HI of the live kerogen fraction (HIlive) have been assessed (Fig. 8; Table 3). The results show that the Kimmeridgian, lower Volgian, middle Volgian and upper Volgian suc- cessions all include similar proportions of dead car- bon, yielding values roughly in the range 1.5–2.0 wt%. Conversely, HIlive tends to increase steadily up-section to culminate at a value of 610 in the upper Volgian section. The Ryazanian succession shows very low proportions of inert/dead carbon and slightly lower HIlive than the upper Volgian section, but the data set is limited and includes non-source deposits. Several biological marker parameters and stable carbon isotope ratio data (δ13C) show trends that fol- low those outlined for the screening data. Represen- tative chromatograms and ion fragmentograms for both boreholes are shown in Figs 9 and 10. Key biolog- ical markers and δ13C data are listed in Tables 4 and 5, and selected biological marker parameters and δ13C data are shown versus depth for both boreholes in Fig. 11. With some scatter, the pristane/phytane ratio shows a slight, but clear upwards-decreasing trend over the entire drilled succession, with no clear dif- ferences between the two boreholes. The isohopane ratio (Nytoft 2011) shows a much better defined, but very similar trend, i.e. a clear decrease from the base of the succession until the base of the middle Volgian succession from where the ratio seems to become stable. The homohopane ratio (Peters et al. 2005 and references therein) shows a clear increase upwards through the succession until the middle Volgian where the ratio becomes invariant. The boreholes show iden- tical trends, but the Brorson Halvø-1 data are shifted in the order of 5 percentage points towards higher values. The Gammacerane Index in the Rødryggen-1 borehole shows upwards-increase into the lower Vol- gian, followed by a decrease continuing into the mid- dle Volgian and a sharp increase and stabilisation in https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 8 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG the middle Volgian through the Ryazanian section. In the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole, no clear trends are observed. The proportion of C30 desmethyl steranes shows a steadily upwards-increasing trend through- out the entire penetrated successions with no obvious differences observed between the two boreholes. The δ13C data shows a slight upwards-decrease in the Kim- meridgian section, which becomes more pronounced upwards through the lower Volgian section followed by stabilisation or even a slight increase in the middle Fig. 5 Organic geochemical screening parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b. rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes taking into account stratigraphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compensated for by assuming that the thickness of the missing section equals the equivalent section in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, which shows no hiatus. Hence, only samples of the Rødryggen-1 borehole show true drilled depths, while samples below the hiatuses in the Brorson Halvø-1 section have been shifted to greater depths and may even appear deeper than the total depth (TD) of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Stratigraphic ages as defined by the Rødryggen-1 borehole. 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 TOC (wt%) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 S1 (Kg HC / Ton rock) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 S2 (Kg HC / Ton rock) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 Hydrogen Index 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 0 4 8 12 TC (wt%) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 TS (wt%) Kim merid gian l. V olgian m. V olgian u. Volgian Ryaza nian 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 TOC (wt%) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 S1 (Kg HC / Ton rock) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 S2 (Kg HC / Ton rock) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 Hydrogen Index 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 0 4 8 12 TC (wt%) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 TS (wt%) https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 9 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Table 1 Summary of organic geochemical data per stratigraphic interval of the Rødryggen-1 borehole Ryazanian upper Volgian middle Volgian lower Volgian Kimmeridgian (n = 23) (n = 9) (n = 55) (n = 55) (n = 97) TC Minimum 0.81 3.55 2.49 2.80 4.28 Maximum 5.03 5.36 5.60 10.19 10.66 Mean 3.14 4.39 4.07 4.55 6.00 TS Minimum 0.02 2.52 1.58 0.73 0.70 Maximum 6.49 8.80 12.05 4.21 5.91 Mean 3.10 5.04 3.75 2.21 2.72 TOC Minimum 0.10 3.07 2.11 1.48 1.30 Maximum 4.77 4.68 5.37 5.61 7.22 Mean 2.37 3.98 3.72 3.91 5.36 Tmax Minimum 419 419 420 421 424 Maximum 428 425 430 428 432 Mean 421 422 424 425 428 S1 Minimum 0.01 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.26 Maximum 0.80 0.60 1.05 1.20 1.58 Mean 0.46 0.47 0.64 0.60 1.01 S2 Minimum 0.33 8.93 5.39 2.36 2.77 Maximum 19.46 15.41 19.83 14.98 17.99 Mean 13.58 12.89 12.61 9.13 12.76 HI Minimum 39 271 214 136 137 Maximum 445 363 431 342 308 Mean 355 324 335 231 238 PI Minimum 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 Maximum 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.13 Mean 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 TC: Total Carbon (wt%). TS: Total Sulphur (wt%). TOC: Total Carbon (wt%). Tmax: Tmax (°C) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis, S1: Free hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. S2: Pyrolytic hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. HI: Hydrogen Index (100 × S2/TOC). PI: Production Index (S1/(S1+S2)). Table 2 Summary of organic geochemical data per stratigraphic interval of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole Ryazanian middle Volgian lower Volgian Kimmeridgian (n = 3) (n = 8) (n = 125) (n = 62) TC Minimum 0.71 2.62 2.86 4.58 Maximum 1.28 3.93 3.91 10.95 Mean 0.99 3.54 3.48 6.35 TS Minimum 3.76 2.44 2.44 1.03 Maximum 5.79 9.63 9.63 6.72 Mean 4.57 5.46 4.74 3.07 TOC Minimum 0.04 2.23 1.76 1.64 Maximum 0.10 3.79 6.58 8.07 Mean 0.06 3.08 4.05 5.74 Tmax Minimum 406 433 436 443 Maximum 435 438 438 452 Mean 423 436 437 447 S1 Minimum 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.48 Maximum 0.00 1.67 1.67 2.91 Mean 0.00 1.19 1.25 2.23 S2 Minimum 0.00 6.52 6.52 1.87 Maximum 0.00 10.94 10.94 15.77 Mean 0.00 9.07 8.61 10.64 HI Minimum 0 250 250 114 Maximum 0 324 325 220 Mean 0 294 303 184 PI Minimum n.a. 0.07 0.10 0.13 Maximum n.a. 0.20 0.20 0.36 Mean n.a. 0.12 0.13 0.18 TC: Total Carbon (wt%). TS: Total Sulphur (wt%). TOC: Total Carbon (wt%). Tmax: Tmax (°C) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. S1: Free hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. S2: Pyrolytic hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. HI: Hydrogen Index (100 × S2/TOC). PI: Production Index (S1/(S1+S2)). https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 10 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 6 Standard plots of organic geochemical screening data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole. 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 Tmax (°C) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Pr od uc ti on In de x (S 1/ (S 1+ S2 )) Rødryggen-1 borehole Ryazanian upper Volgian middle Volgian lower Volgian Kimmeridgian Immature Oil Condensate, wet gas Dry gas Staining or contamination Low maturity conversion 400 450 500 550 Tmax (°C) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 H yd ro ge n In de x 0,1 1 10 100 TOC (%) 0,1 1 10 100 S2 (m g H C /g ro ck ) Excellent Excellent Good G ood Fair Poor Poor https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 11 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 7 Standard plots of organic geochemical screening data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 Tmax (°C) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Pr od uc ti on In de x (S 1/ (S 1+ S2 )) Brorson Halvø-1 borehole middle Volgian lower Volgian Kimmeridgian Immature Oil Condensate, wet gas Dry gas Staining or contamination Low maturity conversion 400 450 500 550 Tmax (°C) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 H yd ro ge n In de x 0.1 1 10 100 TOC (%) 0.1 1 10 100 S2 (m g H C /g ro ck ) Excellent Excellent Good G ood Fair Poor Poor https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 12 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Volgian through Ryazanian section. Overall, the δ13C trend is mirrored in the homohopane ratio, the isoho- pane ratio and the proportion of C30 desmethyl ster- anes. Moreover, δ13C and the pristane/phytane ratio is reasonably well correlated, with increasing isotopic depletion and decreasing average pristane/phytane ratio up-section (Fig. 12). Superimposed on the general trends described here, minor trends can be observed in several data sets, which combined with detailed sedimentology and main and trace element data are reported by Hovikoski et al. (2023a). 4.3 Outcrop versus borehole samples: weathering effects The proximity of the sampled outcrop profile to the Rødryggen-1 drill site allows a close comparison of borehole versus outcrop data and thus assessment of weathering effects. Key data for outcrop and correla- tive borehole samples are shown in Fig. 13. The con- tents of TOC, and hence roughly the concentration of organic matter, do not show conspicuous differences between outcrop and borehole samples, but the qual- ity of the organic matter, using HI as a proxy, is remark- ably different. With only one exception, represented by a low-value spike on the drill-core sample data curve, the HI values are consistently and significantly lower in outcrop samples compared to drill-core samples. On average, borehole data show HI values (average HI 343) that are a factor of three to four greater than the values yielded in corresponding outcrop samples (average HI 102). TS concentrations in outcrop samples (average TS = 2.4%), which due to the clayey nature of the sediments can be safely assumed to primarily rep- resent pyritic sulphur, are approximately half of the values observed in fresh drill-core samples (average TS = 4.3%). 5. Discussion 5.1 Thermal maturity The presence of clear and consistent gradients in several independent thermal maturity indicators over such lim- ited depth intervals as represented by the drilled succes- sions of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes is remarkable, but a similar trend was observed in the Blokelv-1 borehole in Jameson Land (Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2018). The trend can be explained by considering the processes of thermal maturation and the amount of uplift and erosion that has taken place in the Wollaston Forland region. Based on apatite fission track data, Bonow & Japsen (2021) estimate that 2–3 km of sediments and volcanic deposits have been removed by erosion, which with a slightly higher than normal geothermal gradient suggests that the succession was near to or within the ‘oil window’ during the time of maximum burial. Assuming a higher-than-normal geothermal gradient seems rea- sonable considering rifting and magmatic activity in the area. The processes associated with thermal maturation and the conversion of kerogen into petroleum are not linear but include several ‘thresholds’, known as ‘coalifi- cation jumps’ in coal-petrographic nomenclature (Taylor et al. 1998). Such coalification jumps are defined by rapid changes in the rates of the maturation processes. Incip- ient petroleum generation or the start of the oil window coincides with the first coalification jump at which point several processes related to petroleum generation accel- erate. This causes the non-linearity of maturation profiles commonly seen in exploration wells entering or pene- trating the oil-generative window. The thermal maturity of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 successions includes the transition into or remains within, respec- tively, the oil-generative window. Due to rapid uplift and erosion, which removed the overlying succession, petroleum generation ceased while leaving the unusual maturity gradient. The pronounced difference in thermal maturity between the two boreholes cannot readily be explained, but it may be speculated if the Brorson Halvø area was more affected by magmatic intrusions than the central parts of the basin where the Rødryggen-1 borehole is situated. Basaltic lavas and magmatic intru- sions of various sizes crop out in the Brorson Halvø area whereas none are known in the immediate vicinity of the Rødryggen-1 borehole. The effects of magmatic intru- sions and hydrothermal waters on encasing sedimentary rocks are well known (e.g. Searl 1994; Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2018, 2020). 5.2 Petroleum potential and organic facies variations The variations in organic facies reflect large-scale variations in depositional environment linked to rel- ative sea-level changes, which in turn can be related to phases of the rifting in the region and tectonostrati- graphic development. The overall trends are cursorily discussed further here, whereas a detailed account can be found in Hovikoski et  al. (2023a,b), who also describe notable differences in the detailed sedimen- tology of the successions drilled by the two boreholes. However, since these have little impact on the general organic geochemical character of the deposits, they are not considered here. The Kimmeridgian succession in general represents an oxygen-restricted depositional environment, receiv- ing considerable amounts of allochthonous/terrigenous organic matter. Towards the end of the Kimmeridgian, https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 13 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 8 Assessment of HIlive (i.e. HI of the actively petroleum-generating part of the kerogen) and dead carbon (i.e. the carbon fraction that is inert with respect to petroleum generation) per stratigraphic unit of the Rødryggen-1 borehole, following the procedure of Dahl et al. (2004). Data are listed in Table 3. S2: Pyrolytic hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. TOC: Total organic carbon. 0 4 8 12 16 20 S2 (mg HC/g rock) 0 2 4 6 8 TO C (% ) Ryazanian: TOC = (0.216*S2) + 0.60 0 4 8 12 16 S2 (mg HC/g rock) 0 2 4 6 8 TO C (% ) upper Volgian: TOC = (0.164*S2) + 1.87 0 4 8 12 16 20 S2 (mg HC/g rock) 0 2 4 6 8 TO C (% ) middle Volgian: TOC = (0.179*S2) + 1.45 0 4 8 12 16 20 S2 (mg HC/g rock) 0 2 4 6 8 TO C (% ) Kimmeridgian: TOC = (0.301*S2) + 1.42 0 4 8 12 16 S2 (mg HC/g rock) 0 2 4 6 8 TO C (% ) lower Volgian: TOC = (0.261*S2) + 1.52 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 14 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Table 3 Average contents of inert carbon and hydrogen index values of the reactive kerogen fraction per stratigraphic interval of the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Calculated using the method of Dahl et al. (2004) Interval Inert C (%) Live kerogen HI Ryazanian 0.60 463 Late Volgian 1.87 610 Middle Volgian 1.45 559 Lower Volgian 1.52 383 Kimmeridgian 1.42 332 a gradual change occurs, pointing to increasing stagna- tion and reduced input of allochthonous/terrigenous organic matter and increasing proportions of autoch- thonous/marine organic matter in the sediments, corre- sponding to an overall transgression, probably eustatic in nature compounded by the effects of initial rifting (Hovikoski et  al. 2023a). This is clearly demonstrated in the sediments by the decreasing levels of TOC, coin- ciding with steadily increasing values of HI. The trans- gressive trend is also manifest in decreasing pristane/ phytane and isohopane ratios, increasing proportions of marine C30 desmethyl steranes and slightly decreasing δ13C (Figs 5, 11). After a period of stabilisation in the latest part of the Kimmeridgian, the lower Volgian succession records renewed transgression and further water column stag- nation, extending well into the lower part of the mid- dle Volgian. This is shown in the deposits by stable or slightly decreasing TOC paralleled by increasing HI, further decreases in pristane/phytane and isohopane ratios, increasing homohopane ratio and proportion of marine C30 desmethyl steranes plus further carbon iso- topic depletion leading to decreasing δ13C (Figs 5, 11). Overall, the succession from the lower part of the mid- dle Volgian through the Ryazanian seems to represent a fairly stable highstand with sediments dominated by autochthonous organic matter with a background con- tribution of allochthonous terrigenous organics. Minor variations may perhaps be attributed to local develop- ment of the rift. Hence, most parameters remain stable or show only weak trends. The general trends in relative sea level largely, albeit not fully, conform to the findings of Sneider et al. (1995) and Surlyk (2003), albeit with a shift in timing suggesting somewhat younger ages of the events recorded. The Kimmeridgian through Ryazanian succession, however, overall records a development including a gradual decrease in terrigenous input, increasing stag- nation and marine organic input. This is illustrated in Fig. 12, where δ13C and the pristane/phytane ratio both decrease upwards through the section. This is also depicted as a gradual transition from ‘deltaic’ sedimen- tation in the Kimmeridgian towards increasingly marine sedimentation in the Volgian–Ryazanian. This develop- ment determines the petroleum-generation potential of the resulting deposits. The entire succession shows high potential for petroleum generation, developing from predominantly gas–oil-prone kerogen in the Kim- meridgian towards an increasingly oil-prone kerogen up-section (see also Section 5.4 KinexTM modelling). This is also evident from the calculation of the average characteristics for partial sections defined by chronos- tratigraphic breakdown (Fig. 8; Table 3). The average HI shows a steady increase from the Kimmeridgian through the upper Volgian succession, and at the same time the proportion of inert carbon remains rather stable. The data on the Ryazanian are not fully representative for the petroleum potential since the data set also includes samples from the non-source section deposited after ventilation of the basin in the later part of the Ryazanian. 5.3 Outcrop versus borehole samples: weathering effects Compared to correlative stratigraphic intervals in the greater North Atlantic area, outcrop samples of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous succession in East and North-East Greenland often show surprisingly low petroleum potential (Requejo et  al. 1989; Christiansen et  al. 1992; Strogen et  al. 2005; Bojesen-Koefoed et  al. 2018). The exact reason for this is not fully understood but based on the data reported in this paper as well as the observations of Bojesen-Koefoed et  al. (2018) an important cause may be the very large concentrations of finely disseminated pyrite present in the shales. Weathering of pyrite will ultimately generate sulphu- rous and sulphuric acids, which, by their oxidising nature, may attack kerogen and reduce its petroleum potential. In addition, decomposition through microbial sulphate reduction is conceivable since several strains of sulphate-reducing bacteria seem to be facultative anaerobes, and are thus able to survive or perhaps even proliferate in oxic environments (Sass & Cypionka 2007). In the present case, the true HI may be reduced by a factor of 3 or more due to weathering (Fig. 13). Hence, although the underlying reason is not fully clear, it can be concluded that in the present case, outcrop samples are unsuitable for assessing the true potential for petro- leum generation of the deposits. A common sign of weathering of pyrite is encrustations of greenish-yellow jarosite on outcrop faces, and this occurs frequently in the succession studied here. Jarosite is a potassium-iron sulphate-mineral (KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6), characteristically formed by pyrite weathering. Several published studies report similar effects but with TOC levels often much more reduced than those observed here (Leythaeuser 1973; Clayton & Swetland 1978; Raiswell & Berner 1986; https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 15 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 9 Biological marker data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Characteristic fingerprints of samples representing the upper (sample #17895, 37.88 m, upper Volgian) and lower (sample #18086, 216.55 m, Kimmeridgian) parts of the drilled succession. GC-MS-MS parent–daughter traces for steranes and hopanes represent the sum of five and nine parent–daughter transitions, respectively. Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Pris ta ne Pris ta ne Ph yt an ePh yt an e nC₁₅ nC 15 nC 20 nC₂₀ nC₂₅ nC 25 nC 30 nC₃₀ nC₃₅ nC 35 nC 40 T₂ ₅ T₂₆T₂ ₃ T₂₄ Te ₂₄ T₂ ₅ T₂₆T₂ ₃ T₂₄ Te ₂₄ GC-MS(SIM) m/z 191 GC-MS(SIM) m/z 191 GC-FID GC-FID GC-MS-MS parent–daughter hopanes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter hopanes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter steranes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter steranes Ts Tm H28 H29 H30 H31 (S +R) H32 (S +R) H33 (S +R) H34 (S +R) H35 (S +R) D 30 M 29 M 30 Ts Tm H28 H29 H30 H31 (S +R) H32 (S +R) H33 (S +R) H34 (S +R) H35 (S +R) D 30 M 29 M 30 S29 S30 S29 αα αS αα αR αβ βS αβ β R S30 αα αR αα βD27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 Sample #17895, 37.88 m Sample #18086, 216.55 m αα αS αα αR αβ βS αβ β R αα αR αα β αβ βS https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 16 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 10 Biological marker data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Characteristic fingerprints of samples representing the upper (sample #18623, 64.23 m, lower Volgian) and lower (sample #18889, 224.69 m, Kimmeridgian) parts of the drilled succession. GC-MS-MS parent–daughter traces for steranes and hopanes represent the sum of five and nine parent–daughter transitions, respectively. Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Time Si gn al Pris ta ne Pris ta ne Ph yt an e Ph yt an e nC₁₅ nC₁₅ nC₂₀ nC₂₀ nC₂₅ nC₂₅ nC₃₀ nC₃₀ nC₃₅ nC₃₅ nC₄₀ T₂ ₅ T₂₆T₂ ₃ T₂₄ Te ₂₄ T₂ ₅ T₂₆T₂ ₃ T₂₄ Te ₂₄ GC-MS(SIM) m/z 191 GC-MS(SIM) m/z 191 GC-FID GC-FID GC-MS-MS parent–daughter hopanes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter hopanes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter steranes GC-MS-MS parent–daughter steranes Ts Tm H28 H29 H30 H31 (S +R) H32 (S +R) H33 (S +R) H34 (S +R) H35 (S +R) D 30 M 29 M 30 Ts Tm H28 H29 H30 H31 (S +R) H32 (S +R) H33 (S +R) H34 (S +R) H35 (S +R) D 30 M 29 M 30 S29 S30 S29 S30 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 Sample #18623, 64.23 m Sample #18889, 224.69 m nC₄₀ αα αS αα αRαβ βSαβ β R αα αR αα β αα αS αα αR αβ βSαβ β R αα αR αα β αβ βS https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 17 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Littke et al. 1991; Petsch et al. 2000; Tang et al. 2018; Pan et al. 2022). Unravelling the causes for this difference is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper. 5.4 KinexTM modelling Variations in petroleum generation potential in the shale section of the Rødryggen-1 borehole were Table 4 Key biological marker data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole Sample # Stratigraphy Depth (m) Pr/Ph BHN index D30 index IHR HHI S27 (%) S28 (%) S29 (%) S30 (%) S29 (S/(S+R)) S29 ββ/ (ββ+αα) Dia/Reg steranes δ13C (total) 17097 Ryazanian 25.00 2.52 2.89 7.81 0.12 4.89 32.1 28.3 29.0 10.6 0.30 0.29 2.41   17886 Ryazanian 28.89 2.15 7.57 9.35 0.11 6.39 35.9 29.2 24.2 10.6 0.30 0.33 2.16 –29.1 17895 upper Volgian 37.88 2.55 2.13 9.22 0.11 4.69 37.1 27.9 27.1 7.9 0.29 0.33 1.96 –29.0 17905 middle Volgian 47.06 2.85 1.98 9.68 0.12 4.18 35.4 27.9 26.0 10.7 0.30 0.30 1.77 –29.2 17916 middle Volgian 56.88 2.24 4.68 9.73 0.11 6.65 30.6 33.1 26.8 9.4 0.30 0.30 1.61 –29.2 17924 middle Volgian 64.47 3.34 7.79 6.01 0.11 4.24 35.1 29.7 26.8 8.3 0.30 0.30 1.72   17935 middle Volgian 74.92 3.84 29.10 7.89 0.10 5.12 35.2 31.1 25.7 8.0 0.33 0.32 1.78 –29.9 17944 middle Volgian 83.57 2.15 19.42 8.55 0.10 8.18 32.9 31.9 28.5 6.6 0.33 0.32 1.61 –29.7 17953 middle Volgian 92.23 2.04 3.12 8.26 0.10 7.16 31.9 31.6 28.6 7.8 0.33 0.29 1.28 –29.9 17962 lower Volgian 100.73 2.21 1.40 6.23 0.10 6.42 31.5 31.7 29.0 7.9 0.35 0.30 1.52 –29.4 17973 lower Volgian 110.15 2.38 43.26 8.57 0.11 5.54 30.7 31.3 31.5 6.5 0.37 0.33 2.37 –28.4 17983 lower Volgian 119.77 3.19 68.03 8.71 0.12 4.23 30.6 29.6 34.7 5.0 0.38 0.36 2.58 –28.1 17992 lower Volgian 128.22 3.82 65.55 8.70 0.12 4.20 28.2 28.7 37.1 6.0 0.41 0.23 0.77 –28.2 18002 lower Volgian 139.26 3.13 82.51 9.27 0.11 5.53 26.7 17.8 51.0 4.4 0.42 0.24 1.54 –27.3 18012 lower Volgian 148.46 3.13 72.91 9.62 0.11 4.51 25.8 21.1 48.7 4.4 0.44 0.23 0.77 –27.2 18023 Kimmeridgian 158.77 2.64 70.66 9.81 0.12 4.86 28.7 27.9 37.8 5.6 0.42 0.34 2.18 –27.8 18032 Kimmeridgian 167.24 2.70 57.72 7.62 0.11 4.31 29.7 25.3 40.1 4.9 0.44 0.32 2.08 –27.3 18042 Kimmeridgian 176.33 2.51 47.73 8.73 0.10 4.63 31.8 27.3 35.4 5.6 0.43 0.32 1.81   18054 Kimmeridgian 187.85 4.18 28.12 7.25 0.12 2.85 31.7 27.8 33.3 7.1 0.45 0.33 2.04 –27.3 18064 Kimmeridgian 197.24 2.71 46.42 8.33 0.12 3.50 30.4 29.3 34.2 6.1 0.45 0.34 1.83 –27.4 18075 Kimmeridgian 207.21 3.07 53.48 8.45 0.11 3.84 30.3 29.2 34.6 5.8 0.49 0.41 2.08 –26.7 18086 Kimmeridgian 216.55 3.94 76.54 7.73 0.13 3.41 28.1 27.0 40.8 4.1 0.48 0.38 2.66   18094 Kimmeridgian 224.44 2.94 28.86 7.97 0.12 4.20 31.0 28.3 35.2 5.5 0.49 0.35 2.06 –27.0 18109 Kimmeridgian 234.66 3.54 78.08 8.37 0.12 4.36 28.2 28.1 37.9 5.8 0.49 0.37 1.59 –26.6 Pr/Ph: pristane/phytane ratio. BNH Index: 100 × (28,30-bisnorhopane/(28,30-bisnorhopane+hopane)). D30 Index: 100×*(C30-diahopane/(C30-diaho- pane+hopane)). IHR: isohopane ratio (Nytoft 2011). HHI: Homohopane Index: 100 × (H35 hopanes)/(sum of H31–35 hopanes), S27 (%), S28 (%), S29 (%), S30 (%). normalised distribution of C27–C30 total steranes, S29 (S/(S+R)). C29 sterane 20S/(20S+20R) isomer ratio, S29 (ββ/ββ+αα). C29 sterane αββ/ (αββ+ααα) isomer ratio, Dia/Reg. total diasteranes/total regular steranes, δ13C (total). stable carbon isotopic composition, total extract. Table 5 Key biological marker data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole Sample # Stratigraphy Depth (m) Pr/Ph H28 index D30 index IHR HHI S27 (%) S28 (%) S29 (%) S30 (%) S29 (S/(S+R)) S29 ββ/ (ββ+αα) Dia/Reg steranes δ13C (total) 18599 middle Volgian 41.28 2.19 0.00 8.73 0.10 12.91 34.0 28.8 25.9 11.4 0.56 0.56 3.30 –30.0 18600 middle Volgian 42.09 2.31 0.28 7.63 0.10 12.41 33.2 27.3 26.6 12.9 0.54 0.55 3.41 18611 lower Volgian 52.41 2.12 0.51 7.83 0.11 12.12 27.6 29.3 34.6 8.6 0.53 0.55 3.39 20158 lower Volgian 52.95 2.10 0.86 7.18 0.11 12.09 28.2 29.0 34.9 7.8 0.55 0.56 3.23 18623 lower Volgian 64.23 3.46 22.75 7.87 0.12 9.39 27.7 25.8 39.2 7.3 0.52 0.54 3.81 –28.6 18635 lower Volgian 75.28 2.52 19.46 9.87 0.12 10.22 28.0 25.3 39.5 7.2 0.54 0.55 2.73 18648 lower Volgian 87.78 2.67 23.49 9.60 0.12 10.01 30.9 24.4 37.2 7.6 0.53 0.56 2.32 –28.8 18659 lower Volgian 98.08 2.52 23.91 8.75 0.11 10.26 25.7 23.9 43.6 6.8 0.54 0.60 1.54 –28.0 18672 lower Volgian 111.25 2.84 24.48 7.81 0.11 10.73 24.3 19.4 50.0 6.4 0.56 0.61 1.17 –27.8 18695 lower Volgian 132.43 2.35 26.22 7.76 0.12 10.12 23.8 18.7 52.2 5.2 0.54 0.60 1.45 –27.4 18711 lower Volgian 148.83 2.47 4.03 8.76 0.14 8.75 29.4 25.6 36.8 8.1 0.55 0.61 2.35 18718 lower Volgian 155.74 2.75 3.28 9.81 0.14 6.94 29.4 24.3 37.5 8.8 0.54 0.61 3.01 –27.7 19820 Kimmeridgian 172.02 2.93 12.36 8.89 0.13 8.19 29.4 24.3 40.5 5.8 0.56 0.63 2.85 18741 Kimmeridgian 178.19 2.99 16.32 10.04 0.15 8.49 27.0 20.1 48.2 4.8 0.53 0.62 2.19 –27.8 19821 Kimmeridgian 184.35 2.87 10.19 10.86 0.13 7.75 27.9 23.3 42.7 6.1 0.54 0.65 3.13 18865 Kimmeridgian 201.23 2.79 9.91 14.21 0.17 8.58 28.3 21.6 44.1 6.0 0.55 0.62 3.34 –26.7 18882 Kimmeridgian 217.89 2.38 4.15 20.58 0.19 10.40 30.8 23.1 39.6 6.4 0.52 0.62 1.54 18889 Kimmeridgian 224.69 3.07 3.65 21.11 0.18 7.79 26.8 23.7 43.9 5.5 0.52 0.61 4.24 –26.9 Pr/Ph. pristane/phytane ratio, BNH index. 100 × (28,30-bisnorhopane/(28,30-bisnorhopane+hopane)), D30 index. 100 × (C30-diahopane/(C30-diaho- pane+hopane)), IHR. isohopane ratio (Nytoft 2011), HHI. Homohopane Index: 100 × (H35 hopanes)/(sum of H31–35 hopanes), S27 (%), S28 (%), S29 (%), S30 (%). normalised distribution of C27–C30 total steranes, S29 (S/(S+R)). C29 sterane 20S/(20S+20R) isomer ratio, S29 (ββ/ββ+αα). C29 sterane αββ/ (αββ+ααα) isomer ratio, Dia/Reg. total diasteranes/total regular steranes, δ13C (total). stable carbon isotopic composition, total extract. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 18 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 11 Biological marker parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b.rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols) boreholes taking into account strati- graphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compen- sated for by assuming that the thickness of the missing section equals the equivalent section in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, which shows no hiatus. Hence, only samples of the Rødryggen-1 borehole show true drilled depths, while samples below the hiatuses in the Brorson Halvø-1 section have been shifted to greater depths and may even appear deeper than the total depth (TD) of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Stratigraphic ages as defined by the Rødryggen-1 borehole. quantified by estimating the generated fluid phases (oil and gas) using Kinex™ modelling (ZetaWare Inc.; herein referred to simply as Kinex modelling) to cal- culate the Ultimate Expulsion Potential (UEP; mmboe/ km2). The UEP shows the ultimate expellable volume of hydrocarbons in million barrels of oil equivalent (mmboe) per km2 if the entire shale section cored by Rødryggen-1 passed through the petroleum genera- tion window. Calculation of the UEP applies the kinet- ics of organofacies B (marine clay-rich shale, largely 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Isohopane Ratio 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Gammacerane Index 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 Total S30 (%) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 –31 –30 –29 –28 –27 –26 δ¹³C (total extract) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Pristane/Phytane 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 0 5 10 15 Homohopane ratio (%) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Isohopane Ratio 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Gammacerane Index 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 Total S30 (%) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 –31 –30 –29 –28 –27 –26 δ¹³C (total extract) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Pristane/Phytane 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M et re s b. r � . 0 5 10 15 Homohopane ratio (%) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Kim merid gian l. V olgian m. V olgian u. Volgian Ryaza nian https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 19 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 12 Stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) of total extracts versus pristane/phytane ratio. Note gradual isotopic depletion occurs parallel to decreasing average pristane/phytane ratio up-section. Plot modified from Chung et al. (1992). Fig. 13 Comparison of outcrop and borehole data at the Rødryggen-1 drill site. The outcrop profile was sampled using the sharp boundary to the Albrechts Bugt Member as datum. Orange curve: outcrop data. Black curve: Drill-core samples. –32 –31 –30 –29 –28 –27 –26 –25 –24 –23 –22 –21 δ¹³C (total extract) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pr is ta ne /P hy ta ne ra ti o Rødryggen-1, upper Volgian - lower Ryazanian Rødryggen-1, middle Volgian Rødryggen-1, lower Volgian Rødryggen-1, Kimmeridgian Brorson Halvø-1, middle Volgian Brorson Halvø-1, lower Volgian Brorson Halvø-1, Kimmeridgian Marine shale and Paleozoic carbonate Deltaic Mesozoic carbonate Up section 0 100 200 300 400 500 Hydrogen Index 60 50 40 30 20 0 4 8 12 16 TS (%) 60 50 40 30 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOC (%) 60 50 40 30 20 D ep th /P os it io n (m ) r el at iv e to c om m on d at um Drill-core samples Outcrop samples Contact to Albrechts Bugt Member https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 20 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 14 Ultimate Expulsion Potential (UEP) of the cored shale section on Rødryggen-1 borehole. The UEP profile through the shales shows vary- ing source-rock quality and generation potential in terms of generation products. The shales are relatively gas-prone, but the middle Volgian to Ryazanian shales are mostly oil-prone. L.: Lower. M.: Middle. U.: Upper. Fig. 15 Cumulative expelled C6+ hydrocarbons (oil, HC6+) and C1–5 hydrocarbons (gas, HC1–6) of the Rødryggen-borehole. Oil generation terminates at about 1.0–1.1% Ro. equal to Type II kerogen; Pepper & Corvi (1995a)) and the Pepper & Corvi (1995b) expulsion model where the retention of hydrocarbons is only adsorption-con- trolled (hydrocarbons will expel when the adsorption threshold is exceeded). The shale section was split into 258 subsections based on cuttings sampling density, resulting in an average subsection thickness of 0.91 m. Due to thermal immaturity of the shales (vitrinite reflectance <0.61%  Ro), the measured TOC and HI values for each cuttings/subsection were used. The total UEP of the c. 235 m thick shale section is c. 44 mmboe/km2, but the source-rock quality varies significantly through the shales (Fig. 14). The Kimme- ridgian and lower Volgian sections show the poorest source-rock quality and are relatively gas-prone. The source-rock quality improves significantly in the mid- dle Volgian to Ryazanian age mudstones that show increased capacity to generate liquid hydrocarbons (Fig. 14). However, overall the mudstone section in Rødryggen-1 is relatively gas-prone and does not pos- sess the outstanding source-rock quality commonly observed in the upper Volgian and Ryazanian shales of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation and equivalents, such as the Spekk, Draupne, Mandal and Farsund Formations in the North Sea and Atlantic Margin (e.g. Von der Dick et  al. 1989; Miller 1990; Chakhmakh- chev et  al. 1994; Klemme 1994; Telnæs et  al. 1994; Fowler & McAlpine 1995; Isaksen & Ledje 2001; Ineson et al. 2003; Justwan & Dahl 2005; Justwan et al. 2005, 2006a,b; Petersen et al. 2010). The UEP can be divided into an Ultimate Expulsion Oil (UEO) and an Ultimate Expulsion Gas (UEG), which are c. 15.6 mmboe/km2 and c. 28.6 mmboe/km2, respectively. This is in line with HI values in the most oil-prone middle Volgian, upper Volgian and Ryazanian shales only reaching maximum values of 431 mg HC/g TOC, 405 mg HC/g TOC and 445 mg HC/g TOC. These moderate max- imum HI values may reflect the narrow nature of the rift (approx. 30 km), which allows a background contribution of terrigenous organic matter with low potential for petroleum generation, irrespective of basin stagnation and oxygen deficiency. The relatively gas-prone character of the shales is also illustrated by the modelled cumulative expelled volumes where oil (HC6+) generation and expulsion end at about 1.0–1.1%  Ro while significant gas generation contin- ues at higher maturities (Fig. 15). 6. Conclusions The Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 fully cored boreholes were drilled in Wollaston Forland (North- East Greenland, approx. 74°N). They have tested the development in sedimentary environments and petroleum-source potential of Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous organic-rich mudstones at two different positions within an evolving halfgraben, situated at the margin of the main North Atlantic rift system, and thus partially detached from it. The overall halfgraben is, however, segmented in sev- eral subblocks, which evolved quasi-independently through the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous. The two boreholes were thus drilled at different locations within the Permpas–Hühnerbjerg block(s), bounded L.-U. Ryazanian U. Volgian M. Volgian L. Volgian Kimmeridgian Total UEP = 44.2615 mmboe/km² Thickness = 234.46 m 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 UEP (mmboe/km²) 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 Th ic kn es s (m ) Cumulative HC6+ Expelled (mass) Cumulative HC1–6 Expelled (mass) Vitrinite Re�ectance Easy-Ro (%) C um ul at iv e H C E xp el le d (m as s) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 21 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Fig. 16 Summary of the combined stratigraphic coverage of the Blokelv-1 (Jameson Land), Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes (Wol- laston Forland). For details on the Blokelv-1 borehole, see Ineson & Bojesen-Koefoed (2018). Combined information from the three bore- holes indicates that deposition of organic-rich mudstones with petro- leum-generation potential prevailed for a period of approximately 20 million years in North-East Greenland during the Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous. U.: Upper. M.: Middle. L.: Lower. by the Dombjerg Fault to the west and the Hühnerb- jerg Fault to the east, which probably were the main controlling faults in the studied block during the Late Jurassic. The Rødryggen-1 borehole was drilled to a depth of approx. 236 m, in the central part of the basin and includes an uninterrupted mudstone succession rang- ing in age from the upper Kimmeridgian to the upper Valanginian. The Brorson Halvø-1 borehole was drilled to a depth of approximately 226 m close to the uplifted eastern crest of the same block and includes a succes- sion ranging in age from the upper Kimmeridgian to the lower Barremian, however with two major hiatuses in the middle Volgian and upper Volgian – Ryazanian sections. Based on the combined indications of several inde- pendent parameters such as Tmax, vitrinite reflectance and sterane isomerization ratios, the Rødryggen-1 suc- cession is thermally immature but approaching oil-win- dow maturity, whereas the Brorson Halvø-1 succession is oil-window mature. The causes for the differences in thermal maturity are not clear but may be linked to the presence of abundant Palaeogene intrusions in the vicinity of the Brorson Halvø-1 drill site. Such intru- sions are not known near the Rødryggen-1 drill site. Both boreholes show consistent increases in thermal maturity with depth, which is surprising considering the limited depth of the boreholes. The trends may be explained by rapid uplift, which quenched non-linear maturity trends, characteristic of the oil window. A sim- ilar trend was reported for the Blokelv-1 borehole in Jameson Land. Bearing in mind the hiatus and the differences in thermal maturity between the two boreholes, the organic geochemical characteristics of the two succes- sions are remarkably similar, despite the differences in setting within the graben system. Others have demonstrated notable differences in the detailed sed- imentology of the two successions, but the impact of sedimentological processes on the organic matter content of the deposits seems to have been trivial in this case. This suggests that the organic matter con- tent of the deposits was governed by higher order processes such as primary productivity and the pres- ervation potential at the sediment-water interface, and that these factors remained rather constant irre- spective of the sedimentary processes operating near the seabed. The Kimmeridgian through Ryazanian succession in general records a transgressive development with gradual decrease in terrigenous organic matter input, increasing bottom-water stagnation oxygen deficiency and marine organic-matter input. Superimposed on the C RE TA C EO U S (p ar s) Lo w er (p ar s) U pp er JU R A SS IC Bl ok el v- 1 Rø dr yg ge n- 1 c. 2 0 M ill io n ye ar s Br or so n H al vø -1 O XF O RD IA N L. L. L. L. L. L. M . U . U . L. U . U . U . U . Sy st em Se ri es Th et ys (S ta nd ar d) B or ea l Su bs ta ge M . U . KI M M ER ID G IA N VA LA N G IN IA N BE RR IA SI A N TI TH O N IA N RY A Z A N IA N V O LG IA N BA RR EM IA N H A U TE RI V IA N 130 125 Age (Ma) 140 150 160 135 145 155 Stage https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 22 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG overall trend are several minor trends related to the detailed development of the rift, discussed in detail by Hovikoski et al. (2023a,b). The petroleum-generation potential of the imma- ture/early mature Kimmeridgian through Ryaza- nian succession of the Rødryggen-1 borehole may be described as oil-prone or gas–oil-prone, growing increasingly oil-prone upwards. However, Kinex model- ling demonstrates that the succession is relatively gas- prone throughout due to the relatively high input of terrigenous organic matter due to the rather proximal setting of the basin compared to the outboard basins of the main rift. A comparison of parallel sets of outcrop and drill- core samples from the Rødryggen outcrop and Rødryg- gen-1 borehole, respectively, shows that the HI of outcrop samples may be reduced to one third due to weathering. Although the underlying reason for this effect is not documented in full detail, it can be rea- sonably linked to weathering of abundant, finely dis- seminated pyrite present in the rocks, the products of which will attack the kerogen and deteriorate its petro- leum-generation potential. In summary, the combined evidence from the drill- ing of the Blokelv-1 borehole in Jameson Land and the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes in Wol- laston Forland (Fig. 16) indicates that continuous depo- sition of mudstones with high petroleum-generation potential prevailed in East and North-East Greenland over a timespan of approximately 20 million years in the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous. Acknowledgments The drilling teams, including John Boserup, Anders Clausen, Peter Turner, Lars (Lasse) Thomsson, Andreas Hjort Frandsen, Anders Pil- gaard and Annette Ryge, are thanked for their efforts and for keeping up the good spirits through the very challenging 2009 field season. The pilots Finn Rusanes and Göran Lindmark are thanked for dili- gent sling-work under very difficult conditions. Ditte Kiel-Dühring and Carsten Guvad are thanked for excellent laboratory work, and Hans Peter Nytoft is thanked for producing biological marker data. Jette Halskov and Annabeth Andersen assisted with the draft work. Helpful and constructive reviews by Drs Erdem Idiz and Iain C. Scotchman are gratefully acknowledged. Funding statement The present work was funded by GEUS and a consortium of different companies of the international petroleum industry, who are all part- ners in a long-lasting collaborative effort, run by GEUS, concerning the geology of North-East Greenland. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests Author contributions JABK: Writing – original draft, supervision, project administration, investigation, funding acquisition. PA: Investigation, funding acquisi- tion. MB: Investigation. JH: Investigation, writing – original draft. PJ: Investigation. HNH: Investigation. HIP: Investigation. SP: Investigation. HV: Investigation. References Alsen, P. & Mutterlose, J. 2009: The early Cretaceous of North-East Green- land: a crossroads of belemnite migration. Palaeogeography, Palae- oclimatology, Palaeoecology 280, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. palaeo.2009.06.011 Alsen, P., Piasecki, S., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Pauly, S., Sheldon, E. & Hovikoski, J. 2023: Stratigraphy of the Upper Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous in the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes, Wollaston Forland, North-East Greenland. GEUS Bulletin 55, 8342 (this volume). https:// doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8342 Bjerager, M., Alsen, P., Bojesen-Koefoed, J., Fyhn, M.B.W., Hovikoski, J., Ineson, J., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Nielsen, L.H., Piasecki, S. & Vosgerau, H. 2020: Cretaceous lithostratigraphy of North-East Greenland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 68, 37–93. Birkelund, T. & Perch-Nielsen, K. 1976: Late Palaeozoic – Mesozoic evo- lution of central East Greenland. In: Escher, A. & Watt, W.S. (eds): Geology of Greenland. Geological Survey of Greenland 304–339. Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A., et al. 2020: A mid-Cretaceous petroleum source- rock in the North Atlantic region? Implications of the Nanok-1 fully cored borehole, Hold with Hope, northeast Greenland. Marine and Petroleum Geology 117, 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpetgeo.2020.104414 Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A, Alsen, P., Bjerager, M., Hovikoski, J., Ineson, J.R., Johannessen, P., Olivarius, M., Piasecki, S. & Vosgerau, H. 2023: The Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 fully cored boreholes (Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous), Wollaston Forland, North-East Greenland – an introduction. GEUS Bulletin 55, 8350 (this volume). https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8350 Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A., Bjerager, M., Nytoft, H.P, Petersen, H.I., Pias- ecki, S. & Pilgaard, A. 2018: Petroleum potential of the Upper Juras- sic Hareelv Formation, Jameson Land, East Greenland. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 42, 85–113. https://doi. org/10.34194/geusb.v42.4314 Bonow, J.M. & Japsen, P. 2021: Peneplains and tectonics in North-East Greenland after opening of the North-East Atlantic. GEUS Bulletin 45(1), 5297. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v45.5297 Chakhmakhchev, A., Sampei, Y. & Suzuki, N. 1994: Geochemical char- acteristics of oils and source rocks in the Yamal peninsula, West Siberia, Russia. Organic Geochemistry 22, 311–322. https://doi. org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90177-5  Christiansen, F.G., Dam, G., Piasecki, S. & Stemmerik, L. 1992: A review of Upper Palaeozoic and Mesozoic source rocks from onshore East Greenland. In: Spencer, A.M. (ed.): Generation, accumulation and pro- duction of Europe’s hydrocarbons II. Special Publication of the Euro- pean Association of Petroleum Geologists 2, 151–161. Chung, H.M., Rooney, M.A., Toon, M.B. & Claypool, G.E. 1992: Carbon Isotope composition of marine crude oils (1). AAPG Bulletin 76, 1000– 1007. https://doi.org/10.1306/bdff8952-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d  Clayton, J.L. & Swetland, P.J. 1978: Subaerial weathering of sedimen- tary organic matter. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90183-7 Dahl, B., Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A., Holm, A., Justwan, H., Rasmussen, E. & Thomsen, E. 2004: 05/00955 A new approach to interpreting Rock-Eval S2 and TOC data for kerogen quality assessment. Organic Geochem- istry 35, 1461–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.07.003 Fowler, M.G. & McAlpine, K.D. 1995: The Egret member, a prolific Kimme- ridgian source rock from offshore eastern Canada. In: Katz, B.J. (ed.): Petroleum source rocks. Springer-Ver- lag 111–130. Fyhn, M.B.W. et  al. 2021a: Central East and NE Greenland composite tectono-sedimentary element, East Greenland Rifted Margin, Green- land Sea. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 57, M57. https://doi. org/10.1144/M57-2017-15 Fyhn, M.B.W., Hopper, J.R., Sandrin, A., Lauridsen, B.W., Heincke, B.H., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Andersen, M.S., Alsen, P. & Nielsen, T. 2021b: Three- phased latest Jurassic–Eocene rifting and mild mid-Cenozoic com- pression offshore NE Greenland. Tectonophysics 815, 228990. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228990 Henstra, G.A., et al. 2016: Depositional processes and stratigraphic architecture within a coarse-grained rift-margin turbidite system: The https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.06.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.06.011 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8342 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104414 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104414 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8350 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v42.4314 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v42.4314 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v45.5297 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90177-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90177-5 https://doi.org/10.1306/bdff8952-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90183-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.07.003 https://doi.org/10.1144/M57-2017-15 https://doi.org/10.1144/M57-2017-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228990 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228990 Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 23 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG Wollaston Forland Group, east Greenland. Marine and Petroleum Geology 76, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.05.018 Higgins, A.K. 2010: Exploration history and place names of northern East Greenland. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 21, 368 pp. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v21.4735 Hovikoski, J. et al. 2023a: Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous marine deox- ygenation in NE Greenland. Journal of the Geological Society 180 (3), jgs2022–058. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2022-058. Hovikoski, J., Ineson, J.R, Olivarius, M., Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A, Piasecki, S. & Alsen, P. 2023b: Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous of eastern Wollaston Forland, North-East Greenland: a distal marine record of an evolving rift. GEUS Bulletin 55, 8349 (this volume). https://doi. org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8349 Hovikoski, J., Uchman, A., Alsen, P. & Ineson, J. 2018: Ichnological and sedimentological characteristics of submarine Fan-Delta deposits in a Half-Graben, Lower Cretaceous Palnatokes Bjerg Formation, NE Greenland. Ichnos 26, 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2017. 1396981 Ineson, J.R. & Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A. (eds) 2018: Petroleum geology of the Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous of East and Northeast Greenland: Blokelv-1 borehole, Jameson Land Basin. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 42, 168 pp. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v42 Ineson, J.R., Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A., Dybkjær, K. & Nielsen, L.H. 2003: Vol- gian–Ryazanian ‘hot shales’ of the Bo Member (Farsund Formation) in the Danish Central Graben, North Sea: stratigraphy, facies and geo- chemistry. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 1, 403–436. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v1.4679 Isaksen, G.H & Ledje H.I. 2001: Source rock quality and hydrocarbon migration pathways within the greater Utsira High area, Viking Gra- ben, Norwegian North Sea. AAPG Bulletin 85(5), 861–883. https://doi. org/10.1306/8626ca23-173b-11d7-8645000102c1865d Justwan, H. & Dahl, B. 2005: Quantitative hydrocarbon potential map- ping and organofacies study in the Greater Balder Area, Norwegian North Sea. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Confer- ence Series 6(1), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1144/0061317 Justwan, H., Dahl, B., Isaksen, G.H. & Meisingset, I. 2005: Late to mid- dle Jurassic source facies and quality variations, South Viking Graben, North Sea. Journal of Petroleum Geology 28(3), 241–268. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2005.tb00082.x Justwan, H., Dahl, B. & Isaksen, G.H. 2006a: Geochemical characterisa- tion and genetic origin of oils and condensates in the South Viking Graben, Norway. Marine and Petroleum Geology 23(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2005.07.003 Justwan, H., Meisingset, I., Dahl, B. & Isaksen, G.H. 2006b: Geother- mal history and petroleum generation in the Norwegian South Viking Graben revealed by pseudo-3D basin modelling. Marine and Petroleum Geology 23(8), 791–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpetgeo.2006.07.001 Klemme, H.D. 1994: Petroleum systems of the World involving Upper Jurassic source rocks. In: Magoon, L.B & Dow, W.G (eds): The petro- leum system from source to trap. AAPG Memoir 60, 51–72. https://doi. org/10.1306/M60585C3 Leythaeuser, D. 1973: Effects of weathering on organic matter in shales. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 37(1), 113–120. https://doi. org/10.1016/0016-7037(73)90249-4 Littke, R., Klussmann, U., Krooss, B. & Leythaeuser, D. 1991: Quantifica- tion of loss of calcite, pyrite, and organic matter due to weathering of Toarcian black shales and effects on kerogen and bitumen character- istics. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55(11), 3369–3378. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90494-p Miller, R.G. 1990: A paleoceanographic approach to the Kimmeridge Clay Formation. In: Huc, A.Y. (ed.): Deposition of organic facies. AAPG Stud- ies in Geology 30, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1306/st30517c2  Morgans-Bell, H.S., Coe, A.I., Hesselbo, S.P., Jenkyns, H.C., Weedon, G.P., Marshall, J.E.A., Tyson, R.V. & Williams, C.J. 2001: Integrated stratig- raphy of the Kimmeridge clay formation (Upper Jurassic) based on exposures and boreholes in south Dorset, UK. Geological Magazine 138(5), 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756801005738 Möller, C., Mutterlose, J. & Alsen, P. 2015: Integrated stratigraphy of Lower Cretaceous sediments (Ryazanian–Hauterivian) from North-East Greenland. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo- ecology 437, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.014 Nytoft, H.P. 2011: Novel side chain methylated and hexacyclic hopanes: identification by synthesis, distribution in a worldwide set of coals and crude oils and use as markers for oxic depositional environments. Organic Geochemistry 42(5), 520–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. orggeochem.2011.03.006 Pan, S., Liao, Y., Jiang, B., Wan, Z. & Wang, F. 2022: Impact of natural weathering on source rocks: organic and inorganic geochemical evi- dence from the Triassic Chang 7 outcrop profile in Tongchuan of the Southern Ordos Basin (China). International Journal of Coal Geology 263, 104119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2022.104119 Pauly, S., Mutterlose, J. & Alsen, P 2012: Lower Cretaceous (upper Ryazanian–Hauterivian) chronostratigraphy of high latitudes (North- East Greenland). Cretaceous Research 34, 308–326. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cretres.2011.11.011 Pepper, A.S. & Corvi, P.J. 1995a: Simple kinetic models of petro- leum formation. Part I: oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Petroleum Geology 12(3), 291–319. https://doi. org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)98381-e  Pepper, A.S. & Corvi, P.J., 1995b: Simple kinetic models of petroleum for- mation, Part III: modelling an open system. Marine and Petroleum Geology 12(4), 417–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)96904-5 Petsch, S.T., Berner, R.A. & Eglinton, T.I. 2000: A field study of the chemical weathering of ancient sedimentary organic matter. Organic Geochem- istry 31(5), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00014-0 Peters, K.E., Walters, C.C. & Moldowan, J.M. 2005: The biomarker guide, volumes 1+2, 1155 pp. Cambridge University Press. Petersen, H.I., Nytoft, H.P., Vosgerau, H., Andersen, C., Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A. & Mathiesen, A. 2010: Source rock quality and maturity and oil types in the NW Danish Central Graben: implications for petroleum prospectivity evaluation in an Upper Jurassic sandstone play area. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series 7(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1144/0070095 Piasecki, S., Bojesen-Koefoed, J.A. & Alsen, P. 2020: Geology of the Lower Cretaceous in the Falkebjerg area, Wollaston Forland, north- ern East Greenland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 68, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.37570/bgsd-2020-68-07 Radke, M., Willsch, H. & Welte, D.H. 1980: Preparative hydrocarbon group determination by automated medium pressure liquid chroma- tography. Analytical Chemistry 52(3), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ac50053a009  Raiswell, R. & Berner, R.A. 1986: Pyrite and organic matter in Phanero- zoic normal marine shales. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50(9), 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90252-8 Requejo, A.G., Hollywood, J. & Halpern, H.I. 1989: Recognition and source correlation of migrated hydrocarbons in Upper Jurassic Hareelv Forma- tion, Jameson Land, East Greenland. AAPG Bulletin 73(9), 1065–1088. https://doi.org/10.1306/44b4a53c-170a-11d7-8645000102c1865d  Sass, H. & Cypionka, H. 2007: Response of sulphate-reducing bacteria to oxygen. In: Barton, L. & Hamilton, W. (eds): Sulphate-reducing bac- teria: Environmental and engineered systems, 167–184. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541490.006 Scotchman, I.C, Doré, A.G. & Spencer, A.M. 2016: Petroleum systems and results of exploration on the Atlantic margins of the UK, Faroes & Ireland: what have we learnt? Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series 8(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1144/ PGC8.14 Searl, A. 1994: Diagenetic destruction of reservoir potential in shallow marine sandstones of the Broadford Beds (Lower Jurassic), north- west Scotland: depositional versus burial and thermal history con- trols on porosity destruction. Marine and Petroleum Geology 11(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(94)90090-6  Sneider, J.S., DeClarens, P. & Vail, P.R. 1995: Sequence stratigraphy of the Middle to Upper Jurassic, Viking Graben, North Sea. In: Steel, R.J. et al. (eds): Sequence stratigraphy on the Northwest European margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications 5, 167–197. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0928-8937(06)80068-8  Strogen, D.P., Burwood, R. & Whitham, A.G. 2005: Sedimentology and geochemistry of Late Jurassic organic-rich shelfal mudstones from https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.05.018 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v21.4735 https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2022-058 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8349 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8349 https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2017.1396981 https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2017.1396981 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v42 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v1.4679 https://doi.org/10.1306/8626ca23-173b-11d7-8645000102c1865d https://doi.org/10.1306/8626ca23-173b-11d7-8645000102c1865d https://doi.org/10.1144/0061317 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2005.tb00082.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2005.tb00082.x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2005.07.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2006.07.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2006.07.001 https://doi.org/10.1306/M60585C3 https://doi.org/10.1306/M60585C3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(73)90249-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(73)90249-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90494-p https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90494-p https://doi.org/10.1306/st30517c2 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756801005738 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.03.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.03.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2022.104119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2011.11.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2011.11.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)98381-e https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)98381-e https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)96904-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00014-0 https://doi.org/10.1144/0070095 https://doi.org/10.37570/bgsd-2020-68-07 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50053a009 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50053a009 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90252-8 https://doi.org/10.1306/44b4a53c-170a-11d7-8645000102c1865d https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541490.006 https://doi.org/10.1144/PGC8.14 https://doi.org/10.1144/PGC8.14 https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(94)90090-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-8937(06)80068-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-8937(06)80068-8 Bojesen-Koefoed et al. 2023: GEUS Bulletin 55. 8320. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 24 of 24 GEUSBULLETIN.ORG East Greenland: regional and stratigraphic variations in source-rock quality. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series 6(1), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1144/0060903 Surlyk, F. 1978: Submarine fan sedimentation along fault scarps on tilted fault blocks (Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary, East Greenland). Bulletin Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse 128, 117. https://doi. org/10.34194/bullggu.v128.6670 Surlyk, F. 1984: Fan-delta to submarine fan conglomerates of the Volgian-Valanginian Wollaston Forland Group, East Greenland. In: Koster, E.H. & Steel, R.J. (eds): Sedimentology of gravel and con- glomerates. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 10, 359–382. Surlyk, F. 1990: A Jurassic sea-level curve for East Greenland. Palaeo- geography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 78, 71–85. https://doi. org/10.1016/0031-0182(90)90205-l Surlyk, F. 2003: The Jurassic of East Greenland: a sedimentary record of thermal subsidence, onset and culmination of rifting. In: Ineson, J.R. & Surlyk, F. (eds): The Jurassic of Denmark and Greenland. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 1, 659– 722. https://doi. org/10.34194/geusb.v1.4644 Surlyk, F. et al. 2021: Jurassic stratigraphy of East Greenland. GEUS Bulle- tin 46. 6521. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v46.6521 Surlyk, F. & Clemmensen, L.B. 1983: Rift propagation and eustacy as controlling factors during Jurassic inshore and shelf sedimentation in Northern East Greenland. Sedimentary Geology 34, 119–143. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(83)90083-0 Surlyk, F. & Korstgård, J. 2013: Crestal unconformities on an exposed Jurassic tilted fault block, Wollaston Forland, East Greenland as an ana- logue for buried hydrocarbon traps. Journal of Marine and Petroleum Geology 44, 82−95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.009 Tang, X., Zhang, J., Liu,Y., Yang, C., Chen, Q., Dang, W. & Zhao, P. 2018: Geochemistry of organic matter and elements of black shale during weathering in Northern Guizhou, Southwestern China: Their mobi- lization and interconnection. Geochemistry 78(1), 140–151 http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2017.08.002 Taylor, G.H., Teichmüller, M., Davis, A., Diessel, C.F.K., Littke, R. & Robert, P. 1998: Organic Petrology, 704 pp. Gebruder Borntraeger. Telnæs, N., Isaksen, G.H. & Douglas, A.G. 1994: A geochemical investi- gation of samples from the Volgian Bazhenov Formation, Western Siberia, Russia. Organic Geochemistry 21(5), 545–558. https://doi. org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90105-8  Vischer, A. 1943: Die postdevonische Tektonik von Ostgrönland zwischen 74° und 75° N. Br. Kuhn Ø, Wollaston Forland, Clavering Ø und angrenzende Gebiete. Meddelelser om Grønland 133(1), 195. von der Dick, H., Meloche, J.D., Dwyer, J. & Gunther, P. 1989: Source-rock geochemistry and hydrocarbon generation in the Jeanne d’Arc Basin, Grand Banks, offshore eastern Canada. Journal of Petroleum Geology 12, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1989.tb00220.x  https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v55.8320 http://www.geusbulletin.org/ https://doi.org/10.1144/0060903 https://doi.org/10.34194/bullggu.v128.6670 https://doi.org/10.34194/bullggu.v128.6670 https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(90)90205-l https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(90)90205-l https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v1.4644 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v1.4644 https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v46.6521 https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(83)90083-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(83)90083-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2017.08.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2017.08.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90105-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90105-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1989.tb00220.x Organic geochemistry of an Upper Jurassic – Lower Cretaceous mudstone succession in a narrow graben setting, Wollaston Forland Basin, North-East Greenland 1. Introduction 2. Geological setting and stratigraphy of the drilled succession 3. Samples and methods 4. Results 4.1 Thermal maturity 4.2 Petroleum potential and organic facies variations 4.3 Outcrop versus borehole samples: weathering effects 5. Discussion 5.1 Thermal maturity 5.2 Petroleum potential and organic facies variations 5.3 Outcrop versus borehole samples: weathering effects 5.4 KinexTM modelling 6. Conclusions Acknowledgments Funding statement Competing interests Author contributions References Figures Fig. 1 Location maps. Overview map (left). Positions of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes on Wollaston Forland are shown on a simplified geological map (right). K.F.: Kuhn fault; P.F.: Permpas Fault; H.F.: Hühnerbjerg Fault; D.F.: Dombjerg Fault. The Dombjerg Fault was the main fault to control the position of the coastline during the Late Jurassic. The Permpas–Hühnerbjerg block(s) was bounded by the Kuppel and Fig. 2 Conceptual, approximately SW–NE-oriented cross-section of Clavering Ø – Wollaston Forland, showing multiple westward-tilted fault blocks. Modified from Birkelund & Perch-Nielsen (1976) and Vischer (1943). Fig. 3 Stratigraphic models of the Wollaston Forland – Kuhn Ø area. Left: the original stratigraphy by Surlyk (2003). Right: the revised stratigraphy after drilling of the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes and incorporating changes introduced by Surlyk et al. (2021). The revised succession is much more complete and richer in mudstone than suggested by the original. East Greenl. Tect. Strat. Seq.: East Greenland Tectono-stratigraphic sequence. U: Upper. M: Middle. L: Lower. Abbreviations for geology are as follows: STR: Stratumbjerg Formation. R: Rødryggen Member. F: Falske Bugt Member. Pa: Palnatokes Bjerg Formation (Young Sund Member). Al: Albrechts Bugt Member. N: Niesen Member. Li: Lindemans Bugt Formation. Li (S): Lindemans Bugt Formation (Storsletten Member). Ri: Rigi Member. L: Laugeites Ravine Member. B: Bernbjerg Formation. Ug: Ugpik Ravine Member. J: Jakobsstigen Formation. Pay: Payer Dal Formation. Pe: Pelion Formation. Mu: Muslingebjerg Formation. Ba: Bastians Dal Formation. Black dashes indicate uncertain contact. Black vertical lines indicate boreholes, R-1: Rødryggen-1; BH-1: Brorson Halvø-1. Fig. 4 Thermal maturity parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b. rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes taking into account stratigraphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compensated for by assuming that the thickness of the missing section equals the equivalent section in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, which shows no hiatus. Hence, only samples of the Rødryggen-1 borehole show true drilled depths, while samples below the hiatus in the Brorson Halvø-1 section have been shifted to greater depths and may even appear deeper than the total depth (TD) of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Fig. 5 Organic geochemical screening parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b. rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols/lines) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols/lines) boreholes taking into account stratigraphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023, this volume). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compensated for by assuming that the thickness of the missing section equals the equivalent section in the Rødryggen-1 borehole, which shows no hiatus. Hence, only samples of the Rødryggen-1 borehole show true drilled depths, while samples below the hiatuses in the Brorson Halvø-1 section have been shifted to greater depths and may even appear deeper than the total depth (TD) of the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Stratigraphic ages as defined by the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Fig. 6 Standard plots of organic geochemical screening data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Fig. 7 Standard plots of organic geochemical screening data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Fig. 8 Assessment of HIlive (i.e. HI of the actively petroleum-generating part of the kerogen) and dead carbon (i.e. the carbon fraction that is inert with respect to petroleum generation) per stratigraphic unit of the Rødryggen-1 borehole, following the procedure of Dahl et al. (2004). Data are listed in Table 3. S2: Pyrolytic hydrocarbons (mg/g) from Rock-Eval pyrolysis. TOC: Total organic carbon. Fig. 9 Biological marker data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Characteristic fingerprints of samples representing the upper (sample #17895, 37.88 m, upper Volgian) and lower (sample #18086, 216.55 m, Kimmeridgian) parts of the drilled succession. GC-MS-MS parent–daughter traces for steranes and hopanes represent the sum of five and nine parent–daughter transitions, respectively. Fig. 10 Biological marker data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole. Characteristic fingerprints of samples representing the upper (sample #18623, 64.23 m, lower Volgian) and lower (sample #18889, 224.69 m, Kimmeridgian) parts of the drilled succession. GC-MS-MS parent–daughter traces for steranes and hopanes represent the sum of five and nine parent–daughter transitions, respectively. Fig. 11 Biological marker parameters versus drilled depth below reference level (b.rfl.) for the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols) boreholes (upper panels) and the Rødryggen-1 (red symbols) and Brorson Halvø-1 (blue symbols) boreholes taking into account stratigraphic information (lower panels; Alsen et al. 2023). Two hiatuses in the succession penetrated by the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole have been compensated Fig. 12 Stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) of total extracts versus pristane/phytane ratio. Note gradual isotopic depletion occurs parallel to decreasing average pristane/phytane ratio up-section. Plot modified from Chung et al. (1992). Fig. 13 Comparison of outcrop and borehole data at the Rødryggen-1 drill site. The outcrop profile was sampled using the sharp boundary to the Albrechts Bugt Member as datum. Orange curve: outcrop data. Black curve: Drill-core samples. Fig. 14 Ultimate Expulsion Potential (UEP) of the cored shale section on Rødryggen-1 borehole. The UEP profile through the shales shows varying source-rock quality and generation potential in terms of generation products. The shales are relatively gas-prone, but the middle Volgian to Ryazanian shales are mostly oil-prone. L.: Lower. M.: Middle. U.: Upper. Fig. 15 Cumulative expelled C6+ hydrocarbons (oil, HC6+) and C1–5 hydrocarbons (gas, HC1–6) of the Rødryggen-borehole. Oil generation terminates at about 1.0–1.1% Ro. Fig. 16 Summary of the combined stratigraphic coverage of the Blokelv-1 (Jameson Land), Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes (Wollaston Forland). For details on the Blokelv-1 borehole, see Ineson & Bojesen-Koefoed (2018). Combined information from the three boreholes indicates that deposition of organic-rich mudstones with petroleum- Tables Table 1 Summary of organic geochemical data per stratigraphic interval of the Rødryggen-1 borehole Table 2 Summary of organic geochemical data per stratigraphic interval of the Brorson Halvø-1 boreho Table 3 Average contents of inert carbon and hydrogen index values of the reactive kerogen fraction per stratigraphic interval of the Rødryggen-1 borehole. Calculated using the method of Dahl et al. (2004) Table 4 Key biological marker data from the Rødryggen-1 borehole Table 5 Key biological marker data from the Brorson Halvø-1 borehole