Close-range photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association ISSN 2380-7601 Volume 5 2018 © 2018 Utah Geological Association. All rights reserved. For permission to copy and distribute, see the following page or visit the UGA website at www.utahgeology.org for information. Email inquiries to GIW@utahgeology.org. CLOSE-RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY OF THE CLEVELAND-LLOYD DINOSAUR QUARRY, UPPER JURASSIC MORRISON FORMATION, EMERY COUNTY, UTAH Jonathan P. Warnock, Joseph E. Peterson, Steven R. Clawson, Neffra A. Matthews, and Brent H. Breithaupt Theme Issue An Ecosystem We Thought We Knew— The Emerging Complexities of the Morrison Formation SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY Annual Meeting, October 26 – 29, 2016 Grand America Hotel Salt Lake City, Utah, USA GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association ISSN 2380-7601 Production Cover Design and Desktop Publishing Douglas A. Sprinkel Cover Orthomosaic map of the 2015–2017 excavations of the South Butler Building at the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry produced from photogrammetry and standard grid mapping. The Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry is located on the San Rafael Swell, Emery County, Utah. i Become a member of the UGA to help support the work of the Association and receive notices for monthly meetings, annual field conferences, and new publi- cations. Annual membership is $20 and annual student membership is only $5. Visit the UGA website at www.utahgeology.org for information and membership application. The UGA board is elected annually by a voting process through UGA members. However, the UGA is a volunteer-driven organization, and we welcome your voluntary service. If you would like to participate please contact the current president or committee member corresponding with the area in which you would like to volunteer. Utah Geological Association formed in 1970 from a merger of the Utah Geological Society, founded in 1946, and the Intermountain Association of Geologists, founded in 1949. Affiliated with the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Volume 5 2018 This is an open-access article in which the Utah Geological Association permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of text and figures that are not noted as copyrighted, provided the original author and source are credited. Douglas A. Sprinkel Utah Geological Survey 801.391.1977 GIW@utahgeology.org Bart J. Kowallis Brigham Young University 801.422.2467 bkowallis@gmail.com Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr. Utah Geological Survey 801.537.3364 tomchidsey@utah.gov Steven Schamel GeoX Consulting, Inc. 801.583-1146 geox-slc@comcast.net Editors President Peter Nielsen peternielsen@utah.gov 801.537.3359 President-Elect Leslie Heppler lheppler@utah.gov 801.538.5257 Program Chair Gregory Schlenker gcsgeoscience@gmail.com 801.745.0262 Treasurer Dave Garbrecht garbrechtd@yahoo.com 801.916.1911 Secretary George Condrat gcondrat@loughlinwater.com 435.649.4005 Past President Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 UGA Board October 2018 – September 2019 UGA Committees Environmental Affairs Craig Eaton eaton@ihi-env.com 801.633.9396 Geologic Road Sign Terry Massoth twmassoth@hotmail.com 801.541.6258 Historian Paul Anderson paul@pbageo.com 801.364.6613 Outreach Greg Nielson gnielson@weber.edu 801.626.6394 Membership Rick Ford rford@weber.edu 801.626.6942 Public Education Paul Jewell pwjewell@mines.utah.edu 801.581.6636 Matt Affolter gfl247@yahoo.com Publications Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 Publicity Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 Social/Recreation Roger Bon rogerbon@xmission.com 801.942.0533 AAPG House of Delegates 2017–2020 Term Tom Chidsey tomchidsey@utah.gov 801.537.3364 State Mapping Advisory Committe UGA Representative Jason Blake blake-j@comcast.net 435.658.3423 UGA Newsletter Newsletter Editor Bill Lund uga.newsletter@gmail.com 435.590.1338 UGA Website www.utahgeology.org Webmasters Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 Earthquake Safety Committe Chair Grant Willis gwillis@utah.gov 801.537.3355 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Editors Kelli C. Trujillo — University of Wyoming John Foster — Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum Cary Woodruff — University of Toronto Octavio Mateus — Universidade Nova de Lisboa GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association ISSN 2380-7601 Volume 5 2018 271 ABSTRACT Bone distribution data are essential for taphonomic assessments of bonebeds. The Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry (CLDQ), an Allosaurus-dominated bonebed within the Upper Jurassic Morrison For- mation, has been researched for nearly 100 years, but published maps are scarce considering the impor- tance and density of the assemblage. Additionally, few detailed maps of bones from the CLDQ have been published in two dimensions, whereas the third, the stratigraphic/vertical, dimension has never been re- corded. Utilizing standard field mapping techniques as well as photogrammetry, the three-dimensional orientations of bones currently exposed in the quarry have been analyzed for potential dispersal patterns. Additionally, a “living” or continuously updatable, photogrammetric map which allows for researchers to view the bones in three dimensions throughout the course of excavation has been created. Continued photogrammetry in future field seasons will allow visualization of bones in three dimensions even after the currently exposed bones have been removed. Utilizing these newly available data, two distinct clusters of bone within the South Butler Building at the quarry are identified. Based on statistically significant average orientations and depths of these bones, early-stage post-mortem transport of carcasses prior to disartic- ulation (i.e., bloat and float) is supported as an important transport and depositional process within the quarry assemblage. Furthermore, possible evidence of multiple depositional events is discussed. Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Jonathan P. Warnock1*, Joseph E. Peterson2, Steven R. Clawson3, Neffra A. Matthews4, and Brent H. Breithaupt5 1Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Department of Geoscience, 302 East Walk, Indiana, PA 15705; jwarnock@iup.edu 2University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Department of Geology, 800 Algoma Blvd, Oshkosh, WI 54901; petersoj@uwosh.edu 33315 Cascade Ln., New Lenox, IL 60451; srclawson@comcast.net 4Bureau of Land Management National Operations Center, Geospatial Section, Denver Federal Center, Bldg. 50, P.O. Box 25047, OC-534, Denver, CO 80225-0047; n1matthe@blm.gov 5Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009; bbreitha@blm.gov *Corresponding Author Citation for this article. Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H., 2018, Close-range photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah: Geology of the Intermountain West, v. 5, p. 271–285. © 2018 Utah Geological Association. All rights reserved. For permission to use, copy, or distribute see the preceeding page or the UGA website, www.utahgeology.org, for information. Email inquiries to GIW@utahgeology.org. INTRODUCTION Upper Jurassic bonebeds of the Morrison Formation are typically sauropod-dominated, with theropods be- ing comparatively rare (Engelmann and others, 2004). Whereas the dominance of sauropods is possibly a re- flection of Late Jurassic ecosystems (Dodson and oth- ers, 1980), low predator:prey ratios may also represent taphonomic bias resulting from pre-burial depositional winnowing and weathering of the more easily-trans- portable and easily weathered theropod bone elements (Voorhies, 1969; Behrensmeyer, 1975; Gates, 2005). 272 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 One notable exception, with a predator:prey ratio of 3:1, is the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry (CLDQ) on the north end of the San Rafael Swell, Emery Coun- ty, east-central Utah (figure 1), a macrofossil bonebed comprised primarily of the predatory theropod, Allo- saurus fragilis (Miller and others, 1996). The bonebed is also unusual in that the large number of Allosaurus preserved at the quarry (n = 46) are dominated by sub- adult individuals (Madsen, 1976). As a result of the distinctly high predator:prey ra- tio, the CLDQ has frequently been treated as an anom- aly and mystery in the literature (e.g., Madsen, 1976; Bilbey, 1999; Gates, 2005; Hunt and others, 2006). A robust taphonomic interpretation of the bonebed is needed in order to understand the CLDQ in relation to Jurassic paleoecology of the region. Additionally, the subadult:adult ratio at the CLDQ cannot be fully in- terpreted further without development of the quarry’s taphonomic model. Understanding whether subadults were more common than adults within the paleogeo- graphic region, or preferentially deposited at the CLDQ for another reason, requires a detailed understanding of the processes which lead to the deposition of the bonebed. Many competing taphonomic hypotheses have been put forth regarding the CLDQ. Early hypotheses fo- cused on a predator trap, where a few dying herbivores attracted large numbers of carnivores (Dodson and oth- ers, 1980; Stokes, 1985; Richmond and Morris, 1996), even though expected taphonomic evidence (i.e., gnaw marks and trampling of bone) to support these con- clusions is not present at the site (Gates, 2005). Bilbey (1999) suggested the deposit represents a lethal spring or seep; however, no source of toxin is suggested. Fur- thermore, it is unlikely that dinosaurs would have been poisoned to the extent that they would have died at the site of the seep upon drinking. Other authors (e.g., Gates, 2005) have evoked a drought-induced assem- blage. While the surface textures of most of the recov- ered bones do not suggest post-mortem subaerial expo- sure in a dry environment, the presence of abundant, small parautochthonous bone fragments dispersed throughout the quarry matrix suggests that subaerial exposure and intense weathering of some bones was oc- curring (Gates, 2005; Peterson and others, 2017). Peter- son and others (2017) utilized novel intramatrix bone fragment (IBF) data and geochemical profiling of bones and sediment in an attempt to synthesize and under- stand these competing hypotheses. Their data suggest that the deposit represents periods of aridity, leading to the generation of IBF’s, followed by one or more flood periods in which the IBF’s were incorporated with sedi- ment and dinosaur carcasses, creating a hypereutrophic ephemeral pond. This hypothesis incorporates compo- nents of drought and ‘bloat and float’ deposition as well as flooding (Peterson and others, 2017). A key piece of taphonomic data is missing from all these studies and hypotheses however: three-dimensional (3D) bone dis- tribution. Despite a great diversity of studies that use the CLDQ as the primary site of study (e.g., Stokes, 1945; Figure 1. The Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry (CLDQ) is located in east-central Utah about 185 km (115 mi) southeast of Salt Lake City, Utah. 273 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Bilbey; 1999, Hanna, 2002; Suarez, 2003; Gates, 2005; Hunt and others, 2006; Carpenter, 2010; Peterson and others, 2017), maps representing previously excavated bones contain some anomalous gaps (Stokes, 1985), and a lack of 3D distribution of bones. The scope of many studies conducted throughout the 20th century (e.g., Gilmore, 1920; Stokes, 1945; Madsen, 1976) fo- cused on the collection of impressive museum spec- imens and placed little emphasis on mapping, leaving modern studies at risk of falling prey to cartographic artifacts (Stokes, 1985). Notably, the CLDQ was un- protected and worked by amateur collectors over the period of time spanning the professional collection of bones by Princeton University in 1939 and the Univer- sity of Utah in 1960 (Madsen, 1976). Due to a lack of cooperation in compiling data, composite maps of the bonebed, including a popularly cited map drafted by the University of Utah Cooperative Dinosaur Project in 1967, offer only general two-dimensional (2D) esti- mations of the original spatial distribution of bone, and lack any description of stratigraphic position or plunge of bones. Additionally, the available composite map of the quarry contains many numerous artifacts, including artificial right angles at the edges of the bonebed and gaps within bone deposition. In order to understand the depositional history of the quarry, as well as being able to determine whether or not the Allosaurus bones were deposited during a single or multiple events, 3D bone orientation data is needed. In order to address these issues, grid maps com- posed of previously and recently exposed bones have been drafted over the 2015–2017 field seasons. These maps include depth data relative to a fixed arbitrary da- tum within the South Butler Building at the quarry as well as depth relative to the undulatory surface of the freshwater limestone cap, which overlies the productive siltstone bonebed for which the site is famous. Final- ly, we present a “living” photogrammetric map of the quarry which contains 3D bone orientation data. The map is referred to as living because new data, in the form of photographs from future excavations as well as positions of newly exposed bones, can be added to the current file. Digital photogrammetry, or the process of three-di- mensionally reconstructing the surface texture and to- pography of objects using oriented digital photographs, offers a modern, precise means of resolving the relative positions of bone (Matthews, 2008), and has already seen some applications in the field of vertebrate pale- ontology (see Breithaupt and others, 2004; Falking- ham, 2012; Matthews and others, 2016; and references therein). In the present study, a high-fidelity 3D photo- grammetric data file produced for the CLDQ over the course of three field seasons provides a more accurate representation of the quarry assemblage than previous- ly published maps. GEOLOGICAL SETTING, TAPHONOMY, AND HISTORY OF THE CLEVELAND- LLOYD DINOSAUR QUARRY The CLDQ is located approximately 38 m above the basal contact of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation (Bilbey, 1992; Peterson and oth- ers, 2017). The numerous dinosaur fossils in the quar- ry are encased in a structureless calcareous mudstone composed primarily of montmorillonite with various silicate minerals (e.g., quartz, feldspar, and biotite). The bonebed ranges in thickness from centimeters to ap- proximately 1 meter. The silty calcareous mudstone is overlain by a bone-bearing micritic limestone unit that varies in thickness from 0.3 to 1.0 m (Bilbey, 1992; Gates, 2005). The limestone contains notably fewer bones than the silty mudstone. Based on limited exposures, the silty mudstone unit is laterally continuous for 50 to 75 m be- fore pinching out to the south (Gates, 2005). A total of ten dinosaur genre are present at the quar- ry including two ornithischian taxa (Stegosaurus and Camptosaurus), three sauropod taxa (Camarasaurus, Barosaurus, and Apatosaurus), and five theropod taxa (Allosaurus, Ceratosaurus, Stokesosaurus, Marshosau- rus, and Torvosaurus) (Gates, 2005; Foster and Peter- son, 2016). Of all the present taxa, Allosaurus fragilis is the most abundant (46 skeletons) composing 66% of the total skeletons (Gates, 2005). Due to its abnormal abundance of large theropod dinosaur skeletons, the CLDQ has received unrivaled attention in regards to taphonomic investigations and depositional interpretations over the last 85 years. The quarry was first formally excavated in 1926 (Miller and 274 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 others, 1996), though the first extensive work at the quarry did not begin until 1939, led by W.L. Stokes and a field crew from Princeton University (Stokes, 1945). From the 1960s through 2005 the quarry was worked intermittently by various field crews, most of which were based in Utah (e.g., Madsen 1976; Miller and oth- ers, 1996; Gates, 2005; Hunt and others, 2006). In 1968, the CLDQ was recognized as a U.S. Natural Landmark and is currently managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), followed by the installation of two metal Butler buildings in the late 1970s (Miller and oth- ers, 1996). While the site receives frequent visitors and is a positive tourism spot for the state of Utah, the enig- matic nature of the fossil assemblage has produced nu- merous theories by the equally numerous taphonomic studies; this fact was noted by Madsen (1976, p. 8), who stated, “Theories of the demise of the Cleveland-Lloyd di- nosaurs are but slightly fewer in numbers than the visitors to the quarry.” Since its discovery in 1926, the CLDQ has yielded over 10,000 dinosaur bones (Gates, 2005). However, the various field expeditions that have excavated the quarry during that time have each established a different mapping method, many of which are not compatible with previous quarry maps. Whereas various depositional models have been proposed for the CLDQ, the lithologies, abundant vertebrate macrofossils, and rare microvertebrate and in- vertebrate remains suggest an ephemeral pond or similar overbank deposit with a fluctuating water table (calcareous mudstone facies) that became more permanently hydrat- ed in the form of a shallow lacustrine setting (limestone facies) (Bilbey, 1999; Gates, 2005; Peterson and others, 2017). The presence of freshwater ostracods, gastropods, and charophytes in the limestone cap over the bone-bear- ing mudstone suggests that the environment supported a freshwater ecosystem during the last stages of sediment filling the pond (Bilbey, 1992). An ash bed approximately 1 m above the limestone cap has been dated to 147.2 ± 1 Ma to 146.8 ± 1 Ma via K/Ar dating (Bilbey, 1998). METHODOLOGY Field Excavation and Stabilization Fieldwork was performed at the CLDQ between 2015 to 2017 by field crews from the University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh and Indiana University of Penn- sylvania. A total of 55 bones were mapped and photo- graphed within the South Butler Building, representing bones exposed by previous expeditions and left exposed in the South Butler Building as well as newly exposed elements. Grid Mapping A grid map of the quarry was constructed using U.S. customary units, as this matches the data generated by the BLM previously (figure 2). Standard grid mapping of the South Butler Building was completed using a yard-by-yard PVC grid, containing 15 x 15 cm minor grid squares. Only data from the South Butler Building was used for this study, as the sample set available in the North Butler Building is skewed to bones at the base of the deposit. A 1-yard square grid frame construct- ed from PVC tubing and nylon cord on adjustable legs was aligned to a master grid line strung across the en- tire area of the quarry from fixed datums. This square was used to measure the position of bones within the larger master grid. Subsequently, the depth from an ar- bitrary fixed datum, the upper surface of the concrete foundation of the buildings, was measured via plumb bob at the ends of each bone, allowing for the calcula- tion of dip and precise stratigraphic placement of each element. Field specimen numbers, including element field identifications and notes, were recorded according to the format established by prior crews; for example, CLDQ-001-17 was the first recorded specimen of 2017. Furthermore, the thickness of the undulating overlying limestone cap was measured in relation to the building foundation and bone position. The resulting map presents the distribution of bones, with accompanying 3D orientation data (figures 2 and S1, table 1). Cardinal orientation was measured outside of the magnetic influence of the steel Butler Buildings (a likely reason for the cardinal inaccuracy of many maps drafted of the quarry after to the construction of the buildings in 1969) using a standard azimuthal com- pass-clinometer, adjusted for magnetic declination (11° 5' E). Subsequently, each bone element was plotted as a point in two cross sections along the long axis of the 275 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 South Butler building (35° west of north), utilizing depth and position data collected in the field. In addi- tion to the bone position, the limestone thickness was plotted (figure 3). Two such cross sections were created in order to accommodate the lateral variability in lime- stone thickness, one through row B and one through row C of the master grid (figures 2 and 3). Rows A and D have not been plotted to date due to the small num- ber of bones exposed in those grid rows. Photogrammetry Photographs were taken using a Nikon D3000 sin- gle-lens reflex (SLR) camera, maintaining an 18 mm focal length. Excluding a few skylights on the ceiling, quarry windows were covered with shades to minimize lighting effects. For the purposes of this photogram- metric map, three rounds of photography were nec- essary: 90° (vertical, facing the quarry floor), 45° (in- termediate, at an oblique angle with the quarry floor), and 0° (horizontal, facing the quarry wall), performed in a circular pattern around the inside of the building in two series: facing inward and facing outward. Four sets of photographic documentation took place; one in 2015 (547 photos), two collected in 2016 (436 and 446 photos), and one 2017 (404 photos). Calibrated photo- grammetric targets were used during each photography session. Two methods were utilized when placing the targets. First, a series of targets were placed along the building’s foundation at the location of the master grid lines. These targets served to align the grid map to the photogrammetric map. A second set of movable photo- grammetric targets were placed within the excavation area and were repositioned between each photogram- Figure 2. Standard grid map of the 2015–2017 excavations of the South Butler Building at the CLDQ. 276 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Field # Field ID Length (cm) Width (cm) Grid Square Depth from Foundation (cm) Limestone Thickness (cm) Depth Below Limestone (cm) Orientation with respect to North (°) CLDQ-S-17-001 Rib 33 5 B1 121 31.75 74.25 175 CLDQ-S-17-002 Scap 128 48 B2-B3 122 29.21 77.79 14 CLDQ-S-17-003 Rib 13 2.5 B2 140.5 29.21 96.29 173 CLDQ-S-17-004 Toe 4 3 B2 119 29.21 74.79 20 CLDQ-S-17-005 Indet. 11 6 B2 111 29.21 66.79 20 CLDQ-S-17-006 Vertebra 11 10 B2 113 29.21 68.79 41 CLDQ-S-17-007 Toe 3.5 3 B2 113 29.21 68.79 6 CLDQ-S-17-008 Vertebra 15 14 B3 129 43.18 70.82 10 CLDQ-S-17-009 Vertebra 38 8 B3 123 43.18 64.82 X CLDQ-S-17-010 Jacket 126 38 B4 94.5 49.53 29.97 X CLDQ-S-17-011 Vertebra 56 32 B5 97.5 49.53 32.97 105 CLDQ-S-17-012 Rib 6.5 1.5 B4 102 49.53 37.47 35 CLDQ-S-17-013 Rib 24 3.5 B4 107.5 49.53 42.97 110 CLDQ-S-17-014 Centrum 9 8 B5 99.5 49.53 34.97 X CLDQ-S-17-015 Rib 54 5.5 B5 100 38.35 46.65 160 CLDQ-S-17-016 Limb 18.5 5 B5 99 38.35 45.65 155 CLDQ-S-17-017 Rib 6.5 2.5 B5 100 38.35 46.65 35 CLDQ-S-17-018 Limb 14 6 B5 103 38.35 49.65 165 CLDQ-S-17-019 Limb 19 4 B5 98 38.35 44.65 90 CLDQ-S-17-020 Pelvic 37 20 B6 92 29.21 47.79 33 CLDQ-S-17-021 Femur 20 12 C6 98 58.42 24.58 155 CLDQ-S-17-022 Limb 26 17 C6 91 58.42 17.58 X CLDQ-S-17-023 Indet. 24 18 C6 94 58.42 20.58 X CLDQ-S-17-024 Rib 10 10 C6 92 58.42 18.58 73 CLDQ-S-17-025 Toe 5 2.5 C5 96 76.7 4.3 20 CLDQ-S-17-026 Meta 8 3 C5 106 76.7 14.3 43 CLDQ-S-17-027 Vertebra 12 12 C5 98 76.7 6.3 X CLDQ-S-17-028 Illium 50 24 C5 99 76.7 7.3 85 CLDQ-S-17-029 Rib 17 3 C5 96 76.7 4.3 155 CLDQ-S-17-030 Limb X X C5 103 76.7 11.3 35 CLDQ-S-17-031 Cervical rib 10 3 C4 110 90 5 155 CLDQ-S-17-032 Quadrate 13 7 C4 112 90 7 155 CLDQ-S-17-033 Rib 9 5 C4 105 90 0 155 CLDQ-S-17-034 Indet. 12 8 C4 113 90 8 X CLDQ-S-17-035 Centrum 10 7 C4 103 90 -2 X CLDQ-S-17-036 Zygopophysis 10 2 C4 109 90 4 100 CLDQ-S-17-037 Vertebra 8 6 C4 107 90 2 X CLDQ-S-17-038 Limb 11 3 C4 115 90 1 5 CLDQ-S-17-039 Femur (L) 36 10.5 C3 103 86.36 1.64 105 CLDQ-S-17-040 Surangular 27 8 C3 130 86.36 28.64 150 CLDQ-S-17-041 Vertebra 9.5 5.5 C2 115 58.42 41.58 85 CLDQ-S-17-042 Vertebra 6 3 C2 116 58.42 42.58 20 CLDQ-S-17-043 Dentary 12 7 C2 114 58.42 40.58 75 CLDQ-S-17-044 Atlas 10 2.5 C2 115 58.42 41.58 X CLDQ-S-17-045 Limb 49 5 C2 99 58.42 25.58 15 CLDQ-S-17-046 Indet. 3 2 C2 115.5 58.42 42.08 160 CLDQ-S-17-047 Vertebra 30 8 C2 119 58.42 45.58 165 CLDQ-S-17-048 Superior process 9 5 C2 119 58.42 45.58 20 CLDQ-S-17-049 Trans process 20 2.5 C2 120 58.42 46.58 38 CLDQ-S-17-050 Humerus 23.5 7 C1 100 63.5 21.5 35 CLDQ-S-17-051 Limb X X D3 102 86.36 0.64 180 CLDQ-S-17-052 Vertebra 19 17 C5 100 76.7 8.3 X CLDQ-S-17-053 Gastralia 50 10 C6 135 0 120 180 CLDQ-S-17-054 Caudal vert 5 2 C6 98 58.42 24.58 75 CLDQ-S-17-055 Rib 100 60 C4 146 90 41 X Table 1. Field specimen numbers and tentative field identifications are given for each bone in the South Butler Building. In addition, bone dimensions and positions are given. X = no data. 277 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Figure 3. Cross sections through the bonebed. Cross sections are presented through the B and C rows of the grid map (figure 1). Black dots represent the centers of bones found in each row. Each cross section represents a two-dimensional compres- sion of all of the bones found in each row. The thickness and undulatory lower surface of the limestone cap is shown. Fol- lowing the convention of mapping previously done by the BLM the horizontal axis is measured in feet rather than meters. 278 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 metric session as new stratigraphic levels were exposed. All targets served to provide real world units to the pho- togrammetric processing. All 1833 digital photographs taken of the quarry were imported into Agisoft Photo- scan Professional Edition, Version 1.3.2 Build 4205 (64 bit), an image-based 3D modeling/photogrammetric software package. Processing was conducted on a Dell Precision 7710 laptop with Intel Core 17 vPro proces- sor, 32 GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA Quadro M5000M graphics card running Windows 10. Software Procedure To ensure uniformity among the episodes of pho- tography all 1833 images were processed together in the same “chunk.” Agisoft Photoscan utilizes the term “chunk” to denote a grouping of images upon which the same structure from motion and alignment algorithms, as well as other processing functions, may be applied. The alignment was conducted with an accuracy setting of “High,” generic preselection was disabled so that all images were evaluated with each other for matches, key point limit was set to “80,000,” and tie-point limit was set to “0.” The time associated with this process- ing phase took 2 days and 21 hours for matching and 3 hours 23 minutes for alignment. The majority (97%) of images aligned successfully on high resulting in a sparse point cloud of over 7 million points. An error reduction and camera optimization workflow was followed (Mat- thews and others, 2016). Markers were placed along the upper surface of the concrete building foundation and cross beam at the master grid locations. The automatic coded target detection algorithm within Photoscan was used to mark the calibrated photogrammetric targets and for assignment of scale bars of appropriate length. The units of the Photoscan project were set to meters. At the conclusion of the error reduction and optimization phase a reprojection error of 0.343 pixels was reached. Factoring in an average image resolution of 0.494 mm per pixel and a grid marker error of 0.495 mm a total photogrammetric project error of 1 mm was achieved. The “rotate object” tools was used within Photoscan to effectively level the upper surface of the building foun- dation without skewing or warping the aligned point cloud. The local dip of the CLDQ, estimated under 2° northwest in the Huntington 30' x 60' quadrangle (Wit- kind, 1988), was considered negligible for leveling. A user-defined coordinate system was chosen and an ar- bitrary elevation of 10 m set for the foundation to avoid negative elevations. The chunk comprised of all episodes was duplicat- ed multiple times to correspond to the four episodes of photographic documentation. Within each duplicate chunk one episode was chosen and the images from oth- er episodes were disabled. Dense point clouds, meshes, a digital elevation model (DEM), and digital orthorec- tified image mosaics (orthomoasics) were generated for each episode chunk (table 2). The above procedure re- sulted in all of the photogrammetric products for each episode to be in a uniform coordinate system related to the quarry map grid system. The orthomoasics and DEM for each episode were brought into ArcMAP 10.4.1 and polygons were drawn for each bone element and labeled according to the quarry map (figure 4). All statistics gathered during the excavation were recorded in a spreadsheet that was Episode Number of Points in Dense Point Cloud Number of Faces in Mesh May 2017 66,967,408 (high quality) 49,848,948 June 27, 2016 54,458,463 (high quality) 49,866,034 June 23, 2016 63,239,516 (high quality) 49,922,374 June 2015 66,241,247 (high quality) 49,999,022 Table 2. Statistics for four photogrammetry episodes from 2015–2017, including number of points in each dense point cloud, number of faces in each mesh after decimation, resolution of each DEM, and resolution or each orthomosaic image. Note: decimation of the meshes to 50 million (50,000,000) was necessary to ensure response computer processing. 279 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Fi gu re 4 . O rt ho m os ai c m ap o f t he 2 01 5– 20 17 ex ca va tio ns o f t he S ou th B ut le r B ui ld in g at th e C le ve la nd -L lo yd D in os au r Q ua rr y pr od uc ed fr om p ho - to gr am m et ry an d st an da rd g rid m ap pi ng (fi gu re 1 ). Fi el d nu m be rs co rr es po nd to b on es d es ig na tio ns li st ed in ta bl e 1 . A n in te ra ct iv e P D F (fi gu re S 1) is lo ca te d in th e at ta ch m en t p an el . 280 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 joined to the digital quarry map. This allows for visu- alization of the quarry, in 3D space, based on multiple combination of factors (supplemental figure S1). Figure S1 is an interactive photogrammetric model of the ex- cavation in the South Butler Building at end of the 2017 field season that can be launched by clicking on figure S1 in the attachment panel. Activation of the Object Data Tool (Adobe) launches the interactive content, permit- ting selection of individual elements and browsing of element within the map, field number, measurements, depth data, and orientation. For bone designations refer to table 1. Statistical Analysis Circular means and Raleigh’s R test for two data subsets were calculated using PAST (Hammer and oth- ers, 2001). The data was separated into two bins to cal- culate circular means based on a gap in bone deposition along a north/south transect. The first mean is calcu- lated for bones found between 0 and 2.13 m (0 and 7 ft) from the north edge of the foundation of the South Butler Building (n = 19 bones) and the second mean represents bones found between 3.05 and 5.49 m (10 and 18 ft) from the north edge of the foundation (n = 29 bones). As above, feet were used rather than meters to insure continuity with the original grid set up by the Utah BLM. Three bones found between 2.13 and 3.05 m (7 and 10 ft) from the foundation were not included in the statistical analysis. Raleigh’s R test was used to de- termine the the significance of the two circular means (p < 0.05). Finally, PAST was used to test for a signifi- cant (p < 0.05) difference in mean depth between the two bone clusters described above. RESULTS Bone depth and orientation data are provided in table 1. Bone orientations ranged from 0 to 175° from north. The limestone thickness varied from 29 to 90 cm and was found to vary in both the north-south and east- west directions. Bones were found from the limestone/ siltstone contact to the base of current excavation. Photogrammetry produced a 3D model of the quar- ry (figure 3) which can also act as a realistic true to scale map view of the quarry. In addition, photogrammetric models produced throughout the course of excavation allow for the display of progressive excavation through the quarry (supplemental figure S2). Figure S2 is a “liv- ing map” of excavations. Animation showing the pro- gression of excavation over the course of the 2015–2017 field seasons. Subsequent rounds of photogrammetry can be added as field work continues, providing a visual means to assess the distribution and relative positions of bones even after they are removed from the quarry. The animation can be activated by clicking on figure S2 in the attachment panel. All photogrammetric products are to scale and provide a detailed view of the excava- tion. Two distinct clusters of bone were observed during excavation. The northernmost bone cluster was found to have an average orientation of 60.3° whereas the southernmost bone cluster has an average orientation of 101°. Both of these means were found to be signifi- cant. In addition, the north bone cluster has an average depth of 119 cm beneath the foundation of the South Butler Building, whereas the south bone cluster has an average depth of 102 cm. These means were found to be significantly different. DISCUSSION A robust orientation analysis is necessary to inter- pret the paleoenvironment of a bonebed (e.g., Voorhies, 1969; Behrensmeyer, 1975; Rogers and Kidwell, 2007; Mathews and others, 2009; Keenan and Scannella, 2014). The photogrammetric scalar field mesh pro- duced by this study offers a 3D alternative to 2D projec- tions for interpreting orientations. By collecting photo- grammetric data over the course of many field seasons, a “living” map can be generated (figure S2). This map allows for researchers to view individual bone horizons in three dimensions at multiple excavation levels and can be updated as frequently as new pictures are taken during excavation. By viewing subsequent years of pho- togrammetry, the placement of bones which have been removed can be compared to those still in place, allow- ing for detailed previously impossible visualization of the quarry assemblage in a stratigraphic context. Fur- thermore, photogrammetric maps can ground-truth field maps and orientation data collected during exca- 281 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 vation. The currently produced photogrammetric map includes embedded data for depth, size, orientation, and field identification of each bone element. The creation of a ‘living’ map, in which multiple stratigraphic horizons may be viewed by accessing data across multiple years of photogrammetry, is a novel fea- ture in vertebrate paleontology. Combining the afore- mentioned mapping techniques with photogrammetry reveals multiple depositional bone-bearing layers sep- arated by bone-free horizons. This new technique sug- gests the genesis of the assemblage could be owed to multiple overlapping depositional events. Additionally, abiotic taphonomic signals apparent in the photogram- metric map, e.g., clustering of bone, preferred orienta- tions and preferred depths, support the hypothesis that the CLDQ represents an ephemeral pond system peri- odically flooded with overbank sediments (sensu Peter- son and others, 2017). This new technique, one that can be continually updated by subsequent expeditions and hopefully any subsequent research groups, will help in- stitute a system for the collection of more precise bone orientation data at the CLDQ. The data presented here represent the first 3D bone distribution data published on the CLDQ since excava- tion began in 1926. Based on 3D analysis of bone posi- tion and orientation via field maps, photogrammetric maps and cross sections, the bones currently exposed in the South Butler Building can be separated into two main clusters and several isolated elements. The clus- ters are distinct in that they are physically separated into a northern and southern group. Furthermore, each cluster has a distinct and statistically significant orien- tation. Additionally, whereas there is some stratigraphic overlap, the northern bone group has a deeper average depth than the southern bone group relative to a fixed datum and the mean depths of each cluster are signifi- cantly different. It is worth noting that only a small area of the quarry has been mapped in such a way to provide this detailed 3D analysis. The results found here may or may not reflect conditions within the entire bonebed. Future excavation will provide the opportunity to check these results against other sections of the bonebed. Also striking is that the lateral extent of each cluster of bones is constrained by a single large bone and each cluster is composed of associated skeletal remains, al- though it is currently impossible to be certain the asso- ciated elements are from a single individual. The north- ern cluster of bones is primarily composed of associated Allosaurus skull elements as well as small vertebrae and associated pedal elements. These bones are clustered against the medial surface of a large (146 cm length) sauropod left scapula. The southern cluster is comprised mainly of disarticulated and associated vertebrae and disarticulated ribs which are clustered against two artic- ulated sauropod cervical vertebrae (63 cm total length). In both cases the large bone elements (scapula, articulat- ed vertebrae) create a surface against which the smaller bone elements came to rest. Furthermore, in both cas- es the smaller bones resting against the larger elements are associated skeletal elements. This data very strongly supports a bloat and float taphonomic scenario in those areas of the quarry studied and described herein. It is compelling to think about the scenario being pres- ent for the entire quarry, but because 3D data is not available for most the quarry area, this interpretation can only be speculated upon for the remainder of the bonebed. However, further work may provide addition- al evidence in this regard. This evidence suggests that bloat and float processes were important to the formation of the CLDQ depos- its. Bloat and float is a process which distributes bones from decaying corpses (e.g., Syme and Salisbury, 2014). During the early stages of decomposition, corpses bloat. This makes them buoyant and causes them to float. As the bodies continue to decay, segments of the body (i.e., a limb, head, or section of the vertebral column) fall off and rot further. As such, bloat and float processes should result in an accumulation of randomly scattered groupings of associated and articulated bone. If a strong current is present during the bloat and float process, these bones may accumulate against the surface of the depositional basin or fall and settle with a preferred orientation. It is worth noting, however, that bloat and float processes can lead to the deposition of whole skel- etons as well (e.g., Mallon and others, 2018). Bloat and float within the pond setting represented by the CLDQ deposit would result in bones being as- sociated as they distribute. This setting is influenced by both fluvial (e.g., deposition of sediments escaping the riverbed during high flow periods) and paludal (e.g., 282 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 settling and weak wind-induced wave action) process- es. We hypothesize that a weak current within the pond (e.g., short-term flow induced by wind blowing across the pond surface) would have moved rotting carcasses as they fell through the water column, occasionally rest- ing against larger previously deposited skeletal remains which had already sunk to the pond floor. For exam- ple, a partially decomposing Allosaurus skull may float into pond during a flood stage. During further decom- position, the skull would disarticulate and begin falling through the water column. While falling, elongated el- ements would orient parallel to any weak current, and settle against a large sauropod scapula and previously deposited vertebrae and pedal elements. These bones are then buried together, maintaining the orientation at depth. Those bones which did not come to rest against a larger element are represented by the isolated elements found within the quarry. It is also possible that desic- cated remains could have been washed into the CLDQ pond and rapidly buried to produce the pattern of bone deposition seen here. However, this would require the remains to have been exposed for only a short amount of time, as no evidence of flaking from exposure to the sun is evident on the bones. Furthermore, an increased number of scavenging traces would be expected on re- mains sitting at the surface. Past research at the CLDQ has suggested that the deposit may represent multiple depositional events (Pe- terson and others, 2017). The data presented here pro- vide further evidence that multiple depositional events may have occurred to create the CLDQ bonebed. The two identified clusters of bone both have distinct, sig- nificant orientations. This implies at least two flow di- rections were involved in the depositional history of this section of the quarry. Additionally, the two bone clusters have distinct mean depths. Whereas there is some overlap in the depths represented by these clus- ters, this could be due to the uneven surface of the bot- tom of the pond at the time of each depositional event. Multiple depositional events controlled primarily by bloat and float processes would lead to the formation of an undulatory surface at the bottom of the pond, as isolated clusters of bones draped with mud would cre- ate local topographic highs. The undulation of the lime- stone layer provides evidence of an uneven surface to the bottom of the pond, at least during the final phase of deposition. Burial after each depositional event must have been rapid, given that the bones are unabraided, nearly all lack vertebrate and insect scavenging marks, and lack evidence of physical weathering (Behrensmey- er, 1975; Gates, 2005). The spatial distribution of bone at the CLDQ is at odds with other Morrison Formation vertebrate locali- ties. Bones at the Mygatt-Moore Quarry are found dis- articulated and rarely associated (Kirkland and others, 2005) in an environment interpreted as a vernal pool on a poorly drained muddy floodplain, with abundant plant life, possibly from a surrounding woodland (Kirkland and others, 2005; Foster and Hunt-Foster, 2011; Foster and others, 2018). Hence, bone distribution data don’t currently support bloat and float processes at Mygatt- Moore. Four additional sauropod-dominated bonebeds from the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison For- mation (the Howe Quarry near Shell, Wyoming, the BS and SI Quarries near Thermopolis, Wyoming, and the Carnegie Museum Diplodocus Quarry near Sheep Creek, Wyoming) have similar lithologies to the CLDQ (i.e., calcareous mudstone) and also display consider- able disarticulation of skeletal remains (Michelis, 2004; Ikejiri and others, 2006; Jennings and Hasiotis, 2006; Brezinski and Kollar, 2008). All four sites are interpret- ed as low-energy, poorly drained floodplains associat- ed with seasonal palustrine or lacustrine depositional environments similar to that observed in the CLDQ. However, the high frequency of shed theropod teeth in close proximity to sauropod remains at the SI Quarry suggest active feeding took place, disarticulating the skeletal elements by biostratinomic processes (Jennings and Hasiotis, 2006). Both the SI and BS sites are inter- preted to represent single depositional events (Ikejiri and others, 2006; Jennings and Hasiotis, 2006) rather than cyclic processes (Peterson and others, 2017). Despite differences with other Morrison Forma- tion localities, similarities are evident between the CLDQ and smaller bonebeds that have been described from other formations. Fiorillo and others (2000) de- scribed a Placerias bonebed from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation that is interpreted as a low-energy environment that also possesses numerous carbonate nodules that are pedogenic in origin. Bones also pos- 283 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 sess minimal evidence of fluvial transport, trampling, or predation (Fiorillo and others, 2000). Keenan and Scannella (2014) described a Triceratops bonebed from the Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation (Garfield County, Montana). Whereas the bones of multiple Tric- eratops individuals were recovered in association (MNI = 3), differences among the abrasion and orientations of bones belonging to each individual suggest that ag- gregation of each carcass occurred through the force of multiple independent flooding events (Keenan and Scannella, 2014). The majority of bones at this bonebed are well preserved, showing little weathering and abra- sion or biostratinomic alteration providing further similarity to those of the CLDQ. Additionally, many of these bones are “stacked,” as observed in the clustered bones at the CLDQ. Unlike the CLDQ, the Triceratops bones are positioned in layers of clay-rich siltstone as- sociated with some microvertebrate remains (e.g., gar scales) (Keenan and Scannella, 2014) implying differ- ences in the freshwater environments represented by each site. Regardless, the similarity of orientation and stacking imply similar depositional processes, i.e., mul- tiple depositional events. A similar mode of genesis is evident in a second Tric- eratops bonebed recovered from the upper Hell Creek Formation in Carter County, Montana (the “Homer” locality) (Matthews and others, 2009). The bone-bear- ing layer is roughly 0.5 m thick, and comprises bones that show little to no abrasion, with some small, heav- ily abraded elements likely representing a background accumulation as a function of its position in a flood- plain (Matthews and others, 2009). Furthermore, these remains exhibit the same stacking pattern and are in some cases clustered against 2-m-long fossilized logs. This deposit represents only a single depositional event; however, bloat and float processes are likely given the association of elements. Similarities in the 3D clustering of bones at the CLDQ and the “Homer” locality support similar attritional processes, bloat and float, were signif- icant at both sites. CONCLUSION The maps and data presented here are significant in that they represent the first 3D data published on the distribution of bones from the CLDQ. Adding the ver- tical perspective to analysis of bone deposition allows for refined understanding of depositional processes. Based on bone orientation and clustering patterns, we hypothesize that bloat and float processes have led to the distribution of bones found within the quarry. This can be seen in the common association, but rare artic- ulation, of elements at the CLDQ. Additionally, bloat and float mechanisms would explain the clustering of numerous small associated bones against larger bones. Intriguingly, the spatial distribution of bones seen here suggests the possibility of multiple depositional events. If confirmed, the presence of multiple depositional lay- ers may have profound impacts on the understanding of Allosaurus ecology. Regardless, 3D mapping techniques have added to the understanding of taphonomic pro- cesses controlling the CLDQ. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Michael Leschin, ReBecca Hunt-Foster, and Greg McDonald of the Utah Office of the BLM for facilitating fieldwork and processing permits. All fieldwork was conducted under permit number UT12- 003E. Financial support was provided by the Universi- ty of Wisconsin–Oshkosh Faculty Development Fund (Grant #FDM250) and by the Utah Office of the BLM. Thanks to formal reviewers Stuart Pond (Stuart Pond Design Ltd.) and Matteo Belvedere (Section D’archéol- ogie et Paléontologie, Porrentruy, Switzerland), as well as James I. Kirkland (Utah Geological Survey) and Pe- ter L. Falkingham (Liverpool John Moores University), for reviewing the manuscript and offering constructive feedback. We also thank Richard G. Clawson for field and laboratory support during the 2012–2017 field sea- sons. Finally, we offer special thanks to the numerous volunteer field crews from the 2013 and 2017 field sea- sons. REFERENCES Behrensmeyer, A.K., 1975, The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages east of Lake Rudolf, Kenya: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 145, no. 10, p. 473–574. Bilbey, S.A., 1992, Stratigraphy and sedimentary petrology of the 284 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous rocks at Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry with a comparison to the Dinosaur National Monument Quarry: Salt Lake City, University of Utah, Ph.D. dissertation, 295 p. Bilbey, S.A., 1998, Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur quarry age, stratig- raphy and depositional environments, in Carpenter K., Chure D., and Kirkland J.I., editors, The Morrison Formation—an in- terdisciplinary study: Modern Geology, v. 23, p. 87–120. Bilbey, S.A., 1999, Taphonomy of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry in the Morrison Formation, central Utah—a lethal spring-fed pond, in Gillette, D.D., editor, Vertebrate paleon- tology in Utah: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publi- cation 99-1, p. 121–134. Breithaupt, B.H., Matthews, N.A., and Noble, T.A., 2004, An inte- grated approach to three-dimensional data collection at dino- saur tracksites in the Rocky Mountain West: Ichnos, v. 11, no. 1–2, p. 11–26. Brezinski, D.K., and Kollar, A.D., 2008, Geology of the Carnegie Museum dinosaur quarry site of Diplodocus carnegii, Sheep Creek, Wyoming: Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 77, no. 2, p. 243–252. Carpenter, K., 2010, Variation in a population of Theropoda (Di- nosauria)—Allosaurus from the Cleveland-Lloyd Quarry (Up- per Jurassic), Utah, USA: Paleontological Research, v. 14, no. 4, p. 250–259. Dodson, P., Behrensmeyer, A.K., Bakker, R.T., and McIntosh, S.J., 1980, Taphonomy and paleoecology of the dinosaur beds of the Jurassic Morrison Formation: Paleobiology, v. 6, p. 208– 232. Engelmann, G.F., Chure, D.J., and Fiorillo, A.R., 2004, The implica- tions of a dry climate for the paleoecology of the fauna of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: Sedimentary Geology, v. 167, p. 297–308. Falkingham, P.L., 2012, Acquisition of high-resolution three-di- mensional models using free, open-source, photogrammetric software: Palaeontologica Electronica, v. 15, no. 1, p. 1–15. Fiorillo, A.R., Padian, K., and Musikasinthorn, C., 2000, Taphon- omy and depositional setting of the Placerias Quarry (Chin- le Formation: Late Triassic, Arizona): Palaios, v. 15, no. 5, p. 373–386. Foster, J.R., and Hunt-Foster, R.K., 2011, New occurrences of dinosaur skin of two types (Sauropoda? and Dinosauria in- det.) from the Late Jurassic of North America (Mygatt-Moore Quarry, Morrison Formation): Journal of Vertebrate Paleon- tology, v. 31, no. 3, p. 717–721. Foster, J.R., and Peterson, J.E., 2016, First report of Apatosaurus (Diplodocidae: Apatosaurinae) from the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah—abundance, distribution, paleoecology, and taphon- omy of an endemic North American sauropod clade: Palae- oworld, v. 25, no. 3, p. 431–443. Foster, J.R., Hunt-Foster, R.K., Gorman M.A., II, Trujillo, K.C., Suarez, C.A., McHugh, J.B., Peterson, J.E., Warnock, J.P., and Schoenstein, H.E., 2018, Paleontology, taphonomy, and sed- imentology of the Mygatt-Moore Quarry, a large dinosaur bonebed in the Morrison Formation, western Colorado—im- plications for Upper Jurassic dinosaur preservation modes: Geology of the Intermountain West, v. 5, p. 23–93. Gates, T.A., 2005, The Late Jurassic Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry as a drought-induced assemblage: Palaios, v. 20, p. 363–375. Gilmore, C.W., 1920, Osteology of the carnivorous dinosauria in the United States National Museum, with special reference to the genera Antrodemus (Allosaurus) and Ceratosaurus: Bulle- tin of the United States National Museum, v. 110, p. 1–154. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D., 2001, PAST—Pale- ontological statistics software package for education and data analysis: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 4, no. 1, 9 p. Hanna, R.R., 2002, Multiple injury and infection in a sub-adult theropod dinosaur Allosaurus fragilis with comparisons to allosaur pathology in the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry collection: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 22, no. 1, p. 76–90. Hunt, A.P., Lucas, S.G., Krainer, C., and Spielmann, J., 2006, The ta- phonomy of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Ju- rassic Morrison Formation, Utah—a re-evaluation, in Foster, J.R., and Lucas, S.G., editors, Paleontology and geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36, p. 57–67. Ikejiri, T., Watkins, P., and Gray, D., 2006, Stratigraphy, sedimen- tology, and taphonomy of a sauropod quarry from the upper Morrison Formation of Thermopolis, central Wyoming, in Foster, J.R., and Lucas, S.G., editors, Paleontology and geol- ogy of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36, p. 39–46. Jennings, D.S., and Hasiotis, S.T., 2006, Taphonomic analysis of a dinosaur feeding site using geographic information systems (GIS), Morrison Formation, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyo- ming, USA: Palaios, v. 21, no. 5, p. 480–492. Keenan, S.W., and Scannella, J.B., 2014, Paleobiological implica- tions of a Triceratops bonebed from the Hell Creek Formation, Garfield County, northeastern Montana: Geological Society of America Special Paper 503, p. 349–364. Kirkland, J.I., Scheetz, R.D., and Foster, J.R., 2005, Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous dinosaur quarries of western Colorado and eastern Utah, in Rishard, G., compiler, Rocky Mountain Sec- tion of the Geological Society of America Field Trip Guide- book: Grand Junction Geological Society Field Trip 402, p. 1–26. 285 Close-Range Photogrammetry of the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, Emery County, Utah Warnock, J.P., Peterson, J.E., Clawson, S.R., Matthews, N.A., and Breithaupt, B.H. Geology of the Intermountain West 2018 Volume 5 Madsen, J.H., Jr., 1976, Allosaurus fragilis—a revised osteology: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 109, p. 1–163. Mallon, J.C., Henderson, D.M., McDonough, C.M., and Loughry, W.J., 2018, A “bloat-and-float” taphonomic model best ex- plains the upside-down preservation of ankylosaurs: Palae- ogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology, v. 497, p. 117–127. Matthews, N.A., 2008, Aerial and close-range photogrammetric technology—providing resource documentation, interpreta- tion, and preservation: Technical Note, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center, Denver, Colorado, v. 428, p. 1–42. Mathews, J.C., Brusatte, S.L., Williams, S.A., and Henderson, M.D., 2009, The first Triceratops bonebed and its implications for gregarious behavior: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 29, no. 1, p. 286–290. Matthews, N.A., Noble, T.A, and Breithaupt, B.H., 2016, Close- range photogrammetry for 3D ichnology—the basics of pho- togrammetric ichnology, in Falkingham, P.L., Marty, D. and Richter, A., editors, Dinosaur tracks—next steps: Blooming- ton, Indiana University Press, 520 p. Michelis, I., 2004, Taphonomie des Howe Quarry’s (Morrison-For- mation, Oberer Jura), Bighorn County, Wyoming, USA: Bonn, Germany, University of Bonn, Ph.D. dissertation, 82 p. Miller, W.E., Horrocks, R.D., and Madsen, J.H., Jr., 1996, The Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Emery County, Utah—a U.S. National Landmark (including history and quarry map): Brigham Young University Geology Studies, v. 41, p. 3–24. Peterson, J.E., Warnock, J.P., Eberhart, S.L., Clawson, S.R., and Noto, C.R., 2017, New data towards the development of a comprehensive taphonomic framework for the Late Jurassic Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, central Utah: PeerJ, doi: 10.7717/peerj.3368 Richmond, D.R., and Morris, R.K., 1996, The dinosaur death-trap of the Cleveland-Lloyd Quarry, Emery County, Utah, in Mor- alis, M., editor, The continental Jurassic: Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 60, p. 533–545. Rogers, R.R., and Kidwell, S.M., 2007, A conceptual framework for the genesis and analysis of vertebrate skeletal concentra- tions, in Rogers, R.R., Eberth, D.A., and Fiorillo, A.R., editors, Bonebeds—genesis, analysis, and paleobiological significance: Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press, p. 1–64. Syme, C.E., and Salisbury, S.W., 2014, Patterns of aquatic decay and disarticulation in juvenile Indo-Pacific crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus), and implications for the taphonomic interpretation of fossil crocodyliform material: Palaeogeography, Palaeocli- matology, Palaeoecology, v. 412, p. 108–123. Stokes, W.L., 1945, A new quarry for Jurassic dinosaurs: Science, v. 101, p. 115–117. Stokes, W.L., 1985, The Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry—win- dow to the past: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Government Printing Office, 61 p. Suarez, M.B., 2003, Analysis of freshwater limestones at the Cleve- land-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry, Emery County, Utah: San An- tonio, Texas, Trinity University Department of Geosciences, senior thesis, 63 p. Voorhies, M.R., 1969, Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska: Con- tributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, Special Paper v. 1, p. 1–69. Witkind, I.J., compiler, 1988, Geologic map of the Huntington 30' x 60' quadrangle, Carbon, Emery, Grand, and Uintah Counties, Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Se- ries Map I-1764, 1 plate, scale 1:100,000. 2 10 11 23 22 9 2839 20151 45 40 21 50 5 8 16 46 6 19 27 34 14 32 38 30 43 41 13 54 18 48 52 47 35 33 31 24 55 26 29 3 51 4 3742 44 7 17 25 12 3649 53 Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry South Butler Building Mapped features: Steven Clawson Photogrammetric image processing: Neffra Matthews Statistcs: Jonathan Warnock Concept design: Joseph Peterson Color Commentator: Brent Breithaupt ± 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 Feet 0 1 Meters A B C D Legend Atlas Caudal vert Centrum Cervical rib Dentary Femur Femur (L) Gastralia Humerus Illium Indet. Jacket Limb Meta Pelvic Quadrate Rib Scap Superior process Surangular Toe Trans process Vertebra Zygopophysis