Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association Volume 2 2015 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Kendall R. Grazul1, Jacqueline E. Huntoon2, and Jennifer M.K. O’Keefe3 1Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931; kgrazul@mtu.edu 2Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931; jeh@mtu.edu 3Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351; j.okeefe@moreheadstate.edu © 2015 Utah Geological Association. All rights reserved. For permission to copy and distribute, see the following page or visit the UGA website at www.utahgeology.org for information. Email inquiries to GIW@utahgeology.org. GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association Editors Douglas A. Sprinkel Utah Geological Survey 801.391.1977 GIW@utahgeology.org Bart J. Kowallis Brigham Young University 801.422.2467 bkowallis@gmail.com Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr. Utah Geological Survey 801.537.3364 tomchidsey@utah.gov Steven Schamel GeoX Consulting, Inc. 801.583-1146 geox-slc@comcast.net Production Cover Design and Desktop Publishing Douglas A. Sprinkel Cover Photograph The Palisade is a narrow ribbon-like mesa that rises abruptly from the surrounding area. A layer-cake succession of late Paleozoic to Jurassic-aged strata is exposed in the cliff faces that comprise the margins of The Palisade. Photograph by Kendall R. Grazul. i 2015 President April Abate aprilabate@utah.gov 801.538.5214 2015 President-Elect Jason Blake blake-j@comcast.net 435.658.3423 2015 Program Chair Mark Milligan markmilligan@utah.gov 801.537.3326 2015 Treasurer Rebekah Wood rwood@gmail.com 801.537.3378 2015 Secretary Jan Morse janmorse@utah.gov 801.538.5327 2015 Past-President Grant Willis grantwillis@utah.gov 801.537.3355 UGA Board UGA Committees Education/Scholarship Loren Morton lmorton@utah.gov 801.536.4262 Environmental Affairs Craig Eaton eaton@ihi-env.com 801.633.9396 Geologic Road Sign Terry Massoth twmassoth@hotmail.com 801.541.6258 Historian Paul Anderson paul@pbageo.com 801.364.6613 Membership Rick Ford rford@weber.edu 801.626.6942 Public Education Paul Jewell pwjewell@mines.utah.edu 801.581.6636 Sandy Eldredge sandyeldredge@utah.gov 801.537.3325 Publications Roger Bon rogerbon@xmission.com 801.942.0533 Publicity Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 Social/Recreation Roger Bon rogerbon@xmission.com 801.942.0533 AAPG House of Delegates 2014-2016 Term Tom Morris tom_morris@byu.edu 801.422.3761 State Mapping Advisory Committe UGA Representative Terry Massoth twmassoth@hotmail.com 801.422.3761 UGA Newsletter Newsletter Editor Bob Biek bobbiek@utah.gov 801.537.3356 UGA Website www.utahgeology.org Webmasters Paul Inkenbrandt paulinkenbrandt@utah.gov 801.537.3361 Lance Weaver lanceweaver@utah.gov 801.403.1636 Become a member of the UGA to help support the work of the Association and receive notices for monthly meetings, annual field conferences, and new publi- cations. Annual membership is $20 and annual student membership is only $5. Visit the UGA website at www.utahgeology.org for information and membership application. The UGA board is elected annually by a voting process through UGA Members. However, the UGA is a volunteer driven organization, and we welcome your voluntary service. If you would like to participate please contact the current president or committee member corresponding with the area in which you would like to volunteer. Utah Geological Association formed in 1970 from a merger of the Utah Geological Society, founded in 1946, and the Intermountain Association of Geologists, founded in 1949. Affiliated with the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Volume 2 2015 This is an open-access article in which the Utah Geological Association permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of text and figures that are not noted as copyrighted, provided the original author and source are credited. Earthquake Safety Committe Chair Grant Willis gwillis@utah.gov 801.537.3355 9 ABSTRACT Exposures of the late Paleozoic Cutler Formation, near the town of Gateway, Colorado, have tradition- ally been interpreted as the product of alluvial-fan deposition along the western flank of the Uncompahgre uplift and within the easternmost portion of the Paradox Basin. The Paradox Basin formed between the western margin of the Uncompahgre uplift, a segment of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains, and the west- ern paleoshoreline of the North American portion of Pangea. This part of Pangea is commonly thought to have experienced semi-arid to arid conditions and warm temperatures during the Pennsylvanian and Permian. We present stratigraphic and fossil plant evidence in this paper to support prior interpretations that the Cutler near Gateway, Colorado, was deposited by alluvial fans that hosted localized wetland areas. Our findings are consistent with the results of prior studies that have suggested the climate in the area was warm, semi-arid, and ice-free at the time the plants described in this paper were living. Plant fossils collected from the Cutler Formation came from two sites in The Palisade Wilderness Study Area (managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management) of western Colora- do. The stratigraphic sections at the sites were composed mostly of pebble to cobble conglomerate and sandstone, but the fossil plants were mainly preserved in fine-grained intervals (fine-grained sandstone to siltstone). The preservation of plant fossils in the proximal Cutler Formation is remarkable because the surrounding sections consist mostly of conglomerate and sandstone interpreted as fluvial and debris-flow deposits. The fine-grained strata containing the plant horizons must have been deposited in a wet and pro- tected setting, possibly a spring-fed abandoned channel on the alluvial fan. The plants and their surround- ing sediment must have been rapidly buried in order to allow for long-term preservation of the fossils. It seems likely that vegetation was abundant in and adjacent to low-lying wet areas on the fan’s surface, based on the abundance of plant fossils found at the two sites. The fossil plant assemblage includes Calamites, Walchia, and Pecopteris. The flora are interpreted to have lived near the apex of the alluvial-fan system. These fossils suggest that warm and at least seasonally and locally wet conditions existed in the area during the time that the plants were growing. More arid conditions during the late Paleozoic are suggested by the characteristics of some of the time-equivalent and near time-equivalent rocks exposed to the west of the study area in the central Paradox Basin. Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Kendall R. Grazul1, Jacqueline E. Huntoon2, and Jennifer M.K. O’Keefe3 1Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931; kgrazul@mtu.edu 2Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931; jeh@mtu.edu 3Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351; j.okeefe@moreheadstate.edu Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K., 2015, Stratigraphy and fossil plants from the Cutler Formation (late Paleozoic) and their paleoclimatic implications, eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado: Geology of the Intermountain West, v. 2, p. 9-27. © 2015 Utah Geological Association. All rights reserved. For permission to use, copy, or distribute see the preceeding page or the UGA website, www.utahgeology.org, for information. Email inquiries to GIW@utahgeology.org. GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association Volume 2 2015 10 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 INTRODUCTION This study focuses on the stratigraphy and paleobot- any of a portion of the Cutler Formation (late Paleozo- ic) and their paleoclimatic implications for an area lo- cated near the modern-day town of Gateway, Colorado. For this study, samples were collected from sites locat- ed within The Palisade Wilderness Study Area (WSA) / Outstanding Natural Area (ONA) / Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), which is managed by the Grand Junction Field Office of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. The Palisade WSA is located in western Colorado, approximately 30 miles southwest of Grand Junction (figure 1). The Pal- isade WSA is named for a towering, ribbon-like mesa known as The Palisade. In contrast to the The Palisade itself, the majority of The Palisade WSA consists of relatively subdued topog- raphy formed on the Cutler Formation. The Cutler was deposited along the western flank of the Uncompahgre uplift, a segment of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains, within the easternmost part of the Paradox Basin during the Pennsylvanian and Permian (Baker and Reeside, 1929; Turnbow, 1955). Exposures of the Cutler in The Palisade WSA include some of the most proximal de- posits contained within the formation (Mack and Ras- mussen, 1984). Canyons and gullies carved by modern ephemeral streams provide outstanding three-dimen- sional exposures, making the area an ideal location for study of the proximal Cutler Formation. Exposures of the Cutler Formation near Gateway have traditionally been interpreted as the products of deposition in an alluvial fan (Walker, 1967; Werner, 1974; Campbell, 1979; Mack and Rasmussen, 1984; Campbell, 2003). The Cutler near Gateway is common- ly referred to as “the Gateway Fan.” Despite the conven- tional thought regarding the formation’s depositional environment, attempts to characterize the climate at the time of deposition have resulted in considerable debate. Evidence has been presented to support interpreted climate conditions ranging from ever-wet (Campbell, 1979), through seasonally wet and semi-arid to sub-hu- mid (Mack and Rasmussen, 1984; Campbell, 2003), to semi-arid to arid (Walker, 1967; Werner, 1974). Interpretations of semi-arid to arid conditions during the late Paleozoic are supported by the presence of halite, anhydrite, and gypsum in the Paradox For- mation, which was deposited in the central portion of the Paradox Basin during the Pennsylvanian (Hite and Buckner, 1981). The Paradox Formation may be, in part, a lateral equivalent to the oldest parts of the Cutler Formation (Condon, 1997). Younger lateral equivalents in the central and western Paradox Basin region include Permian sandstones deposited in eolian environments (e.g., Cedar Mesa and White Rim Sandstones). These eolian sandstones, like the Paradox Formation, indicate arid conditions were dominant in the central Paradox Basin for extended periods during the time of depo- sition of the Cutler Formation (Nuccio and Condon, 1996). In contrast to the traditional understanding of the Cutler Formation as the product of alluvial-fan depo- sition, Soreghan and others (2009) interpreted the Cut- ler in The Palisade WSA as a low-latitude, proglacial, fluvial-lacustrine deposit. This hypothesis suggested that tropical glaciers existed at low elevations and low latitudes in western Pangea during the late Paleozoic. More recently however, an analysis of plant fossils col- lected from the proximal Cutler Formation (Huntoon and others, 2014) led to the conclusion that interpre- tations of an alluvial fan origin for the formation near Gateway are justified. Figure 1. Location of The Palisade WSA in western Colorado. Colorado River, Dolores River, and Unaweep Canyon all shown on map. Inset map shows location of main map area in Utah and Colorado. 11 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 In addition to Huntoon and others (2014), other studies have investigated plant fossils and palynomorphs obtained from the proximal Cutler Formation (e.g., Werner, 1974; Mack and Rasmussen, 1984; Soreghan and others, 2007). The results of previous analyses pro- vide a rich source of data that can be used to constrain interpretations regarding environmental conditions in the local area at the time of deposition of the Cutler. The additional plant fossils described in this paper sup- port the interpretation of the Cutler as an alluvial-fan deposit. The plants and lithofacies also suggest that the climate in The Palisade WSA during the late Paleozoic was warm and that water was locally present on the up- per reaches of the alluvial fan at the time of deposition. It seems that there must have been abundant vegetation in and adjacent to low-lying wet areas at the time the Cutler Formation was deposited based on the amount of fossilized plant material found. GEOLOGIC SETTING During the late Paleozoic, the area that now makes up The Palisade WSA was located near the western margin of proto-North America at near-equatorial pa- leolatitudes (figure 2). The Palisade WSA was at that time bounded on the east by the southwestern faulted margin of the Uncompahgre uplift. This uplift was the westernmost outlier of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains. Segments of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains extended across late Paleozoic North America (Ye and others, 1996). The Uncompahgre highlands rose and continuously eroded during the late Paleozoic. They contributed sediments that were deposited in and adjacent to the Paradox Basin, which was located to the west of the uplift. The Cutler Formation in The Palisade WSA consists of mostly coarse-grained sediment eroded from the Uncompahgre uplift (Werner, 1974) and deposited directly adjacent to its western margin in the easternmost part of the Paradox Basin. The Cutler reaches a maximum thickness of approximately 5 kilometers (Barbeau, 2003) proximal and medial to the Uncompahgre highland; The Palisade WSA is located along the flank of the uplift. The formation thins to about 500 meters (Barbeau, 2003) to the west and southwest across the Paradox Basin and undergoes lithofacies changes so that it is referred to as the Cutler Group (Condon, 1997) in the western part of the Paradox Basin. The lowermost part of the Cutler Formation and Group in areas more distal to the Uncompahgre uplift record cycles of marine flooding and evaporation in the Paradox Bain that resulted from long-term cycles of sea-level change during the late Paleozoic (Rankey, 1997). Reconstructions of the original thickness of the Cutler Formation, as well as precise determination of its current thickness in different areas, are subjects of much debate. Deformation of the Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation that occurred during deposition of the Cutler Formation resulted in the development of numerous salt-related structures (e.g., mini-basins, salt- walls) in the subsurface of the Paradox Basin (Trudgill, 2011). These features influenced deposition of the Cutler Formation and its lateral equivalents, including Figure 2. Simplified geologic map of the study area (modified from Huntoon and others, 2014). Geology modified from Ca- ter (1955): PЄ = Precambrian rocks (dark gray); Pz = Paleo- zoic Cutler Formation (medium gray); Mz = Mesozoic strata (light gray); Q = Quaternary alluvium (white). Locations of fossil plant sites are indicated with the red box. Latitude and longitude shown for the northwest, northeast, and southwest corners of the map. (Inset A) Location of study area and late Paleozoic paleoequator (calculated by Smirnov, Michigan Technological University, personal communication, 2011). (Inset B) Location of study area; small rectangle enclosing Gateway is shown expanded as the main map in this figure. 12 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 the Cutler Group (Trudgill, 2011). The proximal portions of the Cutler Formation are currently exposed near Gateway due in part to Lara- mide uplift (White and Jacobsen, 1983; Bump and Da- vis, 2003) that resulted in reactivation of one or more Paleozoic faults and development of additional faults along the southwest margin of the modern Uncompah- gre Plateau (White and Jacobsen, 1983; Mankowski, 2003). Cenozoic uplift of the Colorado Plateau (Saha- gian and others, 2002) and subsequent incision by the Colorado River and its tributaries produced the expo- sures examined in this study. In The Palisade WSA, the Cutler Formation typical- ly consists of pastel-colored (reddish, pinkish, purplish, and light grayish hues) proximal clastic rocks that are dominated by conglomerate and sandstone (Huntoon and others, 2014). Quartz and feldspar are the most abundant minerals within the Cutler, although biotite, hematite, epidote, muscovite, and opaque minerals are also common (Campbell, 2003). Although coarse sand- stone and conglomerate beds are common in the Cutler Formation in the study area, the fossils described in this paper were primarily collected from fine-grained beds. The proximal Cutler Formation was vegetated during the late Paleozoic. Recently, Huntoon and oth- ers (2014) described plants fossils from the Cutler, in- cluding Pecopteris, Calamites, Archaeocalamites, and Neuropteris. All of these plants are thought to have lived in environments with a high water table for a large portion of the year (Tidwell, 1998). Additionally, Mack and Rasmussen (1984) documented the presence of rhizocretions in the proximal Cutler Formation and Soreghan and others (2007) identified late Paleozoic palynomorphs (Densosporites, Lycospora, Vesicaspora, and Florinites) in samples they collected in and near The Palisade WSA. METHODS The goal of this study was to document and describe plant fossils and fossil-bearing strata in the Cutler For- mation within The Palisade WSA. In order to achieve this goal, fieldwork was conducted in the summer of 2014. Field investigations focused on two areas located to the west of the mouth of Unaweep Canyon, to the north of West Creek and to the south and east of the topographic promontory known as The Palisade (see figure 3 and cover photograph). The area was mapped and samples were collected and transported to Michi- gan Technological University for further analysis. The field study covered areas located on the Gate- way and Two V Basin U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-min- ute topographic quadrangle maps. Locations were de- termined using hand-held Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) units and the 1:24,000-scale topographic maps (Gateway and Two V Basin). Draws, side can- yons, and ridges were explored in search of plant fossils. At the same time, the contact between the Cutler For- mation and the Precambrian rocks that formed the core of the Uncompahgre uplift was traced and mapped. When fossil-bearing rocks were encountered, their lo- cations were indicated on the field map. The occurrenc- es of rocks with a lithology similar to the fossil-bearing strata were also mapped. Fossil plants and plant fragments were collected Figure 3. Aerial view of a portion of the study area. Approxi- mate location of sample collection sites labeled. More precise location information withheld in compliance with Bureau of Land Management permitting requirements. Faulted contact between Precambrian granite and gneiss (labeled PЄ) and late Paleozoic sedimentary Cutler Formation (labeled lPPc) shown with dotted line. Locations of plant fossil localities are out- lined with red boxes and are situated adjacent to the contact. Locations of sites containing relatively fine-grained material, similar in lithology to the fossil-bearing layers, are shown with black filled circles. Image from Google Earth and U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture Farm Service Agency. 13 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 from two sites; USNM 43857 (site 1) and USNM 43856 (site 2). It is important to note that these sites are sub- divisions of a prior collection site (USNM 43705) de- scribed in Huntoon and others (2014). The fossils were photographed in place, collected, and transported from the field for detailed description and identification in the laboratory. Measured sections were prepared for the two fossil-bearing sites. Hand samples were col- lected from the two fossil-bearing sites and from one non-productive site (USNM 43858, site 3) that was sim- ilar in lithology to the fossil-bearing rock. These hand samples were later processed in the laboratory in an at- tempt to retrieve late Paleozoic palynomorphs. Despite careful searching, no other plant fossil lo- calities were identified. Although lithofacies similar in color and grain size to the fossil-bearing units were encountered at several other sites, material exposed at the surface at the majority of those other sites was too unconsolidated to allow for successful collection of plant material, even if it was present. Extensive excava- tions were not undertaken however, so it is possible that better lithified material is present below the surface at some of those sites. In the laboratory, the samples containing plant fos- sils were organized by type, renumbered, and re-pho- tographed. Each fossil was described, and fine details were examined and sketched. Photographs and sketch- es were used to compare to plant fossils described in the literature in order to identify each specimen. All of the fossils are now housed in the type/illustrated collections of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithso- nian Institution, Washington, D.C. Hand samples were taken to Morehead State Uni- versity for palynological processing and analysis. The hand samples were crushed to pass through a 1-mm mesh sieve, and 2 gram sub-samples were split from each crushed hand sample using a microriffler. The ma- terial was demineralized and deflocculated in prepara- tion for the extraction of organic material. The O’Keefe Method was used to process the samples (O’Keefe and others, 2011; O’Keefe and Eble, 2012). Permanent slides were prepared and inventoried for palynomorphs. Un- fortunately, no identifiable late Paleozoic palynomorphs were obtained. DESCRIPTION OF PLANT FOSSIL SITES The plant fossils were described and collected from two sites (figure 3) located near the faulted contact be- tween the Cutler Formation and the Precambrian gran- ite and gneiss that formed the core of the Uncompahgre uplift of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains (figure 4). In the vicinity of the plant fossil sites, the Cutler Formation is cut by reverse faults (possibly reactivated during the Laramide orogeny) that place Precambrian rock above the Cutler Formation and older Cutler on top of young- er Cutler (Mankowski, 2003). These structural compli- cations make it difficult to trace individual stratigraphic horizons across the study area. The intervals containing the plant fossils at the two sites are 2 to 3 meters thick, a small fraction of the total modern-day thickness of the Cutler Formation near Gateway, which has been esti- mated at 150 to 300 meters (Condon, 1997). Below is a detailed description of the fossil-plant horizons and the fossil plants collected at each site. Figure 4. Faulted contact between late Paleozoic Cutler Formation (left of hammer) and Precambrian granite (right of hammer). The Precambrian granite is up on the east-northeast relative to the Cutler Formation on the west-southwest. View is to the northwest. Fault trace strikes N. 20° W., and dips 60° NE. Both plant fossil sites are located near the faulted contact between the Cutler Formation and the Precambrian rocks. 14 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 Site 1 Stratigraphic Description The fossil-plant horizon at site 1 (USNM 43857) is at the top of an approximately 3-meter thick section that consists of three units (figures 5 and 6). Unit 1, the lowest unit in the measured section, is a dark gray, poorly sorted, matrix-supported boulder conglomerate (figure 5). It contains subangular to subrounded ran- domly oriented clasts composed of granite and gneiss. The lower unit also contains approximately 50% clasts with a maximum size of 35 centimeters and an average size of 5 centimeters. The matrix is very coarse to fine- grained sandstone consisting of angular to subangular grains of quartz and feldspar. The base is not exposed. Unit 1 is interpreted as a debris-flow deposit. Unit 2 is an olive-black, poorly sorted, sandy, peb- ble to cobble conglomerate with angular clasts of feld- spar and quartz. It contains approximately 40% clasts with a maximum size of 4 centimeters and an average size of 0.5 centimeters. The matrix is mudstone to very coarse sandstone. This unit contains alternating layers of coarse- and fine-grained strata interrupted by scat- tered lenses of sandstone and sandy siltstone on the or- der of 1 to 5 centimeters thick. Unit 2 is interpreted as the product of fluvial deposition. Unit 3 contains the fossil-bearing horizon. It has a maximum thickness of 10 centimeters and consists of moderate yellowish-brown, thinly laminated, micace- ous siltstone to fine-grained sandstone. This unit is in- terpreted as the product of deposition under slack-wa- ter conditions in a fluvial system due to the abundance of fine-grained material, including flakes of mica. Fossil Content Four distinct specimens of identifiable plant fossils were collected from site 1. The first group of identifi- able specimens are all members of the genus Calamites. Many small and incomplete calamitean fragments were found at this location. The best preserved specimen (fig- ure 7) is 13.5 centimeters long and 3 centimeters wide. This sample appears to be an incomplete external stem cast (DiMichele and Falcon-Lang, 2012). The external surface of the cast is longitudinally ribbed with grooved indentations. The ribs are 0.1 centimeters wide. There are three nodes visible on the specimen and the ribs al- ternate at the nodes, as is typical of Calamites (Tidwell, 1998). The fossil is light brown in color and is present in a moderate yellowish-brown siltstone. The second specimen collected is Walchia. It is 2.6 centimeters long and 0.3 to 0.5 centimeters wide (figure 8). The scale-like leaves are oval and come to a point where they join the stem. Each leaf is approximately 0.2 centimeters long and 0.1 centimeters wide and is orient- ed at an acute angle to the center stem. Walchia is char- acterized by narrow branches with small, upright leaves that taper to a point (Arnold, 1941), as is evident in this specimen. No veins are visible on the impressions of individual leaves. The specimen is moderate yellow- ish-brown and is present in a pale yellowish-brown silt- stone. The third specimen collected is a Pecopteris fossil (figure 9). It has a rachis that is 15 centimeters long, 0.3 centimeters wide, and is straight and heavy as is common for Pecopteris (Wittry, 2006). The pinnae alternate along the stem. Some impressions of the pinnae are very faint, but those that are recognizable measure between 5 and 6 centimeters long and 0.5 to 1 centimeter wide. The pinnae come to a point at their Figure 5. Measured section of site 1. Plant fossil horizon is in fine-grained strata of unit 3. See main text for description. 15 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 distal ends. As is typical of Pecopteris, the pinnae consist of small pinnules with a broad basal attachment to the costa and slight confluence between adjacent pinnules (DiMichele and others, 2010). The stem is moderate brown. Both the fronds and surrounding siltstone are moderate yellowish-brown in color. Figure 6. Photographs of site 1 (Jacob’s staff marked in 10 centimeter increments). (A) Surface view of top of fossil-bearing unit 3 as it is exposed along the crest of a ridge. (B) Conglomerate and sandstone beds typical of unit 2. (C) Conglomeratic beds of unit 1 near base of the measured section. 16 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 The last identifiable specimen found at site 1 is an- other Pecopteris specimen (figure 10). The specimen is 5 centimeters long and 3 centimeters wide at the base. The pinnules, which are about 0.4 centimeters wide, get progressively smaller away from the base of the pinna. Pecopteris tends to have alternate, closely spaced, and straight-sided pinnules (Wittry, 2006). Each pinnule is rounded and has a well-defined rib in the center. The pinnules have flat bases where attached to the stem. The pecopterid is moderate yellowish-brown in a pale yel- lowish-brown siltstone. Site 2 Stratigraphic Description Site 2 (USNM 43856) is located very close to, but stratigraphically below, site 1 in the Cutler Formation and within 100 meters of the faulted contact with Pre- cambrian rocks of the Uncompahgre uplift (figures 3 and 4). The section at site 2 is approximately 2 meters thick and consists of three units (figures 11 through 13). The basal unit 1 and the capping unit 3 are very simi- lar to unit 2 described at site 1. Units 1 and 3 at site 2 are interpreted as the product of fluvial deposition. The middle unit at site 2, which contains the majority of the plant fossils, is approximately 70 centimeters thick and consists of interbedded coarse- and fine-grained stra- ta. The coarse-grained strata of unit 2 are medium- to very coarse grained, reddish-orange sandstone less than 5 centimeters in thickness. The relatively fine-grained Figure 7. Specimen of Calamites (specimen dimensions = 13.5 cm x 3 cm) at site 1 (USNM 43857). USNM Specimen 611005. Figure 8. Specimen of Walchia (specimen dimensions = 2.6 cm x 0.4 cm) at site 1 (USNM 43857). USNM Specimen 611006. Figure 9. Specimen of Pecopteris (specimen dimensions = 15 cm x 8 cm) at site 1 (USNM 43857). USNM Specimen 611007. Figure 10. Specimen of Pecopteris (specimen dimensions = 5 cm x 3 cm) at site 1 (USNM 43857). USNM Specimen 611008. 17 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 strata consist of thinly laminated light olive-gray, very fine grained sandstone to micaceous sandy siltstone. Unit 2 at site 2 has a scoured basal boundary and fines upward overall. The best preserved plant fossils at site 2 were found within the fine-grained strata of unit 2, although the coarser strata within unit 2 also contained fossil fragments. Some of the thinly laminated mica- ceous beds within unit 2 show small-scale wavy defor- mation that is possibly due to compression. Unit 2 is interpreted as the product of deposition under stand- ing-water conditions in a fluvial system. Unit 3 at site 2 also contained some plant material including a cala- mitean fragment that appears to have been preserved in place in an upright orientation (figure 13). Fossil Content Four identifiable plant fossils were collected from site 2. The first Pecopteris specimen (figure 14) collected at site 2 is 3.5 centimeters in length and 4.5 centimeters at its widest point. A partial stem is visible with frag- ments of pinnae attached in a v-shaped pattern. The pinnae are alternately arranged and 2.2 to 3 centimeters Figure 11. Measured section of site 2. Fine-grained strata of unit 2 contain the majority of the plant fossils at site 2. See main text for description. Figure 12. Photographs of measured section at site 2 (Jacob’s staff marked in 10 centimeter increments). (A) View of full mea- sured section. The location of the contact between units 1 and 2 is obscured by float in the photo; the approximate position of the contact is as shown. Location of a scoured channel within unit 3 is shown in red near the top of the measured section and outcrop. (B) Close-up view of unit 2 and base of unit 3 at site 2. 18 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 long and 0.1 to 0.5 centimeters wide. Pinnae become thinner away from the site of attachment to the stem and come to a point at the distal tips. Similar to the Pecopteris specimen from site 1, there are small pinnules with a broad basal attachment to the costa and slight confluence between adjacent pinnules (DiMichele and others, 2010). The specimen is olive-gray within a dark greenish-gray micaceous siltstone. A second Pecopteris specimen (figure 15) was col- lected from site 2. It is 3 centimeters long and 1 cen- timeter wide. The pinnules in this specimen are 0.5 centimeters long, 0.4 centimeters wide, rounded, and adhered to the stem along the entire base. The pinnules are alternately arranged, closely spaced, and generally attached nearly perpendicular to the mid-rib (Wittry, 2006). Sparse venation is present and appears to be widely forked and one-time divided, as is characteristic of pecopterids (W.A. DiMichele, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, personal communication, 2015). The fossil is grayish brown within a moderate yellow- ish-brown siltstone. Site 2 also yielded Walchia specimens. The best pre- served Walchia fossil (figure 16) from site 2 is 2.8 cen- timeters long and 0.3 centimeters wide. The specimen is characterized by narrow branches with small, upright leaves that taper to a point (Arnold, 1941). The leaves are seed shaped and also come to a point where they are attached to the stem. Each leaf is 0.3 centimeters long and the average width is on the order of 0.1 centimeters. The fossil is brownish-gray within a dark greenish-gray micaceous siltstone. A small fossil calamitean cone (figure 17), possibly Figure 13. Calamitean fragment in place in unit 3 at site 2. (A) Outcrop-scale view of part of the measured section with person pointing to calamitean fragment. (B) Close-up view of calamitean fragment. 19 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 from the genus Palaeostachya, is 1.8 centimeters long and 0.4 centimeters wide. The different kinds of cal- amitean cones cannot always be recognized without clear preservation of the spore-bearing organs (Arnold, 1958). These organs are not distinguishable in this specimen. The cone is incomplete because the base and stem are not preserved. The central axis has regularly spaced discs with whorls of bracts extending from the sides (Arnold, 1958). The fossil is preserved as an ol- ive-gray impression in a dark greenish-gray micaceous siltstone. Site 3 Site 3 (figure 18, USNM 43858) contained no plant fossils, but was sampled for pollen, spores, and other organic material. Site 3 is a massive to cross-stratified, grayish-purple pebble conglomerate that contains lens- es of micaceous, platy siltstone. Siltstone lenses aver- age 3 centimeters thick with the largest lens reaching 5 centimeters in thickness. We sampled a lens that extended for several meters horizontally. The unit as a whole is exposed for several tens of meters along the west side of Bull Draw (figure 3). The coarse- grained components of the unit contained angular clasts, averaging 1 centimeter in diameter, of feldspar and granite supported by matrix consisting of silt- to clay-sized particles. The fine-grained (siltstone) lens- es at site 3 are similar to the fossil-bearing horizons at sites 1 and 2 in terms of grain size and platy texture, but contained lesser amounts of mica. Organic material ob- tained from the sample collected at site 3 contained only modern palynomorphs and charcoal. The cross-strati- fied conglomerate at site 3 reflects deposition by fluvial processes. The lenses of micaceous, platy siltstone were deposited under low-flow or standing-water conditions. Figure 14. Specimen of Pecopteris (specimen dimensions = 3.5 cm x 4 cm) at site 2 (USNM 43856). USNM Specimen 611009. Figure 15. Specimen of Pecopteris (specimen dimensions = 3 cm x 1 cm) at site 2 (USNM 43856). USNM Specimen 611010. 20 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 DISCUSSION The stratigraphic successions at the three sites de- scribed for this study included pebble conglomerate that was deposited by fluvial processes. All three sites contained evidence of variations in depositional ener- gy through time. At sites 1 and 2, fluctuations in flow strength were indicated by the presence of alternating layers of relatively coarse and fine material. The fin- est layers at all three sites consisted of platy, micaceous fine-grained sandstone to siltstone that was deposited under standing-water or low-flow conditions. Only site 1 included matrix-supported boulder conglomer- ate containing subrounded randomly oriented clasts up to 35 centimeters in diameter that is interpreted as a debris-flow deposit. In aggregate, the stratigraph- Figure 16. Specimen of Walchia (specimen dimensions = 2.8 cm x 0.3 cm) at site 2 (USNM 43856). USNM Specimen 611011. Figure 17. Specimen of a calamitean cone (specimen dimen- sions = 1.8 cm x 0.4 cm) at site 2 (USNM 43856). USNM Spec- imen 611012. 21 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 ic successions at the three sites reflect subaerial depo- sition in an environment that experienced variability in discharge and sediment supply through time. The coarsest materials, within the debris-flow deposits, re- quired substantial energy for transport (and probably steep slopes) whereas the finest materials would have only been deposited and preserved in protected settings under low-energy flow conditions. Taken together, the lithologic characteristics doc- umented at the three sites suggest that deposition oc- curred near the apex of an alluvial fan (Huntoon and others, 2014). Debris flows would have been active during high-discharge events that flushed accumulated debris from the Uncompahgre highland toward the west where it could be deposited in the easternmost part of the Paradox Basin. Although fluvial deposition was the dominant depositional process at each of the three sites, moderate to high energy down-fan flows were tempo- rarily interrupted at each site for an extended period of time. The interruption of down-fan fluvial transport probably resulted from channel abandonment. Large floods in arid and semi-arid climates can cause avulsion of the main fan channel, shifting the locus of deposition to previously inactive parts of the fan (Chawner, 1935). Abandoned or blocked fluvial channels are generally recognized as good sites for the potential preservation of plant material in continental environments (Gast- aldo and Demko, 2011). If the downstream end of an abandoned channel is blocked by vegetation or debris, the abandoned channel may experience standing-water conditions. The occurrence of low-flow or standing-wa- ter conditions in small, localized sites during deposition of the Cutler Formation is suggested by the presence of the fine-grained layers, including micaceous siltstone, at each of the three sites. Extremely small shear stresses are required to move platy mica grains and these grains would have been transported far downstream by flows of any appreciable strength. Deposition of micaceous siltstone must have occurred in protected areas under standing-water or very low-energy flow conditions. Al- though ultimately short-lived, the protected, quiet-wa- ter sites existed for a sufficient amount time for fine- grained sediment and plant material to be deposited. Overall, the characteristics of the strata at sites 1 and 2 (including debris-flow, fluvial, and slack-water depos- its) indicate that the area was at least seasonally and lo- cally wet during deposition of the fossil-bearing strata. Preservation of both the fine-grained sediment and the fossil plants required rapid burial and subsid- ence. Rapid burial was required to protect the fine- grained sediment and plant material from post-dep- ositional erosion. Subsidence was required to ensure that the plant material was maintained at depths below the water table so that it could be preserved (Gastaldo and Demko, 2011). Unusual conditions were required for both the deposition and preservation of the fine- grained plant-bearing layers as well as the plant fossils themselves. Although many protected, vegetated wet- land sites may have existed at the time of deposition of the proximal Cutler Formation, micaceous siltstone layers are now uncommon. This is not surprising, giv- en that the majority of the Cutler in The Palisade WSA was deposited under conditions that would have easily transported silt and sand-sized materials downstream. Where present, the majority of the remaining preserved occurrences of micaceous siltstone in the Cutler For- mation in the study area are devoid of even small frag- Figure 18. Photograph of site 3 (Jacob’s staff marked in 10 cen- timeter increments) showing the sampled dark-gray micace- ous siltstone. Surrounding material, and the majority of the outcrop consists of grayish-purple pebble conglomerate. 22 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 ments of plant material. Again, this is not unexpected because fragile plant material would not have survived any appreciable downstream transport, and would have been rapidly degraded if it remained at or near the sur- face for any length of time. The fossil flora found near Gateway are a mixture of species typical of seasonally dry environments as well as wetland settings. Most of the plant fossils collected from the Cutler Formation are, however, known to have inhabited environments dominated by wet conditions (Tidwell, 1998). For example, Calamites has been found in both coal swamps and flood basins (Gastaldo, 1986, 1987), and is tolerant of excessive flooding and sedi- ment burial (Gastaldo and others, 1995; DiMichele and others, 2001). Pecopteris has been found in Carbonifer- ous coal swamps, but is also known from relatively dry Permian environments (DiMichele and others, 2001). Although most of the plants are interpreted to have lived in a wide variety of wetland settings, walchian co- nifers were stress-tolerant plants that lived in relatively dry habitats (Rothwell and others, 1997). Coniferous genera such as Walchia have long been considered a common constituent of the Permian flora, but Walchia also occurs in association with typical Pennsylvanian genera (Arnold, 1941). The appearance of Walchia in the mid-continent region is thought to reflect increas- ing aridity (Arnold, 1941). The presence of Walchia in the Cutler Formation may be a good indication of the regional or background climate in the area at the time of deposition. Arid to semi-arid climate conditions in upland settings would have confined the wetland spe- cies described above to parts of the landscape with high water tables (DiMichele and others, 2014). Whereas the wet-tolerant plants may have grown in low-lying and wet abandoned channels, the Walchia probably grew in drier settings surrounding the geographically isolated wetlands. The wet areas were more favorable for fos- sil preservation than the drier areas, potentially making the wetland plants appear more abundant than they ac- tually were (DiMichele and others, 2014). Preliminary analysis of the paleomagnetic signature of the rocks in the collection area suggested that the Cutler Formation near sites 1 and 2 was deposited near the equator during the late Pennsylvanian (Mankowski, 2003). A late Pennsylvanian age was also suggested by the presence of Archaeocalamites in the proximal Cut- ler Formation (Huntoon and others, 2014). Archaeo- calamites was more common during the Pennsylvanian but tended to be increasingly rare in the Permian (Ma- may and Bateman, 1991; W.A. DiMichele, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, personal communication, 2015). Therefore, a late Pennsylvanian age for the de- posits at sites 1 and 2 seems likely but is not fully con- firmed. Intraformational faults (Mankowski, 2003) in the Cutler Formation in the The Palisade WSA place relatively older Cutler above relatively younger Cutler, making stratigraphic relations difficult to determine with certainty. Nevertheless, it seems likely that al- though the fossil-bearing rocks are now exposed at the surface, they are part of the older portions of the Cut- ler Formation. The fossil-bearing rocks are almost cer- tainly older than the Cutler Formation strata exposed around the Gateway town site, where they are likely Permian in age and are unconformably overlain by the Triassic Moenkopi Formation. Whether the deposits at sites 1 and 2 are late Penn- sylvanian or Permian in age, deposition occurred at near-equatorial paleolatitudes (Blakey and Ranney, 2008). Warm temperatures and humid conditions at the time of deposition might be expected for such a lo- cation, particularly a site along the margin of a highland such as the Uncompahgre uplift. Pennsylvanian evapo- rites and Permian eolian rocks deposited in the central Paradox Basin to the west of The Palisade WSA indicate that extended episodes of aridity affected western equa- torial Pangea however. Despite the common interpre- tation that warm and wet conditions persisted across large portions of midcontinent North America during the Pennsylvanian (Scotese and McKerrow, 1990), the western equatorial margin of Pangea appears to have experienced warm and dry conditions, at least inter- mittently, throughout the late Paleozoic. The fossils and their encasing strata appear to indicate climate condi- tions more similar to those experienced in the central Paradox Basin than in the midcontinent. A semi-arid background climate with seasonally concentrated pre- cipitation is inferred based on the lithologic charac- teristics and fossil content at sites 1 and 2. Semi-arid 23 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 conditions would have allowed for the establishment of Walchia. Seasonally concentrated precipitation would have produced the debris flow and fluvial deposits doc- umented at the two sites. Wetter conditions in aban- doned channels would have provided ideal conditions for the growth of wet-tolerant plants such as Calamites and Pecopteris. It must be noted that the two sites de- scribed in this study represent only a small part of the total time interval represented by the Cutler Formation and that the climate in the region experienced substan- tial variability at multiple temporal scales during the late Paleozoic (Langford and Chan, 1988; Dubiel and others, 1996; Rankey, 1997; Stanesco and others, 2000; Mountney, 2006; Cain and Mountney, 2009; Jordan and Mountney, 2010, 2012; Huntoon and others, 2014). Huntoon and others (2014) proposed a detailed model for the deposition of the proximal Cutler Forma- tion and associated formations deposited in the central Paradox Basin. In their model, climate and sea-level change are the primary processes controlling deposi- tion. During the late Paleozoic, sediment was eroded from the Uncompahgre uplift and deposited along the margins of the adjacent Paradox Basin. Subsidence of the Paradox Basin foreland was an ongoing process re- sulting from faulting along the western margin of the Uncompahgre uplift and compaction of previously de- posited sediment (Huntoon and others, 2014). Depo- sition in the rapidly subsiding basin would have been conducive to fossil preservation even under seasonal semi-arid conditions (Looy and others, 2014). As stat- ed earlier, rapid subsidence would have kept the fos- sil-bearing strata at depths below the water table, as is required for the preservation of plant material (Gastal- do and Demko, 2011). It is notable that both of the fossil-bearing sites were located directly to the west of a faulted contact between the Cutler Formation and the Precambrian rocks of the Uncompahgre uplift (figure 3). It is possible that the proximity of the fault to the fossil-bearing horizons was important in the preservation of the plant material. If the fault was active at the time the fossil-bearing layers were deposited, freshwater springs may have reached the surface along the fault providing an abundant source of water for any plants living nearby in abandoned chan- nels. Upon burial, proximity to the fault may have re- sulted in preferential cementation of the Cutler adjacent to the contact. CONCLUSIONS The observations made of the Cutler Formation in The Palisade WSA near Gateway (Colorado) indicate that the rocks were deposited in a proximal alluvial-fan environment. The fossils preserved at two sites in the proximal Cutler are probably late Pennsylvanian in age. They suggest deposition occurred under warm and lo- cally wet conditions under a semi-arid background cli- mate. Although most of the plants collected at the two sites are known from wet environments, the presence of Walchia indicates drier conditions. The inference that warm temperatures and dry conditions were experi- enced in the Paradox Basin region during deposition of the Cutler Formation is consistent with the occurrence of evaporite and eolian deposits in late Paleozoic rocks deposited to the west of the study area. Alluvial fans are sites of transport of large volumes of sediment and do not provide an ideal setting for fos- sil preservation. In order to be preserved, plants grew and died in a protected setting and must have been rap- idly buried. Based on the characteristics of the fossils and their encasing strata, it seems that the fossils were deposited in small, isolated wetland areas that formed in abandoned channels in the proximal reaches of the alluvial fan. These abandoned channels may have been fed by springs emerging from the faulted western mar- gin of the Uncompahgre uplift. Although preserved plant material is rare in the proximal Cutler Formation, the two occurrences documented here provide new in- formation about climate conditions during deposition of some of the older portions of the late Paleozoic Cut- ler. Based on these results it appears that vegetation was common in and adjacent to low-lying wet areas at the time some of the older portions of the Cutler Formation were being deposited. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Bureau of Land Management for its assistance with this project; it would not have been 24 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 possible without the help and advice provided by Harley Armstrong, Madeline Grant-Hoffman, and David (Scott) Gerwe. The work was conducted under U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Colorado State Office Paleontological Resources Use Permits COC76491 and COC76492. We thank Dr. Bill DiMichele, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, for his assistance and patience in helping us to identify and interpret plant material collected for this and other studies of the Cutler Formation. We also thank Dr. DiMichele for agreeing to allow us to use the National Museum of Natural History as the repository for our samples. We thank Dan Chaney, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, for his guidance in preparing the samples for shipment to the Smithsonian. We thank Jack Stanesco, Red Rocks Community College, for his assistance in the field. We thank the reviewers of this manuscript (Doug Sprinkel and Tom Chidsey, Utah Geological Survey; Steve Schamel, GeoX Consulting; Brooks Britt, Brigham Young University; and Jerry Waanders, consulting palynologist) for their helpful comments. Finally, we thank the Michigan Space Grant Consortium for its financial support, which made it possible for the first author to first visit the study area during a field-based course for pre-college teachers that was taught by the second author and offered as a graduate course by Michigan Technological University. REFERENCES Arnold, C.A., 1941, Some Paleozoic plants from central Colorado and their stratigraphic s i g n i f i c a n c e : Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 6, no. 4, p. 59–70. Arnold, C.A., 1958, Petrified cones of the genus Cala- mostachys from the Carboniferous of Illinois: Con- tributions from the Museum of Paleontology, Uni- versity of Michigan, v. 14, no. 10, p. 149–165. Baker, A.A., and Reeside, J.B., Jr., 1929, Correlation of the Permian of southern Utah, northern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and southwestern Col- orado: American Association of Petroleum Geolo- gists Bulletin, v. 13, p. 1413-1448. Barbeau, D.L., 2003, A flexural model for the Paradox Basin—implication for the tectonics of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains: Basin Research, v. 15, p. 97-115. Blakey, R.C., and Ranney, W., 2008, Ancient landscapes of the Colorado Plateau: Grand Canyon Associa- tion, 156 p. Bump, A.P., and Davis, G.H., 2003, Late Cretaceous-ear- ly Tertiary Laramide deformation of the northern Colorado Plateau, Utah and Colorado: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 25, no. 3, p. 421-440. Cain, S.A., and Mountney, N.P., 2009, Spatial and tem- poral evolution of a terminal fluvial fan system—the Permian Organ Rock Formation, south-east Utah, USA: Sedimentology, v. 56, p. 1774-1800. Campbell, J.A., 1979, Lower Permian depositional sys- tem, northern Uncompahgre Basin, in Baars, D.L., editor, Permianland field symposium: Four Corners Geological Society, Guidebook 9, p. 13–21. Campbell, T.L., 2003, Paleoclimatic implications of the Cutler Formation, undivided (Pennsylvanian– Permian), near Gateway, Colorado: Houghton, Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis, 95 p. Cater, F.W., Jr., 1955, Geology of the Gateway quadran- gle, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Map GQ-55, 1 sheet, scale 1:24,000. Chawner, W.D., 1935, Alluvial fan flooding, the Mon- trose, California flood of 1934: Geographical Re- view, v. 25, p. 255–263. Condon, S.M., 1997, Geology of the Pennsylvanian and Permian Cutler Group and Permian Kaibab Lime- stone in the Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2000-P, 46 p. DiMichele, W.A., Cecil, C.B., Chaney, D.S., Elrick, S.D., and Nelson, W.J., 2014, Fossil floras from the Penn- sylvanian-Permian Cutler Group of southeastern Utah, in MacLean, J.S., Biek, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., editors, Geology of Utah’s far south: Utah Geologi- cal Association Publication 43, p. 491–504. DiMichele, W.A., Chaney, D.S., Kerp, H., and Lucas, S.G., 2010, Late Pennsylvanian floras in western 25 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 equatorial Pangea, Cañon del Cobre, New Mexico: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 49, p. 75–113. DiMichele, W.A., and Falcon-Lang, H.J., 2012, Calami- talean “pith casts” reconsidered: Review of Palaeo- botany and Palynology, v. 173, p. 1–14. DiMichele, W.A., Pfefferkorn, H.W., and Gastaldo, R.A., 2001, Response of Late Carboniferous and Early Permian plant communities to climate change: An- nual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 29, p. 461–487. Dubiel, R.F., Huntoon, J.E., Stanesco, J.D., Condon, S.M., and Mickelson, D., 1996, Permian-Triassic depositional systems, paleogeography, paleocli- mate, and hydrocarbon resources in Canyonlands, Utah: Colorado Geological Survey Open-File Re- port 96-4, 24 p. Gastaldo, R.A., 1986, Implications on the paleoecology of autochthonous lycopods in clastic sedimentary environments of the Early Pennsylvanian of Ala- bama: Palaeogeography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeo- ecology, v. 53, no. 2–4, p. 191–212. Gastaldo, R.A., 1987, Confirmation of Carboniferous clastic swamp communities: Nature, v. 326, p. 869– 871. Gastaldo, R.A., and Demko, T.M., 2011, The relation- ship between continental landscape evolution and the plant-fossil record—long term hydrological con- trols on preservation, in Allison, P.A., and Bottjer, D.J., editors, Taphonomy—process and bias through time: Topics in Geobiology, v. 32, p. 249–285. Gastaldo, R.A., Pfefferkorn, H.W., and DiMichele, W.A., 1995, Taphonomic and sedimentologic char- acterization of roof-shale floras, in Darrah, W.C., and Lyons, P.C., editors, Historical perspective of early twentieth century Carboniferous paleobota- ny: Geological Society of America Memoir 185, p. 341–352. Hite, R.J., and Buckner, D.H., 1981, Stratigraphic cor- relations, facies concepts, and cyclicity in Penn- sylvanian rocks of the Paradox Basin, in Weigand, D.L., editor, Geology of the Paradox Basin: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, p. 147–159. Huntoon, J.E., Boks, K., Mankowski, L., Campbell- Wyrembelski, T.L., Dubiel, R.F., and Stanesco, J.D., 2014, Fossil plants from a proximal alluvial-fan complex: implications for late Paleozoic sedimentary processes in western tropical Pangea, in MacLean, J.S., Biek, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., editors, Geology of Utah’s far south: Utah Geological Association Publication 43, p. 473–490. Jordan, O.D., and Mountney, N.P., 2010, Styles of inter- action between aeolian, fluvial and shallow marine environments in the Pennsylvanian to Permian low- er Cutler beds, south-east Utah, USA: Sedimentolo- gy, v. 57, p. 1357-1385. Jordan, O.D., and Mountney, N.P., 2012, Sequence stratigraphic evolution and cyclicity of an ancient coastal desert system—the Pennsylvanian-Permian lower Cutler beds, Paradox Basin, Utah, USA: Jour- nal of Sedimentary Research, v. 82, p. 755-780. Langford, R.P., and Chan, M.A., 1988, Flood surfaces and deflations surface within the Cutler Formation and Cedar Mesa Sandstone (Permian), southeast- ern Utah: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 100, no. 10, p. 1541-1549. Looy, C.V., Kerp, H., Duijnstee, I.A.P., and DiMichele, W.A., 2014, The late Paleozoic ecological-evolution- ary laboratory, a land-plant fossil record perspec- tive: The Sedimentary Record, v. 12, no. 4, p. 4–10. Mack, G.H., and Rasmussen, K.A., 1984, Alluvial-fan sedimentation of the Cutler Formation (Permo- Pennsylvanian) near Gateway, Colorado: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 109–116. Mamay, S.H., and Bateman, R.M., 1991, Archaeocala- mites lazarii, sp. nov.—the range of Archaeocalami- taceae extended from the lowermost Pennsylvanian to the mid-Lower Permian: American Journal of Botany, v. 78, no. 4, p. 489–496. Mankowski, L.C., 2003, Structural mapping of the Un- compahgre front near Gateway, Colorado—field evidence of an ancestral Rocky Mountain decolle- ment: Houghton, Michigan Technological Univer- sity, M.S. thesis, 88 p. 26 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 Mountney, N.P., 2006, Periodic accumulation and de- struction of aeolian erg sequences in the Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone, White Canyon, southern Utah, USA: Sedimentology, v. 53, p. 789-823. Nuccio, V.F., and Condon, S.M., 1996, Burial and ther- mal history of the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colo- rado, and petroleum potential of the Middle Penn- sylvanian Paradox Formation, in Huffman, A.C., Jr., Lund, W.R., and Godwin, L.H., editors, Geology and resources of the Paradox Basin: Utah Geologi- cal Association Publication 25, p. 57-76. O’Keefe, J.M.K., Hower, J.C., Hatch, R., and Bartley, S., 2011, Fungal forms in Miocene Eel River coals—ex- traction across a rank suite [abs.]: The Palynolog- ical Society, Southampton, United Kingdom, 44th Annual Meeting of American Association of Strati- graphic Palynologist Program with Abstracts, p. 30. O’Keefe, J.M.K., and Eble, C.F., 2012, A comparison of HF-based and non HF-based palynology process- ing techniques in clay-rich lignites from the Clai- borne Group, upper Mississippi Embayment, Unit- ed States: Palynology, v. 36, p. 116–130. Rankey, E.C., 1997, Relations between relative changes in sea level and climate shifts—Pennsylvanian- Permian mixed carbonate-siliciclastic strata western United States: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 109, no. 9, p. 1089–1100. Rothwell, G.W., Maples, G., and Mapes, R.H., 1997, Late Paleozoic conifers of North America: structure, diversity and occurrences: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 95, no. 1, p. 95–113. Sahagian, D., Proussevitch, A., and Carlson, W., 2002, Timing of Colorado Plateau uplift: Initial con- straints from vesicular basalt-derived paleoeleva- tions: Geology, v. 30, no. 9, p. 807-810. Scotese, C.R., and McKerrow, W.S., 1990, Revised world maps and introduction: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, v. 12, no. 1, p. 1–21. Soreghan, G.S., Sweet, D.E., Marra, K.R., Eble, C.F., Soreghan, M.J., Elmore, R.D., Kaplan, S.A., and Blum, M.D., 2007, An exhumed late Paleozoic land- scape in the Rocky Mountains: Journal of Geology, v. 115, p. 473–481. Soreghan, G.S., Soreghan, M.J., Sweet, D.E., and Moore, K.D., 2009, Hot fan or cold outwash? Hypothesized proglacial deposition in the upper Paleozoic Cutler Formation, western tropical Pangea: Journal of Sed- imentary Research, v. 79, p. 495–522. Stanesco, J.D., Dubiel, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., 2000, Depositional environments and paleotectonics of the Organ Rock Formation of the Permian Cutler Group, southeastern Utah, in Sprinkel, D.A., Chidsey, T.C., Jr., and Anderson, P.B., editors, Geology of Utah’s national parks and monuments: Utah Geological Association Publication 28, p. 591- 605. Tidwell, W.D., 1998, Common fossil plants of western North America, 2nd edition: Washington, Smithso- nian Institution Press, p. 38–39, 70–71, 87–88, and 90. Trudgill, B.D., 2011, Evolution of salt structures in the northern Paradox Basin—controls on evaporite deposition, salt wall growth and super-salt strati- graphic architecture: Basin Research, v. 23, no. 6, p. 208-238. Turnbow, D.R., 1955, Permian and Pennsylvanian rocks of the Four Corners area—geology of parts of Para- dox, Black Mesa and San Juan Basins: Four Corners Geological Society Guidebook, Four Corners Field Conference, p. 66-69. Walker, T.R., 1967, Formation of redbeds in modern and ancient deserts: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 78, p. 353–368. Werner, W.G., 1974, Petrology of the Cutler Formation (Pennsylvanian–Permian) near Gateway, Colorado, and Fisher Towers, Utah: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 44, p. 292–298. White, M.A., and Jacobsen, J.I., 1983, Structures associ- ated with the southwest margin of the ancestral Un- compahgre uplift, in Averett, W.R., editor, Northern Paradox Basin—Uncompahgre uplift: Grand Junc- tion Geological Society, Field Guidebook, p. 33-39. Wittry, J., 2006, The Mazon Creek fossil flora: Downers 27 Stratigraphy and Fossil Plants from the Cutler Formation (Late Paleozoic) and their Paleoclimatic Implications, Eastern Paradox Basin, Colorado Grazul, K.R., Huntoon, J.E., and O’Keefe, J.M.K. Geology of the Intermountain West 2015 Volume 2 Grove, Esconi Associates, 154 p. Ye, H., Royden, L., Burchfiel, C., and Schuepbach, M., 1996, Late Paleozoic deformation of interior North America—the greater Ancestral Rocky Mountains: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bul- letin, v. 80, no. 9, p. 1397–1432.