







































   | 47 
 

         Geoplanning 
     Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56                                                                                                                                                            Journal of Geomatics and Planning 

                                                                                                 E-ISSN: 2355-6544 
http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning  

doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56  

Mapping of Waste Management Planning Based on Society and 
Geographic Conditions 

N. Widyaningsiha*, S. Sasakib   

a Urban Planning, Esa Unggul University, Indonesia 
b Department of Sociology, Teikyo University, Japan 

Abstract: Household solid waste is a major environmental issue, not only in big cities 
but also in suburban areas. Setia Asih Village location is in Kecamatan Tarumajaya, 
Kabupaten Bekasi. Bekasi is closed with Jakarta, and it has unique characteristics, such 
as the dual market economy, administration system, and the local people's social 
culture. Setia Asih Village has tremendous unmanaged household solid waste. It covers 
the land and the river. This research paper used a qualitative approach due to the 
limited statistical data on the village level in Indonesia. The preliminary observation 
showed that local people do not know about managing their household solid waste. 
Their local government does not have any responsibility to manage the household solid 
waste on the village level. It becomes the local people's responsibility. There is a lack of 
coordination among stakeholders in household solid waste management at Setia Asih 
Village. I conducted the solid waste management training for 300 people and Focus 
Group Discussion (FGD) with each Dusun (lower level than a village) representative. I 
found that local people have solutions to solve their household solid waste problem. 
The local government builds a new waste bank as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 
from state-owned enterprises. 
 
  

Copyright © 2020 GJGP-UNDIP  
This open access article is distributed under a  

Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) 4.0 International license. 

How to cite (APA 6th Style): 
Widyaningsih, N., & Sasaki, S. (2020). Mapping of Waste Management Planning Based on Society and Geographic Conditions. Geoplanning: Journal 
of Geomatics and Planning, 7(1), 47-56. doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

 
 

1. INTRODUCTION 

Recent studies related to waste management in the regional scope have become the focus of research 
in this decade (Giovanis, 2015; Ko et al., 2020; Prajapati & Patel, 2018; Ramandey, 2016). Several 
discussions highlighted the involvement of stakeholders in independent waste management in each region 
(Indrianti, 2016; Lederer et al., 2015; Suthar et al., 2016). The trend in parts of the world is household solid 
waste (Babaei et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2015; Dhokhikah et al., 2015). Household solid waste is still the biggest 
issue in most developing countries in Asia, one of which is Indonesia. 

Indonesia had more than 260 million people in 2019. They concentrate in big cities, such as Jakarta, 
Surabaya, and Medan. As a capital city, Jakarta has more than 10 million people live there (a.k.a. megacity). 
Jakarta has supporting areas, such as Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi (JABODETABEK). Bekasi has the 
biggest number of housing sales last year compared to the other supporting areas. Bekasi also has the 
biggest number of population growth rate than the other supporting areas. They do not have household 
solid waste composition data for inorganic and organic waste. The phenomena show us that the Bekasi 
area can transform into a fast-growing city based on its population and its easy access to Jakarta. The peri-
urban area of Jakarta Metropolitan Area is still growing faster than the core area, DKI Jakarta. The 
population growth in the peri-urban has converted land uses from mostly agriculture to urban (Winarso et 
al., 2015). 

Article Info: 
Received: 30 July 2018 
in revised form: January 2019 
Accepted: January 2020 
Available Online: 7 July 2020 
 

Keywords:  
Household Solid Waste, Focus Group 
Discussion, Corporate Social 
Responsibility, Mapping of waste 
Management 
 

*Corresponding Author: 
Niluh Widyaningsih 
Urban Planning, Esa Unggul 
University, Indonesia  
Email: nhwidya@yahoo.com  

OPEN ACCESS 

http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/geoplanning
https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56
mailto:nhwidya@yahoo.com


 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 
doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

48 | 
 

The increasing number of populations relate to the increasing number of household needs, such as the 
demand for housing, clothes, and food. People cannot live without their basic needs. Since the Industrial 
Revolution, there is a huge development in the transportation, health service, manufacturing, and 
communication sectors. In the 19th and 20th centuries, all of those sectors' development is faster and 
bigger with information and technology (IT). We called it the globalization era, where people can connect 
without border, space, or time limitations. Technological advancements, which have risen above simply 
being a development, affect generation procedures and day by day life of consumers by changing their 
habits and behaviors (Alim, 2019). Since the industrial revolution, the use of plastic has increased manifold 
without improving its adequate management as a waste. Most of the plastic waste produced in the world is 
mainly from packaging industry followed by building and construction (Hameed et al., 2019). 

People engaged in more daily routines and need more practical food serving (a.k.a. packaging for food 
products). In ancient times, we know only natural packaging from leaves or dried animal's skin. For 
example, if we go to a different place or travel and we need to carry our food, we wrap it with a big leaf or 
use dried goatskin. All-natural packaging materials changed into plastic, which has specific characteristics 
that can beat other packaging materials. Plastic packaging materials are easy to fold, low price, waterproof, 
and light to carry out. 

People would do more consumption activities if the advertisements on non-food and food products 
were intense on the television (Widyaningsih, 2015). Besides that, people in big cities live close to each 
other due to the scarcity of land for housing. So, it makes people easy to communicate with each other 
during their free time, and it becomes unpaid advertisement media among people. After we do the 
consumption activities, we create waste and pollution to the environment. Most people do not know any 
knowledge and information to manage their household solid waste from their house before they throw it 
into the temporary waste area. They let the local government and the scavengers are managing their 
household solid waste. In developing countries, we can easily find scavengers as an informal, hidden 
market economy. In the Jakarta area, the percentage of inorganic waste is higher than organic waste. 
Jakarta has a high regional minimum wage compares to other areas. This income level makes people in 
Jakarta can shift the consumption pattern. Their consumption is also higher on non-food products than on 
food products. 

Bekasi has almost the same conditions as in Jakarta, such as population number is big, high mobility of 
the people, and close distance between Jakarta - Bekasi. The only difference is that the local government 
does not manage their local household solid waste on the village level. From my preliminary observation at 
Setia Asih Village last January 2018, I could see plastic waste covers almost the soil or land and river. Local 
people do not pay much attention to land pollution everywhere around the Bekasi area. They do not 
bother with their solid waste around their house area. They do not have any penalty from the local 
government if they ignore their household solid waste. Most local people throw their household solid 
waste into unmanaged areas or the closest vacant/empty area. 

Some previous research only focused on how to manage waste, but did not pay attention to regional 
aspects that could help facilitate waste management (Eriksson et al., 2005; Johnson, 2017; Khandelwal et 
al., 2019; Liikanen et al., 2018). Seeing the existing gaps, this paper aims to map the area in determining 
service zones in waste management. This research paper used a mix-methods approach to gather more 
information from the field because there is no data or updated data statistically from the local government, 
especially household solid waste at Setia Asih Village. I combined the secondary data and the primary data 
to support the analysis and results. In the end, the research paper will be used for the local government 
and local people to set up a new mechanism for their household solid waste management based on their 
local characteristics (social and geography conditions) through a waste bank system. 

 

 

 

 

 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 

 doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56  

                                                               

| 49  
 

2. DATA AND METHODS 

The research started at the end of the last year, 2017, where I helped on Corporate Social Responsibility 
(CSR) program from one of the state-owned enterprises in Jakarta to build a waste bank in one region of 
Jakarta's supporting areas. The main idea is not on the physical new waste bank building but especially on 
the household solid waste management system based on the local absolute advantage. For example, if a 
local region has a household solid waste problem and does not get any non/institution funding, the state-
owned enterprise is willing to help society. My first observation is that Setia Asih Village has a good 
financial track record with the state-owned enterprise. The local people do not have any household solid 
waste management system yet. 

Based on the secondary data for their administration level, we found that Setia Asih Village location is in 
Kecamatan Tarumajaya (kecamatan is higher level than village) and the location is in Kabupaten Bekasi 
(kabupaten is higher level than kecamatan). There are eight villages in Kecamatan Tarumajaya, such as: (a) 
Pusaka Rakyat Village; (b) Setia Asih Village; (c) Pahlawan Setia Village; (d) Setia Mulya Village; (e) Segara 
Makmur Village; (e) Pantai Makmur Village; (f) Segarajaya Village; and (g) Samudra Jaya Village. Setia Asih 
Village has the biggest number of Rukun Tetangga or RT (around 90-100 households in one RT). This village 
has 110 RT, 32 Rukun Warga or RW (RW is higher level than RT) and seven Dusun (dusun is higer level than 
RW). 

Setia Asih Village has the biggest population, which is 41,548 people (20,879 males and 20,669 females) 
in 2016. Their household number is 10,065, which is still the biggest number compared to the other villages 
and has an average of 4-5 persons per household. The number is higher than on my previous research in 
Kecamatan Duren Sawit, East Jakarta, which has 3-4 persons per household. It means the demand for food 
and non-food products for basic needs will be higher at Setia Asih Village than in Kecamatan Duren Sawit, 
East Jakarta. If the demand increases, so do the household consumption. It means more waste on the 
environment. 

Setia Asih Village has heterogenic people with an open-minded society that can accept the socio-culture 
changes dynamically. They have a dual market economy, where I found the traditional market in front of 
the Local Government Office (Kantor Kepala Desa) and minimarkets, such as Alfamart or Indomaret. These 
markets have different characteristics, but both give plastic shopping bags to the customers. In Indonesia, 
we called the plastic shopping bag plastic kresek. I interviewed with semi-structured questionnaires to 
gather the primary data. I randomly used samples or respondents (in school, traditional market, 
minimarket, local bank, local business area, or government officers). 

People live unevenly distributed among the sub-region of Setia Asih Village area. We will see the used 
area spreading on the local map later. Almost 50% of the area is for regular housing areas, markets, and 
schools. The rest of the areas are for housing complex projects, and they are still vacant/empty land. They 
do not have the Setia Asih Village map administratively. So, I used the online Google map to spot the areas 
and the new waste bank potential location at Setia Asih Village. 

The local people work in the agriculture sector, such as farming (chicken, duck, and catfish) and 
independent farming for their household needs (vegetable and fruit). I found that each household could 
develop their own small farm/pond in their own backyard. They do not need a big area. For example, they 
do farming in a portable big pond for the catfish. It is space efficiency farming with a bigger number on 
their harvesting than traditional farming. 

To build a household solid waste management system at Setia Asih Village, I divided this research 
framework into three sections, such as: 

a. Mapping of Social condition from their population number, housing types, and work fields. 

b. Mapping of Environment condition from the local map – housing area or vacant/empty area. 

c. Mapping of Economic condition from their number of savings book accounts through the state-owned 
enterprise. 

I used a qualitative approach by conducting: firstly, the general training on household solid waste on 
April 21, 2018, that divided into two sections – in the morning from 9 am-12 pm and in the afternoon from 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 
doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

50 | 
 

1 pm-4 pm. More than 300 people attended the event. The event collaborated with the state-owned 
enterprise for its CSR program (Figure 1). Secondly, I gathered the information deeply about the household 
solid waste issues and their local solutions based on their capability and capacity. The FGD was conducted 
on April 25, 2018, from 1 pm-4 pm with each Dusun representative (two people). The total number who 
attended the second event were eight Dusun multiples by two people is the same as 16 people. Still, only 
10 people attended the FGD because of the bad rain weather in Setia Asih Village (Figure 2). We had a one-
person representative from Tabungan Desa (Village Savings Bank), the representative for the CSR program 
from the state-owned enterprise, and the representative from the local government officials who became 
the household collector leader. 

 

 

 

Figure 1. Training on Household Solid Waste 

 

 

 

Figure 2. Focus Group Discussion on the Household Solid Waste Management 

 

 

 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 

 doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56  

                                                               

| 51  
 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Setia Asih Village location is a very attractive area because it closes with the capital city with easy access 
(transportation); the local people have some home-industries that have the export quality of products 
(food products and batik linen to improve their economic condition); and many potential areas for a 
housing complex in the future (environment aspect). The important thing is they are willing to learn how to 
manage their household solid waste. The solid waste comes from the household. I find it floating on the 
river and almost in every corner of the road, especially for the vacant/empty area. It around 55% of the 
household solid waste is organic waste, and the rest is an inorganic waste. 

From the first event training on the introduction about household solid waste, the representative from 
all levels of community associations attended the morning session. They are representative from each RT 
(two people) and community leaders, such as housewife group, a home industry group, youth group, non-
government organization, religious group, local school, and local market community). They were very 
interested in listening to the training and the explanation about household solid waste. Here are some 
semi-structured interview responses during that event: 

“Basically, we do not know how to manage our household solid waste. So far, we just throw it to the 
closest vacant/empty area. We used the vacant/empty area behind one of the housing complex walls. Now, 
after listening to the information about household solid waste and solid waste management, we know that 
our household solid waste can have economic value and can be recycled products.” (Alias Mrs. Yuni) 

“Our villagers can support the new waste bank, but not all of us live close with the waste collector 
positions. So far, we collected our plastic bottles from house to house into a big empty house/room, and 
sometimes there are waste collectors who helped to sell it.” (Alias Mr. Anto) 

“We thought that inorganic and organic waste would be degradable by nature together whenever we 
put it. We do not know that we can use organic waste into liquid organic fertilizer and inorganic waste into 
the recycled product." (Alias Mr. Udin) 

First, there is no statistical data regarding the household solid waste composition (plastic, paper, glass, 
and metal) at Setia Asih Village. I used an approximate number (after discussing with the local government 
officials, the state-owned enterprise, and the community leader). Each person creates around 0.5 – 1 
kilogram (kg) of household solid waste every day. The average number of people per household at Setia 
Asih Village is 4 – 5 people. The total population is 41,548 people multiple by 0.7 kg (the average value) for 
each person from the demography data. The total number of unmanaged household solid waste every day 
is 29,084 kg per day without any support from the local government at the village level to manage it 
properly. 

Second, I searched for information at Setia Asih Village for the waste collectors who buy the household 
solid waste, such as plastic, paper, glass, and metal. The informal, hidden market economy system for the 
scavengers on the solid waste is not open access data than any other job fields. It made the research for the 
solid waste price was difficult. My observation along the river showed that almost all of the soil blended 
with plastic waste for years. It is a tremendous solid waste. There are used plastic wrap, dirty bottles or 
paper, and used styrofoam packaging. So, when the building construction officers built the new waste bank 
building (March 2018), it was hard to dig the soil blended with plastic waste (Figure 5). It took a long time 
to finish the job. Besides that, from statistical data, Setia Asih Village has the biggest store (397) in 2016 
compared to other villages at Kecamatan Tarumajaya. The second biggest store is Pusaka Rakyat Village 
(250) and Pantai Makmur Village (146). Of course, these stores will add easier access for the local people to 
buy more stuff (food and non-food products) whether they do the consumption with rational thinking (buy 
the products only if they need them) or they buy the products to satisfy their other thought (buy the 
products because they want to have it or for their prestige only). 

Third, the housing distance at Setia Asih Village is distributed unevenly. No administrative local map, and 
I used the online search engine (Google) to plot the area, including the new waste bank position. In the 
future, the new waste bank position is in the corner of the river at Setia Asih Village. They will build a 
playground for the kids and a public park also. Below are the local maps for Kabupaten Bekasi (Figure 3) 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 
doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

52 | 
 

and Setia Asih Village (Figure 4). In Figure 4, I divided the region into four quadrants to make it easier to 
analyze the region: 

a. Quadrant 1 has a vacant/empty area, and there will be a new housing complex in the future. 

b. Quadrant 2 has two housing complex areas (Green Ara and Cluster Somerset), and part of the area is 
vacant/empty area. 

c. Quadrant 3 has two housing complex areas (Perumahan Wahana Harapan and Perum Pesona Bumi 
Insani), and there are local schools, minimarkets, and mosques. 

d. Quadrant 4 has two housing complex areas (De Residence and Perum Puri Harapan), local banks, and 
public utilities. This quadrant is close with Harapan Indah Bekasi for business. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Map of Bekasi, West Java 

 

 

 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 

 doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56  

                                                               

| 53  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Map of Quadrant Analysis for Setia Asih Waste Management 

 

After the household solid waste training, the local government chose the people involved in the 
household solid waste management and people to manage the new waste bank at Setia Asih Village. From 
each Dusun, they have one person to be their preventatives or as a waste collector who brings the 
household solid waste to the new waste bank. I explained how to manage the household solid waste from 
their house before throwing it into the temporary waste area and the new waste bank mechanism for the 
household solid waste based on the conditions. 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 
doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

54 | 
 

 

 

Figure 5. The New Waste Bank Location at Setia Asih Village 

 

The local government, the local people (through their representatives), the state-owned enterprise 
(under the CSR program manager), and I agreed that we are going to implement the household solid waste 
to clean up the region from the household solid waste (Figure 6): 

a. The waste collector officer will collect the household solid waste (twice a week) from each household, 
and s/he will bring it to the new waste bank for people who live far from the new waste bank location. 

b. People who live close to the new waste bank will directly bring their household solid waste to the new 
waste bank location. The new waste bank will open every day with regular office hours. 

c. All the household solid waste must be separated into plastic, paper, glass, and metal because we 
considered the solid waste market. 

d. The household solid waste must be cleaned to be measure at the new waste bank. If it is clean, the price 
is higher on the solid waste market. 

e. Each household must have a savings book account to record all the prices of the household solid waste. 

The informant informed me that around 2,500 – 3,000 people already have a savings book account 
(individually or each household) at Setia Asih Village. Before introducing the new waste bank mechanism, 
the scavenger around Setia Asih Village sells the household solid waste (without being recycled) for a very 
low price. Now, the local people can have extra money from their household solid waste. 

 

Table 1. Setia Asih Village Waste Bank (Price per Kg) 

 

 Type of Solid Waste Price per Kilogram 

Plastic Aqua plastic bottles 
Aqua plastic cups 

7,000 IDR 
5,000 IDR 

Paper Newspaper 
White paper 

1,600 IDR 
1,500 IDR 

Glass  
 
Metal 
Misc. 

Syrup bottles 
Regular glass 
Aluminum  
Wooden stuff 

3,000 IDR for each bottle  
5,000 IDR 
7,500 IDR 
Unidentified 



 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 

 doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56  

                                                               

| 55  
 

Actually, qualitative research can gather more information if we can deeply listen to local people's 
opinions. I can describe it as extra knowledge based on local capability and capacity from the unstructured 
interview. The local people and the local farmers said they could transform the organic household solid 
waste into organic liquid fertilizer. The farmers bought that to use in their farming. Here is one of the inputs 
from the community leader: 

“We could transform the organic household solid waste using the composter tools, and the organic 
liquid fertilizer price is only Rp. 10,000 each bottle. The farmers used it, and the vegetable/fruit is of good 
quality. We just need funding to buy composter tools." (Alias Mr. Toni) 

 

 

 

Figure 6. The New Waste Bank Mechanism 

Finally, Setia Asih Village is one example of how local condition (socio-cultural and their geography 
condition) can solve their household solid waste by their own capacity and capability. They need to build a 
bridge to do the household solid waste management system comprehensively from local government, non-
government institutions, community groups, academic, and all stakeholders (including the waste picker and 
the small home-industry for the recycled products) who involve strengthening the waste management 
system through a waste bank. 

 

4. CONCLUSION 

This research shows that the regional aspect and the role of stakeholders are very important in the 
management of household waste. This research also produces a new mechanism for household waste 
management based on local characteristics. This can be a reference for the government and local 
communities to implement a waste bank system so that waste management can be carried out effectively 
and efficiently. 

 

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I would like to thank all my colleagues at Urban Planning, Esa Unggul University, for their endless 
encouragement and Mr. Rujito at Setia Asih Village for his expert advice on local community development. 
For those who touched my life anyway since I started my post-graduate school at Environmental Science, 
University of Indonesia, you all know who you are. I am truly grateful for all you have done throughout all 
my academic researches. 

 

6. REFERENCES 

Alim, L. D. (2019). The Impact of Industrial Revolution to Marketing. Journal of Social Sciences and 
Humanities, (October). 

Babaei, A. A., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Teymouri, P., Ahmadi, K., & Rafiee, M. (2015). Household recycling 
knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and 
Recycling, 102, 94–100. [Crossref]  

Dai, Y. C., Gordon, M. P. R., Ye, J. Y., Xu, D. Y., Lin, Z. Y., Robinson, N. K. L., … Harder, M. K. (2015). Why 
doorstepping can increase household waste recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 9–
19. [Crossref]  

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.004


 
Widyaningsih and Sasaki / Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, Vol 7, No 1, 2020, 47-56 
doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.7.1.47-56 

56 | 
 

Dhokhikah, Y., Trihadiningrum, Y., & Sunaryo, S. (2015). Community participation in household solid waste 
reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 153–162. [Crossref]  

Eriksson, O., Reich, M. C., Frostell, B., Björklund, A., Assefa, G., Sundqvist, J. O., … Thyselius, L. (2005). 
Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(3), 
241–252. [Crossref]  

Giovanis, E. (2015). Relationship between recycling rate and air pollution: Waste management in the state 
of Massachusetts. Waste Management, 40, 192–203. [Crossref]    

Hameed, M., Bhat, R. A., Singh, D. V., & Mehmood, M. A. (2019). White Pollution. [Crossref]  
Indrianti, N. (2016). Community-based Solid Waste Bank Model for Sustainable Education. Procedia - Social 

and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 158–166. [Crossref]  
Johnson, T. R. (2017). Municipal solid waste management. Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy in 

China, 35, 302–313. [Crossref]  
Khandelwal, H., Thalla, A. K., Kumar, S., & Kumar, R. (2019). Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste 

management options for India. Bioresource Technology, 288, 121515. [Crossref]  
Ko, S., Kim, W., Shin, S. C., & Shin, J. (2020). The economic value of sustainable recycling and waste 

management policies: The case of a waste management crisis in South Korea. Waste Management, 
104, 220–227. [Crossref]    

Lederer, J., Ongatai, A., Odeda, D., Rashid, H., Otim, S., & Nabaasa, M. (2015). The generation of 
stakeholder’s knowledge for solid waste management planning through action research: A case study 
from Busia, Uganda. Habitat International, 50, 99–109. [Crossref]  

Liikanen, M., Havukainen, J., Viana, E., & Horttanainen, M. (2018). Steps towards more environmentally 
sustainable municipal solid waste management – A life cycle assessment study of São Paulo, Brazil. 
Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 150–162. [Crossref]  

Prajapati, D., & Patel, M. (2018). Waste Management in Rural Area case study of Vadaj village, Dabhoi, 
Vadodara, Gujarat, India. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 
5(3), 1–6. 

Ramandey, L. B. (2016). Waste Management Strategic Planning (Waste Management in Jayapura City). 
Waste Technology, 4(1), 13–15. [Crossref]    

Suthar, S., Rayal, P., & Ahada, C. P. S. (2016). Role of different stakeholders in trading of reusable/recyclable 
urban solid waste materials: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 104–115. [Crossref]  

Widyaningsih, N. (2015). Linkage Model between Sustainable Consumption and Household Solid Waste 
Management System. University of Indonesia. 

Winarso, H., Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2015). Peri-urban transformation in the Jakarta metropolitan area. 
Habitat International, 49(June), 221–229. [Crossref]   

 
 
 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.006
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0031-6.ch004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.431
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736761
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121515
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.005
https://doi.org/10.12777/wastech.4.1.13-15
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.024

