







































Georgian Geographical Journal 

Occupied Territories of Sachkhere 

Municipality 
Valeri Kekenadze1,*  
1 TSU, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography 
* Corresponding author: valeri.kekenadze@tsu.ge  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction 

While the historical and geographical research of occupied territories of Sachkhere Municipality 

special attention has been paid to historical toponymy (villages, old villages and microtoponymy), 

retrospective of orthographic and hydrographic naming. For this we studied old and new maps, where 

this territory is given, precision. Our attention was payed to the fact that toponyms of the municipality, 

especially orthographic units on maps and scientific literature is found with different names, also in 

Sachkhere section names of some mountains are not written at all, when all of them are equally 

important. First, we decided to solve this problem, learnt in detail and marked on the map historical and 

modern toponyms. For this we separated on the map village, old village, microtoponym, road,historic 

road, pass, churches,  places  of  old churches, castles, hydrographic network and etc. 

Based on all these it can be said that on our map there are given all the toponyms of research territory 

as well as historic and modern ones. It should be mentioned that in the process of research works of 

Vakhushti Bagrationi were very helpful, also notices of Giuldenshtedti and Russian versions maps of 

XIX century. We used and compared to each other cartographic works of Alexandre and Ivane 

Javakhishvili.  

In the process of research except historical –geographic parts, we presented issued of medical 

geography. which refers to the local balneological resort Lesevs, but there is almost no information 

about it in the literature that we have learnt. As an example of this it will be enough the ways of treatment 

of psoriasis by Lesevs mud and treating skin and gastrointestinal tract by local acid waters. Readers 

also will get information about the notices of local respondents, which refer to many important issues. 

Research will help the readers who are interested in local history and geography. 

Methods and Materials 

The Vakhushti map is of greater importance for restoring the historical and geographical picture of 

the region, but it is very scarce and due to its scale, does not give a complete picture, nevertheless, its 

role as a source is immeasurably great. It was the map of Vakhushti and his works that helped us to 

correctly read many toponyms on the map with Russian terminology and incorrect translation. It should 

be noted that the Russian map is immeasurably great in restoring the toponymy of the historical 

settlements of early Georgia in the 19th century (Map of the Caucasus region XIX-XX, 1905). The 

Georgian Geographical Journal, 2024, 4(2) 84-91 

© The Author(s) 2024 

 
This article is an open access article distributed under 

the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons 

Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// 

creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 

DOI: 

https://journals.4science.ge/index.php/GGJ 

Abstract 

The civil war of the 1990s, the weakness of coordination of the newly formed 

law enforcement agencies of the Republic of Georgia made it easier for the 

Russian Federation to achieve its aggressive anti-legal goals in two large 

historical regions of Georgia - the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and the 

northern part of Shida Kartli (Tskhinvali, Java, Znauri, Kornisi).The Russian-

backed separatist forces managed to escape from the control of official Tbilisi 

by forming their own illegal territorial associations. It is widely known that 

the activities of the separatist forces are much more active on the side of Shida 

Kartli than on the direction of Imereti, therefore, most of our citizens do not 

know that the so-called South Ossetia, the Russian Federation has occupied 

an important territory in the northeast of the Sachkhere municipality of Zemo-

Imereti. Historically, as well as geographically, this area is practically not 

studied. Based on the current situation, it is practically impossible to study 

this territory directly in the field, but we tried to obtain several important 

information from local forced migrants (Vitaly Bakhturidze, Mevludi 

Kusiani). Which gives us a basis for important conclusions when summarized 

together with archival materials. 

Keywords: History, Geography, Occupied, Cartography, Border 

Citation: Kekenadze, V. Occupied 
Territories of Sachkhere Municipality. 
Georgian Geographical Journal 2024, 

4(2). 84-91 

https://doi.org/10.52340/ggj.2024.04.02.10 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

85 
 

materials found on the map of Russia were significantly supplemented and enriched with old historical 

names by the historical map of Ivane Javakhishvili (Javakhishvili, 1923), a map compiled in 1931-1932 

(Javakhishvili, 1932). edited by Alexander Javakhishvili and others. Comparison of the materials shown 

on the mentioned maps helped us a lot in restoring a retrospective picture of the toponymy of the 

occupied territory of the Sachkhere municipality. Comparison of the materials given on the mentioned 

maps helped us a lot in restoring a retrospective picture of the toponymy of the occupied territory of the 

Sachkhere municipality. Based on the information received, we tried to create an approximate historical 

and geographical map of the country, which shows villages, microtoponyms, mountains, passes, rivers 

(with small streams), minerals, historical roads, balneological resorts, churches, parishes, etc. The 

article also talks about some issues of medical geography (treatment of psoriasis and various skin 

diseases with the mud of the Lesevi resort, etc.). Much attention is paid to historical demography 

(settlement and the number of Ossetian and Georgian surnames, the history of settlement). Particular 

attention is paid to the Ossetian and Georgian toponymy. The materials presented above are discussed 

in synthesis with historical events. 

Results 

The territory of the modern municipality of Sachkhere is geographically represented in a very diverse 

space, here you will find both complex terrain and mountainous areas, as well as floodplains and wide-

open plains. The security of the municipality in the eastern and northern directions during the historical 

period was determined by the abundance of orographic objects located here. On the eastern side, the 

mountain system of the Likhsky ridge is isolated, which contributed to its relatively better protection. 

It is a historically known fact that the Likhi ridge was an obstacle to the advance of the enemy, who 

entered Eastern Georgia, into Western Georgia. The eastern line of the municipality is crossed by the 

following mountain system of complex geographical structure: Alkhashenda, Ribisi (modern Lebeuri), 

Biliurta (Obolis), Kardanakhumi, Rustavi, Shaharadeti, Lokhoni, Peranga, Mshvildauri (Shvildis), 

Dziri, Kortokhi, Edishvari and MtaVakisa.The mentioned mountains were an almost insurmountable 

barrier for the enemy advancing from east to west of Georgia. Strengthening the three passes located 

here, if necessary, was very convenient in terms of geographical location and a great advantage against 

the enemy encountered. 

The same can be said about the northern part of the municipality, which is characterized by an even 

more complex geographical structure due to its mountainous terrain. Along the entire border line in the 

direction of Racha there are mountains: Veltkegi, Ketsebi, Didgora, Khikhamta, Sabvi, Phoni, Pepeleti 

(Sabugrao), Dagverila, Sirkhlabirti (Tsitelikle). In the specified geographical area there were six 

difficult passes, the protection of which, if properly fortified, created a very advantageous strategic 

advantage in the fight against the enemy. In written historical sources we find several important 

references to the occupied villages: Vakhushti Bagrationi, Johan Anton Kurt Guldenstedt (Guldenstedt, 

1962) and Beri Egnatashvili. Vakhushti Bagration mentions the area above the village of Chali: 

“However, before Chalida there were no buildings; Garna was built first, where you can see churches 

and nadabars” (Vakhushti Bagrationi, 1997) As we see, Vakhushti describes exactly the territorial area 

that is the subject of our study. 

The northeastern part of the Imereti-Kartli border, east of Mount Peranga, was historically part of the 

Kingdom of Kartli. Describing this area, Vakhushti Bagrationi notes that above the floodplain it is 

completely deserted, and there are only nosebleeds and swamps. This lack of population must have 

been the reason why Ossetians moved here in the 18th-19th centuries and created Ossetian villages, 

which subsequently became the basis for the administrative classification of this territory as the 

administrative district of South Ossetia, and not to the Sachkhere municipality, while the territory is 

geographically it is an integral part of Sachkhere. Moreover, in the 1922 project to create the South 

Ossetian Autonomous Region, Sachkhere was considered as the administrative center of the region 

instead of Tskhinvali, although this project was later rejected. The fluctuation of the mentioned 

administrative division was corrected during the restoration of independent Georgia in the 90s of the 

last century, and this territory was assigned to Sachkhere, although today it is an occupied territory 

(Kekenadze & Katsitadze, 2014). 

Geographical boundary. The border of the Kartli kingdom often crossed the Likhi ridge here, and the 

geographical border was replaced by a political border. According to Vakhushti, the Kartl-Imereti 

border will pass above Lich - near Korbouli, along the Dzirula River, so that it will enter its borders 

from the left bank... (Vakhushti Bagrationi, 1997). Beri Egnatashvili speaks about this section of the 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

86 
 

Kartl-Imereti border, who describes the situation of the 16th century, which some scientists consider to 

be a transfer of its modern borders into the past, but, in our opinion, it was this border that should have 

become the dividing line between Kartl-Imereti from the beginning of time, not the 18th century. 

According to Beri Egnatashvili, the Sachkhere section of the Kartli-Imereti border looks like this: 

,,Tsedisi pass and Kudaro,and behind Mount Chali is Ertso, and behind Mshvildauri and Peranga are 

Goradziris-Akat, Lichi, Godora, Kefiskhevi and Chkheri Castle" (Berdzenishvili, 1966). As we saw 

above, the messages of Vakhushti and Beri coincide with each other. These two researchers are 

contemporaries of each other. According to Güldenstedt, the upper country, the upper region of Khvrili, 

i.e. northeast from Sachkhere to the Likhsky ridge, looks like this: ,,this is a large part of the imperial 

slopes of the intersecting ridge, extending south from the Alps ( Caucasus ridge). The east, i.e. the part 

located along Kartli and on the crest of the ridge, is called Saabashion ( Life of Kartli, 1955). 

Historical roads passing through the occupied territories of Sachkhere were studied by N. 

Berdzenishvili. The roads were as follows: 1) Sachkhere-Chikha-Zana-Khvi-Tamarasheni-Tskhinvali; 

2) Sachkhere – Chikha – Chala -Darka – MtaPeranga – Kornisi – Tsorbisi – Erkneti – Avnevi - Dvani-

Breti; 3) Sachkhere – Chikha – Chala – Darka – MtaPeranga – Gomarta - Khtana – Ozhora – Tigva - 

Atotsi (Berdzenishvili, 1966). 
When mapping the boundaries of the principalities, we encountered a slight misunderstanding: 

whether the territories of modern villages: Perevi, Jriya, Kardzmani, Tedeleti, Jalabeti, Khakhieti, 

Choisi should be included in the Saabashidzeo estate, whose possessions these territories are directly 

separated from. On the one hand, our assumption that this territory was part of the Principality of 

Saabashidzeo was supported by the general geographical confusion of Güldenstdet presented above. 

None of the mentioned villages appear on the map of VakhushtiBagration, which suggests that these 

villages did not exist then. The historical sources we have traced also do not tell us anything about the 

ownership of the territory. It is worth noting that we decided to include this territory in the Saabashidze 

estate due to the fact that these villages and territory are not part of the headquarters of ShidaKartli - 

Samachablo, which borders it in the east. Geographically, this territory belongs more to the Sachkhere 

municipality; they are sharply separated from the villages of the Yavan region by mountains: 

Sirkhlabirti, Alkhashenti, Ribisi, Biliurta, Kardanakhumi, Rustavi. These villages are geographically 

adjacent to the territory of the municipality of Sachkhere (formerly Saabashidzeo) (Kekenadze, 2014). 

Due to the lack of old materials, the study of the historical demography of the occupied territories is 

possible only at the end of the 19th century. Since 1886, periodic demographic censuses began in the 

Russian Empire, and later in the 20th century in the USSR. Population censuses provide information 

about the number of residents of a particular village, ethnic and religious composition, etc. As we 

mentioned above, according to Vakhushti, in the 18th century the population no longer settled in this 

territory; we do not have any information that would confirm the presence of any settlement here before 

1886, although in the 1886 census we already find one The settlement is the village of Tedeleti, whose 

population is entirely Russian. 

This part of Abashidze's Satavado especially suffered from Ossetian attacks, as local empirical 

information tells us, it was as a result of the Ossetian invasions that the previous settlements in this area, 

which Vakhushti calls Nadaburi and Nasoflari, were to be destroyed. The local population apparently 

took refuge in the nearby mountains, where villages appeared: Chitaeti (Chitadzes), Lomureti 

(Lomuridze), Davaeti (Davadzes) and others.The princes of this part of Saabashidzeo are called 

Abashidze Mtachale precisely because they did not live in Bari, in the valley of the Kvirili River. The 

generally accepted rule in this area was to transfer individual surnames to the name of the village, which 

suggests that the toponym Tedeleti recorded here may come from the Ossetian surname Tedelevi. There 

is also no empirical data about this toponym (Kekenadze, 2017). 

According to the 1886 census, the village of Tedeleti is included in the Sachkhere district of Shorapni-

Mazri. The composition of the population is as follows: total households - 28; people – 110; woman – 

117; The total number is 227 people. The majority of the population are Ossetians, all Orthodox 

Christians. Neither the prince nor any of the clergy is registered in Tedeleti. There are 25 houses, 17 

horses, 28 oxen and 28 carts. 

In June-August 1918, an anti-government uprising broke out in the Sachkhere region, ethnic 

Bolshevik forces organized an armed uprising under the command of OsiKharebov and the Georgian 

Bagrat Khvedelidze (Kekenadze, 2013). The newly created independent Georgian government under 

the leadership of General Konstantin Ishkhneli was able to prevent the exit of the Ossetian and Georgian 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

87 
 

Bolsheviks. The villages of the Tedeleti district are mentioned here, since, apparently, at that time the 

village of Tedeleti was presented as the administrative center of the region. 

During the general census of 1926, the picture completely changed, the district is administratively no 

longer on the Sachkhere side (in 1886 it was part of the Sachkhere police district of Shoropni-Mazri), 

but as part of the newly created (1922). It is connected with the Kudaro and Kemultinsky districts of 

the South Ossetian Autonomous Region. In addition to the village of Tedeleti, the following villages 

are already appearing: Sinaguri, Khafalgom (Khampalgom), Khakhieti (Kakheti), Jalabeti (part of 

Kudaro), Tsoisi (Choisi, Noisi), (part of Kemulto). As we can see, the villages in this area have grown 

significantly over the past 30 years. Their numbers and ethnic composition are interesting: Tedeleti - 

only 460 inhabitants, 229 men, 231 women, of which 97.6% are Ossetians, 3.2% are Georgians. As we 

see, unlike 1886, the ethnic Georgian population is now settling in the village; Sinaguri - only 67 

inhabitants, 36 men, 31 women, 80.6% Georgians, 19.4% Ossetians; Khafalgom - a total of 172 

inhabitants, 84 men, 88 women, the population is entirely inhabited by ethnic Ossetians; Khakhieti - 

only 96 inhabitants, 56 men, 40 women, entirely populated by Ossetians; Jalabeti - only 165 inhabitants, 

81 men, 84 women, all Ossetians; Choice - only 50 residents, 30 men, 20 women. 

 

In the 1939 census, the data from previous years was again changed: Hamfalgom - only 121 

inhabitants, 58 men, 63 women (Zanian Village Council); Jalabeti - total 409 inhabitants, 235 men, 174 

women; Zemo Kardzmani - total 345 inhabitants, 175 men, 170 women; Kvemo Kardzmani - total 107 

inhabitants, 56 men, 51 women; Sinaguri - total 98 inhabitants, 51 men, 47 women; Tedeleti - total 527 

inhabitants, 273 men, 254 women; Khakhieti - total 114 inhabitants, 57 men, 57 women (Tedeleti 

Village Council). 

In the 1970 census, quite a lot of changes occur, completely new settlements appear: Tbeti, Perevi and 

Shua Kardzmani, of which Shua Kardzmani and Perev are completely populated by Ossetians and 

belong to the Dzhava district of the South Ossetian Autonomous Region. Sinaguri - a total of 164 

inhabitants, 87 men, 77 women. Entirely populated by ethnic Ossetians; Tedeleti - a total of 316 

inhabitants, 151 men, 165 women. Only the Ossetian population lives in the village; Jalabeti - only 139 

inhabitants, 73 men, 66 women. The village is completely Ossetian; Khakhieti - only 108 inhabitants, 

59 men, 49 women (Ossetian village); Perev - only 36 inhabitants, 15 men, 21 women (Ossetian 

village); Kvemo Kardzmani - only 140 inhabitants, 70 men, 70 women (the village is entirely 

represented by the Georgian population); Zemo Kardzmani - total 103 inhabitants, 45 men, 58 women 

(Ossetian village); Shua Kardzmani - only 71 residents, 33 men, 38 women (Ossetian village); Tbet - 

only 72 inhabitants, 31 men, 41 women.(the village is completely populated by Georgians), (Sinaguri 

village council); Hamfalgom - a total of 49 inhabitants, 19 men, 30 women (Ossetian village), (Tsoni 

village council). 

According to the 1979 census, Shua Kardzmani disappears from rural settlements; we have no other 

significant changes. Sinaguri - total 204 inhabitants, 104 men, 100 women (Ossetians); Tedeleti - total 

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Tdeleti Sinaguri Khafalgomi Khakhieti Jalabeti Choise

Georgian Ossetian

Figure 1.Ethnic groups in the villages of the study area based on 1926 census 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

88 
 

192 inhabitants, 102 men, 90 women (Ossetians);Jalabeti - total 114 inhabitants, 58 men, 56 women 

(Ossetians); Khakhieti - total 93 inhabitants, 51 men, 42 women (Ossetians); Perev - only 35 inhabitants, 

20 men, 15 women (Ossetians); ZemoKardzmani - total 195 inhabitants, 104 men, 91 women 

(Ossetians); Kvemo Kardzmani - total 113 inhabitants, 63 men, 50 women (Georgians); Tbet - a total 

of 53 residents, 32 men, 23 women (Georgians) (Sinaguri village council); Hamfalgom - a total of 24 

inhabitants, 10 men, 14 women (Ossetians) (Tsoni village council). 

According to the 1989 census, significant changes took place in the ethnic composition, the Georgian 

population appeared in villages inhabited only by Ossetians. Sinaguri - total inhabitants 165, men 83, 

women 82. Georgians 53%, Ossetians 45%; Tedeleti - total inhabitants 146 people, 75 men, 7 women. 

Georgians 58%, Ossetians 41%; Jalabeti - only 53 inhabitants, 25 men, 28 women. The population is 

Ossetian; Khakhieti - only 61 inhabitants, 27 men, 34 women. Population - Ossetians; Perevi - only 27 

inhabitants, 12 men, 15 women. Georgians 77%, Ossetians 21%; Kvemo Kardzmani - total of 148 

inhabitants, 69 men, 79 women.Georgians 48%, Ossetians 51%; ZemoKartsman - total 157 inhabitants, 

86 men, 71 women. Georgians 35%, Ossetians 51%; Tbet - a total of 58 residents, 26 men, 32 women. 

Georgians 74%, Ossetians 25% (Sinaguri village council); In Hamfalgom there are only 11 inhabitants, 

6 men, 5 women. Ossuria (Zanian village council) (Geostat, 2024; Javakhishvili, 1923) 

 

In 1991, the Supreme Court of independent Georgia abolished the South Ossetian Autonomous 

Region, artificially created under the Soviet Union without any grounds, thereby restoring historical 

justice. Administratively, the villages confiscated in 1922 were returned to the Sachkhere district. 

Unfortunately, after the well-known events of the 90s, this territory was occupied by the Ossetian-

Russian side. It should be noted that there was no armed confrontation between Georgians and Ossetians 

in the Sachkhere direction throughout the 90s.There was only one moment when the newly created 

Georgian Guard (the first Georgian Guard was created in Sachkhere under the command of Colonel 

Besiki Kutateladze) tried to take some action in the occupied territory of the Sachkhere region, which 

did not lead to any other clashes, except for minor incidents. A small incident was also related to a 

bunch of goods that were confiscated by the Ossetians and distributed to the Georgian population, but 

the local population, on their own initiative, took these goods back to the Ossetians. After the occupation 

of the 90s, only the village of Perevi remained under the jurisdiction of the Georgian side. 

In the 2008 war, as well as during the events of the 90s, during the war, unlike ShidaKartli, there were 

no hostilities in the occupied territories of the Sachkhere municipality, although the Russian side 

occupied the village of Perevi, which was previously part of the South Ossetian autonomous region. 

According to the ceasefire agreement reached on August 12, 2008, the village of Perevi was to be 

handed over to the Russian army, but the Russian army still held this newly occupied territory along 

with the Akhalgori region. On October 14, 2010, during the thirteenth round of Karasini-Abashidze 

negotiations in Geneva, Russian representative Karasin stated: “The Russian Federation has prepared 

and will soon withdraw the Russian border checkpoint from the settlement of Perev, which is located 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Tdeleti Sinaguri Khafalgomi Khakhieti Jalabeti Perevi Kvemo

Kardzmani

Zemo

Kardzmani

Georgian Ossetian

Figure 2. Ethnic groups in the villages of the study area based on 1989 census 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

89 
 

on a geographically disputed territory.” Soon after the agreement, the village of Perevi was transferred 

to the jurisdiction of the Georgian side. It is in Perevo that a Russian checkpoint has now been 

established, through which communication with the occupied territories is carried out. 

The fact that there was never an armed conflict between the local Ossetians and Georgians led to the 

peaceful coexistence of the Georgian population here in the Ossetian-occupied villages, but the Russian 

“peaceful” continent often blocked the road and did not allow the Georgian population to move freely. 

An example of the severity of the situation is the case of the family of Vitaly Bakhturidze, a resident of 

the village of Zemo Kartsman, whose two daughters were unable to cross the Russian checkpoint from 

the occupied territories due to the road being blocked. this is why they were unable to pass the national 

examinations and were forced to abandon higher education. There are quite a lot of similar cases among 

the local population, which leads to the fact that the Georgian population slowly leaves the occupied 

territories and moves to territories controlled by the Georgian side to live, although they still retain their 

property in the occupied territories. territory. 

Currently, the following villages operate in the occupied territories of the Sachkhere 

municipality:Sinaguri, Jalabeti, Tedeleti, Zemo Kartsmani, Kvemo Kartsmani, Tbeti. Villages that 

became rural: Fatkudzhina, Khafalgom, Dzirischala, Kheldakheuli, Sadarno, Choisi, Lohoisa, Gvizga, 

Gomarta.We tried to present the following local microtoponyms on the map: Fizarta, MefiStadsomi, 

Pantevi, Mokhveula, DimitriasNamoslo, Pshanari, Magvlar, Skhliceri, SachinosAho, SandrosAho, 

Dimnalia, Ukvakhe, Silion spring. Mountains: Peranga, Lokhon, Shaharadeti, Rustavi, Varkhnis, 

Kardanakhumi, Topara, Biliurta (Obolis), Ribis (Lebeuri), Dagverila, Sirkhlabirti (Red Rock). Passes 

through: Peranga, Rustavi, Ertso, Sirkhlabirti, Dagverila. Minerals: Coal, oil, gold. During the flood, 

gold-bearing rocks were carried out of the Kakarak gorge; back in Soviet times, it was planned to 

develop a gold deposit in this area, but due to developments this was no longer carried out. 

The Russian map, published in 1906, also shows coal ores north of the village of Tedeleti and mentions 

oil-bearing rocks in several places.George Tsereteli, a nineteenth-century artist, as well as magazines 

and newspapers of the time provide us with information about the oil available here. 

Churches/Parishioners. St. George Gomarti, St. George Fitsarmti, Vahanmti Church, Makvlis Church, 

Pshanari Church. 

Rivers and gorges: Kvirila, Givizga, Obolis water, Kartli gorge, Utsur gorge (Utsur waterfall is located 

here), Fizzarti gorge, Mariantuli gorge. All of these lakes contain large numbers of trout. 

Ossetian toponyms: Darka (large village), Jria, Tedeleti, Sinaguri, Fatkudzhina. 

Resort Lesev. In the occupied territory there is a balneological resort Lesev, famous for its healing 

mud and acidic waters. Since the second half of the 20th century, this place has already become widely 

known and a small boarding house was founded here. Lesevi mud was used to treat skin diseases; it 

was used to treat such serious diseases as psoriasis, lichen versicolor, etc. Currently, the sanatorium is 

not functioning, but residents of the neighboring village still transport this mud through various 

channels and use it for medicinal purposes. Displaced citizen Vitaly Bakhturidze recalls: “Viktor 

Bagaev had a boarding house in Les, where small wooden cottages were built for vacationers. 

Vacationers took both mud baths and were treated in local water baths, taking in acidic waters saturated 

with minerals. Here were the pastures and hayfields of the village of Kyrtsmani. From Vitaly 

Bakhturidze we also recorded the legend about the toponym Heldakheuli: according to legend, Queen 

Tamar is buried in Heldakheuli. The fighters from Heldaheuli will take an oath of silence on Fitzarmt, 

and then kill each other so that no one knows about the location of Tamar's grave. 

Conclusion 

We tried to get information given in historical scientific literature and in cartographic works about 

occupied territories of Sachkhere Municipality. After proper analysis we used information found by us, 

that finally gave us an opportunity to make interesting conclusions. 

In this research great emphasis is made on retrospective cartography of the side, it can be mentioned 

that the aim to represent historical and modern toponymy of the side was mostly done successfully. On 

the map it is separately represented historical toponyms (old villages, microtoponyms), modern 

toponymy, (villages, microtoponyms and hydrographical network), churches old places of churches, 

historical and modern roads, passes, castles, etc. 

Except retrospective cartography, we aimed at publishing specific issues of historical geography of 

the side, in which works of Vakhushti Bagrationi, who had been on the territory of Sachkhere 

Municipality and describes modern or past historic conditions. Also, valuable facts were found is 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

90 
 

specific historic sources and scientific literature. In this work much attention has been payed to the 

issues of historical demography. We showed the change of the local population from 1886 to 1989. 

After introducing our research to readers it will become clear the flexibility of inhabited places of the 

side at this period, also ethnic issues and specifics. Except wide demographic notice, readers will get 

information about administrative division, which village belongs to which region or a local community.  

With historical notices given in the article we tried to show modern condition of the territory, for this 

reason respondents mentioned in the article helped us a lot, who left occupied territories without their 

own permission. Based on the information of this research we made historical –geographic map, that 

makes this work more conspicuous and visible.  
. 

 
    

Competing interests 

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 

ORCID iD  

Valeri Kekenadze  https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7444-391X 

References 

Life of Kartli. (1955). Tbilisi. 

Bagrationi, V. (1997). Atlas of Georgia. Tbilisi. 

Bagrationi, V. (1997). Geography of Georgia. Tbilisi: Science. 



Kekenadze. 2024 4(2) 

91 
 

Berdzenishvili, N. (1966). Roads in Georgia during the Rustaveli era. Tbilisi: Science. 

Geostat. (2024, January 1). Population and Demography. Retrieved from National Statistics Office of Georgia: 

https://www.geostat.ge/ka 

Guldenstedt. (1962). Trip to Georgia. Volume I. Tbilisi. 

Javakhishvili, A. (1932). Map of Georgia 1931–1932. Tbilisi. 

Javakhishvili, I. (1923). Map of Georgia, 1923. Tbilisi. 

Kekenadze, V. (2013). Historical roads of Imereti. Tbilis. 

Kekenadze, V. (2014). Retrospective cartography of the Imereti principalities. Modern Problems of geography 

and antropology, (pp. 422-428). Tbilisi. 

Kekenadze, V. (2017). Historical toponym of the Sachkhere municipality. Collection of works of the onomastic 

laboratory. 

Kekenadze, V., & Katsitadze, T. (2014). Anti-government uprising in Sachkhere (June-August 1918. Tbilisi. 

Map of the Caucasus region XIX-XX. (1905). 

  


