Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 68 Georgian Scientists Vol. 6 Issue 1, 2024 https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2024.06.01.10 “ 1, 2 1 , ; 2 , “ , , , , , ; , „ “, ; , , „ “ . : , ( ), , , , , ; . , , , , , ; : , , , , , ; Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 69 “ ( ) , , , , . : , , , , , , , , . „ “ , , , , , . , , , , , . „ “, , , , : , , , , , , , , , , “, . , , ( ; , ), ( , ), . , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 70 . , , , , , , ( ) ; „ “ , ; , , , , , , , ; , , , ; , , : , , , , , , , . , , , „ “ , , , , „ “ ; , , . , , , , . „ “ , ; ; , , „ “ (1916–1962) , ; Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 71 , , , , , : , , , „ ,“ , „ “ . . : , , ; , „ “ . , , , , „ “; , , , , „ “ , ; : „ ,“ , , ; . , , , , : , , , ; , , , ; , ( , – , , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 72 ), ; , , , , ; ), , ; , , , , , , , , , ; , , ; , , , „ “ ; , „ “ ) . „ “ , , , „ “ , . “ , , . : , ( ), ( ). , , , ; , ; ( ) ( ) , , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 73 . , – , ; , ( 2018 , “). „ “ . , , : , , , , . , , , , . “ : 1. , , , , ; , , , ( ) , „ “ , , , , , ; 2. , , , , ; , ( ) . 3. : , , , , “ Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 74 ; ( ) . 4. „ “ ( , , ) ; ; , , : , ( ), ( ); 5. , , ; , , , , , , , , ; , , ; 6. „ “); : , , , ; , , : , , , , , „ “ ; , , , , „ “ , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 75 , . , , , „ “ , , ; , , , : , , „ “, “– . („ “ , ). .3.4.21https://petrimazepa.com/ru/dzheyms_bernkhem_kem_on_byl_i_chto_ostavil_chelovechestv u_chast_1). 7. ; , ; , ; , , , , . , , , , , . „ “ : . , ; , , : , „ “ ; : , ... Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 76 ... .. . (2016) 46; , , , ( ) – , , , , , , : “, , , ; ( , , “, . “ ), , , , ; , ; : „ , , , , , , . , , , “ (2013) https://forum.ge/?f=29&showtopic=34504502 30 , , , „ “ : –„ “ ( ) ) ; , , , „ “ Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 77 : , 90– , , 2012 , , , , „ “ , , , „ “ . , , ( , ) . , , : , , , , ; , , ( ), . ( 12.3.2023 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0135) , , ; , : , ( ), , ; , , , , , ; , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 78 , , , , , , . , ; ( , ), , . . (2016), , . ; , , , ; , , : ( ) , ; , , , , , , ; , , , , , , , , . , , ( , ) , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 79 ; : „ “ , – , : „ “ , , , ; , ; , . , , ( ) , , „ “ ( , ). ; , , . , : , ; ; , 2024 , „ “; Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 80 “ , „ “ – , ; , , ; , (800– “ ) ; , , , , , , , , , „ ,“ . , , : „ “; , , , : „ “ , ; ; , . , , , ; , , , . , , , , , , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 81 ; , , „ “ , 2050 ; , , 2022 3 213 „ 2030 “(https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/geo215987.pdf), , , : , , , , : , , , , , . , , . “ , , ; , ; , , , , , : , , , , , , ; , , ; , , , , Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 82 ; , , ( ) , , ; ; . , ; , , „ “ ; , , , , , . , , , , ; , , , , ; , . „ “ , , 2011 3000 - Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 83 , 20- 147- ( 11.1 2024 https://garibashvili.ge/ka/n/all/mtavrobis_mushaobis_2023_tslis_angarishis_tsardgena); , „ “ ( ); , ; , : World Justice Project"- , „ " , -6 ; „ " , „ " , . -20, 11- , -2 . , , 29- , -14 , - 3 ; „ " „ " 10- 179 . 11- . 180 ; „Transparency International" 2022 ", 180 41- ; (ERCAS) „ " , -17 „ " 15 4 ; „Fraser Institute"- , , „ " 165 25- ; , , 33- , , ; „Fraser Institute"- , , „ " 165 25- ; „Freedom House" „ " , 100- 76 " 70 -9 ; Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 84 - Global Risk Profile- - „ 2023" . 2 , 200 25%- , 43- ; , , , „ " ( 11.1 2024 https://garibashvili.ge/ka/n/all/mtavrobis_mushaobis_2023_tslis_angarishis_tsardgena); “ , , , , , , ; , „ “, ; , , „ “ , . : , ( ), , , ; . , ( , – „ “ , , , ), , – , ; Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 85 , , , ; „ “ (2010) 205–208; , , , , . 1. , (2009) „ “ 2009 2 (29) 2. Political games of attack and defence (2020) https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0135 3. Keith Preston (2020) : . 1.https://petrimazepa.com/ru/dzheyms_bernkhem_kem_on_byl_i_chto_ostavil_chel ovechestvu_chast_1). 4. . (2016) 5. (2013) https://forum.ge/?f=29&showtopic=34504502 6. 2030 (2022) https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/geo215987.pdf 7. (2023) . https://garibashvili.ge/ka/n/all/mtavrobis_mushaobis_2023_tslis_angarishis_tsardgena 8. (2010) Georgian Scientists/ . 6 N 1, 2024 86 „Rules of political game“ in Georgia Avtandil Tukvadze1; Elene Gelashvili2 1Doctor of political science, TSU associate professor; 2assistant professor, doctoral student Abstract “Rules of the political game” are an organic part of the domestic and foreign policy of any country, and its main goal is to gain power, expand dominance and control over resources within the country, in the international arena they mainly serve the utilitarian goals of economic development, expansion of influence, change of order; The rules of the game may be based on the norms established by international law, consistent with order and justice, or take the form of a “game without rules”, going beyond the framework of democratic constitutions; It is incorrect to evaluate the rules of the game from the standpoint of moral and ethical standards established in society, since politics is an autonomous sphere of social activity and there are certain patterns in it, which in most cases contradict the ideal principles of “fair law.” The structural elements of the rules of the political game are outwardly the same in all countries: political subjects, objects (government), methods of gaining power, methods and motives, but in content the independent component is diametrically different according to the regimes; In most cases, political motives and goals coincide. The rules of the game that have developed in Georgia are in a transitional stage, on the one hand of which there are elements of struggle characteristic of authoritarian politics, and on the other - for democracy, supporters of public, open politics; In general, liberal democratic values are gradually gaining strength, and especially the country’s acceptance of EU candidate status means strengthening the process of European integration, developing a consensus, democratic transparent policy at the domestic and international level, in which, along with the ruling party, civil society institutions and the opposition will be actively involved and business elite; In our opinion, Georgia can build democracy in an “unusual place” (Magstadt), and this is evidenced by the centuries-old traditions of tolerance, the level of education, the potential of a unique national culture, the mentality of the people, the foreign policy orientations and values of the elites. Key words: politics, rules of the game, structure, elements, opposition, non-governmental organizations, business elite, order, justice.