Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 224 Georgian Scientists Vol. 7 Issue 2, 2025 https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2025.07.02.21 ( ) 1; 2; 3, 4, 5 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; 5 , , , , . . , , , . , , . , . : , , , - , . , , , , , , , , . Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 225 . -9-12 0 C, -15-160 C - [1 - 6]. , 1979 , , ( , , ). , . , , . , [3]. , . : - , ; - (NPK) ; - , . , , 2008 . . „ “ . „ . , , , . : , , - , , , , , . Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 226 , , . 7 . , - , - . . , ( /1000 ): - 0,05-0,1-0,2, 0,025-0,05-0,1, - 0,05-0,1-0,2. , , , , , 3,25 . 100 . 1 – 4 1 - 3. , , . , . . , , . : , , N 300-400 , , P2O5150 , K2O 180 . . 1. # , % 1 4,46 2,97 6,83 14,26 100 2 N 7,2 3,6 11,6 22,4 157,1 3 P 14,5 10,5 13,9 38,9 272,7 4 K 14,8 6,3 14,5 35,6 249,6 5 PK 16,1 9,3 16,1 41,5 291,0 6 NK 7,87 5,57 8,9 23,34 156,6 7 NP 4,2 3,2 10,2 17,6 123,4 8 NPK 10,56 18,8 14,5 43,86 307,5 Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 227 2. # , % 1 4,46 2,97 6,83 14,26 35,83 2 PK- 16,1 9,3 14,4 39,9 100 3 PK+N1 26,8 22,5 40,0 88,6 222,6 4 PK+N2 29,94 26,10 34,67 90,71 227,9 5 PK+N3 24,5 15,5 38,9 78,9 198,9 , , , N2 P2 K2 . , 207,5 %- , . , , - - 5,6- , P2O5 36,6 /100 , K2O - 20,5, CaO 126,5, MgO- 62,0 /100 . 3,6, 0,25 %. . N 3-4 %- , - 0,42 %, - 1,0 %. , , . 3. # , % 1 4,46 2,97 6,83 14,26 63,84 2 NK- 7,87 5,57 8,9 22,34 100 Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 228 3 NK + P 1 23,3 12,25 18,6 54,15 242,4 4 NK + P 2 28,3 17,54 20,34 66,18 296,24 5 NK + P 3 12,27 15,7 20,25 48,15 215,85 4. # , % 1 4,46 2,97 6,83 14,26 81,03 2 NP- 4,2 3,2 10,2 17,6 100 3 NP + K1 16,8 8,67 15,97 41,4 232,23 4 NP + K2 22,67 7,5 21,34 57,51 292,7 5 NP + K3 7,07 3,05 17,14 27,3 155,12 , , , , , ) , , , , , .). NPK Agialis , , , , (Fe), (B), (Zn), (Mo) (Mn). , , , . , , PH 5,4 , KCL 4,6; 5,32 . 100 , - 7,5 /100 , - 6,0 /100 , 1,45 %, - 0,125 %. , . . : ( , 50 ). Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 229 1. NPK -13-40-13+ . NPK -20-20- 20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -6-14-35+2MgO+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -6-14-35+2MgO+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20- 20-20+ ;; NPK -13-40-13+ . 2. NPK -13-40-13+ . NPK -18-18- 18+3MgO+ ; - NPK -18-18-18+3MgO+ ; - NPK -18-18- 18+3MgO+ ; - NPK -6-14-35+2MgO+ ; - NPK -18-18- 18+3MgO+ ; - NPK -6-14-35+2MgO+ ; - NPK -18-18- 18+3MgO+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; - NPK -20-20-20+ ; NPK -13-40-13+ . 5. , ) # / % / % 1 14244,3 100 - - 2 1 18992,4 133,34 4748,1 33,3 3 2 16826,6 118,13 2582,3 18,13 6. # - - , , % - C /% - , % 1 17,1 68,5 30-40 60-75 16,2 118,0 10,7 2 1 22,8 93,3 40-50 90-100 17,0 132,5 10,95 3 2 20,2 80,2 36,40 70-86 16,8 119,7 10,82 , , ( 5 6). 33,3%- ( Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 230 2582,3 ). - 5,7-3,1 . : , , , , C, . 7. , pH - / . 100 100 % C/N H2O KCL . P2 O5 K2O C 0-15 5,2 4,5 3,2 29,3 15,6 3 12,3 4 1,53 0,12 0,89 7,2 15-30 5,8 4,9 3,38 30,5 14,3 8 9,0 1,4 0,09 0,82 9,12 30-45 5,8 5,0 3,39 38,2 13,7 5 7,5 1,23 0,08 0,72 8,78 1 0-15 5,2 4,7 2,94 28,0 19,1 3 26,0 1,63 0,17 1,53 9,0 15-30 5,2 4,8 3,08 30,0 16,2 5 21,7 5 1,53 0,10 0,89 8,48 30-45 5,32 4,8 3,38 32,0 13,7 5 19,5 1,17 0,08 0,69 8,92 2 0-15 5,7 4,9 3,54 29,5 17,5 15,0 2,24 0,14 5,13 9,04 15-30 5,8 5,0 3,43 29,0 14,3 8 15,5 1,98 0,13 1,16 8,93 30-45 5,8 5,0 3,5 30,5 13,3 8 13,5 1,72 0,11 1,0 9,09 Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 231 , . ( 7), , , , , (3,94%) , . : 1. . 2. , , . NPK Agialis , . NPK-6-14-35+2MgO+ , , . 3. „ “, . 1. . . . , #5, 1989. . 103-109. 2. . , . , . . ( ) . 2008. „ “, . 84 3. . . , . , 2003, . 63. 4. . , . . . . , #3, 1990, . 121-123. 5. . . , . . - . . , #1-4, 2007, . 45-46. Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 232 5. . , . . . . , 2015, . 408-411. 6. Ahmet Celik, Sezal Ercisili, Nihat Turcut – Some physical, pormological and nutritional properties of Kivi fruit cv Haywarel. International Journal of food sciences Nutrition. September 2007. 58 (6) 411- 418. Mineral feeding of Actinidia (kiwi) Izolda Mamulaishvili1, Vakhtang Goliadze2; David Apkhazava3; Ekaterine Gobronidze4; Ketevan Chikashua5 1Academic Doctor of Agricultural Sciences; 2Academic Doctor of Agricultural Sciences; 3Academic Doctor of Technical Sciences; 4Academic Doctor of Technical Sciences; 5Academic Doctor of Biological Sciences Institute of Subtropical Tea Grops and Tea Industry of Georgia Agrarian University Abstract The article presents the results of many years of developing a fertilization system for actinidia grown on red soil in the humid subtropical zone of Western Georgia and studying the impact of new types of complex fertilizers on the content of nutrient elements in the soil and plant, yield, and fruit quality indicators. The optimal ratio of nutrient elements in the soil has been determined under vegetation and field trials. The use of new types of complex fertilizers enhances the absorption of phosphorus from the soil by plants, increases the amount of mobile potassium, slightly changes the potential acidity of the soil, and reduces the level of soil pollution with ballast substances. The interrelationship between the main nutrient elements in the soil, which ensures increased yield and influences the structural and mechanical composition of the soil, has been studied. The optimal ratio of mineral fertilizers for young plants is double doses of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Keywords: actinidia, mineral nutrition, productivity, chemical-technological characteristics Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 233 . 1. ( , ) . 2. . 3. Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 2, 2025 234 .