Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 474 Georgian Scientists Vol. 7 Issue 4, 2025 https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2025.07.04.31 , 1, 2 1 ; 2 , , , . , . . , , , , . : , , , , , , . . , , , , . . 50%- 20-50%- 50%- Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 475 . , . , 40%- . .1. . .1. . , 2030 75% . 2050 9 , , . , , 17 169 , . 2030 . : 7 - ; , , 11 - ; , 13 - . . 2015 2030 ; 2015 UNFCCC ( Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 476 )- “ 2030 15%- . 2019-2029 ( ), .. 2020 „ “ 2021 13 “ , , 2029 30 , . , 2010 19 2010/31/EU (EPBD) 2012 25 2012/27/EU (EED). „ “. (EPBD) EPBD , , , , , . : ( , , .), , , . , , , , , , . Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 477 , , : maxUU : U – [ 2 ·K]; Umax – [ 2·K]. . , , . , , . . . . . 2022 400 . . 30 4- . ( ). 12%- . , , A, . , - , . 2018 , 2030 . 2030 70%- 2035 65%- . 2018 Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 478 . 2030 50% 2025 . 55% 2030 . , , . . . , , ) . , , . , ; - . . : ) . . 57% - ) . , , , . . Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 479 . 79 , PET 57%- . , 35% 1:4 - . . , (0,750 ) (2 ) 97,5 2 3% . . .1. , 1 - . [22] N N , % 2 % Shu-lun MAK* , Tanya Ming Yan WU, Fanny Wai Fan TANG, Jimmy Chi Ho LI and Chi Wing LAI 1 5 43.82 -11,76 2 10 40.60 -7.34 3 15 37.32 -8.06 1 5 40.50 -9,37 2 10 38.70 -7.80 3 15 36.30 -6.50 . 1. , , , , 50 . . Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 480 , , , . . 2. % Umax / 2 K 50 . 1 2 3 1 2-3 max 0.5 0.58 0.25 max 0.4 0.3 0.2 max 0.5 0.38 0.25 4,0 3,0 3,0 2,5 5-7 5.5 0.3 3,0 , . 2. Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 481 .2. .2. . - . , .2. . 1. 2. 3. . , , 0.20-0.40 0.10 . . . . 3. Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 482 .3. , 1 500 2, 3, 4- . , . . 24 . : 1. , , , , , . 2. . 3. , . 4. , , . 1.Shen, L.Y.; Lu, W.S.; Yao, H.; Wu, D.H. A computer-based scoring method for measuring the environmental performance of construction activities. Autom. Constr. 2005, 14, 297– 309. 2.Khasreen, M.M.; Banfill, P.F.G.; Menzies, G.F. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A review. Sustainability 2009, 1, 674–701. 3.Probert, A.J.; Miller, A.; Ip, K.; Beckett, K.P.; Schofield, R. Accounting for the Life Cycle Carbon Emissions of New Dwellings in the UK. In Proceedings of the 12th International Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 483 Conference on Nonconventional Materials and Technologies, Cairo, Egypt, 21–23 September 2010. 4.Eurostat. Energy, Transport and Environment Indicators; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. 5.Department of Economic and Social AffairsSustainable Development https://sdgs.un.org/goals 6. LAW OF GEORGIA ON ENEGRY EFFICIENCY. https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/4873938/0/en/pdf 7. Energy Efficiency in Georgia – The Government’s Promise https: //georgiatoday.ge/energy-efficiency-in-georgia-the-governments-promise/ 8. DIRECTIVE 2010/31/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 19 May 2010. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32010L0031 9. DIRECTIVE 2012/27/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 25 October 2012. on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1399375464230&uri=CELEX%3A3201 2L0027 10.Dinesh S; Dinesh A; and Kirubhakaran K., “Utilisation of Waste Plastic in Manufacturing of Bricks and Paver Blocks” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol.2 (4), pp. 364-368. 11.. Nitin Goyal ; Manisha., “Constructing structures using eco-bricks”, Internatonal Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research, Vol.2(4), pp. 159-164. 12. Maneeth P D; Pramod K; Kishor Kumar; and Shanmukha Shetty., “Utilization of Waste Plastic in Manufacturing of PlasticSoil Bricks” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol.3 (8), pp.529-536. 13. EU PLASTICS STRATEGY - COMMITMENT & PLEDGE. PETCORE EUROPE. 14. Plastics waste trade and the environment. EIONET Report – ETC/ WMGE 2019/5. European Environment Agency. Retrieved from https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc- wmge/products/etc-reports/plasticswaste-trade-and-the-environment 2 EEA (2019). 15. The plastic waste trade in the circular economy. European Environment Agency. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/waste/resource-efficiency/the-plastic- waste-trade-in 3 Miller, S.; Bolger, M.; and Copello, L. (2019). 16.Reusable solutions: how governments can help stop single use plastic pollution. 3Keel, Oxford, United Kingdom. A study by the Rethink Plastic Alliance and the Break Free From Plastic Movement. Retrieved from https://rethinkplasticalliance.eu/wp- content/uploads/2019/10/bffp_rpa_reusable_solutions_report.pdf 17.The National Center for Biotechnology Information advances scienceUsing Waste Plastics as Asphalt Modifier: Review. 2021 Dec 24; 15(1):110. doi: 10.3390/ma15010110. 18.Yusof, N. Z. (2018). Plastic in Brick Application. Trends in Civil Engineering and Its Architecture, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32474/tceia.2018.03.000152 Georgian Scientists/ . 7 N 4, 2025 484 19.Shrestha, M. N., Kandel, J., KC, P., Bhatta, A., Paudyal, S., Adhikari, B. P., & Poudel, A. (2023). A Review of Plastic Bricks as a Construction Material. OCEM Journal of Management, Technology & Social Sciences, 2(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.3126/ocemjmtss.v2i2.54232 20.Al-Sinan, M. A., & Bubshait, A. A. (2022). Using Plastic Sand as a Construction Material toward circular Economy: A Review. Sustainability, 14(11), 6446. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116446 21.Belay Wendimu, T., Neguse Furgasa, B., & Mohammed Hajji, B. (2021). Suitability and Utilization Study on Waste Plastic Brick as Alternative Construction Material. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210601.12 22.Mak, S.-L., Wu, T. M. Y., Tang, F. W. F., Li, J. C. H., & Lai, C. W. (2021). A Review on Utilization of Plastic Wastes in Making Construction Bricks. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 706(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/706/1/012001 Challenges and Opportunities for Ensuring Environmental Protection Requirements Abstract The article discusses forms of environmental damage caused by construction, Georgia's commitments to reduce construction-related environmental damage, and legislative requirements. It provides information on current and expected consequences caused by plastic as one of the major environmental pollutants. The existing practice of using plastic as a construction raw material has been discussed. The article describes an experimental stand used to conduct research on optimal proportions for producing an energy-efficient block that meets regulatory requirements, using plastic and local raw materials. Keywords: environmental pollution, plastic, construction block, energy efficiency, heat transfer, strength,