1 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 ABSTRACT The modern (Holocene-age) Great Salt Lake (GSL) and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville of the Bonneville Ba- sin (BB) together make a geosite (GSL-BB system) of exceptional scientific, cultural, aesthetic, and societal value. GSL is the largest saline lake in the Western Hemisphere and a sensitive recorder of climate. For mil- lennia, this distinctive salty water body has been a dynamic and complex natural ecosystem, including an im- portant waterway for birds and other wildlife and an archive of environmental change and history. Lake Bonneville is a seminal part of the history of science in the United States through the work of G.K. Gilbert, who in the 1870s and 1880s developed both critical scientific concepts (e.g., isostasy) and methods (e.g., mul- tiple working hypotheses), which are still employed today. GSL is a major tourist attraction, an economic driv- er, and a place of scientific exploration. Yet today, the GSL is in grave danger of near total desiccation due to a combination of factors: human removal of waters that would normally replenish the lake, climate change, and other environmental pressures. Over the past few decades there has been a growing international movement to recognize and respect our geoheritage, by raising visibility and protection of high-priority geosites. The GSL- BB system is a geoheritage site that urgently needs our protection. The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System: Conserving our Geoheritage for Future Generations Marjorie A. Chan1, Charles G. Oviatt2, Bonnie K. Baxter3, Basil Tikoff4, and Genevieve Atwood5 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, marjorie.chan@utah.edu 2Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 3Great Salt Lake Institute, Westminster University, Salt Lake City, Utah 4Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 5Earth Science Education, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah GEOHERITAGE CONCEPT An International Movement Over several decades, a growing international ge- oconservation movement recognizes that exceptional geological sites need to be protected and managed as part of our geoheritage. The Geological Society of America Position Statement (Geological Society of America, 2022) defines geoheritage sites as areas with geologic features of significant scientific, educa- tional, cultural, and/or aesthetic value. These sites are key to advancing knowledge and support the broad understanding of the environment, its geodiversity and biodiversity, and the factors that influence cli- mate change (see America’s Geoheritage II workshop proceedings, 2021 https://nap.edu/26316). Although biodiversity is notably visible to the public, the geo- logic setting – its geodiversity and the convergence of geographic to environmental conditions – commonly form the underpinnings and context for biodiversity. The extensive and rapidly expanding body of litera- ture on geoheritage is too extensive to detail here (e.g., see summaries of Brilha, 2015, 2018; Reynard and Brilha, 2018; Brilha and others, 2018). The United States is endowed with many sites that embody a rich geoheritage. The U.S. and State Park systems have had an important impact on the conser- vation movement, but there has been growing recog- nition for more coordinated global recognition of nat- ural sites. Thus, geoheritage calls for global commu- nication and cooperation, and provides the context that covers much of the science and education related to important geosites, while also embracing ethics, outreach, inclusivity, protection, and management. Geoheritage also relies on modern technology to un- derstand and model how natural systems are impact- ed. As Earth scientists, we understand Earth systems, with their change and interrelationships, and feed- backs in time and space. We must be caretakers and advocates for GSL, as we have both the knowledge and responsibility to help balance nature and societal needs. Geosite Locality In the Basin and Range province, ancient Lake Bonneville (Figure 1A) covered much of western Utah during the last glacial maximum. The modern GSL (Figs. 1B, C) is the recent version of the closed- basin GSL-BB system, which, during the past few 10.31711/ugap.v51i.132 https://nap.edu/26316 2 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System million years, has been dominated by various saline to hypersaline lakes similar to Holocene GSL. Be- tween 30,000 and 13,000 yr BP the lake system was deeper and more extensive (Lake Bonneville) and was dominated by freshwater (Figure 1D, Currey and others, 1984). There is much interest in the GSL as shown by the considerable literature covering more than a century, including this volume (also see Gil- bert, 1886, 1890; Oviatt and Shroder, 2016a). The significant runoff that resulted from the wet winter of 2022-2023, does not significantly ameliorate the long -term decline in water level of the GSL. For centuries, GSL has been the largest saline lake in the Western Hemisphere, recording a history of change (Madsen, B.D., 1989; Gwynn, 2002a). But now in the Anthropocene, drying of GSL (Figs. 1B, C) and the probability of it disappearing, leaving be- hind a bowl of toxic dust with a few pools of salty water, has understandably raised alarm (e.g., Flavelle, 2022). With growing pressures of urbanization in Utah, the geologic features in Antelope Island State Park in Davis County, Utah, provides one of the few sites left to easily access the GSL and see the context of its history over millennia, including the cyclic rises and falls of GSL and Lake Bonneville. This paper fo- cuses on the broad spectrum and overview of geoher- itage values and why it is important to protect the GSL. GEOHERITAGE VALUES Cultural and Historical Value The GSL-BB system has significant cultural as well as historical value because of the role that the landscape played for indigenous peoples as well as in the subsequent exploration of the west by European Americans. Humans have occupied the Great Basin for thousands of years. Native American tribes that have lived in the GSL region, and that are still an im- portant presence, include the Western Shoshone, Goshute, Ute, Paiute, and Washoe peoples (National Park Service, 2015). The landscape was a vital re- source where native people hunted and gathered for sustenance, and the GSL watershed provided an ex- ceptional bounty (e.g., Madsen, D.B, 1989). Today many tribal descendants feel an important connection to the land, particularly where open spaces retain much of their original, natural expression. In the 19th century with expansion and exploration of the west by European Americans (e.g., Stegner, 1954), early scientific studies included the documen- tation of Lake Bonneville, based on studies of its shorelines, deltas, and sediments by renowned Ameri- can geologist G. K. Gilbert (1886, 1890). His careful studies on foot and horseback allowed him to deduce that valley floors were previously covered by water and the isolated mountain ranges had been islands and peninsulas in a Pleistocene water body he named “Lake Bonneville.” Gilbert used the Bonneville basin to investigate the idea of isostasy (equilibrium adjust- ments of Earth’s crust to changing distributions of weight at the surface, in this case the growth and eventual loss of the water load of Lake Bonneville). Individual shorelines of Lake Bonneville vary in ele- vation with the highest elevations occurring where the lake was deepest (the weight of the water in the lake depressed the underlying crust, and when the water evaporated, the crust rebounded). This work was the case example for Gilbert to illustrate the methodology of multiple working hypotheses to overcome bias in human reasoning (Gilbert, 1886). His recognition of the dynamic equilibrium of landforms and his correla- tion of shoreline elevations was seminal to under- standing the complex interplay of isostasy and basin tectonics. Gilbert identified and quantified evidence of shoreline superelevation and effects of fetch on shoreline elevations of GSL and Lake Bonneville. Be- cause of Gilbert’s work, the GSL-BB system repre- sents a seminal part of the history of science in Amer- ica. Gilbert used his experiences in this basin to un- derstand distinctive shoreline barriers, terraces, and spits, and he chronicled the causal changes in hydrol- ogy based on rises and falls of Lake Bonneville and the highstands of GSL during the 1870s compared to falling levels of GSL during the 1880s. Remarkably, Gilbert’s seminal work has been an inspiration to peo- ple all over the world who have studied the history of closed-basin lakes. To be able to retrace Gilbert’s thoughts and walk in his footsteps has deep meaning for those who value historical significance. Many Bonneville shorelines are now being rapidly lost or covered due to urbanization, but Antelope Island State Park preserves near-pristine records of these an- cient shorelines. Scientific and Educational Value The GSL-BB system encompasses a rich geoherit- age (Figure 2) and contains many classic textbook ge- ologic features and landscapes, that are significant to both education and research. Much of the specific sci- ence is detailed in other papers of this volume. Geomorphology and Ice Age History The geoheritage value of the Bonneville basin’s prominent ice-age landforms is explained in more de- tail in other publications (Chan and Currey 2001; 3 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 Figure 1. The GSL-BB system. A. Location of GSL and Lake Bonneville in western Utah. B. Overview map of GSL showing the historic average elevation, and the new 2022 historic low (Figure from Clark and Baxter, 2023.) C. Corresponding Landsat satellite imagery of GSL elevations showing the record high of GSL in 1986 at left vs. historic low in 2022. AI = Antelope Island. Images (Images are public domain.) D. Known Bonneville basin lake cycles. The blue line labeled B in the main graph marks the Bonneville deep-lake cycle. Vertical black bars represent older deep-lake cycles. The base of the main graph is the elevation of modern GSL. Inset shows the shoreline history of Lake Bonneville (blue) and GSL (red) with named shorelines (also see Figure 3). (Inset figure from Oviatt and Shroder, 2016a). 4 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System Figure 2. The GSL-BB system has many geoheritage values including historical, scientific, educational, aesthetic, economic, and societal. A. Polygonal cracks south of Gunnison Island. B. Colorful imagery at Antelope Island. C. GSL lies at the intersection of urban and natural settings (Antelope Island looking east, herd of antelope in the foreground). GSL is a major attraction that draws tourists. GSL enhances the quali- ty of life in the Salt Lake Valley. Images: J. Long. 5 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 Chan and others, 2003; Chan and Godsey, 2004, 2016). Since Lake Bonneville was the largest pluvial lake in the Western Hemisphere (that is, it was caused by climate change and an increase in effective mois- ture in the basin and was not fed by glacial meltwa- ter), it is a natural laboratory for study (Figure 3), bol- stered by the well-dated shorelines that provide a pre- cise lake hydrograph linked to Pleistocene climate change. Study of the GSL-BB has unparalleled analog value for many other large lake systems. The varied character of the lake is a result of climate change in the basin, causing the lake to range from small and hypersaline to large and nearly fresh. Because the ba- sin is so big and deep relative to the amount of water that enters the system, the lake has remained hydro- graphically closed for most of its history. Connecting Lake Bonneville and GSL to lakes farther back into the Pleistocene, subsurface cores like the Burmester core (Eardley and others, 1973; Oviatt and others, 1999), tell the story of only four deep-lake cycles during the past 800,000 years. Lake Bonneville was the most recent of those deep-lake cy- cles, and the deepest because it had the benefit of in- put from the upper Bear River and rivers in Cache Valley, which were diverted into the basin after 50,000 yr BP. All together those four deep-lake cy- cles took up less than 10% of the past 800,000 yr — the rest of the time the lake was shallow, similar to the historic GSL (Oviatt and Shroder, 2016b). Prior to 800,000 yr BP, the lake system stayed at low levels back to about 3 million years ago. Thus, other than the four deep-lake cycles, the history of the GSL-BB system indicates that our modern view of GSL is typi- cal of the past few millions of years — a shallow hypersaline lake in a desert environment. The combination of geomorphic and the sediment records are valuable analogs for other large lake stud- ies, in part because the record in the GSL-BB system is so intact, with distinctive markers of change over documentable spatial and temporal scales. The land- scape expressions are also analogs to understanding geologic processes and applying them to regions of Mars (e.g., Chan and others, 2016). GSL Ooids GSL is known as the world’s largest lacustrine carbonate depositional system (Baskin and others, 2022). Distinctive carbonate ooids (Figure 4) — coat- ed grains formed where waves agitate the lake bottom sediment — of GSL are long-standing world class ex- amples. These sand-size features form when fine- grained particles, such as brine-shrimp pellets or tiny sand grains, become coated with successive thin, con- centric layers of calcium-carbonate crystals (crystals of the mineral aragonite arranged radially outward from the center of the ooid; e.g., Sandberg, 1975; Fig- ure 4A). Recent work of Lincoln and others (2022) suggests that the radial pattern is derived from recrys- tallization. The GSL ooids contrast with other classic examples, such as Bahamian ooids that have calcium carbonate crystals arranged parallel to the grain coat- ings rather than radially. Oolitic sand is commonly cemented into beachrock (Figure 4B), which is an in- dicator of lithification along older shorelines, with ce- mentation aided by microbial activity (Lincoln and others, 2022). Microbialites Microbialites are organo-sedimentary mounds formed by the actions of complex microbial mats (Burne and Moore, 1987; Lindsay and others, 2017), and GSL has an extensive distribution in the high- salinity water (Baskin and others, 2022; Carney and Vanden Berg, 2022; Pedone and others, 2023). Photo- synthesis by cyanobacteria and sulfate metabolism by other microorganisms create conditions that precipi- tate calcium carbonate (Burne and Moore 1987). In addition, the extra-polymeric substance (EPS; a term commonly used by people who study microbialites) secreted by the cyanobacteria trap carbonate sedi- ment, which creates a substrate on which new mats grow toward sunlight, hence the mound shape. Some microbialites follow older polygonal crack patterns (Figure 4), possibly because they are texturally differ- ent sites that might enhance biomediated growth, but microbialites also occur as individual mound buildups (Figure 5) up to 1.5 m high that cover as much as a quarter of the lake floor (Chidsey and others, 2015; Vanden Berg, 2019; Baskin and others, 2022; Wilcock and others, 2024). Microbialite growth is sensitive to water chemis- try and depth (light), wave energy, substrate, and oth- er environmental factors (Kanik and others, 2020). Cyanobacteria-based mats represent the earliest fos- silized life form on Earth; layered and mounded accu- mulations of microbialites are well-preserved in car- bonate rocks in the geologic record. The longevity and adaptability of microbialites accounts for their distribution on our planet in modern extreme environ- ments, such as GSL. The study of GSL microbialites has implications for the search for biosignatures on Mars (Noffke, 2015; Chan and others, 2019; Gill and others, 2023). Mineralogy and Mirabilite Evaporite minerals such as halite (NaCl) have a long history of being extracted from GSL waters 6 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System (Gwynn, 2002b). Additionally, unusual cold-water, saline-lake minerals, such as mirabilite (hydrated so- dium sulfate, Na2SO4•10H2O, also known as Glau- ber’s salt), occur in spring mounds that are visible during winter months (Figure 6). Groundwater seems to be partially dissolving a subsurface mirabilite layer, and then the mirabilite minerals are reprecipitated at the sur- face where spring water emerges. Once the sodium- sulfate-rich spring water hits the cold winter air, mira- bilite crystals form and build up a collection of small, mounded terraces, with beautiful crystals (Figure 6) that are stable only in sub-freezing dry environments. Some of the mirabilite-rich springs have colorful pools that are being studied for the associated microbial life (e.g., Jagniecki and others, 2021; Gill and others, 2023). These unusual mineralogies have implications for astrobiology and understanding life in extreme en- vironments. Figure 3. Shorelines of Lake Bonneville in Antelope Island State Park preserved at White Rock Bay and superim- posed on the mountain bedrock. The landforms are a valuable record of geologic history and climate change. A. Prominent shorelines (photo taken in 2014): S = Stansbury shoreline, B = Bonneville shoreline, P = Provo shoreline. B. Many shorelines formed during the rising and falling phases of Lake Bonneville, here showing well- preserved examples between the Stansbury and Provo shorelines on this hillside; GSL at far right (barely in sight; photo taken in 2012). Images: M. Chan. 7 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 Ecosystem Significance GSL is a delicately balanced ecosystem (Figure 7). The extreme conditions of GSL gives rise to a rich biodiversity and a special set of lifeforms, includ- ing brine shrimp and brine flies and the microorgan- isms that feed them, which have implications for un- derstanding life adaptations in extreme environments (Baxter and Butler, 2020). The GSL provides im- portant food and shelter to over 10 million migrating birds (Sorenson and others, 2020; GSLEP, 2022), in addition to generating billions of dollars in revenue from tourism and the brine-shrimp industry (Bioeconomics, 2012). Life on Earth needs water, yet water in the GSL watershed has been extracted and diverted for many purposes, such as for growing alfalfa and building housing subdivisions and supporting infrastructure. This has significantly impacted the inflow and replen- ishment of the lake, which has been drying and could Figure 4. Distinctive GSL features from the north side of Antelope Island that have scientific value. A. Loose spheroidal oolitic sand (mostly ~ 0.2 to 0.5 mm diameter) with scattered weathered siliciclastic granules derived from nearby bedrock expo- sures; diagrammatic inset shows GSL radial structure of GSL ooids vs. the common marine tangential structure exemplified in Bahama ooids. B. Cemented beachrock composed of oolitic sand. Images from Bridger Bay, Antelope Island, M. Chan. 8 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System potentially leave a basin of toxic dust that could im- pact regional communities (Flavelle, 2022). Declining GSL water levels threaten economic activity, public health in adjacent communities and ecosystems of GSL (Larsen, 2022; Great Salt Lake Strike Team re- port, 2023). It is clear that strategies to improve water management and increase deliveries to the lake are critical. GSL is an extreme ecosystem of biodiversity and geodiversity that is too important to lose. Societal Value There is no doubt that the GSL and the Bonneville Basin comprise an aesthetical geoheritage landscape that is visually appealing and that inspires a sense of awe and wonder (Figure 8). The landscape of GSL, enhanced by open space and the natural setting of flo- ra and fauna, has cultural and historical roots, and im- pacts economic development and tourism as well as quality of life. Shrinking water levels of GSL have put this ecosystem into a state of crisis. Diminishment of the GSL will threaten wildlife and further degrade Utah’s air quality. Society needs geoheritage sites like GSL because these sites are critical to advancing knowledge about water, climate and environmental changes, evolution of life, minerals and resources, and other aspects of the nature and history of Earth (Geological Society of America, 2022). Numerous studies show that nature and the outdoors provide positive impacts on mental health and cognition (e.g., Bratman and others, 2019; Weir, 2020). GSL is an outdoor classroom that en- hances public understanding and engagement with science (Figure 8), while providing recreational areas that improve quality of life, as well as economic sup- port to local and regional communities as tourist des- tinations and as vital mineral and water resources. CONCLUSIONS Drying of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville, which ended about 13,000 years ago, left both ancient shore- Figure 5. Microbial mounds of GSL at Bridger Bay, Antelope Island State Park have important implications for understanding early life, with applications to astrobiology. A. and B. buildups; C. and D. cyanobacteria growth holding together oolitic sand grains, with some elongate brine-fly pupae cases. Images A, B: B. Bax- ter. Images C, D: M. Chan. 9 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 lines and the modern GSL, the largest saline lake in the Western Hemisphere. This GSL-BB system, as a whole, is a unique and valuable geoheritage archive of climate change and an extreme ecosystem that is often underappreciated and is now under threat of be- ing lost. The GSL-BB hosts world class examples of landforms related to climate history, ooids, micro- bialite mounds, and evaporite minerals (e.g., halite and mirabilite). The microbialite and mirabilite fea- tures have implications for astrobiology and under- standing life in extreme environments. Specifically, geoheritage sites like GSL are critical to the geosci- ence profession, to conserve sites of geoscience im- portance related to Earth processes, Earth history, and history of geologic thought. These sites are the train- ing ground for the next generation of environmental scientists who will grapple with global societal issues and the complexities and balance of nature. The bio- diversity and geodiversity of GSL and the Bonneville Basin make this a remarkable geoheritage jewel of Utah’s west desert. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge professional photog- rapher Joel Long for use of his Great Salt Lake imag- es, and reviewers Mark Milligan and Thomas Casade- vall. Figure 6. Mirabilite mounds and terrace structures (A, B), with large, cm+ scale crystals growing in cold colorful pools (C, D - colored green by cyanobacteria) at White Rock Bay, Antelope Island State Park. These mineralogies have im- portant implications for life in extreme environments. Winter images (2020): A-C: M. Chan. Image D: D. Eby. 10 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System Figure 7. GSL is a delicately balanced ecosystem. Waterfowl at Farmington Bay Wildlife Refuge on the east- ern edge of GSL include migratory populations of Tundra Swans (A) and Phalaropes (B). C: a male GSL brine shrimp with impressive claspers; brine shrimp produce eggs/cysts that are harvested from the lake and sold in aquaculture shops (e.g., fish food), and they provide food for migratory birds. D: Brine-fly detritus, including pupae cases along the beach of Bridger Bay, Antelope Island State Park. Images A, B: J. Long. C: Bridget Dopp. D: M. Chan. 11 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 REFERENCES America’s Geoheritage II, 2021, America’s Geoherit- age II: Identifying, developing, and preserving America’s natural legacy, Proceedings of a work- shop: U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engi- neering, and Medicine. https://nap.edu/26316 Baskin, R. L., Della Porta, G., & Wright, V. P., 2022, Characteristics and controls on the dis- tribution of sublittoral microbial bioherms in Great Salt Lake, Utah: Implications for under- standing microbialite development: The Depo- sitional Record, v. 8 no. 1, p. 39-66. Baxter, B.K. and Butler, J.K., editors, 2020, Great Salt Lake Biology: A Terminal Lake in a Time of Change: Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 537 p. Bioeconomics, 2012, Economic Significance of the Great Salt Lake to the State of Utah. Accessed Feb- Figure 8. GSL is an outdoor laboratory for science, enjoyment of nature, and societal quality of life. Tour- ists and residents alike find refreshment and a sense of wonder and learning at GSL, Bridger Bay, and An- telope Island State Park. The Stansbury shoreline is visible on the slopes of Buffalo Point in the back- ground in A. Many people enjoy GSL (B, C) year-round. Image A: M. Chan. B, C: J. Long. https://nap.edu/26316 12 M.A. Chan, C.G. Oviatt, B.K. Baxter, B. Tikoff, and G. Atwood The Holocene Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville System ruary 14, 2023: https://deq.utah.gov/great-salt-lake- advisory-council/activities-great-salt-lake- advisory-council Bratman, G.N., Anderson, C.B., Berman, M.G., Cochran, B., De Vries, S., Flanders, J., Folke, C., Frumkin, H., Gross, J.J., Hartig, T. and Kahn Jr, P.H., 2019, Nature and mental health: An ecosys- tem service perspective: Science advances v. 5, no. 7, p.eaax0903. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903 Brilha, J., 2015, Inventory and quantitative assess- ment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review: Geoheritage, v. 1, p. 1867–2477. Brilha, J., 2018, Geoheritage: inventories and evalua- tion, in Reynard, E., and Brilha, J., editors, Geoher- itage: Elsevier, p. 69-85. Brilha, J., Gray, M., Pereira, D.I. and Pereira, P., 2018. Geodiversity: An integrative review as a con- tribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature: Environmental Science & Policy, v. 86, p.19-28. Burne, R.V., Moore, L.S., 1987, Microbialites: orga- nosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial com- munities: Palaios, v. 2, no. 3, p. 241–254. Carney, S., and Vanden Berg, M.D., 2022, Geosites: Microbialities of Bridger Bay, Antelope Island, Great Salt Lake: Utah Geological Survey Notes, v. 54, n. 1. https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey- notes/geosights/geosights-microbialites-of-bridger- bay-antelope-island-great-salt-lake/ Chan, M. A., and Currey, D. R., 2001, Geoantiquities: Earth History in the Urban Landscape: Utah Geo- logical Survey Notes, v. 33, n. 1, p. 8. Chan, M.A., and Godsey, H., 2004, Geoantiquities: Concepts and applications for education in the ur- ban landscape: Journal of Geological Education v. 52, p. 445-452. http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/ab- stracts/nov04.html Chan, M.A., Currey, D.R., Dion, A. and Godsey, H., 2003, Geoantiquities – in the urban landscape (Chapter 2): in Heiken, Fakundiny, G.R., and Sut- ter, J., editors, Earth Science in the City: A Reader: American Geophysical Union monograph. ISBN 0- 87590-299-5, p. 21-42. Chan, M.A. Godsey, H.S., 2016, Lake Bonneville ge- osites in the urban landscape: Potential loss of geo- logical heritage (Ch. 23): in Oviatt, C.G., and Shroder, J.F., editors, Lake Bonneville: A Scien- tific Update, Elsevier, p. 617- 633. Chan, M. A., Hinman, N. W., Potter-McIntyre, S. L., Schubert, K. E., Gillams, R. J., Awramik, S. M., Boston, P. J., Bower, D. M., Des Marais, D. J., Farmer, J., Jia, T. Z., King, P. L., Hazen, R. M., Léveillé, R. J., Papineau, D., Rempfert, K. R., Sánchez-Román, M., Spear, J. R., Southam, G., Stern, J.C., and Cleaves, H. J., 2019, Deciphering biosignatures in planetary contexts: Astrobiology, v. 19, no. 9, p. 1075-1102. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1903 Chan, M.A., Jewell, P.W., Parker, T., Okubo, C., Or- mo, J., and Komatsu, G., 2016, Pleistocene Lake Bonneville as an analog for extraterrestrial lakes and oceans: in Oviatt, C.G., and Shroder, J.F., edi- tors, Lake Bonneville: A Scientific Update, Else- vier, p. 571-597. Chidsey, T.C.J., Vanden Berg, M.D., and Eby, D.E., 2015, Petrography and characterization of microbi- al carbonates and associated facies from modern Great Salt Lake and Uinta Basin’s Eocene Green River Formation in Utah, USA, in Microbial Car- bonates in Space and Time: Implications for Global Exploration and Production: Geological Society of London Special Publication, v. 418, p. 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP418 Clark, D.L., and Baxter, B.K., 2023, Great Salt Lake’s Gunnison and Cub Islands come into focus: Utah Geological Survey Notes, January 2023, https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/gsl- gunnison-cub-islands/ Currey, D.R., Atwood, G., Mabey, D.R., 1984, Major levels of Great Salt Lake and Lake Bonneville: Utah Geological Mineral Survey Map 73. Eardley, A.J., Shuey, R.T., Gvosdetsky, V., Nash, W.P., Picard, M.D., Grey, D.C, and Kukla, G.J., 1973, Lake cycles in the Bonneville basin, Utah: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 84, p. 211-216. Flavelle, C., 2022, As the Great Salt Lake dries up, Utah faces an “environmental nuclear bomb”: New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/07/climate/salt- lake-city-climate-disaster.html (accessed Feb. 2023) Geological Society of America, 2022, Geoheritage Position Statement: https://www.geosociety.org/gsa/positions/position2 0.aspx (accessed Feb. 2023) Gilbert, G.K., 1886, The inculcation of scientific method by example, with an illustration drawn from the Quaternary geology of Utah: American Journal of Science, v. 31, no. 184, p. 284-300. Gilbert, G.K., 1890, Lake Bonneville: U.S. Geologi- cal Survey Monograph 1, 438 p. Gill, K.K., Jagniecki, E.A., Benison, K.C., and Gib- son, M.E., 2023, A Mars-analog sulfate mineral, mirabilite, preserves biosignatures: Geology, doi:10.1130/G51256.1. Great Salt Lake Strike Team report, 2023, A synthe- sized resource document for the 2023 Utah General Legislative Session (February 8, 2023) https://www.scribd.com/document/624426841/GS- FinalAssess-v27-4# (accessed Feb. 2023) GSLEP, 2022, Great Salt Lake Ecosystem Program: https://deq.utah.gov/great-salt-lake-advisory-council/activities-great-salt-lake-advisory-council https://deq.utah.gov/great-salt-lake-advisory-council/activities-great-salt-lake-advisory-council https://deq.utah.gov/great-salt-lake-advisory-council/activities-great-salt-lake-advisory-council https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903 https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/geosights/geosights-microbialites-of-bridger-bay-antelope-island-great-salt-lake/ https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/geosights/geosights-microbialites-of-bridger-bay-antelope-island-great-salt-lake/ https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/geosights/geosights-microbialites-of-bridger-bay-antelope-island-great-salt-lake/ http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/nov04.html http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/ab-%20stracts/nov04.html https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1903 https://doi.org/10.1144/SP418 https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/gsl-gunnison-cub-islands/ https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/gsl-gunnison-cub-islands/ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/07/climate/salt-lake-city-climate-disaster.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/07/climate/salt-lake-city-climate-disaster.html https://www.geosociety.org/gsa/positions/position20 https://www.geosociety.org/gsa/positions/position20 https://www.scribd.com/document/624426841/GSL-FinalAssess-v27-4 https://www.scribd.com/document/624426841/GSL-FinalAssess-v27-4 13 M.D. Vanden Berg, R. Ford, C. Frantz, H. Hurlow, K. Gunderson, G. Atwood, editors 2024 Utah Geological Association Publication 51 Birds of Great Salt Lake: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, https://wildlife.utah.gov/gslep/wildlife/birds.html (accessed Feb. 2023) Gwynn, J.W., editor, 2002a, Great Salt Lake: An overview of change: Utah Geological Survey, Spe- cial Publication of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, 584 p. Gwynn, J.W., 2002b, The extraction of mineral re- sources from Great Salt Lake, Utah: History, devel- opmental milestones, and factors influencing salt extraction, in Gwynn, J.W., editor, Great Salt Lake: An overview of change: Utah Geological Survey, Special Publication of the Utah Department of Nat- ural Resources, 584 p. Jagniecki, E., Rupke, A., Kirby, S. and Inkenbradt, 2021, Salt crust, brine, and marginal groundwater of Great Salt Lake’s North Arm (2019 to 2021): Utah Geological Survey Report of Investigation 283, Utah Department of Natural Resources, 44 p. Kanik, M., Munro-Ehrlich, M., Fernandes-Martins, M.C., Payne, D., Gianoulias, K., Keller, L., Ku- backi, A., Lindsay, M.R., Baxter, B.K., Vanden Berg, M.D. and Colman, D.R., 2020, Unexpected abundance and diversity of phototrophs in mats from morphologically variable microbialites in Great Salt Lake, Utah: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 86, no. 10, p. e00165-20. Larsen, L., 2022, The Great Salt Lake’s ecological collapse has begun: Salt Lake Tribune https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2022/11/ 08/great-salt-lakes-ecological/ (accessed Feb. 2023). Lincoln, T.A., Webb, S.M., Present, T.M., Magyar, J.S., and Trower, E.J., 2022, Microbial activity and neomorphism influence the composition and micro- fabric of ooids from Great Salt Lake, UT: The Sedi- mentary Record, v. 20, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.2110/001c.56183 Lindsay, M.R., Anderson, C., Fox, N., Scofield, G., Allen, J., Anderson, E., Bueter, L., Poudel, S., Sutherland, K., Munson-McGee, J.H., Van Nos- trand, J.D., Zhou, J., Spear, J.R., Baxter, B.K., Lageson, D.R., Boyd, E.S., 2017, Microbialite re- sponse to an anthropogenic salinity gradient in Great Salt Lake, Utah: Geobiology, v. 15, no. 1, p. 131–145. Madsen, D.B., 1989, A grasshopper in every pot: Nat- ural History, v. 7, p. 22-25. Madsen, B.D., editor, 1989, Exploring the Great Salt Lake: The Stansbury Expedition of 1849-50: Uni- versity of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah, 889 p. National Park Service, 2015, Historic tribes of the Great Basin, https://www.nps.gov/grba/learn/hi- storyculture/historic-tribes-of-the-great-basin.htm (accessed Feb. 2023) Noffke, N., 2015, Ancient sedimentary structures in the < 3.7 Ga Gillespie Lake Member, Mars, that re- semble macroscopic morphology, spatial associa- tions, and temporal succession in terrestrial micro- bialites. Astrobiology, v. 15, no. 2, p.169-192. Oviatt, C.G., and Shroder, J.F., Jr., editors, 2016a, Lake Bonneville: A Scientific Update, Elsevier, 696 p. Oviatt, C.G., and Shroder, J.F., Jr., 2016b, Introduc- tion in Oviatt, C.G., and Shroder, J.F., Jr., editors, Lake Bonneville: A Scientific Update, Elsevier N.Y., p. xxv-xxxvi. Oviatt, C. G., Thompson, R. S., Kaufman, D. S., Bright, J., and Forester, R. M., 1999, Reinterpreta- tion of the Burmester core, Bonneville basin, Utah: Quaternary Research, v. 52, p. 180-184. Pedone, V.A., Oviatt, C.G., and McGee, D., 2023, Late Quaternary carbonate microbialite complex on the west shore of Great Salt Lake Utah, USA: Jour- nal of Quaternary Science, v. 38, no. 3, p. 319-332. Reynard, E., and Brilha, J., 2018, Geoheritage: As- sessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier, 482 p. Sandberg, P.A., 1975, New interpretations of Great Salt Lake ooids of ancient non-skeletal carbonate mineralogy: Sedimentology, v. 22, p. 497-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1975.tb00244.x Stegner, W., 1954, Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West: Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 438 p. Vanden Berg, M.D., 2019, Domes, rings, ridges, and polygons: Characteristics of microbialites from Utah’s Great Salt Lake: Sedimentary Record, v. 17, no. 1, p. 4–10. Weir, K., 2020, Nurtured by nature: American Psy- chological Association, v. 51, p. 50. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2020/04/nurtured- nature Wilcock, L., Frantz, C.M., and Vanden Berg, M.D., 2024, Use of remote imagery to map microbialite distribution at Great Salt Lake, Utah: Implications for microbialite exposure, in Vanden Berg, M.D., Ford, R., Frantz, C. Hurlow, H., Gunderson, K., and Atwood, G. (eds.), Great Salt Lake and the Bonneville Basin: Geologic History and Anthropocene Issues: Utah Geological Association Publication 51. https://wildlife.utah.gov/gslep/wildlife/birds.html https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2022/11/08/great-salt-lakes-ecological/ https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2022/11/08/great-salt-lakes-ecological/ https://doi.org/10.2110/001c.56183 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1975.tb00244.x