Available online at :  http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/gjik 

Gladi : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan 13 (04) 2022, 400-416 

Permalink/DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.134.05 
 
 

EVALUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 

ANEMON DIVE CLUB 
 

 

    Noprian Tri Handoko,1Achmad Sofiyan Hanif1,Yasep Setiakarnawijaya1 

 

 
1Physical Education, Postgraduate Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Universitas Negeri Jakarta complex Jl. 

Rawamangun Muka east Jakarta Indonesia 13320 

 

Corresponding Email: handokotri306@gmail.com 

 

Abstract 

This study aims to evaluate the coaching program of the Anemon Dive Club, which is a sports association 

that fosters and develops swimming sports in Indonesia. In this evaluation, the study used a survey method 

using the CIPP model, namely, Context, Input, Process, Product. From the results of this study it is 

concluded that: the context stage, the Anemon Dive Club coaching program is considered very good, the 

implementation carried out is according to the Vision and Mission. Then the Goals and Strategic Plans 

serve as guidelines and references in the implementation of the Anemone Dive Club program. The input 

stage, which involves association performance, coaching and training programs, athletes, the availability 

of coaches, infrastructure and funding sources is considered Very Good, which is 83.5%. The process stage 

includes the implementation of the coaching program and the effectiveness of the program implementation 

is considered good, with an average rating of 82.98%. The last stage, namely the stage of the product being 

evaluated is the achievement of targets regarding the assessment of the pattern of coaching carried out. 

Then the next achievement in the academic field by participating in and winning events in diving, athletes 

who excel can enter excellent schools with an achievement pathway, so that in addition to sports 

achievements, academic achievements can also be obtained. 

Keywords: Program Evaluation, CIPP Model and Anemone Dive Club 

 

 

 

  



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 401 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Sport is a lifestyle for many 

people, even in groups or individuals. 

Sport has become a special need that is 

indispensable, as time goes by, 

technology and scientific advances in the 

field of sports have turned into a 

necessity in human life and nowadays it 

has grown rapidly and is in demand by 

many people, from children to adults. In 

this case, sports have developed rapidly 

through coaching in the development of 

sports achievements that have been 

carried out and directed to achieve sports 

achievements at the regional, national 

and international levels. 

Diving is one of the oldest sports 

in human civilization. This sport has 

been a part of human life since its 

inception and helps humans survive in 

rivers and oceans. In Indonesia, the sport 

of diving has developed very rapidly so 

that there are many clubs in big cities 

throughout Indonesia that are in great 

demand and also have high-achieving 

athletes. 

The Anemon Dive Club is a 

diving club under the auspices of Mrs. 

Endang as a club coach and as an 

administrator of PB POSSI Lampung. 

Many diver seeds were born by the 

Anemone Dive Club to represent 

championships in local to national 

competitions. Even though the Anemone 

Dive Club has outstanding athletes, it 

still lacks many in terms of coaching and 

training programs. 

In the Republic of Indonesia Law 

No. 3 of 2005 article 1, paragraph (3) 

states that the national sports system is 

all aspects of sports that are interrelated 

in a planned, systematic, integrated and 

sustainable manner as a whole which 

includes regulation, education, training, 

management, development fostering. 

and supervision to achieve national 

sporting goals. The scope of sports 

includes 3 forms of sports activities, 

namely educational sports, recreational 

sports and achievement sports. 

(Widowati, 2015) 

In coaching there are several 

factors that must be considered, 

including infrastructure, coaches, 

organizational systems, financing, and 

recruiting athletes. In sports 

infrastructure, it plays a very important 

role to support sports coaching and 

development. The sports infrastructure 

needed for sports coaching and 

development should meet national and 

international standards. 

The aim of coaching is to get 

competitive and significant success with 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 402 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

a number of coaches as the goal of the 

success of the programs they run. 

Evaluation and assessment is a 

determination and achievement of goals 

in a coaching program. Assessment is a 

form of testing system in coaching 

diving clubs and to find out how far the 

athlete has mastered the coaching 

program objectives that have been 

selected or set by the coach in a 

coaching. Therefore, the assessment can 

be obtained from a very accurate 

information about the implementation of 

successful development of diving 

athletes which is measured and obtained 

based on the achievement of the 

objectives of the coaching program. 

The implementation of program 

evaluation is an activity process to 

collect, describe, conclude or obtain 

useful information directly, so that it can 

be used as an appropriate alternative for 

making decisions and also to evaluate if 

there is an error or improvement. The 

evaluation of this program is very 

important, because it aims to find out and 

determine facts about the running of 

public policy implementation in the field 

which results can be positive and 

negative. If the evaluation that has been 

carried out in a professional manner can 

produce findings that are objectively in 

the form of data that is analyzed and the 

conclusions cannot be manipulated, 

which in turn will provide benefits to the 

relevant guidance organization in the 

development program itself. 

Based on the results of 

observations and interviews with the 

Anemon Dive Club management, that 

there has never been an evaluation of a 

diving club coaching program, the 

evaluation process has not been carried 

out comprehensively in the club, has not 

systematically arranged training 

programs in diving, there is no adequate 

infrastructure, lack of attention as well as 

the quality of coaches who still do not 

have a coaching license certificate either 

at the Anemon Dive Club, or the budget 

spent from the club. 

The implementation of program 

evaluation is an activity process to 

collect, describe, conclude or obtain 

useful information directly, so that it can 

be used as an appropriate alternative for 

making decisions and also to evaluate if 

there is an error or improvement. The 

evaluation of this program is very 

important, because it aims to find out and 

determine facts about the running of 

public policy implementation in the field 

which results can be positive and 

negative. If the evaluation that has been 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 403 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

carried out in a professional manner can 

produce findings that are objectively in 

the form of data that is analyzed and the 

conclusions cannot be manipulated, 

which in turn will provide benefits to the 

relevant guidance organization in the 

development program itself. 

Based on the results of 

observations and interviews with the 

Anemon Dive Club management, that 

there has never been an evaluation of a 

diving club coaching program, the 

evaluation process has not been carried 

out comprehensively in the club, has not 

systematically arranged training 

programs in diving, there is no adequate 

infrastructure, lack of attention as well as 

the quality of coaches who still do not 

have a coaching license certificate either 

at the Anemon Dive Club, or the budget 

spent from the club. 

This evaluation aims to provide 

an overview of the results of the 

coaching program in the hope that it can 

help administrators, coaches, athletes to 

improve and optimize athletes' 

achievements, to reach even higher 

levels, and as a reference for club 

administrators to pay attention to 

fostering sports achievement. diving 

with all aspects that support athletes' 

achievements and also as a reference for 

advancing sports achievements, 

especially in diving. 

From the description above, the 

researchers are interested in evaluating 

the Anemon Dive Club coaching 

program using the CIPP method. This 

evaluation discusses the Anemon Dive 

Club coaching program such as the 

background of the coaching program, the 

objectives of the coaching program, the 

coaching program, coaches, athletes, 

facilities and infrastructure, financing, 

parental support, implementation of 

coaching programs, the process of 

implementing training programs, 

monitoring and evaluation of 

achievements. 

Program Evaluation 

Program evaluation is one in a 

series of activities which can be carried 

out deliberately to determine the degree 

to which the success rate of the program 

we will achieve. Thus it can be said that 

program evaluation knowledge is the 

construction of knowledge structures or 

the ability to know to what extent the 

carefully planned activities can be 

achieved (Mesiono, 2017). 

Program evaluation is a series of 

activities carried out deliberately and 

carefully to determine the level of 

implementation or success of a program 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 404 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

by knowing the effectiveness of each 

component, both on ongoing programs 

and programs that have passed. (Nia, 

May Istiyani, 2019) 

According to Mugiadi in Sudjana, 

he explained that program evaluation is 

an effort to gather information about a 

program, activity or project. (Lazwardi, 

2017) so that definition program 

evaluation is an activity to collect 

information in a project. 

Based on this definition, in 

program evaluation we must know the 

sequence of programs and structures that 

we have designed so that we can find out 

the success rate of the programs we have 

made. 

In this case, what researchers will 

evaluate is the program evaluation at the 

Anemon dive club. 

Coaching 

Guidance is an educational effort 

both formal and non-formal which is 

carried out consciously, planned, 

directed, regularly and responsibly in 

order to introduce, grow, assist and 

develop a balanced, intact and aligned 

personality basis of knowledge and skills 

according to talent, tendencies and 

desires and abilities as provisions for 

further on their own initiative, adding, 

enhancing and developing themselves, 

others and their environment towards 

achieving optimal dignity, quality and 

human capabilities and an independent 

person (Siti Nisrima, Muhammad 

Yunus, 2016). 

Sports coaching is a pattern as "the 

main guideline and is the basis for the 

preparation of Indonesian sports 

development programs that take place in 

an integrated and sustainable manner" 

(Melfa Br Nababan, Rahma Dewi, 

2018). 

Achievement coaching is an action 

that is carried out efficiently, effectively 

and sustainably to achieve better results, 

namely athletes' achievements at the 

national and international levels 

(Muslima & Himam, 2016) Sports 

coaching, apart from being largely 

determined by the professionalism of 

human resources, is also determined by 

the support of facilities, policies, funds 

and operationalization of sports 

coaching management in a professional 

manner (Rumini & Rani, 2016) 

Anemone Dive Club 

According to Husni, diving is a 

healthy sport because almost all muscles 

of the body move and develop by 

coordinating the strength of each diver 

(Widiastuti, 2017). Diving is a sport that 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 405 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

involves all muscles in all parts of the 

body (Febrianta, 2016). 

Starting from his passion for 

water sports, Mrs. Prihartini and her 

colleagues were involved in an 

interesting discussion about diving in 

2014. Then they immediately formed the 

Anemon Dive Club to provide the best 

and structured water sports program for 

all ages. 

The Anemone Dive Club aims to 

play an important role in the 

development of aquatic sports. Having 

been formed by Mrs. Prihatrini and 

colleagues with professionalism and 

discipline. Anemon Dive Club is 

committed to providing the best quality 

program service, for members and the 

community. Then with the availability of 

facilities and certified and experienced 

national instructors, the Anemon Dive 

Club strives as a diving club to be the 

best in Lampung, Lampung Province and 

National. 

Evaluation Model 

Nowadays the theory that we 

know about many evaluation models is 

used to evaluate a program. Some of the 

program evaluation models were 

developed by experts, Kaufman and 

Thomas in Arikunto and Cepi: (Azmi, 

2016). 

Goal Oriented Evaluation This 

model is the model that appeared at the 

earliest. The object of observation in this 

model is the goal of the program that has 

been set long before the program starts. 

Evaluation is carried out continuously, 

continuously, checking to what extent 

these objectives have been carried out in 

the program implementation process. 

This model was developed by Tyler 

(Fikri, 2016). 

Formative Sumative Evaluation 

Model The object of evaluation in this 

model is the behavior of students, 

including learning outcomes (cognitive), 

traits, attitudes, interests, talents, and 

also aspects of the student's personality. 

The instrument used in general is a 

written test (paper and pencil test) in the 

form of an objective test, which tends to 

be standardized. This model uses a norm 

referenced assessment approach. 

Goal Free Evaluation Model, this 

evaluation model was developed by 

Michael Scriven, in carrying out 

program evaluations the evaluator does 

not need to pay attention to the program 

objectives. What needs to be considered 

in the program is how the program 

works, by identifying the performances 

that occur, both positive things (namely 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 406 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

things that are expected) and negative 

things (which are actually not expected). 

Countenance Evaluation Model, 

This model was developed by Stake. 

According to the additional reviews 

given by Fernandes in Arikunto and 

Cepi, the Stake model emphasizes the 

implementation of two main things, 

namely (1) description and (2) judgment; 

and distinguishing the existence of three 

stages in program evaluation, namely (1) 

antecedents / context, (2) transactions 

(process), (3) output (output-outcomes). 

(Azmi, 2016) 

CSE-UCLA consists of two 

abbreviations, namely CSE and UCLA. 

CSE stands for Center for the Study of 

Evaluation, while UCLA stands for 

University of California in Los Angeles. 

The characteristic of the CSE-UCLA 

model is that there are five stages in the 

evaluation, namely planning, 

development, implementation, results, 

and impact (Azmi, 2016). 

The Dicrepancy Model, a model 

developed by Malcolm Provus, is a 

model that emphasizes the view of gaps 

in program implementation. The 

program evaluation conducted by the 

evaluator measures the size of the gaps 

in each component. (Azmi, 2016). 

CIPP Model, the evaluation 

model is categorized according to the 

object and purpose of its evaluation. One 

of the evaluation models is the CIPP 

Evaluation Model. This evaluation 

model is the model most widely known 

and applied by evaluators. 

The CIPP model developed by 

Stufflebeam, this model stands for the 

initial letters of four words, namely: 

Context evaluation; Input evaluation 

(evaluation of input; Process 

evaluation); Product evaluation 

(evaluation of results) (Reftari, Suryana, 

& Setiaman, 2018). 

METHOD 

The research method used in this 

study uses two approaches, namely a 

qualitative approach and a quantitative 

approach. As it is known, qualitative 

research is a scientific activity to collect 

data systematically, sort it according to 

certain categories, describe and interpret 

data obtained from interviews or 

ordinary conversations, observation and 

documentation (Manab, 2015). 

Quantitative research deals with 

statistical measures whose data is in the 

form of numbers, emphasizing the 

breadth of the study area rather than its 

depth (Manab, 2015). 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 407 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

The method used in this study is 

an evaluative method using the CIPP 

design (Context, Input, Process, 

Product). CIPP is an evaluation model 

that evaluates a program based on each 

of its components, namely context, input, 

process, and results (Subar Junanto, 

2018). 

This model was chosen because it 

is comprehensive, because the object of 

evaluation is not only the final result but 

involves the context, input and process. 

The research design used is also based on 

the key component of the CIPP 

Stufflebeam 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Figure 1 Key Components of the CIPP 

Evaluation Model 

Source: (Sumenate, 2016) 

 

CIPP Model (Context, Input, 

Process, Product). The CIPP model 

(Context, Input, Process, Product) is the 

work of a team of researchers, who are 

members of a committee organization, 

Phi Delta Kappa USA, which was 

chaired by Daniel Stuffle-Beam. CIPP in 

the explanation of Context, Input, 

Process, Product is an abbreviation of the 

initial letter of four words, namely: 

1)  Context Evaluation 

Context evaluation to serve 

planning desicion, this evaluation 

context helps planning decisions, 

determining needs to be achieved by 

the program and formulating 

program objectives. Context 

evaluation is a needs assessment 

(Yati & Yaswinda, 2019). Context 

evaluation helps plan decisions, 

formulate program objectives and 

determine or identify needs to be 

achieved by a program. (Subar 

Junanto, 2018). 

 

2)  Input Evaluation 

Input evaluation is intended 

to help determine the program to 

make the changes needed. Input 

evaluation looks for constraints and 

potential resources available within 

an institution. (Yati & Yaswinda, 

2019) Evaluation of inputs helps to 

organize decisions in providing 

information to determine how to use 

resources to achieve program 

objectives properly. (Subar Junanto, 

2018). The input evaluation 

component includes: (a) human 

resources (b) supporting facilities 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 408 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

and equipment, (c) funds / budget, 

and (d) various procedures and rules 

needed (Wahyudhiana, 2015). 

3)  Process Evaluation 

Process evaluation is the 

implementation of the program. 

Process evaluation can review the 

organization's plan and previous 

evaluations to identify important 

aspects of the organization that must 

be monitored (Yati & Yaswinda, 

2019). Process evaluation includes 

the collection of research data that 

has been determined and applied in 

program implementation practices. 

(Subar Junanto, 2018). 

According to Stufflebeam at al. 

process evaluation is a routine 

examination of the implementation 

of the plan plus the documentation 

process, including changes in 

planning as well as major obstacles 

and / or implementation of wrong 

procedures (Nasri, 2019). 

4)  Product Evaluation 

Product evaluation is an 

evaluation that aims to measure, 

interpret, and assess program 

achievements. In addition, to assess 

outcomes or outcomes and relate 

them objectively to contexts, inputs 

and processes. The product 

component or result is an 

assessment carried out to measure 

success in achieving the stated goals 

(Yati & Yaswinda, 2019). Product 

evaluation is an assessment carried 

out to measure success in achieving 

the goals that have been set (Subar 

Junanto, 2018). 

Then in the CIPP model, the 

evaluation actors are usually not 

directly related to the program to be 

evaluated, but can work with 

someone who is directly involved in 

the program. In addition, evaluators 

must be able to collaborate with 

people who work as staff in program 

implementation. This needs to be 

done so that the evaluator can 

determine and get all the 

information and also for the 

interpretation of the data that will be 

used for decision making. The CIPP 

model will be maximally 

implemented if there is good 

cooperation between actors and 

implementers of a program. 

So that the ultimate goal of 

program evaluation is to provide an 

assessment of the program being 

carried out and provide 

recommendations for subsequent 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 409 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

decision makers on the 

implementation of the program. 

The validation of this study is to 

use triangulation, namely by cross-

checking information obtained from 

several sources and between informant 

interview data and other informants 

(Ananda & Rafida, 2017). The data 

obtained using interviews, observation, 

documentation, and questionnaires. 

In activities such as 

documentation, observation, and 

interviews, the more domain is the 

researcher himself. In this case 

compiling guidelines in the form of a 

document inventory list, interview 

guidelines, observation note sheets, and 

inventory checklists, the form is a draft 

containing an outline or guidelines for 

the data collection process in the field 

which will be entirely carried out by 

researchers based on the success criteria 

of the coaching program. Anemone Dive 

Club, there is no validation process for 

these instruments. 

Based on the evaluation criteria 

of the Anemon Dive Club coaching 

program, then the indicators to be 

measured can be determined. Then this 

indicator is translated into question items 

or instrument statements. To simplify the 

preparation of the instrument, it is 

necessary to use an instrument 

development matrix or instrument grid. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS  

In general, the results of this study 

1) Context: The level of suitability of the 

Anemon Dive Club program, to the 

vision, mission, objectives of strategic 

plans in coaching and developing sports, 

namely aquatic sports, 2) Input: 

Implementation of operational 

performance of coaches, as well as 

facilities and infrastructure, 3) Process: 

Implementation of coaching programs 

and the effectiveness of program 

implementation, 4) Product: 

achievements. 

1)  Data results on the Anemone Dive 

Club Management Context variable 

Based on the data obtained by the 

researcher in terms of background 

context variables, objectives and data 

strategies, the overall result of the 

context in the management is 82.85%, 

then the coach is 84.62% and athletes are 

84%. A very well defined level of 

attainment. This is evidenced by the 

choice of answers to the questionnaire 

for each given question. 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 410 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

 

Image 2. Context Variable Diagram of 

Anemone Dive Club administrators, coaches 

and athletes 

 

2) Input Evaluation Results 

Based on the data obtained by the 

researcher in terms of input variables, 

namely organization, coaching and 

training programs, athletes, trainers, 

financing infrastructure and parental 

support, the overall data on the results of 

input to the management are 81.9%, then 

the coach is 85%, athletes 81.8% and 

80% parents. A very well defined level 

of attainment. This is evidenced by the 

choice of answers to the questionnaire 

for each given question 

 

Figure 3. Input Variable Diagram of Anemone 

Dive Club Administrators, Coaches, Athletes 

and Parents 

 

3) Process Evaluation 

Based on the data obtained by the 

researcher in terms of the background 

process variables, objectives, and data 

strategies, the overall result of the 

process on the management is 65%, then 

coaches are 86.19%, athletes are 77.5%, 

and parents are 82.6%. A very well 

defined level of attainment. This is 

evidenced by the choice of answers to 

the questionnaire for each given question 

 

Figure 4. Diagram of the process 

variables of the Anemone Dive Club 

Administrators, Coaches, Athletes and 

Parents 

 

4)  Product Evaluation 

The purpose of product evaluation 

is to measure and assist further decisions, 

what has been achieved and what has 

been done after the program runs. 

Feedback on performance is critical, 

both throughout the program cycle and in 

conclusion product evaluations should 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 411 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

often be extended to assess long-term 

effects. 

a.  There are many athletes who enter 

Lampung public schools through the 

achievement path. In addition to 

being able to do diving activities, 

anemone diving club athletes must 

also prioritize education, one of 

which is to enter the country's 

flagship schools that are available 

b. There are athletes fostered by the 

Anemon Dive Club who were 

fostered from an early age and have 

now become a progressive class who 

have won several events such as 

Kadek, winner of 2 in Finswimming 

50 m and 50 m at the Porkot Open 

championship in 2016. 

c. As in explanation number 2, the same 

as above an athlete named Sayu has 

also managed to win several events 

such as Finswimming 50 m, 3rd place 

in the 2014 Regional Championship 

CONCLUSION 

Based on the overall conclusion 

above regarding the evaluation of the 

Anemone Dive Club coaching program, 

it can be concluded with each concept of 

the CIPP method criteria. 

The evaluation obtained from the 

conclusions of the CIPP method is as 

follows: 

Context variable: 

1.  There is a vision and mission that 

has been structured and planned 

systematically. Seen from the point 

of view of the coaching actors 

starting from the General 

Chairperson, vice chairman, 

secretary, treasurer, head of 

technical coaching, marketing 

administration, coaches and athletes 

regarding the vision and mission 

need to be improved again. 

2.  There is a goal the Anemone Dive 

Club has set towards coaching 

aquatic sports. Where in this case to 

foster and create seeds for diving 

athletes to excel at the national and 

international levels. 

3.  There is a strategic plan that has 

been made in detail that has gone 

well. However, in its application 

there are deficiencies such as 

arranging activities in training at a 

certain level that have an impact on 

the role of the club. 

The results of the context variable 

overall evaluation of the Anemone Dive 

Club coaching program an average 

percentage of 84.2% with the criteria 

Very Good with details of the Anemon 

Dive Club management getting a 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 412 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

percentage of 82.85% (Very Good), 

84.6% Coach athletes 84% (Very Good) 

Input variables: 

1.  Organizational Performance 

In the organizational 

performance of the Anemon Dive 

Club, it is structured and planned 

like the one in the association 

structure. But in implementation 

there are still shortcomings. As there 

are two jobs at once in an 

association where everyone should 

have one job as their responsibility. 

Because with the arrangement in the 

association everyone can be 

responsible for their part of work. 

2.  Training coaching program 

The training coaching 

program within the Anemone Dive 

Club is in place and running as 

usual. By creating an exercise 

program and setting a training 

schedule. In this case it is necessary 

to arrange arrangements as for 

common needs, so that athletes can 

follow the programs of the coach at 

his current level. 

3.  Characteristics of athletes 

The characteristics of 

athletes are the roles of 

administrators, coaches and parents 

to organize and direct athletes. 

Because the role of athletes in the 

Anemon Dive Club is an early age 

athlete. Where the athlete still wants 

his world to play. Therefore, parents 

who bring their children to 

participate in training in order to 

regulate the role of children to 

compete and understand what to do 

in training activities. 

4.  Recruitment of coaches 

The recruitment of a coach is 

an important role in the Club, 

because the current coach is 

knowledgeable about science and 

technology in diving. Moreover, the 

trainer in the future must also have a 

coaching certificate which can 

strengthen the trainer's role in 

training diving. 

5.  Infrastructure 

Infrastructure is a need that 

must be met. So far, the facilities 

and infrastructure in the Anemon 

Dive Club have been carried out and 

are running well. Just as an athlete 

must have the necessary facilities in 

his training, then the administrator 

presents a good and appropriate 

swimming pool. Therefore, both of 

them are very important in diving 

training needs. 

6.  Source of funds 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 413 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

The source of funds is an 

indispensable role in the operation 

of payments and payroll. In this case 

the source of funds in the Anemon 

Dive Club comes from the athlete's 

monthly fee only. But in the current 

journey, the management is trying to 

develop funding sources from 

sponsors, event activities and 

donors. Because with this 

component, funding and payroll can 

be even better in the future. 

The results of the overall input 

variable evaluation of the Anemone Dive 

Club coaching program obtained a 

percentage of 83.5%, the criteria are 

Very Good with details of the Anemon 

Dive Club management getting 81.9% 

(Very Good), coaches 85% (Very Good), 

athletes 81.85% (Good Once), and 

parents 80 (Good). 

Process variables: 

1. Open training system to increase more 

disciplined training to increase 

athletes' motivation to train 

2. The implementation of the training 

program is appropriate based on the 

training program prepared by the 

trainer. 

3.  Use of the walking method properly 

so that athletes do not feel bored in 

practicing both dry land and 

swimming pools. The role of giving 

methods has been carried out well 

based on the evaluation of 

administrators and trainers. 

4.  The supervision of the training 

program is not appropriate due to the 

absence of a monitoring team for the 

implementation of the training 

program. 

5.  The welfare of athletes and coaches 

is good enough. 

6.  Coordination and communication 

between administrators and coaches 

and athletes is going well. The 

management also coordinates 

POSSI Lampung. 

The results of the evaluation of the 

Anemone Diving Club coaching 

program have an average percentage of 

82.98%, with good criteria, with details 

of Management 65% (good), Trainers 

86% (Very Good), Athletes 77.5% 

(good), Parents 82.67% (Good Once). 

Product variables: 

1.  The success of the coaching 

program can be proven by the many 

achievements that have been 

achieved by the Anemon Dive Club 

in winning diving events both from 

the regional and provincial levels, 

although at the national level it has 

not yet been implemented and the 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 414 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

existence of athletes fostered by the 

Anemon Slam Club who have been 

fostered from an early age and now 

have being a progressive class has 

won several events. 

REFERENCES 

 

Adityo, S. (2015). Evaluasi 

Keterlaksanaan Dan Hambatan 

Pendidikan Karakter di SMP. 

Journal of Chemical Information 

and Modeling. Univeristas Sanata 

Dharma.https://doi.org/10.1017/CB

O9781107415324.004 

Adiyudha Permana, P. S. B. (2015). 

Tingkat Partisipasi Olahraga dan 

Ketersediaan SDM Keolahragaan 

Kota Pontianak Provinsi 

Kalimantan Barat Ditinjau dari 

Sport Development Index (SDI). 

Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga, 4(1), 

9–19. 

https://doi.org/10.31571/JPO.V4I1.

26 

Akbar, M. F. (2016). Evaluasi Kebijakan 

Program Pemberian Dana Bantuan 

Operasional Sekolah (Studi Kasus 

pada Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten 

Mamuju Utara). Jurnal Analisis 

Kebijakan Dan Pelayanan Publik, 

2(1), 47–64. Retrieved from 

https://www.neliti.com/publications

/98823/evaluasi-kebijakan-

program-pemberian-dana-bantuan-

operasional-sekolah-studi-kasu 

Akhidatul Khikmah, M. E. W. (2019). 

Survei Sarana Dan Prasarana 

Pendidikan Jasmani Di Madrasah 

Tsanawiyah (MTs) Se-Kecamatan 

Klojen Kota Malang Pada Semester 

Ganjil Tahun 2017. Indonesia 

Journal of Sports and Physical 

Education, 1(1), 12–19. 

Akhmad, I. (2015). Efek Latihan 

Berbeban Terhadap Fungsi Kerja 

Otot. Jurnal Pedagogik 

Keolahragaan, 1(2), 80–102. 

Alwan, Menza Hendri,  dan D. (2015). 

Faktor-Faktor Yang Mendorong 

Siswa MIA SMAN Mengikuti 

Bimbingan Belajar Luar Sekolah Di 

Kecamatan Telanaipura Kota Jambi. 

Jurnal EduFisika Vol. 02 No. 01, 

Juli 2017, 02(01). 

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983

907.n1534 

Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). 

Pengantar Evaluasi Program 

pendidikan. Medan: Perdana 

Publishing (Vol. 53). 

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97811

07415324.004 

Boy Indrayana, I. B. S. (2019). Program, 

Evaluasi Manajemen Pembinaan 

Cabang Olahraga Unggulan 

Provinsi Jambi. Indonesia Sport 

Journal, 2(1), 78–89. 

Butsan, M. N. (2013). Perokok Vs 

Pengolahraga Manfaat Olahraga 

Bagi Perokok Dan Risiko Rokok 

Bagi Pengolahraga. Jurnal AAK, 

2(3), 48–53. 

David, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Harjo, S. 

P. (2016). Evaluasi Dan Strategi 

Pengembangan Sma Indonesisch 

Nerderlandsche School (Ins) 

Kayutanam. Jurnal Penelitian Dan 

Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 27. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.

7518 

Divayana, D. G. H. (2017). Evaluasi 

Pemanfaatan E-Learning di 

Universitas Teknologi Indonesia 

Menggunakan Model CSE-UCLA. 

Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 

280–289. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.1

2853 

Diyananda, D. (2016). Evaluasi Program 

Manajemen Sport Center Tifosi. 

Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 

Ensminger, D. C., Kallemeyn, L. M., 

Rempert, T., Wade, J., & Polanin, 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 415 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

M. (2015). Case study of an 

evaluation coaching model: 

Exploring the role of the evaluator. 

Evaluation and Program Planning, 

49(May 2019), 124–136. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogpl

an.2015.01.002 

Fakhruddin, Putri Rizca Ayu. (2017). 

Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Belajar 

Anak Jalanan Di Kota Semarang 

Melalui Program Pendidikan 

Nonformal. Jurnal Eksistensi 

Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (E-Plus), 

2(1), 24–29. 

https://doi.org/10.30870/e-

plus.v2i1.2945 

Fauzi, R. (2016). Evaluasi Program 

Pembinaan Olahraga Sepakbola Di 

Ssb Gelora Di Palangka Raya. 

Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 483–

489. 

Febrianta, Y. (2016). Alternatif 

Mengembangkan Kemampuan 

Motorik Kasar Anak Usia Dini 

Dengan Aktivitas Akuatik 

(Berenang). Al Athfal: Jurnal 

Pendidikan Anak, 2(2), 85–95. 

Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-

suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/alathf

al/article/view/1269 

Fernando, J. (2016). Evaluasi Program 

Pembinaan Bulutangkis Pengcab 

PBSI Kabupaten Muara Enim. 

Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 

Fikri, A. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pusat 

Pembinaan Dan Latihan Olahraga 

Pelajar (PPLP) Cabang Olahraga 

Anggar Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. 

Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 

Fujiawati, F. S. (2016). Pemahaman 

Konsep Kurikulum dan 

Pembelajaran dengan Peta Konsep 

Bagi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Seni. 

Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Seni, 

1(1), 16–28. 

Habibie. (2016). Evaluasi Program 

Pembinaan Kelas Khusus Olahraga 

SMA Negri 8 Kota Bekasi. Journal 

UNISMA, VII(2), 142–152. 

Indrayana, B., & Yuliawan, E. (2019). 

Penyuluhan Pentingnya 

Peningkatan Vo2Max Guna 

Meningkatkan Kondisi Fisik 

Pemain Sepakbola Fortuna Fc 

Kecamatan Rantau Rasau. IImiah 

Sport Coaching And Education, 1, 

41–50. 

Irmansyah, J. (2017). Evaluasi program 

pembinaan prestasi cabang olahraga 

bola voli pantai. Jurnal 

Keolahragaan, 5(1), 24. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i1.12

759 

Islahuzzaman, N. (2010). Identifikasi 

Bakat Usia Dini Siswa SD – SMP 

Surakarta Islahuzzaman. Pedagogia, 

13(1), 61–69. 

Kautsar, A., Sumardiyanto, S., & 

Ruhayati, Y. (2018). Analisis 

Fungsi Manajemen Organisasi 

Olahraga (Studi Kualitiatif Pada 

Pengurus Daerah Ikatan Sport 

Sepeda Indonesia Jawa Barat). 

Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan, 

3(2), 41–

45.https://doi.org/10.17509/jtikor.v

3i2.10135 

Khalida Nawa Aprilia, Agus Kristiyanto, 

M. D. (2018). Analisis penerapan 

prinsip-prinsip latihan terhadap 

peningkatan kondisi fisik atlet bulu 

tangkis PPLOP Jawa Tengah tahun 

2017/2018. Journal Power Of 

Sports, 1(1), 55. 

https://doi.org/10.25273/jpos.v1i1.2

210 

Langga, Z. A., & Supriyadi. (2016). 

Pengaruh Model Latihan 

Menggunakan Metode Praktik 

Distribusi Terhadap Keterampilan 

Dribble Anggota Ekstrakurikuler 

Bolabasket SMPN 18 Malang. 

Jurnal Kepelatihan Olahraga, 1 (1), 

90–104. 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 416 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pon

e.0011069 

Lazwardi, D. (2017). Implementasi 

Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Di 

Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Dan 

Menengah. Kependidikan Islam, 

7(2), 67–79. 

Liska Sukiyandari, K. (2016). Keadaan 

Sarana Dan Prasarana Pendidikan 

Jasmani Di Sd Se Uptd Kecamatan 

Semarang Barat Kota Semarang 

Tahun 2015. Jurnal Ilmiah SPIRIT, 

16(2), 1–12. 

Manab, A. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan 

Pendekatan Kualitatif. Yagyakarta. 

Mardiana, F., & Hastuti,  tri A. (2014). 

Faktor Pendukung Prestasi 

Bolabasket Peserta Ekstrakurikuler 

Bolabasket Di Sman 1 Depok 

Sleman Yogyakarta. Jurnal 

Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 

10(November), 13–18. 

Melfa Br Nababan, Rahma Dewi, I. A. 

(2018). Analisis Pola Pembinaan 

Dan Pengembangan Olahraga 

Rekreasi Di Federasi Olahraga 

Rekreasi Masyarakat Indonesia 

Sumatera Utara Tahun 2017. Jurnal 

Pedagogik Olahraga, 4(1), 38–55. 

Mesiono. (2017). Dalam Tinjauan 

Evaluasi Program. Ilmu Pendidikan 

Dan Kependidikan, 4(2), 1–22. 

Retrieved 

fromhttp://repository.uinsu.ac.id/34

85/1/Evaluasi Program.pdf 

Muliyani, T., & Huriaty, D. (2016). 

Pengembangan Instrumen Tes 

Geometri Dan Pengukuran Pada 

Jenjang Smp. Math Didactic: Jurnal 

Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 91–

98. 

https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v2i2.

33 

Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi 

Program Dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. 

Jurnal Ilmiah PENJAS, 25(1), 9–14. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymm

an.2017.04.009 

Muslima, T. F., & Himam, F. (2016). 

Peran Pelatih dalam Pembinaan 

Prestasi Atlet pada Organisasi 

Taekwondo Profesional. Gadjah 

Mada Journal of Professional 

Psychology (GamaJPP), 2(3), 186. 

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajpp.4

1769 

Nasri. (2019). Evaluasi Program 

Pembinaan Cabang Olahraga Karate 

Dan Pencak Silat Sulawesi Selatan. 

Jurnal Prestasi, 3(5), 1. 

https://doi.org/10.24114/jp.v3i5.13

443 

Nia, Mei Istiyani, U. (2019). Evaluasi 

Program Model CIPP Pada 

Pelatihan Menjahit Di LKP Kartika 

Bawen. Jurnal Pendidikan Luar 

Sekolah, 3(2), 6–13. 

Nugroho, W. (2019). Pengaruh Layanan 

Mediasi Terhadap Perilaku Bullying 

Pada Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 2 

Gondangrejo Tahun Pelajaran 2015-

2016. Jurnal Medi Kons, 5(2), 103–

114. Retrieved from 

http://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/

mdk/article/download/3189/2682 

Oky Anggia, Isti Dwi Puspita Wati, A. T. 

(2019). Survei Efektivitas Latihan 

Pada Ekstrakurikuler Sepak Bola Di 

Smp Negeri 4 Dedai. Jurnal Ilmu 

Keolahragaan, 2(1), 1. 

https://doi.org/10.26418/jilo.v2i1.3

2625 

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia 

Nomor 44 Tahun 2014 Tentang 

Pemberian Penghargaan Olahraga. 

(2014) (Vol. 20). 

https://doi.org/10.1080/1476832050

0230185 

Pradhana, A. (2016). Analisis Sport 

Development Index Kecamatan 

Ngronggot Kabupaten Nganjuk. 

Jurnal Kesehatan Olahraga, 4(4), 2–

7. 

RAHADIAN, R. A. (2016). EVALUASI 

PEMBINAAN JAQ SWIMMING. 

Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (04), December- 417 

Noprian Tri Handoko, Achmad Sofiyan Hanif, Yasep Setiakarnawijaya 
 

 

Rahmat, I. (2016). Evaluasi Manajemen 

PELATDA Bola Basket DKI 

Jakarta Menuju PON Riau 2012. 

Biormatika Jurnal Ilmiah FKIP 

Universitas Subang, 3(9), 1689–

1699. 

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97811

07415324.004 

Rasyono. (2016). Ekstrakurikuler 

Sebagai Dasar Pembinaan Olahraga 

Pelajar. Journal of Physical 

Education Health and Sport, 3(1), 

44–49. 

https://doi.org/10.15294/jpehs.v3i1.

6501 

Ratna, D., Tangkudung, S. J., & Hanif, 

A. S. (2018). Evaluasi Program 

Pemusatan Latihan Daerah (Pelatda) 

Bolavoli Pasir Putri Dki Jakarta. 

Jurnal Ilmiah Sport Coaching and 

Education, 2(September). 

https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25

797.50407 

Reftari, D. H., Suryana, A., & Setiaman, 

A. (2018). Komunikasi Pemasaran 

Olahraga Renang, 6(2), 247–260. 

Retnawati, H. (2015). The Comparison 

of The Accuracy of Likert Scale. 

Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian 

Inovasi Pembelajaran, 45(2), 156–

167. 

Ridwan, A. (2020). Pengaruh Latihan 

Pliometrik Terhadap Hasil Long 

Passing Sepak Bola. Jurnal 

Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran 

Khatulistiwa, 9(3), 3–10. 

Rihatno, T., & Tobing, S. R. A. L. 

(2019). Pengembangan Model 

Latihan Kekuatan Otot Lengan Pada 

Cabang Olahraga Softball. Gladi : 

Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 10(1), 1–

14. 

https://doi.org/10.21009/gjik.101.0

1 

Rumini, & Rani, A. (2016). Pembinaan 

Prestasi di Pusat Pendidikan dan 

Latihan Olahraga Pelajar (PPLP) 

Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Journal of 

Physical Education, Sport, Health 

and Recreations, 5(2), 47–52. 

Santosa, G. T. (2019). Survei 

manajemen pembinaan prestasi di 

klub atletik barac kab.banjarnegara 

tahun 2019. Universitas Negeri 

Yogyakarta. 

Saputra, D. (2014). Pengaruh Latihan 

Padat (Massed Practice) Terhadap 

Kemampuan Dribbling Pada 

Pemain Club Bola Basket Patriots 

Kota Bengkulu. Program Studi 

Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Kesehatan 

Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu 

Pendidikan Universitas Bengkulu. 

Universitas 

Bengkulu.https://doi.org/10.1017/C

BO9781107415324.004 

Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 10(2), 

218. 

https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v10

i2.3384 

Yarmani, Y., & Irwanto, D. (2017). 

Tingkat Pemahaman Peraturan 

Permainan Sepakbola (Law of the 

Game) Wasit C-2 Dan C-1 Asprov 

Pssi Bengkulu. Kinestetik : Jurnal 

Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 1(1), 

50–53. 

https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v1i1.10

924 

Yati, F., & Yaswinda, Y. (2019). 

Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPPO 

dalam Mengevaluasi 

Penyelenggaraan Lembaga PAUD. 

Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan 

Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 30. 

https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i

1.238 

Zapata, A. D. G. (2015). The National 

Service Training Program of State 

Colleges and Universities: An 

Assessment. Open Access Library 

Journal, 02(09), 1–9. 

https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.11018

45