Available online at :  http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/gjik 
Gladi : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan 13 (02) 2022, 146-160 
Permalink/DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.125.03 

 
 

Program evaluation of southeast sulawesi student sports center for 
development and training 

 
 

La Ode Isa 1, Johansyah Lubis 1, Bambang Sujiono 1  
 

1 Physical Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta,  
Komplek Universitas Negeri Jakarta Gedung M. Hatta Jl. Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta Timur, 

Indonesia 13220  
 

Correspondiing author. Email : Laodeisa37@gmailcom 
 

 

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the results of the evaluation of the Southeast Sulawesi 
Student Sports Training and Development Center which included the components of context, input, process 
and product. This research is a type of evaluation research through a quantitative and qualitative approach. 
Program evaluation is carried out to determine the achievement of the targets that have been set. Then 
make a decision on the program. In the program evaluation research using the CIPP evaluation model, 
namely context, input, process, product. The four evaluation aspects are used to determine the 
implementation of the Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports Training and Development Center Program. The 
research subjects selected were stakeholders as many as 30 respondents, namely athletes, coaches, and the 
Head of the Southeast Sulawesi Youth and Sports Office. Apart from informants from the stakeholders, 
the subjects of this research are documents related to the Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 
Development Center Program. 
 
Keywords: Evaluation, CIPP, Student  
  



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 147 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

INTRODUCTION 

Efforts to improve sports 

achievement need to continue to be 

carried out through coaching athletes as 

early as possible by searching and 

monitoring talent, breeding, education 

and training for sports achievements that 

are based on science and technology 

more effectively and efficiently as well 

as improving the quality of sports 

organizations both regionally and 

centrally (Saputra et al. al., 2020). 

Sports achievement is a demand 

that must be owned by a region, with 

sports achievements can raise human 

dignity both individually, community 

groups, regions, nations and countries 

even this needs to be supported by all 

parties. Improving achievement is not an 

easy activity where it really requires 

prerequisites in the form of 

characteristics that are in accordance 

with the sport. All sports, both individual 

and team or team, have the specific 

nature of their respective sports, so that 

sports development must be supported 

systematically in order to meet these 

demands and achieve high performance 

as expected. 

The sustainability of an 

achievement depends on the 

management's attention to the athlete so 

that the training program in question so 

far can be carried out as expected 

(Saputra et al., 2020). The process of 

coaching and developing sports 

achievements certainly requires athletes 

who have great potential. To get 

potential athletes, it is necessary to foster 

and develop achievements at the 

productive age, namely the school age 

level. 

Government efforts have been 

made, by establishing a sports coaching 

model with student status called the 

Student Education and Training Center. 

Learn as the right human resource to be 

the target of looking for the forerunner to 

the emergence of outstanding athletes in 

the future. 

This is also expressed by (Wani, 

2018) stating that students have great 

potential if their abilities are developed 

in a higher direction, especially in sports 

achievements. Monitoring of potential 

students in sports is closely related to the 

search for talented athletes, so 

monitoring needs to be done regularly 

and continuously. 

The responsibility of the 

Southeast Sulawesi Provincial 

Government given by the Central 

Government to foster the achievement of 

athletes/students is through the 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 148 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

establishment of the Student Education 

and Training Center. It is a forum for 

potential athletes/students who have 

talent, skills, potential and willingness to 

hone and improve sporting 

achievements. This is a student sports 

development unit that is fostered by the 

Youth and Sports Office of Southeast 

Sulawesi Province. The existence of the 

the training center as an educational 

sports center in the region, initially the 

Southeast Sulawesi training center ran 

five sports including rowing, pencak 

silat, takraw, athletics and taekwondo, 

but until now there are only three sports 

branches in Southeast Sulawesi training 

center, namely rowing, takraw and silat. 

With three branches of this sport, of 

course, it has a strategic position in an 

effort to produce excellent seeds for 

student athletes in the region. 

Because Student Education and 

Training Center is an institution that is 

responsible for fostering the 

achievement of athletes/students, it must 

in fact make policy innovations for the 

success of coaching athletes in the 

regions. The policy innovation in 

question is a policy for coaching athletes 

that is results and achievement-oriented 

based on the vision, mission, goals and 

objectives of the organization. Through 

the policy of coaching athletes from 

Student Education and Training Center 

Southeast Sulawesi, improving athlete 

achievement must be better than 

coaching athletes, previously handling 

athletes was still the responsibility of the 

Youth and Sports Office (Jopang, 2018). 

Based on the results of secondary 

data observations, the achievements of 

Student Education and Training Center 

Sports in Southeast Sulawesi Province 

for the last 5 years have continued to 

show a declining trend. In the 2015 Inter- 

Student Education and Training Center 

Championship, Southeast Sulawesi won 

12 medals, consisting of 2 gold medals, 

6 silver medals and 4 bronze medals. In 

2016 it increased to 14 gold medals, 

consisting of 3 gold medals, 7 silver 

medals and 4 bronze medals. 

Meanwhile, in 2017 Student Education 

and Training Center achievements 

experienced a very drastic decline, only 

8 medals, consisting of 1 gold medal. 5 

silver medals and 2 bronze medals. 

Meanwhile, at the National Sports Week 

and Regional Sports Week 

championships, the Student Education 

and Training Center Southeast Sulawesi 

achievements also continued to decline. 

In 2015 Student Education and Training 

Center Southeast Sulawesi only received 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 149 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

5 medals consisting of 1 gold. 1 silver 

and 3 bronze. In 2016 only won 3 silver 

medals and in 2017 also only won 3 

silver medals in the implementation of 

the Southeast Sulawesi National Sports 

Week and Regional Sports Week only 

getting 7 medals, 2 silver medals and 5 

bronze and in 2018 the elimination of 

one of the sports, namely athletics 

because it was suspected of not 

achieving (Department of Youth) and 

Sports of Southeast Sulawesi Province, 

2020) 

The achievements of athletes 

who are still active and alumni of 

Student Education and Training Center 

Southeast Sulawesi are one of the 

descriptions of the results. But in 

practice the existence of Student 

Education and Training Center 

Southeast Sulawesi also faces various 

challenges given the rapid development 

of science and technology and the 

dynamic conditions of the situation in 

Southeast Sulawesi so that many things 

need to be improved to support the sports 

development process in Student 

Education and Training Center 

Southeast Sulawesi. 

METHOD 

This research is a type of 

evaluation application research through 

quantitative and qualitative approaches. 

Evaluation application research is not 

intended to prove hypotheses but is 

intended to improve the program or 

policy being implemented. Program 

evaluation application is carried out to 

determine the achievement of the targets 

that have been set and then make a 

decision on the program. In the program 

evaluation application research using the 

CIPP evaluation model, namely context, 

input, process, product. The four aspects 

of the evaluation are used to determine 

the implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 

Development Center  

The context in the evaluation 

research of the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center is the objective, 

legal basis and needs analysis. Context 

evaluation was carried out to determine 

the suitability of the program's 

implementation objectives with the 

vision and mission, to find out the 

follow-up to the legal basis for the 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center and needs analysis. 

Evaluation of inputs in the Student 

Sports Coaching and Training Center 

Program includes program planning, 

human resources, organizational support 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 150 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

for the organizers, availability of 

facilities and infrastructure, availability 

of funds used to support the 

implementation of the Student Sports 

Coaching and Training Center Program. 

Evaluation of the inputs was conducted 

to determine the government's support 

capacity to achieve the objectives of the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center  

Process evaluation was carried 

out to determine the implementation of 

the Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

activities which included: 1) program 

implementation, and 2) supervision, 

while product evaluation at the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program was 

carried out by refers to the athlete's 

achievement, namely increasing 

physical, technical and mental 

development. 

The research design of the CIPP 

evaluation model was initiated by 

Stuffebem. In accordance with the 

theoretical study that has been stated, the 

CIPP model evaluates based on the 

evaluation components of context, input, 

process and product. The design of this 

evaluation research is presented so that 

the focus of the stages of research carried 

out by researchers can be clearly 

explained. The research design describes 

the flow of the evaluation of each 

evaluation component and describes the 

evaluation process of each of these 

components. 

After starting by setting 

evaluation application criteria based on 

legal basis and theoretical studies. 

Furthermore, data collection is carried 

out on each evaluation component. The 

data obtained were then analyzed and 

compared with the evaluation criteria. 

Data that do not match the criteria are 

deepened by conducting interviews to 

find out the causes and the underlying 

reasons and obstacles in achieving the 

criteria. Furthermore, an assessment and 

decision making is carried out on each 

component that is evaluated. The results 

of the analysis of results and decision 

making are then used as the basis for 

improving each component of the 

program and improving and providing 

decisions on program implementation. 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 151 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

 
Figure 1. CIPP model evaluation 

application design 

Based on the scheme in Figure 1 

it can be explained as follows: 

a. The context component is intended to 

record or identify the objective 

conditions of suitability of 

objectives, legal basis and needs 

analysis. From the results of the 

analysis, information can be obtained 

that becomes the basis for making 

decisions to follow up the program. 

b. The input component is intended to 

identify the support resources needed 

to support the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Development and 

Training Center Program. Resource 

support in the form of program 

planning, human resources, 

organizational support, availability 

of facilities and infrastructure, 

availability of funds used to support 

the implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training 

and Development Center Program. 

Furthermore, an analysis of the 

situation is carried out so that it can 

be used as a basis for decision 

making for the stages of program 

implementation. 

c. In the process component, 

identification of the application of 

the Southeast Sulawesi Student 

Sports Training and Development 

Center was carried out. The process 

stages include program 

implementation and supervision. 

Furthermore, an analysis of the 

suitability of the criteria and 

standards set at the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training 

and Development Center was carried 

out. Based on this information a 

decision can be made on the extent to 

which the implementation 

mechanism has been implemented. 

d. In the product component, the 

identification of achievements that have 

been determined in the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program includes 

increasing physical, technical and mental 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 152 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

development so that it can be decided the 

level of success achieved. 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION 

1. Context Evaluation 

Context evaluation includes 

issues related to the program 

environment that has been implemented. 

The context evaluation includes three 

aspects, namely: 1) the objectives of the 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program, 2) the 

legal basis for the Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

Program, and 3) needs analysis. The 

results are presented in table 1 as 

follows: 

Table 1. Context Evaluation Result 

 
 

The findings in the context 

evaluation will discuss the findings on 

indicators 1) the objectives of the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

Program, 2) the legal basis for the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

program, and 3) needs analysis of the 

Central Program. Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Coaching and Training is 

a program to capture and nurture talented 

sports students in order to achieve high 

sports achievements at the national and 

even international levels. The findings 

on the context dimension are 1) there is 

a match between the objectives of the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

Program with the vision and mission, 2) 

the implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Coaching and 

Training Center has a strong legal basis, 

3) with The existence of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Development 

and Training Center Program is in 

accordance with the needs analysis in 

each province. 

2. Input Evaluation 

The input evaluation includes the 

availability of supporting resources for 

the Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center. The 

aspects that become indicators in the 

evaluation of inputs include: 1) the 

availability of program plans, 2) the 

availability of human resources, 3) the 

support of the organizing organization, 

4) the availability of facilities and 

infrastructure, 5) the availability of 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 153 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

funds. The results are presented in table 

2 as follows: 

Table 2. Input Evaluation Result 

 
The results of the input 

evaluation findings are 1) Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Coaching and 

Training Center equipped with the 

availability of training planning 

documents and program guidelines, 2) 

there is a suitability of profiles and 

recruitment processes for athletes, 

coaches at the Student Sports Coaching 

and Training Center. Southeast Sulawesi 

with the criteria set by the Student Sports 

Training and Development Center, 3) to 

support the Southeast Sulawesi Student 

Sports Training and Development 

Center, there has been good cooperation 

between existing stakeholders, namely 

the Youth and Sports Office, Indonesia 

Sport Comitee and the Regional 

Government, 4) Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Development and 

Training Center received adequate 

facilities and infrastructure support, 5) 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

received funding support from the 

APBN, sectoral funding sources, 

regional general allocation funds and 

other self-help. 

3. Process Evaluation 

The results of the process 

evaluation will discuss, among others: 1) 

program implementation, and 2) 

supervision. The results are presented in 

table 3 as follows: 

Table 3. Process Evaluation Process 

 
The results of the process 

evaluation findings will discuss the 

findings on indicators 1) program 

implementation, and 2) supervision. The 

findings that the researchers got on the 

program implementation indicators that 

the Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Coaching and Training Center in the 

implementation of the training program, 

competition implementation, academic 

improvement and welfare were in 

accordance with the provisions of the 

Student Sports Coaching and Training 

Center only improvements are still 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 154 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

needed, among others: (1) in the 

implementation of the exercise there is 

no athlete's pocket book, (2) in the 

implementation of the competition not 

all sports and athletes are dispatched, (3) 

in the implementation of academic 

programs it is necessary to have policies 

related to a special curriculum for 

athletes, (4) in the implementation of the 

welfare program for athletes and 

coaches, it is necessary to increase the 

number and process of disbursement of 

pocket money for athletes and coaches so 

that they are on time. while on the 

monitoring indicators the findings 

obtained are that there is a conformity of 

the evaluation process with the existing 

provisions at the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center. 

4. Product Evaluation 

Product evaluation includes the 

athlete's achievement. Achievement is a 

word used to indicate a person's level of 

achievement in carrying out a series of 

activities. The achievements in this study 

include: 1) increasing 

physical/physiological development, 2) 

increasing technical development, 3) 

increasing mental development. The 

results are presented in table 4 as 

follows: 

Table 4. Product Evaluation Result 

 
The result of product evaluation 

is evaluating achievement. 

Achievements are not only seen from the 

medals obtained during the 

championships between the Center for 

Student Sports Coaching and Training or 

other championships that are followed 

but can be seen from the increase in 

results during the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Coaching and Training 

Center which includes increased 

physical development. , technical 

development and mental development. 

Although the benchmark for the 

achievement of the Student Sports 

Coaching and Training Center is the 

achievement in each championship that 

is participated by the Student Sports 

Coaching and Training Center athletes. 

5. Evaluasi CIPP 

Tabel 5. CIPP Evaluation Result 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 155 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

 
CONCLUSION  

The Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program is a 

program that aims to recruit and nurture 

talented students in the field of sports in 

order to achieve good sports 

achievements at the national and even 

international levels. Based on the 

evaluation that has been carried out using 

the context, input, process and product 

(CIPP) model, several conclusions can 

be drawn, namely as follows: 

Context 

1. The Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Development and 

Training Center program has a match 

between the vision and mission and the 

goals to be achieved. The existence of 

this suitability is important because the 

conformity of the vision and mission will 

be a unified step towards the expected 

goals. 

2. The legal basis for the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center  is 

strong. 

3. There is a suitability of needs 

analysis with the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program, which 

arises because there is a need for an 

athlete nursery at the student level in 

Southeast Sulawesi. 

Input  

1. Program Planning for the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center is 

complemented by the availability of 

training planning documents and 

program guidelines. 

2. The availability of human 

resources is very important for the 

implementation of the Central Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program, in this 

case the availability of quality athletes 

and coaches. The profiles of athletes and 

coaches are in accordance with the 

criteria as prerequisites for athletes and 

coaches at the Student Sports Training 

and Development Center. As for the 

recruitment of athletes and coaches, that 

the recruitment process was carried out 

in accordance with the procedures set out 

at the Student Sports Training and 

Development Center. The suitability of 

the recruitment process is carried out to 

maintain the quality of athletes and 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 156 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

coaches at the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center. 

3. Support of the organizing 

organization as a supporting aspect of the 

implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 

Development Center. In the 

implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Coaching and 

Training Center, it was supported by the 

Youth and Sports Office, Indonesia 

Sport Comittee, and the Regional 

Government. 

4. The availability of facilities 

and infrastructure for the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Coaching and 

Training Center in its implementation 

has received adequate support from the 

Youth and Sports Office, Indonesia 

Sport Comitee, and Pemda and even the 

Ministry of Youth and Sports. 

5. Availability of funds The 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Development and Training Center 

receives financial support from the state 

revenue budget, sectoral funding 

sources, regional general allocation 

funds and other self-help funds. 

Process  

1. The implementation of the 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center 

program in this case includes 1) the 

implementation of training, 2) the 

implementation of competitions, 3) the 

implementation of academic programs, 

4) the implementation of the welfare 

program is in accordance with what is 

planned in the Center for Coaching and 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training only there are improvements in 

certain things as for the following 

improvements: (1) in the implementation 

of the exercise there is no athlete pocket 

book available, (2) in the implementation 

of the competition not all sports and 

athletes are dispatched, ( 3) in the 

implementation of academic programs, it 

is necessary to have policies related to 

special curricula for athletes, (4) in the 

implementation of welfare programs for 

athletes and coaches, it is necessary to 

increase the number and process of 

disbursing athletes and coaches' pocket 

money to be on time. 

2. The monitoring process is 

carried out as a means to evaluate the 

implementation of the Southeast 

Sulawesi Student Sports Training and 

Development Center. This evaluation 

relates to the athlete's performance, the 

coach's performance. In practice, the 

evaluation process is in accordance with 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 157 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

the evaluation process with the 

provisions. 

Product 

1. Student Sports Training and 

Development Center Program The 

Southeast Sulawesi Student Sports 

Training and Development Center is able 

to improve the quality of athletes. 

Athletes from the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Training and 

Development Center have experienced 

increased physical development, 

technical development and mental 

development but have not shown 

maximum performance in competition. 

Achievements are not only seen from the 

medals obtained during the 

championships between the Center for 

Student Sports Coaching and Training or 

other championships that are followed 

but can be seen from the increase in 

results during the Southeast Sulawesi 

Student Sports Coaching and Training 

Center which includes increased 

physical development. Technical 

development and mental development. 

REFERENCES 

Adzalika, A. R. (2019). The 

Evaluation Of Athletes ’ Achievement  

Coaching Program Of 

Measurable Sports ( Athletics , 

Weightlifting , Archery , And Swimming 

) In Lampung Province. 8(1), 56–61. 

Aji, T. (2013). Pola Pembinaan 

Prestasi Pusat Pendidikan dan Latihan 

Pelajar  

( PPLP ) Sepak Takraw Putra 

Jawa Tengah Tahun 2013. 3. 

Amir, F. (2015). Developing 

Structure For Management Of Quality In 

Schools : Steps Towards Quality 

Assurance Systems. 3(8), 977–981. 

Https://Doi.Org/10.12691/Education-3-

8-5 

Arikunto, S. (2013) dasar-dasar 

evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta. Bumi 

Aksara 

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Abdul 

Jabar, Cepi Safrudin. (2014). Evaluasi 

Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoritis 

bagi Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi 

Aksara. 

Azizi Yahaya (2001). "The Using 

of Model Context, Input, Process and 

Product (CIPP) in Learning Program 

Asessment," International Conference 

on 

 Challanges and Prospect in 

Teacher Education, Universitas 

Teknologi Malaysia, Juli, hh. 3. 

Cummings, Rick. (2006). “What 

if: The Counterfactual in Evaluation 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 158 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

Program”. Evaluation Journal 

Australasia. Vol. 6, Spring, h. 6-15 

David Royse, et. al., (2006) 

Program Evaluation an Introduction 

(Toronto: Thomson Brooks,), hh.11. 

Daniel L. Stuflebeam. (2001). 

The In CIPP Model For Evaluation 

(Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers). 

Depdiknas, (2003) Teknik 

Pemanduan Bakat Olahraga, (Jakarta; 

Dirjen Olahraga Depdiknas), hh.10. 

Depdiknas (2002), Pedoman dan 

Modul Pelatihan Kesehatan Olahraga 

bagi Pelatih Olahragawan Pelajar, 

(Jakarta: Depdiknas, PPKJ,), hh. 103. 

Hatfield, J. (2003). Evaluability 

Assessment A Catalyst For Program 

Change And Improvement A Catalyst 

For Program Change. January 2014. 

Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/016327870325

226 

Harshit Topno. (2012). 

“Evaluation of traininig and 

development: An Analysis of Various 

Models”, Journal of Business and 

Manajement Vol 5 (2). 

James A. Williams a ,, Eric A. 

Brown b, Mirannda Kitterlin c, S.B 

(2017) Intaramular Sport Particiapation 

produce self-efficacy in hospitaly 

leaders. Journal of hospitaly and 

Tourism Management. 3(5), 41-52  

James Tangkudung. (2006) 

Kepelatihan Olahraga Pembinaan 

Prestasi Olahraga. (Jakarta: Cerdas 

Jaya), hh. 27 

Joan, S. James. (2013). “An 

Evaluation of the Implementation of 

Aspects of The Revised Jamaican 

Primary Science Curriculum and 

Enactment of Profesional 

Develompment,” Journal of The 

University of The West Indies, Vol 2 (3). 

John A. Mclaughlin, G. B. J. 

(N.D.). Logic Models ] A Tool For 

Telling Your Program | S Performance 

Story. 54–61. 

John M. Owen. (2006) Program 

Evaluation Form and Approach (Crown 

Nest, NSW: Midlands Typesetters), hh. 

48. 

Jopang, J. (2018). Kebijakan 

Pembinaan Atlet Pusat Pendidikan Dan 

Latihan Pelajar Dinas Kepemudaan Dan 

Olah Raga Propinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. 

Journal Publicuho, 1(1), 1. 

https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v1i1.5846 

Juana Budi Aryanto Muslim2. 

(2017). Bevaluasi Penyelenggaraan 

Program Pusat Pendidikan Dan ( Pusat 

Pendidikan dan Latihan Pelajar ). 08(02), 

92–102. 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 159 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

Judith Bennet. (2003). 

Evaluation Methods in Reseach (New 

York:  

Continuum), hh. 30 

Jody L. Fitzpatrick (2004). 

Program Evaluation Alternative 

Approaches and Practical Guidelines 

(Boston: Pearson), hh. 141 

Joy A. Frechtling (2007). Logic 

Modeling Methode in Program 

Evaluation (Arlington: John Wiley & 

Son Inc), hh. 20-43 

James C. Mc David, dan Laura R. 

L. Hawthorn. (2006). Program 

Evaluation and Performance 

Measurement: An Introduction to 

Practice (California: Sage Publication), 

hh. 114 

Kemenpora. (2005). Undang-

Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2005 Sistem 

Keolahragaan Nasional. (Jakarta: 

Kemenpora), hh. 18 

Laura. L, Claire L.(2006). Public 

Program Evaluation: a Statistical guide. 

Armonk New York.. Hl.3 

Margantara, A. F. (2020). 

Evaluasi Program Kegiatan 

Keolahragaan Di Koni Kabupaten 

Kudus. 

Miles Mc Nall, Pennie G Foster 

Fishman. (2007). “Methods of Ripid 

Evaluation Assessment, and Appraisal,” 

American Journal of Evaluation. Vol. 28 

(2). 

Michael Demarteu. (2002). "A 

Theoritical Frame and Grid for Analysis 

of Programe Evaluation Practices," 

Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 8 (4), hh. 

457. 

Nations, U., & Programme, E. 

(2007). Lessons Learned From 

Evaluation A Platform For Sharing 

Knowledge. 2. 

Porteous, N. L., & Stewart, P. J. 

(2002). Introducing Program Teams To 

Logic Models : Facilitating The 

Learning Process. 17(3). 

R. Lance Hogan. (2007). “The 

Historical Development of Program 

Evaluation: Exploring The Past and 

Present.” Online Journal of Workforce 

Educational and Development. Vol. 

2(4), Spring. 

Sandra Mathison, Encyclopedia 

of Evaluation (California: Sage 

Publication, 2005), hh. 90. 

Saputra, A., Keolahragaan, F. I., 

Padang, U. N., Jakarta, U. N., & Artikel, 

I. (2020). Jurnal Performa Olahraga. 5, 

1–5. 

Sandra Mathison. (2005). 

Encyclopedia of Evaluation (California: 

Sage  

Publication), hh. 118 



Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13 (02), June- 160 

La Ode Isa , Johansyah Lubis , Bambang Sujiono  

 

Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami 

Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung: CV. 

Alfabeta), hh.199 

Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi 

Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan 

(Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara), h.62. 

Sugyanto. (2012). Dimensi 

Kajian Ilmu Keolahragaan. Jurnal Sport 

Science, Vol.01. Universitas Negeri 

Yogyakarta. 

Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). 

The Journal Of Asia TEFL The CIPP 

Model : Applications In Language 

Program Evaluation. 16(4), 1360–1367. 

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The 

Cipp Model For Evaluation ! ! ! 

Suharsimi Arikunto dan Cepi, 

S.A.J. (2009). Evaluasi Program 

Pendidikan.  

(Jakarta : Bumi Aksara), hh.1. 

Saryono dan Mekar, D.A. 

(2010). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif 

dalam Bidang Kesehatan (yogyakarta: 

Muha Medika), hh.78 

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2009). 

Evaluasi Program Pendidikan (Jakarta: 

Bumi Aksara), hh.200. 

Tudor O. Bompa. (2005). Theory 

and Metodology of Training, (Dubuque: 

Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company), hh. 

2 

Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation Of 

Training And Development : An 

Analysis Of Various Models. 5(2), 16–

22. 

Wangsa, J. (2017). Evaluasi 

Penyelenggaraan Program PPLP ( Pusat 

Pendidikan  

Dan Latihan Pelajar ).  

Wani, B. (2018). Evaluasi 

Program Pembinaan Prestasi Cabang 

Olahraga  

Tinju Pada Pusat Pembinaan Dan 

Latihan Olahraga Pelajar  

( PPLP ). 5(1), 35–43. 

W. Gulo. (2005). Metode 

Penelitian (Jakarta: PT. Gramedia 

Widiasrana Indonesia), hh.123 

Wiliam Dunn. (2001). Public 

Policy, terjemahan Muhadjir Darwin.  

(Yogyakarta: PT. Hanindita 

Graha Widia), hh. 608 

Yolif Citra Resmi, 2014. (n.d.). 

Yolif Citra. 

Yusrizal, Nuzuli, I. (2015). 

Keberadaan PPLP Olahraga Dayung 

Provinsi Aceh Tahun 2012. 1, 168–176