







































 Global Journal of Education and AlliedResearch (GJEAR) 
Volume 16, Number 2; Febuary 2025; 

ISSN: 2837-3707| Impact Factor: 7.80 

https://zapjournals.com/Journals/index.php/gjear 

Published By: Zendo Academic Publishing 

 

 

pg. 1 

CHALLENGES OF ALIGNING NIGERIA’S NATIONAL CURRICULUM 

WITH GLOBAL STANDARDS WHILE PRESERVING INDIGENOUS 

KNOWLEDGE 
 
   

1Nwafor Alphonsus Onyeachonam, Ph.D. 

 

Article Info  Abstract 

Keywords: Nigeria, National 

Curriculum, Global Standards, 

Indigenous Knowledge, 

Education Reform, Cultural 

Preservation, Hybridisation 

Theory 

DOI 

10.5281/zenodo.17492626 

 The challenge of aligning Nigeria’s national curriculum with global 

standards while preserving indigenous knowledge has become a 

pressing concern in contemporary education discourse. Globalisation 

has intensified the demand for curricula that emphasise skills such as 

digital literacy, scientific innovation, and critical thinking, yet Nigeria 

risks cultural erosion if indigenous values, languages, and community-

based knowledge systems are neglected. This study explores the 

complexities of balancing these competing demands by examining 

Nigeria’s curriculum in relation to international benchmarks and the 

role of indigenous knowledge in shaping identity and sustainable 

development. Guided by Globalisation Theory, Cultural Relativism, 

and Hybridisation Theory, the paper adopts a qualitative and conceptual 

approach, drawing from secondary data including policy documents, 

academic research, and international reports. Findings reveal that 

Nigeria’s curriculum reforms are constrained by weak implementation, 

inadequate teacher preparation, limited infrastructural capacity, and 

insufficient integration of indigenous perspectives. The study 

concludes that achieving a balanced curriculum requires deliberate 

hybridisation of global competencies and local knowledge. It 

recommends targeted teacher development, community participation, 

robust policy integration, and adequate infrastructure investment as 

pathways to harmonisation. Such an approach ensures that Nigeria’s 

education system remains globally relevant while safeguarding cultural 

heritage and fostering national development. 
 

 

1.1 Introduction 

Education is universally recognised as a critical driver of national development, social progress, and global 

competitiveness. In a knowledge-driven economy, the curriculum serves as the principal vehicle through which 

societies transmit values, skills, and competencies to younger generations. For Nigeria, Africa’s most populous 

country and one of its largest economies, the national curriculum is not only an educational roadmap but also a 

strategic instrument for cultivating human capital, preserving cultural heritage, and engaging with global 

 
1 Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Godfrey Okoye University, Enugu 

 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 2 

knowledge systems. However, the imperative to align Nigeria’s curriculum with international benchmarks, while 

simultaneously safeguarding indigenous knowledge, has generated a significant policy and pedagogical dilemma 

(Okebukola, 2021). 

The notion of curriculum alignment with global standards arises from increasing internationalisation of education. 

Globalisation has fostered interconnectedness in educational practices, leading to the diffusion of global 

benchmarks such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 4 on inclusive and equitable 

quality education, the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), and UNESCO’s 

Education 2030 Framework for Action (UNESCO, 2017). These frameworks emphasise competencies such as 

critical thinking, problem-solving, STEM proficiency, digital literacy, creativity, and adaptability qualities 

deemed essential for thriving in a competitive global workforce (Schleicher, 2019). Countries that fail to integrate 

these global trends risk marginalising their learners and undermining their socio-economic development. Nigeria, 

with its persistent developmental challenges and aspirations for global relevance, cannot afford to be left behind. 

At the same time, the Nigerian curriculum must preserve and transmit indigenous knowledge, which encompasses 

local languages, cultural practices, oral traditions, ecological wisdom, and community-based innovations. 

Indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) have been integral to the survival and resilience of African societies for 

centuries, providing solutions in agriculture, medicine, conflict resolution, and environmental management 

(Odora Hoppers, 2019). For Nigeria, a nation with over 250 ethnic groups and a rich cultural heritage, integrating 

indigenous knowledge into formal education is essential for maintaining cultural identity, promoting inclusivity, 

and ensuring sustainability. Scholars argue that educational systems that neglect indigenous epistemologies 

inadvertently contribute to cultural alienation, erosion of identity, and dependency on foreign knowledge systems 

(Iwara, 2020; Adebayo, 2021). 

The tension, however, lies in reconciling the universalist orientation of global education standards with the 

particularist emphasis of indigenous knowledge. Global standards often carry Western epistemological 

underpinnings, privileging scientific rationality, digital technologies, and neoliberal conceptions of productivity. 

In contrast, indigenous knowledge systems are holistic, experiential, and community-oriented, prioritising 

sustainability and cultural continuity (Nakata, 2018). For Nigeria, the challenge is not only about content inclusion 

but also about pedagogical orientation, teacher preparedness, policy consistency, and institutional capacity to 

create a curriculum that reflects both global and local realities. 

This dilemma is exacerbated by structural challenges in Nigeria’s education sector. Despite periodic reforms, 

Nigeria’s curriculum remains criticised for being overloaded, examination-driven, and misaligned with labour 

market needs (Olatunji, 2019). Funding constraints, infrastructural deficits, teacher inadequacies, and weak policy 

implementation mechanisms further hinder the operationalisation of a curriculum that simultaneously meets 

global standards and integrates indigenous knowledge. Moreover, globalisation has accelerated cultural 

homogenisation, heightening the risk of marginalising indigenous languages and cultural practices (Mbah & Ede, 

2022). Without deliberate strategies, Nigeria may either embrace global standards at the expense of local 

relevance or cling to indigenous content while isolating learners from global competitiveness. 

1.2 Statement of the Problem 

Nigeria’s national curriculum faces the challenge of balancing the demand for global competitiveness with the 

preservation of indigenous knowledge. While international standards emphasise skills such as digital literacy, 

critical thinking, and scientific innovation, the curriculum often struggles to adequately integrate these 

competencies. At the same time, indigenous knowledge, which embodies local languages, cultural heritage, and 

community-based wisdom, remains underrepresented, risking cultural erosion. Weak policy implementation, 

inadequate teacher preparation, and infrastructural gaps further complicate the situation. This creates a dilemma 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 3 

where Nigeria risks global irrelevance if it neglects international standards, or cultural disconnection if indigenous 

knowledge is ignored. 

1.3 Research Objectives 

The objectives are to: (i) examine the historical and contemporary evolution of Nigeria’s national curriculum, (ii) 

analyse the requirements of global educational standards, (iii) explore the role of indigenous knowledge in 

Nigerian education, (iv) identify the challenges of harmonising global and indigenous imperatives, and (v) 

propose strategies for achieving curriculum balance. 

1.4 Research Question 

The question guiding this article is: How can Nigeria align its national curriculum with global standards without 

eroding indigenous knowledge systems?  

Literature Review 

2.1 Conceptual Clarifications 

Curriculum 

The term curriculum has been defined in multiple ways depending on context and scholarly orientation. Broadly, 

it refers to the totality of learning experiences that educational institutions provide to learners in order to achieve 

desired goals (Kelly, 2009). For Nigeria, the curriculum is a reflection of the nation’s philosophy of education 

and its development aspirations, serving as both a roadmap for knowledge transmission and a tool for social 

transformation. The Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) defines the curriculum 

as all planned learning experiences provided by schools to enable learners acquire desirable knowledge, skills, 

and values for national development (NERDC, 2013). Globally, curricula increasingly emphasise competencies 

such as problem-solving, adaptability, and digital literacy, thus reflecting the realities of a rapidly changing world 

(Schleicher, 2019). 

Global Standards in Education 

Global standards in education are benchmarks and frameworks promoted by international organisations and 

widely adopted by countries to improve quality and comparability of educational outcomes. These include 

UNESCO’s Education 2030 Agenda, which advocates inclusive and equitable education, the OECD’s Programme 

for International Student Assessment (PISA), which measures key competencies of learners, and the World 

Bank’s Human Capital Index, which evaluates how education contributes to national productivity (UNESCO, 

2017; OECD, 2020). Global standards prioritise knowledge and skills that prepare learners to participate 

effectively in the global economy, while also fostering values of tolerance, equity, and sustainability. 

Indigenous Knowledge 

Indigenous knowledge (IK) refers to the complex set of understandings, skills, philosophies, and practices 

developed by communities over time through interactions with their environment. It is context-specific, holistic, 

orally transmitted, and often embedded in cultural and spiritual life (Odora Hoppers, 2019). In Nigeria, indigenous 

knowledge includes traditional medicine, folklore, agriculture, oral literature, languages, and ecological wisdom. 

It sustains cultural identity, strengthens resilience, and provides locally relevant solutions to societal challenges 

(Adebayo, 2021). Integrating indigenous knowledge into education is therefore crucial for ensuring cultural 

continuity and promoting sustainable development. 

2.2 Theoretical Framework 

A robust theoretical grounding is essential for understanding the tension between aligning with global standards 

and preserving indigenous knowledge. This paper draws upon three complementary theories: Globalisation 

Theory, Cultural Relativism, and Hybridisation Theory. 

 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 4 

Globalisation Theory 

Globalisation theory explains the increasing interconnectedness of economies, cultures, and knowledge systems 

across the world (Held & McGrew, 2007). In education, it highlights how countries adopt similar curricula, 

pedagogical methods, and standards to remain competitive in the global economy. According to Spring (2015), 

globalisation has led to the spread of educational models that prioritise scientific rationality, digital skills, and 

employability. For Nigeria, globalisation theory underscores the need to align the national curriculum with 

international benchmarks to produce graduates who can compete globally. However, critics argue that uncritical 

adoption of global standards risks marginalising local knowledge and deepening cultural dependency. 

Cultural Relativism 

Cultural relativism posits that all cultural systems have intrinsic value and must be understood within their own 

contexts (Herskovits, 1972). Applied to curriculum studies, it advocates for the preservation of indigenous 

epistemologies and practices within formal education. From this perspective, Nigerian education should not 

simply emulate Western standards but should also reflect the cultural heritage, values, and worldviews of its 

people. Cultural relativism provides the philosophical basis for integrating indigenous knowledge into the 

curriculum, ensuring that education remains relevant to local contexts while resisting cultural homogenisation. 

Hybridisation Theory 

Hybridisation theory offers a middle ground by recognising that global and local knowledge systems can be 

combined to create new, contextually appropriate forms of education (Pieterse, 2009). In curriculum development, 

this means blending global competencies with indigenous content to achieve both international relevance and 

local authenticity. For example, Nigeria can incorporate digital literacy alongside indigenous languages, or 

combine modern environmental science with traditional ecological knowledge. Hybridisation thus addresses the 

limitations of both globalisation and cultural relativism by promoting a curriculum that is adaptive, inclusive, and 

innovative. 

 
A visual diagram of the Conceptual and Theoretical Framework, showing how Globalisation Theory and Cultural 

Relativism intersect and are synthesised through Hybridisation Theory, which serves as the anchoring framework 

for your study. 

 

 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 5 

 

Nigeria’s National Curriculum in Context 

3.1 Historical Evolution of Nigeria’s Curriculum 

The evolution of Nigeria’s national curriculum reflects the country’s political history, socio-economic realities, 

and global educational influences. During the colonial era, education was largely designed to produce clerks, 

interpreters, and low-level administrators for the colonial administration. The curriculum was heavily Eurocentric, 

focusing on literacy, numeracy, and religious instruction, with little regard for indigenous knowledge or local 

needs (Fafunwa, 2004). Post-independence reforms sought to reorient education towards national development, 

self-reliance, and cultural identity. 

One of the most significant milestones was the introduction of the 6-3-3-4 system under the National Policy on 

Education (1977, revised 1981, 1998, and 2013), which aimed to balance general education with technical and 

vocational training. The Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) became the central 

body responsible for curriculum development and review, ensuring that the curriculum was not only nationally 

relevant but also responsive to global trends. Despite these efforts, critics argue that many of the reforms have 

been more rhetorical than practical, as implementation challenges persist (Olatunji, 2019). 

3.2 Current Structure of the Curriculum 

The Nigerian curriculum is structured in line with the 9-3-4 system of education, comprising nine years of basic 

education (six years of primary and three years of junior secondary), three years of senior secondary, and four 

years of tertiary education. 

Basic Education Curriculum (BEC): At the primary and junior secondary levels, the curriculum integrates 

subjects into broad themes such as science and technology, religion and national values, and cultural and creative 

arts. It is designed to promote literacy, numeracy, life skills, and foundational knowledge. 

Senior Secondary Curriculum: This level provides specialisation, offering subjects across fields such as 

sciences, humanities, business, and technical education. In recent revisions, emphasis has been placed on 

entrepreneurship education to address unemployment challenges. 

Tertiary Education Curriculum: Managed by institutions under the oversight of the National Universities 

Commission (NUC), National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), and National Commission for Colleges of 

Education (NCCE), the tertiary curriculum has increasingly integrated global trends such as ICT, research skills, 

and innovation. Despite these structures, misalignment persists between the curriculum and labour market needs, 

leading to concerns over graduate unemployment and skill mismatches (Olawale, 2020). 

3.3 Goals of the Curriculum and National Policy on Education 

The National Policy on Education outlines several goals for the Nigerian curriculum, including: 

1. Development of the individual into a morally sound, patriotic, and effective citizen. 

2. Provision of opportunities for all citizens to acquire functional literacy and life skills. 

3. Preparation of learners for self-reliance and national development. 

4. Promotion of national unity while respecting cultural diversity. 

5. Equipping learners with the competencies required for global competitiveness. 

These goals demonstrate a dual ambition: fostering global standards while retaining cultural and national identity. 

However, achieving this balance has proven difficult due to competing pressures of globalisation and local 

realities. 

3.4 Achievements of the Nigerian Curriculum 

Despite its challenges, the Nigerian curriculum has recorded notable achievements. It has broadened access to 

education through the Universal Basic Education (UBE) programme, mainstreamed subjects such as civic 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 6 

education and entrepreneurship, and incorporated cross-cutting issues like HIV/AIDS awareness and 

environmental education. Additionally, periodic reviews by the NERDC have attempted to keep the curriculum 

responsive to emerging trends. For example, ICT has been introduced as a compulsory subject at the basic level, 

reflecting global technological shifts (NERDC, 2013). 

Nevertheless, these achievements remain uneven, with rural schools often lagging behind urban counterparts in 

terms of resources and quality of delivery. Furthermore, the integration of indigenous knowledge into the 

curriculum has been minimal and often tokenistic, limited to subjects such as cultural and creative arts, local 

languages, or history. 

3.5 Persistent Gaps and Criticisms 

Several gaps remain in Nigeria’s curriculum. First, it has been criticised for being overloaded, with too many 

subjects, thereby overwhelming learners and teachers (Okebukola, 2021). Second, implementation is weak due 

to inadequate teacher training, poor instructional resources, and insufficient monitoring. Third, there is inadequate 

integration of vocational and technical education, despite the country’s high unemployment rate. Finally, 

indigenous knowledge is not sufficiently embedded in mainstream curricula, leading to a disconnect between 

formal education and the socio-cultural realities of learners (Adebayo, 2021). These gaps underscore the need for 

reforms that balance global imperatives with local priorities. Without deliberate integration of indigenous 

knowledge and alignment with global competencies, the Nigerian curriculum risks producing graduates who are 

neither globally competitive nor locally grounded. 

4. Global Standards in Education 

Global standards in education refer to internationally recognised frameworks, policies, and practices that seek to 

ensure the quality, relevance, and comparability of learning outcomes across nations. These standards emphasise 

competencies such as critical thinking, digital literacy, collaboration, creativity, and problem-solving, which are 

increasingly essential in the 21st-century knowledge economy (UNESCO, 2021). The drive towards global 

standards has been influenced by international benchmarks, including the United Nations Sustainable 

Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), which calls for inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning 

opportunities for all (United Nations, 2015). Similarly, initiatives such as the Programme for International Student 

Assessment (PISA) and the International Baccalaureate (IB) have become yardsticks for measuring and aligning 

educational outcomes across different regions (OECD, 2019). 

One of the defining features of global standards is the prioritisation of skills over rote memorisation. While many 

developing countries continue to emphasise content-heavy curricula, global frameworks encourage inquiry-based 

learning, digital competence, and adaptability to rapidly changing technological environments (Schleicher, 2018). 

Moreover, global education standards often advocate for equity and inclusivity, ensuring that gender, disability, 

and socio-economic status do not hinder access to quality education (UNESCO, 2022). These principles are 

increasingly relevant in contexts such as Nigeria, where disparities in access and quality remain significant. 

However, critics argue that global standards risk imposing a one-size-fits-all model that may not fully account for 

local cultural and historical contexts. Some scholars note that an overemphasis on international benchmarks could 

inadvertently marginalise indigenous knowledge systems and undervalue local educational traditions (Tikly, 

2020). Therefore, while alignment with global standards is crucial for competitiveness, it must be carefully 

adapted to avoid cultural homogenisation and the loss of educational sovereignty. 

In this regard, many countries have sought to localise global standards, adapting them in ways that harmonise 

international competencies with national priorities. For Nigeria, the challenge lies in adopting global benchmarks 

while tailoring them to reflect the nation’s socio-cultural realities, linguistic diversity, and indigenous knowledge 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 7 

systems. The process requires not only curriculum redesign but also teacher training, infrastructural investment, 

and policy reforms that ensure a balance between global relevance and local authenticity. 

4.1 Case Studies: Translating Global Standards into Local Curriculum Practice 

Finland: Competence-Based Learning with Local Autonomy 

Finland consistently performs strongly on international assessments while resisting hyper-standardisation. The 

National Core Curriculum emphasises transversal competencies (e.g., thinking skills, multiliteracy, ICT 

competence), phenomenon-based learning, and extensive teacher autonomy to localise content (Finnish National 

Board of Education [FNBE], 2016; Sahlberg, 2011). Municipalities and schools design local curricula that 

interpret national goals through community priorities, allowing indigenous languages (Swedish, Sámi) and local 

culture to permeate schooling. The lesson for Nigeria is that clear national competency goals + strong local 

curriculum ownership + high-quality teacher education can achieve international comparability without erasing 

locality. 

 

 

Singapore: Global Benchmarks, “Teach Less, Learn More,” and Values in Action 

Singapore aligns tightly with global competencies (STEM, ICT, problem-solving) but embeds them within a 

values-driven framework “21st Century Competencies” and Values in Action to cultivate civic identity and social 

cohesion (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2015). Strategic initiatives like Skills Future connect upper-

secondary and post-secondary curricula with labour-market needs while maintaining Mother Tongue Languages 

(Mandarin, Malay, Tamil) to safeguard cultural identity. Singapore shows how systems coherence, targeted 

teacher development, and bilingual policy can deliver globally benchmarked outcomes without cultural dilution. 

South Korea: High Standards with Iterative Curriculum Renewal 

South Korea’s curriculum cycles (e.g., the 2015 Revised National Curriculum) focus on core competencies, 

digital literacy, and creativity, informed by PISA and TIMSS evidence (Korea Institute for Curriculum and 

Evaluation [KICE], 2016). A sustained pipeline from teacher selection to rigorous professional learning supports 

implementation. Despite pressure from high-stakes exams, recent reforms broaden experiential learning and 

character education, signalling a move from rote learning to balanced competence development. Nigeria can draw 

from Korea’s iterative review culture and implementation discipline to move beyond policy documents to 

classroom practice. 

New Zealand: Alignment with Māori Knowledge through Te Tiriti Obligations 

New Zealand’s New Zealand Curriculum is competency-based and deliberately flexible, enabling local 

curriculum design (“local curriculum”) by schools (Ministry of Education New Zealand, 2007/2020). The 

companion framework Te Marautanga o Aotearoa and strategies like Ka Hikitia embed Mātauranga Māori (Māori 

knowledge), Te Reo Māori, and culturally sustaining pedagogy (Ministry of Education New Zealand, 2020). This 

architecture demonstrates that bicultural commitments, legal recognition of indigenous rights, and dual 

curriculum pathways can harmonise global competencies with indigenous knowledge an instructive model for 

Nigeria’s multilingual, multi-ethnic context. 

South Africa: CAPS, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Inclusion 

South Africa’s Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) integrate learning outcomes aligned to 

global expectations while national policy explicitly recognises Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) 

(Department of Science and Technology, 2004; Department of Basic Education, 2011). Practical infusion appears 

in Natural Sciences (e.g., traditional medicine, ethnobotany), History, and Languages. Progress is uneven teacher 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 8 

preparedness and resources vary but the policy infrastructure legitimises IKS in formal schooling. Nigeria can 

adapt this policy recognition + subject infusion approach, backed by teacher guides and community partnerships. 

India: NEP 2020 Competency Focus with Classical/Local Languages 

India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 shifts towards competency-based learning, flexible pathways, and 

holistic, multilingual education. It promotes mother-tongue/region-language instruction in early grades and 

elevates Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) (e.g., yoga, Ayurveda, classical arts) in higher education and research 

(Government of India, 2020). Large-scale roll-out hinges on teacher training and state capacity, but NEP offers a 

blueprint for balancing global readiness with civilisational knowledge relevant to Nigeria’s ambition to elevate 

indigenous languages and knowledge domains. 

Cross-Cutting Lessons for Nigeria 

1. Competency Clarity + Local Flexibility: Finland and New Zealand show that a tight national focus on 

competencies paired with school/municipal curriculum autonomy sustains local identity and responsiveness. 

2. Bilingual/Multilingual Policy: Singapore and India illustrate how mother-tongue policies can coexist with 

English-medium global competitiveness vital for Nigeria’s indigenous languages. 

3. Indigenous Knowledge Legitimacy: New Zealand’s dual frameworks and South Africa’s IKS policy 

demonstrate the power of formal recognition, dedicated curricula, and teacher resources for indigenous content. 

4. Implementation Discipline: South Korea underlines iterative review, teacher quality, and assessment 

realignment areas where Nigeria must strengthen capacity. 

5. System Coherence: Align standards, teacher education, textbooks, assessment, and inspection toward the 

same competency-and-culture goals; avoid fragmented reforms. 

5. Indigenous Knowledge in Nigeria 

Indigenous knowledge (IK) in Nigeria encompasses the cumulative body of skills, practices, beliefs, and 

innovations developed by local communities through interaction with their environment and cultural heritage. It 

is transmitted orally and experientially across generations, often embedded in language, folklore, proverbs, arts, 

agriculture, traditional medicine, and communal practices (Okeke, 2019). As a multicultural nation with over 250 

ethnic groups, Nigeria possesses a rich and diverse corpus of indigenous knowledge that reflects the values, 

spirituality, and social structures of its people (Eboh, 2018). 

In education, indigenous knowledge provides cultural grounding, identity formation, and contextually relevant 

learning for students. It fosters critical life skills, such as problem-solving within local realities, environmental 

stewardship, and intergenerational solidarity (Agrawal, 2009). For instance, indigenous agricultural knowledge, 

such as yam cultivation techniques in Igboland or millet preservation methods in Northern Nigeria, demonstrates 

sustainable practices that modern science continues to validate. Similarly, traditional medicine and oral literature 

contain insights into health, moral development, and conflict resolution that remain pertinent in contemporary 

society. 

Despite its value, indigenous knowledge is underrepresented in Nigeria’s formal curriculum. The national 

education system remains heavily oriented towards Western paradigms, often marginalising local epistemologies 

in favour of global frameworks (Adegbija, 2019). Subjects like history and cultural studies, where IK could be 

systematically embedded, have at times been deprioritised, raising fears of cultural erosion and disconnection 

among younger generations. Additionally, challenges such as lack of documentation, inadequate teacher training, 

and the perception of IK as “inferior” to Western knowledge exacerbate its exclusion (Nwafor, 2020). 

Integrating indigenous knowledge into the national curriculum holds significant potential for sustainable 

development and cultural preservation. It ensures that education is not only globally competitive but also locally 

meaningful, enabling learners to navigate international contexts without losing their cultural identity. 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 9 

Furthermore, alignment with indigenous perspectives can enhance community engagement in education, making 

schooling more relevant to local needs. Nigeria, therefore, stands at a critical juncture: to design a curriculum that 

leverages indigenous wisdom while adopting global standards to prepare learners for the demands of the 21st 

century. 

6. Challenges of Aligning Nigeria’s Curriculum with Global Standards While Preserving Indigenous 

Knowledge 

Aligning Nigeria’s national curriculum with global standards while safeguarding indigenous knowledge presents 

a complex dilemma shaped by structural, cultural, and policy-related challenges. Although the ambition is to 

produce globally competitive graduates who remain culturally grounded, several obstacles hinder effective 

integration. 

6.1 Policy Inconsistencies and Weak Implementation 

Frequent changes in education policies and lack of continuity in curriculum reforms undermine coherence. 

Policies that emphasise indigenous knowledge, such as the inclusion of Nigerian languages and cultural studies, 

often suffer from poor implementation due to political instability, limited funding, or weak monitoring 

mechanisms (Obanya, 2019). As a result, global frameworks are often adopted superficially, while indigenous 

elements remain tokenistic. 

6.2 Perceived Inferiority of Indigenous Knowledge 

A persistent challenge is the societal perception of indigenous knowledge as inferior to Western paradigms. Many 

parents, policymakers, and even teachers prioritise English-medium instruction and Western scientific knowledge 

as the gateway to global competitiveness (Adegbija, 2019). This perception relegates indigenous languages, oral 

literature, and traditional practices to informal domains, leaving them marginalised in formal schooling. 

6.3 Teacher Preparedness and Professional Development 

Teachers play a central role in curriculum delivery, yet many lack the training to integrate indigenous knowledge 

into pedagogy while also adopting global competencies. Teacher education programmes rarely emphasise 

bilingual or multicultural instructional strategies, creating a gap between policy aspirations and classroom realities 

(Okeke & Nwankwo, 2020). Without professional development, efforts at integration remain superficial. 

6.4 Infrastructural and Resource Constraints 

Effective curriculum implementation requires adequate infrastructure, teaching materials, and technology. 

Nigeria faces chronic underfunding in education, with schools often lacking libraries, laboratories, or digital tools 

necessary to teach global competencies (Odukoya et al., 2018). At the same time, there is a shortage of 

documented indigenous knowledge resources, particularly textbooks and teaching guides, which limits systematic 

integration. 

6.5 Tension Between Standardisation and Local Diversity 

Global standards emphasise comparability across nations, often through standardised assessments such as PISA. 

However, Nigeria’s cultural and linguistic diversity makes uniform curriculum design challenging. Striking a 

balance between standardisation for global competitiveness and localisation to reflect indigenous realities creates 

ongoing tension (Tikly, 2020). This tension risks homogenising diverse local contexts or diluting global 

benchmarks. 

6.6 Influence of Globalisation and Digitalisation 

Globalisation and digitalisation expose learners to global cultures, values, and knowledge systems, sometimes at 

the expense of local traditions. The widespread adoption of Western curricula in private schools in Nigeria reflects 

the demand for globally recognised qualifications (e.g., Cambridge IGCSE, IB) (Uche & Ogbonnaya, 2017). 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 10 

While these pathways enhance global mobility, they often neglect indigenous knowledge, exacerbating cultural 

disconnection. 

 

6.7 Political Will and Stakeholder Engagement 

Sustaining curriculum reforms requires strong political will and the active involvement of stakeholders, including 

communities, traditional leaders, and parents. In Nigeria, weak collaboration between government agencies and 

local communities often sidelines indigenous voices in curriculum design (Eboh, 2018). This exclusion hinders 

ownership and sustainability of reforms that seek to integrate both global standards and indigenous knowledge. 

Strategies for Harmonising Global Standards with Indigenous Knowledge in Nigeria’s Curriculum 

Addressing the dual imperative of aligning with global standards while preserving indigenous knowledge requires 

a holistic approach that combines policy reforms, pedagogical innovation, and stakeholder engagement. Several 

strategies can support Nigeria in achieving this balance. 

7.1 Policy Integration and Curriculum Reform 

Nigeria needs coherent education policies that deliberately integrate indigenous knowledge within globally 

benchmarked curricula. This can be achieved through frameworks that highlight competency-based learning 

while embedding local content such as folklore, traditional sciences, and cultural practices. Establishing clear 

policy mandates for bilingual and multicultural education can ensure both global relevance and cultural continuity 

(UNESCO, 2021). 

7.2 Teacher Training and Professional Development 

Teachers are central to translating curriculum intentions into classroom realities. Teacher education institutions 

should integrate indigenous knowledge methodologies alongside global pedagogical strategies. Continuous 

professional development in multicultural pedagogy, bilingual instruction, and indigenous content integration will 

empower teachers to create balanced learning environments (Okeke & Nwankwo, 2020). 

7.3 Documentation and Resource Development 

A critical step in mainstreaming indigenous knowledge is systematic documentation. Collaboration between 

universities, local communities, and cultural institutions can generate textbooks, digital archives, and multimedia 

content that capture Nigeria’s rich indigenous knowledge. These resources can be incorporated into subjects such 

as science, history, and civic education, bridging traditional wisdom with modern competencies (Eboh, 2018). 

7.4 Assessment Reform 

Standardised assessments often privilege rote learning and global benchmarks at the expense of local knowledge. 

Nigeria’s assessment system should be redesigned to capture both 21st-century competencies and indigenous 

knowledge-based skills, such as problem-solving in agriculture, local crafts, and community-based decision-

making. This dual assessment model would value cultural knowledge while ensuring international comparability 

(Schleicher, 2018). 

7.5 Community Engagement and Stakeholder Collaboration 

Communities are the custodians of indigenous knowledge. Their active participation in curriculum development 

can ensure authenticity and sustainability. Strengthening partnerships between policymakers, educators, parents, 

and traditional leaders will foster ownership and ensure that curriculum reforms reflect both global standards and 

local realities (Tikly, 2020). 

7.6 Leveraging Technology for Integration 

Digital platforms can serve as powerful tools for preserving and teaching indigenous knowledge. E-learning 

modules, mobile apps, and online repositories can make local knowledge accessible to younger generations while 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 11 

also connecting learners to global content. Blended approaches that combine global online resources with locally 

developed digital archives will promote both competitiveness and cultural pride (UNESCO, 2022). 

 

 

7.7 Incremental and Context-Specific Implementation 

Rather than wholesale adoption of global models, Nigeria can pursue incremental reforms tailored to its unique 

socio-cultural and economic contexts. Pilot projects in selected regions, followed by phased nationwide scaling, 

can help identify best practices and adapt them for diverse local settings. This flexible approach reduces resistance 

and enhances the likelihood of success. 

Methodology 

This study adopts a qualitative and conceptual research design. It relies on secondary data drawn from peer-

reviewed journal articles, Nigerian education policy documents, and reports from international organisations such 

as UNESCO and the OECD. Sources were selected based on relevance and credibility, with priority given to 

recent works (2015–2023), while older texts were included where they offered foundational insights. 

The analysis followed a thematic review approach, categorising issues under global standards, indigenous 

knowledge, challenges, and strategies for harmonisation. This allowed for the synthesis of diverse perspectives 

and the identification of policy and practice gaps. The study was guided by Globalisation Theory, Cultural 

Relativism, and Hybridisation Theory, which together provided the conceptual framework for interpreting 

findings and shaping recommendations. 

Conclusion 

This study examined the challenges of aligning Nigeria’s national curriculum with global standards while 

preserving indigenous knowledge. It established that Nigeria faces a dual dilemma: the need to modernise its 

curriculum to meet international benchmarks in science, technology, and innovation, while ensuring that 

indigenous languages, values, and cultural practices are not marginalised. The analysis showed that inadequate 

policy implementation, weak teacher capacity, infrastructural gaps, and limited integration of indigenous 

perspectives hinder effective curriculum reform. Anchored on Globalisation, Cultural Relativism, and 

Hybridisation theories, the study highlights that sustainable curriculum development requires a balanced approach 

that embraces global best practices without eroding cultural identity. 

Recommendations 

i.Curriculum reform should deliberately blend global competencies such as digital literacy with indigenous 

knowledge systems, ensuring mutual reinforcement rather than exclusion. 

ii.Continuous training programmes should be designed to equip teachers with skills for integrating global and local 

content. 

iii.Local stakeholders, including traditional institutions and cultural custodians, should be actively engaged in 

curriculum design and implementation. 

iv.Adequate funding should be channelled into educational technology and local resource development to support 

curriculum delivery. 

v.Regular review mechanisms should be established to track curriculum effectiveness in balancing global standards 

with cultural preservation. 

References 

Adebayo, T. (2021). Indigenous knowledge and education in Africa: Towards a decolonised curriculum. Ibadan: 

Spectrum Books. 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 12 

Adegbija, E. (2019). Language policy and planning in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Nigerian 

Languages and Culture, 21(2), 45–61. 

Agrawal, A. (2009). Why “indigenous” knowledge? Anthropological Quarterly, 77(3), 413–422. 

https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2004.0074 

Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS). Republic of 

South Africa. 

Department of Science and Technology. (2004). Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) Policy. Republic of South 

Africa. 

Eboh, M. (2018). Indigenous knowledge systems and sustainable development in Africa. African Research 

Review, 12(4), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v12i4.11 

Fafunwa, A. B. (2004). History of education in Nigeria. Ibadan: NPS Educational Publishers. 

Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. FNBE. 

Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Human Resource Development. 

Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2007). Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies. Cambridge: Polity Press. 

Herskovits, M. J. (1972). Cultural relativism: Perspectives in cultural pluralism. New York: Random House. 

Iwara, A. U. (2020). Repositioning indigenous knowledge in Nigerian education: Issues and prospects. African 

Journal of Educational Research and Development, 14(2), 45–58. 

Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). London: SAGE. 

Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2016). 2015 Revised National Curriculum: Key Competency 

Framework. KICE. 

Mbah, P., & Ede, V. (2022). Globalisation and cultural identity in Africa: Implications for curriculum studies. 

Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 19(3), 88–102. 

Ministry of Education New Zealand. (2007/2020). The New Zealand Curriculum (including 2020 updates). 

Ministry of Education. 

Ministry of Education New Zealand. (2020). Ka Hikitia—Ka Hāpaitia: The Māori Education Strategy. Ministry 

of Education. 

Ministry of Education Singapore. (2015). 21st Century Competencies and Student Outcomes; Values in Action. 

Ministry of Education. 

Nakata, M. (2018). Reconciling global and indigenous knowledges in curriculum studies. International Journal 

of Educational Development, 61, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.003 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 13 

NERDC. (2013). National Policy on Education. Lagos: Nigerian Educational Research and Development 

Council. 

Nwafor, O. (2020). Indigenous education and curriculum development in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. 

Nigerian Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 88–101. 

Obanya, P. (2019). The dilemma of education in Africa. African Journal of Education and Development Studies, 

6(1), 1–15. 

Odora Hoppers, C. A. (2019). Integrating indigenous knowledge into education: Beyond the African Renaissance. 

Pretoria: HSRC Press. 

Odukoya, J. A., Adekeye, O. A., Igbinoba, A. O., & Adebayo, D. O. (2018). Education in Nigeria: Challenges 

and prospects. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p260 

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. 

https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en 

OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing. 

Okebukola, P. (2021). Curriculum reforms in Nigeria: Achievements, challenges and prospects. Nigerian Journal 

of Curriculum Studies, 28(1), 1–15. 

Okeke, C. (2019). Oral tradition and knowledge transmission in Africa. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 31(1), 

72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2018.1505061 

Okeke, C., & Nwankwo, F. (2020). Teacher education and the integration of indigenous knowledge in Nigeria: 

Opportunities and challenges. Nigerian Journal of Teacher Education, 19(1), 55–72. 

Olatunji, S. (2019). Curriculum and national development in Nigeria: Historical perspectives and contemporary 

issues. Educational Review, 71(6), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1509137 

Olawale, O. (2020). Graduate unemployment in Nigeria: Curriculum relevance and labour market outcomes. 

African Journal of Education and Development Studies, 17(2), 55–70. 

Pieterse, J. N. (2009). Globalization and culture: Global mélange (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 

Robertson, R. (2012). Globalisation: Social theory and global culture. London: SAGE. 

Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers 

College Press. 

Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing. 

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en 

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing. 

Spring, J. (2015). Globalization of education: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. 



                                                                 Global Journal of Education and Allied Research (GJEAR) Vol. 16 (2) 

pg. 14 

Tikly, L. (2020). Education for sustainable development in Africa: A critique of regional agendas. Compare: A 

Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(4), 442–459. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1545892 

Uche, R., & Ogbonnaya, N. (2017). The influence of globalisation on private secondary education in Nigeria. 

International Journal of Education and Practice, 5(11), 185–195. 

https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2017.511.185.195 

UNESCO. (2017). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of 

Sustainable Development Goal 4. Paris: UNESCO. 

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. 

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 

UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Inclusion and education. UNESCO. 

https://www.unesco.org/gem-report 

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United 

Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda 

 


