


































Global Research in Higher Education 
ISSN 2576-196X (Print) ISSN 2576-1951 (Online) 

Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe 

43 

 

Original Paper 

Research on the Reform and Practice of the “Bridge 

Engineering” Course in the Digital and Intelligent Era 

Aihong Qin
1
, Sai Zhang

1
, Wenting Hua

1
, Liya Han

1
, Linlin Ma

1
 & Shouling Luan

1
 

1
 Qingdao City University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China 

 

Received: September 7, 2025    Accepted: September 26, 2025    Online Published: October 8, 2025 

doi:10.22158/grhe.v8n3p43               URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v8n3p43 

 

Abstract 

In the digital and intelligent era, the traditional “Bridge Engineering” course is confronted with 

practical dilemmas such as outdated knowledge systems and disconnection between practical teaching 

and real-world needs. This study integrates cutting-edge technologies like BIM and knowledge graphs, 

establishes a dedicated WeChat official account platform for the “Bridge Engineering” course, and 

builds an intelligent construction workshop with virtual-real interaction. Through these efforts, it 

systematically reorganizes the course content, constructs a digital platform, and implements 

industry-education integration practices. By adopting the three-stage progressive teaching model of 

“Exploring Bridges-Investigating Bridges-Creating Bridges”, a trinity course system of 

“Culture-Technology-Innovation” is built. Ultimately, an engaging course centered on the core 

concept of “Discovering Your Beauty Through Bridges” is realized. 

Keywords 

digitalization and Intelligence, bridge Engineering, course Reconstruction, intelligent Construction 

 

1. Introduction 

With the advent of the digital and intelligent era, a new generation of information technologies such as 

artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things is profoundly transforming 

the design, construction, and operation and maintenance modes of the bridge engineering industry. The 

“Bridge Engineering” course is a core course for the road and bridge engineering direction in the civil 

engineering major. The traditional “Bridge Engineering” course system takes structural mechanics, 

material science, and construction technology as its core. However, its teaching content and methods 

are relatively rigid, making it difficult to meet the demand for interdisciplinary and innovative talents in 

the digital and intelligent era. Currently, universities at home and abroad tend to focus on theoretical 

knowledge in the teaching philosophy of the bridge engineering course, while paying insufficient 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

44 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

attention to the cultivation of practical abilities and innovative thinking. 

Against this background, this paper proposes an innovative exploration based on the teaching 

philosophy of “Discovering Your Beauty Through Bridges”. It constructs this teaching philosophy 

through three integrations: discipline integration, technology integration, and industry-education 

integration. 

 

Figure 1. Teaching Philosophy 

 

1.1 Underlying Logic of Discipline Integration and Support for Smart Courses 

The core concept of discipline integration lies in breaking down disciplinary barriers, constructing an 

interdisciplinary knowledge system, and cultivating students’ ability to analyze and solve complex 

bridge engineering problems from a multi-disciplinary perspective. By using AI-driven knowledge 

graphs to demonstrate the internal connections between disciplines such as mechanics, materials, and 

environmental protection in bridge engineering, the underlying logic of discipline integration is 

established. Meanwhile, interdisciplinary expansion modules are added to the “Bridge Engineering” 

course to realize the support of discipline integration for smart courses. For example, a computer 

science module is added to the bridge engineering course, teaching bridge modeling, simulation 

analysis, and optimization design (such as finite element analysis, BIM technology, MIDAS CIVIL 

technology, etc.). 

1.2 Teaching Philosophy of the “Bridge Engineering” Course Based On Technology Integration 

Modern bridge engineering is developing towards intelligence, digitalization, and sustainability. 

Emerging technologies (such as BIM, the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, and big data 

analysis) are playing an increasingly important role in bridge design, construction, and operation and 

maintenance. The core concept of technology integration is to deeply integrate modern technologies 

with traditional bridge engineering teaching, enhance students’ technology application capabilities and 

innovative abilities, and enable them to adapt to the technological development trend of future bridge 

engineering. For example, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies are used to 

simulate bridge construction processes or disaster scenarios (such as earthquakes and floods). Through 

VR simulation of the entire bridge construction process (such as construction safety scenarios and 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

45 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

structural load tests), students can intuitively understand mechanical principles and environmental 

impacts; AR technology can overlay the internal structure of bridges (such as the layout of prestressed 

steel bars) onto real scenes. By introducing digital and intelligent technologies, a knowledge graph for 

the “Bridge Engineering” course is created on the Chaoxing Learning Platform, which systematically 

sorts out and displays the complex knowledge points and their relationships in the course. 

1.3 Teaching Philosophy of the “Bridge Engineering” Course Based On Industry-Education 

Integration 

Bridge engineering is a highly practical discipline, and industry demands and technological 

development are changing with each passing day. The core concept of industry-education integration is 

to integrate industry needs, engineering practices, and industry standards into course teaching through 

school-enterprise cooperation. This ensures that the teaching content keeps pace with industry 

development, enhances students’ practical abilities and professional literacy, and enables them to 

quickly adapt to industry job requirements after graduation. For example, the latest industry standards 

and technical specifications (such as bridge design specifications and construction safety standards) are 

introduced into the teaching of bridge engineering. 

 

2. Reform Philosophy 

Based on the constructivist learning theory and the CDIO engineering education model, a teaching 

framework of “three integrations” is constructed: 

Interdisciplinary Integration: By integrating the knowledge graphs of civil engineering, computer 

science, and industrial design, an interdisciplinary course system is built. In the bridge shape design 

module, the structural mechanics knowledge of civil engineering, the parametric modeling technology 

of computer science, and the aesthetic evaluation system of industrial design are integrated to form a 

progressive teaching design of “structural performance-digital modeling-shape optimization”. For 

instance, parametric modeling is incorporated into bridge shape design. 

Virtual-Real Scene Integration: A dual-track platform combining virtual and real scenes is adopted. 

Virtual scenes are used for scheme verification, and physical workshops are used to produce 1:10 scale 

models. 

Value-Ability Integration: The course assessment system not only focuses on technical abilities but 

also emphasizes professional literacy and engineering ethics. The craftsman spirit is evaluated through 

quantitative indicators such as model production accuracy and node craftsmanship; engineering ethics 

is integrated into the review of design schemes to examine students’ consideration of safety, 

sustainability, and social impact. In addition, soft indicators such as teamwork and innovative thinking 

are set up. Combined with evaluations from industry experts and public hearings, it is ensured that 

students not only master professional skills but also have a sense of social responsibility, realizing the 

all-round development of “technology + humanities”. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

46 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

3. Course System Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Progressive Teaching Model 

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of digital and intelligent technologies, the “Bridge 

Engineering” course urgently needs to break through the traditional teaching framework and build a 

teaching system that meets the needs of engineering talent cultivation in the new era. This course 

adopts a three-dimensional progressive teaching model of “Journey of Exploring Bridges-Secret of 

Investigating Bridges-Joy of Creating Bridges”. Combined with technologies such as virtual simulation, 

big data analysis, and intelligent interaction, it realizes multi-dimensional innovative reconstruction of 

course content and teaching methods. Through this model, the course will transform from “knowledge 

imparting” to “ability construction” and cultivate a new generation of bridge engineers with digital 

thinking and cross-boundary collaboration capabilities. 

3.1 Journey of Exploring Bridges-Cultural Origin Module 

In the “Journey of Exploring Bridges”, teachers and students enter the world of “bridges” together. 

This part mainly covers the overview of bridges, the history of bridge development, the basic 

composition and classification of bridges, etc. 

(1) Typical ethical conflict scenarios in bridge construction are set up. For example, the site selection of 

mountain bridges needs to balance ecological protection and economic development. Students conduct 

decision-making deduction through multi-role play (engineers, villagers, environmental protection 

organizations). 

(2) Measures such as warm-up videos of domestic and foreign bridges, small bridge demonstration 

experiments (with human participation in bridge construction), and bridge-related games are used to 

lead students into the “Journey of Exploring Bridges”. 

(3) Students can collect materials, give presentations titled “Let Me Talk About Bridges”, and complete 

the first assignment that is not related to mechanical analysis. 

3.2 Secret of Investigating Bridges-Technology Decoding Module 

Students are guided to study various types of bridges together. This part mainly covers the structure, 

force transmission characteristics, and design of various bridge types. In addition, special sections for 

famous bridge appreciation, bridge aesthetics, red bridges, bridge construction, and bridge accidents are 

established; resource libraries such as MIDAS CIVIL, micro-bridge experiments, bridge competition 

database, bridge standard drawing database, and bridge specification database are built to lead students 

to explore the secrets of bridges. 

3.3 Joy of Creating Bridges-Practical Innovation Module 

Students are encouraged to make bridges by themselves to enhance the practicality of the course. This 

teaching model not only cultivates students’ comprehensive abilities with both “hard technology” and 

“soft literacy” but also fosters an innovative ecosystem of “education feeding back the industry” in the 

integration of industry and education. It provides a replicable practical paradigm for the cultivation of 

bridge engineers in the era of intelligent construction. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

47 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

4. Three Major Reform Implementation Plans 

4.1 Strategy for Course Content Reorganization 

In this reform of the “Bridge Engineering” course, the course content is redesigned, and a modular 

knowledge system is built, including a basic module, five expansion module sections (famous bridge 

appreciation section, bridge aesthetics section, red bridge section, bridge construction section, bridge 

accident section), and a resource library module. 

(1) The original 8 chapters of teaching content in the basic module are reconstructed into four modules, 

namely, Overview of Bridges, Beam Bridge Structure, Beam Bridge Design, and Other Types of 

Bridges. The Overview of Bridges includes the basic composition and classification of bridges, 

planning and design procedures, and the functions of bridge structures. The Beam Bridge Structure 

covers slab bridges, beam bridges, bridge deck structures, supports, and piers. The Beam Bridge 

Design includes the design of main beams, bridge decks, and diaphragms. Other Types of Bridges 

include arch bridges, cable-stayed bridges, and suspension bridges. 

(2) The five expansion module sections include: Famous Bridge Appreciation Section, Bridge 

Aesthetics Section, Red Bridge Section, Bridge Construction Section, and Bridge Accident Section. 

(3) The resource library module includes: bridge software module, micro-bridge experiment database, 

bridge competition database, bridge standard drawing database, bridge specification database, and other 

resources. 

4.2 Practical Model of “Course Entering Workshop” 

By integrating the “Bridge Engineering” course into the workshop, project-based teaching is realized, 

and an intelligent workshop with “coexistence of virtual and real” is built. This closely combines 

theoretical knowledge with engineering practice, enhances students’ practical abilities and their ability 

to solve practical problems. For example, the teaching of the “Bridge Engineering” course is divided 

into two parts: classroom teaching and workshop teaching. In classroom teaching, students are guided 

to use MIDAS CIVIL, finite element analysis, and other tools for bridge analysis; in workshop teaching, 

students are required to complete the experimental design and construction tasks of a reinforced 

concrete micro-bridge analyzed in classroom teaching in groups, so as to cultivate their teamwork and 

communication skills. Students are required to complete the whole process from design to construction, 

which stimulates their innovative thinking and practical abilities. 

4.3 Construction of Wechat Official Account 

A dedicated WeChat official account for the “Bridge Engineering” course is established and applied to 

the interactive teaching of bridge engineering professional courses, so as to improve the shortcomings 

of traditional course teaching. 

The unique value of this official account is as follows: 

(1) Breaking the constraints of time and space: Students can obtain resources anytime and anywhere for 

fragmented learning. Through various interactive forms, students’ participation is enhanced, making 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

48 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

the official account an extension of the classroom. 

(2) Stimulating learning interest: Cases, interactions, and stories are used to reduce the dullness of 

professional knowledge. This official account records images and shares stories to make the learning 

process more vivid. For example, it posts on-site photos and short videos of students conducting 

“bridge load tests” and “model making”; selects excellent bridge models, calculation reports, and CAD 

drawings, and attaches teachers’ comments. 

(3) Connecting the classroom with the industry: It not only consolidates the theoretical foundation but 

also broadens the professional horizon. This official account is committed to providing cutting-edge, 

practical, and systematic knowledge content for bridge engineering students and enthusiasts, covering 

industry frontiers and technological innovations; it also provides past real exam questions, key points 

for the Registered Road Engineer examination, and guidelines for the National University Student 

Structural Design Competition. 

 

5. Evaluation Plan 

An evaluation method centered on the combination of diversification, process orientation, and 

timeliness is constructed. In the teaching evaluation reform of bridge engineering, this evaluation 

method, which combines diversification, process orientation, and timeliness, is taken as the core, 

aiming to comprehensively and scientifically evaluate students’ learning effects and ability 

development. 

5.1 Diversified Evaluation Method 

A variety of evaluation methods and indicators are adopted to comprehensively evaluate students’ 

mastery of knowledge, application of skills, and comprehensive quality, avoiding the limitations of a 

single test score. For example, multiple evaluation methods such as examinations, assignments, quizzes, 

group micro-bridge experiment project tasks, and PPT reports are used. 

5.2 Process-oriented Evaluation Method 

Emphasis is placed on the evaluation of the learning process. Through phased feedback and continuous 

improvement, students are helped to discover and solve problems in a timely manner, and their ability 

development is promoted. For example, real-time feedback on quiz scores and assignment evaluations 

is provided through the online learning platform. One-on-one tutoring or group discussions are used to 

help students solve problems in the learning process. 

5.3 Timely Evaluation Method 

Real-time or near-real-time evaluation methods are adopted to quickly feed back students’ learning 

effects and improve the timeliness and effectiveness of evaluation. For example, students receive their 

scores and explanations immediately after completing a quiz. A real-time question-and-answer system 

is used to collect students’ in-class feedback. The learning progress and knowledge mastery of students 

are analyzed through the data of the learning platform. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/grhe            Global Research in Higher Education                  Vol. 8, No. 3, 2025 

49 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

 

6. Conclusion 

By using the above reform plans and adopting the three-stage progressive teaching model of 

“Exploring Bridges-Investigating Bridges-Creating Bridges”, a trinity course system of 

“Culture-Technology-Innovation” is constructed. Ultimately, an engaging course centered on the core 

concept of “Discovering Your Beauty Through Bridges” is realized. 

 

Funding 

This paper sponsored by Teaching Research Project of Qingdao City University. Research on the 

Reform and Practice of the “Bridge Engineering” Course in the Digital and Intelligent Era. Project 

Number: 2025007B. 

 

References 

Liu, S. M., & Zhong, W. (2024). Exploration and Reform of the Teaching Model of the “Bridge 

Engineering” Course. Technology Wind, (25), 7-9. 

Wu, A. J., & Wu, Y. (2024). Discussion on the Teaching Reform of the “Bridge Engineering” Course 

Based on Knowledge Graphs—Taking Guizhou Institute of Technology as an Example. Education 

Observation, 13(30), 40-43. 

Yang, Y. H. (2024). Research on the Reform of “Smart” Courses and Talent Cultivation Under the 

Background of Digitalization. Henan Private Education Association. In Proceedings of the 2024 

Higher Education Development Forum (Volume 1, pp. 223-224). Chongqing Public 

Transportation Vocational College. 

Ye, Y. F. (2018). Reform and Practice of the “Bridge Engineering” Course Based on the CDIO 

Concept. Fujian Architecture and Construction, (12), 106-108. 

 

 


