












































Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  3 
 

INDIAN CHRISTIANITY: THROUGH HISTORICAL TRANSITIONARY MODES TO CONTEMPORARY 
POLYVALENT CHRISTIANITY 

 
Allan Varghese Meloottu 

(Asbury Theological Seminary) 
 
 
 

Abstract: This article explores the historical evolution and contemporary features of 
Indian Christianity, tracing its journey from the arrival of Apostle Thomas in A.D. 52 to 
its current status as a minority religion in a Hindu-majority nation. It examines key 
transitional modes, including assimilation with Syrian traditions, resistance against 
Portuguese Catholic impositions, vernacularization through Bible translations, and 
indigenization through revivals and social reforms.  The narrative highlights the interplay 
between foreign missionary influences and local adaptations, resulting in a uniquely 
Indian expression of Christianity.  Contemporary Indian Christianity has three distinctive 
features: its inter-religious nature shaped by theological permeability with other faiths, its 
holistic approach to mission addressing multidimensional poverty and social inequalities, 
and its resilience amid rising persecution from radical Hindutva movements.  The article 
also discusses the diverse denominational landscape, including Catholics, Orthodox, 
Protestants, Pentecostals, and independent churches, and their varied theological and 
missional priorities. Despite challenges, Indian Christianity remains a dynamic and 
polyvalent faith, embodying cultural integration, social transformation, and spiritual 
resilience.  This study underscores the enduring adaptability and relevance of Christianity 
in India, offering insights into its historical transitions and contemporary significance in a 
pluralistic and socio-politically complex context.  
 

 
INTRODUCTION 

 
Christianity’s early emergence in West Asia, its subsequent reach to South Asia with the arrival of Jesus’ 
disciple Thomas, and its spread to Central Asia in the form of Syriac Christianity, “Asia has the longest 
and perhaps the most complicated history with the Christian faith.”1 However, despite these long-standing 
relations with Christianity, today, “Asian Christians live as minorities among people of other faiths.”2 
Indian Christianity characterizes this minority status very well, as the Christians in the region continually 
make sense of their faith as they interact with the normative aspects of other major World religions 
(Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism) along with other socio-economic and political 
factors. This chapter, while providing a brief account of Indian Christian history, also calls attention to the 
distinctive theological features of Indian Christianity as it engages with significant contextual trends in 
the region. In the first part of this chapter, I briefly recount the various major transitory modes in the 
formation of Indian Christian history as it traversed from Christianity’s arrival in the first century, 
through a period of conquest, migration and resistance in the 1400s-1600s; then through accommodation, 
and vernacularization in the 1600s-1800s; and finally, through revivals and indigenization in the 1900s. 
Second, considering the diverse theologies of Indian Christianity, I highlight three distinctive 

 
1 Lalsangkima Pachuau, World Christianity: A Historical and Theological Introduction. (Nashville, Tennessee: 

Abingdon Press, 2018), 63. 
2 Sebastian Kim and Kirsteen Kim. Christianity As a World Religion: An Introduction. Second edition. (London; New 

York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016) 25. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  4 
 

characteristics of contemporary Indian Christianity: inter-religious nature, holistic and resilient amid 
religious persecution.   

 
TRANSITORY MODES IN THE HISTORY OF INDIAN CHRISTIANITY: 

 
ARRIVAL AND ASSIMILATION: 

 
The beginning of Indian Christianity can be traced back to the long-held tradition that Jesus’ disciple, 
Thomas, arrived and preached the Gospel, establishing churches. Although there have been speculations 
around the historical reliability of Thomas’ arrival, the tradition claims that the apostle arrived at the 
Malabar coast in A.D. 52.3 Furthermore, in light of the available evidence of maritime trade routes 
between West Asia and South India, as Robert Eric Frykenberg notes, it is “not implausible” to claim 
Thomas’ arrival and the subsequent establishment of a Christian community.4  

 After almost two hundred years, in 345, a merchant named Thomas Cana arrived from the 
Persian Empire with four hundred Christians and two Syrian bishops,5 reviving the pre-existing Thomas 
Christians. Consequently, the South Indian Thomas Christianity (including parts of today’s Kerala and 
Tamil Nadu) embodied Syrian theology, worship forms, and customs. Such a Syrian influenced 
Christianity, assimilated and localized into the south Indian social class-caste structures. Subsequently, 
from the fourth to the sixteenth century, the church and its doctrines (influenced by the Syriac rites) 
assimilated into the local contexts and have become, in Francis Thonippara’s words, “truly an Indian 
Church rooted in Indian soil.”6 Such an assimilated and localized Christianity remained unchallenged for 
centuries until the arrival of the Portuguese in the sixteenth century. 

 
CONQUEST, MIGRATION, AND RESISTANCE: 

 
During the Portuguese period, the story of Indian Christianity shifted due to conquest, transregional 
migration, and resistance. The pathway for these transitory modes began when the Portuguese merchant 
Vasco Da Gama arrived on the shores of Kozhikode (Calicut) on May 20, 1498, claiming that “we come 
to seek Christians and spices.”7 However, the Portuguese had long-term plans of conquest.  

The Portuguese declared parts of South India as the ‘State of India’ (Estado da India) in 1505, 
and appointed Alfonso de Albuquereque as the Portuguese ‘Governor of India’ in 1509, marking a new 
beginning in the Indian socio-politics and religious history. Alfonso de Albuquereque, “a genial colonizer 
and administrator,”8 transferred the Portuguese base from Kochi to Goa, as “the conditions in Goa were 
favourable for a conquest.”9 With five islands located ideally between the Muslim kingdoms of the north 

 
3 Susan Bayly, Saints, Goddesses and Kings: Muslims and Christians in South Indian Society, 1700-1900. (Cambridge: 

Cambridge University Press, 1989) 244.  
4 Robert Eric Frykenberg. “Christianity in South India Since 1500: Historical Studies of Transcultural Interactions 

Within Hindu-Muslim Environments.” Dharma Deepika 1, no. 2 (1997): 4. 
5 C. P. Mathew and M. M. Thomas, The Indian Churches of Saint Thomas. Revised Edition. (Delhi: ISPCK, 2005), 20.  
6 Francis Thonippara, “From Colonization to Romanization: The Impact of the Synod of Udayamperur on Saint 

Thomas Christian in Heritage of Early Christian Communities in India: Some Landmarks, edited by G. John Samuel (Chennai, 
India: Institute of Asian Studies, 2010) 111.  

7 Quoted in Robert Eric Frykenberg. Christianity in India: From Beginnings to the Present. (New York: Oxford 
University Press, 2010), 121.  

8 Leonard Fernando and George Gispert-Sauch. Christianity in India. (New Delhi: Penguin, 2004), 113. 
9 Fernando and Gispert-Sauch. Christianity in India, 114. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  5 
 

and the Hindu Vijayanagar kingdom of the south, Albuquerque allied with the Hindu feudal lords.10 
While the Portuguese were critical and intolerant towards the Muslims, they adopted a tolerant outlook 
toward the Hindus, hoping that they would convert to Catholicism.  

However, such a tolerant attitude soon started to fade. Starting in 1540, policies were instituted to 
indicate intolerance towards non-Christians. Forceful conversions, demolition of Hindu temples, and 
other intolerant actions ensued (especially in Goa) under the Portuguese conquest. The Portuguese 
policies were also detrimental to the local Christians as the Portuguese “sought to purify the native 
Christians from the influence of their former Hindu traditions and customs.”11 Consequently, religious 
persecution, poor living conditions, and the excessive land taxation prompted the native Christians to 
leave Goa in the 1540s-50s. Later on, the attacks from the Sultan of Bijapur (1570) and Shambaji, the 
Maratha king (1683) on Goa also prompted further migration among native Christians to Kanara.  

While these transregional developments occurred in Goa and Karnataka, a different story played 
out in Kerala: the story of resistance. The local Syrian bishops resisted any attempts to lure the Syrian 
Christians or to replace Syrian ceremonies with Latin. The unrest between the Syrians and the Catholics 
came to its pinnacle in 1597 with the death of the Syrian bishop Mar Abraham, and the Catholic 
Archbishop of Goa, Alexis de Menezes, saw to it that no new bishop should arrive in Malabar from 
Mesopotamia to replace the deceased bishop.12 Using this Syrian leadership vacuum, Menezes set his 
agenda “to purify all the Churches from heresy and errors.”13 In 1599, by convoking a Synod at 
Udayamperur (popularly known as the Synod of Diamper), which lasted for seven days, the Archbishop 
made steps to establish the Pope’s supremacy over the Syrian Christians, and instructed all Syrian clergy 
to institute the Latin rituals.  

However, a good section of the Syrian Thomas Christians under the leadership of Archdeacon 
Thomas resisted the Portuguese Latinization, leading to an insurgency by local Syrian Christians that 
resulted in the Coonen Cross Resolution against the Portuguese and the Roman church on January 3, 
1653.14 The Coonen Cross Resolution resulted in the division of the Syrian Christians, marking “the end 
of the unity of the Kerala Church.”15 “The ones who remained with the Roman Church came to be known 
as the ‘Pazhayakur’ (old party), and the ones who maintained their separation from the Roman Church 
came to be known as the ‘Puthenkur’ (new party),”16 re-integrating their ecclesial order with the Syrian 
Jacobite Church as they reintroduced oriental customs, and reinstated Syriac as the ecclesiastical 
language. 

While the colonially minded Portuguese administration ventured on conquering Goa with its 
militarized Christian policies (unscathed by the Jesuit protests against the colonial imposition of 

 
10 In light of the ongoing attempts to resist the Muslim encroachment into the south, the Hindu empire of Vijayanagara 

was also happy to establish bonds with the Christian Portuguese traders. For a brief history of the Vijayanagara empire, see 
(Pillalamarri 2015, https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/450-years-ago-this-battle-changed-the-course-of-indian-history/ accessed on 
December 2, 2021) 

11 Carmine D’Costa. “Migration of Christians from Goa and the Making of the Mangalorean Christian Community in 
South Kanara (1560-1763).” Indian Church History Review 44.1 (2010), 44. Some of the polices were: the 1540 rigor of mercy, 
the 1541 conformity of the holy faith, and the 1684 anti-Konkani legislation. 

12 Quoted in Allan Varghese, The Reformative and Indigenous Face of the Indian Pentecostal Movement. International 
Journal for Indian Studies, 4, no. 2 (2019). 3.  

13 Mathew, and Thomas, The Indian Churches of Saint Thomas, 32 
14 The local Syrian Christians gathered outside a church at Mattancherry in Cochin and took the oath on the crooked-

shaped stone cross. The word ‘coonen’ translates to ‘crooked.’ 
15 Sreedhara Menon, Kerala History and its Makers. (Kottayam, Kerala: DC Books, 2008), 122. 
16 Varghese, “The Reformative and Indigenous Face of the Indian Pentecostal Movement,” 4.  

https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/450-years-ago-this-battle-changed-the-course-of-indian-history/


Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  6 
 

Christianity), with the native Goan Christians migrating to neighboring kingdoms and the local Kerala 
Syrian Christians resisting the Catholic invasion, some missionaries ventured on to communicate the 
Gospel. Most notably, the life and work of Francis Xavier and Robert De Nobili are noteworthy for their 
missionary efforts of accommodating the local elements to Christian faith, contrasted with the Portuguese 
militarized Christianity. 

 
ACCOMMODATION AND VERNACULARIZATION:  

 
When Francis Xavier arrived among the Paravas in 1542, Xavier found Christians who had converted ten 
years ago due to a tactical alliance as the local caste group sought military protection from the Catholics 
against the Muslim merchants. Xavier’s two-year presence among the Paravas of Tamil Nadu (considered 
low caste) is one of the early missionary examples of attempting to truly inform the locals of the catholic 
beliefs and practices beyond mere colonial impositions. Although Xavier could only teach them “to make 
the sign of the cross and to recite garbled Tamil renderings of the Creed and the Ave Maria,” Xavier 
consolidated a new and distinctive Christian tradition among the Paravas.17  

However, after Xavier, an Italian Jesuit, Roberto de Nobili (1577-1656), took intentional steps to 
accommodate Indian cultural norms in communicating the Gospel. De Nobili lived in Madurai for almost 
40 years (1606- 1644) and is known for his lifestyle missionary witness among the prominent Tamil class. 
“If Francis Xavier has dealt with the lowest, most polluting segments of Tamil society down the Fisher 
Coast, Roberto de Nobili dealt exclusively with the highest and most pure.”18 De Nobili immersed 
himself in the South Indian Brahmic culture, embodied as a sannyasi, and “sought to remove the barriers 
that lay between the Hindus of caste and faith in Christ by stripping both the Christian message and the 
Christian messenger of their respective ‘cultural encoding’ and embracing the local cultural norms.19 In 
addition, de Nobili became well versed in the Tamil language, “developed a Tamil writing style far 
surpassing the minimal requirements of the colloquial; he learned Sanskrit, Hinduism’s classical 
language, and was probably the first European to be fluent in it.”20 De Nobili translated some parts of the 
Scripture and Catholic liturgies into Tamil vocabulary, which became valuable for the protestant 
missionaries who translated the Bible into local vernacular languages. De Nobili’s approach to mission 
was revolutionary to the extent that it brought a new understanding of Gospel accommodation and set the 
ground for vernacularization that resulted from translation. 

After de Nobili, Bible translation became a crucial transitional mode that led the future trajectory 
of Indian Christianity. On July 9, 1706, Bartholomew Ziegenbalg and Henry Pluetschau arrived at 
Tranquebar. Subsequently, numerous Lutheran missionaries joined the mission in Tranqubar (also known 
as Tarangambadi). For the Protestant missionaries, education and church building went hand in hand. 
Therefore, Ziegenbalg and other subsequent missionaries began translating the Bible into the vernacular 
languages as a vital step forward in their education mission. With his hope to present the Gospel to the 
natives, Ziegenbalg first completed and printed the Tamil New Testament between 1714 and 1715. 
Although Ziegenbalg’s version had to be revised multiple times until it was fit for local reading, as 

 
17 Bayly, Saints, Goddesses and Kings, 328. 
18 Robert Eric Frykenberg, “India” in Adrian Hastings, A World History of Christianity. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 

1999), 169. 
19 Cody C. Lorance, “Cultural Relevance and Doctrinal Soundness: The Mission of Roberto de Nobili.” Missiology 33, 

no.4 (2005), 417. 
20 Francis X. Clooney, “Roberto de Nobili, Adaptation and the Reasonable Interpretation of Religion.” Missiology 18, 

no. 1 (1990), 26. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  7 
 

Stephen Neil writes, Ziegenbalg’s achievement was considerable; for the first time, the entire New 
Testament had been made available in an Indian language.”21  

For the other missionaries who translated the Bible into other south Indian languages, 
Ziegenbalg’s work served as a foundation. Benjamin Schultze, another Lutheran missionary, was a 
successor to Ziegenbalg. Not only did he take the task of completing the Old Testament translation to 
Tamil in 1724 (which Ziegenbalg started), but he also became the first person to translate “the New 
Testament into Telugu in 1727 and the Old Testament by 1732.”22 While Lutheran Missionaries began 
translating the Bible into Tamil and Telugu, the English missionaries translated it into Kannada and 
Malayalam. As the Danish political influence waned with the ascendancy of the English East India 
Company, various British Christian missionary societies took on the task of translating the Bible into 
Indian languages.  

Western protestant missionary societies during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries 
pioneered numerous literary endeavors in North Indian states as they embarked on translating the Bible 
into local languages. Although Christianity had a minimal presence in North India until the eighteenth 
century, with the arrival of the British missionaries, notably the ‘Serampore Trio’—William Carey, 
Joshua Marshman, and William Ward, Christianity became a strong social influencer. The Trio translated 
the Bible into six languages— Sanskrit, Bengali, Hindi, Marathi, Odia, and Assamese.23  These 
translation efforts paved the Indian Christian’s trajectory towards vernacularization, social reform, and 
indigenization.  

For example, in Kerala, as Hepzibah Israel rightly points out, “this Christian population in 
general had no recourse to reading the Bible either in Syriac or Malayalam, [but] unlike other parts of 
India, the Bible was first translated into Malayalam not for non-Christians but for a largely Christian 
population.”24 Therefore, upon the availability of the Bible in the local Malayalam vernacular, the locally 
reform-minded clergy of Syrian churches(who also helped the missionaries in their translation efforts) 
broke away from the Syriac liturgy, beginning to celebrate rites in Malayalam.25 Eventually, this led the 
reform-minded Syrian Christians to establish themselves as the Mar Thoma Church, leading the way to 
forming the Mar Thoma Evangelistic Association in 1888. As the Bible became readily available in local 
languages, the wave of reformations and revivals emerged, leaving a “strong foundation of an indigenous 
Church in India.”26 During the European translation efforts, the native “helpers” and leaders who played a 
pivotal role in helping the European translation efforts also led the charge in reforming the existing 
Christian communities towards vernacularization.  

In speaking of vernacularization, it is also important to highlight that the accessibility of the 
vernacular Bible and education has empowered the Dalits and women. 27 The Dalits were “forbidden to 
read and hear the sacred scriptures of the Hindus. Thus, they were cut off from all forms of literacy, 

 
21 Stephen C. Neill, A History of Christianity in India: 1707-1858. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 34. 
22 Hephzibah Israel, “Protestant Translations of the Bible in Indian Languages.” Religion Compass vol. 4, no. 2, (2010), 

95. 
23 For more details, see Vishal and Ruth Mangalwadi, The Legacy of William Carey: A Model for 

Transformation of a Culture (Crossway Books: 1999).  
24 Israel, “Protestant Translations of the Bible in Indian Languages,” 94. 
25 Fernando and Gispert-Sauch. Christianity in India, 176. 
26 Daniel Jeyaraj, “Early Tamil Bible Translation in Tranquebar.” Dharma Deepika vol. 1, no. 1(1997), 75. 
27 For example, see Chakali Chandra Sekhar, “Dalit Women and Colonial Christianity: First Telugu Bible Women as 

Teachers of Wisdom.” Economic & Political Weekly vol. 56, no. 11(2021), 57-63. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  8 
 

especially from Hindu sacred texts.”28 Such is the context in which the Protestant missionaries gave the 
Dalits access to study at the mission schools and listen to the Biblical teachings. Thus, the “accessibility 
of the Christian sacred Scriptures was an opportunity for empowerment.”29  

While the vernacularization of the Scripture brought the liberationist perspective to Dalits and 
women in regions of India, the Western Christian missionary advocacy also brought forth certain social 
reform in India. For example, the Serampore missionaries—William Carey, William Ward, and Joshua 
Marshman—were strong advocates against Sati—the widow-burning practice—prevalent across the State 
of Bengal in India. In his letter to Dr. Ryland, William Carey writes on his experience of April 1, 1799, 
saying, “as I was returning from Calcutta I saw …a woman burning herself with the corpse of her 
husband, for the first time in my life.”30 This exposure moved Carey to study and propose the abolition of 
Sati to the Governor Lord Wellesley. Carey’s proposal involved two aspects: a) a statistical account of all 
the deaths (through Sati) that happened within a 30-mile radius around Calcutta, and b)a religious account 
of all the Hindu texts that report that Sati is not a Sacred duty enjoined with Hinduism. Eventually, the 
partnership of the Serampore Trio with the Indian Hindu reformers led Lord William Bentick to abolish 
Sati in 1829.  

 
REVIVAL AND INDIGENIZATION: 

 
The availability of the Bible in their language provided a sense of authority and autonomy to the local 
reform-minded Indian leaders to lead reforms in their existing churches and to reach out to non-
Christians. Additionally, with the rise of an anti-Western, nationalist socio-political context, Indian 
Christianity entered an era of revival of indigenization. Such a local reformative and revival impetus 
paved the way for Pentecostalism in India as part of the “Indian-initiated” indigenization process, shaking 
off the captivity of Western missionary Christianity.31  

One of the earliest revivals in South India was the Christianpettah Revival, led by John Christian 
Aroolappen, a trained Anglican catechist. In his diary for August 8, 1860, Aroolappen recorded: “In the 
month of June some of our people praised the Lord by unknown tongues, with their interpretations.... My 
son and a daughter and three others went to visit their own relations, in three villages, who are under the 
Church Missionary Society, they also received the Holy Ghost. Some prophesy, some speak by unknown 
tongues with their interpretations.”32 Aroolappen began to preach beyond the CMS churches following 
the apostolic pattern of traveling evangelists and embraced an indigenous attitude when limiting the 
western missionary influence on the revival by accepting little or no western funding. 

Aroolappen’s revival became influential in reforming Christianity, leading to more reform-
minded churches, from the Mar Thoma church to the Brethren and Pentecostal churches. Consequently, in 
1926, the first indigenous Pentecostal denomination was formed as “South Indian Pentecostal Church of 
God (SIPC)” under the leadership of K.E. Abraham,33 insisting on indigenous leadership. This instance 
prompted SIPC to send missionaries to various parts of India, eventually removing the ‘South’ from the 
title and reframing themselves as the ‘Indian Pentecostal Church of God’ (IPC).  

 
28 Sathianathan Clarke, “Viewing the Bible through the Eyes and Ears of Subalterns in India.” Biblical 

Interpretation vol. 10, no. 3(2002), 256. 
29 Sathianathan. “Viewing the Bible through the Eyes and Ears of Subalterns in India,” 256. 
30 Quoted in George Smith, The Life of William Carey (London: J. M. Dent & Sons), 1909,78, 79. 
31 Paul Joshua, Christianity Remade: The Rise of Indian-initiated Churches. (Texas: Baylor University Press, 2022).  
32 Aroolappen quoted in McGee 1996,113. 
33 Varghese, “The Reformative and Indigenous Face of the Indian Pentecostal Movement,” 11. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  9 
 

 
In the north Indian setting, the Sialkot revival of 1904, the Dholka revival of 1905, the revival of 

1905 in Khasi Hills, and the Mukti revival of 1905 became pivotal in establishing Pentecostalism. 
Noteably, it is essential to attribute the influence of Pandita Ramabai’s leadership, who held the balance 
of social reformation, religious revivalist faith, and an anti-western attitude. Being a Hindu widow, a 
mother of a girl child, and a woman with reformative ambitions, Ramabai firmly believed that women’s 
leadership is imperative for the fight against inequalities propagated by the Hindu caste system. Although 
Ramabai stood against some of the missionaries in India who embodied a colonial attitude, Christianity 
gave her an ideological imagination for social reforms. In 1889, Ramabai started Sharada Sadan (Home of 
learning) in Bombay, and “was the first ever residential school for high caste Hindu widows and 
unmarried girls in Maharashtra.”34 Later, Ramabai established the ‘Mukti Mission’ (Home of Salvation) 
and a rescue home named ‘Kripa Sadan’ (Home of Mercy), which carried a more Christian expression. 
While Ramabai continued to be a strong advocate for women, her openness to revive Indian Christianity 
began in “the Revival of 1905” at the Mukti Mission, one of the early expressions of Indian 
Pentecostalism.35 During this revival, which lasted for the following years, Ramabai writes, “most of the 
workers, and many of the girls and boys have received greater blessings. The fruit of the blessing began to 
manifest itself in deepening spiritual life, continuance in earnest prayer, greater zeal in winning souls for 
Christ, increasing love, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost.”36 The Revival of 1905 is a pivotal historical 
gathering, from which girls and women went to other parts of North India to establish churches and social 
reform efforts. Numerous contemporary Pentecostal and charismatics in various north Indian states see 
the current growth as an aftermath of early twentieth-century revivals.  

Simultaneously, in other parts of India, the anti-Western political sentiment also led numerous 
revival-minded local leaders to the path of indigenization in their respective denominations to be more 
Indian-initiated in their approach. Even though the vision for a unified church in South India was forming 
from the early 1900s, it took till 1947 (immediately after India gained political independence from 
Britain) for the main protestant denominations to officially inaugurate the new church as the Church of 
South India (CSI). Although the political independence of India was not a direct reason for such a unified 
church, the increasing sense of nationalism in the country did influence it.37 especially in ensuring that 
churches be “authentically Indian church in matters of finance and personnel.”38 In 1970, the churches in 
north India also followed the trend in establishing the Church of North India (CNI). 

The transitional modes of revival and indigenization also led to the establishment of various 
Christian Ashrams, in an attempt to imagine a Hindu way of Christianity, for example, in North India, 
notably the Sat Tal Christian Ashram (established in 1930), in South India, the Shantivanam in Tamil 
Nadu (established in 1950) and Kurisumala Ashram in Kerala (established in 1958). The primary aim of 
these ashrams is to “establish a way of contemplative life, based alike on the traditions of Christian 

 
34 Meera Kosambi, “Indian Response to Christianity, Church and Colonialism: Case of Pandita Ramabai,” Economic 

and Political Weekly, 27, No.43/44, (1992), 63.  
35 For a general introductory discussion on the Mukti revival, see Allan H. Anderson, “Pandita Ramabai, the Mukti 

Revival and Global Pentecostalism.” Transformation, vol 23, no. 1 (2006), 37–48. 
36 Quoted in Adhav, S. M. Pandita Ramabai. (Madras: The Christian Literature Society, 1979), 217-218. 
37 Joshva Raj, “United and Uniting Churches,” in Christianity in South and Central Asia, edited by Kenneth R. Ross, 

Daniel Jeyaraj, and Todd M. Johnson. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019), 239. 
38 George Oommen, “Challenging Identity and Crossing Borders: Unity in the Church of South India.” Word & World, 

vol. 25, no. 1(2005), 62. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  10 
 

monasticism and of Hindu Sannyas.”39 From an educational perspective, the National Biblical 
Catechetical and Liturgical Center in Bangalore (founded in 1967) sought to “promote the renewal of the 
Church in an Indian context.”40 Such contextual efforts have also led to the notion of “Churchless 
Christianity”41 where groups such as Jesu Bhakta (devotees of Jesus), Yeshu Satsang (Jesus truth-
gatherings), and Yeshu Darbar (the royal court of Jesus) have reimagined the indigenous way to be 
Christians while believing in the Lordship of Jesus Christ, but belonging to their Hindu cultural customs.  

 
STATISTICAL OVERVIEW 

 
Collectively, the Christian population in India currently is the “largest Christian population in the [South 
Asian] region, [with] more than 60 million.”42 Additionally, as Gina A. Zurlo notes, “the country is home 
to historic Orthodox and Catholic churches as well as tens of millions of Protestants and Independents.”43 
The Orthodox constitute about 0.4 percent (4,975,000), with Catholics at 1.5 percent (19,882,000), 
Protestants at 1.6 percent (21,478,000), Evangelicals at .8 percent (10,027.000), the Pentecostals at 1.6 
percent (20,485,000), and the independents at 1.5 percent (18,990,000).44 While Catholic denominations 
include Latin, Syro-Malabar, and Syro-Malankara churches, Orthodox include Malankara Jacobite Syrian 
Orthodox Church (MJSOC), Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church (MOSC), and the Malabar Independent 
Church (Thozhiyur Church). On one end, the Protestant classification includes the western-originated 
branches such as Lutheran, Anglican, Methodist, and Presbyterians (which constitute ‘mainline’ 
protestants); on the other end, such a categorization can also include indigenous protestant churches such 
as the Mar Thoma church and the Church of South India (CSI). There is also a growing presence of 
evangelicals of Reformed and Baptist traditions. Finally, while Pentecostal denominations involve The 
Pentecostal Mission (TPM), Indian Pentecostal Church of God (IPC), Assemblies of God (AG), Church 
of God, Sharon Bible Fellowship, and New Life Church of God, there has been a rise of a plethora of 
independent churches that individual charismatic leaders have founded. Most recently, the Calvary 
Temple in Andhra Pradesh, founded by Satish Kumar, claims to have “close to 200,000 members who 
worship in four services.”45 

Geographically, the South and Northeastern states of India comprise a significant minority 
Christian population compared to the Northern states. State-wise, according to the Government of India, 
the 2011 census,46 Kerala tops the list of south Indian states with 6.2 million Christians constituting 18.38 

 
39 Sagaraj, Antonysamy. 2013. “Christianity in India: A Focus on Inculturation,” Research Papers of the 

Anthropological Institute Vol. 1, 129. accessed online on December 1, 2021. https://rci.nanzan-
u.ac.jp/jinruiken/publication/item/ronshu1-06%20Sagayaraj.pdf 

40 For more details on the National Biblical Catechetical and Liturgical Center, see the link: 
http://www.nbclcindia.org/history.html. Accessed on December 4, 2021.  

41 Herbert E. Hoefer, Churchless Christianity. (California: W. Carey Library, 2001). 
42 Gina A. Zurlo, “A Demographic Profile of Christianity in South and Central Asia,” in Christianity in South and 

Central Asia, edited by Kenneth R. Ross, Daniel Jeyaraj, and Todd M. Johnson (Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishing, 2019), 
12.  

43 Zurlo, “A Demographic Profile of Christianity in South and Central Asia, “12. 
44 Todd M. Johnson and Gina A. Zurlo quoted in Leonard Fernando, “North India” in Christianity in South and Central 

Asia, edited by Kenneth R. Ross, Daniel Jeyaraj, and Todd M. Johnson (Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishing, 2019), 120. 
45 James, Jonathan D. “Global, ‘Glocal’ and Local Dynamics in Calvary Temple: India’s Fastest Growing 

Megachurch”. In Handbook of Megachurches, edited by Stephen Hunt (Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2020), 303. 
46 “Christian Religion Census 2011,” Census of India 2011. https://www.census2011.co.in/data/religion/3-

christianity.html. Last accessed, November 24, 2023.COVID-19 and other geopolitical aspects resulted in the delay of conducting 
the 2021 Census. It will take place in 2023, and the results will be published the following year. 

http://www.nbclcindia.org/history.html
https://www.census2011.co.in/data/religion/3-christianity.html
https://www.census2011.co.in/data/religion/3-christianity.html


Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  11 
 

percent of the State population. Tamil Nadu follows with 4.4 million (6.12 percent), Karnataka with 1.1 
million (1.87 percent), and Andhra Pradesh with 1.1 million47 (1.34 percent) and Goa with 366 thousand 
(25.10 percent). In Northeast India, although the Christian population is not majority in the region, 
Christianity is the largest religion in five states, namely Arunachal Pradesh with 418,732 (30.26 percent), 
Manipur with 1.1 million (41.29 percent), Meghalaya with 2.2 million (74.59 percent), Mizoram with 
956,331 (87.16 percent), and Nagaland with 1.7 million (87.93 percent). In North India, Jharkhand with 
1.4 million (4.30 percent) leads in state-wise percentage of Christians, with Chhattisgarh with 490,542 
(1.92 percent) and Punjab with 348,230 (1.26 percent) immediately following. 

 
KEY FEATURES OF CONTEMPORARY INDIAN CHRISTIANITY 

 
Although one can imagine numerous features of contemporary Indian Christianity, I narrow the 
discussion in this section to three features roughly following Pachuau’s paradigm of three “common 
macro-contextual issues faced in the Majority World”: Religiosity, poverty & inequality, and Tensional 
existence.48 First, as already introduced, the religious plurality of the region produces the distinctive inter-
religious nature of Indian Christianity. Second, the Indian context of multidimensional poverty and 
inequality provides the holistic approach to the practice of Christian faith, and third, as Christianity 
remains a minority religion in India, the Christian faith is also characterized by a tensional existence 
leading to persecution (or the fear of persecution) from majoritarian radical groups.  

 
INTER-RELIGIOUS NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER RELIGIONS: 

 
Because Christianity is a minority religious group in India, Inter-religiosity has been a trademark of 
Indian Christianity. Christianity in the region is diverse in its local cultural expressions (along with the 
denominational diversities), making the theologies of inter-religiosity diverse. These theologies raise the 
question of how permeable the boundary of particular theologies is in relation to local religions. 
Theologian Swarup Bar integrates permeability with ecclesiology: “Permeability refers to the 
phenomenon of the passage of things through porous borders or boundaries.” Bar continues, “It would 
mean that it ought to have borders or boundaries, but those are porous, allowing selective passage of, say, 
perspectives and people.”49 Various denominations and theologians in the region hold a diverse spectrum 
of theology of religion that allows varying levels of permeability between Christianity and other religions; 
the church and other religious communities  

On one end, theologians like Stanley J. Samartha and S. Wesley Ariarajah50 adopt a more 
inclusive, pluralistic perspective towards other religions and propose a softer boundary between Christ, 
the church, and the outsider. On the other end, scholars like Lesslie Newbigin51 and Vinod 

 
47 This statistic involves Christians from the state of Telangana, as the state of formation did not occur during the 2011 

census. The state was officially formed on June 2, 2014, constituting the northwestern part of Andhra Pradesh with Hyderabad as 
its capital. 

48 Pachuau, World Christianity, 111.  
49 Swarup Bar, The Spirit Shaped Church: A Spirit Ecclesiology in India. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press, 

2021), 49 
50 S. Wesley. Ariarajah, Strangers or Co-pilgrims?: The Impact of Interfaith Dialogue On Christian Faith and 

Practice. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2017). 
51 Lesslie Newbigin, The Open Secret: An Introduction to the Theology of Mission. Revised edition. (Grand Rapids, 

Michigan: W.B. Eerdmans, 1995) 160-189. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  12 
 

Ramachandra52 attempt to provide a more exclusive yet inclusive approach, upholding the uniqueness of 
Christ and the church. Although the boundary between Christianity and other religions is clear, there is 
enough porosity in the relational attitude toward the religious other. However, scholars like M. M Thomas 
still attempt to permeabilize Christianity with the other by imagining three levels of “koinonia-in-Christ.” 
First, the koinonia of the eucharistic community of the church, where people acknowledge the Lordship 
of Jesus Christ, and second, a larger koinonia, where people from different faiths who are “inwardly being 
renewed by their acknowledgment of the ultimacy of the pattern of suffering servanthood as exemplified 
by the crucified Jesus.” Third, a still larger koinonia of those involved people who are “in the power-
political struggles for new societies.”53 Through the levels of ‘koinonia-in-Christ,’ Thomas attempts to 
soften the borders of Christianity, the church, and other religions.  

These varied theologies of religion have influenced how different denominations and Christians 
have emphasized different priorities in their missional engagements. On one end, there have been calls 
from mainline traditions “to move away from a mission that targets other religious communities for 
conversion,”54 and instead to collaborate with other religious adherents “in promoting the life-centered 
values of the reign of God.”55 However, on the other end, conversions have been a reality with the 
emergence of the Pentecostal movement and its emphasis on the Holy Spirit’s power over other spirits.56 
One could add that the evangelical and Pentecostal Christians uphold an exclusivist position of the 
uniqueness of Christ that results in the hard bordering of the church’s relation with the non-Christian 
religions. Pentecostals have not shied away from teaching a total rupture from the old religious traditions, 
making it clear that there is a hard border between Christianity and other religions. Yet, there is also the 
growing presence of “Churchless Christianity,”57 constituted of Hindu followers of Christ who attempt to 
soften the borders of Christianity with other religio-cultural traditions, with the belief that “when a person 
from Hinduism turns to Christ, he may do so without giving up socio-religious ties.”58  

However, missiologically, irrespective of where one lands on the spectrum of permeability (with 
a soft or harder border), the unavoidable challenge of Indian Christianity is presented in how one 
communicates the Christian Gospel to other religious adherents. Lesslie Newbigin’s experience in Tamil 
Nadu serves as an example of how the daily missiological engagements with other religious adherents not 
only force the missionary to be creative in theological translation but also add to the unique feature of 
Christianity. In the mission context of South India, Newbigin writes: 

 
I have heard speakers use many different Tamil words to explain who he (Jesus) 
is. He is Swamy (Lord). Alternatively, he is Satguru (the true teacher). He is 
Avatar (incarnation of God). Or, he is Kadavul (the transcendent God) who 

 
52 Vinoth Ramachandra, The Recovery of Mission: Beyond the Pluralist Paradigm. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. 

Eerdmans, 1997). 
53 M. M. Thomas, “A Christ-centered humanist approach to other religions in the Indian pluralistic context,” in Gavin 

D’Costa (ed). Christian uniqueness reconsidered: The myth of a pluralistic theology of religions. (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 
1990), 61. 

54 Ariarajah, Strangers or Co-pilgrims?, 124 
55 Ariarajah, Strangers or Co-pilgrims?, 125 
56 Sarbeswar Sahoo, Pentecostalism and Politics of Conversion in India. (New Delhi, India: Cambridge University 

Press, 2018). 
57 Hoefer, Churchless Christianity.  
58 Natun Bhattacharya, “Exploring Hindu ‘Insider Movements’: Syncretism or Authentic Contextualization? A 

Theological and Missiological Appraisal with a Fresh Approach” in Allen L. Yeh and Tite Tienou. Majority World Theologies: 
Theologizing From Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Ends of the Earth. (Littleton: William Carey Publishing, 2018) 97. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  13 
 

became man. All these words have in common that they place Jesus within a 
world of ideas formed by the Hindu tradition and embodied in the people’s 
languages.59 
 

As Newbigin rightly points out through this example, “one cannot begin to answer the question ‘who is 
Jesus?’ without using a language—and therefore a structure of thought—shaped by the pre-Christian 
experience of the one who asks the question. There is no way of avoiding this necessity.”60 At the same 
time, Newbigin notes, “the introduction of the name of Jesus places the structure under a strain that it 
cannot bear without breaking.”61  The theological translation of Christian themes through the existing 
religious idioms breaks free of the existing religious mold, giving a unique Christian imagination. In other 
words, the Christian theology, when translated (both linguistically and theologically) to the local settings, 
maintains a particular element of continuity and discontinuity with the existing religious idioms and 
ideologies. From its inception till now, Christianity in India continues such theological negotiation on 
individual and denominational levels with other religions around them, irrespective of one’s soft or hard-
bounded theology of religion.  

 
HOLISTIC CHRISTIANITY IN THE CONTEXT OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY AND SOCIAL INEQUALITIES:  

 
Multidimensional poverty is measured based on household surveys’ comprehensive health, education, and 
living deprivation data. Although considerable progress has been made in reducing multidimensional 
poverty (from 2015 to 2021), there is still work to be done, as India ranks 131 with 27.9% of the 
population in multidimensional poverty. 62 

Within this context of multidimensional poverty, Indian Christianity attempts to embody a 
theology of holism, communicating the “transformative power of the gospel over every aspect of life.”63 
Even among the Indian evangelicals and protestants heavily influenced by their American counterparts, 
there is a common consensus that, as Aminta Arrington notes, “that neither evangelism nor social action 
can stand on its own; they are integrally related in mission.”64 Although the delivery of such a 
holistic/integral Gospel appears differently based on the resources presented to the local congregation, 
there is a consensus across denominational boundaries as to the need for integral mission (evangelism and 
social action). Nonetheless, in some circles of Indian Christianity, such an emphasis on holism does not 
negate the existence of the evangelical tendency to “prioritize the ‘spiritual’ ministry of the church over 
social engagement.”65 Therefore, the debate continues regarding the importance of an integral mission. 

 
59 Newbigin, The Open Secret, 20. 
60 Newbigin, The Open Secret, 20. 
61 Newbigin, The Open Secret, 20  
62 For details of the Multidimensional report in India, see https://www.undp.org/india/publications/national-

multidimensional-poverty-index-progress-review-2023 (Last accessed on November 24, 2023). 
63 Aminta Arrington, “American Evangelicalism, Social Action, and Christianity in India” in Rebecca Shah and Joel A. 

Carpenter. Christianity in India: Conversion, Community Development, and Religious Freedom. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 
Press, 2018) 119. 

64 Arrington, “American Evangelicalism, Social Action, and Christianity in India”,118. 
65 Darren Duerksen, “What God Has Joined Together Let No One Separate: Local Church and Development Agencies 

in God’s Mission” in Rebecca Shah and Joel A. Carpenter. Christianity in India: Conversion, Community Development, and 
Religious Freedom. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press, 2018) 130. 

https://www.undp.org/india/publications/national-multidimensional-poverty-index-progress-review-2023
https://www.undp.org/india/publications/national-multidimensional-poverty-index-progress-review-2023


Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  14 
 

However, considering the context of Indian multidimensional poverty, Christians have partnered 
with other Christian Developmental Organizations (CDOs) or have formed various local organizations to 
alleviate poverty and develop social sectors. Roger Hedlund lists Indian organizations such as The 
Inheritors in Nagpur, Maharashtra Village Ministries, Emmanuel Ministries, Kolkata, Gospel Echoing 
Missionary Society (GEMS), and Din Bandhu (Friend of the Poor) that focus on holistic mission as 
examples of “creative ministries of new Christian movements” in India.66 In most instances, these 
developmental organizations and ministries work closely with local churches to bring change to people. 
The theological vision that unites the partnering work of local development organizations with local 
churches has been that of being “co-agents of missional transformation.”67 Although at times the 
relationship may not have been smooth, Duerksen equates notes the partnership to be “uneasy but divine 
marriage” where the close collaboration between the two creates some adaptive challenges,68 yet when 
churches partner with CDOs; “when churches allow the development ideas and concerns brought by a 
CDO to permeate, mix and help shape their sense of mission; when the CDO values and honors the 
church’s primacy as mission agent in that place…it is probable that the calling of the Christian 
development organization will contribute to God’s mission in ways not otherwise possible.”69 Such is the 
social and missiological shaping of contemporary Indian Christianity that looks to provide a holistic 
transformation in individuals and communities in the context of multidimensional poverty.  

Theologically, the context of poverty, along with various inequalities, namely the prevalence of 
systemic inequality against the lower castes (due to the existing social imaginary of caste consciousness), 
has also generated various contextual theologies. In this line of thinking, the Latin American Liberation 
Theology finds its place among Indian Christianity, predominantly in the Indian mainline denominations 
in the form of Dalit theology. The objective of Dalit theology was to communicate two complementary 
tasks. They are, as Sathianthan Clarke notes, “the resistance of Dalits to counter the reach of dominant 
theologies, and creative construction to circulate themes of Dalits’ experience of the Divine One.”70 The 
resistance of inter-religious theologies that solely used Brahminical texts, along with the resonance of 
Dalit lived experiences in the suffering Christ, provided a framework for the liberation of Dalits. Hence, 
Dalit theology came to be known as “a contextual rendition of Indian liberation theology.”71 While such 
theologizing continues to exist in certain quarters of Indian Christianity, without an overt liberation 
theology, the Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal movement also began to get traction among Dalits, 
especially among slum dwellers in urban cities72 and in the tribal areas of Northern India.73 Unlike 
liberation theology, which sidestepped the spiritual side in its purist form of socio-political challenge, in 
Pentecostalism, Dalits found holistic hope, which promises spiritual and socio-economic liberation. In 
other words, through the Pentecostal emphasis on the manifestation and intervention of the Holy Spirit, 

 
66 Roger E. Hedlund, Christianity Made in India: From Apostle Thomas to Mother Teresa. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: 

Fortress Press, 2017) 145–162. 
67 Duerksen, “What God Has Joined Together Let No One Separate,” 146. 
68 Duerksen, “What God Has Joined Together Let No One Separate,” 146. 
69 Duerksen, “What God Has Joined Together Let No One Separate,” 147. 
70 Sathianathan Clarke, “Dalit Theology.” in Virginia Fabella and R. S. Sugirtharajah (Eds), The SCM dictionary of 

third world theologies” (London: SCM Press, 2003) 64. 
71 Clarke, “Dalit Theology,” 64. 
72 Rebecca Samuel Shah, and Timothy Samuel Shah, “Pentecost Amid Pujas: Charismatic Christianity and Dalit 

women in Twenty-First-Century India” in Global Pentecostalism in the 21st century. Edited by Robert W. Hefner, (Bloomington: 
Indiana University Press, 2013) 194-222. 

73 Sahoo, Pentecostalism and Politics of Conversion in India. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  15 
 

the Dalits who are poor can receive, as Simon Chan notes, “spiritual liberation from fear and fatalism 
created by centuries of internalizing the law of karma; freedom from the fear of spirits; deliverance from 
demonic oppression, real or perceived; healing from their sickness, and so on.”74 In its theological 
emphasis on the Holy Spirit, Pentecostalism provides a much-needed avenue for the Dalits and people 
experiencing poverty to first experience spiritual liberation, which is imperative for any socio-political 
liberation.  

At the same time, in certain quarters of Indian Christianity, Pentecostalism has also fallen prey to 
propagating the wider structural caste-based biases into their churches, which has led some to form 
exclusively Dalit Pentecostal churches.75 Such Pentecostal structural mannerisms also stand under the 
critique of Dalit theological resistance in countering teachings and practices that propagate structural 
hierarchies.   

 
RESILIENT CHRISTIANITY IN THE CONTEXT OF PERSECUTION:  

 
The religiously plural setting of India, where the nation’s cultural and social aspects are closely knitted 
with religion, “religious change or conversion from one religion to another has been a contentious 
issue.”76 As Christians are a minority, any mission activities and preaching that invite other religious 
adherents to become new Christians are offensive and, in some cases, are punishable under the law.  

Although the Indian constitution does not provide preference to Hinduism as the state religion, 
the radical Hindutva movements have been on the rise, especially during the rule of the Bharatiya Janata 
Party (BJP) at the central government. The standard charge against the Christians and Muslims is that 
“these minority religious traditions are foreign and alien to the Majority Hindu culture of India.”77 While 
the government of India continues to publicly state that it upholds constitutional secularism and the right 
for all religious adherents to practice their religion fearlessly, Hindu radical groups such as the Vishwa 
Hindu Parishad (VHP), Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Sang Parivar, and Bajrang Dal continue to 
grow and instigate violence against Christians and Muslims in the grassroots. At the same time, under the 
disguise of upholding the right of the low caste people to practice their religion without falling to the 
material allure of Christian missionaries, various Indian states have instituted the ‘freedom of religion 
bill.’ This relatively new law, which is also popularly known as the ‘anti-conversion bill,’ was 
intentionally tailored to curb anyone from converting to Christianity or Islam. In addition, the Christian 
Community Developmental Organizations (CDO) are also finding it hard to implement developmental 
projects due to the accusation of conversion. Compassion International is one of the examples, as they 
were forced to leave the country in 2017 after 48 years of its operation on charges that the Child 
sponsorship funds are being used towards conversion.78   

 
74 Simon Chan, Grassroots Asian Theology: Thinking the Faith From the Ground Up. (Illinois: IVP Academic, 2014), 

103. 
75 V. V. Thomas, Dalit Pentecostalism: Spirituality of the Empowered Poor. (Bangalore: Asian Trading Corporation, 

2008).  
76 Pachuau, World Christianity, 86. 
77 Peter C. Phan and Jonathan Y. Tan. “Interreligious Majority-Minority Dynamics” in David Cheetham, Douglas Pratt, 

and David Thomas (eds). Understanding Interreligious Relations. (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2013), 222. 
78 “Christian charity set to withdraw from India after funding blocked,” The Guardian, 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/03/christian-charity-set-to-withdraw-from-india-after-funding-blocked, accessed 
on November 24, 2023.  

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/03/christian-charity-set-to-withdraw-from-india-after-funding-blocked


Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  16 
 

In response to these threats of persecution, Christians in India have been resilient and have 
attempted to uphold their minority religious rights according to the country’s constitutional liberties. 
Although the stringent religious freedom laws limit visible Christian engagements in some Indian states, 
the discussion around democracy and the constitutional rights of religious minorities comes to the 
forefront when attacks against Christians occur. Often in India, violence against minority religious 
adherents reinforces the need to find new ways to nurture a substantive democracy that enables religious 
freedom (for both the majority and minority). In advocating for religious freedom, Indian Christians are 
not only promoting the freedom to practice religion, but also to relate with other religions and their 
comprehensive doctrines.”79  

Theologically, persecutions also lead to reflecting upon how Christians should position 
themselves in instances of future attacks. On one end, in their struggle against the culture of violence, 
Christians should, as S. Wesley Ariarajah notes, look “beyond all religious boundaries” to embrace 
teachings and practical guidelines from other religious traditions and collaborate with others who are 
committed to overcoming the culture of violence through peace and nonviolence.80 However, on the other 
end, Indian Christians in some sense are expected to face more persecution, reminding themselves that 
“both conflict and suffering have always accompanied faith gospel witness.”81  

Ecumenically, the rise of religious persecution has also led to some contestation within Indian 
Christianity. Often, the protestants and Catholics have blamed the Pentecostals (who embrace persecution 
as part of Gospel witness) for their missionary approach of demonizing other religious beliefs and being 
“more assertive, more critical, and more visible in their evangelism” as an unnecessary provocation that is 
inviting persecution from other religious adherents.82 Elizabeth Koepping observes this phenomenon, 
especially among “certain Pentecostal-Charismatic Churches” who, as Koepping notes, “tend to promote 
the view that only Jesus saves in a very strident, even aggressive, manner. Moreover, they not only preach 
that no other religion is efficacious, but that all other religions are of the devil… Needless to say, loud 
antagonistic attitudes worsen the often already difficult life of long-established Christians.”83 

Despite these diversities of approach in the context of persecution, Indian Christianity strives 
through the challenges. Through forming new collaborations with other religious communities or 
fearlessly engaging in missional activities, the resilient nature of Indian Christianity permeates in their 
fearless outlook amid persecution.   

 
CONCLUSION 

 
The story of Indian Christianity is a testament to a faith that has been transitioning for the last two 
thousand years, as it has encountered multiple Christian traditions over two thousand years through 
various transcontinental and transregional links. While Christianity emerged in the early arrival of 
Christianity in the first century from Syria, it gave rise to an assimilated nature of South Indian 

 
79 Gnana Patrick, Public Theology: Indian Concerns, Perspectives, and Themes. (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress 

Press, 2020) 100. 
80 Ariarajah, Strangers or Co-pilgrims?, 239. 
81 Vinoth Ramachandra, Faiths in Conflict?: Christian Integrity in a Multicultural World. (Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 

1999) 167 
82 Chad M. Bauman, Pentecostals, Proselytization, and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India. (New York, 

NY: Oxford University Press, 2015), 76. 
83 Elizabeth Koepping, “India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma/Myanmar” in Peter C. Phan (ed). Christianities in Asia. 

(Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 26-27. 



Meloottu, “Indian Christianity” 
 

Global South Theological Journal 4, no. 2 (2025):  17 
 

Christianity with the Syrian tradition. Eventually, when the Portuguese arrived in the fifteenth century 
with their Catholic Christianity (along with their political and militaristic agenda), we see the Christianity 
in India going through the transitional modes of conquest, transregional migration, and resistance. 
However, as Portuguese rule waned with the rise of British presence, we also saw Christianity going 
through accommodation, Bible translation, and vernacularization, leading to the Christian face of social 
reform efforts. The era of translation opened a phase in Indian Christianity where the vernacular Bible 
became the authority in indigenizing the faith, giving rise to revivals that ushered Pentecostalism in India. 
This era also witnessed the various indigenization efforts of protestants and Catholics, which continue to 
occur in different parts of India.    

The history of Indian Christianity is not only the story of how foreigners have imparted their faith 
tradition to Indians (through their transcontinental links) but is also about how such traditions were 
received locally through assimilation, migration, resistance, vernacularization, revival, and indigenization. 
Through it all, today, in the context of a Hindu majority India, Indian Christianity stands as a polyvalent 
religion, where numerous forms of Christianity assembled under major Christian traditions—Catholic, 
Orthodox, Protestants, and Pentecostals & Independents, claiming to be truly South Indian and Christian. 
Even amid a polyvalent nature that embodies diversity, Indian Christianity collectively embodies some 
distinctive features. First, Monopolizing the fact that Christianity is a minority religion, the faith takes on 
a unique inter-religious nature of Indian through the notion of permeability. Second, within the context of 
multidimensional poverty and inequality, the face of Indian Christianity, irrespective of its various 
denominational diversity, embodies holistic mission as the right praxis of Christian faith. Finally, with the 
rise of the Hindutva uprising, Christianity as a minority religion is also under attack. However, the 
resilient nature of Christians in India is a living testament of Christ’s hope for the World.  


	Introduction
	Transitory modes in the history of Indian Christianity:
	Arrival and Assimilation:
	Conquest, Migration, and Resistance:
	Accommodation and Vernacularization:
	Revival and Indigenization:

	Statistical Overview
	Key Features of Contemporary Indian Christianity
	Inter-religious Nature of Christianity in the Context of Other Religions:
	Holistic Christianity in the Context of Multidimensional Poverty and Social Inequalities:
	Resilient Christianity in the Context of Persecution:

	Conclusion

