id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
gsjp-14129	OConnell, Daniel; Bautista, Ashley; Johnson, Clint; Venta, Amanda	Caution when Crowdsourcing: Prolific as a Superior Platform Compared with MTurk	2025	11	.pdf	application/pdf	6164	375	57	We found that only 9.89% of MTurk participants (N = 354) and 43.34% of Prolific participants (N = 345) produced high-quality data; Prolific also proved to be the more affordable option. Conversely, Litman et al. (2021) respond- ed in a paper sponsored by CloudResearch, a company that accesses MTurk participants and aims to improve upon Amazon’s platform.	cache/gsjp-14129.pdf	txt/gsjp-14129.txt