id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
grbs-1761	Wortley, John	Icons and Relics: a Comparison	2003	14	.pdf	application/pdf	4655	181	70	A considerable quan- tity of these had already been acquired by and deposited in the city of Constantine by that time; there is no reliable evidence that any of them were ever attacked or their efficacy called in question by the iconoclasts.1 Implicit in the argument (though not examined in that article) was the assumption that relic and icon were distinguished from each other in some very basic way (or ways) at that time. ” Megalê Hellenikê Egkyklopaideia 2 10 (Athens 1957) 899 col. 3. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 43 (2002/3) 161–174 © 2003 GRBS 162 ICONS AND RELICS These curiosities are exceptions, however, and should be set aside; for the most part the holy objects of Byzantium fall very clearly into one of two categories: icons (portrayals) and relics (things).	cache/grbs-1761.pdf	txt/grbs-1761.txt