Notes on the Inscription at Teos in Honor of Antiochus III Oliver, James H Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1968; 9, 3; ProQuest pg. 321 Notes on the Inscription at Teos in Honor of Antiochus III James H. Oliver I N the Turkish Historical Society's periodical which used to be called Anatolia Peter Herrmann, HAntiochos der Grosse und Teos," Anadolu (Anatolia) 9 (1965, offprint dated 1967) 29-160, has published with rich commentary and valuable discussion four blocks presenting one hundred sixty-eight lines from decrees in honor of Antiochus III and of his queen Laodice and nineteen lines of a royal letter from about 200 B.C. Teos had just been declared sacred and inviolable and recipro­ cated with divine honors. It is an excellent editio princeps which solves most of the textual problems. On Block I, p.35 line 29, read e[7TLJTEAEaEL for E[nJ TEAEaEL: Ka[~ TJa 28 ' [] \ ~ - , e - <:" 'f' , , <:' lie" P.EV UV V TEI\E L TWV aya WV OL WV ELS EvoaLp.oVLav TTapaytVE TJ f\ ._ TTOI\LS TJfLwv, Ta 8' e[7TL]TEAEUEL. This reading is assured by the version on Block II, p.37 line 31, as follows: iva OE Ka~ KaetE[pWP.E-] 30 [vos] 0 TOTTOS n TWt {JamAEL 'Avnoxwt MEyaAWt, ev eLt T(X fLEV e[TEA€UE] [ - '] e - ''',. I ,,-, f\ TWV a ya WV, Ta OE VTTEUXETO Kat p.ETa TaVTa ETTETEI\EUEV. On Block II, p.37 lines 27-28, where Herrmann notes the absence of a verb in the space for four letters at the end of line 26 and three letters at the beginning of line 27, the infinitive is probably TTavIEtV, which fits the sense. One letter-space remained vacant because of the need to respect syllabic division. TTav-J 27 [ <:'J ' , " 1 I I" - 1\ '~I [p , Etv U E Kat Tas EpyaaLas TTaaas Tas T EV TYJ TTOI\EL Kat TYJ XW Cf- Kat El-] [ 'J 1 ~ , 1 ,- < ') I I vaL E XEXtptaS TTam TTpOS TTavTas EV TTl TJ fLEpat TavTTI. 321 322 NOTES ON THE INSCRIPTION AT TEOS IN HONOR OF ANTIOCHUS m On Block II, p.38 lines 51 and 52-53, read €K(K)OVc!JU:T£V for {E}KOVcPLOW and (.LET' aUcPaAEtl [as- for (.LETaucPaAdl [uas- respectively. Haplography occurs frequently, e.g. Block I, line 33 (€7T7}ylAaTo) , Block n, line 20 (uv(.LOptwv) and line 24 (aAovs-), whereas it is hard to explain in any other way the intrusion of the epsilon of EKOYI:LIN. At the beginning of line 53 Herrmann has restored one letter too many as one may readily see from the photograph. The passage (lines 50-53) then reads: , <;" " " • A • Q \' , _'_\\' , E7TEtoTJ ov (.L0vov ELP7JV7JV TJ(.LLV ° fJaULI\EVS 7TapEUXEV al\/\a Kat [TWV] f3apEWv Kat UKATJpwv €K(K)OVcPLUW Els- TO (.LETa. TaiiTa TEAwv 7TapaAv- 52 [uas-] TWV uvvTagEWV. Kat AVULTEAEtS- Ta.S- €V Tfj xwpaL (.LET' aUcPaAd- [ J ' , , " , \ as 7T E7TOLTJKEV EpyaULas Kat Tas Kap7TELas-. KTI\. THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY May, 1968