The Mother of God of the Kanikleion GALAVARIS, GEORGE P Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Apr 1, 1959; 2, 2; ProQuest pg. 177 THE MOTHER OF GOD OF THE KANIKLEION GEORGE P. GALAVARIS A MONG THE LEAD BYZANTINE SEALS of the Th. Whittemore Collection in the Fogg Art Museum of Harvard Uni­ versity is this unpublished seal (Plate 9). Its dimensions are: 0.02 cm. diam. and 0.004 cm. thick. The obverse carries a standing figure of the Mother of God holding the Christ Child before her. In addition to the letters MP 6V, which stand for Mother of God, there is the following inscription runing in two columns: H KA NI KAI OTI CA M7}T'I1P eeov, iJ KaVLKAL6ncru - The Mother of God, the Kanikliotisa On the reverse is this metric inscription in four lines: . KEIIO .• IIANArN' ~t>KAInAN 8EO~ ••• [~] KE7TO [LIO] , IIavayv[e] ~OVKa 'Iwav ( VYJV ) eeo3' .. It reads in translation: "0 most pure, protect John Ducas ... " The third name on the seal, probably the name of another family with which the owner of the seal was related, has not been preserved complete.1 This invocation to the Virgin is well known from other metric Byzantine seals,2 while the Ducas family is known from texts and monuments of sigillog­ raphy.3 But any identification of our Ducas with a specific member of the family of Ducas remains uncertain. We can 1 For other examples of Byzantine persons with three names see H. Moritz, Die Zunamen bei den byzantinischen Historikern und Chronis ten, 1 (Landshut, 1896/98), 39-41. 2 V. Laurent, "Les bulles metriques dans la sigillographie byzantine," 'EAA'1J1LKtt, 4-8 (1931/35), passim; idem, La collection C. Orghidan (Paris, 1952), 337-339. In both works also bibilography on Byzantine seals. S Du Cange, Historia bll%antina, I (Familiae byzantinae), (Paris, 1680), 160-167; F. Chalandon, Jean II Comnene et Manuel I Comnene (Paris, 1912), Bee index; V. Laurent, "Un sceau inedit du protonotaire Basil KamateroB," Byzantion, 6 (1931), 266-268; idem, 'EXX'1J1LKa, 8 (1935), 327, index; idem, Collection OTghidan, 218, no. 428. Cf. B. Pantchenko, UCatalogue des plombs 180 GEORGE P. GALA VARIS [GRBS 2 only suggest an eleventh or a twelfth century date for the seal on the basis of the lettering of the inscriptions which finds parallels on other seals of this period.4 The representation of the Virgin on the obverse repro­ duces an iconographic type known as Virgin Kyriotissa/> an epithet which often accompanies the type on Byzantine seals.6 On our specimen, however, the type is accompanied by the epithet Kanikliotisa and it is on this epithet that we shall concentrate. Schlumberger had recognized the importance of the epithets which often accompany the figures of the Virgin on Byzantine seals.7 He had pointed out that some of these epi­ thets are not of a mystic or poetic nature, but indicate special icons of the Virgin which were worshipped in famous religious establishments. The brief list of such epithets collected by Schl urn berger was corrected and enlarged by Kondakov and Lichacev in their works on the iconography of the Virgin in which the evidence of the seals plays a major role. The relationship of seals to icons which these scholars have dem­ onstrated8 is of significance for the art historian, who is en­ abled to recreate the history of works of art now lost. It is also important for the student of Byzantine civilization in de la collection de l'Institut archeologique russe a. Constantinople," Bulletin de l'Institut archeologique russe, 9 (1904), 396; C. Konstantopoulos, BV!ClVTUIICti p.oAvf386f3ovAACl TCV EV ·AO.qVClLS 'EOI'. NOP.LCTP.ClTLICOV MOVCT£loti (Athens, 1917), 161. 4 Cf. Pantchenko, Bulletin, 8 (1903), 239, pI. XXXII, 8; Laurent Collection Orghidan, 172 pI. XLII, 335. Ii For the type of the Virgin Kyriotissa, i.e. of the icon which was worshipped in the church of Kyrou, see N. P. Kondakov, llKoHorpaqnuI BorOMaTepH, 2 (St. Petersburg, 1914/15), 141ft'.; M. Vloberg, "Les types iconographiques de la mere de Dieu dans l'art byzantin," Maria, etudes sur la Sainte Vierge, ed. H. du Manoir, 2 (Paris, 1952), 410. Cf. A. Xyngopoulos, KcmiAo,),os TWII ElIC611"1JI, MOVCT£LOV M'II'£vc1K17 (Athens, 1936),8. 8 G. Schlumberger, Sigillographie de '['empire byzantin (Paris, 1884), 39; N. Lich~ev, IIcTopH'IecKoe 3HalJeHHe HTaJIOrpalJeCKOH HKOHOIIHCH, H306paJKeHHH BoroMaTepH (St. Petersburg, 1911), fig. 140, pI. IV, 19. T Schlumberger, Sigillographie, 37ff.; idem, "La Vierge, Ie Christ, les Saintes sur les sceaux byzantins des Xe, Xle, XIIe siecles," Memoires des Antiquaires de France, (1888), 2ff. 8 See also the forthcoming paper "The Mother of God Stabbed with a Knife," in the Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 1959] THE MOTHER OF GOD OF THE KANIKLEION 181 general, who enriches his knowledge concerning the religious life of the Byzantines. The epithet which accompanies the Virgin on our seal is indeed neither of a mystic nor of a poetic nature. One can find it neither in the liturgy nor in the hymnology of the Byzantine church.9 The obvious assumption will be that here we have another case of a seal which copies an icon, the name of which derives either from a miracle, or from the name of the religious institution in which the icon was. For example the name 'Ecrc!>aYjLEV1] , "the slaughtered one," of an icon in the monastery of Vatopedi in Mt. Athos, has been obtained from a miracle;I° while names of some icons in Constantinople, such as Blachernitissa, Agiosoritissa and others, are derived from the names of the churches in which the icons were wor­ shipped. The first possibility has to be excluded because the epithet Kanikliotisa does not suggest a miracle. In fact it is related to KavLKAEtOv which was the inkpot of the Byzan­ tine emperor and to KaV'KAEto~ who was the man in charge of the imperial inkpot, i.e., the secretary of the emperor.ll Much later as Bees has shown the word KavLKAEtO~ appears as a family name in the Peloponnesus.12 But there is no reason to suggest any relation of the image of our seal with an icon of the Virgin related to the royal kanikleion, or to connect it with the family of the Kanikleios. The Byzantine texts, however, mention a palace under the name Kanikleion (TOV (3acrLALKov oLKov TOV AEYOjLEVOV KaVL­ KAELOV) Y It is known that this palace was transformed into a 9 For epithets of the Virgin in hymnography see S. Eustratiades, 'H 8foroKof ell rn ''"f'ILll0'Yparp,'!- (Paris, 1930); cf. G. Soteriou, "XpLunaPLKf7 Kal Bvtapnpf7 ElKoPo'Yparpia," 8foAo'Yia, 27 (1956), 13. 10 G. Soteriou, v A'YIOP "OpOf (Athens), 144; R. Dawkins, The AI onks of Athos (London, 1936), 361. 11 Pseudo-Codinus, De officialibus (Bonn, 1839), 206; for the function of this office see F. D6Iger, "Der Kodikellos des Christodulos in Palermo," Archiv filr Urkundenforschung, 11 (1929/30), 44-57. 12 N. Bees, "'0 OlKOf KavLKAfiov 71 KaviKA7) ... ," 'AKpiraf, 2 (1904), 405-407. 13 Du Cange, Historia byzantina, II (Constantinopolis christiana), 2, 169. Dr C. Mango of Dumbarton Oaks called to my attention the fact that the Council of 842, which restored the images took place in this palace. The relevant text reads: " ... KaL I1vvoliov Ofla.v Kal iEpo.II r01l"LKf7V ell rOls Ka.IILKAfloll 182 GEORGE P. GALAVARIS [GRBS 2 monastery probably by the middle of the tenth century.H It was certainly so in the eleventh century, because when the Comnenoi took over power and entered the capital in April 1, 1081, they looked for their mother and wives in the monastery of Kanikleion, where they had been confined by the emperor N ikephoros Botaniates.15 Although the texts keep silence as to the images which were worshipped in that monastery, there is no doubt that the image of our seal must be connected with this monastery. There must have been an icon of the Virgin known as Kanik­ liotisa after the name of the monastery to which a member of the family of Ducas must have had a special devotion in order to copy it on his seals. The study, then, of the seal of the Fogg Art Museum has added one more epithet of the Virgin hitherto unknown and brought evidence for the existence of another icon of Mary venerated in Constantinople. Furthermore another fact known to the iconographers of the Virgin in Byzantine art, can be re-stated: a name which accompanies the Virgin does not necessarily indicate the iconographic type. DUMBARTON OAKS. HARVARD UNIVERSITY 7rOn).,-al'TES ••• " See J. A. FabncIUs, Bibliotheca (JTaeca, 12 (Hamburg, 1809), 416; J. D. ManSI, Sacrorum concilwrum nova et amplissima collectio, ed, nov., 14 (Paris-LeIpzig, 1902),788. 14 R. Janm, La g€o(JTaphie eccwsiastique de l'empire b1lzantin, ill (Le8 eglise8 et les monastere8), (Paris, 1953), 286-287. 15 Janin, ibid., loc.cit. GALA V ARIS PLATE 9 COURTESY OF FOGG ART MUSEUM COURTESY OF FOGG ART MUSEUM OBVERSE REVERSE CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS. FOGG ART MUSEUM, HAR­ VARD UNIVERSITY. THOMAS WHITTEMORE COLLECTION. LEAD SEAL (Twice its Actual Size). BYZANTINE. 11 TH- 12TH CENTURY