Philistus Still Kopff, E Christian Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1976; 17, 3; ProQuest pg. 220 Philistus Still E. Christian Kopff A GRBS 17 (1976) 23-30 I collected various difficulties experi­ enced by scholars with Thucydides 7.42.3 and suggested what I took to be the most economical solution to those difficulties. Matthew W. Dickie, without proposing a new solution to the dilem­ mas of the passage, defends its authenticity by referring to 6.63.2 and Demosthenes' opinion that follows the parenthesis. I dealt with both passages at p.29 n.15. The correct but insufficient view that an army is most frightening on its arrival Thucydides attributes to the Syracusan mob and to Demosthenes, the foolish and the reckless, both on the eve of defeat. The passage I bracketed would have attrib­ uted the view to Thucydides himself. Other objections follow. (1) "The real problem of 7.42.3 is" the suggestion "that the first Athenian attack on Syracuse came after the winter spent at Catana . . . . There is no reason at all to think that Philistus believed that the Athenians did not attack Syracuse until the spring of 414 B.C. In short, ... " my solution "simply transfers the problem from Thucyd­ ides to Philistus" (Dickie, pp.217f). We know that Philistus differed from Thucydides on material points (pp.27-28). We do not know that the quotations would have been a contradiction in his anti­ Nician account. The remarks may have been spoken in direct dis­ course by Demosthenes, Menander or Euthydemus; the latter two are important figures in Philistus' account but are hardly mentioned by Thucydides. (2) Ka2 av'T~C following the bracketed passage means "he too," and by implying a reference to someone other than Demosthenes who was most frightening on arrival, the phrase protects the parenthesis (Dickie p.218). "Denniston was once heard saying to a pupil,