A New "Graffito" from Ephesus Marcovich, Miroslav Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1973; 14, 1; ProQuest pg. 61 A New Graffito from Ephesus Miroslav Marcovich D URING the Austrian excavations at Bulbul Dag (the ancient Ephesus) in 1970 a Greek wall graffito was discovered in a house (late II century).1 Its text, as published by Werner Jobst,2 runs as follows: "'Q EVAaAt xalpe OEOLe 7rE7rOO7j/-LEVOV JI I "Y"'" ovvop.a CEP.VOV" EEt ':> 7]e c[v] EEl Ka~ flloc. AvgavlTw ~ \ ~" , 5 7Tacw yap 'f'tl\tav 7TapEXEtC ayaOaLeL 7rpOVOlaLe owpa Kat. EVcPpoevvae ~e €XEtc ap.flpocV7]c. We do not know how the editor understands this text, for he gives no translation of the inscription; but so far it seems to be clear that he sees in the graffito a dedication (Weihung) to the god Apollo (p.244): "Dass auch in unserer Inschrift mit EVAaAoe Apollon angesprochen sein kann, legt der Inhalt des Textes nahe." I would challenge this conclusion, however, while seeing in the inscription a late antique complimentary epigram, addressed to a mortal Eulalius. Accordingly, I would suggest the following reading of the graffito: eQ } EVA&A£ XaLpE, BEOLC 7TE7TOO7]p.lvov ovvop.a CEP.VOV· , \ r~{} , ,\ \ Q' 'c:.' aLEt ,:>7] C ,c aLEL Kat {J£OC avbaVETW. flu-CLV yap cPL>..lav 7raplXEtc ayaOaLCL 7rpovolatc ~~ \,~, ... " {}' Q I owpa Kat EV,/,POCVV7JC 7] C EXEt C CXP.{JpOCL7]C. -£c seems to go back to the middle of the third century B.C. Consequently, EV~&'A£c for EVA&'Awc follows the pattern of 'Ap.p.wvap£c, 'A7TO>">"WV£C, IlTo~Ep.a£c, Novp.ijv£c, etc.3 (c) As for the vocative of E?JA&'A£C, A. Wilhelm' adduced eight examples from the inscriptions: 'AAvm, rvp.vaa, Ev,,€v£, fHp.€p£, KTtcn, JI'T]yan, JI£clo£, fY7TEP€X£. To these D. J. Georgacas has added six more examples:' A7TO>">"dlv£, 'AcPpoo{n, r"vpy£,LJ'T]P.~TP£. LJwvVct,EiJ-rvX£.5 Jobst, however, takes EVAM£ to stand for EVAaAE, while interpreting it as an epithet of Apollo, with reference to Anth.Gr. 9.525.6. This is not likely for the following reasons: (a) Anth.Gr. 9.525 is no more than a late antique Spielerei without real religious value: in 24 lines no less than 96 epithets of Apollo are produced (four in each line) in alpha­ betical order.6 A simple comparison of these epithets with C. F. H. Bruchmann's Epitheta deorum shows that most of them are elsewhere unknown as applied to Apollo. And (b) EVAaAoc is not as rare in Greek literature as Jobst takes it to be, being misled by LSJ s.v. We find it also in Anth.Gr. 5.148 and 155 (Meleager, Epigr. 47 and 48= 4242 and 4244 [Gow-Page]; 9.570.2 (Philo demus, Epigr. 14= 3241 [G.-P.]); 9.229.2 (Marcus Argentarius, Epigr. 24= 1428 [G.-P.]). 11'€11'o(JTJl.L€vov: cf. Hymn. Orph. 81.3 (Quandt) 11'€11'o(J'T]p.€va£ opp.o£c (sc. a~pa£); 46.2; 33.8. • Cf E. Schwyzer, Griechische Grammatik, I (Munich 1939) 472, with literature; E. Mayser, Grammatik der gr;ech. Papyril 1.2 (Berlin 1938) 15f; E. Nachmanson, Laure und Formen der magnetischen InschTiften (Uppsala 1903) 125; S. B. Psaltes, Grammatik der byzantinischen Chro­ niken (Gottingen 1913) 43ff; and especially D. J. Georgacas, "On the Nominal Endings -'C,-w in Later Greek," CP 43 (1948) 213-60. 'A. Wilhelm, in WS 24 (1902) 596-000. G Georgacas, op.cit. (supra n.3) 243 n.l and 249. • Cf H. StadtmUller ad Anth.Gr. 9.524, and A. Dieterich, "ABC-Denkmliler," RhMus 56 (1901) 94. MIROSLAV MARCOVICH 63 LINE 2. tE~ for alE~ (twice): the change at > E seems to go back to the fourth century B.C.7 c': C~ being elided, though emphatic, can be paralleled by Soph. OC Boof 7T6TEpa VOP.l~EtC OVCTVXEtV ;p.' tc Ta ca, I ~ ,. \ ,..,.. \ \ OT 64 .1. \ 1\ '\ \,. ,.. I C E"C Ta caVTOV f.LaIlJ\OV ... ; .,.,VXTJ 7TOI\LV TE" Kaf.LE" KaL C 0f.L0V CTEVEL. 332 EyW OUT' Ef.LaVTOV OUT€ c' &,xyvvw. Eur. Tro. 945 ov c', &M' Ef.LavT~v.8 As for the hyperbaton of d, cf Eur. Med. 759£ &,\A& c' 0 Malac 7T0f.L7Taioc avag 17T€,x&CELE o6f.L0tc. Rhes. 216f; Ale. 743f7Tp6rppwv c€ X06VL6c 0' 'Epf.Lijc I flALOTJC TE" O/XOLT'. Andr. 122, 517f. LINE 4. &f.LfJPOCVTJc: v for L is common enough.9 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS November, 1972 7 Cf Schwyzer, op.cit. (supra n.3) 1.233; E. MayserJH. Schmoll, Grammatik der griech. Papyri 1.1 (Berlin 1970) 85f. 8 Cf I. Bekker, Homerische Blatter II (Bonn 1872) 229-31. t Cf Mayser/Schmoll, op.cit. (supra n.7) 1.1.8off.