Microsoft Word - 006MW GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 Gusau Journal of AccountingandFinance (GUJAF) Vol.5Issue1,April,2024ISSN:2756-665X A Publication of DepartmentofAccountingandFinance, Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, FederalUniversityGusau,ZamfaraState-Nigeria ©DepartmentofAccountingandFinance GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 ii Vol.5Issue1 April, 2024 ISSN:2756-665X A Publication of DepartmentofAccountingandFinance, Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, FederalUniversityGusau,ZamfaraState-Nigeria All Rightsreserved Except for academic purposes no part or whole of this publication is allowed to be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means be it mechanical,electrical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise,withoutpriorpermissionofthe Copyright owner. Publishedandprinted by: AhmaduBelloUniversityPressLimited,Zaria Kaduna State, Nigeria. Tel:08065949711,069-879121 e-mail: abupress2013@gmail.comabupress2020@y ahoo.com Website:www.abupress.com.ng GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 iii EDITORIALBOARD Editor-in-Chief: Prof.ShehuUsman Hassan DepartmentofAccounting,FederalUniversityofKashere,Gombe State. Associate Editor: Dr.MuhammadMustapha Bagudo DepartmentofAccounting,Ahmadu BelloUniversityZaria, Kaduna State. ManagingEditor: UmarFaroukAbdulkarim DepartmentofAccountingand Finance,FederalUniversityGusau, ZamfaraState. Editorial Board Prof.AhmadModuKumshe Departmentof Accounting,UniversityofMaiduguri,BornoState. ProfUgochukwuC.Nzewi Departmentof Accounting,PaulUniversityAwka,AnambraState. Prof KabirTahirHamid DepartmentofAccounting, BayeroUniversity,Kano,Kano State. Prof.EkojaB.Ekoja Departmentof Accounting, Universityof Jos. Prof.CliffordOfurum Departmentof Accounting, Universityof PortHarcourt,Rivers State. Prof.AhmadBello Dogarawa Departmentof Accounting,AhmaduBelloUniversityZaria. Prof.Yusuf.B. Rahman DepartmentofAccounting,LagosStateUniversity,Lagos State. Prof.SuleimanA.S.Aruwa DepartmentofAccounting,NasarawaStateUniversity, Keffi,Nasarawa State. Prof.MuhammadJunaidu Kurawa Departmentof Accounting, BayeroUniversityKano,KanoState. Prof.MuhammadHabibuSabari DepartmentofAccounting,Ahmadu BelloUniversity, Zaria. Prof.OkpanachiJoshua GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 iv Departmentof AccountingandManagement,NigerianDefenceAcademy,Kaduna. Prof.HassanIbrahim DepartmentofAccounting, IBBUniversity, Lapai,Niger State. Prof.IfeomaMaryOkwo DepartmentofAccounting,EnuguStateUniversityofScienceandTechnology,EnuguState. Prof.AminuIsah DepartmentofAccounting, BayeroUniversity,Kano,Kano State. Prof.AhmaduBello DepartmentofAccounting,Ahmadu BelloUniversity, Zaria. Prof.MusaYelwaAbubakar DepartmentofAccounting,Usmanu DanfodiyoUniversity,Sokoto State. Prof.SalisuAbubakar DepartmentofAccounting,Ahmadu BelloUniversityZaria, Kaduna State. Prof.SunusiSa'ad Ahmad Departmentof Accounting,FederalUniversityDutse,JigawaState. Prof.Isaq AlhajiSamaila DepartmentofAccounting, BayeroUniversity,Kano State. Dr.FatimaAlfa DepartmentofAccounting,UniversityofMaiduguri,BornoState. Dr.NasiruA.Ka’oje Departmentof Accounting,UsmanuDanfodiyoUniversitySokotoState. Dr.Aminu Abdullahi Departmentof Accounting,UsmanuDanfodiyoUniversitySokoto,State. Dr.OnipeAdebenege Yahaya DepartmentofAccounting,NigerianDefenceAcademy,Kaduna State. Dr.Saidu Adamu DepartmentofAccounting,FederalUniversityofKashere,Gombe State. Dr.NasiruYunusa Departmentof Accounting,AhmaduBelloUniversityZaria. Dr.Aisha Nuhu Muhammad Departmentof Accounting,AhmaduBelloUniversityZaria. Dr. Lawal Muhammad Departmentof Accounting,AhmaduBelloUniversityZaria. GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 v Dr.Farouk Adeza SchoolofBusinessandEntrepreneurship,AmericanUniversityofNigeria,Yola. Dr.BashirUmar Farouk DepartmentofEconomics,FederalUniversityGusau,Zamfara State. DrEmmanuel Omokhuale DepartmentofMathematics,FederalUniversityGusau,Zamfara. State ADVISORYBOARDMEMBERS Prof. Kabiru Isah Dandago, Bayero University Kano,Kano State.ProfAMBashir,UsmanuDanfodiyoUniversitySokoto,SokotoState . Prof. Muhammad Tanko, Kaduna State University, Kaduna. Prof.BayeroA MSabir,UsmanuDanfodiyo UniversitySokoto,Sokoto State. Prof.AliyuSulaimanKantudu, BayeroUniversityKano, KanoState. Editorial Secretary YazidKabirIbrahim DepartmentofAccountingand Finance,FederalUniversityGusau, ZamfaraState. GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 vi CALLFOR PAPERS The editorial board of Gusau Journal of Accounting and Finance (GUJAF) is hereby inviting authors to submit their unpublished manuscript for publication. The journal is published in two issues of April and October annually. GUJAF is a double-blind peer reviewed journal published by the Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, Federal UniversityGusau, Zamfara State Nigeria The Journal accepts papersin all areas of Accounting and Finance for publication which include: Accounting Standards, Accounting Information System, Financial Reporting, Earnings Management, , Auditing and Investigation, Auditing and Standards, Public Sector Accounting and Auditing, Taxation and Revenue Administration, Corporate Governance Issues, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and Environmental Reporting Issue, Information and Communication TechnologyIssues, BankruptcyPrediction, Corporate Finance, Personal Finance, Merger and Acquisitions, Capital Structure, Working Capital Management, Enterprises Risk Management, Entrepreneurship, International Business Accounting and Finance, Banking Crises, Bank‘s Profitability, Risk and Insurance Issue, Islamic Finance, Conventional and Islamic Banks and so forth. GUIDELINESFORSUBMISSIONANDMANUSCRIPT FORMAT The submission language is English and must be a well-researched original manuscript that has not previously been submitted elsewhere for publication. The paper should not exceed more than 15 pages on A4 type paper in MS-word format, 1.5-line spacing, 12 Font size in Times new roman. Manuscript should be tested for plagiarism before submission, as the maximum similarity index acceptable by GUJAF is 25 percent. Furthermore, the length of a complete article should not exceed 5000 words including an abstract of not more than 250 words with a minimum of four key words immediately after the abstract. All references including in text citation and reference list, tables and figures should be in line with APA 7th Edition publication manual. Finally, manuscript should be send to our email address elfarouk105@gmail.comand a copy to our website on journals.gujaf.com.ng GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 vii PUBLICATION PROCEDURE After receiving a manuscript that is within the similarity index threshold, a confirmation email will be send together with a request to pay a review proceeding fee.At this point, the editorial board will take a decision on accepting, rejecting or making a resubmission of the manuscript based on the outcome of the double-blind peer review. Those authors whose manuscript were accepted for publication will be asked to pay a publication fee, after effecting all suggested corrections and changes made on the manuscript. All corrected papers returned within the specified time frame will be published in that issue. PAYMENTDETAILS Bank:FCMB AccountNumber:7278465011 AccountName:Gusau Journalof Accountingand Finance FORINQUIRY TheHead, Department of Accounting and Finance, FederalUniversityGusau,ZamfaraState. elfarouk105@gmail.com +2348069393824 FORMOREINFORMATION, CONTACT TheEditor-in-Chiefon+2348067766435 TheAssociateEditoron+2348036057525 ORvisit ourwebsiteonwww.gujaf.com.ngorjournals.gujaf.com.ng GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 439 THE INTERPLAY OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY, DIGITAL TRADE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONON SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ADVANCED ECONOMIES Nageri Kamaldeen Department of Accounting Science, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa nagerikamadeen0@gmail.comhttps://d oi.org/10.57233/gujaf.v5i1.22 Abstract This study investigates the combined effects of fintech readiness, digital trade openness, mineral resource rents, and environmental policy stringency on economic growth across OECD countries from 2000 to 2023. Utilizing the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR), the analysis reveals heterogeneous impacts across the growthdistribution,wherefintechreadinessanddigitaltradeconsistentlypromotegrowth,whiledependenceon mineral rents tends to constrainit. Environmental policystringencyemerges as a significant positive moderator, indicating that stringent environmental regulations can support sustainable economic expansion without hindering development. These findings highlight the importance of integrating technological innovation, trade facilitation, resource management, and environmental governance in crafting growth policies. The study contributes to the literature on sustainable economic development and digital transformation by providing nuanced insights relevant to policymakers and stakeholders in advanced economies. Keywords:FintechreadinessdigitaltrademineralresourcerentsenvironmentalpolicyeconomicgrowthOECD JELCodes:O40O33Q32F15 1.0 Introduction The role of financial institutions as catalysts for economic growth has been extensively documented in economic literature (Beck et al., 2007). The rapid advancement of financial technology (fintech) has introduced transformative changes within financial sectors worldwide, facilitating greater financial inclusion, efficiency, and innovation (Arner, Barberis, & Buckley, 2016).Fintech readiness, whichdenotestheextent to which acountry‘s financial ecosystem is prepared to adopt and integrate fintech solutions, has emerged as a critical pillar influencing economic development (Zhang et al., 2022). Its integration within the economic framework offers promising avenues for accelerating growth by improving access to finance and optimizing resource allocation, especially in advanced economies such as those within the OECD. Digital trade has reshaped international commerce by lowering transaction costs, expanding market reach, and enabling novel business models (Baldwin & Freeman, 2021). The rise of digitaltradecomplementsfintechreadiness,asthedigitizationoffinancialservicesunderpins cross- border e-commerce and facilitates smoother capital flows (Constantinescu, Mattoo, & Ruta,2019).GiventhatOECDcountriesareattheforefrontofdigitalinfrastructureandtrade liberalization, exploring the nexus between fintech readiness and digital trade is vital to understanding their combined impact on economic growth in this group of nations. Natural resource rents, particularly from minerals, remain a significant source of revenue for many OECD countries, although their relationship with economic growth is complex and multifaceted (Sadorsky, 2011). While resource abundance can provide critical financial resourcesfordevelopment,itmayalsogenerateeconomicvulnerabilitiessuchasthe ―resourcecurseǁorDutchdiseaseeffects,whichcanhamperdiversifiedeconomicgrowth GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 440 (Auty, 2001; van der Ploeg, 2011). Moreover, the interaction between resource rents and fintech or digital trade has not been thoroughly examined in extant literature, presenting an opportunityto deepen theunderstandingofhowthesefactors collectivelyinfluenceeconomic trajectories. The rising awareness of environmental sustainability has introduced environmental policy stringency (EPS) as a crucial moderating factor in economic development (OECD, 2020). EPS reflects the rigor of environmental regulations and policies designed to mitigate ecological degradation and promote green growth. Increasing policy stringency can both challenge and stimulate economic activity by influencing industrial practices, innovation incentives, and investment flows (Ambec et al., 2013). In the context of OECD countries, where environmental standards are relatively high, assessing the role of EPS alongsidefintech readiness, digital trade, and resource rents offers valuable insights into sustainable growth paradigms. Several have examined the individual impacts of fintech on economic growth (Kim, 2021), digital trade on GDP expansion (Freund & Weinhold, 2004), or resource rents on growth volatility (Im & Mah, 2021). Integrated analyses considering the simultaneous effects of fintech readiness, digital trade, mineral resource rents, and environmental policies remain sparse. This study fills this gap by adopting a comprehensive approach that accounts for the interplay among these factors within OECD economies from 2000 to 2023. This studyapplies the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR), which provides a robust framework for capturing heterogeneous effects across different quantiles of economic growth distribution (Machado & Silva, 2019). This approach enables a nuanced understanding ofhow fintech readiness, digital trade, resource rents, and environmental policy stringency influence economic growth not only on average but also at various points of the growth spectrum. The findings are expected to inform policymakers on optimizing financialstrategies to foster inclusive and sustainable growth in the OECD context. 2.0 LiteratureandHypotheses Empirical Review Empirical research has significantly advanced our understanding of the multifaceted drivers of economic growth, with particular emphasis on the roles of fintech development, digital trade, natural resource rents, and environmental policy frameworks. Fintech readiness, broadly conceptualized as a country‘s capacity to integrate digital financial services effectively, has been shown to exert a positive influence on economic growth across multiple contexts. Kim (2021) provided early empirical evidence indicating that OECD countries with higherfintech readinessindicesexperiencedaccelerated GDP growthrates between2010 and 2018. This finding is corroborated by Zhang, Goh, and Lai (2022), who employed panel data econometrics to demonstrate that fintech readiness enhances financial inclusion and investment efficiency, thereby stimulating economic performance. Expanding on fintech‘s influence, several studies have examined its interaction with digital trade. Baldwin and Freeman (2021) analyzed the evolution of digital trade flows within OECD and non-OECD economies and found that digital trade liberalization, supported by robust fintech ecosystems, lowers transaction costs and improves market access, contributing to higher growth rates. Constantinescu, Mattoo, and Ruta (2019) provided micro-level evidence that digital trade fosters innovation diffusion and competitiveness, particularly in knowledge-intensivesectors.FreundandWeinhold(2004)earlierdocumentedthatthe GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 441 expansion of internet infrastructure significantly boosted bilateral trade volumes, an effect amplified in countries with advanced fintech infrastructure. The role of natural resource rents, particularly mineral resources, has received nuanced empirical attention. While resource wealth can generate substantial fiscal revenues, empirical evidencesuggests aconditional relationship with economic growth dependingon governance quality and diversification efforts. Im and Mah (2021) analyzed a global sample, including OECD countries, and found that resource rents positively contribute to growth only in the presence of strong institutional frameworks. Similarly, Sadorsky (2011) demonstrated that resource-rich countries tend to experience volatile growth patterns due to commodity price fluctuations, necessitating sophisticated financial systems and policy buffers to mitigate adverse effects. Van der Ploeg (2011) synthesized empirical findings confirming thatresource abundance often leads to Dutch disease phenomena unless accompanied byproactive policy measures. Environmental policy stringency (EPS) has emerged as a critical moderating factor influencing the relationship between resource exploitation, technological innovation, and growth. Ambec et al. (2013) reviewed empirical studies and found robust support for the Porter Hypothesis, which posits that stringent environmental regulations can induce innovation that offsets compliance costs and fosters competitiveness. OECD (2020) provided quantitative measures of EPS and demonstrated that stricter policies correlate with increased investments in green technologies, contributing to sustainable economic growth. Recent empirical works, such as those by Jiang et al. (2023), have examined how EPS interacts with fintech readiness and digital trade to promote greener growth pathways, highlighting the importance of integrated policy frameworks. Lee and Oh (2020) used panel quantile regression to examine the joint effects of fintech adoption,digitaltradeopenness,and environmentalregulationoneconomicgrowthacross30 OECD countries. Their findings revealed heterogeneous impacts, with fintech and digital trade exerting stronger positive effects in countries with moderate to high EPS levels. Similarly, Wang et al. (2022) applied system-GMM estimations to assess the dynamic linkages among resource rents, fintech development, and green growth, concluding that fintech readiness enhances the capacity of resource-rich economies to transition towards sustainability. Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) highlight that strong institutions foster innovation adoption and efficient resource allocation, which are vital in leveraging fintech innovations and digital trade benefits. More recently, Dabla-Norris et al. (2020) employed cross-country panel datato show that governance indicators, includingrule of law and regulatoryquality, significantly moderate the relationship between resource wealth and economic performance, with better governance amplifying the positive growth effects of resource rents. These findings emphasize that OECD countries with robust institutional frameworks are better positioned to harness fintech and digital trade advancements to support sustainable growth. The emergence of green fintech has added a novel dimension to the nexus between financial technology and environmental policy. Green fintech has been linked to improvements in environmental outcomes and economic efficiency. Liu et al. (2022) indicates that green fintech adoption in OECD countries facilitates the flow of capital into renewable energy projects and green infrastructure, thereby reinforcing the positive effects of environmental policystringencyongrowth.Chenetal.2023)documentedthatdigitalplatformssupporting GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 442 carbon trading and green bonds are accelerating the transition to low-carbon economies, demonstrating the practical mechanisms through which fintech contributes to both economic and environmental objectives. Lastly, recent papers has explored the potential nonlinearities and threshold effects in the relationshipsamongfintechreadiness,digitaltrade,naturalresourcerents, andenvironmental policies. Studies employing advanced econometric models, such as threshold regressions and quantile models, reveal that the positive impact of fintech and digital trade on growth maybe contingent on surpassing certain levels of environmental policy stringency or institutional quality. Zhang et al. (2024) found that in OECD countries with lax environmental policies, fintech readiness alone yields limited growth benefits; however, once a minimum EPS threshold is crossed, fintech‘s contribution to green innovation and economic expansion significantly increases. This highlights the importance of coordinated policy frameworks that simultaneously enhance fintech infrastructure, promote digital trade, and enforce environmental regulations to achieve sustainable development goals. Hypotheses Development Financialtechnology(fintech)hasemergedasatransformativeforceacrossglobaleconomies by enhancing financial inclusion, improving efficiency, and reducing transaction costs.OECD countries have seen fintech readiness serve as a proxy for digital infrastructure, innovation capability, and institutional preparedness for the digital economy (Kou et al., 2021). These factors collectively enable more effective resource mobilization, innovation in credit markets, and the expansion of alternative finance mechanisms such as peer-to-peer lending, blockchain-based platforms, and AI-driven financial services (Ozili, 2021). Empirical findings indicate that economies with higher fintech adoption rates tend to experience increased productivity and investment activity, especially in knowledge-intensive sectors (Bazarbash & Beaton, 2020). Thus, fintech readiness is not only a technological upgrade but a systemic shift in financial intermediation that can positively affect economic growth. The positive impact of fintech readiness on economic performance is conditional upon supportive regulatory and institutional frameworks. OECD countries offer favorable environments with strong legal systems, secure digital infrastructure, and innovation-friendly policies, making them ideal for fintech to flourish. Demirgüç-Kunt et al. (2020) highlights that digital financial systems enhance macroeconomic stability by improving financial resilience and reducing volatility. These effects are more pronounced when fintech is complemented by data governance, cybersecurity measures, and digital literacy programs. Thus, countries that have advanced in fintech readiness often show sustained increases in gross domestic product (GDP) due to improved financial access, increased savings, and broader capital formation. H1: Fintech readiness has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in OECD countries. Digital trade, encompassing cross-border e-commerce, data flows, and digitally enabled services,hasbecomeacrucialdriverofglobaleconomicintegration.OECDnationsareat the forefront of this transformation, benefiting from sophisticated digital infrastructure and trade liberalization frameworks that support the free flow of data and digital goods. According to López González and Ferencz (2018), digital trade reduces barriers to market entry, enables SMEs to access global markets, and enhances supply chain efficiencies, thereby contributing toGDPgrowth.Furthermore,theCOVID-19pandemichasaccelerateddigitaltrade GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 443 adoption, with digital exports increasing in sectors such as education, healthcare, and finance (UNCTAD,2021).Asaresult,countries withhighdigitaltradeintensityarebetterpositioned to diversify their economies and mitigate external shocks. Digitaltradepromotestechnologicalspilloversandproductivitygainsacrosssectors.Timmer et al. (2020) demonstrate that the integration of digital platforms into trade logistics increases thecompetitivenessofexport-orientedindustries.OECDcountriesalsotendtoinvestmorein intangible capital that complements digital trade. These investments foster innovation and scale economies, leading to higher GDP per capita. The gains from digital trade are contingent upon regulatory alignment, data privacy standards, and digital trade agreements. Countries that harmonize such frameworks tend to benefit more significantly from digital trade-induced growth. H2: Digital trade positively contributes to economic growth in OECD countries. While natural resource rents have traditionallycontributed to economic development through export revenues and investment inflows, the resource curse literature cautions that such rents maylead to institutional weakening, volatility, and environmental degradation if not properly managed (Van der Ploeg &Poelhekke, 2017). However, stringent environmental policies can mitigate these risks by ensuring that resource extraction is subject to sustainability standards, technological upgrading, and reinvestment in human capital (Albrizio et al., 2017). In OECD countries, where institutional quality is relatively high, environmental policy stringency(EPS)canenhancethe efficiencyof resourceuse andincentivizegreeninnovation. Resource- rich nations with strict EPS are more likely to implement carbon pricing, resource taxes, and subsidies for renewable energy, thus achieving both ecological and economic objectives. EPS may act as a moderator that strengthens the positive effects of fintech readiness and digital trade on growth. Empirical work by Zhang et al. (2024) shows that environmental policy stringency enhances the impact of digital technologies by directing innovation toward energy efficiency, emissions reduction, and circular economy practices. In this context,digital trade and fintech serve not only as growth enablers but as vehicles for sustainable transformation. Therefore, the interaction between EPS and these digital variables may produce nonlinear effects on economic performance. This synergy suggests that stringent environmental policies do not hinder growth; rather, they enable economies to grow in a cleaner,moreresilientmanner. H3:Environmentalpolicy stringencypositivelymoderatesthe relationshipbetweendigitalization(fintechreadinessanddigitaltrade)andeconomicgrowth in OECD countries. 3.0 Methodology This study investigates the impact of fintech readiness, digital trade, and natural resource rents on economic growth, with a moderating role of environmental policy stringency in OECD countries. The analysis spans the period from 2000 to 2023, drawing on annual panel data from multiple reliable sources. Economic growth is measured using the real GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$), sourced from the World Bank's World Development Indicators (WDI). Fintech readiness is proxied by the ICT infrastructure index, composed of indicators such as internet penetration, broadband subscriptions, and mobile cellular subscriptions, obtained from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU, 2023). Digital trade is captured by a composite index derived from cross-border e-commerce activity and digital service exports, drawn from UNCTAD‘s Digital Economy Report (UNCTAD, 2022) and the OECD Digital Trade Indicators. GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 444 Natural resource rents are expressed as a percentage of GDP, reflecting the monetary value derived from natural resource exploitation, including oil, minerals, and forest rents (World Bank, 2023). Environmental policy stringency (EPS) is based on the OECD‘s Environmental Policy Stringency Index, which ranges from 0 (not stringent) to 6 (most stringent), and reflects the rigidity of environmental laws and regulations in a given country (Botta & Kozluk, 2014). Several control variables are included to account for macroeconomic and institutional influences on economic growth: trade openness (exports + imports as % of GDP), human capital (proxied by gross tertiary enrollment ratio), gross capital formation (% of GDP), and institutional quality (measured using World Governance Indicators). Table 1 provides definitions for all variables employed. Table 1. VariableDescription andData Sources Variable Description Source GDPpc RealGDPpercapita(constant2015US$) WorldBank(WDI) FintechReadiness ICTInfrastructureIndex(internet,broadband, mobile subscriptions) ITU(2023) DigitalTrade Indexofcross-bordere-commerceanddigital serviceexports UNCTAD(2022);OECD ResourceRents Totalnaturalresourcerents(%ofGDP) WorldBank(WDI) EPS Environmental Policy Stringency Index (scale: 0– 6) OECD (2023); Botta& Kozluk(2014) TradeOpen Tradeopenness(%of GDP) WorldBank(WDI) HumanCapital Tertiaryschoolenrollment(%gross) WorldBank(WDI) CapitalFormation Grosscapitalformation(%ofGDP) WorldBank(WDI) InstitutionQuality Compositeindexofruleoflaw,controlofcorruption, regulatory quality WorldBank(WGI, 2023) Source:Author(2024) To examine the heterogeneity in the effect of fintech readiness, digital trade, and resource rentson economic growth across different quantiles of income distribution, the study employs the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) by Machado and Silva (2019). This method allows the estimation of conditional quantile effects in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity, addressing issues of endogeneity and non-normal error distributions common in panel data. Thebaselineempiricalmodelisspecifiedas: GDPpc𝑖𝑡=𝛼(𝜏)+𝛽1(𝜏)FintechReadiness𝑖𝑡+𝛽2(𝜏)DigitalTrade𝑖𝑡+𝛽3(𝜏)ResourceRents𝑖𝑡 + 𝛽4(𝜏)EPS𝑖𝑡 + 𝛾′(𝜏)X𝑖𝑡+ 𝜇𝑖(𝜏) + 𝜀𝑖𝑡(𝜏) (1) Where: GDPpc𝑖𝑡is the real GDP per capita for country 𝑖at time 𝑡, 𝛼(𝜏) is the quantile- specific intercept, 𝛽𝑘(𝜏) are the quantile-dependent slope coefficients for each variable, X𝑖𝑡is avectorofcontrolvariablesincludingtradeopenness,humancapital,capitalformation,and institutional quality, 𝜇𝑖(𝜏) represents unobserved individual effects, and 𝜀𝑖𝑡(𝜏) is the idiosyncratic error term. To account for the moderating role of environmental policy stringency on the relationship between digital drivers and growth, interaction terms are introduced in the augmented model: GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 445 GDPpc𝑖𝑡=𝛼(𝜏)+𝛽1(𝜏)FintechReadiness𝑖𝑡+𝛽2(𝜏)DigitalTrade𝑖𝑡+𝛽3(𝜏)ResourceRents𝑖𝑡 +𝛽4(𝜏)EPS𝑖𝑡+𝛽5(𝜏)(FintechReadiness𝑖𝑡×EPS𝑖𝑡) ′ +𝛽6(𝜏)(DigitalTrade𝑖𝑡×EPS𝑖𝑡)+𝛾(𝜏)X𝑖𝑡+𝜇𝑖(𝜏)+𝜀𝑖𝑡(𝜏) (2) Equation(2)enablesananalysisof whethertheeffectoffintechreadinessanddigitaltradeon economicgrowthiscontingentuponthelevelofenvironmentalpolicystringency.Thismodel is estimated at various quantiles (e.g., 0.25, 0.50, 0.75) to capture differential impacts across countries at different levels of economic development within the OECD. The econometric strategy employed in this study builds upon the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) proposed by Machado and Silva (2019), allowing for the estimation of heterogeneous effects of explanatory variables across the distribution of economic growth. Unlike traditional conditional mean models such as fixed or randomeffects models, the MMQR framework captures how fintech readiness, digital trade, and resource rents affect economic performance at different points (quantiles) of the GDP per capita distribution, thus addressing distributional asymmetries and unobserved heterogeneity. The MMQR estimator operates by transforming the model into a quantile regression through a location-scale representation. Let the economic growth outcome 𝑌𝑖𝑡≡ GDPpc𝑖𝑡be: 𝑌𝑖𝑡= 𝛼𝑖+𝑋𝑖𝑡′𝛽+𝜎(𝑋𝑖𝑡)𝑈𝑖𝑡 (3) Where: 𝛼𝑖captures individual-specific fixed effects, 𝑋𝑖𝑡is a vector of regressors (including fintech readiness, digital trade, natural resource rents, environmental stringency, and control variables), 𝛽is a vector of parameters, 𝜎(𝑋𝑖𝑡) is a scale function allowing for heteroskedasticity, 𝑈𝑖𝑡 ~ 𝑈(0,1) represents uniformly distributed innovations capturing quantile heterogeneity. Quantile𝜏∈(0,1)isrecoveredbysolvingthemomentcondition:𝔼[𝜏(𝑈𝑖𝑡)|𝑋𝑖𝑡]=0,where 𝜏(𝑈) = 𝜏 − 𝟙(𝑈 ≤ 𝜏),and𝟙(·)istheindicatorfunction.Thisconditionallowsthe estimation of 𝛽(𝜏), i.e., the impact of each covariate on a specific conditional quantile ofGDP per capita. To account for endogeneity concerns, especially potential reverse causality between economic growth and fintech development, the MMQR framework is supplemented with instrumented covariates where necessary, using external instruments such as lagged values or predetermined indicators. In particular, the scale function 𝜎(𝑋𝑖𝑡) helps correct for heteroskedasticity and provides robustness to distributional assumptions. Two alternative estimators are used for robustness checks: Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) and Dynamic PLS (DOLS). These methods control for cointegration relationships and dynamic endogeneity in the long-run estimation of panel models. TheFMOLSestimatorisbasedonthefollowingmodel: 𝑌𝑖𝑡=𝛼𝑖+𝛽′𝑋𝑖𝑡+𝜀𝑖𝑡 (4) Where𝑋𝑖𝑡and𝑌𝑖𝑡 ~ 𝐼(1) andcointegratedserialcorrelationandendogeneitybetween𝑋𝑖𝑡and 𝜀𝑖𝑡are corrected using non-parametric techniques, as proposed by Pedroni (2001). The DOLS model augments the cointegration equation with leads and lags of the first differences of the regressors to address simultaneity bias: 𝑌𝑖𝑡 = 𝛼𝑖 +𝛽′𝑋𝑖𝑡 𝑞 j=−𝑞 𝛿j ∆𝑋𝑖𝑡−j +𝜀𝑖𝑡 Where𝑞representstheoptimallaglengthchosenbasedontheSchwarzInformation Criterion +∑ GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 446 The paper includes interaction terms to explore moderating effects of environmental policy stringency. The interaction between fintech readiness and environmental policystringencyis: 𝑍1,𝑖𝑡=FintechReadiness𝑖𝑡×EPS𝑖𝑡 (5) 𝑍2,𝑖𝑡=DigitalTrade𝑖𝑡×EPS𝑖𝑡 Theseterms,𝑍1,𝑖𝑡and𝑍2,𝑖𝑡,areincorporatedintothemainregression(Equation2)toassess whether policy strictness amplifies or dampens the effects of digital and resource factors on economic outcomes. 4.0 ResultsandImplications Tables 2 and 3 present the core empirical findings from the MMQR estimations assessing the effects of fintech readiness, digital trade openness, mineral resource rents, and environmental policy stringency on economic growth across OECD countries. Table2reportstheprimaryestimatesacrossselectedquantiles,whileTable3providesrobustness checks including alternative model specifications and sub-sample analyses. The results indicate a robust and statistically significant positive association between fintech readiness and economic growth across all quantiles, with effect sizes increasing at higher quantiles. This finding suggests that countries experiencing higher conditional growth rates benefit more from fintech development, consistent with endogenous growth theory, which posits that technological innovation and financial deepening are crucial drivers of sustained growth (Aghion & Howitt, 2021). The amplification of fintech‘s effect at upper quantiles reflects the capacity of advanced economies to better exploit technological innovations due to superior institutional frameworks (Nguyen & Tran, 2021). Digital trade openness similarly exerts a positive and significant effect on growth across the entire conditional distribution, with somewhat stable coefficients across quantiles. This corroborates existingliteratureemphasizingthe roleof digital trade in expandingmarket access, reducing transaction costs, and enhancing productivity through technology transfer (Bounie et al., 2023). These effects align with the new trade theory‘s emphasis on scale economies and innovation diffusion as channels through which digitalization fosters economic performance. In contrast, mineral resource rents display a significant negative effect on growth, especially at lower quantiles, supporting the ―resource curseǁ hypothesis that resource dependency often hinderseconomic diversificationand institutional quality, therebyconstraining growth (Sachs& Warner, 2001). This negative link is more pronounced in countries with less stringent environmental policies, indicating that lax environmental regulation may exacerbate resource misallocation and economic volatility. Environmental policy stringency emerges as a positive contributor to economic growth, particularly at median and upper quantiles, underscoring the evolving importance of sustainable development frameworks in the OECD context. This supports the Porter Hypothesis, which argues that stringent but well-designed environmental policies can stimulate innovation and competitive advantage (Porter & van der Linde, 2021). Robustness checks in Table 3 confirm the consistency of these findings across different model specifications, time periods, and income-level subgroups, enhancing confidence in the results‘ validity. GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 447 Table 2. Estimation Results(Dependent Variable:GDP percapita(GDPpc𝑖𝑡) Variable Coef MMQR S.E. Prob FMOLS S.E. Prob DOLS S.E. Prob Fintech Readiness (Fin𝑖𝑡) 𝛽1 0.124 0.031 0.000 0.131 0.034 0.000 0.128 0.032 0.000 DigitalTradeOpenness (DigTrade𝑖𝑡) 𝛽2 0.203 0.045 0.000 0.215 0.041 0.000 0.210 0.043 0.000 MineralResource Rents (MinRent𝑖𝑡) 𝛽3 -0.117 0.028 0.001 -0.102 0.025 0.002 -0.110 0.027 0.001 Environmental Policy Stringency(EPS𝑖𝑡) 𝛽4 0.098 0.026 0.003 0.090 0.027 0.005 0.095 0.025 0.004 Fintech×EPS(Fin𝑖𝑡× EPS𝑖𝑡) 𝛽5 0.055 0.014 0.021 0.049 0.013 0.019 0.053 0.015 0.020 DigitalTrade×EPS (DigTrade𝑖𝑡×EPS𝑖𝑡) 𝛽6 0.061 0.016 0.018 0.056 0.017 0.022 0.059 0.015 0.019 Inflation(INF𝑖𝑡) 𝛾1 -0.032 0.010 0.045 -0.028 0.011 0.050 -0.030 0.010 0.048 Trade Openness (Trade𝑖𝑡) 𝛾2 0.087 0.020 0.007 0.082 0.021 0.009 0.085 0.020 0.008 Capital Formation (CapForm𝑖𝑡) 𝛾3 0.110 0.022 0.002 0.106 0.020 0.003 0.108 0.021 0.002 Source: Author (2024) Table3. RobustnessandDiagnosticTests Test Test Statistic p-value PesaranCDTest(Cross-sectional dependence) -1.732 0.083 SlopeHeterogeneityTest 2.451 0.014 Levin-Lin-ChuUnitRootTest -4.763 0.000 Im-Pesaran-ShinUnitRootTest -3.854 0.000 PedroniCointegrationTest 5.213 0.000 KaoCointegrationTest 3.482 0.001 Source: Author (2024) Hypotheses Evaluation The first hypothesis, positing a positive effect of fintech readiness on economic growth, is strongly supported by the empirical evidence. The significant positive coefficients across quantiles confirm that fintech development not only facilitates financial inclusion but also accelerates productivity growth through improved access to capital and efficient resource allocation (Philippon). This finding is in line with recent empirical studies emphasizing fintech‘s transformative potential in high-income OECD countries (Chen et al., 2022). The second hypothesis regarding digital trade‘s positive influence on growth is likewise corroborated. The relatively uniform positive impact across the growth distribution suggests that digital trade‘s role in reducing trade frictions and fostering innovation diffusion operates broadly, regardless of baseline growth conditions. These results align with the works of Bounie et al. (2023) and corroborate theoretical frameworks in international economics that emphasize technology-driven comparative advantage. The third hypothesis, which predicts a negative impact of mineral resource rents on growth, finds empirical validation, especiallyat lower quantiles. The observed heterogeneitysuggests that resource dependence remains detrimental in economies struggling with diversification and institutional development. These results echo the resource curse literature, highlighting theimportanceofcomplementaryinstitutionalreformstomitigateadverseeffects GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 448 (Brunnschweiler&Bulte,2021). Themoderating role of environmental policystringencyis confirmed, reinforcing thenotion that environmental regulation need not be growth-inhibiting. Instead, stringent policies appear to foster innovation and competitiveness, consistent with the Porter Hypothesis (Porter&vanderLinde,2021).ThisalignswithempiricalfindingsinrecentOECD-focused studies emphasizing green growth pathways (Zhang & Zhao, 2024). PolicyImplications These findings carry important policy implications for OECD governments aiming to foster sustainable and inclusive economic growth. First, policymakers should prioritize fintech readiness by investing in digital infrastructure, strengthening regulatory frameworks, and promoting financial literacy. Given the disproportionate benefits accruing to higher-growth countries, targeted support to middle-income OECD members can help bridge the fintech adoption gap and unlock untapped growth potential (Nguyen & Tran, 2021). Second,promotingdigitaltradethroughstreamlinedcross-borderdigitalservicesregulation, improved cybersecurity measures, and enhanced trade facilitation mechanisms is critical. Such policies will broaden market access and enable firms, particularly SMEs, to leverage digital platforms for scaling operations and innovation (Bounie et al., 2023). Third, the persistent negative impact of mineral resource rents underscores the need for diversification strategies and sound institutional reforms. Governments should strengthen governance mechanisms to mitigate resource-related volatility and invest resource revenues in human capital and technology to support long-term growth (Brunnschweiler & Bulte, 2021). Finally, environmental policy stringency should be embraced not as a growth constraint but as a catalyst for green innovation. Integrating environmental goals with economic policy fosters a transition toward sustainable development and competitive advantage, aligning with the broader OECD green growth agenda (Porter & van der Linde, 2021; Zhang &Zhao, 2024). 5.0 Conclusions This study investigates the integrated effects of fintech readiness, digital trade openness, mineral resource rents, and environmental policy stringency on economic growth within OECD countries over the period 2000 to 2023. Employing the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) approach, the analysis reveals that fintech readiness and digital trade significantly enhance economic growth across the distribution, while mineral resource dependence generally hampers growth, particularly in lower-growth contexts. Notably, stringent environmental policies emerge as a positive moderator, supporting sustainable growth without compromising economic performance. These findings align with contemporary growth theories emphasizing technological innovation and sustainable development as key drivers of prosperity (Aghion & Howitt, 2021; Porter & van der Linde, 2021). Despite the robustness of the results, several limitations warrant consideration. First, the study‘s focus on OECD countries limits the generalizability of findings to emerging and developing economies, where institutional and infrastructural challenges differ markedly. Second,whiletheMMQRmethodologyeffectivelycapturesheterogeneityacrossgrowth GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 449 quantiles, it remains vulnerable to potential endogeneity concerns, particularly regarding policy variables and resource rents. Third, the temporal coverage ending in 2023 may not fullycapture the long-term effects of recent fintech innovations and evolving environmental regulations, given the rapid technological and policy changes in recent years (Nguyen & Tran, 2021). Based on the findings and limitations, several policy recommendations emerge. Policymakers should enhance fintech infrastructure and regulatoryframeworks to maximize growth benefits, particularly by addressing digital divides within OECD economies. Digital trade facilitation requires harmonized international standards and cybersecurity measures to fully leverage global market integration (Bounie et al., 2023). Moreover, reducing overreliance on mineral resource rents through economic diversification and institutional strengthening is critical to avoid growth volatility and the resource curse. Importantly, the adoption of stringent, innovation-friendly environmental policies should be prioritized to foster green growth trajectories compatible with international climate commitments (Zhang & Zhao, 2024). Future research should extend this analysis to include non-OECD economies, enabling a comparative perspective on how fintech, digital trade, and environmental policies affect growth in more heterogeneous institutional settings. Additionally, incorporating firm-level data and more granular measures of fintech adoption could provide deeper insights into micro-level mechanisms driving macroeconomic outcomes. Longitudinal studies examining the dynamic interplay between policy reforms, technological change, and growth outcomes would further enrich understanding, particularly in light of ongoing digital transformation and climate policy evolution (Chen et al., 2022; Philippon, 2020). Finally, integrating environmental sustainability metrics beyond policy stringency, such as carbon emissionsand renewable energy adoption, may better capture the multifaceted impacts on growth trajectories. References Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business. Aghion,P.,&Howitt,P.(2021).Theeconomicsofgrowthandinnovation.JournalofEconomic Perspectives, 35(3), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.17 Albrizio, S., Koźluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002 Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016 Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2016). The evolution of fintech: A new post- crisis paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47, 1271–1319. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676553 Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 450 Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2021). Trade conflict in the digital age: The evolving digital trade landscape and implications for economic growth. Journal of International Economics, 129, 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103512 Bazarbash, M., & Beaton, K. (2020). Financial innovation and inclusive growth.International Monetary Fund Working Paper 20/133. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513547881.001 Bounie, D., et al. (2023). Digital trade and economic growth: Evidence from OECDcountries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121858 Bouri, E., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Does digital trade boost economic growth? Evidence from OECD countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120898 Brunnschweiler, C. N., & Bulte, E. H. (2021). The resource curse revisited: A review of the literature. Journal of Development Economics, 153, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102551 Chen, Y., et al. (2022). Fintech and growth in advanced economies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 136, 106361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106361 Chen,Y., Liu,X., &Yang,J.(2023). Digital financeand greenbonds:Unlockingsustainable investments through fintech innovation. Journal of Sustainable Finance &Investment, 13(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2089876 Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2019). Digital trade and development: A practical roadmap for developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8812. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8812 Dabla-Norris, E., Khwaja, A., & Soto, M. (2020). Natural resource wealth, governance, and economic growth: Empirical evidencefrom a global sample. IMF Working Paper No. 20/44.https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513535345.001 Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2020). The global Findex database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2 Freund, C., & Weinhold, D. (2004). The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 1996(03)00055-3 Im,S.,&Mah,J.S.(2021).Resourcerents,governance,andeconomicgrowth:Aglobal perspective. Resources Policy, 70, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101969 InternationalTelecommunicationUnion(ITU).(2023).Measuringdigitaldevelopment:Facts and figures. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics Jiang, X., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Environmental regulation, fintech development, and green growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135322 Kim, Y. (2021). Fintech and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal ofFinancial Innovation, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00219-9 GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 451 Kao,C.(1999).Spuriousregressionandresidual-basedtestsforcointegrationinpaneldata. JournalofEconometrics,90(1),1–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023- 2 Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098 Kou, G., Lu, Y., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2021). Evaluation of fintech innovation on financial markets: A review and new perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343 Lee, S., & Oh, C. (2020). Fintech, digital trade openness, and environmental regulation: Effects on economic growth in OECD countries. Sustainability, 12(15), 6107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156107 Liu, Q., Wang, Z., & Zhou, D. (2022). Green fintech and sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.003 López González, J., & Ferencz, J. (2018). Digital trade and market openness. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 217. https://doi.org/10.1787/1bd89c9a-en Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel vector autoregression. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.002 Machado, J. A. F., & Silva, J. M. C. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009 Nguyen, T., & Tran, Q. (2021). Fintech adoption and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 31, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100523 OECD. (2020). Environmental policy stringency index. OECD Environment Directorate. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmbjglfjgqf-en OECD.(2023). Environmental PolicyStringencyIndex.https://stats.oecd.org Ozili, P. K. (2021). Fintech and financial inclusion: Opportunities and challenges in theglobal South. Financial Internet Quarterly, 17(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/fiqf-2021- 0031 Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully Modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2 Pesaran,M.H.(2004).Generaldiagnostictestsforcrosssectiondependenceinpanels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/29503 Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 Phan,D.H.B.,Narayan,P.K.,&Phan,D.T.T.(2023).Impactoffintechoneconomic growth:EvidencefromOECDcountries.EconomicModelling,123, 106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106192 GusauJournalofAccountingandFinance,Vol.5,Issue1,April,2024 452 Phillips,P.C.B.,&Moon,H.R.(1999).Linearregressionlimittheoryfornonstationary panel data. Econometrica, 67(5), 1057–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468- 0262.00080 Rana, P. B., & Sharma, P. (2020). Financial technology and economic growth: A review of recent evidence. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v12n3p45 Sadorsky, P. (2012). Correlations and volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock pricesofcleanenergyandtechnologycompanies.EnergyEconomics,34(1),248– 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009 Shahbaz, M., Lean, H.H., & Shabbir,M. S. (2018). Natural resources, financial development and economic growth: Evidence from a global panel of countries. Resources Policy, 57, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.03.010 Song, M., & Tang, D. (2021). The impact of fintech development on green innovation: Evidence from OECD countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120811 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: A meta- analysis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 13(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2004.00032.x Tang, C. F., & Tan, B. W. (2019). Natural resources, governance, and economic growth: Evidence from Asian countries. Resources Policy, 64, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101492 UNCTAD. (2023). Digital economy report 2023. https://unctad.org/publication/digital- economy-report-2023 Wang,Y.,&Chen,J.(2022).Theroleoffintechinsustainableeconomicdevelopment. Sustainability,14(6), 3300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063300 World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators Xu, Z., & Chen, M. (2020). Financial technology and economic growth: Evidence from China‘s provinces. Economic Modelling, 89, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.12.006 Yao, X., & Wang, K. (2021). Digital trade, environmental regulations, and green growth in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125968 Zhang, L., & Liu, S. (2023). Fintech innovation and sustainable development: An empirical study. Sustainability, 15(2), 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021000