Hrev_master [Healthcare in Low-resource Settings 2015; 3:4677] [page 31] Typhoid ileal perforation: a 13-year experience Poras Chaudhary, Rajeev Kumar, Chandrakant Munjewar, Utsav Bhadana, Gyan Ranjan, Shailesh Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Mohinder P. Arora Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Dehli, India Abstract Typhoid fever is endemic in many developing countries with a high rate of complications. Aim of this study is to analyse epidemiological fea- tures, clinical presentations, complications and therapeutic outcomes of enteric perforation peritonitis diagnosed and treated in our hospi- tal. Records of total number of 646 patients, who presented with perforation peritonitis due to enteric fever in the surgical emergency unit of Dr Ram Manohar Lohia hospital, New Delhi between January 2001 and December 2013, were reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive sta- tistics was used to analyze the data. Out of 646 patients, 62 (9.59%) presented in shock. Stomal, peristomal, local and systemic complications were high in these patients. Primary closure was done in 212 (33.12) patients, primary ileostomy was created in 410 (64.06) patients, and resec- tion and anastomosis was done in 24 (3.75) patients. Thirteen patients (2.01%) died of typhoid intestinal perforation. To prevent com- plications of typhoid fever, in addition to control sanitation, it is also important to control quack- ery and malpractices. Awareness and education about the disease, its nature and complications will also be of great help. Introduction Enteric fever is a systemic disease caused by Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi and it is characterized by fever, abdominal pain, rel- ative bradycardia with involvement of the lym- phoid tissues. The serotypes A, B and C cause enteric fever and they have no known hosts other than humans.1 The term enteric fever includes both typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. Worldwide, there are an estimated 22 million cases of enteric fever with 200,000 deaths annu- ally.2 Typhoid fever is endemic in India. Reported data for the year 2011 shows 1.06 million cases and 346 deaths the prevalence rate of typhoid in India is 88 cases/lac population and death rate due to typhoid is 0.029/lac population.3 A high incidence of enteric fever correlates with poor sanitation and lack of access to clean drinking water. The enteric fever has high socio-econom- ic impact because survivors may take several months to recover and resume work. Incubation period is usually 10-14 days but the range may be from 3-56 days depending upon the dose of the bacilli ingested.1 Fever is documented at presentation in more than 75% of the cases and abdominal pain is reported in only 30-40%. Serious complications occur in up to 10% of patients which depends on host factors like immunosuppression, antacid therapy and vaccination, and strain virulence and inoculum. Life threatening complications, intestinal perforation (1-3%), gastrointestinal bleeding (10-20%) and circulatory collapse most commonly occur during third week of illness. In treated cases, the fatality rates of enteric fever range from 1-4% and in untreated cases, the fatality rates may rise to 10-20%.1 The most common surgical complication of enteric fever in India is intestinal perforation, which carries a high morbidity and mortality. This is a retrospective study on our experi- ences with enteric perforation peritonitis in the past 13 years. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze epidemiological features, clinical presentations, complications and ther- apeutic outcomes of enteric perforation peri- tonitis diagnosed and treated in our hospital. Materials and Methods Records of a total number of 646 patients, who presented with perforation peritonitis due enteric fever in the surgical emergency unit of Dr Ram Manohar Lohia hospital, New Delhi between January 2001 and December 2013, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with associated malignancy and HIV were excluded from the study. Records of these patients were then reviewed in detail to analyze epidemiological features, clinical presentations, complications and thera- peutic outcomes of enteric perforation peritoni- tis. The parameters including age, gender, socioeconomic status, complete blood count, liver and kidney function test, serum electrolytes at presentation and after surgery, diagnostic pro- cedures, duration of hospital stay, post-operative morbidity, mortality, medical/surgical treatment and socioeconomic impact were evaluated. Blood culture was done in all of these patients which confirmed enteric fever. Descriptive sta- tistics was used to summarize the data. Results There were 435 male and 211 female patients. Their mean age was 29 (range 14-76) (Table 1). Total leucocyte count was found to be high in 598 patients with a mean of 16,500/cu.mm. and less than 4000/cu.mm. in 48 patients only. Renal function tests were deranged in 621 patients and electrolyte imbal- ance was found in 612 patients. Out of these 646 patients 62 presented in shock. Exploratory laparotomy was possible in 56 patients after resuscitation and drain inser- tion and 6 patients died before surgery only due septic shock. Out of these 56 patients, 3 patients died after surgery and out of 584 patients without shock at presentation, 8 patients died after surgery due to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Stomal, peristomal, local and systemic com- plications were high in these patients (Table 2). Primary closure was done in 212 patients, pri- mary ileostomy was created in 410 patients and resection and anastomosis was done in 24 patients (Table 3). Reperforations requiring surgery were observed in 43 patients. These perforations occurred proximal to previous per- foration site in 39 cases while distal to the first perforation in 4 cases. In all of these cases per- foration site was brought out as ileostomy dur- ing first surgery. Discussion Typhoid fever occurs in all parts of the world where water supplies and sanitation are sub- standard. The incidence is highest in south- central and south-east Asia. Though it is easy to diagnose and cure enteric fever, the compli- cation rate is still very high in developing countries including India. Ileal perforation is the most common surgical complication of enteric fever in India.4 One reason is obvious, Healthcare in Low-resource Settings 2015; volume 3:4677 Correspondence: Poras Chaudhary, Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, 189 Deoli Road, 110062 New Dehli, India. Tel.: +91.9891.4473.358. E-mail: drporaschaudhary@yahoo.com Key words: Typhoid fever; Intestinal perforation; High morbidity; Awareness and education. Received for publication: 23 August 2014. Revision received: 6 April 2015. Accepted for publication: 7 April 2015. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (by-nc 3.0). ©Copyright P. Chaudhary et al., 2015 Licensee PAGEPress, Italy Healthcare in Low-resource Settings 2015; 3:4677 doi:10.4081/hls.2015.4677 [page 32] [Healthcare in Low-resource Settings 2015; 3:4677] i.e. sub-standard water supplies and sanita- tion. Other reasons include persistence of quackery in almost every part of the country including metropolitan cities. Typhoid fever is more common in low socioeconomic group, though it occurs in upper and middle class as well, but incidence is comparatively less and complication rate is almost negligible in upper and middle class. This difference of incidence of typhoid fever and its complication is due to the two reasons mentioned previously. People in low socio-economic groups almost always first go to quacks and they misdiagnose and misguide patients, which results in increased complication rates. Out of 646 patients, 412 Article Table 1. Patients’ characteristics. Patients characterictics (n=646) Value Age (year) 29 (range 14-76) Sex (M:F) 435:211 Low socioeconomic status (n) 528 Duration of symptoms before seeking medical advice (days) 9 Patients presented in shock (n) 62 Operative time (min) 50 (range 45-90) ICU care Yes Immediate after surgery 92 Later during post-op period 43 No 511 Patients requiring antibiotics other than IV ceftriaxone (n) 146 Hospital stay (days) 15 Patients presented to quacks initially before coming to government centres (n) 412 Mortality (n) 13 ICU, intensive care unit. Table 2. Complications of typhoid enteric perforation after surgery. Complications Patients (n=633) n % Stomal and peristomal Skin excoriation 408 64.45 High output 53 8.37 Retraction 13 2.05 Prolapse 87 13.74 Parastomal hernia 9 1.42 Systemic Acute renal failure 16 2.52 ARDS 18 2.84 Pneumonitis 76 12.01 Atelectasis 68 10.74 Secondary to primary surgery Anastomotic or primary closure site leak 48 7.58 Intra-abdominal collections 65 10.26 Wound dehiscence Superficial 512 80.88 Deep 84 13.27 Prolonged ileus 92 14.53 Severe electrolyte imbalance 77 12.16 Adhesive intestinal obstruction 32 5.05 Incisional hernia 31 4.89 ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. Table 3. Operative procedures done for typhoid enteric perforation. Type of surgery Patients n % Perforation site brought out as stoma (n=640) 410 64.06 Primary closure (n=640) 212 33.12 Resection and anastomosis (n=640) 24 3.75 Reperforation after stoma creation (n=410) 43 10.48 Resurgery for Leak after primary closure (n=212) 32 15.09 Leak after R&A (n=24) 16 66.66 R&A, resection and anastomosis. [Healthcare in Low-resource Settings 2015; 3:4677] [page 33] (63.77) initially went to quacks for manage- ment of fever for which they received empiri- cal treatment. Patients attend government ter- tiary care centers after complications arise. Government tertiary care centers are very well equipped and provide free services to all the patients. Poor patients who seek early advice during the course of illness in tertiary care centers almost never develop complications like perforation peritonitis and intestinal haemorrhage. Ileal perforation peritonitis is the most com- mon surgical complication encountered in our institute. Six hundred forty six patients pre- sented with perforation of ileum in surgical emergency. The authors have studied only those patients who presented in surgical unit 6, so actual burden of these complications is much more. Out of these 646 patients, 62 pre- sented in shock. Aggressive resuscitation and insertion of abdominal drain before taking up patients for definitive surgery were helpful in saving life. Exploratory laparotomy was possi- ble in 56 patients after resuscitation and drain insertion. Kouame and colleagues5 also recom- mended the importance of aggressive resusci- tation before surgery. Stomal, peristomal and systemic complica- tions are more with enteric perforations as compared to perforation secondary to other causes.4 Wound dehiscence, and post-opera- tive intra-abdominal collections including abscess were the most common complications requiring resurgery. Reperforations requiring surgery were observed in 43 patients. These perforations occurred proximal to previous perforation site in 39 cases while distal to the first perforation in 4 cases. In all of these cases perforation site was brought out as ileostomy during first surgery. During resurgery, new perforation site was then brought out as ileostomy and distal part was resected. Three patients developed perfora- tions after second surgery proximal to previ- ous perforation site and during third surgery stoma was refashioned. Reperforations were possibly due to presence of multiple ulcers resulting in perforation at these ulcer sites. Patients who were not diagnosed properly ini- tially and did not receive any treatment for enteric fever resulted in progression of pathology in the form of multiple ulcers and perforation at different times. Primary closure was done in 212 patients, out of which leak was observed in 32 patients and a stoma was created in these 32 patients during resurgery. Resection and anastomosis was done in 24 patients and leak from anasto- motic site was observed in 16 patients and dur- ing resurgery double barrel ileostomy was cre- ated in 6 patients and in 10 patients, end ileostomy with closure of distal ascending colon loop was done. Zida and colleagues6 rec- ommended creation of ileostomy as primary therapy for ileal perforation peritonitis as it reduces morbidity and mortality while Pal and colleagues7 recommended primary closure and side to side ileotransverse for better results. Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the major complications in these patients. Superficial incisional surgical site infections, involving only skin and subcutaneous tissue, occurred in 512 patients while deep incisional surgical site infections were seen in 84 patients. All the patients who presented in shock in emergency and then underwent sur- gery after resuscitation and broad spectrum antibiotic coverage developed deep incisional SSIs. Out of these 84 patients, 69 underwent resurgery. Surgical site infections are more common in patients with shock because shock results in reduction of local perfusion which enhances susceptibility to infection and a little load of organisms is required to produce infec- tion in presence of shock.8 Fluid and electrolyte imbalance was seen in all the patients and per- sisted for a varying period of length after sur- gery. Fluid and electrolyte imbalance results in inadequate perfusion of gastrointestinal tract and increases chances of SSI. Surgical site infection resulted in impaired mobility, increased hospitalization, delayed rehabilita- tion and incisional hernia. Mortality due to complication of this benign disease was high. Out of 62 patients who pre- sented with shock, 6 died even before surgery. Rest of the 56 patients underwent surgery after aggressive resuscitation and drain inser- tion under local anaesthesia. After surgery, 3 of these patients died due to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Out of 584 patients, 8 died due to septic shock. The total number of deaths in present study was 13 (2.01%), while Mogasale and colleagues9 reported 706 deaths out of 4626 patients. Atamanalp and colleagues10 stressed upon the role of early and appropriate surgical interven- tion to decrease morbidity and mortality. Conclusions To conclude, treatment of cases, contacts and carriers is important to prevent complica- tions. Typhoid fever and its complications are never a major problem where there is clean water supply and very well established modern public health and these are accomplished fact in most of the developed countries. To prevent complications of typhoid fever, in addition to control sanitation, it is also important to con- trol quackery and malpractices. Awareness and education about the disease, its nature and complications, and about the potential hazards of using contaminated food and water will also be of great help. Moreover, vaccines are avail- able for typhoid, though typhoid vaccination is presently not part of the national immuniza- tion programme. Still, vaccination alone can- not control typhoid fever and its complications. This awareness can be spread through nation- al programmes which are still lacking in India. References 1. Ananthnarayanan R, Paniker CKJ. Enterobacteriaceae III: salmonella text- book of medical microbiology. 8th ed. Hyderabad; Universities Press; 2009. pp 288-300. 2. Park K. Epidemiology of communicable diseases. Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine. 21st ed. Bhanot; Jabalpur: 2011. pp 213-6. 3. Government of India. National health pro- file 2011. New Delhi; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: 2012. 4. Chaudhary P, Nabi I, Ranjan G, et al. Prospective analysis of indications and early complications of emergency tempo- rary loop ileostomies for perforation peri- tonitis. Ann Gastroent Hepato 2014;27:1-6. 5. Kouame J, Kouadio L, Turguin HT. Typhoid ileal perforation: surgical experience of 64 cases. Acta Chir Belg 2004;104:445-7. 6. Zida M, Ouedraogo T, Bandre E, et al. Primary ileostomy for typhoid-related ileal perforation: a 62-case series in Ouagadougou, Barkina Faso. Med Trop (Mars) 2010;70:267-8. 7. Pal DK. Evaluation of best surgical proce- dures in typhoid perforation: an experi- ence of 60 cases. Trop Doct 1998;28:16-8. 8. Meakins JL, Masterson BJ. ACS surgery: principles and practice. In: Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkowich GJ, Kaiser LR, Pearce WH, Pemberton JH, Soper NJ, eds. American College of surgeons. New York, NY: WebMD; 2007. p 27. 9. Mogasale V, Desai SN, Mogasale VV, et al. Case fatality rate and length of hospital stay among patients with typhoid intestin- al perforation in developing countries: a systematic literature review. PLoS One 2014;17:e93784. 10. Atamanalp SS, Avdinli B, Ozturk G, et al. Typhoid intestinal perforation: twenty-six year experience. World J Surg 2007;31: 1883-8. Article