Highlights in BioScience ISSN:2682-4043 DOI:10.36462/H.BioSci.202107 Research Article Open Access 1 Department of Pesticides and Toxicology, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan. 2 Blue Nile Natural Institute for Communicable Diseases, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan. Contacts of authors * To whom correspondence should be addressed: yousifassad12@gmail.com Received: September 24, 2020 Accepted: February 7, 2021 Published: March 30, 2021 Citation: Adam EIY , Assad YOHM, Eltohami MME, Bashir NHH, Abdelrahman SH, Nour BYM . Natural Anophelin mosquito repellents and phytochemical analysis of ethanol and hexane leaf extracts from four plant species. 2021 Mar 30;4:bs202107 Copyright: © 2021 Adam et al.. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and supplementary materials. Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Natural Anophelin mosquito repellents and phytochemical analysis of ethanol and hexane leaf extracts from four plant species Emad I. Y. Adam1 >< , Yousif O.H.M. Assad*1 >< , Marwa M. E. Eltohami1 >< , Nabil H.H. Bashir1 >< , Samira H. Abdelrahman2 >< , Bakri Y. M. Nour2 ><  Abstract Currently mosquitoes control is the cornerstone to minimize the rising number of mosquito borne diseases. There is an urgent need looking for alternatives to the current re- liance on synthetic insecticides for the vectors control. Application of active toxic agents from plant extracts as an alternative control strategy was available from ancient times. These are non-toxic, easily available at affordable prices, biodegradable and show broad- spectrum target-specific activities against different species of vectors. Natural products with repellency properties are urgently needed. An insect repellent works by masking human scent, and a number of natural and synthetic mosquito repellents were studied. The main aim of this study was to identify the phytochemicals and compare their poten- tials as mosquito repellents from the ethanol (Et. OH) and hexane (hex) leaf extracts (LEs) of Ocimum basilicum, Coleus forskohlii, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Cymbo- pogon flexuosus under laboratory conditions at 50 and 100% concentrations. Phytochemi- cal analysis showed that alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, terpenes, tannins and terpenoids were present/or absent in the 4 plant-LEs. At 50% concentration of Et. OH extracts, C. forskohlii exhibited higher repellency potential on Anopheles gambiae with protection time of 137.3 min, while O. basilicum, E. camaldulensis and Cy. flexuosus registered pro- tection time of 30.6, 15.3 and 19 min, respectively. At 100% concentration of ethanol- extracts, C. forskohlii caused the highest protection time against the vector with protection time of 182 min. O. basilicum, E. camaldulensis and Cy. flexuosus were equally less po- tent against the insect, with protection time 42.6, 32.6 and 28 min, respectively. Regarding hex-extract, at 50% concentration of C. forskohlii, the highest repellency potential , with protection time of 174 was registered, while O. basilicum, E. camaldulensis and Cy. flexu- osus registered protection times of 44, 18 and 28.6 min, respectively. However, the 100% concentration of Et. OH-extracts of, C. forskohlii and O. basilicum exhibited the highest protection time, with protection times of 228 and 116min, respectively. E. camaldulensis and Cy. flexuosus were less potent, with protection times 28.6 and 54.6 min, respectively. The EOs of C. forskohlii and O. basilicum L EOs proved to have potentials as repellency agents against Anopheles. GC-MS analysis of the extracts identified the compounds of both solvents extracts and the terpens were the major compounds. According to the re- sults, further studies are required, especially on the extracts of basil and coleus since they proved to be effective. Keywords: Mosquito repellent, Anopheles, Essential oils, Sweet Basil, Wild Thyme, Kafure, Lemon Grass Introduction Soonwera and Phasomkusolsil [1] stated that mosquitoes are pestiferous insects to public health; transmit several deadly dangerous diseases, e.g. dengue (DF), filariasis, malaria, yellow fever (YF) and Japanese encephalitis (JE). Several researchers reported that every year at least 500 million people in the world suffer from one of the tropical diseases that include DF, malaria and filariasis [2, 3]. Highlights in BioScience Page 1 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 https://doi.org/10.36462/H.BioSci.202107 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ strongmass2020@gmail.com yousifassad12@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-3051 marwatoxic@gmail.com bashirnabilhh@gmail.com samhamid2002@yhoo.co.uk https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7714-9266 bakrinour@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-4176 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Salih et al., [4] reported mosquitoes are among the most disturbing blood -sucking insects afflicting human beings. The mosquito female's behavior, involving feeding on human blood, is responsible for the transmission of a number of diseases. One to two million deaths is reported annually, due to malaria world- wide. Pest/vector management is facing economic and ecological challenges worldwide, due to human and environmental hazards caused by majority of the synthetic pesticides. Identification of novel effective insecticidal compounds is essential to combat the increasing resistance rates. Botanical pesticides have long been touted as attractive alternatives to synthetic pesticides for pest/vector management, because botanicals reputedly pose lit- tle threat to the environment or to human health. The body of scientific literature documenting bioactivity of plant derivatives to arthropod pests/vectors continues to expand, yet only a hand- ful of botanicals are currently used in agriculture, public health, industrialized world, and there are few prospects for commercial development of new botanical products. The medical vectors control is considered the most impor- tant corner-stone to prevent the diseases; however, the control is either by the synthetic pesticides or the repellents that prevent the biting of the mosquitoes. Personal repellents are substances applied to skin, clothing, or other surfaces to repel or discourage insects and other arthropods, e.g. ticks, from feeding on humans. Repellents help people to avoid bites from mosquitoes, and other biting arthropods that may transmit diseases, and allow people to engage freely in outdoor activities. Insect repellents may also be used to exclude insects from an area [5]. With increasing public concern regarding pesticide safety and problems of insecticide resistance, new safer active ingredi- ents are becoming necessary to replace the existing compounds. Furthermore, the use of repellents in an integrated pest/vector management (IPM/IVM) program has been ignored to a large extent [5]. Salih et al., [4] reported that the personal protec- tion from mosquito bites is currently the most important mea- sures to control mosquito transmitted diseases. The mosquito repellent products commonly available on the market contain N, N-diethyl- 3-toluamide (DEET) as the active ingredient. The synthetic repellents are not safe for human, especially children, because they may cause skin irritation, hot sensation rashes or allergy [6]. Recently, as results of the public health concern on the safety of many synthetic products, many research scientists renewed the interest on the use of natural products from plant origin for mosquito's management [1]. In addition, plant essential oils (EOs), in general, have been recognized as an important natu- ral resource of insect repellents. The plant EOs base repellents according to Soonwera and Phasomkusolsil [1] are effective for mosquito control, and are environment friendly. Vector borne disease such as malaria is a major global health problem; half of the world's populations, mostly the poorest countries living in the tropical world's are at risk of malaria. The disease caused by Plasmodium parasites transmitted by infected female Anopheles mosquitoes bit is serious problem in Africa, where one in every five (20%) childhood deaths is due to malaria. Most malaria cases and deaths are in sub-Saharan Africa Most malaria cases and deaths are in sub-Saharan Africa [7]. Therefore, herbal insect repellents gained importance recently; detailed knowledge concerning them is still lacking. As a re- sult, it is high time to launch extensive search to explore eco- friendly biological/botanical materials for controlling pests. Cur- tis [8] Choochote et al., [9] reported that EOs have been inves- tigated and described as potentially natural sources of insect re- pellents. The effective repellency against female Anopheles re- sults varied with different species of the plant and the concen- tration/dose. According to Trongtokit et al., [10] study on An. stephensi in Brazil using Cymbopogon nardus citronellal 40% EOs was applied topically, reported 100% protection for 7-8 hr. The present study investigated the potential of sweet basil (Oci- mum basilicum L), wild thyme (Coleus forskohlii), Kafure (Eu- calyptus camaldulensis) and, lemon grass (Cymbopogon flexuo- sus), LEs as mosquitoes repellents. Curtis [8] stated in many parts of the world, plant derived nat- ural products have traditionally been used as repellents against insects bites. Particularly essential oils have been investigated and described as potentially natural sources of insect repellents it is time to search for effective alternatives to synthetic repel- lents as reported by Choochote et al., [9]. Many research stud- ies were conducted on various medicinal plants and the effec- tive repellency against female anopheles mosquitoes, the result is varying according to the plant and the concentration. The present study investigates to figure out the effectiveness of Oci- mum basilicum L., Coleus forskohlii, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and, Cymbopogon flexuosus Steud, (leafs) extract as mosquitoes repellent. Materials and Methods Collection of plant material and extraction Fresh leaves of the four above-mentioned plants were col- lected from Gezira State, Sudan. The collected leaves were washed, shade-dried and powdered. The powder was extracted in ethanol (Et. OH) and hexane (hex) by soaking in Et. OH, and clevenger apparatus was used for preparation of hex- extract; 50 g of each plant leaves powder (LP) was extracted separately in conical flasks by Et. OH. Analytical grade Et. OH was added until the LP was fully submerged, thoroughly stirred to ensure proper mixing, and subjected to shaking at regular intervals to allow percolation for 4 days. On the 5th day, the extracts were fil- tered using Whatman No.1 filter paper into another conical flask and the Et. OH was evaporated. The resultant viscous substance was dried and stored in amber-colored vials in a refrigerator at 4oC pending formulation. For hex-extracts the EO was isolated by steam-distillation, using a clevenger apparatus for 6 hr; mois- ture in the oil was removed by anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored at 5oC for further use. Highlights in BioScience Page 2 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Formulation of plant leaves extracts The plant leaves extracts to be tested were formulated in pure fragrance-free Vaseline jelly. The formulations tested were made into two concentrations of 50% and 100%. To make 50% of the formulation, 5g of the pure Vaseline jelly was weighed and transferred to a clean 100 ml beaker, placed in a water bath at 80°C, stirred with a rod up to the melting point. Five g of each of the 8 extracts was then added to the melted jelly, followed by continuous stirring to be completely mixed with the jelly. The resultant 8 formulations of eight plant extracts were stored at 4°C for the bioassay. To make 100% of the formulation, 1 g of pure Vaseline jelly was melted as above; 10 g of each of the 8 ex- tracts were added and treated as above. The two concentrations (50 and 100%) were used in bioassay. Anopheline mosquito The Anopheles gambiae (3-7 days old) was obtained from Blue Nile National Institute for Communicable Disease (BN- NICD) insectary, University of Gezira, colony maintained at 12: 12 LD photoperiod, 70±10% R.H. and 24±2oC. The adult fe- males of Anopheles used for the bioassay before any blood meal. Females were starved for 24 hr and provided with only 10% sugar solution in water. Tests were conducted in triplicate 25 in- dividual of starved adult mosquitoes rearing cage was used and topical treated arm with plant extract exposed to the mosquitoes in the cage to observe the mosquitoes bite. Bioassay test The reared mosquitoes were taken from the insectary of Blue Nile Institute for Communicable Disease (BNICD) (24±2Cº and 80% RH) and the experiment was conducted in the insectary lab of BNICD, the arm cage method was used. Three gram of for- mulated plant leaves extract was applied onto the forearm of a human subject. The treated arm was exposed until the first bite to 25 female mosquitoes, in a (252x3.14x60 cm3) cage, and any mosquitoes landing and biting were counted. After any bite the time was recorded at which the first bites occurred the bioassay terminate and repeated for the other 50 mosquitoes to make trip- licate at successive time intervals. For the negative and positive control, the arm with Vaseline jelly and with DEET was used respectively. Numbers of mosquitoes landing and biting in a minute were recorded. The application of plant extract was used following Frances methods [11]. Two concentrations (50 and 100%) for each plant, ethanol and hexane extract and mixture of ethanol and hexane for each plant to account the number of mosquitoes land and the complete protection time (CPT) in the treated area (20-15cm2), with 3g formulated plant extract. Phytochemical Analysis The phytochemical analysis was carried out at chemistry lab, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira by using the method of Balbaa [12] and Harborne [13] to investigate the presence of the saponins, tannins, sterols, triterpens, flavonoids, terpenoids and alkaloids. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the sample was carried out by using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS-QP2010-ultra) from japans Simadzu company, with the serial number 020525101565SA and capillary column (Rtx-5ms- 30m[2E3?]0.25mn[2E3?]0.25μm).The sample was injected by using split mode, Helium as A carrier gas passed with flow rate 1.61 ml/min, the temperature program was started from 60c with rate 10oC/min to 300oC as a final temperature degree with 5min- utes hold time, the injection port temperature was 300oC as the ion source temperature was 200oC and the interface temperature was 250oC. The sample was analyzed by using scan mode in the range of m/z 40-500 charges to ratio and the total run time was 29 minutes. Identification of the components for the sample was achieved by comparing their retention index and mass frag- mentation patents with those available in the library, the national institute of the standards and technology (NIST). Data Analysis For each plant species, the number of mosquitoes landed on the arm was counted at different time intervals and the Percent- age Repellency (PR) per each plants leaf extract/solvent/concentration was determined using the following equation (1) according to Teklani and Perera [14] as follows: PR = N IU − N IT 25 (IS ) 100 (1) Where: • PR=Percentage repellency. • NIU=Number of individual in the untreated group. • NIT=Number of individual in the treated group. • IS=Number of insects used. At least triplicates were carried out for all the plants leaves extracts for selected extracts concentration with significant mosquito repellent activity. Results Phytochemical analysis Phytochemical analysis of ethanolic and hexane extracts of the four plants leaves were carried out to identify the presence of Alkaloid, Tannin, Saponin, Terpenoids, Flavonoids and ter- pens. In this study four plant species (Basil, Wild Thyme, Ka- fure and Lemon Grass) belonging to different families were col- lected. Most of these plants were reported to treat a variety of diseases in traditional medicine system. Ethanol Extracts The preliminary phytochemical screening had shown the pres- ence of Alkaloid, Tannin, Flavonoids, Saponin and Terpens in the leaves extracts the summary of the results are presented in Table 1. The Alkaloid, Tannins, saponin and Terpens were de- tected in the Basil leaves extract; Alkaloid, Tannins, and Terpens in Wild Thyme leaves extract; Alkaloid, Tannins, Flavonoids and saponins in Kafure leaf extract and Alkaloid,Tannins, and saponins in Lemongrass, Highlights in BioScience Page 3 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Table 1. The phytochemical constituents (PC)of ethanol (E) and hexane (H) leaf extracts from the studied four plants. PC Oc Col Eu Cy E H E H E H E H Alkaloid + + + - + + + + Tannins + + + - + + + + Flavonoids - - - - + + - - saponins + - - - + + + + Terpens + - + + - - - - Oc=Ocimum, Col=Coleus, Eu=Eucalyptus, Cy= Cymbopogon. (+)= Presence, (-) = Absence Hexane extract The preliminary phytochemical screening had shown the pres- ence of Alkaloid, Tannin, Flavonoids, Saponin and Terpens in the hexane leaves extracts the summary of the results are pre- sented in Table 1. In Basil leaves extract Alkaloid, Tannins was only detected. While in Wild Thyme leaves extract terpens only was detected. In Kafure leaves extract Alkaloid, Tannins, Flavonoids and Saponins were detected and Terpens is absent. In Lemongrass extract Alkaloid, Tannins, and Saponins were de- tected. Bioassay The results of bioassay were collected as a complete protec- tion time (CPT), and the number of mosquitoes landing for the concentrations (50 and 100%), ethanol, hexane and hexane plus ethanol extract. Ethanol extracts presented in Tables 2 and 3 shows that Wild Thyme 50% and 100% were recorded the high- est protection time 137.3 and 182 min respectively compare to the other plant extracts, with percent repellency 92 and 89% re- spectively. For the hexane extracts presented in Tables 4 and 5 prove that Thyme 50% and 100% were recorded the highest protection time 124 and 228 min respectively compare to the other plant extracts, with percent repellency 90 and 92% respec- tively. Regarding the combination of the two extracts presented in Tables 6 and 7 also the Wild Thyme 50% and 100% were recorded the highest protection time 182 and 215 min respec- tively compare to the other plant extracts except Basil in 50% recorded higher protection time (86 min), with percent repel- lency 84 and 88% respectively. By the way the selected four leaf plant extracts offers protection against An. arabiensis adult female mosquitoes but varied in terms of repellency up to 228 minutes of exposure periods recorded by Wild Thyme. Chemical constituents detected in Kafure leaf extracts Table 8 shows the chemical constituent of Kafure leaves etha- nol and hexane extracts; their concentrations, peak area, retention time and chemical group of each compound. A total of 13 compounds detected in ethanol and hexane extract which represent 63.63% and 68.54% for ethanol and hexane extract, respectively. Eucalyptol was the main compounds (33.11% and 26.93%), respectively. Table 9 shows the chemical constituent of Kafure leaf's ethanol extract; their concentrations, peak area, retention time and chemical group of each compound. A total of 20 compounds detected in ethanol extract and represent 36.37% of the total of the extract. Globulol 9.94% and Squalene 8.10% were the main compounds. Table 10 shows the chemical con- stituent detected in Kafure leaf's hexane extract; their concen- trations, peak area, retention time and chemical group of each compound. A total of 25 compounds detected in hexane extract, as follows, where Globulol was the main compound (18.06%). Discussion The synthetic chemicals used to control insects leads to sev- eral documented environment and human health hazards. An alternatives method suggested using natural products that pos- sess good efficacious results and environmental friendly. Among those alternative methods the use of essential oils from plants belonging to several plant species subjected intensive studies which provide successful results against field crop pests and pub- lic health pests and disease vectors control, including mosquitoes (Anopheles, Culex and Aedes). These EOs were extensively tested by several scientists for their repellent properties as valu- able natural resources and to elucidate their chemical and physi- cal properties, in addition to their modes and sites of action, for- mulation, toxicological profiles, side-effects, etc... Today medi- cal vector management has to face environmental and economic costs. Table 2. Spatial repellent activity of 50% and 100% evaluated plants leaves ethanol extract against Anopheles mosquito based on the number of landed mosquitoes (NLM) and protection time per minute (PT). Treatment 50% 100% NLM PT NLM PT 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean Control 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - DEET 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 Wild Thyme 1 2 1 1.3 113 122 177 137.3 2 3 1 2 210 154 182 182 Sweet Basil 2 3 1 2 25 36 31 30.6 4 2 6 4 42 31 45 42.6 Kafure 4 2 1 2.3 15 10 21 15.3 2 3 4 3 25 32 41 32.6 Lemongrass 2 3 5 3.3 15 17 25 19 4 2 3 3 31 25 28 28 Table 3. Percent repellency (PR) of 50% and 100% of evaluated plants leaves ethanol extract against Anopheles mosquito based on the number of landed mosquitoes (NLM). Treatment 50% 100% NLM PR NLM PR 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean Control 25 24 24 24.33 - 25 24 24 24.33 - DEET 8 9 5 7.33 68% 8 9 5 7.33 68% Wild Thyme 1 2 1 1.3 92% 2 3 1 2 89% Sweet Basil 2 3 1 2 89% 4 2 6 4 81% Kafure 4 2 1 2.3 88% 2 3 4 3 85% Lemongrass 2 3 5 3.3 84% 4 2 3 3 85% Highlights in BioScience Page 4 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Table 4. Spatial repellent activity of 50% and 100% evaluated plants leaves hexane extract against Anopheles mosquito based on the number of landed mosquitoes (NLM) and protection time per minute (PT). Treatment 50% 100% NLM PT NLM PT 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean Control 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - DEET 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 Wild Thyme 1 2 2 1.6 191 142 189 174 1 2 1 1.3 230 208 246 228 Sweet Basil 3 2 5 3.3 46 36 50 44 2 1 3 2 90 118 140 116 Kafure 4 6 8 6 18 21 15 18 3 1 2 2 36 21 28 28.3 Lemongrass 3 4 6 4.3 22 36 28 28.6 2 3 5 3.3 59 41 63 54.3 Table 5. Percent repellency according to the number of landed mosquitoes (NLM) of 50% and 100% percent of evaluated plants leaves hexane extract against Anopheles mosquito. Treatment 50% 100% NLM PR NLM PR 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean Untreatedcontrol 25 24 24 24.33 - 25 24 24 24.33 - DEET 8 9 5 7.33 68% 8 9 5 7.33 68% WildThyme 1 2 2 1.6 90% 1 2 1 1.3 92% SweetBasil 3 2 5 3.3 84% 2 1 3 2 89% Kafure 4 6 8 6 73% 3 1 2 2 89% Lemongrass 3 4 6 4.3 80% 2 3 5 3.3 84% Table 6. Spatial repellent activity and protection time per minute (PT)of 50 and 100% of evaluated plants leaves hexane and ethanol extract mixture against Anopheles mosquito. Treatment 50% 100% NLM PT NLM PT 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean Control 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - 25 24 24 24.33 - - - - DEET 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 8 9 5 7.33 72 91 121 94.66 Wild Thyme 2 3 5 3.3 164 194 190 182.6 4 2 1 2.3 211 233 201 215 Sweet Basil 4 1 3 2.6 48 51 31 43.3 2 6 4 4 66 94 101 87 Kafure 4 6 7 5.6 17 11 19 15.6 6 5 8 6.3 20 15 23 19.3 Lemongrass 6 3 4 4.3 15 24 19 19.3 1 2 4 3.3 27 20 31 26 Table 7. Percent repellency (PR) according to the number of landed mosquitoes (NLM) of 50% and 100% of evaluated plant leaves hexane and ethanol extracts mixture against Anopheles mosquito. Treatment 50% 100% NLM PR NLM PR 1st 2nd 3rd mean 1st 2nd 3rd mean DEET 8 9 5 7.33 68% 8 9 5 7.33 68% Wild Thyme 2 3 5 3.3 84% 4 2 1 2.3 88% Sweet Basil 4 1 3 2.6 86% 2 6 4 4 81% Kafure 4 6 7 5.6 74% 6 5 8 6.3 72% Lemongrass 6 3 4 4.3 80% 1 2 4 3.3 84% The Synthetic repellents DEET and pyrethroids containing formulations commonly sold in markets and insecticides sales vender. The side effects of these two chemical groups was re- ported by several research scientists, accordingly plant-based re- pellents not only minimize the use of synthetic chemicals and economic cost and save huge amount of money spent on syn- thetic compounds, also protects the environment, health of users. The plants screened for phytochemical analysis seemed to have the potential to act as a source of useful chemicals and also to improve and help in the health status of the people exposed to mosquito's bits (Table 1). This study justifies the use of plant species in medicinal field to protects human from mosquito's bits and hence minimize the malaria spreading. There are different plants which have Mosquito repellent activity and this activity affected with species the environment and other factors. And the chemical constituent of these show different results on the mosquito repellent. The different plant extract contains differ- ent chemical constituent shows different results on the mosquito repellent activities (Tables 2-7). This study investigated the mosquito spatial repellent effi- Highlights in BioScience Page 5 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species cacy of the basil, wild thyme, kafure and lemongrass, (ethanol, hexane and mixture of both ethanol extract and hexane extract). The present study results provided information and observations on the repellency activity of tested four plant species LEs against Anopheles mosquitoes. Mosquitoes usually make surreptitious landings on exposed skin to feed this why most people wearing protective clothing stands as a good measure of preventing them from vector contact. Application of these plants LEs prevented landing attempts and bites by mosquitoes; this verifies already documented evidence that some plants LE is a potent mosquito repellent. Sweet basil O. basilicum EOs are materials that are traditionally used in Sudan the mosquitoes by burning leafs and flowers. How- ever, Coker et al., [15] stated that certain characteristics, e.g. volatility, limited its effectiveness. Active ingredients, e.g. ter- penes (2◦ metabolites) and oil components are responsible for the repellency activity. For a plants material to be valuable as a mosquito repellent it must effectively prevent insect bites on the treated area for several hours, and it must work in different envi- ronmental conductions, should be environmental- friendly when applied to human skin, it must acceptable and having a pleasant odor, it should also be harmless to clothing, it should have a rel- atively low cost and effective against other biting insects such as flies. Basil leaves extract provide different spatial repellency against mosquitoes with different concentration, in ethanol, hex- ane and mixture of ethanol and hexane extract (Tables 2, 4 and 6). Ethanol extract provided 30.6 and 42.6 min 32 and 45% for 50% and 100% ethanol extract respectively and the hexane extract was provided 44 and 116 min and evaluated with 46% and 122% for 50% and 100% respectively when compared with DEET, while the mixture of ethanol and hexane extract shows that basil was provides the protection time in both (50% and 100%) was 43 min and 87 min respectively and this repellency act as 45% and 91.9% when compared with standard mosquito repellent DEET (94.6 min protection time) respectively (Tables 3, 5 and 7). Basil hexane leaves extract provide the highest repel- lency against mosquitoes (116 min), Baba et al., [16] conclude that hexane basil leaves extract provided 183 min and 303 min CPT from concentration 50% and 100% respectively (Tables 4 and 6). In this study; the presence of ethanol extract in the mix- ture was reduced the repellency of mixture from the 116 to 87 min in 100% concentration; so the tannin and alkaloids may re- sponsible for the repellent activity in hexane extract according to the phytochemical analysis (Table 1). The phytochemical anal- ysis was preceded an Alkaloids, Tannins, saponins and terpens were found in the Ethanol Extract, While Alkaloid and Tannins only detected in Hexane extract.. Wild thyme Ethanol extract, the wild thyme was provides the highest pro- tection time in both (50 and 100) %137.3 min and 182 min re- spectively when compared with other plant ethanol extract, and repellency at 154% and 192%, respectively when compared with standard mosquito repellent-DEET (94.6 min protection time). Active movement away from treated arm within minute of appli- cation was observed in wild thyme, and this strong repellent ac- tivity may caused by terpens group which appear in ethanol and hexane extract (according to phytochemical analysis) as main compounds and thymol (monoterpenoid) was highest concentra- tion (54.96% and 57.42%) in ethanol and hexane extract respec- tively according to GC-MS analysis, and this was confirm by the study done by Pandey et al., [17] they prove the activity of thy- mol that repel An. stephensi adults at the dose of 25.0 mg/mat after 1 h duration, while same degree of repellency was obtained by the oil at the dose of 55.0 mg/mat, which indicating thymol has double activity than the essential oil obtained from seeds of Trachyspermum ammi (Linn.). In present study beside the alka- loids and tannins present in ethanol extract only (phytochemical analysis), the hexane extract of the wild thyme is provides the highest protection time in both (50 and 100) % 174 min and 228 min respectively when compared with other plant leaves ex- tracts and this highest CPT and repellency as 183% and 241% respectively, when compared with standard mosquito repellent- DEET (94.6 min CPT). Regarding the mixture of ethanol and hexane extract of each of the tested plants, wild thyme is pro- vides the highest protection time in both (50 and 100%) 182.3 min and 215 min with spatial repellency at 193% and 227% re- spectively, compared to DEET. The main compounds detected in ethanol and hexane extract was thymol which shows consid- erable anti-feedant activities against insects in many studies con- ducted by Gonzalo et al., [18] and Won et al., [19] shows that the wild thyme essential oil was rich source monoterpenes, includ- ing thymol, p-cymene, carvacrol, linalool, and o-terpinene, were assessed to determine their repellent activities to the mosquitoes. o-Terpinene had a potent spatial repellent activity with a protec- tion rate of essential oil topical treatment while the carvacrol and thymol showed an equivalent level of repellency. The Wild thyme was the best one compared with the rest plants it was provided highest CPT; in both ethanol and hexane extract. How- ever, the hexane 100% was provided the protection until 228 min, this period even longer than DEET (2.4 times). According to phytochemical analysis the spatial repellency of Wild thyme could be rise from terpens mainly because the hexane extract shows the terpens only. although provided the highest CPT and the ethanol extract which contain terpens beside the alkaloids and tannins show low CPT. Our study show that thymol and eu- calyptol (monoterpenoid) was main compounds in either ethanol and hexane extract and its concentration was corresponding with spatial repellency period, the repellency of plant extract could be due to the eucalyptol and this was proved by James et al., [20] they found that mosquito feeding and ovipositional repel- lency due to the presence of major monoterpenoid in the chem- ical volatile oil (i.e., 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) identified in plant extract of Hemizonia fitchii (Asteraceae). Phytochemicals are the principal active components that are Highlights in BioScience Page 6 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Table 8. Chemical constituent detected appear in the GC-Mass chromatogram in both ethanol and hexane extract of Kafure leaf’s and area percentage of peaks. ID Name Area% Ethanol Area% Hexane 1. Alpha-Pinene 3.38 6.77 2. D-Limonene 0.19 0.55 3. Eucalyptol 33.11 26.93 4. Gamma.-Terpinene 0.30 0.47 5. Pinocarvone 1.06 1.94 6. 2-Oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-6-ol, 1,3,3-trimethyl-, acetate 0.25 0.37 7. Bicyclo(3.1.1)heptane-2,3-diol, 2,6,6-trimethyl- 0.18 0.24 8. Copaene 0.19 0.42 9. Alloaromadendrene 0.39 0.26 10. Caryophyllene 0.76 0.92 11. Aromandendrene 7.02 7.07 12. Alpha.-Guaiene 1.60 2.37 13. 2-Naphthalenemethanol, decahydro-.alpha.,.alpha.,4a-trimethyl-8-methylene-, [2R-(2.alpha.,4a.alpha.,8a.beta.)] 15.20 20.23 Table 9. Chemical constituent detected appear in the GC-Mass chromatogram in ethanol extract of Kafure leaves and area percentage of peaks. ID Name Peak Area(%) 1. alpha-Phellandrene 0.79 2. p-Cymene 1.78 3. 3-Methyl-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride 0.20 4. Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)- 0.67 5. Isoledene 0.11 6. 1-Tridecene 0.12 7. Bicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene, 1,2,3,6-tetramethyl- 0.15 8. Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1.alpha.,2.beta.,4.beta.)]- 0.04 9. Naphthalene, decahydro-4a-methyl-1-methylene-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [4aR-(4a.alpha.,7.alpha.,8a.beta.)]- 0.18 10. 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene, 1a,2,3,5,6,7,7a,7b-octahydro-1,1,7,7a-tetramethyl-, [1aR-(1a.alpha.,7.alpha.,7a.alpha.,7b.alpha.)- 0.21 11. (S)-(-)-4-Isopropenyl-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid 1.98 12. Azulene, 1,2,3,3a,4,5,6,7-octahydro-1,4-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1.alpha.,3a.beta.,4.alpha.,7.beta.)]- 1.42 13. Guaia-1(10),11-diene 1.37 14. 7-epi-cis-sesquisabinene hydrate 0.79 15. Globulol 9.94 16. Phytol, acetate 3.03 17. 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol 0.55 18. 9-Eicosyne 1.04 19. n-Hexadecanoic acid 3.90 20. Squalene 8.10 believed to exhibit the medicinal activity of the plants and pos- sibly the repellent activity of the oils. According to Banthorpe [21] and Heinrich et al., [22] terpenoids could be responsible for the flavor of fruits, the fragrance of the flowers and the quality of agricultural products. Therefore Coker et al., [15] prove that the presence of terpens is speculated to be associated with fragrance material and spatial repellent activity of oils. Kafure Kafure leaves extract provided different CPT by (50% and 100%) concentration, in ethanol; hexane and ethanol and hexane extract (mixture) (Tables 2, 4 and 6). Ethanol extract provide 15 min and 32 min by 50% and 100% concentration respectively. However the hexane extract provide 18 min and 28 min com- plete protection by 50% and 100% concentration respectively when the mixture provided 15 min and 19 min complete pro- tection by 50% and 100% concentration respectively. The result shows that hexane extract was slightly stronger repellent than the ethanol and the mixture; the phytochemical analysis shows the presence of the: saponins, tannins, and alkaloids and absence of triterpens in both ethanol and hexane extract; while the GC-MS detected some of monoterpenes like euclyptol, (Cyclic) 33.11% and 26.93% and 2-Naphthalenemethanol, decahydro-alpha, al- pha, 4a-trimethyl-8-methylene-, [2R-(2alpha, 4aalpha, 8abeta )]- 15.20% and 20.23%, in ethanol and hexane extract respectively, and Globulol was 9.94% in ethanol extract and hexane extract was contained (-)-Globulol 18.06% so this variety may respon- Highlights in BioScience Page 7 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species Table 10. Chemical constituents detected appear in the GC-Mass chromatogram in hexane extract of Kafure leaves and area percentage of peaks. ID Name Peak Area(%) 1. Camphene 0.14 2. Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 4-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)- 0.07 3. beta-Pinene 0.22 4. beta-Myrcene 0.06 5. o-Cymene 3.58 6. Doconexent 0.20 7. Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester 0.28 8. alpha-Campholenal 0.14 9. Terpinen-4-ol 1.58 10. L-.alpha.-Terpineol 1.67 11. Ethanone, 1-(6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-en-2-yl)- 0.19 12. 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)- 0.08 13. Citral 0.15 14. 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene, 1a,2,3,5,6,7,7a,7b-octahydro-1,1,7,7a-tetramethyl-, [1aR-(1a.alpha.,7.alpha.,7a.alpha.,7b.alpha.) 0.20 15. 12-Oxatetracyclo[4.3.1.1(2,5).1(4,10)]dodecane, 11-isopropylidene- 0.17 16. Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-4a,8-dimethyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [2R-(2.alpha.,4a.alpha.,8a.beta.)]- 1.38 17. beta-Humulene 0.31 18. 2H-3,9a-Methano-1-benzoxepin, octahydro-2,2,5a,9-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3.alpha.,5a.alpha.,9.alpha.,9a.alpha.)]- 0.22 19. gamma-Muurolene 0.21 20. Aromadendrene, dehydro- 0.20 21. 2-Oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-6-ol, 1,3,3-trimethyl- 0.26 22. 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-4-ol, decahydro-1,1,4,7-tetramethyl-, [1aR-(1a.alpha.,4.beta.,4a.beta.,7.alpha.,7a.beta.,7b.alpha.)]- 1.32 23. (-)-Globulol 18.06 24. Caryophyllene 0.47 25. 1H-Benzocycloheptene, 2,4a,5,6,7,8,9,9a-octahydro-3,5,5-trimethyl-9-methylene-, (4aS-cis)- 0.27 sible of different repellency and the 32 min was highest CPT achieved by kafure ethanol extract. In the study conducted by Fathelrahman [23] showed ethanol extract 10% concentration provide 17% repellency for 60min. the result was correspond- ing with this study that increasing extract concentration of ka- fure was increase the repellency in both extract and the kafure extract, although was weak in spatial repellency. According to the result of GC-MS analysis of the chemical compound of kafure leaves extract of the current study (Tables 8, 9 and 10); the results were corresponding with the GC-MS analysis of essential oil yield and composition in Eucalyptus species in Montenegro coastline by Slavenko, et al; [24] show the presence of α-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene, α-phellandrene, α-terpinene, p-Cymene, Eucalyptol γ-terpinene, terpinene-4-ol, α-terpineol, aromadendrene, alloaromadendrene, also was found in this study. According to the GC-MS analysis of the present study prove the presence of o-Cymene 3.58%, Terpinen-4-ol 1.58%, L-.alpha.- Terpineol1.67%, Naphthalene, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 8a-octahydro- 4a, 8-dimethyl-2-(1-methylethenyl), L-alpha -Terpineol 1.67% [2R-(2.alpha.,4a.alpha.,8a.beta.)]-1.38%, 1H-Cycloprop[e] azu- len-4-ol,decahydro-1,1,4,7-tetramethyl,[1a R (1a alpha, 4beta, 4a beta, 7alpha, 7a beta, 7b alpha)]-1.32%, (-)-Globulol 18.06%, 2-Naph- thalenemethanol, decahydro -alpha, alpha, 4a-trimethyl -8-methy- lene-,[2R-(2alpha,4a alpha, 8a beta)]- 20.23%, was found in the hexane leaves extract and not found in ethanol ex- tract, and alpha-Pinene was 6.77% in hexane extract and 3.38% in ethanol extract. Lemongrass Application of Cymbopogon oil prevented landing attempts and bites by mosquitoes; and this verifies already documented evidence by Baldacchino et al., [25] and Prabhakar et al., [26] that Cy. Citrates extract is a potent mosquito repellent. However, the interval of protection is a matter of concern; in this study, lemon grass leaf extracts provided protection from mosquito for 3 hours after which landing attempts and bites were experienced. This observation corroborates previous records of plants essen- tial oils by Bhupen et al., [27]. According to Bhupen et al., [27] has demonstrated the essen- tial oils from a variety of plant species been used as insect repel- lents; such as Cymbopogon. In the present study Lemongrass leaves extract provided different CPT with different concentra- tion (50% and 100%) in ethanol, hexane and ethanol and hexane extract (mixture). Ethanol extract provided 19 min and 28 min by 50% and 100% concentration respectively (Tables 2 and 4). However the hexane extract provide 28 min and 54 min com- plete protection by 50% and 100% concentration respectively (Table 6). While the mixture provided 19 min and 26 min com- plete protection by 50% and 100% concentration respectively. Highlights in BioScience Page 8 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species The 54 min was maximum CPT provided by lemon grass (hex- ane extract) with spatial repellency is equal 57% compared with DEET, and also was low when compared with wild thyme and basil extract. In phytochemical studies both ethanol and hexane extract was showed the Alkaloid, tannins and saponins while the terpens and flavonoids were absent and those groups were impor- tant as insect repellent. Although monoterpenes was detected by the GC-MS as main compounds as 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl- , (Z)-in ethanol extract and 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)- and 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)- in hexane extract. In the study conducted by Vinutha et al., (28) on essential oil yield from aerial part of Cymbopogon flexuosus; Myrcenol, Linalool, Trans-chrysanthemal, 3,6,6-Trimethyl -cyclohex-2-enol, Citronel- lal, (-)-Isopinocampheol, 1-Pentanol, 5-cyclopropylidene-3- un- decyne, 3-carvomenthenone, (Z)-linalool oxide, (furanoid), Neral, Geranial, β-Vatirenene, Citronellol, Dextro-carvone, Cycloiso- longifolene, Trans-(-)-Carveol, cis-Carveol, Nerol, Oxiranmethan- ol, 3-methyl-3(4-mathyl-3-pentenyl), Bicyclopentylone, Geranic acid, Geranyl acetate, most of those compounds were detected in lemongrass extract in this study. According to the result, undiluted hexane leaves extract ( 100% ) provide maximum CPT according to the follows: 228 min wild thyme, 116 min basil, 54 min Lemongrass and 28 min kafure, thus the hexane extract was seem more stronger in repel- lency than the ethanolic extracts, and the Coleus is the best and effective as mosquitoes repellent than other plants, followed by Basil and Lemon grass and kafure. The results of the current work indicated that the spatial re- pellent potential of the leaves extract oils is concentration depen- dent. However it is observed that all the thyme leaves extract oils indicated protection of at least 2.5 h at 50% concentration and 2.5-5 h protection at 100%. Accordingly the use of plants leaves extract essential oil in prevent mosquito bite is expected to re- duce the cost and environmental effects of mosquito repellents. According to Annamaria et al., [29] showed volatile com- pounds detected in Bixa orellana samples the major volatile com- pound present in seed extracts proved to be source of repellent activity (mainly of sesquiterpenes, monoterpenes, arenes and as α-humulene). These volatile compound found in most of our chemical analysis to the four plants which reflects the repellent activity of the test extract especially thyme. In conclusion the preliminary findings of this laboratory evaluation bioassay of the repellent potential of the essential oils of Ocimum basilicum L., Coleus forskohlii, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and, Cymbo- pogon flexuosus Steud, leaves extracts have confirmed their tra- ditional use as a broad mosquito repellent agent. Further investi- gations leading to identification of the lead compounds exhibit- ing the repellent activity is recommended. This would enhance a robust development of plant based oil for protection against mosquito bite. Basil provided considerable repellency against Mosquitoes. Wild thyme was most effective which provided 105 min CPT evaluated with 205% in compare to the control (DEET, lavender). The examined plants will be useful if the further studies have been conducted and it will replace the commercial mosquitoes repellent (DEET, lavender). Terpenoids were found in most of the extracts, but in the C. forskohli with the highest concentration. The presence of the (+)-4-carene, benzene, 1- methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-, 2-naphthalenemethanol, decahydro- were related with hex- extracts of C. forskohli only, and it has strong repellency activity. Acknowledgements We appreciate the assistance from Blue Nile Institute for communicable diseases for providing the mosquitoes for the stud- ies. We thank Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research- Commission of Scientific Research and Innovation in supporting the research fund and thanks to all colleagues helping in a way or another to let this work done. References 1. Soonwera M, Phasomkusolsil S. Mosquito repellent from Thai essential oils against dengue fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti (L.)) and filarial mosquito vector (Culex quinquefasciatus(Say)). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014; Vol. 8(17), pp. 1819- 1824. 2. Madhumathy AP, Aivazi AA, Vijayan VA. Larvicidal efficacy of Capsicum annum against Anopheles stephensi and Culex quin- quefasciatus. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007; 44: 223-226. 3. Kumar SV, Mani P, John BTMM, Ravi KG. Mosquito larvici- dal, oviposition deterrent and repellent properties of Acalypha indica L. extracts against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus. International Journal Medicine Bio- science. 2012; No 1: 33-41 4. Salih AOA, Salih MM, Ali MM. Bioassay of Herbal Mosquito Repellent Formulated from the Essential Oil of Ocimum Basilicum. American Journal of Applied Chemistry. 2018; Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 132-141. 5. Peterson C, Coats J. Insect repellents- past, present and future, review the history of insect repellents from the 1920s down to re- cent work on plant-derived repellents. Pesticide Outlook .2001; 154-158pp. 6. Das NG, Baruah I, Talukdar PK, Das SC. Evaluation of botan- icals as repellents against mosquitoes. Journal of Vector Borne Disease. 2003;40: 49-53. 7. Pronczuk J, Bruné MN, Gore F. Children's Environmental Health in Developing Countries. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Hea- lth. Jerome O. Nriagu, ed. 2011, Pp. 601–610. 8. Curtis CF. Personal protection methods against vectors of dis- ease. Rev Med Vet Entomol, 1992; 80: 543-553. 9. Choochote W, Chaithong U, Kamsuk K, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangk- osal P, Tuetun B, Champakaew D, Pitasawat B. Repellent activ- ity of selected essential oils against, Aedes aegypti. Fitoterapia. Fitoterapia. 2007; 78:359-364. 10. Trongtokit Y, Curtis CF, Rongsriyam Y. Efficacy of repellent products against caged and free flying Anopheles stephensi mosqu- itoes. Southeast Asian J Trop. Med Public Health, 2005; 36:1423- 1431. Highlights in BioScience Page 9 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Adam et al., 2021 Natural Anophelin mosquito repellent analysis of leaf extracts of four plant species 11. Frances SP, Klein TA, Hildebrandt DW, Burge R, Noigamol C, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Wirtz RA. Laboratory and field eval- uation of deet, CIC-4 and AI3-3722O against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. J Med Entomol. 1996; 33:511- 515. 12. Balbaa AY, Zaki AY, Shamy AM. Qualitative and quantitative study of the flavonoid content of the different organs of Sophora japonica at different stages of development. Planta Med. 1974; 25: 325–330. 13. Harborne AJ. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Tech- niques of Plant Analysis. 3rd ed. Springer Netherlands; 1998. 14. Teklani PWNN, Perera BGK. Mosquito Repellent and Larvici- dal Activities of Acalypha Indica Leaf Extracts. Int. J Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017; 1(2): 107. 15. Coker HB, Chukwuanim CM, Ifudu ND, Aina BA. The Malaria Scourge, Concepts in Disease Management. Nig. J. Pharm. 2000; 32: 19-47. 16. Baba G, Lawal AO, Shariff HB. Mosquito repellent activity and phytochemical characterization of essential oils from Striga her- monthica, Hyptis spicigera and Ocimum basilicum leaf extracts. British Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2012 Apr 25; 3(2) :43-8.. 17. Pandey SK, Shikha U, Tripathi AK. Insecticidal and repellent ac- tivities of thymol from the essential oil of Trachyspermum ammi (Linn) Sprague seeds against Anopheles stephensi. Parasitol Res. 2009; 105(2):507-512. 18. Gonzalo Ortiz de Elguea-Culebras; Raúl Sánchez-Vioque; María Isabel Berruga; David Herraiz-Peñalver and Omar Santana-Méridas. Antifeedant effects of common terpenes from Mediterranean aro- matic plants on Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Journal of Soil Sci- ence and Plant Nutrition. 2017; 17 (2), 475-485. 19. Won-Sik C, Byeoung-Soo P, Sae-Kwang K, Sung-Eun L. Repel- lent activities of essential oils and monoterpenes against culex pipiens pallens, Journal of the American M osquito Control As- sociation. 2002;Vol.18, No.(4):348-351. 20. James AK, Mark VD, Manuel FB. 1,8-Cineole (Eucalyptol), a mosquito feeding and ovipositional repellent from volatile oil of Hemizonia fitchii (Asteraceae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1987(13), pp:2131–2141. 21. Banthorpe DV. Classification of Terpenoids and General Proce- dures for their Characterization. In: Charlwood, B.V. and D.V. Banthorpe, (Eds.), Methods in Plant Biochemistry. Terpenoids. Academic, London, 1991; 7: 1-41. 22. Heinrich M, Pieroni A, Bremner P. "Medicinal Plants and Phy- tomedicines" In: The Cultural History of Plants. Taylor and Francis, New York, Routledge, 2005;pp: 205-238. 23. Fathelrahman IE. Effect of organic extracts of Cafure leaves (Eu- calyptus camaldulensis Dehn.) on mosquitoes (Anopheles arabi- ensis Patton.)Gezira Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011; Vol., 9 No2. 24. Slavenko G, Dejan O, Maria C, Emilija J, Dušan B, Kristina B, Neda MD. Variation of essential oil composition of Eucalyp- tus Camaldulensis (Myrtaceae) from the Montengero Coastline, BIBLID: 1450-7188 (2010) 41, 151-158. 25. Baldacchino F, Tramut C, Salem A, Lienard E, Deletre E, Franc M, Martin T, Duvallet G, Jay-Robert P. The repellency of Lemon- grass oil against stable flies tested using video tracking, Parasite, 2013; 20:21. 26. Prabhakar K, Kinnera K, Priya KK, Peele KA. Investigation of the repellence activity of Bio-out, A natural mosquito repellent. International Journal of Life Sciences, Biotechnology and Pharma Research. 2013; 2:3. 27. Bhupen K, Somi B, Sharma AK. Plant essential oils as mosquito repellent: A Review. International Journal of Research and De- velopment in Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2013; 3(1): 741-747. 28. Vinutha M, Suchetha M. and K. J. Thara Saraswathi. Effect of different a biotic stress on essential oil yield from aerial part of Cymbopogon flexuosus (NEES EX STEUD) WATS. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2016; 4(12), 1490-1504. 29. Annamaria G, Pietro De M, Giuseppe G, Luca MC, Sara P. Sec- ondary Metabolite Profile, Antioxidant Capacity, and Mosquito Repellent Activity of Bixa orellana from Brazilian Amazon Re- gion, Journal of Chemistry Volume 2013; /Article ID 409826/ 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/409826. Highlights in BioScience Page 10 of 10 March 2021|Volume 4 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/409826 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Collection of plant material and extraction Formulation of plant leaves extracts Anopheline mosquito Bioassay test Phytochemical Analysis Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry Data Analysis Results Phytochemical analysis Ethanol Extracts Hexane extract Bioassay Chemical constituents detected in Kafure leaf extracts Discussion Sweet basil Wild thyme Kafure Lemongrass Acknowledgements References