Highlights in BioScience ISSN:2682-4043 DOI:10.36462/H.BioSci.202204 Perspectives Open Access 1 Independent Researcher, Pharmaceutical Re- search Facility, Cairo, Egypt. 2 National Centre for Radiation Research and Technology, Cairo, Egypt. 3 Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, United King- dom. * To whom correspondence should be ad- dressed: mostafaessameissa@yahoo.com Editor: Hatem Zayed, College of Health and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. Reviewer(s): Alsamman M. Alsamman, African Genome Center, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University,Morocco.. Morad M. Mokhtar, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt. Received: March 31, 2022 Accepted: May 1, 2022 Published: August 24, 2022 Citation: Eissa ME , Rashed ER , Eissa DE. Implementation of the Pareto principle in focus group generation based on global coronavirus disease morbidity and mortality rates. 2022 Aug 24;5:bs202204 Copyright: © 2022 Eissa et al.. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and supplementary materials. Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Implementation of the Pareto principle in focus group generation based on global coronavirus disease morbidity and mortality rates Mostafa Essam Eissa*1 ><, Engy Refaat Rashed2 >< Dalia Essam Eissa3 ><  Abstract The recent pandemic that has hit the world has affected humanity in all aspects of life. Since the outbreak of this worldwide epidemic, a huge amount of data has been generated. In this article, we have provided a new simplified insight into the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID -19) using the Pareto principle to highlight the main contributors to morbidity and mortality. A time series database of confirmed cumulative cases and deaths for all countries was processed from the Humanitarian Data Exchange website provided by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. More than 85% of the incidents recorded worldwide were from the AMRO, EURO, and SEARO WHO regions, and the United States, Russia, and India were found to account for the largest proportion of cases and deaths in these affected areas. The application of Pareto analysis is useful in finding focus groups for further study and modeling. Keywords: COVID-19, Morbidity, Mortality, Pareto principle, WHO Introduction The new coronavirus disease (COVID -19), which has been causing a worldwide pandemic for about two years, has affected every aspect of human life, and the world has changed significantly since then [1]. A large amount of data has been compiled showing morbidity and mortality rates as cumulative numbers of cases and deaths on a daily basis for each affected country and/or area [2]. The database was processed based on the World Health Organization classification (WHO) and then subdivided according to the daily records of the political region. Implementation of the Pareto principle on big data of COVID-19 morbidities and mortalities Before assessing the distribution of COVID -19 deaths and morbidities, a brief look at the distri- bution of the world population based on the census should be taken to find a match with the reported cases and deaths according to the 60/40 and 80/20 rule using Minitab version 17.0.1. This software was implemented as it has been used in other research. [3-6]. The Asian population accounts for about 60% of the world population, followed by Africa and Europe (Figure 1A ) with a cumulative total of over 85% of the world population. However, the COVID -19 cases and deaths show a dif- ferent descending order, with the American regional office (AMRO) zone ranking first, followed by the European regional office (EURO) and the Southeastern regional office (SEARO) with 0.40, 0.32, and 0.17 cases and 0.48, 0.30, and 0.12 deaths, respectively, as a proportion of the world population (Figure 1B and 1C ). Contribution of countries by cumulative cases and deaths in WHO regions An examination of contributing countries and/or areas with cumulative COVID -19 mortality and morbidity rates based on the WHO classification revealed that few regions are particularly af- fected. The main contributing countries in the AMRO region were, in descending order of cases, the United States of America (USA), Brazil, Argentina, and Colombia, with a cumulative share of more than 80%. For deaths, the same order was maintained for the first two countries, followed by Mexico and Pero with a cumulative contribution of about 82% [7]. Highlights in BioScience Page 1 of 4 August 2022|Volume 5 https://doi.org/10.36462/H.BioSci.202204 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ mostafaessameissa@yahoo.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-5935 engyrefaat@yahoo.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-378X daliaessameissa@yahoo.co.uk https://orcid.org/0000-00002-6340-8973 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Eissa et al., 2022 Implementation of the Pareto principle to global coronavirus disease rates Both the USA and Brazil had a cumulative contribution of more than 50% of the total number of people affected in the AMRO region, as shown in Figure 2A and 2B . Another area WHO - which made a relatively small contribution - was stud- ied. The West Pacific Regional Office (WPRO) showed that the Philippines accounted for about one-third of the cumulative daily morbidity and mortality rates. However, the order var- ied for the other nations that followed, as Japan and Malaysia showed an alternating order in cases and deaths. Interestingly, the most populous country in the world, from which the first epi- demic cases originated that triggered the global outbreak, con- tributed only marginally (≈ 11% in deaths and fourth in cumula- tive rate) because of rapid and rigorous government and public health interventions [8]. A detailed visualization of the sequence of records is shown in Fig. 3 Figure 2C and 2D . Figure 1. Pareto chart showing major continents in population census (A) and WHO main contributors in morbidities (B) and mortalities (C). A look at a third important region, SEARO, showed that In- dia had the highest number of deaths and morbidities at daily rates in the WHO region. This is evident in Figure 2E and 2F with a proportion of over 70%. Adding Indonesia and India to the cumulative deaths gives a proportion of about 0.90 from the SEARO region. Another marginally affected WHO area, the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO), showed a different pattern, where only the first country was strongly af- fected by COVID -19, followed by a group of seven and six Figure 2. Pareto chart showing major countries in mortalities and morbidities from COVID-19 from AMRO (A and B), WPRO (C and D) and SEARO ( E and F), respectively. countries showing relatively small variations among them. For the cumulative case rate, the descending order was the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Morocco, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon, with con- tribution factors of approximately 0.32, 0.13, 0.09, 0.06, 0.06, 0.05, 0.05, and 0.04, respectively (Figure 3). For the cumu- lative mortality rate, the descending order was Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia with percent- age contributions of 42.1, 9.7, 8.8, 7.1, 6.7, 4.8, and 3.9%, re- spectively (Figure 3A and 3B). Data from the African Regional Office (AFRO) - which is also a minority - show similar be- havior to EMRO, but with a greater contrast between the first country affected and the other nations that follow, as shown in Figure 3C and 3D. Moreover, the reported cumulative cases show a broader range of joint contributions. South Africa alone accounted for approximately 50% and 60% of the total cumula- tive cases and deaths, respectively. In terms of morbidity and mortality for the remaining countries, the order was as follows: Ethiopia (6.0%), Kenya (4.2%), Nigeria (4.1%), Algeria (3.0 %), Zambia (3.6%), Ghana (2.5%), Mozambique (2.1%), Botswana Highlights in BioScience Page 2 of 4 August 2022|Volume 5 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Eissa et al., 2022 Implementation of the Pareto principle to global coronavirus disease rates (2.1%), Namibia (1.8%) and Zimbabwe (1.8%) and Algeria (4.4 %), Ethiopia (4.0%), Kenya (3.3%), Zimbabwe (2.4%), Nigeria (2.3%) and Zambia (2.1%), respectively. EURO Lands showed a unique pattern in Figure 3E and 3F . While this region was considered one of the three main zones affected by daily death and disease rates from COVID -19, much less variation was shown with broader contributing countries, resulting in an ob- servable low declining ramp in the Pareto diagram. Thus, 15 and 12 nations shared the top contributing countries (80%) in morbidity and mortality data, respectively. The first two coun- tries (the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom (UK)) ac- counted for only about one-fifth and one-quarter, respectively, of the cumulative cases and deaths in the data set. The descend- ing list of remaining countries in the third and fourth morbid- ity categories included France (with about the same contribution as the United Kingdom), Turkey, Spain, Italy, Germany, Poland, Ukraine, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Belgium, and Ro- mania, with contribution ratios of 0.10, 0.09, 0.07, 0.07, 0.06, 0.04, 0.04, 0.03, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively. The descending order of the remaining nations for the fourth three cumulative deaths was as follows: Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Poland, Turkey, Ukraine, and Romania, with proportions of 0.11, 0.09, 0.08, 0.07, 0.05, 0.04, 0.04, and 0.03, respectively. Figure 3. Pareto chart showing major countries in mortalities and morbidities from COVID-19 from EMRO (A and B), AFRO (C and D) , EURO (E and F). Findings and limitations The previously analyzed report is time-bound, as updating the dataset with new inputs may show some discrepancies [9, 10]. In particular, the distribution of COVID -19 across the globe seemed to be independent of the climatic nature of the regions, as seen in Figure 4 , and showed a wide geographic dispersion within different temperature and humidity ranges. Nevertheless, Table 1 showed that countries near the equator had a higher pro- portion of daily cumulative morbidity and mortality rates than those farther away, where AMRO and SEARO countries had about 45% and 43% of cumulative morbidity and mortality rates, respectively. Figure 4. Political map showing the distribution of more than 60% of morbidi- ties and mortalities around the globe. Since other researchers have concluded that hot and humid climates can halt the spread of the disease to some degree, this suggests that other factors played a greater role in these polit- ical regions, including but not limited to public health policy and agency actions, public perception and awareness of outbreak control measures, general health status of citizens, racial factors, extent and rate of vaccination, and population size and density, in addition to political and economic conditions [11- 14]. An- other important factor that should not be underestimated con- cerns the government and public health officials, as well as the routine system for recording, monitoring, and tracking affected individuals, as this could affect the reliability and quality of the derived databases. Highlights in BioScience Page 3 of 4 August 2022|Volume 5 http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Eissa et al., 2022 Implementation of the Pareto principle to global coronavirus disease rates Table 1. Major countries in the global distribution of morbidities and mortalities cases by WHO regions. WHO Region A Regional Cumulative * Rate Contribution (%) Morbidity Country Cases Contribution (%) * Mortality Country Death Contribution (%) * Cases Deaths AMRO B 40.1 48.2 USA 19.93 USA 16.39 Brazil 9.38 Brazil 11.86 Argentina 2.13 Mexico 6.15 SEARO C 16.8 11.6 India 13.73 India 8.41 EURO D 31.8 30.0 Russia 3.50 Russia 3.90 UK 3.18 UK 3.60 France 3.18 Italy 3.30 Turkey 2.86 France 2.70 Spain 2.23 Spain 2.40 Italy 2.23 Germany 2.10 A World Health Organization , B American Regional Office, C Southeast Asia Regional Office, D European Regional Office, * Based on cumulative daily record. Conclusion In the world of Big Data, it will be useful to analyze a large amount of information quickly, easily and effectively to derive a useful conclusion. From the cumulative daily cases and deaths in the coronavirus pandemic database, a focus study group could be identified using Pareto analysis. These segregated countries will be subjected to further quantitative study using a modeling approach for morbidity and mortality that could serve as the ba- sis for further outbreak investigations. Abbreviations AFRO: African Regional Office AMRO: American Regional Office COVID-19: Coronavirus disease of 2019 EMRO: Eastern Mediterranean Region EURO: European Regional Office SEARO: Southeast Asia Regional Office WHO: World Health Organization WPRO: West Pacific Regional Office References 1. Keshky E, El Sayed M, Basyouni SS, Al Sabban AM. Getting through COVID-19: The pandemics impact on the psychology of sustainability, quality of life, and the global economyA sys- tematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020:3188. 2. OCHA Services. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases Data [Internet]. HUMANITARIAN DATA EXCHANGE. 2022 [cited 30 March 2022]. Available from: https://data.humdata.org/dataset /novel -coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases 3. Eissa M. Avian schistosomes impact on public health: a long- term disease observation. Annals of Medical Research. 2019;(0):1- 2. 4. ESSA M, RASHED E. Inventory Digital Management Using Statistical Process Control Analysis in Healthcare Industry. Jour- nal of Business in The Digital Age. 2020;3(2):123-8. 5. Whitehead A. 60/40 Is The New Neutral Pareto Ratio [Inter- net]. SeekingAlpha. 2022 [cited 30 March 2022]. Available from: https://seekingalpha.com/article/ 4198408-60-40-is-new- neutral-pareto-ratio 6. Mitra A. Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. John Wiley & Sons; 2016 May 2. 7. Pan American Health Organization /World Health Organization. Epidemiological Update: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 27 September 2021, Washington, D.C.: PAHO/WHO; 2021 8. Yu X, Li N, Dong Y. Observation on Chinas Strategies to Prevent the Resurgence of the COVID-19 Epidemic. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2021;14:2011. 9. AlTakarli NS. Chinas response to the COVID-19 outbreak: A model for epidemic preparedness and management. Dubai Med- ical Journal. 2020;3(2):44-9. 10. An agency of the European Union. COVID-19 situation update worldwide, as of week 11 updated 24 March 2022 [Internet]. Eu- ropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2022 [cited 31 March 2022]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/ geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases 11. Mecenas P, Bastos RT, Vallinoto AC, Normando D. Effects of temperature and humidity on the spread of COVID-19: A sys- tematic review. PLoS one. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0238339. 12. Bukhari Q, Jameel Y. Will coronavirus pandemic diminish by summer?. Available at SSRN 3556998. 2020 Mar 17. 13. Ma Y, Pei S, Shaman J, Dubrow R, Chen K. Role of meteoro- logical factors in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States. Nature Communications. 2021 Jun 14;12(1):1-9. 14. Ganegoda NC, Wijaya KP, Amadi M, Erandi KK, Aldila D. Inter- relationship between daily COVID-19 cases and average temper- ature as well as relative humidity in Germany. Scientific reports. 2021 May 28;11(1):1-6. Highlights in BioScience Page 4 of 4 August 2022|Volume 5 https://data.humdata.org/dataset/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases https://data.humdata.org/dataset/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases https://seekingalpha.com/article/4198408-60-40-is-new-neutral-pareto-ratio https://seekingalpha.com/article/4198408-60-40-is-new-neutral-pareto-ratio https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases http://bioscience.highlightsin.org/ Abstract Introduction Implementation of the Pareto principle on big data of COVID-19 morbidities and mortalities Contribution of countries by cumulative cases and deaths in WHO regions Findings and limitations Conclusion Abbreviations References