




































Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal  

Vol. 19 (1), February 2022, 67-78 
ISSN:  2598-6368(online); 1693-7236(print)                                                                                                                     
  

         humanitas@psy.uad.ac.id                                                                                                                        http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v19i1.11 

Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: 

Identification processes as a mediator 

Ciptari Dhienda Aurellya, Darmawan Muttaqin  

Faculty of Psychology, University of Surabaya, Indonesia 
Corresponding Author: darmawan.muttaqin@staff.ubaya.ac.id 
 

 

Introduction 

Identity formation is a central psychosocial developmental task during adolescence and 

continues throughout life (Branje, de Moor, Spitzer, & Becht, 2021). Furthermore, Erikson 

stated the dynamics of identity formation as described by identity achievement and identity 

confusion (Montgomery, 2020). Identity achievement occurs when adolescents determine 

what they are, how they are, and the goals they want to achieve. Individuals who achieve a 

coherent identity tend to have positive psychosocial development such as having a positive 

self-concept (Morsünbül, Crocetti, Cok, & Meeus, 2016), meaningful life (Schwartz et al., 

2015), life satisfaction (Morsünbül, 2013; Piotrowski, 2018; Ritchie et al., 2013; Sugimura 

et al., 2015), and tend to engage in helping behavior (Crocetti, Benish-Weisman, & 

McDonald, 2020; Nelson & Padilla-Walker, 2013). On the contrary, identity confusion 

occurs when adolescents cannot determine goals and commitment to various identity choices 

considered the basis of individual adult identity (Montgomery, 2020). Individuals who 

experience identity confusion show psychosocial developmental deviations such as 

ART ICLE  INFO  

 

AB ST R ACT  

 

Article history 

Received January 11, 2022 

Revised February 16, 2022 

Accepted February 21, 2022 

 Identity formation is an adolescent developmental task that continues 

throughout life. Its process cannot be separated from the role of the 

significant person for adolescents, including siblings. Therefore, this 

study aims to examine the identification process (modeling and de-

identification) as a mediator in the relationship between sibling 

relationships in identity formations commitment, in-depth exploration, 

and reconsideration of commitment.  Four hundred adolescents aged 12-

21 years participated in this study. The Indonesian version of the Utrecht-

Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS), the Sibling 

Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ), and the Sibling Influence Scale (SIS) 

were used to measure identity formation, sibling relationship quality, and 

identification process. Data analysis was performed using regression 

analysis and the Sobel test. The results showed that the identification 

process could be a mediator between the quality of sibling relationships 

and identity formation. Also, the differences in quality among siblings 

lead adolescents to take different paths of the identification process, 

modeling, or de-identification, which impact the process of identity 

formation differences.  Adolescents involved in modeling can learn and 

imitate older siblings to achieve an optimal identity. On the other hand, 

adolescents involved in de-identification find it more difficult and 

experience more challenges in achieving an optimal identity.    

 

 
Keywords 

adolescents; 

identification process; 

identity formation; 

quality of sibling relationships; 

siblings. 

 

 

mailto:humanitas@psy.uad.ac.id
http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v19i1.11
mailto:darmawan.muttaqin@staff.ubaya.ac.id


68   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

experiencing anxiety (Crocetti et al., 2015; Michikyan, 2020; Morsünbül et al., 2016), 

depression (Waterman et al., 2013; Weisskirch, 2019), and tend to engage in unlawful 

behavior (Crocetti et al., 2020; Schwartz et al., 2015). 

The concept of adolescent identity formation has undergone development. Several 

theoretical models have been proposed to understand the process of adolescent identity 

formation (Schwartz, Zamboanga, Luyckx, Meca, & Ritchie, 2013). In the last decade, 

Crocetti, Rubini, & Meeus (2008)  developed a three-dimensional model of identity that 

includes commitment, in-depth exploration, and reconsideration of commitment. In addition, 

Crocetti (2018) explained that initially, adolescents have an identity commitment that comes 

from their parents, which later they explored in-depth by seeking relevant information 

related to identity choices. The results lead adolescents to experience satisfaction or 

dissatisfaction with their identity commitments. Therefore, when adolescents feel 

dissatisfaction with their previous identity commitments, they improve or choose a more 

satisfying identity choice. 

A previous study on identity formation in Indonesia discovered that its process could 

not be separated from the significant role of other people as it relates to adolescents 

(Muttaqin, 2020). This study result indicates that parents, friends, boyfriends, and girlfriends 

play a substantial role for adolescents during the process of identity formation (Kindelberger, 

Mallet, & Galharret, 2020; Ominyi, Adepeju, & Matthew, 2019; Trost, Eichas, Ferrer-

Wreder, & Galanti, 2020). Nevertheless, parents play a significant role in adolescent identity 

formation, specifically while approaching the early stage (Crocetti & Meeus, 2014). 

Moreover, in the family, intra-generational interactions also occur between siblings and 

intergenerational interactions between parents and children (Kenny & Cook, 2020). 

The study on the role of siblings in identity formation is limited compared to the 

parents. Presently, only two studies stated the role of a sibling in identity formation (Crocetti, 

Branje, Rubini, Koot, & Meeus, 2016; Wong, Branje, VanderValk, Hawk, & Meeus, 2010). 

Whereas siblings also have a role in adolescent development, specifically when they act as 

friends and even best friends, trustworthy people, and role models (Howe, Persram, & 

Bergeron, 2020). In addition, siblings also provide emotional support, acceptance, intimacy, 

and warmth (Wikle, Jensen, & Hoagland, 2018). Therefore, it is not surprising that siblings' 

presence helps adolescents achieve optimal self-adjustment and emotions such as having 

self-concept, self-esteem, autonomy, and establishing warm relationships with friends and 

other people (Gungordu & Hernandez-Reif, 2020; Smorti & Ponti, 2018). Their presence 

also has a positive impact on adolescents on academic performance and career development 

(Aguirre & Matta, 2021; Gurantz, Hurwitz, & Smith, 2020; Nicoletti & Rabe, 2019; Rogers, 

Guyer, Nishina, & Conger, 2018; Vleuten, Weesie, & Maas, 2020). 

Adolescents with siblings, specifically elderly ones, are more likely to have a model 

in behavior. Older siblings can serve as role models and sources of emotional support (Howe 

et al., 2020; Hughes, McHarg, & White, 2018). Without exception, their presence serves as 

role models and sources of support when performing the process of identity formation (Ruiz, 

2012). However, the older siblings act as models to the younger ones when there is a positive 

sibling relationship and have certain competencies (Whiteman, McHale, & Soli, 2011). This 

condition is based on attachment theory, which prioritizes emotional attachment as a 

manifestation of positive sibling relationships (Fraley & Tancredy, 2012), allowing the 

younger siblings to ask questions, exchange ideas, and win insights from older siblings in 

identity formation. On the other hand, when siblings do not have positive relationships, 

misunderstandings and poor communication will occur, making them difficult to form their 

identity (Buist, Deković, & Prinzie, 2013). 



Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal 69 

 

          Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator)  

The relationship between sibling relations and identity formation may not be direct 

because the younger siblings identify the older sibling first (Killoren, Alfaro, & Kline, 2016). 

Wong et al. (2010) discovered that adolescents achieve optimal identity formation by 

modeling older siblings. This modeling is based on social learning, allowing siblings to 

observe and learn from each other (Howe et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2018). The modeling 

process directs younger siblings to learn and imitate the behaviors displayed by older siblings 

(Whiteman, Bernard, & McHale, 2010). This process leads them to explore various identity 

options and determine commitments that the older sibling represents. 

In contrast, Alfred Adler described the process of de-identification, which refers to the 

tendency for siblings to define themselves differently from one another (Vleuten et al., 2020; 

Whiteman et al., 2010). Younger siblings involved in de-identification aim to protect 

themselves from social comparisons with older siblings and as an effort to show their 

uniqueness than older siblings (Killoren et al., 2016; Whiteman, McHale, & Crouter, 2007). 

This condition leads the younger sibling to explore different identity options with the older 

sibling. In addition, younger siblings may have difficulty determining identity commitment 

due to the absence of examples and direction from older siblings. In this situation, this study 

focuses on younger siblings based on the theory and previous study, which states that an 

older sibling has a more significant influence on a younger sibling than otherwise. 

Previous studies discovered that sibling relationships' quality is related to identity 

formation (Crocetti et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2010). However, the latest study conducted by 

Killoren et al. (2016) discovered that quality sibling relationships direct younger siblings 

through the modeling process compared to the de-identification of older siblings. This 

finding shows different mechanisms in the relationship between sibling and identity 

formation mediated by the identification process. Therefore, this study aims to examine the 

identification process, namely modeling and de-identification as mediators in the 

relationship between sibling relations and identity formation, including commitment, in-

depth exploration, and reconsideration of commitment. 

Method 

Participants 

Participants in this study consisted of 400 adolescents aged 12-21 years (M = 19.67 SD = 

2.463) who had at least one older sibling with a maximum age gap of 4 years. Furthermore, 

they consisted of 106 (26.50%) and 294 (73.50%) adolescent boys and girls, respectively. 

Participants were 45, 107, and 248, which indicates (11.25%) early, (26.75%) middle, and 

(62.00%) late adolescents, respectively. Also, data were collected using convenience 

sampling techniques by contacting participants directly and disseminating information on 

social media such as Twitter, Instagram, Line, and WhatsApp. Participants willing to be 

involved in the study are asked to fill out an informed consent and study questionnaire, 

presented online through a google form. 

Measures 

Identity Formation 

The Indonesian version of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-

MICS; Muttaqin, 2017) consists of 26 items used to assess identity formation. Also, it 

consists of three subscales such as commitment (10 items, for example, "My education 

makes me feel sure of myself"), in-depth exploration (10 items, for example, "I make a lot 

of effort to keep finding out new things about my best friend"), and reconsideration of 



70   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

commitment (6 items, for example, "In fact, I'm looking for a different education"). The U-

MICS response uses five options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). In 

this study, U-MICS has a reliability coefficient of .857 (CITC = .253 - .644) for the 

commitment subscale, .689 (CITC = .227 - .512) for the in-depth exploration sub-scale, and 

.781 (CITC = .406 - .571) for the reconsideration of commitment subscale. 

Quality of Sibling Relationships 

The warmth/closeness subscale of the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ; Furman & 

Buhrmester, 1985) consists of 27 items used to assess the quality of sibling relationships. 

Furthermore, it uses seven behavioral indicators of sibling closeness: prosocial behavior, 

intimacy, companionship, similarity, attention, admiration of the sibling, and affection. 

Sample of items, for example, "How much do you and this sibling tell each other things you 

don't want other people to know?" and "How much is there a strong feeling of affection 

(love) between you and this sibling?"). Responses to the warmth/closeness subscale of SRQ 

use five response options ranging from 1 (hardly at all) to 5 (extremely much). SRQ was 

adapted to Indonesian using forward-back translation following guidelines from 

International Test Commission (2017). In this study, the warmth/closeness subscale of the 

SRQ has a reliability coefficient of .960 (CITC = .403 - .750). 

Identification Process 

The Sibling Influence Scale (SIS; Whiteman, Bernard, & McHale, 2010) consists of 18 items 

used to assess their identification process. Furthermore, it consists of two sub-scales such as 

modeling (8 items, for example, "From watching my sister/brother, I have learned how to do 

things") and de-identification (10 items, for example, "I try to be different from my 

sister/brother"). The SIS response uses five options ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). 

SIS was adapted to Indonesian by involving two translators from English to Indonesian, two 

reviewers, and two translators from Indonesian to English. The adaptation process follows 

the guidelines of the International Test Commission (2017). In this study, SIS has a 

reliability coefficient of .910 (CITC = .551 - .810) and .872 (CITC = .294 - .763) for the 

modeling and de-identification subscale, respectively. 

Data Analysis 

Data analysis was performed through the IBM SPSS version 25 program to test the study 

hypothesis, namely the role of modeling and de-identification as mediators in the 

relationship between the quality of sibling relationships and identity formation. The mediator 

analysis was conducted using the approach of Baron and Kenny (1986) by performing 

regression analysis, which includes: (1) the quality of the sibling relationship to 

modeling/de-identification (path a), (2) the quality of the sibling relationship (path c') and 

modeling/de-identification (path b) to commitment/in-depth exploration/reconsideration of 

commitment, and (3) the quality of the sibling relationship to commitment/in-depth 

exploration/reconsideration of commitment (path c). In addition, the Sobel test (Sobel, 1982) 

was conducted to determine the direct and indirect role of the quality of sibling relationships. 

Modeling/de-identification is stated to play a mediator role in the relationship between the 

quality of sibling relationships with commitment/in-depth exploration/reconsideration of 

commitment when the indirect significance role is less than .05. 



Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal 71 

 

          Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator)  

Results 

Table 1 shows the results of regression analysis which discovered that the quality of the 

relationship with siblings predicts the identification process of both modeling (R2 = .636, ß 

= .798, p < .001) and de-identification (R2 = .045, ß = -.212, p < .001). Modeling also predicts 

the adolescent identity formation on the dimensions of commitment (R2 = .147, ß = .185, p 

< .05) and in-depth exploration (R2 = .142, ß = .178, p < .05). However, modeling fails to 

predict the adolescent identity formation on the reconsideration of commitment dimension 

(R2 = .047, ß = .059, p > .05). De-identification predicts the formation of adolescent identity 

on the dimensions of commitment (R2 = -.036, ß = .174, p < .001), in-depth exploration (R2 

= -.054, ß = .256, p < .001), and reconsideration of commitment (R2 = -.072, ß = .338, p < 

.001). In addition, the results of regression analysis also show that the quality of sibling 

relationships can predict commitment (R2 = .052, ß = .185, p < .001), in-depth exploration 

(R2 = .079, ß = .282, p < .001), and reconsideration of commitment (R2 = .012, ß = -.108, p 

< .05). Figure 1 shows the relationship between sibling relationship and each dimensions of 

identity formation with identification process as mediator.  
 

Table 1  

Regression Analysis the Quality of Sibling Relationships, the Identification Process, and 

Identity Formation 
Variable R2 ß B S.E. t p 

SR => Modeling (path a) -.636 -.798 -.963 .519 26.378 .001 

SR => De-identification (path a) -.045 -.212 -.222 .730 -4.336 .001 

Modeling => Commitment (path b) -.147 -.185 -.125 .563 -2.295 .022 

Modeling => In-depth exploration (path b) -.014 -.178 -.110 .508 -2.250 .001 

Modeling => Reconsideration (path b) -.047 -.059 -.053 .859 --.709 .479 

De-identification => Commitment (path b) -.036 -.174 -.135 .558 -3.533 .001 

De-identification => In-depth exploration (path b) -.054 -.256 -.182 .493 -5.376 .001 

De-identification => Reconsideration (path b) -.072 --.338 -.391 .811 -7.013 .001 

SR => Commitment (path c) -.052 -.227 -.185 .040 4.651 .001 

SR => In-depth exploration (path c) -.079 -.282 -.210 .036 5.861 .001 

SR => Reconsideration of commitment (path c) -.012 -.108 -.131 .060 -2.165 .031 

Note S.R. = Sibling relationship 

 

 

Figure 1. Regression analysis the quality of sibling relationships, the identification process, and identity 

formation 

Note SR = Sibling relationship, Mod = Modeling, DI = De-identification, Com = Commitment, Exp = In-depth 

exploration, Rec = Reconsideration of commitment 



72   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

The direct effect of the quality of sibling relationships is reported in Table 2. The 

quality of sibling relationships cannot directly predict the three dimensions of adolescent 

identity formation, namely commitment (direct effect = .065, t = .990, p > .05), in-depth 

exploration (direct effect = .059, t = 1.759, p > .05), and reconsideration of commitment 

(direct effect = -.187, t = -1.870, p > .05) when controlling for modeling. However, the results 

of the Sobel test (Table 2) discovered that modeling acts as a mediator in the relationship 

between the quality of sibling relationships and identity formation on the dimensions of 

commitment (indirect effect = .120, z = 2.285, p < .05) and in-depth exploration (indirect 

effect = .106, z = 2.240, p < .05). On the other hand, when de-identification is controlled, the 

quality of sibling relationships has a direct effect on commitment (direct effect = .215, t = 

5.360, p < .05) and in-depth exploration (direct effect = .251, t = -3.340, p > .05). 

Furthermore, de-identification acts as a mediator in the relationship between the quality of 

sibling relationships and commitment (indirect effect = -.030, z = -2.696, p < .05), in-depth 

exploration (indirect effect = -.040, z = -3.340, p < .05), and reconsideration of commitment 

(indirect effect = -.087, z = -3.361, p < .05). 
 

Table 2 

Direct and Indirect Effect of the Quality of Sibling Relationships toward Identity Formation 

through the Identification Process  
Variable Value S.E. t/z p 

Modeling as mediator 

SR => Commitment (path c’) -.065 .563 -1.990 .323 

SR => In-depth exploration (path c’) -.059 .508 -1.759 .079 

SR => Reconsideration of commitment (path c’) -.187 .859 -1.870 .062 

SR => Modeling => Commitment -.120 .053 -2.285 .022 

SR => Modeling => In-depth exploration -.106 .047 -2.240 .025 

SR => Modeling => Reconsideration of commitment -.056 .079 -1.708 .479 

De-identification as mediator     

SR => Commitment (path c’) -.215 .558 -5.360 .001 

SR => In-depth exploration (path c’) -.251 .493 -7.067 .001 

SR => Reconsideration of commitment (path c’) -.044 .811 --.750 .454 

SR => Modeling => Commitment -.030 .011 -2.696 .007 

SR => Modeling => In-depth exploration -.040 .012 -3.340 .001 

SR => Modeling => Reconsideration of commitment -.087 .023 -3.366 .001 

Note S.R. = Sibling relationship 

Discussion 

This study examines the identification process as a mediator in the relationship between the 

quality of sibling relationships and identity formation. The results found that the indirect 

effect of the quality of sibling relationships through the identification process towards 

identity formation was more significant than the direct effect. The results discovered that the 

modeling identification process is a mediator between the quality of sibling relationships and 

identity formation on the dimensions of commitment and in-depth exploration. In addition, 

de-identification mediates the quality of sibling relationships with the three dimensions of 

identity formation, namely commitment, in-depth exploration, and reconsideration of 

commitment. These results show that the quality of relationships with siblings that indicate 

positive relationships facilitates adolescents to model their older siblings to achieve optimal 

self-identity formation. On the other hand, when adolescents de-identify siblings because of 

negative relationships, they will experience a more complicated process of identity 



Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal 73 

 

          Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator)  

formation. Therefore, this shows that the quality of relationships with relatives leads to the 

difference in the identification process, resulting in different identity resolutions.  

Although there have been no similar studies examining the mediator variables between 

the quality of relationships with siblings and identity formation, this study supports a 

previous study that discovered that sibling relationships play a role in identity formation 

(Wong et al., 2010). In addition, Crocetti et al. (2016) also found that a positive relationship 

with siblings was associated with identity commitment. This study also found that the quality 

of sibling relationships can encourage adolescents to carry out in-depth exploration and 

commitment. However, this study found that the quality of sibling relationships had a more 

significant indirect effect on adolescent identity formation through the identification process. 

The result can be an alternative to the dynamics of the relationship between the quality of 

sibling relationships and identity formation that have been discovered in previous studies 

(Crocetti et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2010).  

Sibling relationships influence each other's cognitive, social, and emotional 

development as good relationship quality is characterized by a high level of warmth and 

closeness (Alekseeva, Kozlova, Baskaeva, & Pyankova, 2014; Ponti & Smorti, 2019; Smorti 

& Ponti, 2018; Sommantico, Donizzetti, Parrello, & De Rosa, 2019). The positive 

relationship creates a belief in the younger sibling that the older ones are good role models. 

Furthermore, modeling is characterized by the opportunity for adolescents to learn from each 

other through observation (Howe et al., 2020; Vleuten et al., 2020). Adolescents ask 

questions about many things and exchange ideas to obtain valuable insights to help form 

their identity. This finding is in line with a previous study that discovered that the quality of 

good relations with siblings directs adolescents to perform modeling (Wong et al., 2010). 

The modeling process conducted by adolescents helps them discover goals and 

directions in the future, choose alternatives of life that are suitable with the self-sense that 

they want to develop, and choose the direction of work in the future (Schwartz et al., 2011). 

According to observational learning theory, younger siblings can learn and observe the 

values and interests of older siblings. Moreover, a study conducted by Wong et al. (2010) 

discovered that older siblings reach self-identity maturity earlier than younger siblings. In 

this condition, the younger sibling is likely to have the same commitment and deep 

exploration as the older sibling who first reached identity commitment through the modeling 

process. 

However, not all sibling relationships are full of love, support, and friendship. There 

are also forms of hostile relationships and display aggressive behavior (Hamwey & 

Whiteman, 2021; Kim & Kim, 2019; Tucker, Sharp, Van Gundy, & Rebellon, 2019). This 

poor relationship quality leads adolescents to perform de-identification. This relationship 

makes adolescents strive to overcome potential feelings of inferiority and develop qualities 

different from older siblings (Whiteman et al., 2011). The lack of communication also makes 

adolescents lose the opportunity to learn and observe each other. Adolescents who tend to 

de-identify will develop different attributes, activities, and behaviors from older siblings to 

find identity in their way. Under these conditions, adolescents who experience de-

identification find it more difficult to achieve optimal identity formation because they do not 

commit, explore in-depth, and reconsider commitments.  

In general, this study contributes to further explaining the relationship between quality 

of sibling relationship and identity formation discovered previously (Crocetti et al., 2016; 

Wong et al., 2010). This study complements previous research by proposing the role of the 

identification process as a mediator between the quality of sibling relationships and identity 

formation. The findings indicate that the quality of the relationship with siblings formerly 



74   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

makes adolescents perform the modeling process on older siblings before achieving optimal 

identity. The quality of positive relationships with siblings helps develop identity 

commitment, similar to their older siblings. Adolescents experiencing modeling can imitate 

and learn from older siblings, which helps form identities. However, it is possible to rule out 

the possibility of older siblings having the opportunity to process the younger ones. In 

addition, it is interesting to question the quality of sibling relationships over the long term, 

specifically when siblings no longer live together due to education, work, and marriage 

(Gilligan, Stocker, & Jewsbury Conger, 2020). 

The positive quality of sibling relationships can be a source of support other than 

parents in identity formation. On the other hand, poor sibling relationships tend to lead 

adolescents to de-identify. De-identification makes it more difficult for adolescents to 

achieve an optimal identity. This study expands the investigation of the role of the family, 

which is still limited to the role of parents in examining the formation of adolescent identity 

by involving the identification process. Sibling, specifically older sibling, can be significant 

person who also helps adolescents form an identity. 

This study has several advantages that complement the previous research (Crocetti et 

al., 2016; Wong et al., 2010), considering the age difference between siblings to be four 

years. Siblings who are close in age are more likely to imitate each other. Jensen, Pond, and 

Padilla-Walker (2015) revealed that it is more likely to see relationship dynamics in siblings 

close in age than those at distant age. Siblings who are closer in age tend to perform the 

process of comparing themselves to one another. However, the results of this study 

contribute to understanding the role of the identification process in the relationship between 

sibling relationship quality and adolescent identity formation. On the other hand, some 

limitations are that this study uses a cross-sectional design. It cannot explain the stability and 

changes of the identification process variables, the quality of sibling relationships, and 

identity formation that can be explained while using a longitudinal design. 

Conclusion 

This study concludes that older siblings can play a significant role in the process of identity 

formation. The role of siblings depends on the quality of the relationships between siblings. 

The differences in quality that exist lead adolescents to carry out different identification 

processes, namely modeling and de-identification, which have a different impact on identity 

formation. Adolescents who perform modeling can learn from and imitate older siblings to 

help achieve optimal identity. Even though they both direct adolescents to perform identity 

formation, de-identification adolescents will be more difficult and experience more 

challenges that they must face to achieve optimal identity. 

 

 

References 

 

Aguirre, J., & Matta, J. (2021). Walking in your footsteps: Sibling spillovers in higher 

education choices. Economics of Education Review, 80(1), 102062. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102062 

Alekseeva, O. S., Kozlova, I. E., Baskaeva, O. V., & Pyankova, S. D. (2014). Intelligence 

and sibling relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 146, 187–191. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.107 

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775720305483?via%3Dihub
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814047612?via%3Dihub


Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal 75 

 

          Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator)  

psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of 

Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-

3514.51.6.1173 

Branje, S., de Moor, E. L., Spitzer, J., & Becht, A. I. (2021). Dynamics of identity 

development in adolescence: A decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 

31(4), 908–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12678 

Buist, K. L., Deković, M., & Prinzie, P. (2013). Sibling relationship quality and 

psychopathology of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology 

Review, 33(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.007 

Crocetti, E. (2018). Identity dynamics in adolescence: Processes, antecedents, and 

consequences. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 11–23. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1405578 

Crocetti, E., Benish-Weisman, M., & McDonald, K. L. (2020). Validation of the Arabic and 

Hebrew versions of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-

MICS). Journal of Adolescence, 79, 11–15. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.006 

Crocetti, E., Branje, S., Rubini, M., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. H. (2016). Identity processes 

and parent-child and sibling relationships in adolescence: A five-wave multi-informant 

longitudinal study. Child Development, 88(1), 210–228. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12547 

Crocetti, E., Hale, W. W., Dimitrova, R., Abubakar, A., Gao, C.-H., & Pesigan, I. J. A. 

(2015). Generalized anxiety symptoms and identity processes in cross-cultural samples 

of adolescents from the general population. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44(2), 159–

174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-014-9275-9 

Crocetti, E., & Meeus, W. H. (2014). "Family comes first!" Relationships with family and 

friends in Italian emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1463–1473. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.012 

Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., & Meeus, W. H. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity 

formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional 

model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207–222. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002 

Fraley, R. C., & Tancredy, C. M. (2012). Twin and sibling attachment in a nationally 

representative sample. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 308–316. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432936 

Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships 

in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 1016–1024. 

https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016 

Gilligan, M., Stocker, C. M., & Conger, K. J. (2020). Sibling relationships in adulthood: 

Research findings and new frontiers. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 305–

320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12385 

Gungordu, N., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2020). Sibling relationship dynamics relates to young 

adults' empathic responding. Journal of Family Studies. Online first. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1753560 

Gurantz, O., Hurwitz, M., & Smith, J. (2020). Sibling effects on high school exam taking 

and performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 178, 534–549. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.026 

Hamwey, M. K., & Whiteman, S. D. (2021). Jealousy links comparisons with siblings to 

adjustment among emerging adults. Family Relations, 70(2), 483–497. 

https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.51.6.1173
https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.51.6.1173
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12678
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272735812001596?via%3Dihub
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405629.2017.1405578
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014019711930226X?via%3Dihub
https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.12547
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10566-014-9275-9
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014019711400027X?via%3Dihub
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140197107000954?via%3Dihub
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167211432936
https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0012-1649.21.6.1016
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12385
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13229400.2020.1753560
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268120302481?via%3Dihub


76   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12428 

Howe, N., Persram, R. J., & Bergeron, C. (2020). Sibling relationships in adolescence. In 

The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1–14. Wiley. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad410 

Hughes, C., McHarg, G., & White, N. (2018). Sibling influences on prosocial behavior. 

Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 96–101. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.015 

International Test Commission. (2017). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests 

(2nd ed). [www.InTestCom.org]. 

Jensen, A. C., Pond, A. M., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2015). Why can't I be more like my 

brother? The role and correlates of sibling social comparison orientation. Journal of 

Youth and Adolescence, 44(11), 2067–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0327-

8 

Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications. 

Killoren, S. E., Alfaro, E. C., & Kline, G. (2016). Mexican American emerging adults' 

relationships with siblings and dimensions of familism values. Personal Relationships, 

23(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12125 

Kim, J., & Kim, E. (2019). Bullied by siblings and peers: The role of rejecting/neglecting 

parenting and friendship quality among Korean children. Journal of Interpersonal 

Violence, 34(11), 2203–2226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516659659 

Kindelberger, C., Mallet, P., & Galharret, J. M. (2020). Diversity of romantic experiences in 

late adolescence and their contribution to identity formation. Social Development, 

29(2), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12415 

Michikyan, M. (2020). Linking online self‐presentation to identity coherence, identity 

confusion, and social anxiety in emerging adulthood. British Journal of Developmental 

Psychology, 38(4), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12337 

Montgomery, M. J. (2020). Identity development theories. In The Encyclopedia of Child and 

Adolescent Development (pp. 1–12). Wiley. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad452 

Morsünbül, Ü. (2013). An investigation of the relationships between agency, identity 

formation and life satisfaction in adolescence period. Dusunen Adam: The Journal of 

Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 26(2), 164–170. 

https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2013260206 

Morsünbül, Ü., Crocetti, E., Cok, F., & Meeus, W. H. (2016). Identity statuses and 

psychosocial functioning in Turkish youth: A person-centered approach. Journal of 

Adolescence, 47, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.001 

Muttaqin, D. (2017). Validitas Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-

MICS) versi Indonesia: Struktur faktor, invariansi pengukuran gender, dan usia. Jurnal 

Psikologi, 44(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.27578 

Muttaqin, D. (2020). The role of cultural orientation in adolescent identity formation: Self-

construal as a mediator. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 24(1), 7–16. 

https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1050719 

Nelson, L. J., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2013). Flourishing and floundering in emerging adult 

college students. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 67–78. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812470938 

Nicoletti, C., & Rabe, B. (2019). Sibling spillover effects in school achievement. Journal of 

Applied Econometrics, 34(4), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2674 

Ominyi, E. J., Adepeju, O., & Matthew, B. (2019). Peer influence as a predictor of identity 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12428
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad410
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X17301185?via%3Dihub
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10964-015-0327-8
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10964-015-0327-8
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pere.12125
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260516659659
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sode.12415
https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjdp.12337
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad452
https://arsiv.dusunenadamdergisi.org/ing/Articledetailsa5ac.html?MkID=938
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140197115002110?via%3Dihub
https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/27578
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/hubsasia/vol24/iss1/3/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167696812470938
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jae.2674


Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal 77 

 

          Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator)  

formation among secondary school students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. American Journal 

of Creative Education, 2(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.20448/815.22.45.54 

Piotrowski, K. (2018). Adaptation of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments 

Scale (U-MICS) to the measurement of the parental identity domain. Scandinavian 

Journal of Psychology, 59(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12416 

Ponti, L., & Smorti, M. (2019). The roles of parental attachment and sibling relationships on 

life satisfaction in emerging adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 

36(6), 1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518771741 

Ritchie, R. A., Meca, A., Madrazo, V. L., Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Zamboanga, B. L., 

… Lee, R. M. (2013). Identity dimensions and related processes in emerging adulthood: 

Helpful or harmful? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 415–432. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21960 

Rogers, C. R., Guyer, A. E., Nishina, A., & Conger, K. J. (2018). Developmental change in 

sibling support and school commitment across adolescence. Journal of Research on 

Adolescence, 28(4), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12370 

Ruiz, G. (2012). Siblings, identity development, and clinical process. Journal of the 

American Psychoanalytic Association, 60(6), 1289–1295. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065112464393 

Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Meca, A., Waterman, A. S., Picariello, S., 

… Forthun, L. F. (2015). Identity in young adulthood: Links with mental health and 

risky behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 39–52. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.10.001 

Schwartz, S. J., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Hale, W. W., Frijns, T., Oosterwegel, A., … 

Meeus, W. H. (2011). Daily dynamics of personal identity and self-concept clarity. 

European Journal of Personality, 25(5), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.798 

Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Luyckx, K., Meca, A., & Ritchie, R. A. (2013). Identity 

in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerging Adulthood, 

1(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813479781 

Smorti, M., & Ponti, L. (2018). How does sibling relationship affect children's prosocial 

behaviors and best friend relationship quality? Journal of Family Issues, 39(8), 2413–

2436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755195 

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. 

In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290–312). Jossey-Bass. 

Sommantico, M., Donizzetti, A. R., Parrello, S., & De Rosa, B. (2019). Predicting young 

adults' romantic relationship quality: Sibling ties and adult attachment styles. Journal 

of Family Issues, 40(5), 662–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18820381 

Sugimura, K., Niwa, T., Takahashi, A., Sugiura, Y., Jinno, M., & Crocetti, E. (2015). 

Cultural self-construction and identity formation in emerging adulthood: A study on 

Japanese university students and workers. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(10), 1326–

1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1039964 

Trost, K., Eichas, K., Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Galanti, M. R. (2020). The study of family 

context: Examining its role for identity coherence and adolescent adjustment for 

Swedish adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(2), 165–196. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431619833479 

Tucker, C. J., Sharp, E. H., Van Gundy, K. T., & Rebellon, C. (2019). Perpetration of sibling 

aggression and sibling relationship quality in emerging adulthood. Personal 

Relationships, 26(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12288 

Vleuten, M. van der, Weesie, J., & Maas, I. (2020). Sibling influence in field of study 

https://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajce/article/view/328
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12416
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265407518771741
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.21960
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12370
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003065112464393
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0193397314001221?via%3Dihub
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1002/per.798
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167696813479781
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X18755195
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X18820381
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13676261.2015.1039964
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272431619833479
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pere.12288


78   

               ISSN 2598-6368 (online) / ISSN 1693-7236 (print) 
  

Aurellya & Muttaqin (Quality of sibling relationships and identity formation: Identification processes as a mediator) 

choices. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 68(June), 100525. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100525 

Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Kim, S. Y., Lee, R. M., Armenta, B. E., … 

Agocha, V. B. (2013). Good choices, poor choices: Relationship between the quality of 

identity commitments and psychosocial functioning. Emerging Adulthood, 1(3), 163–

174. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813484004 

Weisskirch, R. S. (2019). Grit applied within: Identity and well-being. Identity, 19(2), 98–

108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2019.1604345 

Whiteman, S. D., Bernard, J. M. B., & McHale, S. M. (2010). The nature and correlates of 

sibling Influence in two-parent African American families. Journal of Marriage and 

Family, 72(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00698.x 

Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2007). Competing processes of sibling 

influence: Observational learning and sibling deidentification. Social Development, 

16(4), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00409.x 

Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Soli, A. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on sibling 

relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(2), 124–139. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00087.x 

Wikle, J. S., Jensen, A. C., & Hoagland, A. M. (2018). Adolescent caretaking of younger 

siblings. Social Science Research, 71(March), 72–84. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.12.007 

Wong, T. M. L., Branje, S. J. T., VanderValk, I. E., Hawk, S. T., & Meeus, W. H. (2010). 

The role of siblings in identity development in adolescence and emerging adulthood. 

Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 673–682. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.11.003 

  

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0276562420300615?via%3Dihub
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167696813484004
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15283488.2019.1604345
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00698.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00409.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00087.x
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0049089X17304556?via%3Dihub
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140197109001481?via%3Dihub

