




































 Humanities and Social Science Research; Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 
ISSN 2576-3024   E-ISSN 2576-3032 

https://doi.org/10.30560/hssr.v4n1p39 

 39 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

A Back-Door Entrance into Teaching Teachers 
Pulane Lefoka1 

1 Independent Consultant, Lesotho 
Correspondence: Pulane Lefoka, Independent Consultant, Lesotho. ORCID ID: 000-0001-7549-1754 
 
Received: February 24, 2021; Accepted: March 25, 2021; Published: March 26, 2021 
 
Abstract 
This paper is based on PhD research that was carried out at the National University of Lesotho’s Faculty of 
Education. The focus of the study was on the sources and application of professional knowledge among teacher 
educators. The content of the paper was drawn from the Chapter of the theses which presented findings on 
enactment of professional knowledge. Eight teachers participated in the study. All entered the teacher educators’ 
world through the backdoor; that is, some were invited by their teacher educators to work as teaching assistants 
while others applied to an advertised position. None of them had teaching in higher education credentials, hence 
my claim: back-door entrance. Their major source of professional knowledge is experiential and their professional 
lives have been shaped by their context. However, practice-based knowledge presents numerous challenges 
including lack of knowledge of the pedagogy of teaching student-teachers and bias towards using transmissive 
methods of teaching instead of interactive ones. The study concludes that teacher educators who participated in 
the study would benefit from enrolling in higher education programmes that would equip them with higher 
education knowledge and skills in the context of teaching student-teachers.   
Keywords: teacher educator, student-teacher, enactment of professional knowledge, practical knowledge, 
pedagogy, phronesis, teaching teaching and learning 
1. Introduction 
This paper shares the findings of a study which was carried out at the National University of Lesotho’s (NUL) 
Faculty of Education. The study focused on teacher educators based in the Faculty. In undertaking the study there 
was an observation that teacher education institutions experience of having to hire teacher educators is necessitated 
by programmes run in higher education institutions particularly the faculty responsible for educating prospective 
teachers. This study has established that the institution does not hire the appropriate manpower to teach in the 
faculty of education and that the university does not offer higher education programmes aimed at preparing 
university teachers. People who are employed to teach prospective teachers often assume the responsibility of 
teaching without an appropriate qualification. Additionally, they rarely receive mentoring on the discourse of 
teaching student teachers and they therefore have to acquire the skills for teaching in higher education on the job. 
Lack of the discourse of teaching prospective teachers is sometimes referred to as “a role akin to an absentee 
landlord”. The National University of Lesotho, the context for the study shared in this paper, does not seem to 
ponder on the criteria for employing teacher educators and what they are expected to do once they are engaged in 
the practice of teaching prospective teachers.  
There are therefore great challenges regarding the education of teacher educators and the extent to which their 
career can be recognised as a distinct or well-defined profession. Studies of the teacher educators’ sources of 
professional knowledge have to be carried out to resolve challenges posed by the lack of empirical research in this 
area. 
Establishing the extent to which the institution employs people who are not qualified to teach prospective teachers 
is problematic necessitated engaging in the study. The intention was to find out whether teaching in higher 
education particularly in the faculty of education was a problem worth studying. The major question for 
undertaking this study was: What are the sources of teacher educators’ professional knowledge? While there was 
this big question there were other questions. For purposes of this paper the relevant question asked in undertaking 
the study was: How do teacher educators enact professional knowledge? 
 
 
 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 40 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

2. Literature  
2.1 Introduction 
The literature reviewed for this paper indicates that historically, teacher educators were not trained to teach in 
higher education institutions. For example, Drakensberg (2000) shares the feeling of being employed to teach 
teachers in a situation where one does not even have the skills that prospective teachers are expected to acquire. 

I was offered an appointment as a teacher educator at a teacher education college. All of a sudden, having … 
a PhD, I was qualified as a teacher educator and qualified to tell others how to teach … something I had 
never done myself. In such a situation good advice is expensive, so the friendly and nice teacher educators 
at that teachers’ college taught me to be a teacher-educator (p.70).  

Drakensberg (2000) is an example of a teacher educator who was trusted to educate prospective teachers while he 
did not have the expertise on undertaking the task.  
The literature also refers to the context in the field of teacher education or what Clandinin and Connelly (1995) 
refer to as “teachers’ professional landscapes” which play a significant role in shaping teacher educators and their 
work. It is about how people think and act. Beginning with their descriptions of what the “teacher educators” 
consider themselves to be and later showing the relationship between the origins of their professional journeys and 
how the context has contributed to their ongoing journeys.  
2.2 Researching teacher education 
Research in the context of teaching is a critical area. In Loughran’s (2007) view, teacher educators are required to 
make teaching in this context a site for inquiry. Loughran (2007) argues that it is important to understand the 
complex nature of teaching teaching in the context of teacher education. The complexity is embedded in the very 
nature of teaching itself. Therefore, as Loughran (2007) argues, teacher educators have to develop the pedagogy 
of teacher education. The intention in developing the pedagogy of teacher education should be to signify the 
relationship between teaching about teaching and learning about teaching. In such a context, teaching about 
teaching might be purposefully examined, described, articulated and portrayed in ways that enhance an 
understanding of this complex interplay.  
Learning from studying one’s own teaching is likely to impact on the teacher educator’s understanding of the 
complex nature of teaching and learning (Loughran, 2005, Campbell and McNamara, 2010). Campbell and 
McNamara, (2010) add that self-study is a possible response to educational policy makers’ demands regarding the 
standards and quality and that teacher educators can collaborate with secondary school teachers, own students and 
colleagues in order to study the practice of teacher educators teaching about teaching. Loughran (2006) sees 
teaching teaching as playing a complicated dual role which requires “vigilance that is perhaps not so easily 
apprehended in the normal day to day expectations and experiences of teacher education programmes” (p.7).   
2.3 Enacting Teaching Teaching 
There is reference to the methods of enacting teacher education. Transmissive mode of teaching, especially in the 
context of teaching teaching, is heavily criticised by some researchers (Bullock, 2007, Loughran, 2006 and 
Loughran 2007). However, the teacher educators who participated in the study whose results are shared in this 
paper, seemed to promote what Schön (1987) argues is an extensive bias towards a technical rationality approach 
to teaching. Yet as Loughran (2006) seems to argue, upholding the ideals of technical rationality promotes 
dependency on the part of student teachers. In contrast, teacher educators are encouraged to reduce the technical 
rationality and to practise making the tacit explicit which, among others, requires teacher educators to constantly 
involve student teachers (Loughran, 2006) in learning. These questions should actually challenge teacher educators’ 
knowledge of practice which Loughran argues, is vital to a pedagogy of teacher education or teaching teaching. 
Therefore, in practice, teacher educators should, according to Bullock (2007) and Loughran (2007), endeavour to 
develop ways of engaging student teachers in learning.  
The literature seems to suggest that teaching teaching has to be a concerted effort by all teacher educators. They 
could draw from established theories, such as that of Schön (1983), on the reframing of practice situations to the 
extent that student-teachers begin to move from “predominantly thinking about themselves" to thinking beyond 
their contexts. This way, even as teacher educators make reference to secondary schools, to serving teachers and 
to students at this level, the reframing of practice would contribute to student-teachers viewing teaching as 
“problematic” and not routine practices that they are probably much familiar with. 
 
 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 41 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

2.4 Authenticity 
The challenge for teacher educators, as Slabbert, De Kock and Hattingh (2009) argue, is to design an authentic 
quality education that encompasses all kinds and levels of learners, irrespective of place and time. Such an 
educational enterprise may be characterised by its aim. Therefore, if the aim of education is to maximize, to 
completely develop and to fully utilize the human potential through facilitating lifelong authentic learning in order 
to create a safe, sustainable and prosperous future for all, the actual quality is clearly expressed with an educational 
aim that could be regarded as universal.  
2.5 Learning to Teach 
This paper presents research on teacher educators and, to some extent, refers to their learning to teach. Discussing 
learning as a consequence of experience, Stuart (1998) argues that professional learning is part of the process of 
human growth and development and that in the end everyone has to do his/her own learning. In the context of 
practical or experiential based knowledge, Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999) refer to two conceptions of teacher 
learning. These are knowledge-in-practice and knowledge-of-practice. The concept knowledge-in-practice entails 
practical knowledge, including reflection on practice. The assumption here is that teachers learn when they 
demonstrate their expertise, especially in situations where they are capable of making intelligent judgments. 
Additionally, teachers demonstrate expertise when they are designers of rich learning interactions in a classroom 
context. Knowledge-of-practice is knowledge that teachers need if they are to teach well. It is knowledge that is 
generated when they treat their own classrooms and institutions as sites for intentional investigation. At the same 
time, they treat the knowledge and theory produced by others as generative material for interrogation and 
interpretation.  
2.6 Conclusion 
The reviewed literature discussed the teacher educators’ landscape based on those who researched teacher 
educators in their world of work. The section below discusses the method that was used in undertaking the research.  
3. Method 
The research methodology adopted in undertaking this research is qualitative in approach, following a decision 
influenced by an understanding that finding an answer to the question: How do teacher educators enact 
professional knowledge? The answer to this complex research question could not be found by merely asking 
questions following a quantitative approach. I therefore concur with researchers who argue that there are times 
when it is appropriate to use qualitative research. In fact, Creswell (2007) puts it more succinctly when he argues 
that researchers conduct qualitative research because a problem or issue needs to be explored.  
3.1 Description of the Subsections 
This section of the paper describes procedure followed in undertaking the research and analysing the data. The 
sample procedures and the sample size are discussed. 
3.2 Sampling Procedures and Size 
A total of eight teacher educators participated in the study: 4 from the Department of Educational Foundations, 2 
from Science Education and 2 from the Department of Language and Social Education. There were 6 females; 4 
with PhDs, 3 with M.Ed. degrees and 1 with an M.Sc. Four of these research participants were subject specialists 
or curriculum specialists, in English, Geography, Science and Mathematics; 3 were from Educational Foundations; 
Educational Management, Instructional Supervision and Counselling, and 1 was in Educational Technology.  
The choice of fewer research participants was informed by arguments on purposeful sampling strategies presented 
by McMillan and Schumacher (2006) as being advantageous. In these researchers’ view “purposeful sampling is 
done to increase the utility of information obtained from small samples. … The power and logic of purposeful 
sampling is that a few cases studied in depth yield many insights about the topic, …” (p.319).  
In the case of this study, having individuals in each of the three Faculty of Education departments especially 
coupled with subject areas, experience and gender served as an important factor.  
The idea of observing teacher educators in practice was to counteract receiving information solely through self-
reported data, in this case narrative data. Most importantly, observation as a qualitative data gathering technique 
was used to enable me to gain a deeper insight and understanding of the phenomenon being observed (Nieuwenhuis, 
2007b). The purpose was to observe the research participants as they enacted professional knowledge. 
The use of the video camera to capture the classroom activities helped reduce weaknesses associated with 
classroom observation, the major one being that observational data collection technique is by its nature highly 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 42 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

selective and subjective, with a tendency to focus on a specific event or object but seldom the whole (Nieuwenhuis, 
2007b).  
However, McMillan and Schumacher (2006), see advantages to this approach of collecting data, since 
observational methods have as their primary advantage that the researcher “does not need to worry about the 
limitations of self-report bias, social desirability, and response set and that the information is not limited to what 
can be recalled accurately by the subjects” (p.208). Most importantly, as pointed out by Mercer (1991), there is a 
need to record very detailed classroom discourse. In doing so, the behaviour of a research participant can be 
recorded as it occurs naturally (McMillan & Schumacher, 2006). 
3.3 Data Analysis 
The process of data collection particularly the observations of the research participants in practice, produced 
volumes of videotaped and audio-taped data. The presentation illustrates the level of availability of each research 
participant: Fusi: 13 observations; Hoanghoang: 13 observations; Lintle: 12 observations; Mafukuthoana: 03 
observation; Masethabathaba: 21 observations; Peditta: 13 observations; Thabang: 04 observations and Zinzi:19 
observations. All in all, 98 observations were made. Some research participants were, more available than others. 
In analysing the data, I used Eraut (1994) maps of professional knowledge in particular knowing “HOW”. He 
equates knowing HOW with practical knowledge and that this is accomplished by analysing responses to questions 
such as “How do teacher educators enact professional knowledge, what kind of professional knowledge do teacher 
educators construct and how do they model professional knowledge?”. However, for purposes of this paper the 
focus was on enactment of professional knowledge. Hence analysis of video and audio taped data. 
The data analysis progressed in phases, with some being more time consuming and exhausting than others, 
although most enabled me to become familiar with and internalise the data. On the one hand transcribing the 
classroom observations through repeatedly watching the videotaped material meant watching the participants in 
practice more than once. On the other, listening to audio-taped stories and transcribing them meant going over 
each story at least three times. Being immersed in the transcriptions helped me to internalise the data to the extent 
that going through the process appeared very enriching, learning what the research participants regarded as the 
sources of their professional knowledge and how they applied them.  
The analysis of the data provided an opportunity to thematize the information. 
4. Results 
As alluded to in the introduction of this paper, the study asked the question: where do teacher educators draw their 
professional knowledge from? This question was relevant in the context in which teacher educators did not have 
training on educating student-teachers. Response to this question indicated that they attained their professional 
knowledge from experience.  
4.1 An Understanding of the Concept: Teacher Educator 
The teacher educators who participated in the study were challenged to describe their understanding of teacher 
educator as a concept. There are two interpretations, based on the analysis of what the participants in the study 
believe that they are. Their descriptions centre on the knowledge that they provide to the student teachers. They 
assist student teachers to develop their own knowledge; they are capable of equipping student teachers with the 
skills which are required in the teaching profession; and they intervene in peoples’ lives in order to promote change 
and help student teachers to unleash their potential in a manner that demonstrates worthiness in what they do. 
These descriptions attract potential teachers to the profession.   
While their understanding of teacher educator may, to a large extent, be similar to the established descriptions of 
this concept, their interpretation was particularly lacking in the key areas; viewing teacher educators as researchers 
or as professionals of a particular competence. Yet research has revealed that over and above being instructors of 
learning, teacher educators are also researchers and professionals and/or scholars (Fisher, 2005; Smith, 2003) in 
their own right.  
4.2 The Origin of the Teacher Educators’ Journeys 
The teacher educators who participated in the study were asked origins of their teacher education journey. Some 
joined the institution through an invitation while others joined through applying to an advertised position. Those 
who applied for an advertised position indicated that they found working in a university as an opportunity to 
assume the status of working in an institution of higher learning; One of the participants had this to say “…the 
choice of being a teacher educator was merely getting a better job; there was nothing more to it”.  
 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 43 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

4.3 Potential Teacher Educators Enter Teacher Education Institutions as Invitees  
Two of the eight teacher educators who participated in the study joined the teacher education career as teaching 
assistants on the basis of their good performance in their undergraduate teacher education programme. 
Questionable though is whether the performance that was considered in inviting them was in the context of teacher 
education discipline or their areas of specialisation such as Mathematics Education. Even as they told their stories 
on how they were appointed, the criteria used are not clear. Their voices confirm this interpretation. (The names 
used in the study were nick names). 

’Masethabathaba: “I just remember that before the end of the academic year at the time that I was to leave 
the University one of my lecturers called me and said, ‘What would you do if you were offered a position 
as a Teaching Assistant?” 
Zinzi: “I was just lucky, one of the lecturers said to me you are doing so well, maybe we should take you to 
be a Teaching Assistant”. 

These extracts imply that in identifying potential teacher educators, the teacher educators in the service are 
influenced by the performance of the student-teachers and choose the best of them to join the career. They therefore 
seem to serve as the “behind the door” recruiting argents for their own institution and programmes. 
4.4 Potential Teacher Educators Enter through Applying to an Advertised Post 
The study established that some teacher educators join teacher education departments through applying to an 
advertised post. Six participants indicated that they became teacher educators through applying to an advertised 
post. Their reasons were different. Some had applied because they had majored in a subject for which a teacher 
educator was needed while others applied because they had the opinion that they had the relevant skill.  One of 
them had this to say: 

Peditta: There were no job opportunities in the mental health department. When a job vacancy presented 
itself at …, they needed a lecturer in science. I actually applied for it; in fact, I did not even think I would 
qualify. I did not have a professional qualification then but because I had done psychology, they thought it 
was a good foundation for somebody who wanted to be a teacher of teachers.  

Peditta’s experience indicates that some teacher educators join the teacher education fraternity accidentally. In her 
case, she had other plans before joining the fraternity.  Her previous plan was to be in the medical profession and, 
specifically, to practice in mental health, either as a clinical psychologist or a medical professional.  
Interaction with these participants indicated that some of them did not believe this career was what they initially 
thought they would follow. Therefore, the challenge was thinking beyond how they started their professional 
journeys and how the context in which they were shaped who they are.  
4.5 Shaped by the Context 
The context contributed to professional change amongst the participants of the study. Reference is made to one 
teacher educator, who was initially not in the education field but who was determined to ensure that her 
contribution to teacher education was directed mainly at student teachers. Peditta developed strategies for 
operating and coping within the teacher education context. She acknowledged that the context within which she 
operated as a teacher educator contributed to her professional advancement. This teacher educator became her own 
context; she thrived in a profession in which she accidentally found herself. This view is based on Peditta’s words. 

Peditta: I found that by teaching I actually satisfied the need that I had.  In teaching one is actually 
dealing with a lot of emotional stuff, in a sense. I think that is what actually made me comfortable, … this 
is something which drove me to want to do something in the medical profession and this could actually be 
addressed through teaching.  ...  Although I became a teacher educator by accident, I think I have grown 
to like and enjoy it and actually look for the areas where my needs will be addressed.  

4.6 Teacher Educators in Practice 
4.6.1 Learning in Context  
This study established that teacher educators gained practical knowledge from the context; it gave them an 
important dimension of the training of student-teachers for it brought in the theory and practice dimensions to life. 
It is practicing in context that convinced them to conclude that teaching is tentative and that teachers have to be 
comfortable with that tentativeness. It seems the perspective that teaching is tentative is based on the experience 
that presented them with challenges. They seem to have been shaped by the practical context in which they 
operated and therefore realized that teaching is a complex undertaking. 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 44 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

This study further revealed that the experiences encountered were never documented. The encounters were positive 
and consequently enriching although sometimes they were challenging.  Although the anecdotes were never 
documented, the research participants, upon being interviewed acknowledged that the experiences were 
worthwhile. This means documenting their experiences would have facilitated sharing such knowledge as opposed 
to allowing it to remain tacit. Nevertheless, participating in this study enabled them to reflect on their work. 
Participating in the study also enabled them to experiment with the strategies for handling the classroom-based 
problems and using new knowledge to bear on what they were going to teach. In practice and, as observed by 
Korthagen, Kessels, and Koster, (2001), through their research, teacher educators tend to adhere to the domain of 
phronesis as they learn how to teach the prospective teachers in practice. Therefore, sharing experiential-based 
knowledge could have benefited colleagues and would have allowed the participants of this study to research their 
own teaching.  
4.6.2 Challenging Prospective Teachers 
The extent to which teacher educators challenge the student teachers’ argument is based on the observation of the 
teacher educators in practice. They did not seem to challenge student-teachers to think about the content of the 
courses and the methods employed in teaching it. Challenging student-teachers to think about these two critical 
aspects of teaching teaching is an idea that Loughran (2007) fully articulates as challenging while it contributes 
towards the cognitive development of student teachers and, to a large extent, to that of teacher educators as they 
motivate such developments.  
There are a few incidences where both the content and opportunities for the application of challenging methods of 
teaching it were observed. One teacher educator required the students to constantly think about how they would 
teach their own students. This teacher educator presented student teachers with hypothetical cases in which they 
critiqued the method of teaching that would have been explained in class. In this regard, the student-teachers had 
an opportunity to think deeply and to analyse a particular teaching method. The questions which they raised in 
arguing about the relevance of the method used in teaching a given topic indicated that, given the opportunity to 
critique their teachers’ teaching, student teachers were capable of analysing the situation that they take for granted. 
These were rare opportunities for teacher educators to learn from. However, this study illustrated that the moments 
which spontaneously presented themselves for such lessons were often not seized.  
Therefore, as the study illustrates, teacher educators did not involve their student teachers in significant ways. My 
observation was that teaching was grounded mainly in transmissive methods and, to a less extent, in interactive 
methods of teaching. The challenge for the teacher educators is explicit about what is expected of student-teachers 
and at the same time providing them with opportunities to practise what they are expected to become while they 
are still students.   
4.6.3 Using Technical Language  
In a teaching space setting, teacher educators demonstrated positive development by consistently using technical 
language. This seemed to be aimed at helping student teachers internalize the discipline language. While some of 
the teacher educators used technical language, more can be done. Indeed, as Crowe and Berry (2007) suggest, 
more can be done towards helping student teachers think like teachers. Therefore, the flip side of developing 
positively in this regard is that in practice, student teachers need to engage in activities that require them to think 
more like teachers as opposed to thinking routinely like secondary school students. 
4.6.4 Researching the Teaching of Teaching 
One area which teacher educators do not take advantage of as they practise teaching is the use of research to create 
knowledge. Creation of knowledge facilitates their pedagogy of teaching prospective teachers. Involvement of 
student-teachers in teaching enhances this opportunity. However, research on the teaching of teaching remains a 
challenge to the teacher educators who participated in this study. Observing them in practice and interacting with 
them revealed that research was not a priority in their practice. It would seem that engaging in educational research, 
particularly in the context of teaching teaching could contribute towards their learning more about the career that 
they had joined through the backdoor, created or constructed new knowledge and improved their work as teacher 
educators. Lingard and Renshaw (2010) advise that teacher educators should study their own contexts. 
4.7 Sources of Teacher Educators’ Practical Knowledge 
Determining the sources of teacher educators’ practical knowledge indicated that they operate in complex and 
difficult circumstances. I used the cumulative model to illustrate that although I observed some discrepancies in 
the study, learning did take place as the teacher educators were involved in teaching within the teacher education 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 45 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

programme. It can therefore be argued that the teacher educators who participated in the study are surely not the 
same as they were when they entered the teacher education institution through the backdoor.  
In this case the cumulative model is represented by snow balling. The small ball of snow represents academic or 
formal knowledge obtained from the training. The added snow is the person’s experiential knowledge, what teacher 
educators gain from all the main experiences that they have in professional life across the varied landscapes. The 
snowball does not shrink but grows with each experience. Some parts of the landscape may be snow free, where 
teacher educators did not pick up any new professional knowledge and some may be especially snowy where 
professionals picked up a lot of snow. In this snow ball analogy, there are instances where teacher educators 
pointed to the numerous challenges in the context in which the ball rolls. These are the possible situations in which 
they did not gather any snow. Presumably, as the ball gains momentum and the teacher educators moved through 
the varied “landscape,” they learned from the experiences as novice, advanced beginner, competent, proficient and 
eventually became experts (Eraut. 1996). It is through experience and moving gradually but with conscious 
movements that teacher educators could learn (Loughran, 2006). Figure 1 shows snow ball scenario. 

 
Figure 1. Teacher educator snowball experience model 

 
5. Discussion 
The study established that teacher educators gather experiential knowledge through practice. This view is based 
on observing the participants of this study in practice; they use teaching methods that were used when they were 
student teachers themselves. Teaching teaching cannot be viewed simplistically as just doing teaching, since it is 
much more than that. The nucleus of teacher education is as Shulman (2004) observes complex. Perhaps more 
complex than what these simple descriptions can convey.  
Therefore, referring to the school system and its related matters such as what methods to use in teaching or how 
to teach are far from enacting “the pedagogy” of teacher education or teaching teaching. Instead, these are tips on 
how to teach and what the school context holds for student-teachers. Relevant here is Crowe and Barry’s (2007) 
argument that due to the complexity of teaching, young teachers should be helped to become creative through 
being presented with complex situations so that they can develop strategies intended to challenge the teaching 
situations.  
In a situation where teacher educators do not only make reference to what student teachers are likely to encounter 
as they enter the field of teaching, the latter are encouraged to engage in learning about teaching. In that regard, 
teacher educators would embrace what Lougharn (2007) refers to as being a student of teaching: knowing yourself. 
This is a point that Korthagen and Verkuyl (2007) tested in their own work as teacher educators. Teacher educators 
learn if they allow themselves to play the dual role of being learners and teachers through allowing students to 
critique their teaching. Lougharn (2007) argues that “students of teaching are continually confronted by struggles, 
difficulties and dilemmas that affect their understanding of the nature of teaching as a consequence of their 
experience in learning about teaching” (p.8). 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 46 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

The literature pertaining to … 
Some of the challenges… 
Lack of … 
6. Conclusion 
This study established that the participants entered their teacher education career through the backdoor. They are 
either invited to become teaching assistants or they applied to an advertised position. Most significantly, the 
research participants did not have credentials for teaching in the Faculty that prepares prospective teachers for the 
school system. This finding might explain why they tend to use transmissive methods of teaching as opposed to 
interactive methods. Nevertheless, practice has, to a large extent, shaped their professional knowledge. The 
common feature for these teacher educators, is that they were immersed in the teaching of student-teachers, hence 
the snow ball cumulative model. They learned the art of teaching student-teachers in the actual context of teaching 
prospective teacher. It is therefore significant that the other source of professional knowledge for them is practical 
and/or experiential. 
There is therefore a link between professional knowledge and learning from practice. It can therefore be concluded 
that what teacher educators use in practice is not abstract theoretical knowledge, but phronesis, which entails 
situation-specific principles. It is context-dependent and helps teacher educators to arrive at decisions to solve 
practical problems rapidly. What is important is that it helps teacher educators in practical situations to perceive 
what is relevant in the situation while allowing them to base their actions on their perceptions.  
References  
Bullock, S. M. (2007). Finding my way from Teacher-to-Teacher Educator. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.): 

Enacting a Pedagogy of Teacher Education Values, Relationships and Practices, (pp77- 94). London: 
Routledge. 

Campbell, A., & McNamara, O. (2010). Mapping the Field of Practitioner Research, Inquiry and professional 
Learning in Educational Context: A Review. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith, Connecting Inquiry 
and Professional Learning in Education. London: Routledge.  

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly F. M. (1995). Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Landscapes. New York: Teachers 
College, Columbia University. 

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of Knowledge and Practice. Teacher Learning in 
Communities, Review of Research in Education, (24), 249-305. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001249 

Crowe, A. R., & Berry, A. (2007). Teaching Prospective Teachers about Learning to think like a teacher – 
articulating our principles of practice. In T. Russell & J. Loughran Eds.). Enacting a Pedagogy of Teacher 
Education Values,  Relationships and Practices, (pp31-44). London: Routledge. 

Drakensberg, M. (2000). A Mission for Equality among Students.  In: G. Churukian & C.R. Lock (Eds.). 
International Narratives on Becoming a Teacher Educator.  Pp.69-72. Wales: Edwin Mellen Press. 

Eraut, M. (1996). Professional Knowledge in teacher education. Address to the Finnish conference on Teacher 
Educators, Savonlinna.  

Fisher, R. L. (2005). Standards for Teacher Educators: Preparing High-Quality Teachers. [O]. Retrieved June 
2010 from http://www.Nesic.com/pub2005textframe.htm  

Korthagen, F. A. J., & Verkuyl, H. (2007). Do you Meet your Students or Yourself? Reflection on Professional 
Identity as an Essential Aspect of Teacher Education. In: Making a Difference in Teacher Education through 
Self-Study: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practice. 
Pp 43-47. Herstmonceaux, England. 

Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., & Koster, B. (2001). Linking Practice and Theory – the Pedagogy of Realistic 
Teacher Education. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600523 

Lingard, B., & Renshow, P. (2010). Teaching as a Research-Informed & Research-Informing Profession. In A. 
Campbell, & S. Groundwater-Smith. Connecting Inquiry and Professional Learning in Education. Pp. 36-39. 
London: Routledge 

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator. Journal of Teacher Education.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386 

Loughran, J. (2005). Researching Teaching about Teaching: Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. A Journal 



hssr.ideasspread.org   Humanities and Social Science Research Vol. 4, No. 1; 2021 

 47 Published by IDEAS SPREAD 
 

of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 1(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500039777 
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education – Understanding Teaching and Learning about 

Teaching. London: Routledge. 
Loughran, J. (2007). Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. In T. Russell & J. Loughran: Enacting a Pedagogy 

of Teacher Education: Values, Relationships and Practices. Pp.1-15. London: Routledge.Schon, D. A. (1983). 
The Reflective Practitioner – How professionals Think in Action. England, Gower House. 

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: CA, Jossey-Bass. 
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The Wisdom of Practice – Essays on Teaching, Learning, and Learning to Teach. S. M. 

Wilson (Ed.). San Francisco:  Jossey-Bass. 
Slabbert, J. A., De Kock, T. M., & Hattingh, A. (2009). The Brave ‘New’ World of Education CD. Cape Town: Juta. 
Smith, K. (2003). So, what about professional development of teacher Educators European Journal of Teacher 

Educators, 2(26), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000088738 

 
Copyrights 
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. 
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 

 


