Microsoft Word - Contents.doc


HUNGARIAN JOURNAL 
OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY 

VESZPRÉM 
Vol. 34. pp. 15-20 (2006) 

QUASI-CONTINUOUS ELUTION CHROMATOGRAPHIC PURIFICATION  
OF A STEROID ACTIVE COMPOUND 

K. TEMESVÁRI1, , A. ARANYI1, Z. HORVÁTH1, M. NAGY2, T. SZÁNYA2 and L. HANÁK2 

1Gedeon Richter Ltd., H-1475 Budapest 10. PO Box 27. HUNGARY;  
E-Mail: k.temesvari@richter.hu 

2University of Pannon, Department of Chemical Engineering POB 158, Veszprém, H-8201, HUNGARY 
 

A pilot-scale preparative batch elution chromatographic separation of a steroid active compound from its impurities was 
developed and is applied at our company. The process consists of the following steps: (1.) injection of the crude sample 
solved in the eluent onto the chromatographic column, (2.) elution of the less retained impurities with the eluent, (3.) 
elution of the pure fraction of the active compound (main fraction) with the eluent, (4.) back-flushing the column with the 
more polar solvent component of the eluent to remove the strongly retained compounds, (5.) conditioning the column 
with the eluent to prepare for the next injection. The above mentioned five-step chromatographic process can be realized 
quasi-continuously by applying the Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) instrument. The subsequent steps can be carried out in 
parallel in the zones of the SMB unit, which are independent from each other in this special case. 

In our present paper the elaborated quasi-continuous elution chromatographic separation is shown using the following 
instrument set up and experimental conditions: a KNAUER CSEP 9116 laboratory-scale SMB unit with five KNAUER 
K-501 HPLC pumps and eight columns (column dimension: 250X16 mm I.D.). The columns were packed in our 
laboratory by dry-packing method using vibration, the applied packing material was UETIKON C-490 15-35 μm Si gel. 
The appropriate eluent was methylene chloride/ethyl acetate mixture and as back-flushing solvent, pure ethyl acetate was 
used. After the elaboration of quasi-continuous elution chromatographic purification, the intensification of the process 
was carried out. The specific capacity parameters of the best quasi-continuous experiments were compared with the 
performance parameters of the current batch pilot-scale separation of the compound. 

Keywords: quasi-continuous, pilot-scale, preparative chromatographic separation, steroid, Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) 

Introduction 

In pharmaceutical industry there is a strict demand on 
the quality of active compounds. In most cases the 
amount of all impurities must be under 0.5-1 %, the 
maximum level of individual impurities had to be under 
0.1 %. In many cases these demands can not be fulfil 
with traditional techniques, such as distillation or 
crystallization. Pilot- and process-scale preparative 
chromatographic processes can solve these difficult 
separation problems. [1] 

The preparative chromatographic processes can be 
divided into batch and continuous methods, depending 
on the actual separation task. In some cases these 
techniques can compete with each other. [2-5] 

The application areas of continuous counter-current 
separation methods are chiral, isomer, or other two-
component (or pseudo two-component) separation 
problems. [6-11] 

The Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) technology is 
the up-to-date solution for the practical realization of 
continuous, counter-current preparative chromatographic 
processes. It was invented and patented in the late 
1950’s and was mainly applied in the petrochemical and 
sugar industries for large-scale separations. SMB has 

been introduced in the pharmaceutical industry since the 
1990’s. [12] 

The principle of the technique has been described in 
numerous publications [13-15]. The essence of the 
process is that instead of the continuous transportation 
of the particulate solid phase, which leads to a lot of 
difficulties, (bad efficiency because of high HETP and 
mechanic problems with transportation of the solid 
phase) the moving of the solid phase in packed columns 
is simulated. This simulated moving can be solved 
either by switching the inlets and outlets co-current with 
the liquid flow direction, or by the real rotation of the 
packed columns, connected to special distributing valves. 
(Fig. 1.) 

In the SMB process the strong (S, more retained) 
and weak (W, less retained) components of the feed (F) 
of concentration cF,S and cF,W are separated into two 
outlet flows. In the extract (E, cE,S, cE,W) the better 
adsorbing strong, while in the raffinate (R, cR,S, cR,W) the 
less adsorbing weak components are enriched, 
respectively. (Fig. 2.) 

In purification tasks there are usually one (or some 
more) main compounds in the presence of numerous 
impurities of small amount. In such cases SMB is 
generally not applicable, mainly preparative batch elution 
techniques are used. [16-19] 



 

 

16

 
Fig. 1: Conventional four-zone SMB unit with eight 

columns 
 

The conventional SMB instrument set-up can be 
utilized to solve a batch elution chromatographic 
purification task quasi-continuously, if an astute 
assembling mode of the available unit is applied. 

In this present study the quasi-continuous 
implementation of a current pilot-scale batch elution 
purification of a steroid active compound is shown. The 
process consists of the following steps: (1.) injection of 
the crude sample solved in the eluent onto the 
chromatographic column, (2.) elution of the less retained 
impurities with the eluent, (3.) elution of the pure 
fraction of the active compound (main fraction) with the 
eluent, (4.) back-flushing the column with the more polar 
solvent component of the eluent to remove the strongly 
retained compounds, (5.) conditioning the column with 
the eluent to prepare for the next injection. 

The subsequent steps can be carried out in parallel in 
the zones of the SMB unit, which are independent from 
each other in this special case. 

The Implementation of Quasi-Continuous Process 
Starting from Usual SMB Instrument Set-Up 

The conventional SMB unit has four zones as can be 
seen in Fig.1. and Fig.2.  
 

 
Fig. 2.: One of the applied practical solutions of the 

Simulated Moving Bed 
 

It is possible to carry out the above-mentioned actual 
five-step batch elution chromatographic purification 
procedure quasi-continuously in these zones with the 
help of the rotating switching valve of the SMB 
instrument. As in our special case the zones are 
independent from each other, they can be decomposed 
to six parts and the flow rate can be reversed in zone I, 
as Fig. 3 shows. 

 
Fig. 3.: Quasi-continuous operation with the help of 

rotating switching valve of the SMB unit 
 

The minimum number of columns required in the 
process is eight and in every second position an empty 
short capillary is inserted in the unit. One column and 
one empty position move together to the next position 
in every switching. 

With the knowledge of the solvent volumes necessary 
to the subsequent steps of the separation, the switching 
time of the rotating SMB valve and flow rates of the 
pumps in the zones can be calculated. 

The main steps of the elaboration of the quasi-
continuous process are:  

(A.) Preliminary elution experiment on one of the 
eight 250X16 mm I.D. columns used in the SMB unit 
for quasi-continuous elution separation, for the 
determination of the solvent volumes necessary to the 
steps of the separation. From these data the switching 
time of the rotating SMB valve and the pump flow rates 
can be calculated. (B.) Carrying out a quasi-continuous 
experiment applying the calculated parameters. (C.) 
Refining the process parameters in experimental way. 
(D.) Improvement the productivity by decreasing the 
switching time and proportionally increasing the flow 
rates of the pumps at the same time. 

Experimental 

The problem under investigation was the solution of 
quasi-continuous elution chromatographic purification 
of a steroid active compound, produced by Gedeon 
Richter Ltd. The starting point of the investigation was 
the pilot-plant batch elution chromatographic separation 
of the compound from its impurities, followed by a 
crystallisation step (not published here). This procedure 
has been applied successfully for years. The purity of 
the crude material was 94 % for the active compound. 
The goal was to produce the active compound with a 
purity of >99 %, the maximum level of individual 
impurities had to be under 0.3 %. 



 

 

17

Chemicals 

UETIKON C-490 15-35 μm Si gel was used as the 
stationary phase, it was purchased from ZEOCHEM 
AG (Switzerland). 

The mobile phase was methylene chloride/ethyl 
acetate mixture. The back-flushing solvent was pure 
ethyl acetate. Solvents were purchased from Merck 
KgaA (Darmstadt, Germany). 

Instrumentation 

Preliminary Elution Experiment 

The applied instrument consisted of a KNAUER K-501 
HPLC pump, the volumetric flow rate was set to  
5 mL min-1, one of the eight 250X16 mm I.D. columns 
used in the SMB unit for quasi-continuous elution 
separation, packed with UETIKON C-490 15-35 μm Si 
gel packing material in our laboratory by dry-packing 
method using vibration, and a KNAUER UV/VIS filter 
photometer. The wavelength of the measurement was 
254 nm. For the purpose of recording the chromatogram 
a Radelkis OH-850 potentiometric recorder was applied. 
The temperature was set to 25 ˚C. 

Quasi-Continuous Experiments 

A laboratory-scale SMB unit (KNAUER CSEP 9116) 
was used for the quasi-continuous elution experiments 
with five KNAUER K-501 HPLC pumps and eight 
columns. The columns were packed in our laboratory by 
dry-packing method, using vibration, as we described 
above. (Column dimension was 250X16 mm I.D.). The 
uniformity of columns was tested by elution investigations, 
injecting pure active compound on the columns and 
eluting it with the eluent. In the zone of the pure main 
fraction a KNAUER UV/VIS filter photometer was 
connected. The wavelength was set to 254 nm. For the 
purpose of recording the successive chromatograms a 
Radelkis OH-850 potentiometric recorder was applied. 
The temperature was set to 25 ˚C. (See Fig. 4.) 
 

 
Fig. 4.: KNAUER CSEP 9116 SMB unit assembled for 

quasi-continuous process 

Analytical Method Applied for the Quality Control 
of the Separation 

The quality control of the purified active compound was 
performed by a validated analytical chromatographic 
method, which is applied for the time being in the 
current manufacturing process of the product.  

Preliminary Elution Experiment 

Before beginning the experiment, the column was 
equilibrated with the eluent. The injected sample 
amount was 0.32 g of crude material, which was solved 
in 5 ml methylene-chloride. After the injection step, the 
elution of less retained impurities was started and seven 
fractions were collected, for the purpose of determination 
of the first cut point of the pure main fraction. The end 
cut point of the peak was not so critical, because a 
certain impurity of small amount, eluting in the tail of 
the active compound peak can be removed by the 
crystallization step, following the chromatography. That 
was the reason, why there was no fraction collection 
there.  

 
Fig. 5.: Chromatogram of the preliminary elution 

experiment 
 

When the elution of the main compound was 
finished, the back-flushing with ethyl acetate was 
started and continued until a stable baseline was 
achieved. At the end of the back-flushing, the column 
conditioning was carried out with twice of the column 
volume of the eluent. Based on the pump flow rate and 
speed of the recorder, the solvent volumes, necessary to 
the subsequent steps of the separation could be 
calculated. (Fig.5.) 

Quasi-Continuous Elution Experiments 

The switching time of the rotating SMB valve was 
calculated based on the critical data of the preliminary 
elution experiment, such as the elution volumes of less 
retained impurities and the pure active compound. (See 
Table 1.) The pump flow rates were set in accordance 
with the calculated switching time and the solvent 
volumes, necessary to the steps of the separation. 



 

 

18

Table 1: Results of the preliminary elution experiment 

Steps of the separation Solvent volumes necessary to the subsequent steps of the separation (mL) 
Elution of less retained impurities ≈ 105 

Elution of the pure active compound ≈ 84 
Back-flushing with ethyl acetate minimum 65 

Column conditioning twice of the column volume, minimum 100 
 
 

The crude sample was solved in methylene-chloride, 
which was the weaker solvent component of the eluent. 
The compounds were adsorbed on the surface of 
packing material from this solution in a narrow band at 
the beginning of the columns, therefore the injected 
sample volume could be higher, in most cases exactly 
10.5 mL. In this case the sample pump (P1) flow rate 
was set to 0.5 mL min-1, which was a reasonable value. 

In the quasi-continuous experiments the sample load was 
the same as in the preliminary elution experiment, 
namely 0.32 g of crude material. The exception was 
only the second experiment, in which the sample load 
was lower, exactly 0.29 g of crude material. The process 
parameters of the experiments are summarized in Table 
2. 

 
Table 2: Process parameters of quasi-continuous elution experiments 

Flow rates of the pumps (mL min-1) 

Experiment 
Switching 

time 
(min) 

Sample 
injection 

P1 

Elution of less 
retained 

impurities P5 

Elution of the 
pure active 

compound P4 

Back-
flushing 

P2 

Column 
conditioning P3 

1. 21 0.5 5 4 4 3 
2. 19 0.5 5 4 4 3 
3. 21 0.5 4.7 4 4 3 
4. 21 0.5 4.5 2.5 4 3 
5. 21 0.5 4.5 3.2 4 3 
6. 21 0.5 4.5 3.5 4 3 
7. 21 0.5 4.5 3.5 4 3 
8. 14 0.75 6.75 5.2 6 4.5 

 
 

Results and Discussion 

Results of the Preliminary Elution Experiment 

The aim of this experiment was to determine the solvent 
volumes necessary to the steps of the separation. The 
received data can be seen in Table 1. 

Elaboration and Intensification of the Quasi-
Continuous Process 

As we mentioned before, based on the critical data of 
the preliminary elution experiment, such as the elution 
volumes of less retained impurities and the pure active 
compound, (Table 1.) the applied switching time was 21 
min in the first experiment. In this first run the purity 
was very good, but the recovery was poor, because a 
significant part of the main fraction eluted in the zone of 
the less retained impurities. The reason of the deviation 
between the preliminary elution experiment and the first 
quasi-continuous run was the difference of the extra 
column volumes of the two systems in which the 
experiments were carried out. To improve the result of 
the first quasi-continuous run, two possible ways were 
tried:

The first was the reduction of the switching time, but in 
this case the sample load and volumes of solvents in 
each zone were also decreased, therefore finding the 
optimal set of process parameters was difficult. (2. 
experiment in Table 2.) 
• The other (easier) way was decreasing the flow rate 

in the zone of the less retained impurities. (3. 
experiment) 

 

 
Fig. 6.: Chromatograms of the pure main fractions 

eluted from successive columns 



 

 

19

In the 4., 5. and 6. experiments the cut point at the 
end tail of the main fraction was optimized with varying 
the flow rate in the zone of the active compound for the 
purpose of keeping the recovery as high as possible and 
the level of the above-mentioned impurity under a 
certain limit, with respect to the cleaning effect of the 
crystallisation step. 

With the best process parameters a repetition was 
carried out. (7. experiment) 

In the final step (8. experiment) the productivity was 
increased with decreasing the switching time and 
proportionally increasing the flow rates at the same 

time. The last two runs, switching from parameter set of 
7. experiment to the ones of 8. experiment, with two 
transient peaks can be seen in Fig. 6. 

The reason of transients is that, when the 
experimental parameters were changed, the peak of the 
main fraction from the actually injected sample eluted 
after two switching. That is why the new valuable status 
was possible to see on the recorder after two transient 
peaks. 

The specific capacity parameters of 7. and 8. runs, in 
comparison with the pilot-plant batch elution separation 
are shown in Table 3. 

 
Table 3: The specific capacity parameters of  7. and 8. runs in comparison with the pilot-plant batch elution separation 

Specific capacity parameters 

Experiment 
Specific solvent 

consumption 
Methylene chloride 

(mL g-1) 

Specific solvent 
consumption Ethyl 

acetate 
(mL g-1) 

Productivity 
[g (kg packing hour)-1] 

Recovery 
(m m-1 %) 

Batch elution 
pilot-scale 499.51 214.34 10.15 84.26 

7. 836.02 409.97 4.11 86.85 
8. 761.58 374.30 6.75 95.06 

 
 
In the 8. experiment a higher recovery resulted a little 
bit higher level of impurities in the product, but the 
quality still met the requirements. 

Conclusion 

The quasi-continuous elution chromatographic 
purification of a steroid active compound was possible 
to carry out successfully with the help of the rotating 
switching valve of a laboratory-scale Simulated Moving 
Bed (SMB) instrument. The quality of the product, 
gained at optimum operating conditions met the purity 
requirements (purity > 99 %, maximum level of 
individual impurities < 0.3 %). 

The main advantage of applying this quasi-
continuous separation method is that the staff need for 
processing is less, than in case of batch elution 
chromatographic separation. Fraction collector is not 
needed, because cutting is done automatically by 
switching the columns and the main fractions coming 
from successive columns can be pooled in one vessel. 

Comparing the specific capacity parameters of the 
quasi-continuous process with the batch pilot-scale 
separation, the specific solvent consumption is higher 
and the productivity is lower. But mention must be 
made, that the number of columns applied in the SMB 
instrument were eight instead of the necessary five 
because of the construction of the SMB unit. The 
columns applied in the SMB instrument were shorter 
than the pilot-scale column, so the theoretical plate 
number of these columns was considerably lower, 
therefore the specific sample load also had to be lower. 
(In case of pilot-scale column the specific sample load 
was 0.02 [g sample g-1 packing material], while in 

quasi-continuous process it was only 0.0143 [g sample 
g-1 packing material].) 

The robustness of the process demands the 
uniformity of columns inserted in the SMB instrument. 

The change of temperature has strong impact on the 
adsorption behaviour of compounds, therefore transients 
in temperature can detrimentally influence the 
separation. 

SYMBOLS 

I.D. Internal diameter 
F Feed 
c Concentration of the compounds 
R Raffinate 
E Extract 
L Liquid recycle 
D Fresh solvent 
P “Recycle of the packing”, column switching 

time 

INDICES 

W Less retained compound 
S More retained compound 
F Feed 
R Raffinate 
E Extract 



 

 

20

REFERENCES 

1. MANN G. (1998) Analusis 26 (7): 76-82 
2. COLIN H. (1998) Analusis 26 (7): 15-17 
3. KATTI A. M., JAGLAND P. (1998) Analusis 26 (7): 

38-46 
4. A. SEIDEL-MORGENSTERN (1998) Analusis 26 (7): 

46-55 
5. GRILL C. M., MILLER L., YAN T. Q. (2004) J 

Chromatography A 1026: 101-108 
6. NICOUD R.-M. (1999) Pharmaceutical Technology 

Europe 11: 36-44 
7. CHARTON F., NICOUD R.-M. (1995) J 

Chromatography A 702: 97-112 
8. KHATTABI S., CHERRAK D. E., MIHLBACHLER K., 

GUIOCHON G. (2000) J Chromatography A 893: 
307-319 

9. PEDEFERRI M., ZENONI G., MAZZOTTI M., 
MORBIDELLI M. (1999) Chem Eng Sci 54: 3735-
3748 

10. LEE H.-J., XIE Y., KOO Y.-M., WANG N.-H. L. 
(2004) Biotechnol Prog 20: 179-192 

11. SANTOS M. A. G., VEREDAS V., SILVA JR. I. J., 
CORREIA C. R. D., FURLAN L. T., SANTANA C. C. 
(2004) Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 
21 (1): 127-136 

12. TEMESVÁRI K., ARANYI A., CSUKÁS B., BALOGH S. 
(2004) Chromatographia Suppl. 60: 189-199 

13. NICOUD R.-M., BAILLY M. (1992) Proceedings of 
“PREP 92”, NANCY (France), 6-8 April, ISBN 2-
905267-18-6: 205-220 

14. BLEHAUT J., NICOUD R.-M. (1998) Analusis 26 (7): 
60-70 

15. GUIOCHON G. (2002) J Chromatography A 965: 
129-161 

16. HIMBERT F., PENNANEC R., GUILLAUMET G., 
LAFOSSE M. (2004) Chromatographia 60: 269-274 

17. YANG X., LIU K., XIE M. (1998) J Chromatography 
A 813: 201-204 

18. ZHANG X., GEOFFROY P., MIESCH M., JULIEN-DAVID 
D., RAUL F., AOUDÉ-WERNER D., MARCHIONI E. 
(2005) Steroids ‘in press’ 

19. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2005.06.003 
20. HEITMANN D., ZIEHR H., MÜTHING J. (1998) J 

Chromatography B 710: 1-8