Microsoft Word - contents.doc


HUNGARIAN JOURNAL 
OF INDUSTRY AND CHEMISTRY 

VESZPRÉM 
Vol. 40(1) pp. 25–31 (2012) 

APPLICATION OF IMPROVED BIO-PARAFFINS IN DIESEL FUELS 

T. KASZA1, CS. TÓTH2, J. HANCSÓK2  

1MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Plc., Százhalombatta, HUNGARY 
2University of Pannonia, MOL Department of Hydrocarbon and Coal Processing, 10 Egyetem Str., Veszprém, HUNGARY 

E-mail: hancsokj@almos.uni-pannon.hu 

Bio-paraffin containing mixtures produced from different natural triglycerides (conventional and improved vegetable 
oils, used cooking oils and fats, etc.) have high cetane number (95-105 units), but their freezing points are high (between 
+15 and +32°C). This property can be improved by catalytic hydroisomerization. Products obtained over 0.5% Pt/SAPO-11 
catalysts (T = 280–380°C; P = 20–80 bar; LHSV = 0.25–4.0 h-1; apparent contact time: between 1/3 and 4.0 h (at 
LHSV = 3.0 h-1; H2/feedstock = 400 Nm

3/m3) had CFPP values of +5°C; -20°C and -32°C. At the same time, there was 
decreased cetane number of the isomerates (87, 70 and 65 unit, respectively) relative to the feedstock. These biogasoils 
are suitable for bio-components of premium quality diesel fuel or for the improvement of cetane number. They can also 
reduce the density of low grade components providing some economic savings and some flexibility to refineries. 

Keywords: biogasoils, biofuels, cetane number, cold flow properties 

Introduction 

The energy demand of the world is continuously 
increasing because of the industrial development and 
the population growth. Because of these and the 
environmental advantages, the importance of different 
bio fuels is significant nowadays [1–3] through the 
energy policy of the European Union. Its aim is to 
decrease the energy and oil dependency. To inspire the 
utilization of bio fuels 2003/30/EC, and then 2009/28/EC 
directives were created specifying the recommended 
and compulsory share of bio-components in the 
transportation fuels. 

Currently, mainly the biodiesels (mixtures of methyl 
esters) are used as Diesel fuel blending components, 
which have numerous performance disadvantages; for 
example, their oxidation and heat stability is poor 
because of the great number of olefinic bonds [3–10]. 
Water content and the hydrolysis of ester bonds brings 
about corrosion problems [3, 7, 8] resulting in poor 
storage stability [3–6]. In addition, because of the good 
conductivity, corrosion may damage the metallic parts. 
Furthermore, the solving nature may cause 
compatibility problems with plastic construction 
materials [7–12]. Due to these disadvantages, the 
maintenance costs are higher, and the lifetime of the 
engine is shorter [10]. Because of the lower energy 
content the fuel consumption is higher [9–13]. The 
combustion characteristics differ from those of diesel 
fuels (ignition delay, adiabatic flame temperature, 
radiation heat loss, etc.), the NOx emission is higher 
[9, 13–16], and the aldehyde emission is also higher 
[13]. In addition, the cold filter plugging point is higher 
[10, 15]. They have inadequate compatibility with 

lubricating oils [10]. The after-treatment catalysts may 
be damaged by alkali and/or alkaline earth metals and 
phosphorus present in fatty oils [7]. The production costs 
are also higher than for diesel fuels [6, 17, 18]. For these 
reasons, car manufacturers recommend the blending 
concentration of the fatty acid methyl esters by 7.0 v/v% 
in the European Union in accordance with the EN 
590:2009 standard. At the same time, up to 2020 the 
European Union prescribed to use 10% of bio origin 
components in fuels. 

Accordingly, the production of fuels having a 
preferable chemical structure from different triglyceride 
containing feedstocks (e.g. oils of conventional and 
ennobled plants, used frying oils and animal fats, algae 
oils, fats from meat and leather industry, so called 
brown grease from the sewage farms, etc.) has an 
important role in reaching the purposes of the 
mentioned directives [19]. 

A promising solution is the fuel purpose catalytic 
hydrogenation of these triglycerides. The utilization of 
these products is already supported by the CWA 
15940:2009 standard. For this mainly sulfided transition 
metal(s) (Ni, Co, Mo, W) containing catalysts having 
high heteroatom removal activity are suggested [19–24]. 

During the catalytic hydrogenation of triglycerides, 
mainly normal paraffins and some iso-paraffins generate 
beside the formation of propane, carbon oxides (CO2, 
CO), water, and oxygenic compounds according to 
Figure 1 [19]. 

There are two main approaches to the hydrogenation 
of triglycerides: co-processing or stand-alone catalytic 
conversion. The co-processing systems require only 
slight changes in the existing HDS units, which cost 
only a few percent of refinery installation costs. 



 

 

26

CH C

O

O R2

C
O

CH2 O R1

CH2 C

O

O R3

catalyst

H2, T, P
n-paraffins i-paraffins+

By-products:   CO +  CO2  +  CH4  +  C3H8  +  H2O
+ oxygen containing products  

Figure 1: General reaction scheme of the hydrogenation 
of triglycerides 

 
During the co-processing of gasoil – triglyceride 

mixtures in a two-step process biogasoil containing 
gasoils can be produced with improved cetane number 
and suitable cold flow properties [20]. In the case of 
stand-alone systems the investment costs are higher 
compared to co-processing systems, but there is higher 
control on the process and higher product quality can be 
realized [21]. In this study biogasoils produced in such a 
stand-alone system are considered. The stand-alone 
produced, stabilized biogasoils have good heat and storage 
stability and outstanding cetane number (95-105). But 
their freezing points are high (between +15 and +32°C); 
accordingly to their cold filter plugging points (CFPP), 
they cannot satisfy either the summer grade 
specification of the temperate zone (at most +5°C) or 
the winter grade specifications (at most – 20°C). 
Therefore their molecular structure has to be modified 
in order to that the CFPP value fulfill the standard 
specification.  

For this purpose, the most suitable technology is the 
isomerization as the freezing point of the branching 
paraffins is lower by 20–40°C than that of the normal 
paraffins having the same carbon number. To reach 
favourable yields, high activity and selectivity catalysts 
should be used. These kinds of catalysts can be the 10-
member-ring zeolites (e.g. ZSM-22, ZSM-23) and zeolite 
analogues (SAPO-11, SAPO-31, SAPO-41) containing 
different noble metals (Pt, Pd) [25–27]. 

During the hydroisomerization, the convenient 
selection of the operational parameters is very important 
because of the favourable yield and composition, as wel 
as because of the disadvantageous effects on the catalyst 
activity. Accordingly, the goal of our experiments was 
the investigation of the effects of the process parameters 
(temperature: 280–400°C, pressure: 5–80 bar, liquid 
hourly space velocity (LHSV): 0.5-4.0 h-1, H2/ 
hydrocarbon ratio: 200–800 Nm3/m3) on the yield and 
product quality during the isomerization of normal 
paraffin mixture produced from sunflower oil. 
Furthermore, we compared the performance properties 
of the produced biogasoils with those of fossil gasoils. 

Experimental Section 

Apparatus 

The experiments were carried out in an apparatus 
containing a tubular down-flow reactor of 100 cm3 
effective volume. It contains all the equipment and 

devices applied in the reactor system of an industrial 
heterogeneous catalytic plant [3]. The experiments were 
carried out in continuous operation with steady-state 
activity catalyst. 

Materials 

During our heterogenic catalytic experiments, a normal 
paraffin mixture (CFPP = 23°C; hydrocarbons: C17-: 
6.3%, i-C17: 0.3%, n-C17: 46.7%, i-C18: 0.4%, n-C18: 
43.3%, C19+: 2.0%, content of oxygenic compounds: 
0.06%, oxygen content : 68 mg/kg) produced with high 
yield (84.8%; which is relatively high regarding the 
theoretically highest yield, which is about 86.2% in the 
case of sunflower oil, which could change as a function of 
the oleic acid composition of the used triglyceride) from 
Hungarian sunflower oil over commercial hydrotreating 
NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts was used as a base feedstock. The 
0.5% Pt/SAPO-11 catalyst was prepared as described 
and characterized according to HU 225 912 patent. 

Methods 

The properties of the feedstock and the products were 
analyzed according to EU and ASTM standards and GC 
(Shimadzu 2010 GC) and GC-MS (HP 6980A). The 
oxygen content of the feedstock and products was 
determined by CHNS/O analysis. 

The crystal structure of the catalyst and its change 
during the experiments were determined by X-ray 
diffraction (XRD). XRD data were collected by 
Siemens D500 equipment, Philips PW 1730/10 (PW 
1050/70 goniometer) diffractometer, CuKα (40 kV, 
35 mA) ray were applied. The XRD characterization of 
the obtained powder confirmed that it was SAPO-11. 
The synthesized SAPO-11 microporous molecular sieve 
was impregnated with Pt(NH3)4Cl2 solution. The 
platinum content was determined according to the UOP-
274 standard. The platinum dispersion was determined 
by H2 chemisorption [29], which was 91%. The surface 
properties of the catalyst were determined by ASAP 
2000 equipment (Micromeritics) (pore range of 1.7–300 nm) 
and mercury penetration method using CARLO-ERBA 
equipment (pore range 7.5–15000 nm). The specific 
surface area of the catalyst was 100.1 m2/g. The acidity 
was determined by ammonium adsorption, which was 
0.66 mmol NH3/g. Prior to the activity measurements 
the catalysts were pre-treated in situ, as described in our 
earlier publication [3]. 

Results and Discussion 

The experiments were carried out in a wide range of 
process parameters (T = 280–380°C; P = 20–80 bar; 
LHSV = 0.25–4.0 h-1; apparent contact time: between 1/3 
and 4.0 h (at LHSV = 3.0 h-1). Our aim was to find a 
combination where the liquid yield is at least 90% 
similarly to the industrially required yield. It is 



 

 

27

necessary to avoid the fast deactivation because of the 
significant cracking and industrially at least 90–95% 
liquid yield is required. According to our pre-
experiments using practically heteroatom free (lower 
than 10 mgS/kg) feedstocks, it was concluded that the 
increase of the platinum content increased the isoparaffin 
content of the products significantly up to 0.5%. It was 
because the increase of the number of the hydrogenation-
dehydrogenation active sites promoted the isomerization 
reactions and the prompt hydrogenation of the 
intermediate carbenium ions as a consequence inhibited 
their cracking. The further increase of the platinum 
content had only insignificant effects [30, 31]. 
Consequently, the platinum content of the applied 
Pt/SAPO-11 was 0.5%. 

Product yield and composition 

During the systematic isomerization of the practically 
heteroatom-free normal paraffin mixture, the products 
were separated to gas and liquid phases. The gas 
products taken from the top of the separator contained 
mainly hydrogen and light hydrocarbons generated in 
the hydrocracking reactions. These hydrocarbons were 
mainly normal and isobutane (higher than 40% of the 
light hydrocarbons) which could be used in the oil 
industry for several purposes (e.g. LPG production, 
alkylation of i-C4 with olefins, dehydrogenation of i-C4 
to isobutylene, etc.) [32]. The target product contained 
the C11 and heavier hydrocarbons beside which C5-C10 
valuable side products were also generated in a small 
quantity. 

The yield of the target products decreased by 
increasing the temperature; this effect was intensified by 
decreasing the LHSV (Figure 2). The reason of this was 
that the chain breaking of the unstable carbenium ions 
could happen easily at higher temperature on the 
catalyst surface; furthermore, the lower the flow rate of 
the molecule was the higher the contact time was and 
the higher the possibility of the cracking was. 

 

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

270 290 310 330 350 370 390 410

P
ro

du
ct

 y
ie

ld
, %

Temperature, °C

LSHV = 0.5 1/h
LSHV = 0.75 1/h
LSHV = 1.0 1/h
LSHV = 2.0 1/h
LSHV = 4.0 1/h

 
Figure 2: Product yields as a function of the 

temperature and the LHSV  
(P = 40 bar, H2/feedstock ratio = 400 Nm3/m3) 

 
The yield of the products decreased by decreasing 

the pressure in the investigated pressure range  
(20–80 bar) because the partial pressure of the 
hydrocarbons increased resulting in a lower degree of 
hydrogenation of the instable carbenium ions, thus 

increasing the possibility of the cracking. The product 
yield also decreased by decreasing the hydrogen/ 
hydrocarbon ratio similarly to the decrease of the total 
pressure, because of the rising cracking. It was 
especially dominant below 400 Nm3/m3. 

Increasing the contact time by reacting again and 
again the paraffin rich mixture at 360°C, 40 bar, and 
LHSV of 3.0 h-1, (where the cracking selectivity is 
relatively low) the yield continuously decreased, since 
more and more polybranched paraffins were generated 
(see Figure 6), which are more susceptible to cracking 
than normal and monobranched paraffins. 

The isoparaffin content of the product increased 
significantly above 300°C by increasing the temperature, 
but it started to decrease at about 360°C partly because 
of the thermodynamic inhibition (as the isomerization 
reactions are exothermic), partly because of the better 
approach of the thermodynamic equilibrium, and partly 
because of the cracking reactions (Figure 3). 

 

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90

270 290 310 330 350 370 390 410

Is
op

ar
af

fi
n 

co
nt

en
t, 

%

Temperature, °C

LSHV = 0.5 1/h
LSHV = 0.75 1/h
LSHV = 1.0 1/h
LSHV = 2.0 1/h
LSHV = 4.0 1/h

 
Figure 3: The isoparaffin content of the products as a 

function of the temperature and LSHV  
(P = 40 bars, H2/feedstock ratio = 400 Nm3/m3) 

 
Up to about 360°C, mainly (>85%) mono branched 

paraffins were generated, whose significant part (>98%) 
was mono-methyl-paraffins. It was because, in the case 
of the 10-member ring zeolites, only a small amount of 
isoparaffins having alkyl chain of more than one carbon 
number can form due to the steric inhibition [33]. Their 
freezing points are more favourable than those of the 
normal paraffins, and their cetane number is high enough 
(Figure 4). 

 

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

C
et

an
e 

nu
m

be
r

Carbon number

n-paraffins

mono-branched paraffins

multi-branched paraffins

 
Figure 4: Cetane number of the paraffins as a function 

of the carbon number [34] 
 
However, above 360°C a significant amount (15–35%) 

of multi-branched paraffins formed, which also have 
favourable cold flow properties, but their cetane number 



 

 

28

is low (e.g. 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane: freezing 
point: 0°C, cetane number: 15 unit). This effect was 
increased by decreasing the LHSV (Fig. 3). 

Up to 340°C, the concentration of isoparaffins 
increased by decreasing the pressure to 20 bar, because 
by decreasing the hydrogen pressure the conversion of 
hydrocarbons could be increased. But above 360°C the 
increase of the pressure to 50 bar was favourable, 
because the partial pressure of the hydrogen could roll 
back the cracking reactions (Figure 5). 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Is
op

ar
af

fi
n 

co
nt

en
t, 

%

Pressure, bar

320°C 340°C 360°C 380°C 400°C

 
Figure 5: The isoparaffin content of the products as a 

function of the pressure and the temperature 
(LHSV = 1.0 h-1, H2/feedstock ratio = 400 Nm3/m3) 

 
At 360°C, which was favourable regarding both the 

yield and the isoparaffins content, at least 400 Nm3/m3 
H2/feedstock volume ratio was necessary to reach a high 
isoparaffin content. In the case of lower values, the 
concentration of the isoparaffins was decreased by the 
hydrocracking reactions. 

Increasing the apparent contact time (number of runs 
multiplied by 1/LHSV), the isoparaffin content of the 
product continuously increased by reacting again and 
again the paraffin rich mixture in the reactor (at 360°C, 
40 bar and LHSV of 3.0 h-1). At the apparent contact 
time of 2.0 h [= 6 x 1/(3.0 h-1)] the isoparaffin content 
exceeded 90%. Further increase of the conversion 
increased only the concentration of polybranched 
paraffins (Fig. 6). 

 

9.77

7.10

4.25

3.18
2.64 2.38

2.06 1.85 1.56 1.41 1.29 1.21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.33 0.67 1.00 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 3.33 3.67 4.00

Is
op

ar
af

fin
 c

on
te

nt
 o

f t
he

 p
ro

du
ct

, %

Apparent contact time, h

Concentration of monobranched paraffins, %
Concentration fo polybranched paraffins, %
Ratio of mono/polybranched paraffins

 
Figure 6: The mono- and polybranched isoparaffin in 
the products as a function of the apparent contact time 

Performance properties 

The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) of the products 
having gasoil boiling range decreased by increasing the 

concentration of the isoparaffins. At relatively low 
conversion of n-paraffins (<30%), the CFPP decreased 
only some units (Figure 7). It was because the resolvent 
effect of isoparaffins could not inhibit the formation and 
growing of n-paraffin crystals. At higher conversion, 
not only the higher isoparaffin concentration improved 
the value of CFPP, but the formation of lower carbon 
number molecules generating mainly at higher than 
70% of conversion by the cracking of polybranched 
paraffins. Accordingly, the CFPP value of the products 
can satisfy not only the winter specification of the 
temperature zone, but the specification valid in the 
arctic zone (-20°C; -26°C; -32°C and -38°C) as well. 

 

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

C
ol

d 
fi

lt
er

 p
lu

gg
in

g 
po

in
t,

 °
C

C
et

an
e 

nu
m

be
r

Conversion of n-paraffins, %

Cetane number

Cold filter plugging point, °C

 
Figure 7: The cold filter plugging point and the cetane 
number of the products as a function of the n-paraffin 

conversion  
(T = 360°C; P = 40 bar; H2/feedstock ratio = 400 Nm3/m3) 

 
The cetane number of the products decreased as a 

function of the conversion (Fig. 7) relative to that of the 
feedstock (101 unit), as the mono-methyl paraffins and 
polybranched paraffins have lower cetane numbers  
(60–75 and 40–65 unit, respectively) than those of the 
normal paraffins (90–110 unit) [34]. The cetane numbers 
of the products having improved cold flow properties 
(satisfying at least the summer grade specification) were 
between 65-86 unit, which is significantly higher than 
the specified value (51 unit) of the current Diesel fuel 
standard (EN 590:2009 + A1:2010).  

While the viscosity of the obtained biogasoils was in 
the range of 2.5–3.5 mm2/s meeting the specification, 
the density could not provide direct blending as it was in 
the range of 0.772–0.782 g/cm3 underachieving the 
expected 0.820 g/cm3 (Figure 8). 

 

0,764

0,766

0,768

0,770

0,772

0,774

0,776

0,778

0,780

0,782

0,784

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

0 20 40 60 80 100

D
en

si
ty

, g
/c

m
3

K
in

em
at

ic
 v

is
co

si
ty

, 
m

m
2 /

s

Conversion of n-paraffins, %

Viscosity (40°C)
Density (40°C)

 
Figure 8: The viscosity and density of the products as a 

function of the n-paraffin conversion  
(T = 360°C; P = 40 bar; H2/feedstock ratio = 400 Nm3/m3) 



 

 

29

Utilization possibilities of biogasoils 

Since biogasoils consist of purely normal and isoparaffins, 
they have more preferable chemical structures than 
biodiesels. Accordingly, they can eliminate the above 
disadvantages having an important role in reaching the 
purposes of the mentioned directives. 

Furthermore, these products are excellent Diesel fuel 
blending components, as they are practically free of 
sulfur and aromatic compounds, and burn exceptionally 
clearly. Accordingly, biogasoils can be used for premium 
quality diesel fuels or using these low density products 
could provide some economic savings and some 
flexibility for crude refineries in case of blending of 
gasoils having high aromatic content and low cetane 
number. 

We note that during the production of these 
improved products the yield decreases. Furthermore, the 
usability of isoparaffin rich Jet and gasoline fractions 
has to be considered as well. 

Biogasoils as blending components of premium quality 
diesel fuels 

Regarding the production costs, the feedstock price 
(Figure 9) of biogasoils, which is the most significant 
cost of bio-fuels, can be lower than that of biodiesels 
since (as it was mentioned) they can be produced from a 
broader base of feedstock. On the other hand, the 
installation cost of a biogasoil plant can be higher than 
that of a biodiesel plant because of the relatively high 
price of the hydrogenation catalysts and the pressurized 
equipment. Regarding the operational costs, the hydrogen 
consumption represents one of the highest items in the 
case of biogasoils. However, because of the high 
exothermic nature of the hydrogenation reactions, 
biogasoil production has a net steam production 
capability, which can be utilized effectively in a 
refinery. To sum it up, biogasoils can be competitive 
with biodiesels regarding only the costs, while they 
excel those performance properties. 

 

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

M
on

fl
y 

pr
ic

e 
of

 v
eg

et
ab

le
 o

ils
, $

/m
3

Sunflower oil
Rapeseed oil
Palm oil
Soybean oil

 
Figure 9: The monthly price of vegetable oils [35] 
 
Comparing only the current product price of 

biogasoils with that of low sulphur diesel gasoils  
(950-1050 $/t), biogasoils can hardly compete because of 

the high feedstock price (800–1400 $/m3 ≈ 850–1450 $/t). 
Considering the performance properties as well, the 
competitiveness of biogasoils seems to be more 
favorable, since the production of gasoils with CFPP 
value of -20°C or lower can be realized with some yield 
loss and significant extra costs. In addition to the 
production of gasoils with biodiesel content, the CFPP 
value can be a further challenge (CFPP of biodiesels is 
in the range of -5°C and +5°C depending on the 
feedstock) [6]. Consequently, a high amount of 
additives has to be used. On the other hand, biogasoils 
having low density and excellent cold flow properties 
may have a positive effect on the cold flow properties of 
gasoils, therefore, they might improve the economy of 
premium gasoil production. 

Biogasoils used for quality improvement of gasoils 
having low cetane number and high density 

In order to increase the profitability refineries try to 
increase the distillate yield, especially the diesel yield. 
Some of the easier options are that the refineries can 
consider crude selection, cut points, operating modes, 
and catalysts. For further distillate yield improvement, 
such technologies should be used that break or crack 
larger, higher boiling point components into smaller, 
lower boiling point components. These options require 
capital investment and higher operating costs [36, 37]. 

As an alternative option, many European refineries 
try to change the FCC unit for increased distillate 
production using new catalyst formulations with better 
cracking capabilities [37]. However, the blending of 
light cycle oil (LCO) having gasoil boiling range into 
diesel pool requires further processing as it generally 
has a high aromatic content (65–75%), low cetane 
number (15–25), and a relatively high sulfur content 
(100–1000 mg/kg). During the processing of relatively 
low value (650–700 $/t) LCO, the hydrogen consumption 
is significant (20–25 kg/t); the cetane number can be 
improved reasonably up to about 30–35 unit. In the case 
of biogasoil production, hydrogen consumption is 
similar, approximately 20–25 kg/t as a function of the 
feedstock composition, but the cetane number is in the 
range of 65–86 unit. 

Experiments showed that during the blending of 
biogasoils into gasoils the physical-chemical properties 
and the cetane number change almost linearly as a 
function of the biogasoil content in the gasoil [38]. 
These data correlated well with our results. We used 
an obtained biogasoil product (CFPP = -12°C; cetane 
number: 74.3) and a conventional light cyclic oil. The 
main properties of the blended mixture are 
summarized in Table 1. 

As the data of Table 1 show different blends 
obtained by the admixture of a low density, high cetane 
number biogasoil and a high density, low cetane number 
light cyclic oil meets the specification of the diesel 
standard. 

 



 

 

30

Table. 1. Main properties and the estimated production cost of mixtures of a biogasoil and a light cyclic oil 

Biogasoil and light cyclic oil mixtures 
Property Biogasoil 

80:20 60:40 50:50 40:60 20:80 
Hydrotreated 

LCO 

Density, g/cm3 0.777 0.808 0.838 0.854 0.869 0.899 0.930 
Cetane number 74.3 65.8 57.3 53.1 48.9 40.4 32.0 

CFPP, °C -12 -9 -6 -4 -3 0 3 
Production cost, $/t 1500 1350 1200 1125 1050 900 750 

 
The CFPP value of the obtained mixture was more 

favourable than that of the LCO. Accordingly, the 
quality of the LCO improved with biogasoil can be a 
suitable gasoil blending component. Mixtures containing 
40-60% biogasoil as a blending component have a 
production cost – depending on the price of the 
feedstock – competitive with the production cost of 
diesel fuels. 

Conclusion 

The 0.5%Pt/SAPO-11 catalyst is suitable for the 
isomerization of normal paraffin-rich mixtures produced 
from natural triglycerides in order to improve the cold 
flow properties. The products have outstanding cetane 
number and are excellent Diesel fuel blending 
components, as they are practically free of sulphur and 
aromatic compounds, and burn exceptionally clearly.  

Accordingly, they are suitable for bio-components of 
premium quality diesel fuel. Using these biogasoils for 
the improvement of cetane number and the reductions in 
density could provide some economic savings and some 
flexibility to refineries (e.g. economical application of 
light cyclic oil of FCC units). 

Acknowledgement 

This work was supported by the European Union and 
co-financed by the European Social Fund in the frame 
of the TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0003 and 
TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0025 projects. 

REFERENCES 

1. A. DEMIRBAS: Political, economic and 
environmental impacts of biofuels: A review, 
Applied energy, 86 (2009) pp. 108–117 

2. A. P. C. FAAIJ: Bio-energy in Europe: changing 
technology choices, Energy Policy, 34 (2006)  
pp. 322–342 

3. J. HANCSÓK, M. KRÁR, SZ. MAGYAR, L. BODA, 
A. HOLLÓ, D. KALLÓ: Investigation of the 
production of high cetane number bio gas oil from 
pre-hydrogenated vegetable oils over Pt/HZSM-
22/Al2O3, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 
101 (2007) pp. 148–152 

4. M. MITTELBACH, C. REMSCHMIDT: Biodiesel the 
comprehensive handbook, Martin Mittelbach 
Publisher, Graz (2004) 

5. G. KNOTHE, J. VAN GERPEN, J. KRAHL: The 
Biodiesel Handbook, The American Oil Chemists’ 
Society Publishing, Champaign, USA (2005) 

6. A. E. ATABANI, A. S. SILITONGA, I. S. BADRUDDIN, 
T. M. I. MAHLIA, H. H. MASJUKI, S. MEKHILEF: A 
comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative 
energy resource and its characteristics, Renew. Sust. 
Energ. Rev., 16 (2012) pp. 2070–2093 

7. M. CANAKCI, H. SANLI: Biodiesel production from 
various feedstocks and their effects on the fuel 
properties, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot., 35(5) (2008)  
pp. 431–441 

8. I. M. ATADASHI, M. K. AROUA, A. R. ABDUL AZIZ, 
N. M. N. SULAIMAN: The effects of water on 
biodiesel production and refining technologies: A 
review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16 (2012)  
pp. 3456–3470 

9. E. BAKEAS, G. KARAVALAKIS, S. STOURNAS: 
Biodiesel emissions profile in modern diesel 
vehicles, Part 1: Effect of biodiesel origin on the 
criteria emissions. Sci. Total. Environ., 409 (2011) 
pp. 1670–1676 

10. M. A. FAZAL, A. S. M. A. HASEEB, H. H. MASJUKI: 
Biodiesel feasibility study: An evaluation of 
material compatibility; performance; emission and 
engine durability. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 15 
(2011) pp. 1314–1324 

11. A. S. M. A. HASEEB, M. A. FAZAL, M. I. JAHIRUL, 
H. H. MASJUKI: Compatibility of automotive 
materials in biodiesel: A review, Fuel, 90 (2011)  
pp. 922–931 

12. M. A. FAZAL, A. S. M. A. HASEEB, H. H. MASJUKI: 
Effect of different corrosion inhibitors on the 
corrosion of cast iron in palm biodiesel, Fuel 
Process, Technol., 92 (2011) pp. 2154–2159 

13. J. XUE, T. E. GRIFT, A. C. HANSEN: Effect of 
biodiesel on engine performances and emissions, 
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 15 (2011) pp. 1098–1116 

14. M. LAPUERTA, O. ARMAS, J. RODRÍGUEZ-FERNÁNDEZ: 
Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions, 
Prog. Energy. Combust., 34(2) (2008) pp. 198–223 

15. C. C. ENWEREMADU, H. L. RUTTO: Combustion, 
emission and engine performance characteristics of 
used cooking oil biodiesel – A review. Renew. Sust. 
Energ. Rev., 14 (2010) 2863–2873. 



 

 

31

16. HOEKMAN, S. K., ROBBINS, C.: Review of the 
effects of biodiesel on NOx emissions, Fuel 
Process, Technol., 96 (2012) pp. 237–249 

17. H. C. ONG, T. M. I. MAHLIA, H. H. MASJUKI, 
D. HONNERY: Life cycle cost and sensitivity 
analysis of palm biodiesel production, Fuel, 98 
(2012) pp. 131–139 

18. J. M. MARCHETTI: The effect of economic variables 
over a biodiesel production plant, Energy Conversi. 
Manage., 52 (2011) pp. 3227–3233 

19. M. KRÁR, A. THERNESZ, CS. TÓTH, T. KASZA, 
J. HANCSÓK: Investigation of catalytic conversion 
of vegetable oil/gas oil mixtures. Silica and 
Silicates in Modern Catalysis, Transworld Research 
Network (2010) pp. 435–455 

20. CS. TÓTH, T. KASZA, J. HANCSÓK: Production of 
diesel fuel by hydroisomerization of co-processed 
vegetable oil – gas oil mixtures. 15th Nordic 
Symposium on Catalysis, Mariehamn, Åland, 
Finnland, June 10–12, 2012 

21. H. AATOLA, M. LARMI, T. SARJOVAARA, 
S. MIKKONEN: Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) 
as a Renewable Diesel Fuel: Trade-off between 
NOx, Particulate Emission, and Fuel Consumption 
of a Heavy Duty Engine, www.nesteoil.com,  
letöltés ideje: 2012. 10. 31. 

22. G. W. HUBER, A. CORMA: Synergies between Bio- 
and oil refineries for the production of fuels from 
biomass, Angewandte Chemie International 
Edition, 46 (2007) pp. 7184–7201 

23. D. KUBIČKA: Future refining catalysis – introduction 
of biomass feedstocks, Collect. Czech. Chem. 
Commun., 73 (2008) pp. 1015–1044 

24. J. HANCSÓK, T. KASZA, S. KOVÁCS, P. SOLYMOSI, 
A. HOLLÓ: Production of bioparaffins by the 
catalytic hydrogenation of natural triglycerides, 
Journal of Cleaner Production, 34 (2012) pp. 76–81 

25. H. DELDARI: Suitable catalysts for hydroisomerization 
of long-chain normal paraffins, Applied Catalysis 
A: General, 293 (2005) pp. 1–10 

26. K. C. PARK, S. K. IHM: Comparison of Pt/zeolite 
catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroisomerization, 
Applied Catalysis A: General, 203 (2000)  
pp. 201–209 

27. C. PEREGO: Micro- and mesoporous materials for 
sustainable energy, 16th International Zeolite 
Conference – 7th International Mesostructured 
Materials Symposium, KN-8, July 4-9 (2010) Italy, 
Sorrento 

28. J. HANCSÓK, S. KOVÁCS, GY. PÖLCZMANN, 
T. KASZA: Investigation the effect of oxygenic 
compounds on the isomerisation of bioparaffins 
over Pt/SAPO-11, Topics in Catalysis, 54 (2011) 
pp. 1094–1101 

29. J. HANCSÓK, G. GÁRDOS, M. BAUMANN: Hungarian 
Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 17 (1989) pp. 131–137 

30. T. KASZA, A. HOLLÓ, A. THERNESZ, J. HANCSÓK: 
Production of bio gas oil from bioparaffins over 
Pt/SAPO-11. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 
21 (2010) pp. 1225–1230 

31. J. HANCSÓK, M. KRÁR, SZ. MAGYAR, L. BODA, 
A. HOLLÓ, D. KALLÓ: Investigation of the 
production of high quality biogasoil from 
prehydrogenated vegetable oils over Pt/SAPO-
11/Al2O3, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 
170 (2007) pp. 1605–1610 

32. T. KASZA, J. HANCSÓK: Investigation of fuel 
components produced by the isomerization of bio-
paraffin mixtures, Hungarian Journal of Industrial 
Chemistry, 39(1) (2011) pp. 121–126 

33. J. A. MARTENS, M. TIELEN, P. A. JACOBS, 
J. WEITKAMP: Estimation of the void structure and 
pore dimensions of molecular sieve zeolites using 
the hydroconversion of n-decane, Zeolites, 4 (1984) 
pp. 98–107 

34. M. J. MURPHY, J. D. TAYLOR, R. L. MCCORMICK: 
Compendium of Experimental Cetane Number 
Data, Subcontractor report, National Renewable 
Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-540-36805, 2004. 

35. http://www.indexmundi.com/, October, 2012 
36. D. GIBBONS: Naphtha to diesel via novel routes – 

An unconventional, synthetic approach to 
converting LPG and naphtha components could 
boost diesel production, Petroleum Technology 
Quarterly (2011) Q3, pp. 27–33 

37. R. KARLIN, A. MACRIS, R. ADARME, K. WU: Flexible 
solution for increased diesel production, Petroleum 
Technology Quarterly (2009) Q4, pp. 27–42 

38. M. LAPUERTA, M. VILLAJOS, J. R. AGUDELO, 
A. L. BOEHMAN: Key properties and blending 
strategies of hydrotreated vegetable oil as biofuel 
for diesel engines, Fuel Processing Technology, 92 
(2011) pp. 2406–2411