Microsoft Word - szolcs_eloszo.doc HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY VESZPRÉM Vol. 32. pp. 23-31 (2004) INVESTIGATION OF REVERSE PHASE SMB-CHROMATOGRAPHIC BIOSEPARATIONS OF AMINO ACID AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS Z. MOLNÁR1, M. NAGY1, A. ARANYI2, L. HANÁK1, T. SZÁNYA1 and J. ARGYELÁN1 1University of Veszprém, Department of Chemical Engineering, H-8201 Veszprém, P.O.Box 158, HUNGARY; Fax number: +36 88 421 905 e-mail: hmolnar78@freemail.hu 2Gedeon Richter Pharmaceutical Works, H-1475 Budapest, P.O.Box. 27, HUNGARY The authors investigated amino acid aqueous solutions as model system for the purpose of studying reverse phase chromatographic bioseparation. Desalting of DL-β-phenylalanine was studied on a small-laboratory scale simulated moving bed (SMB) preparative liquid chromatograph (number of columns=6, column length=125mm, column I.D.=13mm). DIAION HP20 polymeric adsorbent resin was used for the reverse phase chromatography. The feed (sample) of the SMB equipment is 3.5g DL-β-phenylalanine/dm3 and 58.5g sodium-chloride/dm3 aqueous solution. With the three zones opened loop SMB with 2-2-2 column configuration can amino acid product be achieved with less than 50ppm NaCl in crystal form after evaporation. Later a large laboratory scale (number of columns=4, column length=500mm, column ID=50mm) automatized SMB equipment was constructed. The applied model system for bioseparation contains glycine (1.5g/dm3), L-phenylalanine (3.3g/dm3) in water and SEPABEADS SP825 adsorbent. Both L-phenylalanine and glycine were produced in more than 99.9% m/m purity and 99% yield at productivity 3.7-9.5mg/(g adsorbent h) in case of three zones open loop 2-1-1 column configuration. The SMB experiments were simulated with the help of equilibrium cascade model. The measured and calculated data agreed well. Keywords: simulated moving bed (SMB), column liquid chromatography, polymeric adsorbent resin, amino acid aqueous solution Introduction It is typical in biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry that water phase mixture for processing contains end-product or active ingredient in small concentration beside the contaminant or polluting components. Simulated moving bed (SMB) preparative chromatography can be advantageous among the end-product recovery methods for continuous processing of high purity products, or products being difficult to isolate. Basically the SMB chromatograph works similarly to the true moving bed (hereafter abbreviated as TMB). The TMB works in the following way by Figure 1a: in a column the mobile phase moves upwards through the adsorbent that moves downwards simultaneously. The column is fitted with a feed inlet in the middle of the side-wall, a raffinate outlet on the upper part and an extract outlet on the lower part. Choosing the appropriate adsorbent moving velocity value and suitable eluent, feed, extract and raffinate flow rates, a stationary state can be obtained in the column with constant concentration profiles. The more binding component occurs in the lower (I-II) part of the column and the less binding one is located on the upper part (III-IV) of the column. This way two pure components can be obtained simultaneously in the extract and in the raffinate. The chromatographic quality of TMB is difficult to realize technically, therefore an SMB was employed in the preparative chromatography. SMB liquid chromatograph (hereafter- abbreviated SMB-LC) (Fig. 1b) is a multi-column system with two inputs and outputs (products), in 24 which liquid phase moves in counter-current of adsorbent phase. The counter-current stream is not real, but simulated, since the packed chromatographic stationary phase moves periodically after each switching time. The shorter the switching time and the more the number of columns are in the SMB-LC, the better it converges to the TMB-LC. The SMB technique is basically a two product preparative chromatographic operation. It is suitable for mixtures to be separated having two components or can be produced two product fractions. In case of continuous system the two input streams are the fresh eluent and feed, the two outputs are the extract and raffinate. Above all in basic case regenerated eluent of re-circulating stream is added to the fresh eluent. Similarly to the TMB the lower part (I-II) of the column is rich in the more binding component and at the upper part (III-IV) of the column contains the less binding component. The inlet and the outlet fluid flow streams divide the column system into four zones (Fig.1.) I II III IV Eluens F E R A Rec D+D Rec D Rec D CM IV III D+D Rec F R E I II D Rec A; B; Figure 1. The scheme of a) true moving bed (TMB) and b) simulated moving bed (SMB). True moving bed (TMB) adsorber: I, II, III, IV – zones; D – desorbent (solvent, eluent); D Rec – recirculated eluent; A Rec – adsorbent recirculation; E – extract stream with the better adsorbed component A; F – feed stream with the components A and B; R – raffinate stream with the less adsorbed component B. Simulated moving bed (SMB) liquid chromatograph – I, II, III, IV – zones, respectively HPLC columns; CM – direction of simulated moving of HPLC columns. The inlet liquid stream of the first zone is the mixture of the fresh and recirculated eluent. The first column of the first zone has to be regenerated till the end of each switching time period to protect carrying strongly adsorbed components by adsorbent phase. The inlet liquid stream of the second zone is the mobile phase from the first zone minus the flow stream of the extract. This flow stream must be determined so that the less binding component could leave the first column of the second zone till the end of the switching period avoiding to get into the extract. The inlet liquid stream of the third zone is the mobile phase from the second zone plus the feed stream to be separated. The function of this zone is holding the more binding component in the adsorbent phase, since the less binding component is taken away as a raffinate at the end of the zone. Four-zone SMB is favourable when retarding the less binding component – regenerating the solvent. The regenerated solvent can be recycled and added to the fresh eluent. In case of recycled solvent the system is called closed loop SMB. This version is more favourable compared to the open loop system from economic and environmental point of view. Three-zone SMB is preferred in systems with high selectivity factor, when the less binding component has low capacity factor flowing nearly together with the mobile phase [1,2]. According to the above facts the operational parameters of the process are the switching time, the flow rates of the mobile phase in each zones determined by the external flow rates (fresh and recycled eluent, extract, feed, raffinate). Summing up the possibilities for amino acid preparative separation the following chromatographic methods were applied in practice: ion-exchange column liquid chromatography, ion- exchange parametric pumping, size-exclusion chromatography, reverse phase adsorption chromatography. In case of reverse phase adsorption chromatography for separation of amino acids solved in water: the styrene-divynilbenzene copolymers with non-polar surface and the polymethacrylate resins with weakly polar surface can be used in the presence of electrolytes or polar solvent. In such systems the adsorption equilibrium depends on the temperature, the solvent strength, the pH [3,4] and on the electrolyte concentration of aqueous solution [2]. The design of industrial scale SMB-LC process requires numerous preliminary experiments. At the selection of the packing we can reduce the number of the possible alternatives if we consider the chemical character of the adsorbents. The most frequently used technique is the determination of adsorption selectivity with an analytical HPLC instrument with a given adsorbent by injection method. The adsorbent is giving the best selectivity to be examined further on within small-scale or large-scale laboratory circumstances. We examined the model samples by frontal adsorption-desorption 25 method on the small scale lab size column packed with polymer adsorbent. The advantage of this method is that frontal adsorption and desorption processes of the SMB-LC can be investigated. After determining the equilibrium data of the selected systems and the column packing characteristics the initial operating parameters of the SMB can be calculated. The initial operating parameters for a three zone open loop SMB was calculated by the method of Morbidelli et al. [5]. The first zone regeneration is appropriate when: )L(1 LT A D mK IA ε ε − − =< (1) The less binding component must be removed from the second zone till the end of the switching time. The function of the third zone is the retarding of the better-adsorbed component, namely this component must not break through the third zone: AIIB K)L(1 LT A ED m99.9 >99.9 >99.9 >99.9 AA06, t=60°C 8.130 3.697 >99.9 >99.9 >99.9 >99.9 Small lab SMB Preparative SMB Phenylalanine 95.58 93 89.072.302 Phenylalanine 98.34 98.5 98.21 Productivity [mg/gh] Purity [%] Yield [%] Productivity [mg/gh] Purity [%] Yield [%] Phenylalanine 0.667 1.645 Beside the prescribed purity and yield in industrial production the productivity must be the highest, the solvent use the less and adsorbent utility is the best. The initial operating conditions were planned with the help of Morbidelli’s equilibrium method (Fig. 4.). The first parameters can be improved, while increasing the feed value or concentration. An obvious possibility is the increase of all flow rates (eluent, feed, extract, raffinate) proportionally and decrease the switching time. We used this method for desalting of DL-β-phenylalanine on the small-lab SMB. There are kinetic limits of the flow rate increase (Fig. 5.). Other possibility is to improve the regeneration of the first zone for example by increasing temperature. With this method less fresh eluent is necessary, thus we can increase the feed flow rate and so the productivity improves. By the phenylalanine–glycine separation lower selectivity was measured at higher temperature. The initial steep of adsorption equilibrium isotherm decreased, therefore L-phenylalanine desorption went on easier. Thus the switching time could be reduced from 45 min to 30 min, so feed stream was increased from 20.3 ml/min to max. 43.5 ml/min. Conclusions We planned initial parameters with the help of Morbidelli’s equilibrium method for SMB separation in water of phenylalanine-glycine, respectively phenylalanine–sodium-chloride model systems on polymer adsorbents. We investigated two ways to improve the productivity. The increase of all flow streams and the decrease of period time in the desalting of DL-β-phenylalanine is limited by adsorption and desorption kinetics of the amino acid: the productivity was increased 3 times, but the yield decreased from 95.6% to 89% (SMB 3, 4, 5 measurements). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 62.5 75 87.5 measurement time [min] U V , c on du ct iv ity s ig na l [ m V ] (a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 62.5 75 87.5 measurement time [min] U V , c on du ct iv ity s ig na l [ m V ] (b) Figure 5. Measured concentration commensurable signals by SMB5 experiment in a) raffinate and b) extract. Markers: signal of phenylalanine (+) and signal of NaCl (*). The phenylalanine–glycine SMB-LC system temperature was risen from 20°C to 60°C (AA03, AA06 measurements), thus productivity was increased 1.8 times. Rising temperature gives solution only for an optimal value because application of ventiles, cocks, fittings, etc. is limited by temperature. 31 SYMBOLS D – flow rate of eluent (cm3/min) E – flow rate of extract (cm3/min) F – flow rate of feed to be separated (cm3/min) T – period time or column switching time (min) A – cross-section of the SMB-column (cm2) L – column length (cm) ε – overall porosity mI, mII, mIII, mIV – Morbidelli’s parameters KA, KB – equilibrium distribution coefficient k’ – capacity factor Vaminoacid, VNaCl – inflection point of the breakthrough curve (cm3) qPhe – phenylalanine concentration in stationary phase (mg/g) cPhe – phenylalanine concentration in mobile phase (mg/cm3) cNaCl – NaCl concentration in mobile phase (mg/cm3) REFERENCES 1. HASHIMOTO K., YAMADA M. and SHIRAI Y.: J. of Chem. Eng. (1987), Vol. 20 No. 4, 405-409 2. MOLNAR Z., NAGY M., HANAK L., SZANYA T. and ARGYELAN J.: J. Chromatogr. (2004), Vol. 60, 75-80 3. GRZEGORCZYK D. S. and CARTA G.: Chem. Eng. Sci., 51 (1996) 807 4. GRZEGORCZYK D. S. and CARTA G.: Chem. Eng. Sci., 51 (1996) 819 5. MIGLIORINI C., MAZZOTTI M. and MORBIDELLI M.: J. Chromatogr. A, 827 (1998) 161 6. GUIOCHON G.: J. CHROM. A. 965 (2002) 129- 161 7. HEUER C., KÜSTENS E., PLATTNER T. and SEIDEL-MORGENSTERN A.: J. Chromatogr. A, 827 (1998) 175 8. SZANYA T., ARGYELAN J., KOVATS S. and HANAK L.: J. Chromatogr. A, 908 (2001) 265