HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY AND CHEMISTRY Vol. 52(1) pp. 1–7 (2024) hjic.mk.uni-pannon.hu DOI: 10.33927/hjic-2024-01 AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS: THE FINGERED CITRON HILAL TASBASI1 AND MELTEM ASAN-OZUSAGLAM1* 1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Art and Sciences Faculty, Aksaray University, Bahcesaray District, Aksaray, 68100, TURKEY The fingered citron (Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis), which originates from India, has spread to different parts of the world over time. In opposition to the increasing resistance to traditional antimicrobial agents, the application of alternative treatments developed using herbs has recently gained interest. The aim of th is study is to investigate alternative applications of the fingered citron in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries. For this purpose, the antimicrobial activity of fingered citron leaf water extract (FCLWE) against test microorganisms was evaluated using a disk diffusion assay. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum cidal concentrations (bactericidal - MBC or fungicidal - MFC) of the extract were also determined. For FCLWE, among the pathogenic test microorganisms, Listeria monocytogenes strain ATCC 7644 and Staphylococcus aureus strain ATCC 25923 showed the smallest and the largest inhibition zone diameters, with values of 7.06 and 11.57 mm, respectively. MIC and MBC or MFC values of FCLWE varied from 10 to 40 µg/µl. In addition, the sun protection factors (SPF) of FCLWE and a mixture of FCLWE and commercial sun creams at different concentrations were determined. The SPF value of FCLWE was found to be 25. The mixture of FCLWE and commercial sun cream at an amount of 10 ml yielded an SPF value of 12.26. Next, the biological activity of the cream formulation obtained with commercial cream, FCLWE and Limosilactobacillus fermentum MA-7 (cream-leaf water extract-probiotic - CWP) was investigated against test microorganisms using the well diffusion method. CWP exhibited inhibitory activity against L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 (2.56 mm), Candida glabrata RSKK 04019 (2.81 mm), C. albicans ATCC 10231 (4.54 mm) and S. aureus ATCC 25923 (5.00 mm). It was observed that the cream formulation of CWP increased the diameters of the inhibition zone by creating a synergistic effect against all pathogenic test microorganisms. FCLWE may potentially be used as an alternative natural additive to chemical preservatives in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries. Keywords: antimicrobial activity, citrus, cream formulation, probiotic, sun protection factor 1. Introduction Although antibiotics are among the most preferred options when combating bacterial infections [1], their inappropriate and widespread use causes microorganisms to develop resistance, posing a threat worldwide [2]. The increasing microbial resistance to synthetic antimicrobial agents poses a global challenge and the demand for alternative medicines targeting resistant strains is on the rise [3]-[4]. Medicinal and aromatic antimicrobial agents that may be effective against resistant strains are under investigation [5]. The medicinal properties of plants have been passed down from one society to the next for centuries [6]. Antimicrobial agents found in plants have an enormous therapeutic potential [7]. The medicinal properties of plants are often specific to certain genera of plants and arise from secondary metabolites present in their structure. Secondary metabolites found in plants consist of coumarins, alkaloids, terpenes, fatty acids, tannins, steroids and flavonoids [7]-[8]. Plants are Received: 7 Nov 2023; Revised: 12 Nov 2023; Accepted: 14 Nov 2023 *Correspondence: meltemozusaglam@gmail.com alternative natural resources that exhibit antimicrobial effects [9]. Fingered citron (FC) is an evergreen species of tree belonging to the Rutaceae family [10]. Originating from India, over time it has spread to different regions around the world [11]. This species possesses bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, terpenes, neolignans, coumarins and alkaloids [12]-[14]. Clinically, it has demonstrated various health effects, including hypoglycemic properties, efficacy in managing type 2 diabetes, hepatoprotective activity, relief from stomach pain, expectorant properties, potential anticancer activity and immunomodulatory effects [12]-[15]. The skin, which is crucial in protecting internal organs from external factors, is the largest sensory organ in our body. Being constantly in contact with external factors, it is exposed to possible dangers posed by harmful microorganisms. The first line of defense of the body against harmful microorganisms is the skin. The specific microbial flora on the skin protects against adverse environmental conditions [16]. Probiotics, on the https://doi.org/10.33927/hjic-2024-01 mailto:meltemozusaglam@gmail.com TASBASI AND ASAN-OZUSAGLAM Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry 2 other hand, contain live microorganisms that alter the skin flora of the host [17]. Probiotic microorganisms are used to reduce skin inflammation, regenerate the skin microbiota, delay aging and treat diseases such as dermatitis [18]-[19]. The fermentation broth called "lactic acid bacteria ferment" according to the International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI) is used in the production of various cosmetic ingredients [20]. For these reasons, both oral and topical probiotics are used to treat skin diseases and improve skin health by regulating microbial flora [16]-[21]. The sun serves as one of our primary energy sources, enabling life to thrive on Earth [22]. Working environments and outdoor areas are places where the risk of exposure to the sun's ultraviolet radiation is high [23]. When exposed to ultraviolet radiation from the sun, dermatitis, premature aging, cancer, tanning and sunburn can occur in the human body [22]-[24]. Ultraviolet light is divided into 3 regions, namely UVA (400-320 nm), UVB (320-290 nm) and UVC (290-200 nm) [25]. It is crucial to promote the use of photoprotective agents to mitigate the detrimental effects of ultraviolet radiation [26]. Certain components with photoprotective properties reduce the harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. For this reason, the protective properties of plant extracts on the skin are being investigated. Bioactive molecules such as flavonoids and carotenoids contained in plant-based cosmetic products protect the skin from sunlight [27]. In this study, the antimicrobial activity of fingered citron leaf water extract (FCLWE) obtained using water as a solvent against clinical and foodborne pathogens as well as some probiotic candidate strains such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was tested. Sun protection factor (SPF) values of FCLWE and cream-FCLWE mixtures at different concentrations were measured to determine their potential application in the cosmetics industry as a natural alternative to chemical preservatives. In addition, the potential of new cream formulations prepared with FCLWE and the probiotic L. fermentum MA-7 in developing natural products by replacing chemical products in both the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries was investigated. 2. Experimental 2.1. Plant material FC leaf was obtained from Köyceğiz Plant World (Muğla-Türkiye) in October 2022 (Figure 1.A). 2.2. Preparation of leaf water extract FC leaves (Figure 1.B) were dried in dry conditions in the absence of light. The ground leaves were extracted with water in a water bath (80 °C) over 24 hours (Figure 1.C). The FCLWE was filtered before being evaporated and concentrated to 100 mg/ml using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) then refrigerated at +4 °C until used. 2.3. Preparation of bacterial strains In this study, four pathogens and five LAB were used. All strains tested (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 in a nutrient broth, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644 in Tryptic Soy Broth, Limosilactobacillus fermentum MA-7, Limosilactobacillus fermentum MA-8, Lactobacillus gasseri MA-1, Lactobacillus delbrueckii MA-9, Limosilactobacillus vaginalis MA-10 in De Man- Rogosa-Sharpe agar at 37 °C as well as Candida glabrata RSKK 04019 and Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in Yeast Peptone Dextrose at 30 °C) were incubated at the specified temperature and in a particular environment for 24 hours. 2.4. Determination of antimicrobial activity The antimicrobial activity of the FCLWE was determined by the disk diffusion method [28]. The concentration (0.5 McFarland) of test microorganisms was prepared and the prepared suspension (100 µl) spread onto the agar medium. 3 replicates of sterile disks (6 mm) were placed on the agar medium. For the pathogens, 20 µl (2 mg/disk) of FCLWE was dripped onto each disk. For the LAB, 5 µl (0.5 mg/disk), 10 µl (1 mg/disk) and 20 µl (2 mg/disk) of FCLWE were dripped onto the disks. The Petri dishes were incubated at the specified temperature for 24 hours as mentioned above. Figure 1: Samples of fingered citron leaves extracted with water https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/food-science/lactobacillus THE FINGERED CITRON 52(1) pp. 1–7 (2024) 3 2.5. Minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal or fungicidal concentrations The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal (MBC) or fungicidal (MFC) concentration of the FCLWE were determined by the microdilution method [28]. The FCLWE and medium were added to the tubes and diluted before the test microorganism was added at a concentration of 0.5 McFarland. The samples extracted from MIC tubes were inoculated onto the solid medium. The FCLWE concentration at which the growth of microorganisms stopped was recorded as the MIC value. The concentration at which growth stopped in the solid medium incubated at the appropriate temperature for 24 hours was determined as the MBC or MFC value. 2.6. Determination of the SPF values of FCLWE and cream-FCLWE mixtures The SPF values of the FCLWE and cream mixtures (cream-FCLWE) at different concentrations were determined using a Beckman Coulter spectrophotometer. The absorption values of FCLWE dissolved in ethanol (96%) were obtained in the range of 290 to 320 nm (every 5 nm). To determine the SPF values of the cream- FCLWE mixtures, 0.5 g of the extract and 1 g of the cream were added to a different tube before the volume was increased to 10 ml with distilled water. After diluting the mixture with ethanol (40%), sonication was performed before being filtered through Whatman Grade 1 filter paper. 3 replicates of each of the cream-FCLWE mixtures obtained at different amounts (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 ml) were measured in a spectrophotometer. SPF values were determined based on the formula below [29]: 𝑆𝑃𝐹 = 𝐶𝐹 х ∑ 𝐸𝐸(𝜆) x 𝐼(𝜆) х 𝐴𝑏𝑠 (𝜆) 320 290 (1) where CF is a correction factor, EE(λ) is the erythmogenic effect of radiation with wavelength λ, I(λ) is the intensity of solar light at wavelength λ and Abs (λ) is the spectophotometric absorbance value at wavelength λ. 2.7. Antimicrobial activity of the cream formulation containing FCLWE and probiotic The antimicrobial activity of the cream formulation enriched with FCLWE and probiotic (L. fermentum MA- 7) was evaluated using a modified protocol by following the well diffusion method [30]. The cream formulation was prepared using a commercial cream, FCLWE and L. fermentum MA-7 [31]. Four different test sample groups were created for this experiment, namely one containing only the cream (control – C), another containing the cream and probiotic (CP), one more containing the cream and leaf water extract (CW) as well as a final group with the cream containing both the leaf water extract and probiotic (CWP). 2.8. Statistical analysis The statistical analysis of the data concerning the biological activity was carried out using GNU SPSS software. The data points were confirmed by performing the One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc test (P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant). 3. Results and discussion The spread of pathogenic microorganisms and the development of resistance cause serious health problems [32]. The antimicrobial activity of the FCLWE against clinical, foodborne and yeast pathogens was determined using the disk diffusion assay and microdilution methods. The diameters of the inhibition zones obtained from the disk diffusion assay are given in Table 1. Data referring two antibiotics are also in Table 1. In case of FCLWE, the maximum diameters of the inhibition zones among the test microorganisms was 11.57 mm with regard to S. aureus ATCC 25923. The diameter of the inhibition zone appears to be good when C. glabrata RSKK 04019 (9.95 mm) and C. albicans ATCC 10231 (10.83 mm) were tested, which were used as fungal test microorganisms. L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 exhibited the smallest diameter of the inhibition zone, that is, 7.06 mm (P<0.05). When evaluated statistically, the difference between S. aureus ATCC 25923, C. glabrata RSKK 04019 and C. albicans ATCC 10231, which exhibited visually large inhibition zones, was also found to be insignificant (P>0.05). The FCLWE was biologically active on the test microorganisms. In a study, the antimicrobial activity of an essential oil obtained from the leaves of FC was determined by the disk diffusion method. An inhibition zone of 11 mm in diameter was observed when using S. aureus [33]. In our study, the FCLWE exhibited a similar level of antimicrobial activity on S. aureus ATCC 25923 (11.57 mm). El Hawary et al. determined the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil obtained from the leaves of Table 1: Diameters of the inhibition zone of FCLWE using different pathogens Pathogens Diameter of the Inhibition Zone (mm±SD) FCLWE AM FCA S. aureus ATCC 25923 11.57±0.69a 21.04±0.80 ND L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 7.06±1.23b 29.57±0.10 ND C. glabrata RSKK 04019 9.95±0.51a ND 20.35±0.10 C. albicans ATCC 10231 10.83±0.19a ND 21.85±1.76 * FCLWE: Fingered Citron Leaf Water Extract, AM: Ampicillin, FCA: Fluconazole, ND: Not Determined. * Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) determined by One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. TASBASI AND ASAN-OZUSAGLAM Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry 4 FC using the well diffusion method. FC oil did not produce a zone of inhibition against S. aureus ATCC 6538 whereas a 15 mm zone of inhibition was observed C. albicans NRRL Y-477 [34]. In our study, the FCLWE exhibited a good degree of antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC 25923 but a lower level of antifungal activity against C. albicans ATCC 10231. Differences in the growing conditions of the plant, the method of extraction and the technique used to measure the antimicrobial activity may cause variations in the results. The antimicrobial activity of FCLWE against LAB strains were determined using the disk diffusion assay and microdilution methods. The obtained inhibition zones are given in Table 2. The inhibitory activity of the FCLWE on L. fermentum MA-7, L. fermentum MA-8 and L. vaginalis MA-10 was immeasurable at a concentration of 0.5 mg/disk. The results of the statistical analysis showed that no significant difference was observed between the averages of L. fermentum MA-8 and L. vaginalis MA-10 with L. fermentum MA-7 (P>0.05), however, visual data indicates that the smallest inhibition zone was obtained in L. fermentum MA-7 at a concentration of 2 mg/disk. According to these results, the probiotic candidate L. fermentum MA-7 is the least inhibited or not inhibited by FCLWE. The MIC and MBC or MFC results of the clinical, foodborne and yeast pathogens are given in Table 3. The MIC and MBC or MFC values of the FCLWE varied from 10 to 40 µg/µl. The minimum MIC and MBC values of the FCLWE were 10 µg/μl against S. aureus ATCC 25923, while that of the MFC values was 20 µg/μl against C. glabrata RSKK 04019. The results of the biological activity assays indicated that the FCLWE exhibits bactericidal and fungicidal effects against all the pathogenic microorganisms tested at various concentrations. In a study by Akarca and Baytal, the MIC and MBC values of extracts obtained from fresh and dried leaves of C. lemon were determined. The MIC values of the extracts were recorded as 93.75 and 35.16 µg/µl against S. aureus ATCC 6538 but 140.63 and 46.88 µg/µl against L. monocytogenes ATCC 51774, respectively. The MBC values of the extracts were recorded as 39.06 and 23.44 µg/µl against S. aureus ATCC 6538 but 93.72 and 31.25 µg/µl against L. monocytogenes ATCC 51774, respectively [35]. In our study, the MIC and MBC values of the FCLWE on S. aureus ATCC 25923 and L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 were found to be lower than in the referred study. The MIC and MBC values of the FCLWE against the tested LAB are given in Table 4 which varied from 10 to 40 µg/µl. The MIC value of the FCLWE was 10 µg/μl against all the tested bacteria, while the MBC value was 20 µg/μl against L. fermentum MA-7. In the current study, the SPF value of the FCLWE was determined to be 25. Due to its high value, the SPF of the cream-FCLWE mixture at different concentrations was also examined. The SPF values of the cream- FCLWE mixtures are given in Figure 2. The highest SPF of the cream-FCLWE mixture was 12.26 at an amount of 10 ml. The results of this study examining the SPF values of the cream-FCLWE mixture at different FCLWE concentrations show that FCLWE significantly increases the SPF of the commercial cream, even at the lowest concentration. Vella et al. determined the SPF values of essential oils obtained from the shells of various Citrus species Table 2: Diameters of the inhibition zones of FCLWE against LAB Diameter of the Inhibition Zone (mm±SD) Lactic Acid Bacteria FCLWE 0.5 mg/disk 1.0 mg/disk 2.0 mg/disk L. fermentum MA-7 NDa 6.32±0.20a 9.22±0.31a L. fermentum MA-8 NDa 6.28±0.13a 10.34±0.34a L. gasseri MA-1 6.17±0.14b 6.68±0.63a 10.66±0.28b L. delbrueckii MA-9 6.15±0.11b 6.87±0.22a 11.73±0.32b L. vaginalis MA-10 NDa 6.66±0.17a 10.01±0.96a *FCLWE: Fingered Citron Leaf Water Extract, ND: Not Determined. *Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) using the One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. Table 3: MIC and MBC or MFC of FCLWE against pathogens Pathogens FCLWE MIC (µg/µl) MBC or MFC (µg/µl) S. aureus ATCC 25923 10 10 L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 20 40 C. glabrata RSKK 04019 20 20 C. albicans ATCC 10231 40 40 *FCLWE: Fingered Citron Leaf Water Extract, MIC and MBC or MFC: Minimum Inhibitory and Minimum Bactericidal or Fungicidal Concentrations Table 4: MIC and MBC of the FCLWE against LAB Lactic Acid Bacteria FCLWE MIC (µg/µl) MBC (µg/µl) L. fermentum MA-7 10 20 L. fermentum MA-8 10 20 L. gasseri MA-1 10 20 L. delbrueckii MA-9 10 20 *FCLWE: Fingered Citron Leaf Water Extract, MIC and MBC or MFC: Minimum Inhibitory and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations THE FINGERED CITRON 52(1) pp. 1–7 (2024) 5 using the Mansur equation. The obtained SPF values were presented as 2.04 for C. limon, 3.75 for C. reticulata, 8.96 for C. aurantium and 9.74 for C. bergamia [36]. The SPF of FCLWE measured by Vella et al. was higher than recorded in this study. A cream formulation was developed by adding L. fermentum MA-7 sonicated in the FCLWE. In order to be effective, the cream must be reliable. The use of lysates or inactivated microorganisms reduces safety issues such as shelf life, translocation and infection, thereby increasing their usability in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries [37]. Additionally, L. fermentum MA-7 lysate used in the cream formulation is associated with antimicrobial activity and exhibited the smallest inhibition zone in the FCLWE. The antimicrobial activities of the cream formulation developed with the commercial cream, FCLWE and probiotic were determined using the well diffusion method and the inhibition zones are given in Table 5. In the C test sample group, the diameter of the inhibition zone against the pathogenic strains (except for C. albicans ATCC 10231) could not be determined. The largest diameters of the inhibition zones in the case of the CW and CWP test sample groups were 2.72 and 5.00 mm against S. aureus ATCC 25923, respectively. The developed cream formulation may be used as an antimicrobial agent against contaminations of S. aureus ATCC 25923. When C, CW and CWP groups were compared statistically, a significant difference was determined for S. aureus ATCC 25923 and L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 (P<0.05). In the CP group, the diameters of the inhibition zones were determined against all the tested microorganisms (except for L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644). The statistical analysis indicated that the difference between the antimicrobial activity of the C (2.08 mm) and CW (2.47 mm) groups on C. albicans ATCC 10231 was insignificant (P>0.05), but a significant difference was observed between the CP (4.01 mm) and CWP (4.54 mm) (P<0.05) groups. Common fungal infections such as C. albicans cause systemic infections by affecting the skin and mucosal surfaces [38]. For this reason, the developed cream formulation can provide a natural solution by exhibiting an inhibitory effect against Candida spp. Most importantly, an increase in the diameter of the inhibition zones was observed when comparing the C and CWP groups against all pathogen strains. Determining the biological effect of the cream formulation comprised of natural ingredients against the pathogenic strains may potentially facilitate its application in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries. Salako et al. determined the effects of extracts derived from the bulb Allium sativum (ASB) and C. sinensis peel (CSP) using ethanol as a solvent on C. albicans. The antifungal properties of the combinations obtained by blending these extracts at concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 mg/ml and ratios of 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 were determined by the agar well diffusion method. The ASB:CSP mixture (1:2) exhibited the highest inhibitory activity with a diameter of the inhibition zone of 21.00 mm when tested at a concentration of 50 mg/ml. This specific ASB:CSP mixture (1:2) at a concentration of 50 mg/ml was subsequently formulated into an ointment [39]. In our study, it is evident that the cream formulation containing FCLWE and probiotic provides significant protective effects against pathogens. Additionally, the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries can develop innovative products such as creams and ointments with these formulations containing natural alternative ingredients. 4. Conclusions The antimicrobial activity of FCLWE against clinical and foodborne pathogens as well as LAB was investigated to determine its possible applications in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. It was determined that FCLWE exhibits antimicrobial and antifungal activities. FCLWE and cream formulations at different concentrations can be Figure 2: SPF values of the cream-FCLWE mixtures Table 5: Diameters of the inhibition zones of the FCLWE and probiotic cream mixture against pathogens Pathogens Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm±SD) C CP CW CWP S. aureus ATCC 25923 NDa 1.25±0.10a 2.72±0.10b 5.00±1.08c L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 NDa NDa 1.03±0.00b 2.56±0.53c C. glabrata RSKK 04019 NDa 2.21±0.44b NDa 2.81±0.48c C. albicans ATCC 10231 2.08±0.10a 4.01±1.16b 2.47±0.09a 4.54±0.70c *C: Cream (Control), CP: Cream-Probiotic, CW: Cream-Water Extract, CWP: Cream-Water Extract-Probiotic, ND: Not Determined *Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) by applying the One-Way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's post-hoc test. TASBASI AND ASAN-OZUSAGLAM Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry 6 used as alternative additives to chemical preservatives due to their high SPF values. FCLWE combined with a probiotic and commercial cream exhibited a high level of antimicrobial activity against clinical and foodborne pathogens. As a result, the water extract from FC leaves could be pioneering as far as the development of new plant-based products in both the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries is concerned to protect the skin against pathogens as well as provide an alternative to chemical preservatives that threaten public health. REFERENCES [1] Anand, U.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.: A comprehensive review on medicinal plants as antimicrobial therapeutics: Potential avenues of biocompatible drug discovery, Metabolites, 2019, 9(11), 258, DOI: 10.3390/metabo9110258 [2] Serwecińska, L.: Antimicrobials and antibiotic- resistant bacteria: A risk to the environment and to public health, Water, 2020, 12(12), 3313, DOI: 10.3390/w12123313 [3] Shriram, V.; Khare, T.; Bhagwat, R.; Shukla, R.; Kumar, V.: Inhibiting bacterial drug efflux pumps via phyto-therapeutics to combat threatening antimicrobial resistance, Front. Microbiol., 2018, 9(DEC), 2990, DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02990 [4] World Health Organization: WHO releases first- ever list of health-threatening fungi https://www.who.int/news/item/25-10-2022-who-releases-first- ever-list-of-health-threatening-fungi (accessed on 1 February 2023) [5] Kiymaci, M.E.; Kaskatepe, B.: Assessment of cinnamon as an antimicrobial agent, in: Promising antimicrobials from natural products, Rai, M.; Kosalec, I. (Eds.), (Springer, Cham.), 2022, pp. 53–73, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83504-0_4 [6] Sarah, R.; Idrees, N.; Tabassum, B.: A review of endophytic microbiota of medicinal plants and their antimicrobial properties, in: Core microbiome: Improving crop quality and productivity, Parray, J.A.; Shameem, N.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Mir, M.Y. (Eds.), (Wiley), 2022, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.1002/9781119830795.ch1 [7] Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E.: Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A review study on challenges and future perspectives, Microorganisms, 2021, 9(10), 2041, DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9102041 [8] Saranraj, P.; Sivasakthi, S.: Medicinal plants and its antimicrobial properties: A review, Glob. J. Pharmacol., 2014, 8(3), 316–327, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.gjp.2014.8.3.83194 [9] Cowan, M.M.: Plant products as antimicrobial agents, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1999, 12(4), 564–582, DOI: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.564 [10] Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Sun, P.; Chen, C.; Shen, J.: Community structure of phyllosphere bacteria in different cultivars of fingered citron (Citrus medica 'Fingered') and their correlations with fragrance, Front. Plant Sci., 2022, 13, 936252, DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.936252 [11] Dugo, G.; Di Giacomo, A.: Citrus: The Genus Citrus (Medicinal and aromatic plants - Industrial profiles book series) (CRC Press, London), 2002, ISBN: 9780415284912 [12] Chen, J.; Wu, G.; Zhu, C.; Wu, Y.; Wei, R.; Ma, Q.: Structurally diverse flavonoids from Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis Swingle and their multiple bioactivities: A review, J. Food Nutr. Res., 2022, 10(2), 81–87, DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-10-2-1 [13] Ma, Q.-G.; Wei, R.-R.; Yang, M.; Huang, X.-Y.; Wang, F.; Dong, J.-H.; Sang, Z.-P.: Isolation and characterization of neolignan derivatives with hepatoprotective and neuroprotective activities from the fruits of Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis Swingle, Bioorg. Chem., 2021, 107, 104622, DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104622 [14] Xu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Xu, C.; Sun, J.; Grierson, D.; Zhang, B.; Chen, K.: Integration of metabolite profiling and transcriptome analysis reveals genes related to volatile terpenoid metabolism in finger citron (C. medica var. sarcodactylis), Molecules, 2019, 24(14), 2564, DOI: 10.3390/molecules24142564 [15] Arias, B.Á.; Ramón-Laca, L.: Pharmacological properties of citrus and their ancient and medieval uses in the Mediterranean region, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2005, 97(1), 89–95, DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.019 [16] Majeed, M.; Vaidyanathan, P.; Paschapur, M.; Pharm, M.; Majeed, S.: Role of probiotics for balanced skin microflora, Euro Cosmetics, 2015, 9(1), 10–11 [17] Woolery‐Lloyd, H.; Andriessen, A.; Day, D.; Gonzalez, N.; Green, L.; Grice, E.; Henry, M.: Review of the microbiome in skin aging and the effect of a topical prebiotic containing thermal spring water, J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2023, 22(1), 96–102, DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15464 [18] Habeebuddin, M.; Karnati, R.K.; Shiroorkar, P.N.; Nagaraja, S.; Asdaq, S.M.B.; Anwer, M.K.; Fattepur, S.: Topical probiotics: More than a skin deep, Pharmaceutics, 2022, 14(3), 557, DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030557 [19] Htwe, M.M.; Teanpaisan, R.; Amnuaikit, T.: Human oral Lactobacilli cell free supernatant for cosmetic cream, Suranaree J. Sci. Technol., 2020, 27(3), 070007(1–7) [20] Tóth, P.; Németh, Á.: Investigations into the usage of the mineral alginite fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei for cosmetic purposes, Hung. J. Ind. Chem., 2022, 50(2), 17–21, DOI: 10.33927/hjic-2022-13 [21] França, K.: Topical probiotics in dermatological therapy and skincare: A concise review, Dermatol. Ther. (Heildelb.), 2021, 11(1), 71–77, DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00476-7 https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9110258 https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9110258 https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123313 https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123313 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02990 https://www.who.int/news/item/25-10-2022-who-releases-first-ever-list-of-health-threatening-fungi https://www.who.int/news/item/25-10-2022-who-releases-first-ever-list-of-health-threatening-fungi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83504-0_4 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119830795.ch1 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119830795.ch1 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102041 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102041 https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.gjp.2014.8.3.83194 https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.gjp.2014.8.3.83194 https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.4.564 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.936252 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.936252 https://doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-10-2-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104622 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142564 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.019 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15464 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030557 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030557 https://doi.org/10.33927/hjic-2022-13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00476-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00476-7 THE FINGERED CITRON 52(1) pp. 1–7 (2024) 7 [22] Saucedo, G.M.G.; Vallejo, R.S.; Giménez, J.C.M.: Effects of solar radiation and an update on photoprotection, An. Pediatr. (English Edition), 2020, 92(6), 377(e1-e9), DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2020.04.003 [23] Modenese, A.; Korpinen, L.; Gobba, F.: Solar radiation exposure and outdoor work: An underestimated occupational risk, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(10), 2063, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102063 [24] Chinnasamy, S.; Ramachandran, M.; Sivaji, C.: A study on ultraviolet radiation and its effects, REST J. Adv. Mech. Eng., 2022, 1(2), 1–9, DOI: 10.46632/jame/1/2/1 [25] Chen, H.; Weng, Q.Y.; Fisher, D.E.: UV signaling pathways within the skin, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2014, 134(8), 2080–2085, DOI: 10.1038/jid.2014.161 [26] Lautenschlager, S.; Wulf, H.C.; Pittelkow, M.R.: Photoprotection, Lancet, 2007, 370(9586), 528– 537, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60638-2 [27] Cefali, L.C.; Ataide, J.A.; Moriel, P.; Foglio, M.A.; Mazzola, P.G.: Plant‐based active photoprotectants for sunscreens, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 2016, 38(4), 346–353, DOI: 10.1111/ics.12316 [28] Tacer, S.; Asan-Ozusaglam, M.: The potential uses of olive leaf extracts in various areas, Eurasian J. Food Sci. Technol., 2022, 6(1), 8–22 [29] Mansur, J.S.; Breder, M.N.R.; Mansur, M.C.A.; Azulay, R.D.: Determination of sun protection factor by spectrophotometry, An. Bras. Dermatol., 1986, 61(3), 121–124 [30] Asan-Ozusaglam, M.; Celik, I.: White pitahaya as a natural additive: potential usage in cosmetic industry, Foods Raw Mater., 2023, 11(1), 57–63, DOI: 10.21603/2308-4057-2023-1-552 [31] Asan-Ozusaglam, M.; Gunyakti, A.: Lactobacillus fermentum strains from human breast milk with probiotic properties and cholesterol-lowering effects, Food Sci. Biotechnol., 2019, 28(2), 501– 509, DOI: 10.1007/s10068-018-0494-y [32] Khezerlou, A.; Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Ehsani, A.: Nanoparticles and their antimicrobial properties against pathogens including bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses, Microb. Pathog., 2018, 123, 505–526, DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 [33] Theanphong, O.; Songsak, T.; Mingvanish, W.: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis (Sieber) Swingle leaf, Mahidol Univ. J. Pharm. Sci., 2008, 35(1-4), 57–61 [34] El Hawary, S.S.E.; Hashim, F.A.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Matloub, A.A.E.M.; ElSayed, A.M.; Farid, M.A.; Shata, H.M.A.H.; Kutkat, O.; El-Abd, E.A.W.; Ali, M.A.: A comparative study of chemical compositions, antimicrobial and antiviral activities of essential oils for Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis Swingle fruits and leaves along with Limonia acidissima L. leaves, Egypt. J. Chem., 2022, 65(8), 263–270, DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2021.108413.4958 [35] Akarca, G.; Baytal, F.: Antimicrobial activity of citrus peel and leaf extracts against foodborne pathogenic bacteria, Akademik Gıda, 2021, 19(4), 424–432, DOI: 10.24323/akademik-gida.1050775 [36] Vella, F.M.; Cautela, D.; Laratta, B.: Determination of antioxidant activity and sun protection factor of commercial essential oils, Biol. Life Sci. Forum, 2021, 6(1), 96, DOI: 10.3390/Foods2021-10992 [37] Taverniti, V.; Guglielmetti, S.: The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: Proposal of paraprobiotic concept), Genes Nutr., 2011, 6(3), 261–274, DOI: 10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x [38] Talapko, J.; Juzbašić, M.; Matijević, T.; Pustijanac, E.; Bekić, S.; Kotris, I.; Škrlec, I.: Candida albicans - the virulence factors and clinical manifestations of infection, J. Fungi, 2021, 7(2), 79, DOI: 10.3390/jof7020079 [39] Salako, K.S.; Silva, B.O.; Azubuike, C.P.; Salako, O.A.: Evaluation of the anti-candidal activity of the ointment formulation containing the admixture of Allium sativum (Liliaceae) and Citrus sinensis (Rutaceae), Niger. J. Pharm. Appl. Sci. Res., 2018, 7(1), 1–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2020.04.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2020.04.003 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102063 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102063 http://doi.org/10.46632/jame/1/2/1 http://doi.org/10.46632/jame/1/2/1 https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.161 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60638-2 https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12316 https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-1-552 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0494-y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.108413.4958 https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.108413.4958 https://doi.org/10.24323/akademik-gida.1050775 https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10992 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020079 https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020079