id	sid	eid	entity	type
hypothesis-25200	1	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	1	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	1	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	1	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	1	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	1	6	2017 21	DATE
hypothesis-25200	1	7	rachel stark	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	1	8	sacramento state university	ORG
hypothesis-25200	1	9	sacramento	GPE
hypothesis-25200	3	1	mickel paris	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	3	2	mlis health sciences	ORG
hypothesis-25200	3	3	the pacific stockton	ORG
hypothesis-25200	3	4	ed rogan	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	3	5	thomas j	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	4	1	health sciences university of the pacific stockton	ORG
hypothesis-25200	4	2	mary-kate	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	4	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	4	4	mlis library	ORG
hypothesis-25200	4	5	the pacific stockton	ORG
hypothesis-25200	4	6	mts library services	ORG
hypothesis-25200	4	7	the pacific stockton	ORG
hypothesis-25200	4	8	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	4	9	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	4	10	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	4	11	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	4	12	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	4	13	2017 22	DATE
hypothesis-25200	4	14	the health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-25200	6	1	two-hour	TIME
hypothesis-25200	7	1	the health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-25200	10	1	52	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	10	2	347%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	11	1	2224%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	11	2	1200%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	11	3	24%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	15	1	raic	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	15	2	thomas j. long	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	17	1	month	DATE
hypothesis-25200	17	2	bhsm) kickoff party	ORG
hypothesis-25200	19	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	19	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	20	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	20	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	20	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	20	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	20	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	20	6	2017 23	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	20	7	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	20	8	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	22	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	26	1	just 15	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	26	2	month	DATE
hypothesis-25200	26	3	bhsm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	28	1	67	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	28	2	bhsm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	28	3	15 (347%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	28	4	24 (1200%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	30	1	nine	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	30	2	eleven	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	33	1	beals	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	33	2	2007	DATE
hypothesis-25200	33	3	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	34	1	beals explores	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	34	2	the university of tennessee	ORG
hypothesis-25200	34	3	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	34	4	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	34	5	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	34	6	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	34	7	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	34	8	24	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	36	1	the university of colorado	ORG
hypothesis-25200	36	2	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	38	1	albert r. mann	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	38	2	cornell university	ORG
hypothesis-25200	38	3	5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	39	1	university of florida	ORG
hypothesis-25200	39	2	6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	41	1	frankenstein	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	41	2	harry potter	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	42	1	nlm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	44	1	catalano et al	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	45	1	8	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	46	1	•	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	46	2	university of akron science & technology library	ORG
hypothesis-25200	46	3	9	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	46	4	•	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	46	5	fort lewis college reed library	FAC
hypothesis-25200	47	1	10	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	2	•	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	3	himmelfarb health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-25200	47	4	george washington university medical center	ORG
hypothesis-25200	47	5	1979	DATE
hypothesis-25200	47	6	11	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	7	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	47	8	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	47	9	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	47	10	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	11	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	12	2017 25	DATE
hypothesis-25200	47	13	eight	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	47	14	2003	DATE
hypothesis-25200	47	15	janet doe	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	48	1	12	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	50	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	52	1	american	NORP
hypothesis-25200	54	1	the summer of 2015	DATE
hypothesis-25200	55	1	october 13th	DATE
hypothesis-25200	55	2	noon to 1pm	TIME
hypothesis-25200	62	1	500	MONEY
hypothesis-25200	63	1	three	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	63	2	the days	DATE
hypothesis-25200	64	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	64	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	64	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	64	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	64	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	64	6	2017 26	DATE
hypothesis-25200	64	7	one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	64	8	25.00	MONEY
hypothesis-25200	64	9	amazon	ORG
hypothesis-25200	64	10	15.00	MONEY
hypothesis-25200	64	11	itunes card	ORG
hypothesis-25200	65	1	first	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	65	2	second	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	65	3	third	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	69	1	the day	DATE
hypothesis-25200	75	1	several weeks	DATE
hypothesis-25200	79	1	first	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	79	2	month	DATE
hypothesis-25200	79	3	bhsm) kickoff party	ORG
hypothesis-25200	80	1	the bhsm event	ORG
hypothesis-25200	80	2	the same year	DATE
hypothesis-25200	81	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	81	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	81	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	81	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	81	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	81	6	347%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	81	7	bhsm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	82	1	67	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	82	2	only 15	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	82	3	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	83	1	67	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	83	2	60	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	84	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	85	1	+1200%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	86	1	23.08%	PERCENT
hypothesis-25200	87	1	month	DATE
hypothesis-25200	87	2	2015	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	3	october 2015	DATE
hypothesis-25200	87	4	15 67	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	5	11 54	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	6	3 7	DATE
hypothesis-25200	87	7	1 6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	8	26 32	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	9	6 29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	10	2 26	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	11	108	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	12	134	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	13	facebook click	ORG
hypothesis-25200	87	14	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	87	15	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	88	1	the month	DATE
hypothesis-25200	88	2	two	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	89	1	11	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	90	1	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	90	2	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	90	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	90	4	9	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	91	1	11	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	91	2	6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	91	3	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	91	4	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	91	5	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	92	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	92	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	92	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	92	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	92	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	92	6	2017 28	DATE
hypothesis-25200	92	7	thomas j. long	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	99	1	three	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	105	1	only one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	106	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	106	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	106	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	106	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	106	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	106	6	2017 29	DATE
hypothesis-25200	108	1	bhsm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	108	2	summer	DATE
hypothesis-25200	110	1	the spring	DATE
hypothesis-25200	111	1	first	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	113	1	13	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	114	1	one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	114	2	14	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	115	1	15	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	116	1	16	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	118	1	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	118	2	18	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	119	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	119	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	119	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	119	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	119	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	119	6	2017 30	DATE
hypothesis-25200	120	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	121	1	alvarez	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	121	2	alexander mb	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	123	1	2010;49(12):672-676	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	124	1	10.3928/01484834-20100831-04 2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	125	1	jones ek	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	125	2	kittendorf al	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	127	1	2016;51:174-183	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	128	1	doi:10.1111	ORG
hypothesis-25200	128	2	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	128	3	beals jb	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	130	1	north america	LOC
hypothesis-25200	131	1	2007;26(1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	131	2	56	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	132	1	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	132	2	shipman jp	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	132	3	stoddart jm	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	132	4	peay wj	GPE
hypothesis-25200	132	5	eccles ss	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	133	1	the medical library association	ORG
hypothesis-25200	134	1	2013;101(3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	134	2	179	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	135	1	doi:10.3163/1536-5050.101.3.006 5	DATE
hypothesis-25200	136	1	raskin h.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	137	1	college & research libraries news	ORG
hypothesis-25200	138	1	226	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	139	1	6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	139	2	buhler ag	ORG
hypothesis-25200	139	3	davis v. elegance	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	140	1	college & research libraries news	ORG
hypothesis-25200	141	1	2010;71(5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	141	2	248	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	142	1	7	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	142	2	tennant mr	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	142	3	edwards	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	142	4	daley m.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	142	5	nlm	ORG
hypothesis-25200	143	1	quarterly	DATE
hypothesis-25200	144	1	2013;32(3):266-289	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	144	2	8	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	145	1	catalano m	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	148	1	9	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	148	2	mccullough i.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	150	1	2015;81	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	151	1	oliver a.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	151	2	annual	DATE
hypothesis-25200	152	1	journal of library innovation	ORG
hypothesis-25200	153	1	2012;3(2):89	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	154	1	paris	GPE
hypothesis-25200	154	2	rogan	GPE
hypothesis-25200	154	3	finnegan dopkins	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	154	4	29	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	154	5	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	154	6	2017 31 11	DATE
hypothesis-25200	155	1	sullo e	ORG
hypothesis-25200	155	2	levett p	GPE
hypothesis-25200	155	3	wilcoxson m.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	157	1	2011;11(2):165-174	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	158	1	12	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	159	1	weise f.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	160	1	13	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	160	2	13	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	161	1	jackson l	ORG
hypothesis-25200	164	1	2015;49:759-772	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	165	1	doi:10.1111/medu.12768 14	ORG
hypothesis-25200	166	1	edmonds k	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	166	2	hammond m.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	167	1	international journal of art & design	ORG
hypothesis-25200	168	1	2012;31(1):78-89	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	168	2	15	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	168	3	de la croix	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	168	4	willson s.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	170	1	2011;45(11):1090-1100	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	171	1	16	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	172	1	jones ek	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	172	2	kittendorf al	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	174	1	2017;51(2):174	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	174	2	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	174	3	fjortoft n.	PERSON
hypothesis-25200	174	4	four	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	175	1	american journal	ORG
hypothesis-25200	176	1	2016;80(5):73	ORDINAL
hypothesis-25200	176	2	18	CARDINAL
hypothesis-25200	176	3	acpe	PRODUCT
hypothesis-25200	178	1	2015	DATE
hypothesis-25200	180	1	september 1, 2017	DATE