id	sid	eid	entity	type
hypothesis-26528	1	1	peer reviewed article hypothesis	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	2	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	1	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	1	4	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	1	5	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	6	caitlin bakker	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	7	mlis	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	8	nicole theis-mahon	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	9	mlis	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	10	sarah jane brown	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	11	mscc adiscovery technologies	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	12	john archer	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	1	13	university of regina	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	14	regina	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	15	saskatchewan	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	16	canada	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	17	health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	18	university of minnesota	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	19	minneapolis	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	20	minnesota	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	21	theis025@umn.edu	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	1	22	clibrarian	NORP
hypothesis-26528	1	23	health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	24	university of minnesota	ORG
hypothesis-26528	1	25	minneapolis	GPE
hypothesis-26528	1	26	minnesota	GPE
hypothesis-26528	5	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	6	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	8	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	9	1	324	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	9	2	98	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	10	1	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	10	2	96	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	10	3	42	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	10	4	39	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	10	5	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	12	1	0.0	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	12	2	0.58	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	13	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	14	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	16	1	1 https://www.orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-8382 https://orcid.org/	QUANTITY
hypothesis-26528	17	1	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	17	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	17	3	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	20	1	one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	21	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	21	2	one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	21	3	three	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	21	4	march 2022	DATE
hypothesis-26528	21	5	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	21	6	one billion	MONEY
hypothesis-26528	22	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	24	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	25	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	33	1	between 22% and 54%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	33	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	33	3	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	33	4	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	33	5	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	34	1	mecir manual.14-16	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	37	1	scopus	ORG
hypothesis-26528	37	2	sci-expanded	ORG
hypothesis-26528	38	1	two	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	39	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	41	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	43	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	49	1	4.1.3.18	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	49	2	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	52	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	52	2	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	52	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	52	4	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	55	1	1,396	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	56	1	312	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	56	2	32,559	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	57	1	324	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	57	2	286	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	58	1	eleven	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	58	2	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	58	3	313	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	59	1	97	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	59	2	31%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	59	3	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	60	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	60	2	118	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	60	3	37.7%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	61	1	98	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	61	2	2 (2%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	61	3	96	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	61	4	98%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	61	5	0	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	61	6	0%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	62	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	63	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	63	2	98	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	63	3	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	64	1	two	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	65	1	an additional 40	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	65	2	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	66	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	66	2	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	67	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	67	2	39	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	67	3	57	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	1	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	2	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	68	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	4	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	5	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	6	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	7	1.0	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	8	0.0 0.41	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	9	0.05	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	10	1.0	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	68	11	0.096 0.0 0.58	QUANTITY
hypothesis-26528	69	1	20-22	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	70	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	72	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	73	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	73	2	92.6%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	73	3	6.5%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	73	4	0.8%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	74	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	74	2	96	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	74	3	40	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	74	4	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	76	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	80	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	85	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	86	1	stacy brody	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	86	2	5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	86	3	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	86	4	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	86	5	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	87	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	88	1	less than one-third	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	89	1	31%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	89	2	38%	PERCENT
hypothesis-26528	93	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	97	1	one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	99	1	first	ORDINAL
hypothesis-26528	100	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	101	1	at least one	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	110	1	6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	110	2	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	110	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	110	4	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	111	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	112	1	garfield e.	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	113	1	doc symp proc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	114	1	1965;269:189–92	ORDINAL
hypothesis-26528	116	1	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	119	1	2004	DATE
hypothesis-26528	120	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	120	2	blaizot	GPE
hypothesis-26528	120	3	moreno-garcia	ORG
hypothesis-26528	120	4	wiratunga n	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	120	5	aceves-martins	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	123	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	124	1	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	124	2	opscidia plateforme pour accélérer la veille technologique	ORG
hypothesis-26528	126	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	127	1	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	127	2	feb 10	DATE
hypothesis-26528	128	1	5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	128	2	nicholson jm	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	128	3	mordaunt m	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	128	4	lopez p	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	128	5	rodrigues np	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	129	1	sci stud	ORG
hypothesis-26528	130	1	2021 nov 5;2(3):882–98	DATE
hypothesis-26528	130	2	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	134	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	135	1	https://help.scite.ai/en-us/article/where-do-you-get-your-articles-from-1vglydm/ 7	DATE
hypothesis-26528	135	2	brown sj	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	135	3	bakker cj	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	137	1	j med libr assoc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	138	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	138	2	feb 11;110(1):47–55	DATE
hypothesis-26528	139	1	moylan ec	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	139	2	kowalczuk	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	142	1	2016;6(11):e012047	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	142	2	2016 nov 23	DATE
hypothesis-26528	143	1	wager e	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	143	2	williams	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	145	1	1988-2008	DATE
hypothesis-26528	147	1	2011;37(9):567	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	147	2	10	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	148	1	nair s	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	148	2	yean c	ORG
hypothesis-26528	148	3	yoo j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	148	4	leff j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	148	5	delphin e	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	148	6	adams dc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	149	1	la rétractation d’un article en anesthésiologie: une	ORG
hypothesis-26528	150	1	j anaesth	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	151	1	2020;67(1):57-63	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	152	1	bozzo	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	152	2	bali k	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	152	3	ghert m. retractions	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	154	1	2017;2:5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	155	1	2017	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	156	1	017	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	156	2	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	156	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	156	4	2023 12	DATE
hypothesis-26528	157	1	chauvin	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	157	2	yordanov y.	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	159	1	2019;26(1):19	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	160	1	13	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	161	1	nassar gorra l	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	161	2	rodriguez al	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	161	3	trepka mj	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	161	4	madhivanan	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	161	5	fda	ORG
hypothesis-26528	161	6	2021	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	163	1	2019;179(4):582	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	164	1	doi:10.1001	GPE
hypothesis-26528	164	2	14	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	165	1	cochrane library	ORG
hypothesis-26528	167	1	cochrane	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	168	1	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	168	2	feb 10	DATE
hypothesis-26528	169	1	jpt	ORG
hypothesis-26528	169	2	lasserson t	ORG
hypothesis-26528	169	3	chandler j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	169	4	thomas j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	171	1	london	GPE
hypothesis-26528	171	2	england	GPE
hypothesis-26528	171	3	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	172	1	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	172	2	feb 10	DATE
hypothesis-26528	173	1	16	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	174	1	lefebvre c	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	174	2	glanville j	ORG
hypothesis-26528	174	3	featherstone r	ORG
hypothesis-26528	174	4	littlewood	ORG
hypothesis-26528	174	5	marshall c	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	175	1	4.s1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	176	1	chapter 4:	LAW
hypothesis-26528	177	1	higgins jpt	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	177	2	thomas j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	177	3	chandler j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	177	4	cumpston m	GPE
hypothesis-26528	177	5	li t	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	178	1	cochrane	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	178	2	63	DATE
hypothesis-26528	180	1	chichester	GPE
hypothesis-26528	180	2	uk	GPE
hypothesis-26528	180	3	john wiley	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	180	4	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	181	1	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	181	2	feb 10	DATE
hypothesis-26528	182	1	17	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	186	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	186	2	jul 21	DATE
hypothesis-26528	187	1	18	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	190	1	vienna	GPE
hypothesis-26528	190	2	austria	GPE
hypothesis-26528	190	3	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	190	4	19	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	191	1	rebala g	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	192	1	2019	DATE
hypothesis-26528	193	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	194	1	57–67	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	195	1	20	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	196	1	van de schoot	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	196	2	de bruin j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	196	3	schram	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	196	4	zahedi p	ORG
hypothesis-26528	196	5	de boer j	ORG
hypothesis-26528	198	1	nat mach intell	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	199	1	2021	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	199	2	doi:10.1038	ORG
hypothesis-26528	200	1	marshall ij	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	200	2	wallace bc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	201	1	syst	ORG
hypothesis-26528	201	2	2019	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	201	3	jul 11;8(1):163	DATE
hypothesis-26528	203	1	zhang y,	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	203	2	liang s	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	203	3	feng y	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	203	4	wang	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	203	5	sun f	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	203	6	chen s	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	204	1	syst	ORG
hypothesis-26528	204	2	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	204	3	jan 15;11(1):11	DATE
hypothesis-26528	204	4	8	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	205	1	35	DATE
hypothesis-26528	205	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	205	3	2023	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	206	1	brody s. scite	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	207	1	j med libr assoc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	208	1	2021	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	208	2	nov 22;109(4):707–10	DATE
hypothesis-26528	209	1	scite	ORG
hypothesis-26528	211	1	2022	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	211	2	nov 12	DATE
hypothesis-26528	212	1	25	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	213	1	wallace bc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	213	2	noel-storr	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	213	3	marshall ij	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	213	4	cohen am	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	213	5	thomas j.	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	215	1	2017 nov 1;24(6):1165–8	DATE
hypothesis-26528	216	1	doi:10.1093/jamia	ORG
hypothesis-26528	216	2	26	CARDINAL
hypothesis-26528	217	1	thomas j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	217	2	miwa	ORG
hypothesis-26528	218	1	syst	ORG
hypothesis-26528	218	2	2015 jan 14;4(1):5	DATE
hypothesis-26528	220	1	kiritchenko s	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	220	2	carini s	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	220	3	martin j	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	221	1	bmc med inform decis mak	ORG
hypothesis-26528	222	1	2010	DATE
hypothesis-26528	222	2	28;10(1):56	DATE
hypothesis-26528	223	1	6947-10-56 28	DATE
hypothesis-26528	224	1	marshall ij	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	224	2	wallace bc	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	224	3	robotreviewer	ORG
hypothesis-26528	226	1	2016 jan 1;23(1):193–201	DATE
hypothesis-26528	227	1	doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv044	ORG
hypothesis-26528	227	2	caitlin bakker	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	227	3	nicole theis-mahon	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	227	4	sarah jane brown	PERSON
hypothesis-26528	227	5	9	CARDINAL