id	sid	eid	entity	type
hypothesis-28745	1	1	peer reviewed article hypothesis	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	2	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	1	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	1	4	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	1	5	nlm pubmed	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	6	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	7	luke barron	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	8	mslsa	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	9	sophie nachman	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	10	mphb	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	11	rebecca carlson	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	12	health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	13	university of north carolina	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	14	chapel hill	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	15	chapel hill	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	16	north carolina	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	17	https://www.orcid.org/0009-0006-5288-193x	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	18	health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	19	university of north carolina	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	20	chapel hill	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	21	chapel hill	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	22	north carolina	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	23	https://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7357	DATE
hypothesis-28745	1	24	cpharmacy librarian	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	25	health sciences library	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	26	university of north carolina	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	27	chapel hill	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	28	chapel hill	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	29	north carolina	GPE
hypothesis-28745	1	30	https://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-8435	DATE
hypothesis-28745	1	31	barron l	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	32	carlson r.	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	1	33	nlm pubmed	ORG
hypothesis-28745	1	34	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	4	1	carlson	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	5	1	4.0	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	9	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	10	1	mailto:asnachman@outlook.com	ORG
hypothesis-28745	11	1	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/	ORG
hypothesis-28745	12	1	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	12	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	12	3	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	12	4	2010	DATE
hypothesis-28745	14	1	hedges3	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	14	2	methods4	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	17	1	three	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	17	2	75-95%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	18	1	reviews3	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	20	1	ovid	GPE
hypothesis-28745	21	1	the pubmed gold standard	ORG
hypothesis-28745	21	2	ovid medline	ORG
hypothesis-28745	22	1	nlm pubmed	ORG
hypothesis-28745	22	2	ovid	GPE
hypothesis-28745	24	1	ovid	ORG
hypothesis-28745	24	2	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	24	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	25	1	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	25	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	25	3	2025	DATE
hypothesis-28745	25	4	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	27	1	simulations[tiab	PRODUCT
hypothesis-28745	28	1	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	34	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	34	2	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	34	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	34	4	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	34	5	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	34	6	multi-disciplinary.ti	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	34	7	multioccupational.ti	ORG
hypothesis-28745	34	8	interoccupational.ti	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	42	1	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	44	1	multidisciplinary.tw	DATE
hypothesis-28745	45	1	relations"/	GPE
hypothesis-28745	46	1	educator.tw	DATE
hypothesis-28745	48	1	instruction.tw	DATE
hypothesis-28745	50	1	training.tw	DATE
hypothesis-28745	58	1	competence"/	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	2	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	3	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	4	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	5	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	6	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	7	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	8	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	9	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	58	10	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	59	1	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	59	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	59	3	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	59	4	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	59	5	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	59	6	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	59	7	ab	ORG
hypothesis-28745	60	1	nlm pubmed	ORG
hypothesis-28745	60	2	ovid medline	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	60	3	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	61	1	73-74%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	61	2	85%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	61	3	95-96%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	61	4	three	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	63	1	hedges3	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	64	1	ovid	GPE
hypothesis-28745	67	1	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	68	1	ovid medline elsevier	ORG
hypothesis-28745	68	2	73.43%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	3	73.43%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	4	73.86%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	5	83.98%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	6	83.98%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	7	84.47%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	8	96.48%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	9	96.48%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	68	10	95.45%	PERCENT
hypothesis-28745	72	1	1	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	73	1	interprofessional education & collaborative	ORG
hypothesis-28745	74	1	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	75	1	5	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	76	1	37	DATE
hypothesis-28745	76	2	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	76	3	2025	DATE
hypothesis-28745	76	4	2	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	76	5	cadet t	GPE
hypothesis-28745	78	1	journal of interprofessional care	ORG
hypothesis-28745	80	1	2024	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	80	2	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	80	3	12];38(3):476–85	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	81	1	3	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	82	1	carlson	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	82	2	mani n.	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	83	1	the medical library association	ORG
hypothesis-28745	85	1	2024 jan 11	DATE
hypothesis-28745	86	1	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	86	2	sep 12];112(1):33–41	DATE
hypothesis-28745	87	1	4	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	87	2	sampson m	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	87	3	zhang l	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	87	4	morrison	GPE
hypothesis-28745	87	5	nj	ORG
hypothesis-28745	87	6	clifford tj	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	87	7	platt rw	PERSON
hypothesis-28745	89	1	bmc med res methodol	ORG
hypothesis-28745	90	1	2006	DATE
hypothesis-28745	90	2	2025	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	91	1	6	CARDINAL
hypothesis-28745	91	2	https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice	NORP
hypothesis-28745	92	1	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13561820.2023.2283119	PERSON