IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 316 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License *Corresponding Author: dr.huda_hm2029@yahoo.com Abstract Some nonlinear differential equations with fractional order are evaluated using a novel approach Sumudu and Adomian Decomposition technique (STADM). To get the results of the given model, the Sumudu transformation and iterative technique are employed. The suggested method has an advantage over alternative strategies in that it does not require for additional resources or calculations. This approach works well, easy to use, and yield good results. Besides, the solution graphs are plotted using MATLAB software. Also, the true solution of the fractional Newell-Whitehead equation is shown together with the approximate solutions of STADM. The results showed our approach is a great way, fantastic, reliable and easy method to deal with specific problems in a variety of applied sciences and engineering fields. Keywords: Sumudu Transformation, Caputo derivative, Fractional Calculus, Approximate solutions, Decomposition method. 1. Introduction Partial differential equations with fractional order (FPDEs) are a modification of integer order differential equations. The study of FPDEs has attracted more attention recently. The fractional approach has developed into a powerful modeling technique that is frequently used in the fields of chaotic dynamics, wave propagation, turbulence, turbulent flow, diffusion processes, [1]-[4]. Because some fractional order models cannot be tested analytically and the results for FPDEs should be have. Many researchers have focused on developing effective and reliable techniques for FPDEs which include Laplace transform [7], Laplace Variational method (LVIM) [8], perturbation method [9], and differential transform method [5], Variational iteration method [6], and many others. Several analytical and approximation methods using SVIM solving nonlinear problems of fractional order [9,10], and others[11-17] have been proposed. In this Work, we applied a new mixture which is a graceful coupling of two strong approaches STADM for solving fractional-order Nonlinear PDES . doi.org/10.30526/36.3.3241 Article history: Received 26 January 2023, Accepted 20 February 2023, Published in July 2023. Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences Journal homepage: jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq Analytical Solutions to Investigate Fractional Newell-Whitehead Nonlinear Equation using Sumudu Transform Decomposition Method Jasem Hussein Qays Education of CollegeDepartment of Mathematics, University of ,thamHai-Al Ibn Science Pure for Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. qaisalsaadm@gmail.com Huda Omran Altaie* Education of eCollegDepartment of Mathematics, University of ,thamHai-Al Ibn Science Pure for Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. dr.huda_hm2029@yahoo.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ mailto:dr.huda_hm2029@yahoo.com http://en.uobaghdad.edu.iq/?page_id=15060 http://en.uobaghdad.edu.iq/?page_id=15060 mailto:qaisalsaadm@gmail.com mailto:qaisalsaadm@gmail.com http://en.uobaghdad.edu.iq/?page_id=15060 http://en.uobaghdad.edu.iq/?page_id=15060 mailto:dr.huda_hm2029@yahoo.com mailto:dr.huda_hm2029@yahoo.com IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 317 2. Idea of Sumudu Transform and Decomposition Approach (STADM): The STADM is discussed in this section as it relates to solving FPDEs. The following general FPDEs as: ๐ท๐‘ก ๐‘คy(x, t) + Ly(x, t) + Ny(x, t) = q(x, t) , x โ‰ฅ 0, t > 0 , n โˆ’ 1 < ๐‘ค โ‰ค n โ€ฆ.(1) With the initial conditions y(x, 0) = g(x) or โˆ‚ry(x,0) โˆ‚ tr = g(r)(x, 0) = gr(x) ,โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ (2) r = 0,1, โ€ฆ โ€ฆ . . n โˆ’ 1 The Caputo fractional derivative๐ท๐‘ก ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) of ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) denoted below: ๐œ•๐‘ค ๐œ•๐‘ก๐‘ค ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = { 1 ฮ“(n โˆ’ w) โˆซ (๐‘ก โˆ’ ๐‘ ) ๐‘›โˆ’๐‘คโˆ’1 ๐œ•๐‘›๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ ) ๐œ•๐‘ก๐‘› ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 < ๐‘ค < ๐‘› ๐‘ก 0 ๐œ•๐‘›๐‘ฆ (๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) ๐œ•๐‘ก๐‘› ๐‘ค = ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ } Taking Sumudu transform of the Eq. (1), we have: ๐‘†[๐ท๐‘ก ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] + ๐‘†[๐‘…[๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]] + ๐‘†[๐‘[๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]] = ๐‘†[๐‘ž(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ.(3) The property of Sumudu transform of function derivatives used, then ๐‘†[๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] ๐‘ข๐‘ค = โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, 0)๐‘˜ ๐‘ข๐‘คโˆ’๐‘˜ + ๐‘†[๐‘ž(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] โˆ’ ๐‘›โˆ’1 ๐‘˜=0 ๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)) + ๐‘(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก))] ๐‘†[๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] = ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, 0) + ๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐‘ž(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] โˆ’ ๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)) + ๐‘(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก))] (4) Application of Sumudu inverse transform on Eq. (4) yielded: ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = ๐‘“(๐‘ฅ) + ๐‘†โˆ’1(๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘† [๐‘ž(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]) โˆ’ ๐‘†โˆ’1(๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) + ๐‘(๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]) (5) The representation of the solution for Eq. (5) as an infinite series is given below: ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) โˆž ๐‘–=0 (6) And the nonlinear term is being decomposed as: ๐‘[๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)] = โˆ‘ ๐ด๐‘–(๐‘ฆ0, ๐‘ฆ1, โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฆ๐‘–) โˆž ๐‘–=0 (7) Where, ๐ด๐‘– are the Adomian polynomials of functions ๐‘ฆ0, ๐‘ฆ1, โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฆ๐‘– can be calculated by formula given as: ๐ด๐‘– = 1 ๐‘–! ๐œ•๐‘– ๐œ•๐œ†๐‘– [๐‘ (โˆ‘ ๐œ†๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘– โˆž ๐‘–=0 )] ๐œ†=0 Substituting Eqs. (6) and (7) in Eq. (5): IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 318 โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) โˆž ๐‘–=0 = โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, 0)(๐‘˜) ๐‘ข๐‘คโˆ’๐‘˜ โˆž ๐‘˜=0 + ๐‘†โˆ’1(๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐‘ž(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]) โˆ’ ๐‘†โˆ’1 [๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘† [๐ฟ (โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) โˆž ๐‘–=0 ) + โˆ‘ ๐ด๐‘– โˆž ๐‘–=0 ]] (8) Simplification of Eq. (7) as many times as possible resulted into series solution, we get: ๐‘ฆ0(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, 0)(๐‘˜) ๐‘ข๐‘คโˆ’๐‘˜ โˆž ๐‘˜=0 + ๐‘†โˆ’1(๐‘ ๐‘ค๐‘†[๐‘”(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)]) ๐‘ฆ1(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ’๐‘† โˆ’1[๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ0(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)) + ๐ด0]] ๐‘ฆ2(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ’๐‘† โˆ’1 [๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ1(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)) + ๐ด1]] โ‹ฎ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ’๐‘† โˆ’1[๐‘ข๐‘ค๐‘†[๐ฟ(๐‘ฆ๐‘–โˆ’1(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก)) + ๐ด๐‘–]] Finally, the iteration ๐‘ฆ0, ๐‘ฆ1, โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฆ๐‘– were obtained and we approximate the analytical solution ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) by truncated series ๐‘ฆ(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) = โˆ‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–(๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ก) โˆž ๐‘–=0 . 3. Test Example: The test example shows the reliable and efficient of STADM. All results are calculated using the software MATLAB R2021b. Example 3.1:Consider Newell-Whitehead PDES as follows: โˆ‚w y(x,t) โˆ‚tw โˆ’ โˆ‚2 y (x,t) โˆ‚ x2 = y (x, t) โˆ’ y3 (x, t) โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..(9) With initial condition y (x, 0) = 1 2 [1 + tan h ( x 2โˆš2 )] โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..(10) And the true solution y (x, t) = 1 2 [1 + tan h ( โˆš2x+3t 4 )] Solution : The Adomain polynomials for the nonlinear terms โˆ’y3 Can be computed as follows: By using Eq.(10), we have A0 = โˆ’y0 3 A1 = โˆ’3 y0 2 y1 A2 = โˆ’3(y0 2 y2 + y0 y1 2) A3 = โˆ’(3(y0 2 y3 + 6y0 y1 y2 + y1 3 ) y0(x, t) = 1 2 1 + tan h x 2โˆš2 IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 319 We determine the terms below using the same pattern: The analytical solution is provided by: y๐‘›(x, t) = y0(x, t) + y1(x, t) + y2(x, t) + y3(x, t) y๐‘›(x, t) = 1 2 1 + tan h x 2โˆš2 + 3 8 sech2 x 2 โˆš2 . t๐›ผ ฮฑ โˆ’ 9 4 sin h4 x 2โˆš2 csc h3 x โˆš2 . tฮฑ ฮฑ 2 + 9 128 . tฮฑ ฮฑ 3 . cosh x โˆš2 โˆ’ 2 sech4 x 2โˆš2 Where n = 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 for the set of ๐›ผ values that applied in this example, which are 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1. 4. Results The following Figures present the absolute error at t=0.002 with various value of x . We employ a few terms to approximate the solution, and the suggested approach, FSTADM, has a high convergence order and higher accuracy. Similarly, Figure4.1โ€“Figure4.6 show the 3D exact and achieved results are plotted at ๐›ผ =0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1. All the accurate and approximate results on the graphs have shown are much closed and indicates the validity of the present technique. Figure 4.1: ABS error of the solutions at ๐›ผ=0.4,0.6,0.8,1. y2(x, t) = โˆ’ 9 4 sin h4 x 2โˆš2 csc h3 x โˆš2 . tw w 2 y3(x, t) = 9 128 . tw w 3 . cosh x โˆš2 โˆ’ 2 sech4 x 2โˆš2 IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 320 Figure4.2: Approximate solutions ym at ๐›ผ=0.4,0.6,0.8 and 1 and exact solution . Figure 4.3: The 3D approximate solutions plots at ๐›ผ = 0.4 , 0.6 , 0.8 and 1. IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 321 Figure 4.4: The 3D absolute solution plots. 5. Conclusion It is difficult to find analytical solutions to some FPDEs with initial and boundary conditions, so the solution here rarely exists. Here, the solutions of the time-fractional Newell- Whitehead equation are made successfully. The results are convergent and much closed to the true solutions. The results are shown through 2D and 3D at various fractional-orders. So, the presented method has an excellent convergent rate and can be used to solve non-linear applications. References 1. I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1998. 2. R. Metzler and J. Klafter, ``The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion:Afractional dynamics approach,'' Phys. Rep., 2000, vol. 339, pp. 1_77, Dec.. 3. D. Baleanu and J. H. Kamil, ``A novel approach for Korteweg-de Vries equation of fractional order,'' J. Appl. Comput. Mech., 2019, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 192_198. 4. H. K. Jassim, ``The approximate solutions of three-dimensional diffusion and wave equations within local fractional derivative operator,'' in Abstract and Applied Analysis. London, U.K.: Hindawi, 2016. 5. H. K. Jassim, ``Homotopy perturbation algorithm using Laplace transform for Newell- Whitehead-Segel equation,'' Int. J. Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 2015, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 8_12. 6. F. Evirgen, ``Analyze the optimal solutions of optimization problems by means of fractional gradient based system using VIM,'' Int. J. Optim.Control, Theories Appl., vol. 6, pp. 75_83, 2016. IHJPAS. 36 (3) 2023 322 7. A. Atangana, D. Boleanu, Nonlinear fractional Jaulent-Miodek and Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations within Sumudu transform, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013. 8. S. S. Ray, R. K. Bera, An approximate solution of a nonlinear fractional differential equation by Adomian decomposition method , Appl. Math. Comput., 167 (2005). 9. Javeed, S.; Baleanu, D.; Waheed, A.; Khan, M.S.; Affan, H. Analysis of homotopyperturbation method for solving fractional order differential equations. Mathematics 2019, 7, 40. 10. Ali, H.M. An efficient approximate-analytical method to solve time-fractional KdV and KdVB equations. Inf. Sci. Lett. 2020, 9, 189โ€“198. 11. HH Omran, Solutins of Systems for the Linear Fredholm-Volterra Integral Equations of the Second Kind, Ibn AL-Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Science, 2017, 23,2,200-206. 12. Maad G.M and Huda Omran Altaie, Study on Approximate Analytical Methods For Nonlinear Differential Equations, Journal of interdisciplinary mathematics, 2022, Vol 25,Issue 8. 13. 13. Maad G.M and Huda Omran Altaie, Efficient Analytical Method For The Solution of Some Fractional -Order Nonlinear Differential Equations, International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, july 2022. 14. Maad G.M and Huda Omran Altaie, A new Technique for Solving Fractional Nonlinear Equations by Sumudu Transform and Adomian Decomposition Method , Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied sciences,, 20 july 2022. 15. Huda Omran Altaie, Two Efficient Methods For Solving Non-linear Fourth-Order PDEs, International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 2020, Volume 11, 543-546. 16. Fadhel S.Fadhel_ , Huda Omran Altaie, Solution of Riccati Matrix Differential Equation Using New Approach of Variational Iteration Method, Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 12 (2021). 17. Maad Gatea Mousa, APPROXIMATE-ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR SOLVING NON- LINEAR EQUATIONS WITH ITS APPLICATIONS , thesis, 2022. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/681d96fa27e13411 https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/681d96fa27e13411 https://ijnaa.semnan.ac.ir/ https://ijnaa.semnan.ac.ir/ https://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/Home_Page https://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/Home_Page https://ijnaa.semnan.ac.ir/