The particular dialect or language that a person chooses to use on any occasion is called a code Learning Style in Language Learning Classroom Masruddin anthosmithstain@yahoo.com Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia Received: 3 Oktober 2018; Accepted : 30 November 2018 URL : http://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ideas Abstract This article describes the concept of learning style and the learners’ characteristic of each learning style of students in language learning. In the first part of this article the writer describes the learning style. Then the writer will related the learning style to language acquisition. There are 3 types of language learning style described by Tekavcic and Dimovski namely visual, auditory and tactile funtions of someone in processing information. The three main types of learning style are not absolute, of course. Many learners learn through a variety of senses. Certain students might equally be strong in the three perceptual modalities, or in two perceptual modalities of either combination Keywords: Learning Style, Language Learning language 114 Copyright © 2018 The Author IDEAS is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 License Issued by English study program of IAIN Palopo IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) Volume 6, Number 2, December 2018 pp. 114 – 124 http://u.lipi.go.id/1457703302 IDEAS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2018 ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) Introduction The new area of second language research concerns with learning styles. Learning styles are likely to influence how the student respond and benefit from a given instructional program, while many teachers ignore the possibility to use their own learning styles in the classroom. It should be realized that the teachers have their own preferred learning styles and that teachers have responsibility to identify the preferred learning style each learner has. Beside that the learners must be encouraged to develop independence inside and outside classrooms. They must be equipped with the means to guide themselves, so that they can take on responsibility for learning. This research describes the concept of learning style and the learners’ characteristic of each learning style of students in language learning. In the first part of this article the writer describes the learning style. Then the writer will related the learning style to language acquisition. There are 3 types of language learning style described by Tekavcic and Dimovski namely visual, auditory and tactile functions of someone in processing information. The three main types of learning style are not absolute, of course. Many learners learn through a variety of senses. Certain students might equally be strong in the three perceptual modalities, or in two perceptual modalities of either combination Learning Styles: An Overview Proficiency in a second language could not merely be described in terms of structures, phonology, morphology and lexicon of target language. This kind of knowledge is not adequate for the learners who learn a second language for utility function. In foreign language classroom or in second language acquisition, we should acknowledge that learners differ in a wide variety of ways. These differences are usually called individual differences. The students’ individual differences in second language classroom can be age, aptitude, motivation, attitude, learning style, and personality style. One of the individual differences: learning style will be the main concern of this study. Concept of Learning Style Learning Style as consisting of distinctive behavior which serve as indicators how a person learns from an adapt to this environment. It also gives clues to how a person’s mind operates (Gregore, 1979: 324). Dunn (1984: 45) 115 Masruddin: Learning Style In Language Learning Classroom stated that learning style represents each person biologically and experientially Inducing characteristics that either foster or inhibit achievement. On the surface the concepts of learning style appear to be contradictory. The notion of learning style implies individual differences. As pointed out,learning style is pervasive quality in the learning strategies or the learning behavior of an individual (Reid, 1987:89). A basic assumption underlying the devolvement of learning style instrument is the existence of individual is differences. Learning style instruments are designed to distinguish on kind of learner from another. If all students learned in the same manner, learning style inventories would be unnecessary. Language teacher should understand what learning style is. Learning style is one of the factors that may affect the learning process in second languange acquisition. Different experts have different concept of learning style. The following are some diffrent definitions of learning styles. a. Learning style describes a student in terms of those educational conditions under which he/she is most likely to learn. Learning Style describes how a students learns, not what he has learned. Hunt then narrow his definition by dealing with how much structure needs in order to learn best (Hunt, 1979:27). b. Learning style has been defined as ”cognitive, affective, and physiological traits that are relatively stable indicators of how learners perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning environment (Keefe, 1979:4). c. Learning style is defined as preferred or habitual patterns of mental functioning and dealing with new information (Ehrman, 1990:311). All of definitions above actually share a similar concept, but they are expressed in different ways that is the way in which each person has preferences for the ways they like to absorb and retains new information which can change his/her behavior. Theories of learning The starting point of all language teaching should be understood of how people learn(theories of learning). Identifies the devolvement in learning theory into five main stages; behaviorism, mentalism, cognitive code, affective factor, and learning and acquisition (Hutchinson, 1987:39). a. Behaviorism The theory point out that learning is a mechanical process of habit sequence. This method laid down a set of guiding methodological principles, based on the behaviorist stimulus-response and secondly assumption that second formation and proceeds by means of the frequent reinforcement of a stimulus-response learning should reflect and imitate the perceived process of mother tongue learning. It also implies that a teacher should expose learning activities and language inputs which can stimulate to interest, react and 116 IDEAS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2018 ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) communicate they are learning. b. Mentalism Chomsky concluded that thinking must be ruled-governed; a finite, and fairly small, set of rules enables the mind the deal with the potentially infinite range of experiences it may encounter (Hutchinson, 1987:42). This can also be hypothesized that when a learner has a good commanding structure, he/she will easily masret the target language he/she learning. c. Cognitive code This theory views learners as thinking beings. Learning as a process in which the learners actively try to make sense of data, and data can be said to have taken place when the learners have managed to impose sort of meaningful interpretation or patterns on the data. The basic teaching-technique as associated with a cognitive theory of language learning is the problem- solving task. d. The affective factors This stage views learners as emotional beings. People do not only think,but also have feelings. Learning, particularly the learning of a language is an emotional experience, and the feeling that the learning process evokes will have a crucial bearing on the success or failure of the learning.The importance emotional factor is easily seen if we consider the relationship between the cognitive and affective aspect of learning one of vital important elements in foreign language setting,especially in the development of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) e. Learning and acquisition Krashen in Hutchinson (1987:49) made distinction between learning and acquisition. Learning is seen as a conscious process, while acquisition proceeds unconsciously. For second language learning, both processes are likely to play in useful part. Types of Learning Style Barsch in Davis (1989:6) stated that approaches learning style from the point of view for perceptual modality preferences. There are three main types of learning style: 1. Visual learners Learn more effectively through the eyes (seeing). A visual learner usually works best alone or perhaps with one another person, for reading and reviewing, visual learners well from seeing words in books. They remember and understand information and instruction better if the teachers read them. Visual learners do not need much oral explanation as auditory if they want to remember information. The visual learners often times prefers to be left alone in 117 Masruddin: Learning Style In Language Learning Classroom his own space to read or to study quietly as far away as possible from a verbal learner who needs to discuss everything. They should take every opportunity to write down or to draw the incoming auditory information. They will also translate the given information into either words or pictures. 1. Auditory learners Learn more effectively through the ear (hearing). Auditory learners may benefit from soft background music. Auditory learners learn from hearing words spoken and from oral explanation. They may remember information by reading a loud or moving their lips as they read especially when they are learning new material. The auditory learners learn benefit from hearing audiotapes lectures and class discussion. The auditory learner is one who can learn best by hearing, listening, or speaking. This type of learner does not necessarily make pictures in his mind but will clarify the given information through his listening and repeating skill. It comprises the listening learner and the auditory learner. 2. Tactile learner Learn more effectively through the sense of touch (hands on). Tactile learners learn best when they have the opportunity to do “hands on” experiences with materials. That is,working on experiments in a laboratory, handling and building models, and touching and working with materials provide them with the most successful learning situation. Writing notes or instructions can help them remember information, and physical involvement in class related activities may help them understand new information. The tactile learner usually needs more concrete experiences to learn what is being taught. In a classroom setting they may learn best if the assignments are geared to hands on activities (experiments, concrete materials, trial error,and trips). The three main types of learning style are not absolute, of course. Many learners learn through a variety of senses. Certain students might equally be strong in the three perceptual modalities, or in two perceptual modalities of either combination. How to Identify Learning Style Learning Style Inventory which is simple test helps the students understand the strength and the weakness as learners. He approaches learning style from the point of view perceptual modality preferences. It consist 30 questions based on leading to perceptual modalities (Davis, 1989:6). In this research, the writer used Learning Style Inventory, the choice is based on that the learning styles based on the perceptual modality preference can sufficiently reveal the prominent characteristics of an individual learners in learning, and more importantly that those learning style have clear practical relationship with the media, kind of materials, how the implemetation. Identification is done to knowing the learning style or we can say for grouping purposes. Many teachers ignore the possibility the students are not learning 118 IDEAS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2018 ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) because they are not opportunity to use their own style of learning classroom. Concept Language Acquistion Before discussing the second language acquisition, it is necessary to have a clear notion of what language acquisition. It seems that they do not have opinion about it. They view language acquisition from different points of views as reveal in the following: a. Richard (1985:3) reveals that language acquisition is the process by which a person learns a language. It is called acquisition because some linguist believes that the development of the first language in a child is special process. b. David (1991:5) reveals that language acquisition refers to the process or result of learning a particular aspect of language, and finally the language as a whole. Acquisition is also used in the context of learning a foreign language. Foreing or second language acquisition is thus distinguished from first language or mother tongue acquisition. In this context, acquisition is sometimes opposed to “learning”. The former is viewed a sub conscious, natural process, which is the primary force behind foreign language fluency. The latter is seen as conscious process which monitors the progress of acquisition and guides the performance of the speaker. c. Krashen (1987:10) distinguished between acquisition and learning language. Acquisition acquired first and second languages. It is a sub conscious process; language communication and usually aware of the fact that they are using the language communication and they acquired competence is also sub conscious. In addition, acquisition includes implicit learning, informal learning, and natural lerning. Whereas “learning” includes formal knowledge of a language, explicit learning. He further states that language acquisition is also available to the adults’ second language performer. d. Bahri (1997:14) reveals that acquisition although sometimes is distinguished from learning, is used in the present study follow must researchers in the field who use it, as the super ordinate term both acquisition and learning. He further states that we do retain the term learners to refer to those in the process of acquiring a second language20. Based on the opinion of the experts above, the writer can conclude that language acquisition is the process of acquiring of the first language and the second or foreign language. Concepts of Second Language Acquisition Second language acquisition is a process of enermous complexity in which a variety of factors are at work and which evades description, let alone explanation (Klein, 1986:23). The systematic study of how people acquire second language is a fairly recently phenomenon beloging to the second half of twentieth. At first sight, the meaning of the term ‘second language acquisition’ seems transparent but, in 119 Masruddin: Learning Style In Language Learning Classroom fact it requires careful explanation. For one thing, in this context ‘second’ can refer to any language that is learned subsequent to the mother tongue. Also ‘second’ is not intended to contrast with ‘foreign’. Whether you are learning a language naturally as a result of living in a result of living in a country where it spoken, or learning it in a classroom through instruction, it is customary to speak generally of ‘second’ language acquisition. Second language acquisition, then can be defined as the way in which people learn a language other than their mother tongue, inside or outside of classroom, and SLA (Second Language Acquisition) as the study of this. Learning Style in Second Language Acquisition The physical elements of learning style all need to be considered when one teachers. Learning style in second language acquisition might prefer auditory, visual and tactile or combination learning. The students’ ESL (English as a Second Language) seems to be on the right track in addressing students’ preceptual learning styles. Knowledge of one’s own learning style is fundamental in “learning to learn.” Students can be expected to acquire succesful language acquisition strategies study methods, or colloberative learning skill. Assumptions on Perceptual Learning Style Perceptual learning style described by Tekavcic and Dimovski as a domination of visual, auditory and tactile funtions of someone in processing information. The following are the characteristics of each type of learner (Dunn, 2003:1). A visual learner is characterized by mind sometimes strays during verbal activities, observes, rather than talks or acts; may be quite by nature, organized in approach to tasks, like to read, usually a good speller, memorize by creating mental images, thinks in pictures, easily put off by visual distraction, finds verbal instructions difficult remembers faces strong on first impressions, likes drawing and doodling, may have good handwriting, enjoys using color, notices details, often a quick thinker, and may focus on the ‘big picture’ and use advanced planning. An auditory learner generally talks to self aloud, outgoing by nature, whispers to self while reading, may hum or sing while working, like to be read to, memorizes by steps in a sequence, very aware of rhythm, easily distracted by noises, may have difficulty with written materials, remembers names, may assess people by the sound of their voice, enjoys music and the sounds of words, enjoys talking and listening, and may need time to think (discuss with himself/herself). A tactile learner generally in nation most of the time/fidgety, out going by 120 IDEAS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2018 ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) nature, expresses emotion by physical means, will try new things-likes to get involved, reading is not a priority, may find spelling difficult, like to solve problem by physically working through them, enjoy oppertunities to work collaboratively with a partner or a small group on a task, remember what they have dont rather than seen/heard, enjoys handling objects, enjoys doing activities, and may need time to think (e.g. process the action involved). After having identified the characteristics of the three modalities of perceptual learning preference, it can be found that auditory, visual, and tactile styles are contrasted in several ways. These three types of learning styles is the main concern of this study. Visual style refers to a preference for learning through vision. Visual learners rely on their sight to take in information and they will lose focus during oral lectures. In contract, auditory style refers to the use of hearing sense in getting information. Auditory learners can often follow verbal instructions very well and retain new information better when they talk it out. Those contrastive differences usually bring about serious problem for language teachers in presenting the material. The materials for visual learners may not be suitable for auditory learners and vice versa. An acceptance of learning style differences demands an approach than develops skills through strengths. Once lecturers become aware that different students learn differently, they will be able to accommondate approaches by considering students’ different learning styles (Guild, 2001). In foreign language classroom, learning style is one of determinant factor for the succes of english learners. Matching students’ learning style preferences to specific learning activities can improve learning outcames. Student tend to apply and transform the information received into a “styles” that matches their strength, based on their experiences and ability. Every learner will have different ways in developing or organizing her or his ideas in a piece of writing task. Some learners may preper to use the deductive thingking style while others may prefer to use the inductive ones. Some will prefer to use contrasting in adding details into their paragraphs. Maybe some learners wil choose to put their topic sentence at the beginning of the paragraph while others will choose to put it at the end of the paragraph. Prhaps some learners prefer to describe their ideas of what they have seen while others from what they have heard. The tendence may very according the way they perceive information and process it in their minds. The way to communicate the ideas given in the paragraph development will also vary according to their communication styles and ability. Felder (2004:103) claimed that learning style are not affected by educational background, however, there might be some barriers protecting them againts producing a good quality of writing based on their perceptual learnig style, such as IQ, prior knowledge of writing skills, knowledge of the target language specially vocabulary and structure element, and socio-psychological and physiological factors. 121 Masruddin: Learning Style In Language Learning Classroom Learning Styles and Memory Learning styles have closely related to memory. Davis (1989:56) claimed that learning styles such as visual, auditory and tactile are come in sensory memory. The sensory memory is the place where the information enters brain through individuals’ senses. If the learning styles suitable with individuals’ strenghts, there will be come attention, and then the information can be proccesed to short-term memory. Past studies on learning styles and memory found that linking memory and learning styles together depends upon several factors. These factors are background knowledge, interest level, physical state, and emotional state. It is important to know where the learner in regards to these factors to achieve the ultimate learning experience. Kratzig and Arbuthott suggest that halping individuals learn effective memory strategies across all stimulus modalities and context would be benifical in learning process (Kratzig, 2003:16). In general, the result of identifying learning style demonstrated that an individual’s style preference influences the types of learning strategies that she or he employs in acquiring a foreign language. By knowing the learning styles of the learners, the teacher will make groups according to the learners learning styles or we can say for grouping purpose (Harmer, 1991:34). In Learning Foreign Language students expressed in different ways that is the way in which each person has preferences for the ways they like to sbsorb and retains new information, which can change his/her behavior. Learning style has the elements of individual qualities, activities and behaviour that are maintained over a long period of time or an individual’s natural, habitual and preferred ways and skill, regardless of teaching methods and content area. Models of learning style can be classified into demensional model of perceptual, cognitive, and effective. Perceptual learning style is the physical and sensory elements that a learner user to interpret external stimuli which are commonly known as visual, auditory, and tactile cultural and gender differences. Beside that in teaching ESL (English as a Second Language) vocabulary also important thing to know for the learners because vocabulary as stated in the definition is a stock of word language. Whatever the style of learning of students may have, they are considered to be an important alement in language teaching. Knowing students’ learning styles enables teachers to design approaches and methods in teaching a language. Conclusion The result of identifying learning style demonstrated that an individual’s style preference influences the types of learning strategies that she or he 122 IDEAS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2018 ISSN 2338-4778 (Print) ISSN 2548-4192 (Online) employs in acquiring a foreign language. By knowing the learning styles of the learners, the teacher will make groups according to the learners learning styles or we can say for grouping purpose (Harmer, 1991:34). In Learning Foreign Language students expressed in different ways that is the way in which each person has preferences for the ways they like to sbsorb and retains new information, which can change his/her behavior. Learning style has the elements of individual qualities, activities and behaviour that are maintained over a long period of time or an individual’s natural, habitual and preferred ways and skill, regardless of teaching methods and content area There are 3 types of language learning style described by Tekavcic and Dimovski namely visual, auditory and tactile funtions of someone in processing information. The three main types of learning style are not absolute, of course. Many learners learn through a variety of senses. Certain students might equally be strong in the three perceptual modalities, or in two perceptual modalities of either combination. Whatever the style of learning of students may have, they are considered to be an important alement in language teaching. Knowing students’ learning styles enables teachers to design approaches and methods in teaching a language. References Bahri, M. Arifin. 1997. Learning Strategy in Second language Acquisition by Indonesian Adult Learners of English. Outline of Research for Dissertation. Ujung Pandang. Hasanuddin University. Candling, Cook. 1991. Towards Task Based Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs New Jersey . Prentice Hall. David, C. 1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Cambridge, Basic Blackwell. Davis, E.C. 1989. An Integrated Skill Approach, Ujung Pandang, Hasanuddin University . Dictionary. 2009. com. http://dictionary.com/browse/ vocabulary Dunn, R.2003. The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model and Its Theoretical Cornerstone. In Rita Dunn and Shirley A Griggs (Eds). Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model Research Who, what, when, where, and so what?. Chapter 1.,PP 1-6 NY: St John’s University’s Centre for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. Dunn. 1984. Learning Style: State of the Science. Prentice Hall, New York. Ehrman, M.E. &Oxford, R.L. 1990. Adult Language Learning Style and Strategies in an Intensive Training Setting: Modern Language Journal. Felder. 2004. Learning Style. London and New York, Longman Group.. Good, Carter, V. 1973. Dictionary of Education. New York, Mc Graw Hill Book Company. Inc. 123 http://dictionary.com/browse/ Masruddin: Learning Style In Language Learning Classroom Gregore, A.F. 1979. Learning/ Teaching Style. Their Nature and Effects. Students Learning Style. Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs. Revston, NASSP. Guild, P.B. 2001. Diversity Learning Styles and Culture. Retrieved on May 16, 2009 from www. Newhorizons.org/strategies/styles/front_styles.htm. Harmer, J. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London and New York, Longman Group. Hornby, AS. 1974. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. New York, Oxford University Press. Hunt, D.E. 1979. Learning Style Students Need and Introducing to Conceptual Level in Students’ Learning styles, Diagnosing and Prescribing Program. Reston, VA National SSP. Husain, D. 1999. Learning Styles and Personality Styles in Second language Acquisition. English Language Studies. Post Graduate Hasanuddin University. Hutchinson. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Keefe.J.W. 1979. Learning Style: An Overview. In J.W. Keefe (Ed), Students Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Program. Reston. VA. National Association of Secondary School Principals. Klein, W. 1986. Second Language Acquisition. London : Cambridge University Press. Krashen., G and Arbuthnott, K. 2003. Perceptual Learning Style and Learning Proficiency: A test of the Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Kratzig, 2003. Language Learning. Hongkong, Longman Group. Rasyid., M.A. 1992. Developing Communicative Competence through Topics of Interest and Learning Styles Using the Integrated Skill Approach. Ujung Pandang. Postgraduate Studies Program Hasanuddin University Reid, J. 1995. Learning Styles in the ESL/ EFL Classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle Publishers. Richard, J. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistic. Hongkong, Longman Group. 124