Iguana 10.3 color covers (Page C1) A lthough few iguanas in the genus Ctenosaura are actually black (this occurs only in some individual C. acan- thura and C. pectinata), one of the com- mon names by which they are collectively known is “Black Iguanas.” This name is actually mislead- ing when referring to some of the smaller, more colorful species (e.g., C. alfredschmidti, C. defen- sor, and C. flavidorsalis). Another common name used in English for species in this genus is “Spiny- tailed Iguanas.” In Central America, Black Iguanas are called “Garrobos” or “Iguanas Negras.” Local inhabi- tants of the Islas de la Bahia (Utila, Roatan, and Guanaja), located off the northern coast of Honduras, call the species that occur there, “Wishiwillies,” and, on the Isla de la Providencia, they are known as “Ishillies.” The phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of iguanas have provoked considerable controversy in recent years. In 1988, eight monophyletic2 groups were shown to exist within what had been considered the Family Iguanidae. Shortly there- after, these were elevated to eight distinct families, largely because no evidence could be found for the monophyly of the entire family. This new classifi- cation was heavily criticized and eventually reversed on the basis of molecular genetic studies. However, after a very recent revision of the origi- nal study, which, among other things, now showed eleven monophyletic groups of iguanian lizards, the controversy continues. Some experts believe that all pleurodont iguanian lizards should be included in a single family (Iguanidae sensu lato) and that the monophyletic subgroupings should be treated as subfamilies (e.g., the subfamily Iguaninae). In contrast, other experts think that real relationships are better portrayed by recogniz- ing eleven separate families, one of which includes the “true” iguanas (Iguanidae sensu stricto). Accordingly, lizards in the genus Ctenosaura are placed either in the subfamily Iguaninae (in the Family Iguanidae sensu lato) or in the Family Iguanidae (sensu stricto). Regardless of taxonomic rank, this group also includes the Marine Iguanas (Amblyrhynchus), Rock Iguanas (Cyclura), Fiji Iguanas (Brachylophus), Galapagos Land Iguanas (Conolophus), Desert Iguanas (Dipsosaurus), Green Iguanas (Iguana), and Chuckwallas (Sauromalus). The genus Ctenosaura is differentiated from the other genera within the family (or subfamily) by the presence of an extremely long subocular scale and whorls of enlarged, spiky scales on the tail. Ctenosaurs are most closely related to lizards in the genera Iguana and Cyclura. In recent years, tremendous advances have been made in the systematics of Ctenosaura. Seventeen species are currently recognized: C. acanthura, C. alfredschmidti, C. bakeri, C. clarki, C. conspicuosa, C. defensor, C. flavidor- salis, C. hemilopha, C. macrolopha, C. melanos- terna, C. nolascensis, C. oaxacana, C. oedirhina, C. palearis, C. pectinata, C. quinquecarinata, and C. similis. As recently as 1928, 13 species were rec- ognized, but subsequent workers determined that the species C. brachylopha, C. brevirostris, and C. parkeri were actually C. pectinata; and, more recently, C. erythromelas was subsumed within C. defensor, reducing the number to only nine. More recently described species (the most recent in 2001) have elevated the number to the current 17. Black Iguanas: Name and Systematics1 Gunther Köhler1, AJ Gutman2, and Robert Powell3 1Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt a/M., Germany; 2West Hartford, Connecticut, USA; 3Department of Biology, Avila University, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. 79IGUANASeptember 2003 1 Adapted from Köhler, G. 2002. Schwarzleguane. Lebensweise, Pflege, Zucht. Herpeton Verlag Elke Köhler, Offenbach, Germany. Translated from German by AJ Gutman with additional commentary by Robert Powell. 2 A “monophyletic” group includes an ancestor and all of its descendants. In the past, some species (C. bakeri, C. palearis, C. quinquecarinata, C. clarki, and C. defensor) were split off from Ctenosaura and placed in a separate genus, Enyaliosaurus, but this division is no longer widely recognized. More recent studies, based on genetic and morphologi- cal data, have presented an hypothesis of relation- ships within the genus Ctenosaura that recognizes three monophyletic species groups designated as subgenera (Ctenosaura, Enyaliosaurus, and Loganiosaura). The subgenus Ctenosaura includes the larger species, C. acanthura, C. conspicuosa, C. hemilopha, C. macrolopha, C. nolascensis, C, pectinata, and C. similis, all of which lack the enlarged, heavily keeled to spiky scales on the dorsal surface of the upper thigh (along with some other characters). The males in these species attain total lengths of over 1 meter. The morphological criteria con- tained in the initial descriptions of three of these larger species, C. acanthura, C. pectinata, and C. similis, were apparently quite variable and resulted in no definitive morphological characters by which these three taxa could be distinguished from one another. As recently as ten years ago, some authorities suggested that further study of 80 IGUANA Volume 10, Number 3 the status of the C. similis-acanthura-pectinata group would reveal that only a single species occurred from southern Sinaloa (Mexico) all the way to Panama. This assumption proved to be incorrect. Morphological and genetic studies have shown that these three species are all valid and can be distinguished by scalation and coloration. Field studies also have provided a more detailed picture of the geographic distribution of the three species in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, where their ranges approach each other. The subgenus Loganiosaura includes the medium-sized species, C. bakeri, C. melanosterna, C. oedirhina, and C. palearis, which attain maxi- mum total lengths of 80 cm. Of these species, C. bakeri, C. melanosterna, and C. palearis possess a well-developed pendulous dewlap, whereas C. oedirhina has a transverse gular fold. The species in this subgenus also differ from other ctenosaurs in several skull characters, which rein- forces the view that this group is monophyletic. The subgenus Enyaliosaurus includes the small species, C. alfredschmidti, C. clarki, C. defensor, C. flavidorsalis, C. oaxacana, and C. quinquecari- nata. These species are characterized, among other things, by a reduction of the number of postmen- tal scales (from four to two) and possession of a relatively short, very spiky tail, which, at its widest point, is broader than it is high. Within this sub- genus, C. alfredschmidti, C. clarki, and C. defensor are notable for the reduction of the parietal eye, which is barely distinguishable with the naked eye (this trait is very evident in other species as the dis- tinct spot in the middle of the parietal scale on the top of the head). These three species also have whorls of well-developed, enlarged, spiky scales all the way to the tips of their tails (approximately the distal third of the tail is without whorls in the other species). References Bailey, J.W. 1928. A revision of the lizards of the genus Ctenosaura. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 73:1–55. Böhme, W. 1990. Buchbesprechung. Zschr. Zool. Syst. Evol. Forsch. 28:315–316. Buckley L.J. and R.W. Axtell. 1990. Ctenosaura palearis Stejneger. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. (491):1–3. Buckley L.J. and R.W. Axtell. 1997. Evidence for the specific status of the Honduran lizards formerly referred to Ctenosaura palearis. (Reptilia: Squamata: Iguanidae). Copeia 1997:138–150. de Queiroz, K. 1987. Phylogenetic systematics of iguanine lizards: a comparative osteological study. Univ. California. Publ. Zool. 118:xii + 203 p. de Queiroz, K. 1987. A new Spiny-tailed Iguana from Honduras, with comments on relationships within Ctenosaura (Squamata: Iguania). Copeia 1987:892–902. de Queiroz, K. 1990. Ctenosaura bakeri Stejneger. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. (465):1–2. de Queiroz, K. 1990. Ctenosaura oedirhina de Queiroz. Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. (466):1–2. Etheridge, R.E. 1982. Checklist of the iguanine and Malagasy iguanid lizards, pp. 7–37. In: G.M. Burghardt and A.S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of the World. Their Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Noyes Publ., Park Ridge, New Jersey. Etheridge, R.E. and K. de Queiroz. 1988. A phylogeny of Iguanidae, pp. 283–368. In: R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families: Essays Commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. Frost, D.R. and R. Etheridge. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 81:1–65. Frost, D.R., R. Etheridge, D. Janies, and T.A. Titus. 2001. Total evidence, sequence alignment, evolution of polychrotid lizards, and a reclassification of the Iguania (Squamata: Iguania). Amer. Mus. Novit. (3343):1–38. Gicca, D.F. 1982. Enyaliosaurus clarki (Bailey). Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. (301):1–2. Gicca, D.F. 1983. Enyaliosaurus quinquecarinata (Gray). Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. (329):1–2. Grismer, L.L. 1999. An evolutionary classification of reptiles on islands in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Herpetologica 55:446–469. Köhler, G. 1993. Schwarze Leguane—Freilandbeobachtungen, Pflege und Zucht.. Herpeton Verlag, Offenbach. Köhler, G. 1995. Eine neue Art der Gattung Ctenosaura (Sauria: Iguanidae) aus dem südlichen Campeche, Mexiko. Salamandra 31:1–14. Köhler, G. 1996. Freilanduntersuchungen zur Morphologie, Verbreitung und Lebensweise des Yucatan-Schwarzleguans (Ctenosaura defensor). Salamandra 32:153–162. Köhler, G. and C.R. Hasbun. 2001. A new species of Spiny-tailed Iguana from Mexico formerly referred to Ctenosaura quinquecarinata (Gray 1842)(Reptilia: Squamata: Iguanidae). Senckenb. Biol. 81:257–267. Köhler, G. and K. Klemmer. 1994. Eine neue Schwarzleguanart der Gattung Ctenosaura aus La Paz, Honduras. Salamandra 30:197–208. Köhler, G., W. Schroth, and B. Streit. 2000. Systematics of the Ctenosaura group of lizards (Reptilia: Sauria: Iguanidae). Amphib.-Rept.. 21:177–191. Köhler, G. and B. Streit. 1996. Notes on the systematic status of the taxa, acanthura, pectinata, and similis of the genus Ctenosaura. Senckenb. Biol. 75:33–43. Lazell, J.D. 1992. The family Iguanidae: disagreement with Frost and Etheridge (1989). Herpetol. Rev. 23:109–112. Macy, J.R., A. Larsen, N.B. Ananjeva, and T.J. Papenfuss. 1997. Evolutionary shifts in three major structural features of the mitochondrial genome among Iguanian lizards. J. Mol. Evol. 44:660–674. Schulte, J.A., II, J.R. Macy, A. Larsen, and T. Papenfuss. 1998. Molecular tests of phylogenetic taxonomies: a general procedure and example using four subfamilies of the lizard family Iguanidae. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 10:367–376. 81IGUANASeptember 2003