Iguana b&w text 50 IGUANA • VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1 • MARCH 2008 tinue for a while, with pauses in between, during which the opponents display frontally. The struggle ends when one of the rivals is pushed from the rock or when he gives up by assuming a submissive posture (lying flat on his belly). The winner then stops fighting and waits in threat display for the rival to leave. The fight is a highly ritualized tournament in the course of which the stronger wins, without hurting the loser. Only if one introduces a male artificially into the territory of another male, can damaging fights be observed. Then the ter- ritory owner rushes at the introduced individual, which does not show the introductory ceremonies that normally release ritual- ized fighting. The introduced individual is bitten as a conse- quence. Females fight in some places of the archipelago for the rare egg-laying sites. In contrast to the males, their fighting is far less ritualized. It begins with threat display and head-pushing, but soon they bite and shake each other viciously. They have less developed hornlike scales than the males. Ritualized fighting is fairly widespread in animals that are capable of inflicting serious damage to conspecifics. Poisonous snakes never bite each other, but the rivals wrestle according to the fixed rules. Cichlid fishes have developed various forms of mouthfighting, and thus avoid mutual damage. In a number of species (e.g., in wolves), fighting starts as a damaging fight, but ends by a submissive posture of the loser, which inhibits further aggression (Lorenz 1963). The existence of ritualized combats shows clearly that the killing of a conspecific is generally avoided in vertebrates. Only animals without weapons or animals that can easily retreat after the exchange of bites have no such social inhibitions. This is, for example, true for the hamster (Cricetus cricetus), where the loser has no difficulty in running away. The winner never follows far. In captivity, species of this type often kill each other. From the fact that ritualized fighting occurs, we can learn furthermore that strong selection favors aggression. Otherwise aggression would have been counterselected in species that can do damage to conspecifics. However, they developed the most complicated fighting techniques instead, in order to permit fighting, as a mechanism for spacing-out (Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1951, 1961). References Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1955. Der Kommentkampf der Meerechse (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). Zeitschrift der Tierpsychologie 12: 49–62. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1961 The fighting behavior of animals. Scientific American 205(6): 112–122. Lorenz, K. 1963. Das sogenannte Böse, zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. Borotha-Schoeler Verlag, Wien. In July, 1913, I was hunting in the Cove’s River Ranges with two companions-Andrew and John Duncan, of Megalong. We found a black-and-yellow banded monitor lizard about five feet long concealed in a crevice on the face of a wall. We had no intention of injuring him, but out of mischief Andrew Duncan suggested that we should make him yell. I was sceptical, but both men assured me that the lizard could, and would yell under persuasion. On condition that there should be no cruelty, I con- sented to a demonstration. They laughed at the idea of cruelty. Andrew picked up a stick and began poking the reptile in the ribs and tickling him under the arm. It stood it for a while, merely squirming closer down in the crevice, then, having had enough of it, blew himself out and emitted a most comically doleful bellow that could be heard several hundred yards away. This he did repeatedly until we had laughed ourselves tired. It was funny, on looking back after we had gone fifty yards, to see the lizard stick his head around the corner to make sure that we had really departed. I have had for the last four years at my hunting-box on the Naltai River, a tame monitor whom I have called “Joseph” on account of his coat of many colors, and who is the interesting companion of my solitude and incidentally keeps the snakes away. With the above in my mind, I experimented on him. I found him camped under the bench beneath the window, and irritated him with the end of a stick. He did as the other had done — filled himself with wind and then emitted it in a pro- longed bellowing groan. By the way, our “bookbook owl” does much the same thing. He fills himself nearly to bursting in a suc- cession of gasps, and then says “Hoo-hoohoo” till he has no more breath, then fills up again. EIBL-EIBESFELDT 1 Originally published in Science 52: 273 (1920). The Booming Lizard of Australia1 Walter H. Bone Linnzan Society of New South Wales, Sydney “Black-and-yellow banded monitors” (= Lace Monitors, Varanus varius) can be loudly vocal when disturbed. PH IL M O R LE Y