International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 2 (2),  December 2018


International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

87 | P a g e 

 

 

International Journal Human Capital Available online at 

Management http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/ijhcm 

E-ISSN 2580-9164  

Vol. 6, No. 1, June 2022, p 87-98  

 

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL FINANCE 

MANAGEMENT IN MUSIRAWAS REGENCY OFFICE INDONESIA 
 

Yohanes Susanto 
Faculty of Economics, Master of Management  

Universitas Bina Insan Lubuklinggau  

Email: susantoyohanes60@gmail.com 

 

Gunadi 
Faculty of Economics, Master of Management  

Universitas Bina Insan Lubuklingau 

Email: gunadi@gmail.com 

 

 

 

ABSTRACT 
 

 This study aimed to find out the relationship and influence of competency, commitment, and work 

motivation on regional finance management in Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas 

Regency Office. This study was carried out on 40 employees in Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office. Data were collected by survey method through distributing questionnaires 

and then processed by SPSS 24 program. This study used ex post facto descriptive analysis. Based on the 

results, the three variables namely competency, commitment and motivation had a significant and positive 

influence on performance in the Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office 

partially and simultaneously. This shows that employees placed in regional financial management are 

required to have competency, knowledge, skills and understanding in the field of financial accounting. 

 

 

Keywords: Competency, Commitment, Motivation, and Performance  

 

Received: 22 Januari 2022 

Accepted: 31 Mei 2022 

Publish: 1 Juni 2022 

 
 

 

How to Cite: 

Susanto, Y (2022). PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL FINANCE MANAGEMENT IN 

MUSIRAWAS REGENCY OFFICE INDONESIA. International Journal of Human Capital 

Management, 6(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJHCM.06.01.8 

 

 

INTRODUCTION 

 
In good regional financial management, regional work units (SKPD) must have competent, 

committed, motivated human resources with an accounting graduate background, often attend briefings on 

regional financial accounting, and have experience in regional financial management. It is necessary to 

http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/


International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

88 | P a g e 

 

 

implement an existing accounting system, these competent resources will be able to understand accounting 

logic well. The failure of regional government human resources in understanding regional financial 

management will have an impact on regional financial statement errors (Warisno, 2011). For this reason, 

to produce good quality financial statements, competent human resources are needed in the financial sector 

(Afriyanti, 2011). Likewise, in preparing regional financial statements, SKPDs are expected to have human 

resources with longer work experience in accounting or finance, because in preparing regional financial 

statements, employees really need to understand accounting and the rules for preparing regional financial 

statements (Indisari, 2008). 2011) The longer the experience an employee has, the higher the understanding 

of duties and responsibilities (Jesus, 2011). Furthermore, (Halim, 2013) stated that regional finance is thet 

al rights and liabilities can be measured by money, either in the form of money or goods as regional wealth. 

This definition is in line with the general provisions of Government Regulation Number 58 of 2005 on 

Regional Financial Management which states thet al regional rights and liabilities in the context of 

implementing regional government can be valued in money, including all forms of regional wealth. 

The Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office is one part of the 

organization owned by the Musirawas Regency Government, to carry out functions in public services to 

produce financial statements in accordance with the provisions. In its implementation, it is found that 

problems related to the quality of human resources as described above can disrupt the performance of the 

organization as a whole. Human resources in question are employees at the Department of Planning and 

Finance in Musirawas Regency Office. These elements such as competency level related to the ability to 

complete a job, commitment related to self-seriousness in doing work, and motivation related to how much 

encouragement a person has to be able to achieve a goal as an employee. In fact, there are several problems 

found in the Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office related to these variables 

being observations on the competency level in the table below. 

 

Table 1 Competency Level 

 

Number of 

Employee  

A S N TKS/Non PNS Financial 

Statement 

Training 

Percentage 

40 28  12 4 10% 

 

Based on the table above, the competency level, especially in the field of financial management, 

only 4 people or 10% complete financial education and training. This can result in errors such as incomplete 

accountability reports (SPJ) in regional financial statements. 

The second problem is related to the commitment carried out by employees in the Department of 

Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office, there are six standard operating procedures (SOPs) 

that have been prepared, socialized, and implemented as Table 2 below. 

 

Table 2 Standard Operating Procedure of Regional Financial Management 

 

SOP of Regional Financial Management Implementation (%) 

Preparation of PPAS proposal documents  80% 

Preparation of RKA/RKPA documents 100% 

Preparation of DPA/DPPA documents 100% 

Preparation of financial reports 85% 

The mechanism for submitting SPMUP/GU/TU/Ls 75% 

Preparation of LKJIP 80% 

 

Based on the table above, the commitment of employees has not fully satisfied or met the standard 

operating procedures set out in regional finance management, the management of activities should be 

carried out in accordance with SOPs. However, violations still occur, in addition to disrupting the 

organizational accountability process, can also potentially violate the law, the SOPs that are most frequently 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

89 | P a g e 

 

 

violated are the SOPs on the mechanism for submitting SPMUP/GU/TU/Ls, although they are not yet 

complete and the SOPs on the preparation of PPAS proposal documents. 

The third problem is related to work motivation in the Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office, the lack of work motivation will have an impact on decreasing performance. 

Some evidence shows that employees often do not go to work for unclear reasons, with the absence of 

several employees requiring a replacement employee to complete the abandoned work so that it has an 

impact on organizational performance, in addition, there is a lack of interest in employees to attend 

education and training related to regional finance management. 

 

 

 

LITERATURE REVIEW 

 

Competence 

According to Edison et al (2016), competency is the ability to carry out a job correctly and has 

advantages based on matters concerning knowledge, expertise and attitudes, while according to Robins 

(2015) stated that work competence refers to knowledge, skills, and personality directly affect performance. 

According to Sedarmayanti (2017), the basic concept of competence starts from the concept of individuals 

so that they can work with extraordinary participation. Furthermore, Vitalina (2016) stated that someone who 

has a high competency automatically produces good performance or output. 

According to Moeheriono (2012), competency is a basic characteristic of a person related to 

individual performance in work or basic characteristics that have a causal relationship with criteria used as 

an effective reference or excellent performance in certain situations. Furthermore, Winanti (2011) showed a 

positive influence between competency on performance. This is in line with Rosanti et al (2014) and Ataunur 

et al (2015) that competency and training partially or simultaneously affect performance. 

Nilam (2013) stated that competency also affects work motivation. Furthermore, according to 

Priansa (2014), competency is the capacity of an employee to lead to behavior in accordance with the 

demands of the job and in accordance with the accuracy of the organization leading to success. According to 

Sutrisno (2015), competency is mastery of a task, skills, attitudes and appreciation to support success. 

From some of the opinions or definitions of experts above, the researcher synthesizes that the 

competency possessed by individual employees must be able to support the vision and mission of the 

organization or company. 

 

Commitment 

                

             According to Sapitri (2016), the problem affecting performance is organizational commitment. 

Furthermore, Joni (2015) stated that many employees have a low commitment to the goals set by the 

organization and lack compliance with leadership policies so that work performance decreases. This is 

because in general, they do not want to work too long in the company. Furthermore, Alen Mayer (2013) 

divided organizational commitment into three, namely; affective commitment, continuance commitment, 

and normative commitment. 

According to Respatiningsih et al (2015), the decline in organizational performance is due to a lack of 

employee commitment. Furthermore, Nurhargati et al (2014) stated that affective commitment, continuance 

commitment, and normative commitment simultaneously affect organizational performance. Srimulyani 

(2017) stated that affective commitment has a positive effect on performance, but continuance and 

normative commitment have a negative effect on organizational performance. Meanwhile, Kasman (2014) 

stated that commitment reflects the attitude of employee loyalty to the organization 

Based on previous studies, researchers can synthesize the definition of commitment as a promise or identity 

possessed by employees in devoting themselves to organizations with high loyalty. 

 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

90 | P a g e 

 

 

Work Motivation 

 

   According to Siagian, (2015) work motivation is a driving force to behave with certain goals. 

Furthermore, Wibowo (2016) stated motivation is a psychological process generating and driving behavior 

to achieve goals. 

According to Hasan et al (2019), an employee will be willing to make greater efforts if it is believed that 

better performance will result in greater rewards. Furthermore, Widarni (2020) stated that motivation is the 

tendency to respond so that people are interested in working. 

According to Handoko (2014), motivation is a state in which the person to carry out certain activities in 

order to achieve goals. Furthermore, Gitosudarmo (2014) stated that motivation is an internal factor to drive 

behavior to fulfill certain goals or individual satisfaction. Mangkunegara (2015) stated that motivation is a 

condition to achieve the motive goal. Furthermore, Winardi (2015) defined motivation as a potential power 

within a person to be developed or by external forces where rewards can affect performance positively or 

negatively depending on the situation and conditions faced by the person concerned. Furthermore, Pamela 

(2015) defined motivation as providing appropriate guidance or direction, resources and rewards so that 

employees are inspired and interested in working the way they want. 

Based on previous studies, researchers can synthesize that work motivation is the driving force or 

willingness from within the employee concerned or the driving force from outside as a form of activity to 

be able to meet the needs of the employee. 

 

Performance  

 

              According to Simanjuntak (2016), performance is the achievement of carrying out certain tasks in 

realizing organizational goals, objectives, mission, and vision. Furthermore, Rivai (2015) stated that 

performance is the overall level of success during a certain period in carrying out tasks compared to certain 

standards such as targets, goals, or criteria determined in advance and agreed upon. Meanwhile, Hasibuan 

(2015) stated that performance is work achieved by someone in carrying out a task that is charged on the 

basis of skill, experience, sincerity, and on time. 

 

 

Hyopothesis 1 (H1) 

Ho : Competency, Commitment, and Work Motivation simultaneously have no influence on performance 

of Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Competency. Commitment, and Work Motivation simultaneously have an influence on performance 

of Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office. 

Hypothesis 2 (H2): 

Ho : Competency partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 
Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Competency partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 
Musirawas Regency Office 

Hypothesis 3 (H3): 

Ho : Commitment partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Commitment partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Hypothesis 4 (H4): 

Ho :   Motivation partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha :  Motivation partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

 

 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

91 | P a g e 

 

 

METHODOLOGY 

 

The method used in this study was an ex post facto quantitative descriptive approach. This study 

used the path analysis technique. The data used were primary data obtained through questionnaires and 

interviews. Sampling was carried out using a non-probability sampling technique. The sampling technique 

did not provide an opportunity for each member of the population to be selected as a sample so that the 

sample in this study amounted to 40 employees at the Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas 

Regency Office. Sugiono (2015) stated that the population is an area of subjects and objects having certain 

qualities and characteristics set by researchers to be studied and conclusions to be drawn. Because the 

population is less than 100, then the entire population is sampled. 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

 

The validity test is used to measure the validity of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is said to 

be valid if the questions on the questionnaire are able to reveal something measured by the questionnaire. 

The criteria for testing the validity are if r-calculated > r-table (0.312) then the instrument/item statement 

is declared valid, on the other hand, if r-calculated < r-table, the invalid statement/item must be removed 

or replaced. The results of the validity test can be seen in Table 3. 

  Tab le 4 Validity Test on Competency, Commitment, Work Motivation, and Performance 

 
Variable Statement Valid Item Invalid 

Competency 15 15 0 
Commitment 15 15 0 

Work Motivation 15 
8 

15 
8 

0 

Source: Data processed by researchers (2020) 

 

Reliability  

 

 The reliability test is used to test the consistency or stability of the study instrument on the 

respondents and is given at different times. If Cronbach's Alpha value > 0.6, the instrument is declared 

reliable. On the other hand, if Cronbach's Alpha value is < 0.6, the instrument is declared unreliable. 

Reliability test results can be seen in Table 5. 
Table 5. Reliability Test Results 

 

 Variable Cronbach’s Alpha Description  

 Competency .967 Reliable  

 Commitment .979 Reliable  

 Work Motivation 

 

.957 

972 

Reliable 

Reliable 

 

     

 

Source: Data processed by researchers (2020) 

 

Descriptive Analysis Results 

 

    The descriptive analysis provides an overview of the data distributed to 40 employees of the 

Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office. Based on the questionnaire distributed 

to the respondents, the competency variable had a score of 52.40% for the answer "Agree (S)" of and 

"Strongly Agree (SS)" of 50.10% or was in the medium category (50% - 70%) The highest score 

contribution came from the indicator “employees understand the regional government financial recording 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

92 | P a g e 

 

 

system”, this proves that employees have low knowledge of regional finance administration systems. In 

the commitment variable, the answer "agree" had a score of 51.20% and "strongly agree" of 34.10% or 

was in the medium category (50% - 70%) The highest score contribution came from the indicator 

"commitment is a responsibility must be performance employee”, this proves that the commitment to work 

is because they are able to understand their main duties and functions. The work motivation variable had 

a score of 52% for "strongly agree" with being in the medium category (50% - 70%). The highest score 

contribution came from the indicator "supervisors always try to provide work motivation to their 

subordinates", this proves that the motivation given by superiors to subordinates has gone well, and the 

performance variable had a score for "agree" of 53.10% and "strongly agree" of 55.25% or in the medium 

category (50%-70%). The highest score contribution came from the indicator "the work of the 

organizational unit in accordance with the target set", this proves that the organization has carried out the 

task in accordance with the work target of Musirawas Regency Government. 

 
Classical Assumption Test 

Normality Test 

 

   A normality test is used to determine whether the data is normally distributed or not. This normality test 

uses one sample Kolmogorov Smirnov with 0.05 significance level. If the significance level < 0.05, the 

data were normally distributed, according to the following table. 

 

Table 6. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Results 

 

 Competency 

(X1) 

Commitmen

t (X2) 

Motivation 

(Z) 

Kinerja 

(Y) 

N  40 40 40 40 

Normal 

Parametea,b                      

Mean 4.5928 4.5383 4.4780 4.5475 

Std.Deviation .59603 .73886 .66406 .75535 

Most Extreme 

Differences 

Absolute .247 .313 .248 .320 

Positive .247 .266 .216 .275 

 Negative -.216 -.313 -.248 -.320 

Test Statistic  .247 .313 .248 .320 

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000c .000c .000c .000c 

 

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

 

Table 6 shows the Asymp-Sig (2-tailed) or significance of 0.000 so that the data were normally 

distributed and met the requirements for multiple linear regression analysis. 

 

Linearity Test 

Linearity test aims to determine whether the two variables to be analyzed correlational statistics show a 

linear relationship or not. The linearity test was carried out using SPSS at 0.05 significance level. 

 

Table 7. Linearity Test between Commitment on Performance 

 

 Sum of 

Squares 

 

df 
Mean 

Square 

 

F 

 

Sig. 

Performance 

(Y) * 

Competency 

(X1) 

Between 

Groups 

(Combined) 16.627 16 1.039 4.250 .001 

Linearity 10.351 1 10.351 42.327 .000 

 Deviation 

fromLineariy 

 

6.277 

 

15 

 

.418 

 

1.711 

 

.120 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

93 | P a g e 

 

 

Within Groups 5.624 23 .245   

Total 22.252 39    

 

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

 

Based on the linearity test between the competence and performance variables in Table 7, the 

significance was 0.000 or lower than 0.05, so it can be concluded that there was a linear relationship 

between the two variables. 

 
Table 9. Linearity Test between Commitment and Performance  

 

ANOVA Table 

 Sum of 

Squares 

 

df 
Mean 

Square 

 

F 

 

Sig. 

Performance 

(Y) * 

Commitment 

(X2) 

Between 

Groups 

(Combined) 6.252 11 .568 .995 .275 

Linearity .203 1 .203 .355 .000 

 Deviation 

from 

Linearity 

 

6.049 

 

10 

 

.605 

 

1.059 

 

.224 

Within Groups 16.000 28 .571   

Total 22.252 39    

 

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

 

Based on the linearity test between the commitment and performance variables in Table 8, the 

significance was 0.000 or lower than 0.05, so it can be concluded that there was a linear relationship between 

the two variables. 

 
Table 9. Test between Motivation and Performance  

 

 Sum of 

Squares 

 

df 
Mean 

Square 

 

F 

 

Sig. 

Kinerja (Y) * 

Motivation (Z) 

Between 

Groups 

(Combined) 17.763 18 .987 4.617 .001 

Linearity 4.305 1 4.305 20.141 .000 

 Deviation 

from 

Linearity 

 

13.459 

 

17 

 

.792 

 

3.704 

 

.003 

Within Groups 4.488 21 .214   

Total 22.252 39    

 

    Based on the linearity test between the motivation and performance variables in Table 9, the 

significance was 0.000 or lower than 0.05, so it can be concluded that there was a linear relationship 

between the two variables 

 

 

 

 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

94 | P a g e 

 

 

Multicollinearity Test Result 

 

The multicollinearity can be seen from the VIF (Variance Inflation Factor) and the correlation 

coefficient between independent variables. If VIF < 5 or close 1, then multicollinearity does not occur. The 

multicollinearity test results can be seen in Table 10. 

 

Table 10. Multicollinearity Test Results 

 
Coefficientsa 

 

 

Model 

Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

 

 

t 

 

 

Sig. 

Collinearity 

Statistics 

 

B 

Std. 

Error 

 

Beta 

 

Tolerance 

 

VIF 

1 (Constant) 18,450 1,993  9,258 ,000   

Competence ,092 ,032 ,215 2,905 ,004 ,787 1,273 

Commit

ment 

,088 ,026 ,255 3,443 ,001 ,787 1,273 

 Motivati

on 

,088 ,023 ,245 2,440 ,002 ,771 1,273 

a. Dependent Variable: Performance 

 

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

 

Based on Table 10 , VIF of competence variable was 1.273, VIF of commitment variable was 1.273, 

VIF of motivation variable was 1.273 showing VIF <5. It can be concluded that there was no multicollinearity 

problem therefore the regression model can be accepted. 

 

Multiple Linear Regression Test Results 

 

Hypothesis 1 (H1) 

Ho : Competency, Commitment, and Work Motivation simultaneously have no influence on performance 

of Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Competency. Commitment, and Work Motivation simultaneously have an 
influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office. 
 

                  Table 11 F test (simultaneous) bwteen competency, commitment, and motivation on performance 

 

ANOVAa 

 

Model 
Sum of 

Squares 

 

df 

 

Mean Square 

 

F 

 

Sig. 

1 Regression 149,334 3 74,667 17,142 ,000b 

Residual 767,821 197 3,898   

Total 917,155 199    

a. Dependent Variable: Performance 

b. Predictors: (Constant),Competence, Commiment and Motivation 

 

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

    Based on Table 11, competency, commitment, and work motivation had a positive and significant 

influence because of F-calculated of 17.142 > F-table of 4.091. This illustrates the positive and significant 

influence between competency, commitment, and work motivation on performance in the Department of 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

95 | P a g e 

 

 

Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office.  

 

Hypothesis 2 (H2) 

Ho : Competency partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Competency partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

 

                   Table 12 T-test of Competency and Performance  

 

 

Model 
Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

 

 

t 

 

 

Sig. B Std. Error Beta 

1 (Constant) .578 .696  
.682 

.830 .412 

 Competency (X1) .864 .150 5.749 .000 

          Source: Calcuation of SPSS 24(2020) 

 

  Table 12 shows the t-calculated for the competency variable was 5.749 and a significance value of 
0.000. This shows that t-calculated > t-table or 5.749 > 1.684 and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05 
meaning H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted showing a positive and significant influence between 
competency on performance. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies such as that conducted 
by Ade Muslimat (2020) that competency had a positive and significant influence on the performance of 
0.865 or 85%. This illustrates that there was a strong influence between competency on performance. 

Furthermore, Anisa Putri Sutrisno et al (2018) stated that competence had a positive and significant influence 
on performance with a strong value of 51%. Furthermore, Indarti and Kurniawan (2020) prove that 
competency has an effect on performance, this is also supported by Krisbowo et al (2017) that competence 
has an effect on performance, thus it is evident that competency owned by employees had a significant 
influence on performance. 

 

Hypothesis 3 (H3): 

Ho : Commitment partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha : Commitment partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

 

Table 13 T-test of Commitment and Performance 

 

 

 

 

Model 

Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

 

 

t 

 

 

Sig. B Std. Error Beta 

1 (Constant) 4.105 .759  

 

.095 

5.409 .000 

 Commitment (X2) 
.098 .165 .591 .558 

 

 Table 13 shows the t-calculated for the commitment variable was 5.409  and a significance value 

of 0.000. This shows that t-calculated > t-table or 5.409 > 1.684 and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05 

meaning H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted showing a positive and significant influence between 

commitment on performance. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies such as that 

conducted by Riris (2020) that commitment had a positive and significant influence on the performance 

of  0.445  atau 45 %. Mahmud et al, (2010) stated that commitment can develop if the employee is able 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

96 | P a g e 

 

 

to meet expectations and needs, thus it is evident that commitment owned by employees had a significant 

influence on performance. 

 

Hypothesis 4 (H4): 

Ho :   Motivation partially has no influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

Ha :  Motivation partially has an influence on performance of Department of Planning and Finance in 

Musirawas Regency Office 

 

Tabel 14 T-test of Motivation and Performance 

 

 

 

 

Model 

Unstandardized 

Coefficients 

Standardized 

Coefficients 

 

 

t 

 

 

Sig. B Std. Error Beta 

1 (Constant) 2.307 .750  

 

.440 

3.076 .004 

 Motivation(Z) 
.500 .166 3.019 .005 

 

 

                            Table 14 shows the t-calculated for the motivation variable was 3.076 and a significance value of 
0.000. This shows that t-calculated > t-table or 3.076 > 1.64 and a significance value of 0.004 <0.05 meaning 
H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted showing a positive and significant influence between motivation on 
performance. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies such as that conducted by Rida Nadia 
Noer, et al (2020) that motivation had 0.621 or 62 % influence on performance. Furthermore,  Yoeyong 
Rahsel (2016) showed the influence of motivation on performance was 0.469 atau 46 %. Thus, work 
motivationowned by employees had a significant influence on performance.  

 

Coefficient of Determination (Adjusted R2) Analyis 

 

Table 15. Coefficient of Determination (Adjusted R2) Analysis 

Model Summary 

 

Model 

 

R 

 

R Square 

Adjusted R 

Square 

Std. Error of the Estimate 

1 ,864a ,746 ,754 1,877 

a. Predictors: (Constant), Competence, Commiment and Motivation  

Source: Calculation of SPSS 24 (2020) 

Based on Table 14, the R2 (R Square) was 0.746 or (74.5%). This shows strong influence between 

competence  variable, commitment vatiable, and motivation variable  on performance  at Department of 

Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office. Meanwhile, the remaining 25.5 % can be explained or 

influenced by other variables not studied. 

CONCLUSION 

 

Competency, Commitment, and Work Motivation simultaneously had a significant and positive 

influence on performance where F-test was 17,142 > 4,091 and significance value was 0.000 < 0.05 at the 

Department of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office. 

Partially, each competency, commitment, and work motivation variable had a positive and 

significant influence on performance, but the competency variable had the most dominant influence on the 

performance of 0.864 or 86%. This shows that the competency possessed by employees in the Department 



International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

97 | P a g e 

 

 

of Planning and Finance in Musirawas Regency Office was still low in terms of knowledge, skills, and 

experience. It is recommended that in the placement of employees to manage regional finances, they must 

master competency in order to fulfill optimal performance in the organization. 

  

 

 

REFERENCES 

 

Ade Muslimat. (2020) Pengaruh Kompetensi terhadap kinerja karyawanpada PT. Gramedia Jakarta, Junrla 

Ekonomi Effektif, Vol 2 Nomor 4 hal 586-592. 

http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/JEE/article/view/10691/6688 

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2015. Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan kedua 

belas. Remaja Rosdakarya:Bandung 

Ataunur, I., & Ariyanto, E. (2015). PengaruhKompetensi dan Pelatihan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT 

Adaro Energy Tbk. TelaahBisnis Volume 2 Nomor 6 , 135-150. 

Anisa Putri Sutriso, Alini Gilang. (2018) Pengaruh Kompetensi terhadap kinerja karywan (Studi pada PT. 

Telekomunikasi Indonesia  Witel Bandung) Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen Vol 8 nomor 

1 hal 62 - 76  File:///C:/Users/Asus/AppData/Local/Temp/998-Article Text-1858-2-10-

20190625.pdf 

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta 

Allen and Meyer. 2013. The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Contintinuance and 

NormativeCommitment to Organitazion. PT Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta. 

Rida Nadia Noer, Ike Rahmawati, Yana Fajar Basori, (2020) Pengaruh Motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja 

pegawai Biling manajemen di PT. Haliyora Power ULP Sukabumi Kota, jurnal Dinamika, 

Ilmu Adminstrasi Negara Vol 7 Nomor 2 

https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/dinamika/article/view/3653 

Edison,2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung : Alfabeta 

Eny Lestary Widarni dan Cahya Budhi Irawan, 2020, Analisis Motivasi Pelayanan Publik danRole Stress 

Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai VariabelIntervening Pada 

PT Kereta Api Indonesia DAOP VIII, Dinamika Governance: JurnalIlmu Administrasi 

Negara Volume 10 (2), 

Respatiningsih, Ida & Frans Sudirjo. 2015. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Motivasi, Kapabilitas dan 

Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Empirik Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten 

Pemalang). Jurnal Ilmiah UNTAGSemarang Vo. 4, No. 3 

Gitosudarmo, Indriyo. 2015. Manajemen Operasi. Yogyakarta. BPFEYogyakarta. 

Hani, T. Handoko. 2015. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE-Yogyakarta. 

Hasibuan, Malayu. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara 

Hasan dan Wibawani, Sri, 2019, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja TenagaKependidikan 

dengan Motivasi Kerja sebagai Variabel Moderating, Public Administration Journal,1(3), 260-

269. 

Indarti, D. A. R., & Kurniawan, G. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Supervisi Dan KomitmenOrganisasi 

Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Penanaman Modal Dan PelayananTerpadu Kabupaten 

Pasuruan. Sasanti Journal Of Economic And Business, 1(1). 

Joni, Komang Udayana. 2015. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan PT. Nusa 

Baruna Cabang Singaraja Tahun 2015. Vol 5 Nomor 1 Tahun 2015. 

Kriswibowo, A., Harsanto, B. T., & Kurniasih, D. 2017. Upaya Meningkatkan KinerjaPegawai Kantor 

Perpustakaan Dan Arsip Daerah Kabupaten Banyumas. DinamikaGovernance: Jurnal Ilmu 

Administrasi Negara, 7(2). 

Kaswan. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Keunggulan Bersaing Organisasi. Graha Ilmu, 

Yogyakarta 

Moeheriono. (2012). Pengukuran Kinerja BerbasisKompetensi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada 

Nilam, Susi, dan Maesaroh. 2013. Hubungan Kompetensi dan Motivasi Dengan Kinerja Dinas Sosial 

Wonosobo.Diakses 12 Februari 2019 

http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/JEE/article/view/10691/6688
https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/dinamika/article/view/3653


International Journal of Human Capital Management, Vol. 6 (1), June 2022 

98 | P a g e 

 

 

Nurbiyati, Titik dan Kunto Wibisono. 2014. Analisis Pengaruh Komitmen Afektif, Kontinyu dan Normatif 

Terhadap Kinerja dengan Disiplin Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Kajian Bisnis 

Vol. 22, No. 1: 21 – 37. 

Rosanti, D. I., & Budiyanto. (2014). PengaruhPendidikan, Kompetensi, Kompensasiterhadap Kinerja 

Karyawan PT Lat i Prayogi.Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Manajemen Vol. 3 No. 11, 1-16 

Robbins, S.P dan Judge T.A. 2015. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat 

Sapitri, Ranty. 2016. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Perusahaan Listrik 

Negara Area Pekanbaru. JOM Fisip Vol.3 No.2 Oktober 2016. 

 

Sedarmayanti. 2017. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju. 

Sondang P. Siagian. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. 

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D.Bandung: 

Alfabeta. 

Sutrisno, Edy, 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta :Murai Kencana. 

Simanjuntak, Desrina 2016. Pelaksanaan penilaian prestasi kerja pada Hotel The Jayakarta Daira 

Palembang,  Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya. 

Srimulyani, Rochiyati, Bayu. 2017. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasional terhadap Kinerja Karyawan 

dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) sebagai Variabel Moderating. The 6th 

University Research Colloquium 2017 Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang 

Priansa, Juni Doni. 2014.Perencanaan & Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta. 

Veithzal Rivai. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Edisi ke 6, PT.Raja Grafindo 

Persada, Depok, 16956. 

Vitalia dan Widyawati, 2016. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Profitabilitas TerhadapNilai Perusahaan 

Properti di Bursa Efek Indonesia.Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi :Volume 5, Nomor 1. 

Wibowo, 2016. Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi Kelima, PT.Rajagrafindo Persada Jakarta-14240 

Winardi. 2015. Manajemen Prilaku Organisasi, Edisi Revisi, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta. 

Winanti, M. B. (2011). Pengaruh Kompetensi terhadap Kinerja Karyaw an (Survei pada PT. Frisian Flag 

Indonesia Wiayah Jawa Barat). Majalah Ilmiah UNIKOM Vol. 7 No. 2 , 249-267