IJLRES - International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies 
ISSN: 2580-6777 (p); 2580-6785 (e) 
DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
Vol. 2, No. 1, 2018  
Page: 73 - 85 

73 

 

 
 

THE INTEGRATED LEARNING MODEL TYPE OF “CONNECTED”  
IN INCREASING THE STUDENTS’ LEARNING CREATIVITY AND ABILITY  

 
Diani Syahputri 

Faculty of Education, University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara 
dianisyahputri@gmail.com 

 
 

Elfrianto  
Faculty of Education, University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara 

elfrianto@gmail.com 
 
 

Abstract. This study aims to: 1) Analyze the application of integrated learning model of type 
connected in reminding creativity and students' learning ability; 2) Analyze student response 
after application of connected learning model; 3) Evaluate students' creativity and learning 
ability after applied learning model. This research was conducted at University of 
Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. The study was conducted in two years. The first year starts 
from November 2016 to July 2017 and continues the second year beginning in September 2017 
until May 2018. Data are collected from observations and questionnaires. Data analysis is done 
by finding mean, mastery, ability and creativity of students. The results showed that integrated 
learning method type connected can increase creativity, generate positive responses to learning 
and improve student learning ability. 
 
Keywords:  Integrated Learning Model, Connected Type, Learning Creativity and 

Ability 
 

 
 
INTRODUCTION 

  The learning process that is interesting and appropriately designed will 

provide an effective and meaningful learning experience so as to enable 

students to be active during teaching and learning activities (meaningful 

learning), and otherwise students will be passive if the course is very saturated. 

  The importance of learning outcomes is a measure in assessing student 

competence as a reference for improving learning strategies. Learning outcomes 

are used as one of the conditions for determining graduation and minimum 

requirements in applying for a job. Suppose in determining the minimum GPA 

within the company. Someone will succeed in learning if there is desire and 

mailto:dianisyahputri@gmail.com
mailto:elfrianto@gmail.com


Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

74 

ability to learn. To arouse students' desire and learning ability, lecturers must 

be able to motivate students, improve teaching patterns. 

 Integrated learning is believed to be a learning approach that fits the needs. 

Integrated learning is based on the inquiry approach, which involves students from 

planning, exploring, and brain storming. With integrated learning students are 

encouraged to work in groups and learn from the results of their own experiences. One 

of the simplest integrated learning models is the connected model. The model focuses 

on making clear connections with each course, connecting one topic to the next, 

connecting one skill to another, and one semester with the next. The linkages that occur 

can be held spontaneously or planned first. Based on the above background, the 

specific objectives of this research are: 1) Analyzing the application of integrated 

learning model of connected type in reminding creativity and students' learning 

ability; 2) Analyze student response after applied learning model connected 

(connected); 3) Evaluating students' creativity and learning ability after applied 

learning model connected (connected).  

 
LITERATURE REVIEW 
Connected Model  

Learning model is a plan or a pattern used as a guide in planning the learning 

in the classroom or tutorial learning. Learning model refers to the learning used, 

including learning objectives, learning environment, and classroom management 1. 

Integrated learning is learning that begins with a particular subject or theme that is 

linked to other subjects, certain concepts linked to other concepts, implemented 

spontaneously or planned, either in one or more study areas, or with diverse learning 

experiences of children so that learning is more meaningful. 

The characteristics of integrated learning are as follows, according to Ministry 

of Education and Culture (MoEC): 

a. Holistics  

b. Meaningfull  

c. Authentics 

d. Active 

                                                 
1 Trianto. (2007). Model Pembelajaran dalam Teori dan Praktek.  Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka 

Publisher. 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

75

The integrated learning steps follow the steps taken in each learning model 

which includes three stages, they are: 

a. Planning stage 

Determine the type of combined subjects and skills. 

1. Selecting material reviews, competency standards, basic 

competencies, and indicators. 

2. Define the combined sub skills. In general, skills that must be 

mastered include the skills of thinking, social skills, and 

organizing skills. 

3. Formulate indicators of learning outcomes 

4. Determine the learning steps 

b. Actuating stage 

The main principles in the implementation of integrated learning include: 

1. Teachers should not be the single actor who dominates in 

the learning activities 

2. Giving individual and group responsibilities must be 

clear in every task that demands group collaboration 

3. Teachers need to accommodate ideas that are sometimes 

unthinkable during the planning process 

c. Evaluation stage 

Evaluation phase in the form of evaluation of learning and learning outcomes. 

The principle of integrated learning evaluation, they are: 

1. Provide opportunities for learners to conduct self-evaluation in 

addition to other forms of evaluation 

2. Invite learners to evaluate learning outcomes based on success 

criteria of achieving the goals to be achieved.  

 
Creativity 

Creativity is a person's ability to create that is characterized by an imaginative 

expression of originality 2. In Big Indonesian Dictionary creativity is the ability to create, 

                                                 
2 Anik, Pamilu. (2007). Mengembangkan Kreativitas Dan Kecerdasan Anak. Jakarta: Buku 

kita. p.29 



Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

76 

about creative and creative. Creativity can also be meaningful as the newest and original 

creations are created, because the creativity of a unique mental process to produce 

something new, different and original.  

Some of the above description can be argued that creativity at its core is a person's 

ability to give birth to something new, both in the form of ideas and real work, both in 

the form of new works and a combination of things that already exist, all of which are 

relatively different from what already exists previous.  

According to Slameto said that the characteristics of creativity can be grouped 

into two categories, cognitive and non-cognitive. Cognitive features include  

o Orisinality 

o Flexibility 

o Fluently, and  

o Elaboration3.  

While the non-cognitive characteristics such as attitude motivation and creative 

creative personality. These two traits are just as important, the intelligence that is not 

supported by the creative personality will not produce anything. Creativity can only be 

born from intelligent people who have a healthy psychological condition. Creativity is 

not just the actions of the brain but emotional and mental health variables are very 

influential on the birth of a creative work. Intelligence without a healthy mental can be 

very difficult to produce creative work.  

According to Nurhayati Potential Diagnostic Guidelines, the characteristics of 

creativity are mentioned: 

a. It shows great curiosity 

b. Create a variety of ideas and ideas to solve problems 

c. Often propose unique and clever responses 

d. Dare to take risks 

e. Likes to try 

f. Sensitive to the beauty and aesthetic aspects of the environment4 

Some techniques to spur the emergence of creativity according to Nursito are: 

a. aActive reading 

                                                 
3 Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka 

Cipta. p 17 
4 Etti Nurhayati. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. p 10 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

77

b. Fond of doing the study 

c. Giat berapresiasif 

d. Loved the value of art 

e. Respective to developments 

f. Produce a number of works 

g. Can provide examples of things that other people need.5 

According to Munandar the importance of creativity development has four 

reasons, namely: 

1. By being creative, one can manifest himself, his self-manifestation, the 

manifestation of himself is one of the basic needs in human life. According to 

Maslow (Munandar, 2009) creativity is also a manifestation of a person who is 

fully functioning in his manifestation. 

2. Creativity or creative thinking as the ability to see possibilities for solving a 

problem is a form of thinking in education. In schools that are primarily trained 

are the acceptance of knowledge, memory, and reasoning (logical thinking) 

3. Brain yourself creatively not only benefits the person and the environment but 

also gives satisfaction to the individual 

4. Creativity is what allows humans to improve their quality of life.6 

 
Learning Ability 

Ability comes from the word capable which means the power to do something, 

while the ability means ability, skill, and strength. Ability means the capacity of an 

individual to perform various tasks in a job. From these definitions can be concluded 

that the ability is the ability or the ability of an individual in mastering a skill and used 

to do various tasks in a job. 

Further, Robbins and. Judge states that the overall ability of an individual 

basically consists of two sets of factors, they are: 

a. Intellectual Ability, is the ability needed to perform various mental activities 

(thinking, reasoning and solving problems). 

                                                 
5 Nursito. (1999). Kiat Menggali Kreativitas. Yogyakarta : Mitra Gama Widya. hlm 34 
6 Utami Munandar .(2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta:Rineka cipta. 

P. 31 



Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

78 

b. Physical Ability, is the ability to perform tasks that demand stamina, skills, 

strength, and similar characteristics.7 

Learning relates to a person's behavior change to a particular situation caused by 

his repeated experience in the situation. Learning occurs when a mutual stimulus / 

stimulus situation affects a person so that his / her performance changes from the time 

before he experiences a situation to the time after he or she experiences the situation. 

According to Morgan in Introduction to Psychology (1978) learning is any relatively 

settled change in behavior that occurs as a result of practice or experience. According to 

the core gestalt of learning is gain insight. Insight is the acquisition of problem solving 

or the problem8  

In the process of learning there are differences in fundamental ways in each 

person in the transfer or absorption of knowledge. The ways of learning are also called 

learning styles. Learning styles are defined as a combination of how information is 

absorbed, organized and processed. Thus, a person's learning style is a combination of 

how he absorbs an information, then organizes and processes the information.  

 
METHODOLOGY 

This research was conducted at Muhammadiyah University of North Sumatera 

which is located at Captain Muchtar Basri No. 3 Medan.Penelitian will be conducted in 

two years. The first year starts in November 2016 until July 2017 and continues in the 

second year beginning in September 2017 until May 2018. 

Data collection techniques in this study are: 1) Observation: To obtain data about 

the condition of students and the learning process in each study program that exist 

within the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Universitaas Muhammadiyah 

Sumatera Utara. 2) Questionnaire: Questionnaire instrument is used to analyze and 

evaluate students' creativity and learning ability before and after application of 

connected learning model. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                                                 
7 Ibid, hlm 57-61  
8 Sumadi Suryabrata (2010). Metodelogi Penelitian, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. p 277 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

79

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 
Research Result Description 
1. First Analyss of Research Results 

 The research was conducted at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education 

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. The subject of the research is the 

students of mathematics education in the education management course. 

Before the action research is conducted, the research first conduct the initial test given 

to the students with the aim to know the students' early ability in understanding the 

material. 

 This knowledge is done in order to conform to what is expected by the researcher. 

Is it true that the student of mathematics education needs to be given appropriate 

action by using Integrated Connected Learning Model (Connected) model to improve 

students' creativity and learning ability, to measure the ability of students are given 

tests as many as 5 pieces. 

 From the results of student work on the initial test given, it can be known the 

initial ability of students about the material got results that have not been satisfactory, 

hence the action needs to be done. 

Based on the above description of the student's learning ability test results can be seen 

in the following table: 

Table 1.  
Learning Ability Results in the Initial Test 

Many students are completed 7 

Many Unfinished Students 32 

Complete Classical Percentage 17,94% 

Uncomplicated Classical Percentage 82,05% 

  
 
2. Description of Implementation Results in Cycle I 

 The procedure or steps of implementation of class action in cycle I are as follows: 

a) Action planning I is done to overcome the problems experienced by 

students in understanding the concept on the material function. Problem 

solving is done by implementing the learning that has been planned in RPP.  

b) The steps taken are to conduct curriculum analysis to find out basic 

competence to be submitted to students by using Integrated Learning 

Method Type Connected (Connected). Creating an observation sheet to see 



Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

80 

student creativity during the learning process takes place using Connected 

Type Integrated Learning (Connected) method. Creating instruments used 

in the research cycle consisting of tests and observation sheets. Develop an 

evaluation tool in the form of a choice test. Test given as many as 5 

questions. 

 

Implementation of action I 

At this stage the researcher acts as a lecturer explaining briefly the 

material by using Integrated Connected Learning method 

 

Observation of action I 

  During the learning activities using Integrated Learning Method Type 

Connected (Connected) took place implemented, it appears that the observations on 

the creativity of students have not shown the desired results during the learning 

process takes place. 

Based on the results of observations that have been done in the first cycle 

then in the percentage of creativity that is on the diligent aspects of questioning 

is 42.30%, on the aspect of attention is 39.10%, then on the aspect of giving 

opinion is 42.30% and the last on the aspect of participation is 41.02%.  

So from the four aspects it can be seen that the diligent aspects of asking 

questions and giving aspects of opinion get a higher percentage value. Where the 

average value of creativity percentage obtained by 26.39%. 

Table 2.  
Observation of Creativity at Cycle 1 

 

No Aspects Observed Persentase 

1 Diligently asked 42,30% 

2 Focus  39,10% 

3 Giving reason  42,30% 

4 Participation 41,02% 

Average 26,39% 

Note Very less 

 
 The conclusion of the observation of student creativity in cycle I is in the diligent 

aspect of questioning can be categorized less good because only reach the percentage 

value of 42,30%, and at attention aspect can be categorized very less good because on ly 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

81

reach percentage value equal to 39,10%, then the aspect of giving the opinion is 

categorized as less good because it only reaches the percentage of 42.30% and the last 

in the aspect of participation is also in the category of less good because the percentage 

is only 41.02%. 

The result of the students' understanding of the taught material can be 

seen on the following table: 

Table 3.  
Learning Ability Results In Cycle I 

Many students are finished 14 

Many students are not complete 25 

Complete classical percentage 35,89% 

Unfinished classical percentage 64,10% 

 
 The conclusion of the first cycle is that the students' learning ability has 

improved, ie the initial test has 7 complete students and 32 unfinished students, after 

the first cycle becomes 14 completed students and 25 unfinished students. With the 

calculation of the ability to learn classically on the initial test is 17.94% and in the first 

cycle is 35.89% so the initial test increase is 17.95%. 

 
Hasil Lembar Observasi Aktivitas Dosen Pada Model Pembelajaran Terpadu 

Tipe     Connected (Terhubung) pada siklus I Dimana setelah melalukan observasi 

kreativitas dan ketuntasan belajar mahasiswa maka dilakukan juga observasi aktivitas 

guru, hasil hasil observasi dosen terhadap materi yang diajarkan dapat diliat pada 

tebel berikut : 

Table 4.  
Result of Lecturer Observation Sheet on Cycle I 

 

No Indicator Amount 

1 Action Planning 2 

2 Implementation of Action 2 

3 Observation 2,5 

4 Reflection / Assessment 2 

Average 2,1 

Note Enough 

  
 Conclusion of observation of lecturer activity in cycle I that is observation 

indicator get highest value compared with other indicator. the observation indicator 



Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

82 

gets a value of 2.5. The average score obtained on the lecturer's observation activity is 

2. 

 

Reflection 

 Judging from the data of student creativity observation it can be concluded that 

the creativity of students is still very poor because the average value of the percentage 

achieved in the first cycle only amounted to 26.39% and the value is still included very 

bad categorize then student creativity observation continued on cycle II. 

 Based on the data of students' existing learning ability, it can be concluded that 

there is an increase in student learning outcomes from the initial test to the le arning 

ability test I. In the initial test the classical learning completeness 17.94% with an 

average value of 49.74. In the learning ability test I learned mastery learning classically 

to 35.89% with an average value of 62.69. Then the increase of 17.95%. The increase in 

the results of this learner is not in accordance with the expected because the level of 

mastery learning has not yet been achieved. So it is necessary to re-do the improvement 

of learning that can maximize student learning outcomes. 

 In the implementation of action I still have some weaknesses among students 

who are less active and still afraid to express opinions or ask questions. For that 

researchers need to motivate students to actively learn and provide opportunities for 

students to ask, either to the lecturer or peers, so that students are more active in the 

learning process. Therefore it is followed by the implementation of class II cycle action. 

  

Description of the results of the implementation of cycle II 

  The results of the second cycle of action in this study are described as follows: 

 

Action Planning II 

  In the planning phase in cycle II the lecturers give more motivation to the 

students to be more active in asking questions by giving special value from the lecturer, 

and expect more and more students to answer the problem well. Maximizing guiding 

students as well as deepening of material for those who have not reached mastery 

learning by using Integrated Learning Method Type Connected. 

 

 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

83

Implementation of Action II 

At this stage the researcher acts as a re-explaining briefly the material about the 

function by using Integrated Learning Method Type Connected (Connected)c. 

Pengamatan Tindakan  II 

  During the learning activities using Integrated Learning Method Type 

Connected (Connected) took place implemented, it appears that the observation on 

student creativity shows the desired results during the learning process takes place. 

  Observation of student creativity by using Integrated Learning Method 

Connected Type (Connected) by using observation sheet containing four observed 

aspects. Based on the results of observations that have been done in the second cycle 

then the percentage of creativity that is on the diligent aspect of asking is equal to 

67.95%, the attention aspect is 71.79%, then the aspect of giving is 73.72% and last the 

participation aspect was 73.08%. So from these four aspects can be seen that the aspect 

of giving opinions that get the highest percentage value. Where the average value of 

creativity percentage is obtained equal to 71,63%. 

Table 5  
Observation of Creativity in Cycle II 

 

No Aspects observed Persentase 

1 Diligently asked 67,95% 

2 Attention 71,79% 

3 Giving an opinion 73,72% 

4 Participation 73,08% 

Average 71,63% 

Note Good 

  
  The conclusion of the observation of student creativity in cycle II that is on the 

diligent aspect of questioning can be categorized enough because it has reached the 

percentage value of 67,95%, and at attention aspect can be categorized either because 

it reaches percentage value equal to 71,79%, then at aspect give opinion categorized 

both because it has reached the percentage of 73.72% and the last on the aspect of 

participation is also categorized either because the percentage of 73.08%. 

The result of the students' understanding of the taught material can be seen on 

the following table: 

Table 6 
Learning Ability Results In Cycle III 



Diani Syahputri, Elfrianto 
 

84 

Many students complete 34 

Many students are not complete 5 

Complete classical percentage 87,18 % 

Unfinished classical percentage 12,82 % 

 
Conclusion data above data can be seen cycle II experience improvement that 

is cycle II tedapat 22 complete student and 17 student unfinished, after cycle II become 

34 student complete and 5 student unfinished. By classical calculation in cycle II is 

56,41% complete student and in cycle II is 87,18%. So the increase of cycle I to II is 

30.77%. 

Result of Observation Sheet of Teacher Activity on Integrated Learning Model 

Type Connected (Connected) on cycle II. Where after melalukan observation of 

creativity and student's learning ability is also done observation of lecturer activity, 

the result of observation of teacher to the material which is studied can be seen on the 

following table: 

Table 7.  
Result of Lecturer Observation Sheet on Cycle II 

No Indicators Amount 

1 Action Planning 4 

2 Implementation of Action 3,5 

3 Observation 4 

4 Reflection / Assessment 4 

Average 3,8 

Note Very Good 

 
 The conclusion of the observation of lecturer activity in cycle II that is on indicator 

of action implementation get the lowest value compared with other indicator. The 

action implementation indicator scores 3.5. The average score obtained on the teacher 

activity observation is 3.8. 

 

Reflection  

Judging from the observation data of student creativity in cycle II that has 

reached the average value of the percentage of 71.63% of the average value in cycle II 

is included in the category of either the activity of student creativity observation 

stopped until cycle II just because it has reached the desired value . From the result of 

observation sheet of lecturer activity has shown good result, with average value 3,8 as 

expected in teaching and learning activity. 



The Ingrated Learning Model Type of “Connected” in Increasing the Students’ 
Learning Creativity and Ability 

DOI: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018010406 
 

85

 
CONCLUSION 

 Based on the description of the discussion in this study, the following 

conclusions can be drawn: 

1.    By using Integrated Learning Method Connected Type (Connected) can 

improve creativity and learning ability. 

2.   The average score on the percentage of students' creativity observation in the 

first cycle reached 26.39%, an increase in cycle II to 71.63% 

3.    The average value on the results of learning ability observations in the first 

cycle reached 35.89% increase in cycle II to 87.18% 

4.    Students' creativity and learning ability has made significant progress. 

5.    Students' understanding of lecture material shows improvement. Can be seen 

from the level of mastery of students' learning ability in a classical, before using 

the model of learning with Integrated Learning method Type Connected. 

6.    During the course of the study, the students looked enthusiastic to study 

harder. 

 
BIBILIOGRAPHY 

Anik, P. (2007). Mengembangkan Kreativitas Dan Kecerdasan Anak. Jakarta: Buku kita.  

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, 

Jakarta: Balai Pustaka 

DePorter, B. dan Hernacki. (2002). Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa  

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta:Rineka cipta.  

Nurhayati, E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.  

Nursito. (1999). Kiat Menggali Kreativitas. Yogyakarta : Mitra Gama Widya.  

Robbins, S. P dan Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational Behavior, New Jerse: Pearson 

Education, lnc,  

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.  

Suryabrata, S. (2010). Metodelogi Penelitian, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.  

Trianto. (2007). Model Pembelajaran dalam Teori dan Praktek.  Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka 

Publisher.