Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Volume 39, Article 3 June 2010 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) IV. Genus Eratoneura Dmitry A. Dmitriev and Christopher H. Dietrich Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William Shilts, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Brian D. Anderson, Director I-Building 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, Illinois 61820 217-333-6880 Citation: Dmitriev, D.A., and C.H. Dietrich. 2010. Review of the species of New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). IV. Genus Eratoneura. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 39(3):79–258. For permissions, contact the Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability. Editor: Charles Warwick US ISSN 0073-4918 US ISBN 1-882932-24-2 © 2010 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. Printed with soy ink on recycled and recyclable paper. The University of Illinois will not engage in discrimination or harassment against any person because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, disability, sexual orientation including gender identity, unfavorable discharge from the military or status as a protected veteran and will comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination, equal opportunity and affirmative action laws, orders and regulations. This nondiscrimination policy applies to admissions, employment, access to and treatment in University programs and activities. University complaint and grievance procedures provide employees and students with the means for the resolution of complaints that allege a violation of this Statement. Inquiries or complaints may be addressed to the Director and Assistant Chancellor, Office of Equal Opportunity and Access, 601 East John Street, Swanlund Administra- tion Building, (217) 333-0885, fax (217) 244-9136, TTY (217) 244-9850 or the Associate Provost and Director, Academic Human Resources, Henry Administration Building, (217) 333-6747, fax (217) 244-5584. For other University of Illinois information, contact University Directory Assistance at 333-1000. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 79 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). IV. Genus Eratoneura Dmitry A. Dmitriev and Christopher H. Dietrich AbSTRACT The 197 species (including 2 new species) of the Nearctic leafhopper genus Eratoneura are reviewed. Eratoneura betulae sp.n. from New Brunswick (Canada) and E. mcateei sp.n. from the central and northeastern USA are described as new. In addition, 123 new synonyms are recognized and a lectotype is designated for Typhlocyba hartii Gillette. A key is provided for identification of males. All known species are illustrated, and data on their distributions and host plants are sum- marized. All species of Eratoneura are native to temperate North America, where they feed and oviposit mainly on woody deciduous trees and shrubs. KEyWoRdS: Auchenorrhyncha, distribution, Homoptera, identification, leafhopper, morphol- ogy, taxonomy. Vol. 39 Art.380 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin INTRoduCTIoN This revision of the genus Eratoneura com- pletes the series of publications on the New World Erythroneurini (Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a, 2007a, 2008a; Dmitriev & Dietrich, 2007a, 2009a). Eratoneura was described by Young (1952b) as a subgenus of Erythroneura Fitch to comprise the Erythroneura maculata species group designated by Robinson (1926a) and comprehensively revised by Beamer in series of publications (1931a, b, c, d, 1932a, c, d, e, f, g, h). In these papers Beamer provided illustrations of the male genitalia for all known species, incorporated these characters into a dichotomous key, and associated males with most of the species and varieties (=subspecies, see ICZN, 1999, Art. 45.6.4) that had been described by McAtee (1920a, 1924c, 1924d, 1926c) and previous authors based on females. Johnson (1935a) independently revised the species of Erythroneura sensu lato (including Eratoneura) from Ohio and provided a key for their identification. She described many new species in this and subsequent papers (Knull, 1944b, 1945b, 1949a, 1951a, 1954b, 1955a; Knull & Auten, 1937a, 1938b). After these revi- sions, H.H. Ross (with D.M. DeLong) and L.W. Hepner described more than 150 additional species of Eratoneura. Dietrich and Dmitriev (2006a) revised the generic classification of the New World Erythroneurini and elevated Eratoneura to the genus level. All species of Eratoneura are native to temperate North America, where they feed and oviposit mainly on woody deciduous trees and shrubs. Ross (1957c, 1958c) did an extensive study of coexisting Eratoneura species on sycamore in southern Illinois. Adults overwin- ter in leaf litter, and in the spring, they emerge and feed on the new leaves of early-emerging deciduous plants before migrating to their “definitive” summer host plants where they mate and lay eggs (Ross & DeLong 1953a). Most species oviposit and undergo nymphal development on a single, or a group of closely related, plant species. In the southern USA, they complete two or more generations per year, but in the north there may be but a single generation. In the fall, adults may again feed on a variety host plants prior to seeking out winter shelter in leaf litter. Most species of Eratoneura have no known economic importance, but a few are recorded as pests of apple (Beamer, 1930a, 1932b; Hamilton, 1985a). MATERIAl ANd METHodS Few previous workers have specifically targeted Eratoneura in their collecting, and specimens from trap catches and other gen- eral collecting that find their way into curated collections are often in very poor condition. Be- cause of this, and due to time and budget con- straints, this study focused only on collections known to contain large numbers of well-curated specimens of Eratoneura, as well as those housing primary types: Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS), Ohio State University (OSU), University of Kansas Natural History Museum (KSEM), Mississippi State University, Missis- sippi Entomological Museum (MEM), Cana- dian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (CNC), Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Califor- nia Academy of Sciences (CAS), and Colorado State University (CSUC). The numbers of studied specimens from each collection are summarized in Appendix 1. Future collecting will undoubtedly show that the distributions of most species are much broader than indicated on the maps accompanying individual species treatments. Although these maps show regional biases reflecting the locations and holdings of the studied collections, they are based on vouchered collection records and, thus, ac- curately reflect current knowledge of species distributions. On the maps the type locality is marked with a star. Identification of species was mainly based on type material. In some cases, when the type was not located, or the holotype is a female (e.g., most of McAtee’s species), we followed Beamer’s interpretation, based on study of dissected male specimens that he labeled “al- lotype” to indicate that they had been com- pared to the female primary types of previous workers. Although Beamer’s “allotypes” have no official standing in nomenclature, these dissected male specimens facilitate unambigu- ous interpretation of Beamer’s concept of the species. Morphological terminology follows Dietrich and Dmitriev (2006a, see also Fig. 1). Although individual species have a character- istic color pattern, details and intensity may be highly variable both inter- and intraspecifically. Overwintering individuals tend to be more brightly colored than adults of the summer generation of the same species. This has re- Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 81 sulted in many species being described multiple times based on different color forms. In the descriptions below, the pattern of fully colored individuals is described, although completely or almost completely discolored forms are known for most species. Thus, identification keys are based mainly on male genitalia, with external characters used only for supplemental purposes. This work recognizes numerous synonyms treated as valid species by previous workers. Most junior synonyms represent color variants, or forms differing slightly in the shape of the aedeagus, or the shape and length of the pygofer appendages. A few species were described based on aberrant forms with distorted genitalia, possibly caused by parasitism. In some cases where genitalia were mounted on slides, species were described based on contaminant particles embedded in the balsam. Each species is illustrated by one or more habitus photos taken using a Microptics digi- tal imaging system. Original drawings were prepared only in cases where those available from other sources were deemed inaccurate. Thus, numerous figures are reproduced from other sources, as noted in the figure captions. Inconsistencies (e.g., in line thickness) among line drawings reflect differences in the drawing styles of previous authors. In all cases, figures reproduced from previous publications are either in the public domain or are reproduced with permission. Line drawings of the male genitalia ac- companying each species treatment are labeled as follows: a – pygofer or pygofer appendage, lateral view; b – pygofer or pygofer appendage, dorsal view; c – style or style apex, broad aspect; d – aedeagus, lateral view; e – aedeagus, posteroventral or ventral view. Nomenclatural, distributional, morphologi- cal and host-plant data summarized below were extracted from a relational specimen-level da- tabase of Erythroneurini (Dmitriev & Dietrich, 2003 onwards), developed using the 3I software package (Dmitriev, 2006a, Dmitriev & Dietrich, 2008a). The on-line database provides more de- tailed information for each species, including a complete list of specimens examined, photos of type specimens, and interactive key to species. In the species treatments below, only sum- mer host plants are listed, although most species have also been collected from plants other than their oviposition hosts. Specimens of newly described taxa (E. betulae sp.n. and E. mcateei sp.n.) are depos- ited in the insect collections of the Illinois Natural History Survey (Champaign), Cana- dian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (Ontario), and Mississippi State University (State College). TAxoNoMy Subfamily Typhlocybinae Tribe Erythroneurini Young, 1952 Genus Eratoneura Young, 1952 Erythroneura maculata species group Robinson, 1926a:109 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) Young, 1952b:84 (Type: Erythroneura dira Beamer, 1931) Eratoneura Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:133 diagnosis: Ground color usually pale, often with red or orange maculae distributed on dor- sum and black or dark brown spots near costal margin and in inner apical cell; crown without pair of brown or black spots. Male pygofer without ventral appendage or sclerotized ridge; dorsal appendage immovably fused to margin, simple or bifurcated, with additional small projection at base; basolateral setae well devel- oped. Style apex usually with three angulate projections. description: Length 2.3–3.7 mm, slender. Head narrower than pronotum. Crown fore margin produced, angulate or rounded. Ocelli absent or vestigial. Face depressed in pro- file, less than 45° from horizontal. Pronotum smooth, without conspicuous pits. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide or longer; second apical cell basally truncate (ir crossvein present); third apical cell parallel sided, straight; CuP vein longer than segment of CuA between Cu and MP; inner apical cell with oblique base, basal segment of CuA and CuP veins forming continuous line; Pcu vein not visible. Hind wing apex truncate; submar- ginal vein not extended to wing apex; ScR vein present; MP and CuA veins touching at one point, fused for short distance or separated by m-cu crossvein. Front femur anteroventral Vol. 39 Art.382 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin row with basal seta distinctly larger than oth- ers. 2S abdominal apodemes variable, small, narrow and short to large, broad, and extended beyond posterior margin of sternite III (3S). Py- gofer not extended to apex of subgenital plate; lobe rounded or angulate; dorsal emargination extended to base of segment; dorsal membrane without fine setae; oblique dorsolateral inter- nal ridge not developed; basolateral setae in distinct group, small; distal and dorsal setae undifferentiated; internal surface of lobe with setae; sparse long fine setae present; microtri- chia well developed. Pygofer dorsal append- age immovably fused to margin, without basal suture; appendage simple or bifurcated, with additional small projection at base; ventral appendage or sclerotized ridge absent. Sternite IX with median longitudinal internal ridge. Subgenital plates free; lateral margin with angulate subbasal projection; section basad of medial constriction shorter than distal section; with 4 basal macrochaetae uniseriate along margin; distinct marginal subbasal rigid setae forming continuous row; distal macrochaetae absent. Style free; preapical lobe prominent; apex smooth with 3 points or rarely truncated. Aedeagus articulated to connective; with dorsal apodeme broadly expanded in lateral view; apodeme parallel sided in ventral view, connec- tion to pygofer membranous. Aedeagus shaft symmetrical, usually denticulate distally, some- times with basal or distal processes. Connective U- or V-shaped, without median anterior lobe, with long arms. Anal tube without processes. Coloration variable, but all known species with crown lacking pair of fuscous preapical spots. Usual color pattern (see E. dira Beamer, Plate 1a, 2a, for example) consisting of pale or dull yellow dorsum with red or orange maculae distributed on crown thorax and forewings and black or dark brown spots near costal margin and near base of inner apical cell. distribution: Temperate North America. Host plants: Deciduous trees, shrubs. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 83 Key to Adult Males of Eratoneura1 1. Aedeagus with pair of slender distal processes (Fig. 2e, 3e). .......................................................2 1’. Aedeagus without slender distal processes (Fig. 1e, 9e ). ........................................................... 8 2(1). Aedeagus with pair of processes arising at base or near midlength of shaft (Fig. 2d, e). ....... 3 2’. Aedeagus without processes arising at base or near midlength of shaft (Fig. 5d, e). ................. 4 3(2). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad, processes arising near midlength of shaft (Fig. 2d, e). Dorsal pygofer appendage extended to pygofer apex (Fig. 2a, b). ............ 2. E. gillettei (Beamer) 3’. Aedeagal shaft curved ventrad, processes arising at base of shaft (Fig. 3d, e). Dorsal pygofer appendage not extended to pygofer apex (Fig. 3a, b). .......................................................... ..................................................................................... 3. E. imbricariae (Ross & DeLong) 4(2). Tip of aedeagal shaft with short dorsal projection; distal processes extended ventrolaterad (Fig. 4d, 5d). ...................................................................................................................... 5 4’. Tip of aedeagal shaft without dorsal projection; distal processes extended dorsolaterad (Fig. 6d). ............................................................................................................................ 6 5(4). Distal processes of aedeagus about as long as shaft (Fig. 4e). ................................................... ......................................................................................... 4. E. lamucata (Ross & DeLong) 5’. Distal processes of aedeagus about half as long as shaft (Fig. 5e). ...... 5. E. maculata (Gillette) 6(4). Third point of style apex longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 6c). Distal processes of aedeagus arising subapically, shorter then half length of shaft (Fig. 6e). ........ .............................................................................................. 6. E. eversi (Ross & DeLong) 6’. Third point of style apex shorter than half distance between other two points (Fig. 7c, 8c). Dis- tal processes of aedeagus arising apically, almost as long as shaft (Fig. 7e). .................... 7 7(6). Third point of style apex short toothlike, subequal in size to second point (Fig. 7c). Aedeagal shaft with prominent lateral lobes, smooth (Fig. 7d, e). Pygofer appendage compressed (Fig. 7a, b). .............................................................................. 7. E. noncuspidis (Beamer) 7’. Third point of style apex almost as long as half distance between other two points (Fig. 8c). Aedeagal shaft without lateral lobes, with teeth (Fig. 8d, e). Pygofer appendage not com- pressed (Fig. 8a, b). ............................................................................. 8. E. teshi (Hepner) 8(1). Aedeagus with pair of processes arising at base of shaft (Fig. 9d, e, 10d, e). ......................... 9 8’. Aedeagus without processes arising at base of shaft (Fig. 17d, e). .......................................... 15 9(8). Pygofer appendage not extended to pygofer apex, bulbous subapically (Fig. 9a, b). Forewing basal half uniformly red (Plate 2i). ................................................ 9. E. osborni (DeLong) 9’. Pygofer appendage extended to or beyond pygofer apex, not bulbous subapically (Fig. 10a, b). Forewing basal half yellow with reddish maculae (Plate 2a). ......................................... 10 10(9). Third point of style apex longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 10c). Pygofer appendage curved upward, widest at midlength (Fig. 10a). Basal processes of aedeagus small toothlike (Fig. 10d, e). ....................................................... 10. E. sandersoni (Ross) 10’. Third point of style apex shorter than distance between other two points (Fig. 11c). Pygofer appendage straight or curved downward, widest at base (Fig. 11a). Basal processes of aedeagus longer (Fig. 11d, e). ......................................................................................... 11 1 An interactive key for species of Eratoneura is available at: http://ctap.inhs.uiuc.edu/dmitriev/ Vol. 39 Art.384 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 11(10). Pygofer appendage with ring of long spines near midlength (Fig. 11a, b). Aedeagal shaft strongly compressed, with dorsal carina or distal lobe; basal processes appressed to shaft (Fig. 11d, e). .................................................................................................................... 12 11’. Pygofer appendage without ring of long spines (Fig. 14a, b). Aedeagal shaft without dorsal carina or distal lobe; basal processes divergent from shaft (Fig. 14d, e). ....................... 13 12(11). Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view, only about twice as long as wide; basal processes extended along dorsal margin of shaft (Fig. 11d). ........................ 11. E. crinita (Beamer) 12’. Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view, more than 5 time as long as wide; basal processes extended along ventral margin of shaft (Fig. 12d). .................. 12. E. andersoni (Beamer) 13(11). Third point of style apex longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 13c). Aedeagal shaft broad (Fig. 13d). Larger (3.5–3.7 mm). Forewing with two large reddish patches (Plate 2m1). .................................................................... 13. E. paraesculi (Knull) 13’. Third point of style apex shorter than half distance between other two points (Fig. 14c). Aedeagal shaft slender (Fig. 14d). Smaller (2.8–3.1 mm). Forewing with usual maculate pattern (Plate 2n). ............................................................................................................ 14 14(13). Preatrium much shorter than aedeagal shaft; basal processes almost as long as shaft (Fig. 14d). ......................................................................14. E. tammina (Ross & DeLong) 14’. Preatrium about as long as aedeagal shaft; basal processes shorter than half length of shaft (Fig. 15d). ...................................................................................... 15. E. texana (Beamer) 15(8). Pygofer appendage (not including small basal projection) bifurcate or expanded at apex (Fig. 22a, 27a). ............................................................................................................... 16 15’. Pygofer appendage not bifurcate or expanded at apex (sometimes expanded near midlength) (Fig. 68a, 80a). ................................................................................................................ 52 16(15). Pygofer appendage bifurcate near base (Fig. 18a). ........................................................... 17 16’. Pygofer appendage bifurcate far from base or expanded near apex (Fig. 22a, 27a). ............. 22 17(16). Third point of style apex longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 16c). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad, tip abruptly bent dorsad (Fig. 16d). .................................... ....................................................................................................... 16. E. separata (Beamer) 17’. Third point of style apex short toothlike or absent (Fig. 17c). Aedeagal shaft straight, tip not bent dorsad (Fig. 17d). .................................................................................................... 18 18(17). Ventral branch of pygofer appendage abruptly curved upward in distal third (Fig. 17a). ..... ........................................................................................................17. E. curvata (Beamer) 18’. Ventral branch of pygofer appendage straight or smoothly curved (Fig. 18a). ...................... 19 19(18). Branches of pygofer appendage converging distally, subequal in width or dorsal branch wider (Fig. 18a). ........................................................................... 18. E. restricta (Beamer) 19’. Branches of pygofer appendage not converging distally, ventral branch wider than dorsal (Fig. 19a). ........................................................................................................................ 20 20(19). Pygofer appendage extended ventrocaudad, not reaching pygofer apex (Fig. 19a). Aedea- gal shaft broad in lateral view, gradually narrowing towards apex, without lateral lobes at base (Fig. 19d, e). ........................................................................... 19. E. impar (Beamer) 20’. Pygofer appendage extended caudad along dorsal margin of pygofer, reaching pygofer apex (Fig. 20a). Aedeagal shaft in lateral view more slender, parallel-sided, with lateral lobes at base (Fig. 20d, e, 21d, e). ............................................................................................ 21 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 85 21(20). Ventral branch of pygofer appendage evenly tapering towards apex (Fig. 20a). ................... ....................................................................................................... 20. E. carmini (Beamer) 21’. Ventral branch of pygofer appendage parallel sided through most of length, abruptly narrow- ing at apex (Fig. 21a). .................................................................... 21. E. forfex (Beamer) 22(16). Third point of style apex about as long as or longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 22c). ........................................................................................................................ 23 22’. Third point of style apex about as long as or shorter than half distance between other two points (Fig. 36c, 37c). ..................................................................................................... 37 23(22). Apex of pygofer appendage with numerous spines (Fig. 22a, 23a). ................................. 24 23’. Apex of pygofer appendage bifurcate, without spines (Fig. 24a). .......................................... 25 24(23). Aedeagal shaft more than twice as long as wide in lateral view, with lateral lobes not broader than shaft in ventral view (Fig. 22d, e). Third point of style apex evenly curved (Fig. 22c). ......................................................................................... 22. E. linea (Beamer) 24’. Aedeagal shaft less than twice as long as wide in lateral view, with lateral lobes broader than shaft in ventral view (Fig. 23d, e). Third point of style apex sinuate (Fig. 23c). ................ ........................................................................................ 23. E. rangifer (Ross & DeLong) 25(23). Tip of aedeagal shaft expanded in ventral view, abruptly bent dorsad in lateral view (Fig. 24d, e). ................................................................................. 24. E. dimidiata (Knull) 25’. Tip of aedeagal shaft not expanded in ventral view, not bent dorsad in lateral view (Fig. 25d, e). ..............................................................................................................................26 26(25). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection through length (Fig. 25d, e). ......................................... .............................................................................................. 25. E. sanctaerosae (Hepner) 26’. Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 26d, e, 27d, e). ................................................................... 27 27(26). Aedeagal shaft about as long as wide in ventral view (Fig. 27e). ..................................... 28 27’. Aedeagal shaft about 1.5 times as long as wide in ventral view (Fig. 31e). ........................... 31 28(27). Aedeagal shaft triangular in ventral view (Fig. 26e). Branches of pygofer appendage crossed in dorsal view (Fig. 26b). ........................................................ 26. E. betulae sp.n. 28’. Aedeagal shaft round in ventral view (Fig. 27e, 28e). Branches of pygofer appendage not crossed in dorsal view (Fig. 28b). ................................................................................... 29 29(28). Aedeagus with ventral hump (Fig. 27d). Pygofer appendage directed caudad (Fig. 27a). Larger (2.9–3.2 mm). .................................................................... 27. E. concisa (Beamer) 29’. Aedeagus without ventral hump (Fig. 28d). Pygofer appendage curved dorsad (Fig. 28a). Smaller (2.4–2.6 mm). ........................................................ 28. E. spala (Ross & DeLong) 30(27). Dorsal branch of pygofer appendage less than half length of ventral branch, sharply curved outward at right angle (Fig. 29a, b). ................................................. 29. E. harpola (Ross) 30’. Dorsal branch of pygofer appendage, if shorter than ventral branch, not curved outward (Fig. 31a, b). ............................................................................................................................ 31 31(30). Aedeagal shaft narrowing towards apex in ventral view (Fig. 30e, 31e). ......................... 32 31’. Aedeagal shaft parallel sided in ventral view (Fig. 33e). ....................................................... 34 Vol. 39 Art.386 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 32(31). Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 30d). Branches of pygofer appendage diver- gent at obtuse angle (Fig. 30a). Forewing color pattern consisting of small reddish macu- lae (Plate 3i). ................................................................................... 30. E. minor (Beamer) 32’. Aedeagal shaft curved ventrad in lateral view (Fig. 32d). Branches of pygofer appendage divergent at acute angle (Fig. 32a). Forewing with large reddish patches (Plate 3j, k). ...... ...........................................................................................................................................33 33(32). Larger (2.9–3.1 mm). Forewing with single large spot at base (Plate 3j1). ............................ ........................................................................................................ 31. E. aesculi (Beamer) 33’. Smaller (2.7–2.9 mm). Forewing with two smaller spots: one at base, another at apex of cla- vus (Plate 3k). ................................................................................. 32. E. bifida (Beamer) 34(31). Branches of pygofer appendage divergent at acute angle (Fig. 33a). Smaller (2.5–2.7 mm). Coloration usual for genus with small reddish maculae (Plate 3l). ..................................... ..................................................................................................... 33. E. aculeata (Beamer) 34’. Branches of pygofer appendage divergent at about 90° angle (Fig. 34a, 35a). Larger (2.7–3.2 mm). Forewings with enlarged reddish patches (Plate 3m, n). ........................................ 35 35(34). Ventral branch of pygofer appendage longer than dorsal branch (Fig. 34a). Smaller (2.7–2.9 mm). ........................................................................... 34. E. lusoria (Van Duzee) 35’. Ventral branch of pygofer appendage shorter than dorsal branch (Fig. 35a). Larger (2.9–3.2 mm). .................................................................................................. 35. E. pyra (McAtee) 36(22). Branches of pygofer appendage at least half as long as appendage, parallel to each other (Fig. 36a). .......................................................................... 36. E. millsi (Ross & DeLong) 36’. Branches of pygofer appendage much shorter than half length of appendage, divergent, or ap- pendage not bifurcated but expanded at apex (Fig. 37a, 38a). ....................................... 37 37(36). Preatrium of aedeagus as long as or shorter than half length of aedeagal shaft (Fig. 37d). Branches of pygofer appendage long (Fig. 37a). ..................... 37. E. longifurca (Hepner) 37’. Preatrium of aedeagus about as long as aedeagal shaft (Fig. 38d). ........................................ 38 38(37). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad at right angle near base (Fig. 38d). .. 38. E. manus (Beamer) 38’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view or only slightly curved (Fig. 39d). ............................ 39 39(38). Second point of style apex prominent (Fig. 39c). Apex of pygofer appendage abruptly curved downward, then recurved, denticulate (Fig. 39a). ........... 39. E. staffordi (Hepner) 39’. Second point of style apex short toothlike (Fig. 41c). Apex of pygofer appendage not as above. .............................................................................................................................. 40 40(39). Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft large, reaching apex of shaft (Fig. 40d, e). Mesonotum brownish (Plate 3s1). ..................................................................... 40. E. ardens (McAtee) 40’. Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft, if present, not reaching apex of shaft (Fig. 42d, e, 46d, e). Mesonotum not brownish (Fig. Plate 3q). ...................................................................... 41 41(40). Pygofer appendage broad in lateral view, denticulate along dorsal margin (Fig. 41a, 42a). . ................................................................................................................................................42 41’. Pygofer appendage, if broad in lateral view, not denticulate along dorsal margin (Fig. 43a). ..... .......................................................................................................................................... 43 42(41). Smaller (2.6–2.9 mm). Forewing with zigzag pattern (Plate 3t). . 41. E. uvaldeana (Knull) 42’. Larger (3.1–3.3 mm). Forewing with maculate pattern (Plate 4a). ....... 42. E. inepta (Beamer) 43(41). Pygofer appendage bifurcate at apex (Fig. 43a). ............................................................... 44 43’. Pygofer appendage expanded at apex, with multiple distal spines (Fig. 50a, 51a). ............... 50 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 87 44(43). Pygofer appendage expanded and compressed in distal half before bifurcation (Fig. 43a, b, 44a, b). ............................................................................................................................ 45 44’. Pygofer appendage not expanded in distal half, round in crossection (Fig. 48a, b). .............. 46 45(44). Pygofer appendage expanded and compressed only in distal half, thickened along dorsal margin, branches of fork divergent at acute angle (Fig. 43a). Aedeagal shaft with narrow lateral lobes at base, slender in lateral view (Fig. 43d, e). .............. 43. E. firma (Beamer) 45’. Pygofer appendage expanded and compressed throughout its length, not thickened along dor- sal margin, branches of fork divergent at obtuse angle (Fig. 44a). Aedeagal shaft with large lateral lobes, broad in lateral view (Fig. 44d, e). ............. 44. E. bispinosa (Beamer) 46(44). Ventral branch of pygofer appendage much longer and thicker than dorsal branch (Fig. 45a). ................................................................................. 45. E. hyalina (Knull & Auten) 46’. Ventral branch of pygofer appendage not longer or thicker than dorsal branch (Fig. 46a, 48a). ................................................................................................................................ 47 47(46). Pygofer appendage sinuate twice before bifurcation, ventral branch very short, toothlike (Fig. 46a, b). ................................................................................. 46. E. harnedi (Hepner) 47’. Pygofer appendage sinuate only once before bifurcation, ventral branch at least twice as long as broad (Fig. 47a, b, 48a, b). .......................................................................................... 48 48(47). Branches of pygofer appendage extended more or less horizontally, one branch about twice as long as other (Fig. 47a, b). .......................................................... 47. E. unica (Beamer) 48’. Branches of pygofer appendage extended one above other, of about equal length (Fig. 48a, b). ..........................................................................................................................................49 49(48). Branches of pygofer appendage of equal length, or ventral branch slightly longer, angle between branches about 90° (Fig. 48a). ........................................... 48. E. mira (Beamer) 49’. Ventral branch of pygofer appendage slightly shorter than dorsal branch, angle between branches acute (Fig. 49a). ............................................................... 49. E. facota (Beamer) 50(43). Pygofer appendage depressed (Fig. 50a, b). Smaller (2.6–2.8 mm). ..................................... ........................................................................................................... 50. E. cristata (Knull) 50’. Pygofer appendage not depressed (Fig. 51a, b). Larger (2.8–3 mm). .................................... 51 51(50). Pygofer appendage with blunt apex (Fig. 51a). Aedeagus with large lateral lobes at base (Fig. 51e). ............................................................................................ 51. E. mcateei sp.n. 51’. Pygofer appendage with pointed apex (Fig. 52a). Aedeagus without lateral lobes (Fig. 52e). ... ..................................................................................................... 52. E. ungulata (Beamer) 52(15). Aedeagus with basal processes arising near midlength of shaft (Fig. 53d, e). ....................... .......................................................................................... 53. E. distincta (Knull & Auten) 52’. Aedeagus without basal processes, with or without lateral lobes at base of shaft (Fig. 54d, e, 56d, e). ............................................................................................................................ 53 53(52). Pygofer appendage widest at middle (Fig. 54a, 57a). ....................................................... 54 53’. Pygofer appendage widest at base (Fig. 72a). ........................................................................ 70 54(53). Third point of style apex as long as or longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 54c, 55c). ......................................................................................................................... 55 54’. Third point of style apex distinctly shorter than distance between other two points (Fig. 62c). . ...........................................................................................................................................61 Vol. 39 Art.388 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 55(54). Aedeagal shaft strongly compressed, apex acuminate in ventral view (Fig. 54d, e). ....... 56 55’. Aedeagal shaft round or depressed in crossection, apex truncate in ventral view (Fig. 56d, e, 57d, e). ............................................................................................................................ 57 56(55). Pygofer appendage arising at middle of dorsal margin of pygofer lobe, its apex straight or slightly curved inward in dorsal view (Fig. 54a, b). ......................... 54. E. spinea (Knull) 56’. Pygofer appendage arising in basal third of dorsal margin of pygofer lobe, its apex curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 55a, b). .......................................... 55. E. rotunda (Beamer) 57(55). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection, without lateral lobes at base (Fig. 56d, e). Apex of pygofer appendage curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 56b). ............................................ ....................................................................................................56. E. nigriventer (Beamer) 57’. Aedeagal shaft depressed, with lateral lobes at base (Fig. 59d, e). Apex of pygofer appendage not curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 59b). ................................................................ 58 58(57). Aedeagal shaft short and broad in lateral view, only about 2 times as long as wide (Fig. 57d). Pygofer appendage curved upward in lateral view (Fig. 57a). ................................... ................................................................................................... 57. E. stupkaorum (Knull) 58’. Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view, about 4 times as long as wide (Fig. 58d). Pygofer ap pendage not curved upward in lateral view (Fig. 58a). ................................................... 59 59(58). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad in lateral view (Fig. 58d). Pygofer appendage straight in dorsal view (Fig. 58b). .................................................................. 58. E. usitata (Beamer) 59’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 59d). Pygofer appendage distinctly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 59b). .................................................................................................... 60 60(59). Pygofer appendage sinuate twice, extended well beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 59a, b). Third point of style apex about as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 59c). Smaller (2.6–2.8 mm). ............................................................................ 59. E. incondita (Beamer) 60’. Pygofer appendage sinuate once, only slightly extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 60a, b). Third point of style apex considerably longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 60c). Larger (3–3.2 mm). .................................................... 60. E. ingrata (Beamer) 61(54). Third point of style apex longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 61c). Ae- deagal shaft with large lateral lobes at base; tip of shaft abruptly bent dorsad (Fig. 61d, e). Smaller (2.4–2.8 mm). ....................................................................................... 62 61’. Third point of style apex shorter than half distance between other two points (Fig. 63c). Ae- deagal shaft with or without narrow lateral lobes at base; tip of shaft not bent dorsad (Fig. 63d, e). Larger (2.8–3.3 mm). ......................................................................................... 63 62(61). Aedeagal shaft with dorsal carina; shaft narrowing towards apex in lateral view; lateral lobes narrowing towards shaft apex, widest at base (Fig. 61d, e). ...................................... ........................................................................................ 61. E. arenosa (Ross & DeLong) 62’. Aedeagal shaft without dorsal carina; shaft parallel sided in lateral view; lateral lobes rounded, widest at middle (Fig. 62d, e). .................................................. 62. E. uncinata (Beamer) 63(61). Forewing with 3 narrow red crossbands (Plate 4v). ........................... 63. E. arpegia (Ross) 63’. Forewing with usual maculate color pattern (Plate 4w). ........................................................ 64 64(63). Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view, distinctly compressed; gonoduct well separated from dorsal margin of shaft at least distally (Fig. 64d, e). ....................................................... 65 64’. Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view; gonoduct close to dorsal margin of shaft throughout its length (Fig. 66d, e). ......................................................................................................... 66 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 89 65(64). Aedeagal shaft with straight dorsal and ventral margins; gonoduct distant from dorsal margin throughout length of shaft (Fig. 64d). .............................. 64. E. propria (Beamer) 65’. Aedeagal shaft with slightly bent dorsal and ventral margins; gonoduct distant from dorsal margin only in distal half of shaft (Fig. 65d). ............................. 65. E. brevipes (Beamer) 66(64). Aedeagal shaft distinctly curved dorsad; dorsal apodeme rounded distally in dorsal view (Fig. 66d, e). ................................................................................. 66. E. turgida (Beamer) 66’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view or slightly curved ventrad; dorsal apodeme truncate distally in dorsal view (Fig. 67d, e). ............................................................................... 67 67(66). Pygofer appendage swollen in distal half (Fig. 67a). .......... 67. E. delongi (Knull & Auten) 67’. Pygofer appendage swollen in distal two thirds (Fig. 68a). ................................................... 68 68(67). Pygofer appendage not denticulate, more than twice as wide at middle as at base; its dorsal margin straight (Fig. 68a). ............................................................ 68. E. immota (Beamer) 68’. Pygofer appendage denticulate distally, less than twice as wide at middle as at base; its dorsal margin sinuate (Fig. 70a). ............................................................................................... 69 69(68). Pygofer appendage extended beyond pygofer apex, directed caudad (Fig. 69a). .................. ....................................................................................................... 69. E. tantilla (Beamer) 69’. Pygofer appendage not extended beyond pygofer apex, directed ventrocaudad (Fig. 70a). ....... .......................................................................................................... 70. E. sorota (Hepner) 70(53). Pygofer appendage not extended to pygofer apex (Fig. 73a). ........................................... 71 70’. Pygofer appendage extended to or beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 92a). ..................................... 91 71(70). Third point of style apex longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 71c, 73c). ..................................................................................................................................72 71’. Third point of style apex not longer than half distance between other two points (Fig. 81c). .... ...........................................................................................................................................81 72(71). Third point of style apex with broad base, triangular in shape (Fig. 71c, 72c). ................ 73 72’. Third point of style apex narrow throughout its length (Fig. 73c). ........................................ 74 73(72). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus extended posterad to midlength of aedeagal shaft in lateral view (Fig. 71d). ............................................................................... 71. E. solita (Beamer) 73’. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus not extended beyond base of aedeagal shaft in lateral view (Fig. 72d). .................................................................................................. 72. E. knullae (Ross) 74(72). Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view and strongly compressed, more than twice as broad in lateral view as in ventral view (Fig. 73d, e). Smaller (2.5–2.7 mm). .................................. ..........................................................................................................73. E. omani (Beamer) 74’. Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view, at most slightly compressed, less than twice as broad in lateral view as in ventral view (Fig. 79d, e). Larger (2.7–3.2 mm). ............................... 75 75(74). Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft widest near midlength of shaft (Fig. 74e, 75e). ............... 76 75’. Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft, if present, widest at base of shaft (Fig. 76e). ....................... 77 76(75). Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view, forming right angle with preatrium (Fig. 74d). Third point of style apex curved (Fig. 74c). ...................................... 74. E. mimica (Ross) 76’. Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad, forming continuous curve with preatrium (Fig. 75d). Third point of style apex straight (Fig. 75c). ........................................... 75. E. sancta (Beamer) Vol. 39 Art.390 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 77(75). Third point of style apex shorter than distance between other two points (Fig. 76c). ........... .......................................................................................................... 76. E. inksana (Knull) 77’. Third point of style apex longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 77c). ............ 78 78(77). Pygofer appendage attenuate, about 10 times as long as wide in lateral view, extended towards ventrocaudal margin of pygofer lobe (Fig. 77a). ............. 77. E. alloplana (Ross) 78’. Pygofer appendage robust, about 5 times as long as wide in lateral view, extended towards caudal margin of pygofer lobe (Fig. 78a). ....................................................................... 79 79(78). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad (Fig. 78d). Pygofer appendage curved upward and inward in distal half (Fig. 78a). ....................................................................... 78. E. parva (Beamer) 79’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 79d). Pygofer appendage straight in distal half (Fig. 79a). ........................................................................................................................ 80 80(79). Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 45°, margin between first and second points convex, first point prominent (Fig. 79c). .............. 79. E. mirifica (Beamer) 80’. Angle between basal and third points of style apex almost 90°, margin between first and sec- ond points concave, first point small (Fig. 80c). .......................... 80. E. abjecta (Beamer) 81(71). Tip of aedeagus depressed, abruptly bent dorsad; aedeagal shaft not denticulate (Fig. 81d). Forewing largely red (Plate 5a). ...................................................... 81. E. hartii (Gillette) 81’. Tip of aedeagus not as above. Forewing with usual maculate pattern (Plate 5r). .................. 82 82(81). Aedeagal shaft short and broad in lateral view (less than twice as long as wide); preatrium longer than shaft (Fig. 82d, 83d). .................................................................................... 83 82’. Aedeagal shaft longer and more slender (more than twice as long as wide); preatrium as long as or shorter than shaft (Fig. 84d, 85d). ........................................................................... 84 83(82). Aedeagal shaft depressed (Fig. 82d, e). Pygofer appendage curved downward (Fig. 82a). Smaller (2.5–2.6 mm). Mesonotum apex reddish (Plate 5r). ........ 82. E. misera (Beamer) 83’. Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 83d, e). Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view (Fig. 83a). Larger (2.6–2.8 mm). Mesonotum apex blackish (Plate 5s). ...................................... .................................................................................................. 83. E. nevadensis (Beamer) 84(82). Aedeagal shaft expanded towards apex in ventral view (Fig. 84d, e). ................................... .............................................................................................................. 84. E. lata (Beamer) 84’. Aedeagal shaft not expanded towards apex in ventral view (Fig. 85d, e). ............................. 85 85(84). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad (Fig. 85d, 86d). ................................................................. 86 85’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view or slightly curved ventrad (Fig. 88d, 89d). ............... 88 86(85). Third point of style apex short, toothlike (Fig. 85c). Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view, with large lateral lobes extended to gonopore (Fig. 85d, e). .......... 85. E. levecki (Hepner) 86’. Third point of style apex at least 3 times as long as wide (Fig. 87c). Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view, with small lateral lobes not extended to gonopore (Fig. 87d, e). ................ 87 87(86). Angle between basal and third points of style more than 90° (Fig. 86c). Aedeagal shaft not denticulate, lateral lobes widest at middle of shaft (Fig. 86e). ......... 86. E. tantula (Knull) 87’. Angle between basal and third points of style about 90° (Fig. 87c). Aedeagal shaft denticulate, lateral lobes widest at base of shaft (Fig. 87e). ................................. 87. E. beeri (Hepner) 88(85). Third point of style apex evenly curved, about half as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 88c). Pygofer appendage only 1.5 times as long as basal projection (Fig. 88a). .................................................................................................... 88. E. accita (Knull) 88’. Third point of style apex straight, less than half as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 89c). Pygofer appendage at least twice as long as basal projection (Fig. 89a). ...... 89 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 91 89(88). Pygofer appendage evenly curved downward and outward, not compressed (Fig. 89a, b). ............................................................................................................. 89. E. cera (Hepner) 89’. Pygofer appendage straight or slightly sinuate in lateral view, straight in dorsal view, com- pressed (Fig. 91a, b). ....................................................................................................... 90 90(89). Tip of aedeagal shaft curved ventrad; lateral lobes extended beyond midlength of shaft (Fig. 90d, e). Forewing usually with narrow reddish crossband at middle of clavus (Plate 6d). ............................................................................................. 90. E. rubraza (Robinson) 90’. Aedeagal shaft more or less straight; lateral lobes not extended to midlength of shaft (Fig. 91d, e). Forewing without reddish crossband, basal half sometimes darkened (Plate 6e). .. ............................................................................................................. 91. E. affinis (Fitch) 91(70). Third point of style apex very short, toothlike, about as long as wide, or shorter (Fig. 93c). .......................................................................................................................................... 92 91’. Third point of style apex at least twice as long as wide at base (Fig. 121c, 170c). ............. 118 92(91). Aedeagal shaft distinctly curved dorsad (Fig. 92d, 93d). .................................................. 93 92’. Aedeagal shaft straight or slightly curved ventrad (Fig. 95d, 96d). ....................................... 95 93(92). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection, slender in lateral view, with small lateral lobes (Fig. 92d, e). Coloration whitish with reduced maculate color pattern (Plate 6f). ............... ................................................................................................ 92. E. stephensoni (Beamer) 93’. Aedeagal shaft compressed, broad in lateral view, without lateral lobes (Fig. 93d, e). Color- ation yellowish with usual maculate color pattern (Plate 6g). ......................................... 94 94(93). Pygofer appendage curved downward in lateral view, straight in dorsal view (Fig. 93a, b). Larger (3.1–3.3 mm). ................................................................... 93. E. clavipes (Beamer) 94’. Pygofer appendage curved upward in lateral view, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 94a, b). Smaller (2.6–2.8 mm). ...................................................... 94. E. retusa (Beamer) 95(92). Pygofer appendage strongly curved inward, apex crossing midline (Fig. 95b). ............... 96 95’. Pygofer appendages, at most slightly curved inward, apex not crossing midline (Fig. 97b). ..... .......................................................................................................................................... 97 96(95). Portion of pygofer appendage distad of bend about twice as long as basal portion, tip sinu- ate (Fig. 95b). .............................................................................. 95. E. hymac (Robinson) 96’. Portion of pygofer appendage distad of bend about as long as basal portion, tip straight (Fig. 96b). ............................................................................................. 96. E. externa (Beamer) 97(95). Aedeagus with large denticulate lateral lobes at base, close to dorsal margin of aedeagus (Fig. 97d, e). ................................................................................... 97. E. brooki (Hepner) 97’. Aedeagus without denticulate lateral lobes (Fig. 100d, e). ..................................................... 98 98(97). Pygofer appendage extended well beyond pygofer apex (usually > 5 times appendage width) (Fig. 100a, b). ...................................................................................................... 99 98’. Pygofer appendage only slightly, if any, extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 110a, b). ..... 109 99(98). Pygofer appendage straight in dorsal and lateral view (Fig. 98a, b). ... 98. E. longa (Knull) 99’. Pygofer appendage sinuate in dorsal and/or lateral view (Fig. 101a, b). ............................. 100 100(99). Pygofer appendage helical, curved in three dimensions (Fig. 99a, b). ................................. ................................................................................................ 99. E. sebringensis (Hepner) 100’. Pygofer appendage not helical, sinuate in one plane (Fig. 100a, b). .................................. 101 101(100). Third point of style apex not developed (Fig. 100c, 101c). ........................................ 102 101’. Third point of style apex prominent (Fig. 102c). ................................................................ 103 Vol. 39 Art.392 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 102(101). Pygofer appendage straight in dorsal view (Fig. 100b). ........ 100. E. parvipes (Beamer) 102’. Pygofer appendage strongly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 101b). .............................................. ................................................................................................ 101. E. calamitosa (Beamer) 103(101). Pygofer appendage curved downward or straight in lateral view, only slightly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 102a, b). ............................................................................................ 104 103’. Pygofer appendage in distal half curved upward in lateral view, usually strongly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 104a, b). ............................................................................................ 105 104(103). Pygofer appendage abruptly bent twice (near base and near tip) in dorsal view (Fig. 102b). Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 102 d, e). ...................... 102. E. richardsi (Ross) 104’. Pygofer appendage evenly curved in dorsal view (Fig. 103b). Aedeagal shaft round in cros- section (Fig. 103d, e). ........................................................... 103. E. marilandicae (Ross) 105(103). Pygofer lobe with rounded apex (Fig. 104a). Vertex midline usually red (Plate 7a). ........ ................................................................................................... 104. E. opulenta (Beamer) 105’. Pygofer dorsal lobe with angulate apex (Fig. 105a). Vertex midline usually yellowish (Plate 7d). ...................................................................................................................... 106 106(105). Aedeagus narrow in dorsal view, with small lateral lobes at base (Fig. 105e). Forewing usually with red crossband (Plate 7b). ............................................. 105. E. era (McAtee) 106’. Aedeagus more broad in dorsal view, without lateral lobes, or with lobes extended along entire length of shaft (Fig. 106e). Forewing without crossband (Plate 7c). .................. 107 107(106). Aedeagal shaft with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft; preatrium longer than shaft (Fig. 106d, e). ................................................................ 106. E. fergersoni (Hepner) 107’. Aedeagal shaft without lateral lobes; preatrium about as long as shaft (Fig. 107d, e). ...... 108 108(107). Aedeagal shaft slightly compressed distally; gonoduct divergent from dorsal margin in distal half of shaft (Fig. 107d, e). Smaller (2.7–2.9 mm). .............. 107. E. ellisi (Hepner) 108’. Aedeagal shaft round in crossection; gonoduct parallel to dorsal margin of shaft (Fig. 108d, e). Larger (2.9–3.2 mm). ................................... 108. E. acantha (Ross & DeLong) 109(98). Pygofer appendage distinctly curved downward at angle of about 45° or more from hori- zontal (Fig. 109a). ......................................................................................................... 110 109’. Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view, or only slightly curved downward (Fig. 113a). .... ......................................................................................................................................... 113 110(109). Pygofer lobe with rounded apex; appendage curved downward at angle of about 90° (Fig. 109a). ................................................................................. 109. E. interna (Beamer) 110’. Pygofer lobe with angulate apex; appendage curved downward at angle of about 45° (Fig. 110a). .............................................................................................................................. 111 111(110). Pygofer appendage slightly extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 111a). Aedeagal shaft slender, without lateral lobes (Fig. 111e). Larger (2.9–3.1 mm). .................................. 112 111’. Pygofer appendage not extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 110a). Aedeagal shaft broader, with lateral lobes at base (Fig. 110e). Smaller (2.6–2.7 mm). ...... 110. E. robusta (Knull) 112(111). Pygofer appendage abruptly curved downward at middle of its length (Fig. 111a). Ae- deagal shaft shorter than preatrium (Fig. 111d). ............................ 111. E. metopia (Ross) 112’. Pygofer appendage evenly curved downward throughout its length (Fig. 112a). Aedeagal shaft about as long as preatrium (Fig. 112d). .................. 112. E. patris (Ross & DeLong) Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 93 113(109). Pygofer appendage depressed in basal half, twisted at middle, and compressed distally, straight in dorsal and lateral view (Fig. 113a). ................................. 113. E. econa (Ross) 113’. Pygofer appendage, if straight, not twisted (Fig. 114a). ..................................................... 114 114(113). Pygofer appendage slightly curved downward in lateral view (Fig. 114a). Forewing with three narrow red crossbands (Plate 7k). ............................................. 114. E. alicia (Ross) 114’. Pygofer appendage straight or slightly curved upward in lateral view (Fig. 116a). Forewing with usual maculate color pattern (Plate 7m). .............................................................. 115 115(114). Pygofer appendage straight (Fig. 115a, b). Forewing with oblique vittae forming con- tinuous zigzag pattern (Plate 7l). .................................................... 115. E. zioni (Beamer) 115’. Pygofer appendage distinctly sinuate (Fig. 117a, b). Forewing with broken oblique vittae (Plate 7m). ..................................................................................................................... 116 116(115). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection (Fig. 116d, e). Smaller (2.6–2.7 mm). ...................... ........................................................................................................ 116. E. greeni (Hepner) 116’. Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 117d, e, 118d, e). Larger (2.8–3.1 mm). ........................ 117 117(116). Aedeagal shaft with large lateral lobes at base, slightly curved dorsad (Fig. 117d, e). ...... .......................................................................................................... 117. E. lenta (Beamer) 117’. Aedeagal shaft without lateral lobes, straight in lateral view (Fig. 118d, e). ............................. ......................................................................................................... 118. E. gilesi (Hepner) 118(91). Third point of style apex about as long as or longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 121c, 143c). ................................................................................................ 119 118’. Third point of style apex shorter than distance between other two points (Fig. 163c). ...... 162 119(118). Aedeagal shaft distinctly compressed (Fig. 120d, e). .................................................. 120 119’. Aedeagal shaft round in crossection or depressed (Fig. 127d, e). ...................................... 125 120(119). Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view (more than 3 times as long as wide) (Fig. 119d). Pygofer appendage extended to pygofer apex (Fig. 119a, b). ....................................... 121 120’. Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view (less than 3 times as long as wide) (Fig. 121d). Pygofer appendage extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 121a, b). ........................................... 122 121(120). Third point of style apex about as long as distance between other two points, broad at base; angle between basal and third points of style about 90° (Fig. 119c). ......................... ............................................................................................................ 119. E. maga (Knull) 121’. Third point of style apex much longer than distance between other two points, narrow throughout its length; angle between basal and third points of style less than 90° (Fig. 120c). ............................................................................... 120. E. igella (Ross & DeLong) 122(120). Aedeagal shaft without lateral lobes, apex truncate in ventral view (Fig. 121e). Margin between first and second points of style apex convex (Fig. 121c). ...................................... .................................................................................................. 121. E. stannardi (Hepner) 122’. Aedeagal shaft with lateral lobes, its apex acuminate in ventral view (Fig. 122e). Margin between first and second points of style apex straight or concave (Fig. 122c). ............ 123 123(122). Apex of pygofer appendage strongly recurved in lateral view, distinctly denticulate (Fig. 122a). ..................................................................................... 122. E. trautmanae (Knull) 123’. Apex of pygofer appendage not recurved or only slightly recurved in lateral view (Fig. 123a). ............................................................................................................................ 124 Vol. 39 Art.394 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 124(123). Apex of pygofer appendage curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 55b). Gonoduct sepa- rated from dorsal margin of aedeagal shaft by more than half shaft width (Fig. 55d). ....... ...................................................................................................... 55. E. rotunda (Beamer) 124’. Apex of pygofer appendage curved inward in dorsal view (Fig. 123b). Gonoduct separated from dorsal margin of aedeagal shaft by less than half shaft width (Fig. 123d). .................. ..................................................................................................... 123. E. knighti (Beamer) 125(119). Aedeagal shaft short and broad, not more that 1.5 times longer than wide in ventral view (Fig. 126e). .................................................................................................................... 126 125’. Aedeagal shaft longer, more than 1.5 times longer than wide in ventral view (Fig. 137e). ...... .........................................................................................................................................139 126(125). Third point of style apex with broad base, triangular (Fig. 124c). Aedeagal shaft round in ventral view (Fig. 124e). ...................................................... 124. E. triangulata (Beamer) 126’. Third point of style apex narrow throughout its length (Fig. 125c). .................................. 127 127(126). Tip of aedeagal shaft abruptly bent dorsad at right angle and expanded (Fig. 125d, e). Forewing with large reddish patch (Plate 7v). ....................... 125. E. corylorubra (Knull) 127’. Tip of aedeagal shaft not bent dorsad, usually not expanded (Fig. 126d, e). ..................... 128 128(127). Denticulate part of aedeagal shaft triangular in dorsal view, narrowing towards apex (Fig. 126e). Forewing usually with large red patches (Plate 8a, b). ............................. 129 128’. Denticulate part of aedeagal shaft parallel sided or rounded in dorsal view (Fig. 128e). Fore- wing with usual maculate pattern (Plate 8f). ................................................................ 130 129(128). Pygofer appendage curved downward (Fig. 126a, b). Forewing with single red patch (Plate 8a). ...................................................................................... 126. E. fulleri (Hepner) 129’. Pygofer appendage curved inward (Fig. 127a, b). Forewing with two red patches (Plate 8b). ............................................................................................. 127. E. rubranotata (Beamer) 130(128). Ventral margin of aedeagal shaft forming continuous line with preatrium (Fig. 128d). Pygofer appendage distinctly curved inward (Fig. 128b). ............................................ 131 130’. Ventral margin of aedeagal shaft forming obtuse angle with preatrium (Fig. 130d, 132d). Pygofer appendage straight or only slightly curved in dorsal view (Fig. 132b). .......... 132 131(130). Aedeagal shaft slender in lateral view, strongly expanded in ventral view, more than 2 times as broad as phallobase (Fig. 128d, e). Pygofer appendage evenly curved throughout its length (Fig. 128b). ....................................................................... 128. E. citrosa (Ross) 131’. Aedeagal shaft broad in lateral view, only slightly expanded in ventral view, only slightly broader than phallobase (Fig. 129d, e). Pygofer appendages curved in distal third only (Fig. 129b). ..................................................................................... 129. E. clara (Beamer) 132(130). Pygofer appendage extended well beyond pygofer apex (at least 5 times of appendage width) (Fig. 130a). ........................................................................... 130. E. nimia (Knull) 132’. Pygofer appendage extended only slightly, if any, beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 131a). ....... 133 133(132). Third point of style apex about as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 131c). Aedeagal shaft parallel sided in ventral view, round in crossection (Fig. 131d, e). ............. ...................................................................................................... 131. E. flexibilis (Knull) 133’. Third point of style apex considerably longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 132c). Aedeagal shaft swollen in ventral view, usually depressed (Fig. 132d, e). ........ 134 134(133). Pygofer appendage slightly sinuate in distal third (Fig. 132a, 133a). ......................... 135 134’. Pygofer appendage not sinuate in distal third (Fig. 134a). ................................................. 136 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 95 135(134). Third point of style apex more than 1.5 times as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 132c). Aedeagus without ventral hump (Fig. 132d). .. 132. E. certa (Beamer) 135’. Third point of style apex less than 1.5 times as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 133c). Aedeagus with ventral hump (Fig. 133d). .................. 133. E. direpta (Knull) 136(134). Preatrium longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 135d). Smaller (2.4–2.7 mm). ................. 137 136’. Preatrium about as long as aedeagal shaft (Fig. 136d). Larger (2.8–3.4 mm). ................... 138 137(136). Pygofer appendage curved downward; pygofer lobe with angulate apex (Fig. 134a, b). ............................................................................................................ 134. E. tersa (Knull) 137’. Pygofer appendage slightly curved inward, straight in lateral view; pygofer lobe with rounded apex (Fig. 1a, b). ..................................................................... 1. E. dira (Beamer) 138(136). Pygofer appendage curved downward (Fig. 135a). Aedeagal shaft with ventral hump (Fig. 135d). Larger (3.2–3.4 mm). ............................................. 135. E. luculenta (Knull) 138’. Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view, only slightly curved at tip (Fig. 136a). Aedeagal shaft without ventral hump (Fig. 136d). Smaller (2.8–3.2 mm). ..... 136. E. fausta (Knull) 139(125). Aedeagal shaft with large usually denticulate lateral lobes reaching apex of shaft (Fig. 138e). ...............................................................................................................................140 139’. Lateral lobes on aedeagal shaft, if present, not denticulate and not reaching apex of shaft (Fig. 147e). .................................................................................................................... 148 140(139). Pygofer appendage compressed, apex curved downward (Fig. 137a, 138a). ............. 141 140’. Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view (Fig. 140a). ..................................................... 143 141(140). Pygofer appendage sinuate in dorsal view, strongly denticulate (Fig. 137b). Clavus mostly red (Plate 8l). ...................................................................... 137. E. bella (McAtee) 141’. Pygofer appendage straight in dorsal view, if denticulate, only along ventral margin (Fig. 138b). Clavus with usual maculate pattern (Plate 8m). ................................................ 142 142(141). Pygofer appendage denticulate along ventral margin (Fig. 138a). Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 138d). Smaller (2.5–2.8 mm). ........... 138. E. coxi (Ross & DeLong) 142’. Pygofer appendage not denticulate (Fig. 139a). Aedeagal shaft slightly curved dorsad (Fig. 139d). Larger (2.9–3.1 mm). ............................................ 139. E. torella (Robinson) 143(140). Preatrium shorter than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 140d). Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 45° (Fig. 140c). .............................................. 140. E. tumida (Knull) 143’. Preatrium as long or longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 141d). Angle between basal and third points of style apex almost 90° (Fig. 141c). ................................................................. 144 144(143). Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft without small teeth (Fig. 141e). Smaller (2.3 mm). ......... ........................................................................................................... 141. E. glicilla (Ross) 144’. Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft with small teeth (Fig. 142e). Larger (2.9–3.4 mm). ......... 145 145(144). Pygofer appendage compressed (Fig. 142a, b). Hind margin of mesonotum dark brown. Forewing with brown crossband at apex of clavus (Plate 8q). ............................................ .................................................................................................. 142. E. morgani (DeLong) 145’. Pygofer appendage not compressed (Fig. 144a, b). Hind margin of mesonotum pale (Plate 8r). .......................................................................................................................146 146(145). Pygofer appendage sinuate basally, straight in distal half (Fig. 143b). Third point of style apex not longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 143c). .......................... ............................................................................................................ 143. E. arta (Beamer) 146’. Pygofer appendage straight basally, slightly curved inward in distal half (Fig. 144b). Third point of style apex longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 144c). ........... 147 Vol. 39 Art.396 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 147(146). Aedeagal shaft with lateral lobes widest at base of shaft (Fig. 144e). Mesonotum with dark brown apex. Forewing with brownish crossband (Plate 8s). ....................................... .................................................................................................... 144. E. hymettana (Knull) 147’. Aedeagal shaft with lateral lobes widest at middle of shaft (Fig. 145e). Mesonotum with red- dish apex. Forewing with usual maculate pattern (Plate 9a). . 145. E. lawsoni (Robinson) 148(139). Pygofer appendage distinctly curved downward at angle of about 45° or more from horizontal (Fig. 146a). ................................................. 146. E. continua (Knull & Auten) 148’. Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view, or only slightly curved downward (Fig. 147a). ........................................................................................................................................ 149 149(148). Preatrium distinctly shorter than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 147d, 148d). ........................... 150 149’. Preatrium as long as or longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 153d). ........................................ 155 150(149). Pygofer appendage distinctly sinuate (Fig. 147b). ....................... 147. E. valida (Knull) 150’. Pygofer appendage straight or slightly evenly curved (Fig. 149b). ................................... 151 151(150). Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 90° (Fig. 148c). Dorsal apo- deme of aedeagus less than half as long as shaft (Fig. 148d). .. 148. E. pamelae (Hepner) 151’. Angle between basal and third points of style apex less than 90° (Fig. 151c). Dorsal apo- deme of aedeagus more than half as long as shaft (Fig. 151d). .................................... 152 152(151). Angle between basal and third points of style apex less than 45° (Fig. 149c). Aedeagal shaft strongly curved dorsad (Fig. 149d). ..................................... 149. E. protuma (Ross) 152’. Angle between basal and third points of style apex more than 45° (Fig. 151c). Aedeagal shaft straight or only slightly curved dorsad (Fig. 151d). ............................................ 153 153(152). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection, dorsal margin sinuate near apex in lateral view, with distinct lateral lobes near base (Fig. 150d, e). ..... 150. E. havana (Ross & DeLong) 153’. Aedeagal shaft depressed, dorsal margin straight or evenly curved ventrad near apex in lateral view, parallel sided in dorsal view (Fig. 151d, e). ............................................. 154 154(153). Pygofer appendage strongly extended beyond pygofer apex (at least 5 times of append- age width) (Fig. 151a). Tip of aedeagal shaft curved ventrad (Fig. 151d). Larger (3–3.2 mm). ............................................................................................. 151. E. gemoides (Ross) 154’. Pygofer appendage not or only slightly extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 152a). Tip of aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 152d). Smaller (2.7–3 mm). ........................... ..................................................................................................... 152. E. gemina (McAtee) 155(149). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus not extended posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view (Fig. 153d, 154d). ......................................................................................................... 156 155’. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus extended posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view (Fig. 155d). .............................................................................................................................157 156(155). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection, straight in lateral view; dorsal apodeme expanded laterad (Fig. 153d, e). ................................................................... 153. E. malaca (Knull) 156’. Aedeagal shaft depressed, curved dorsad; dorsal apodeme not expanded laterad (Fig. 154d, e). ....................................................................................154. E. penesica (Beamer) 157(155). Aedeagal shaft depressed, without lateral lobes (Fig. 155d, e, 156d, e). .................... 158 157’. Aedeagal shaft round in crossection or compressed, with lateral lobes at base (Fig. 157d, e). .........................................................................................................................................159 158(157). Aedeagal shaft oval in ventral view, largely denticulate (Fig. 155e). Forewing with large reddish maculae (Plate 9k). .................................................... 155. E. parallela (McAtee) 158’. Aedeagal shaft parallel sided in ventral view, denticulate only at apex (Fig. 156e). Forewing with small reddish maculae (Plate 9l). ......................................... 156. E. severini (Knull) Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 97 159(157). Third point of style apex more than 1.5 times as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 157c). Aedeagal shaft slightly curved dorsad, with pointed apex in lateral view (Fig. 157d). ...................................................................... 157. E. claroides (Hepner) 159’. Third point of style apex less than 1.5 times as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 158c). Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view, with apex usually curved ventrad and truncate (Fig. 158d). ...................................................................................................... 160 160(159). Pygofer appendage slightly curved upward and denticulate distally (Fig. 158a). Mesono- tum with dark brown lateral triangles and apex. Forewing with fuscous crossband (Plate 9n). ................................................................................................ 158. E. lunata (McAtee) 160’. Pygofer appendage straight or curved downward, not denticulate (Fig. 160a). Mesonotum with reddish lateral triangles and apex. Forewing with usual maculate color patter (Plate 9o). ................................................................................................................................. 161 161(160). Aedeagal shaft narrowing towards apex in lateral view, slender (Fig. 159d). Third point of style apex longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 159c). ........................... .....................................................................................................159. E. adunca (Beamer) 161’. Aedeagal shaft parallel sided in lateral view, stout (Fig. 160d). Third point of style apex not longer than distance between other two points (Fig. 160c). ........... 160. E. curta (Beamer) 162(118). Aedeagal shaft strongly curved dorsad (> 45°) (Fig. 161d, 162d). ............................. 163 162’. Aedeagal shaft straight or only slightly curved in lateral view (Fig. 164d, 165d). ............ 165 163(162). Aedeagal shaft evenly curved in distal half, with large lateral lobes, without dorsal carina (Fig. 161d, e). .................................................................. 161. E. ballista (Beamer) 163’. Aedeagal shaft curved in basal half, straight in distal half, without lateral lobes, with large dorsal carina (Fig. 162d, e). .......................................................................................... 164 164(163). Pygofer appendage strongly sinuate (Fig. 162a, b). Third point of style curved (Fig. 162c). .......................................................................................... 162. E. rostrata (Beamer) 164’. Pygofer appendage straight (Fig. 163a, b). Third point of style straight (Fig. 163c). ............... ............................................................................................. 163. E. penerostrata (Beamer) 165(162). Third point of style apex not longer than 1/3 distance between other two points (Fig. 164c, 168c). .................................................................................................................... 166 165’. Third point of style apex longer than 1/3 distance between other two points (Fig. 179c, 181c). ..............................................................................................................................181 166(165). Pygofer appendage straight or slightly curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 166b). .. 167 166’. Pygofer appendage distinctly sinuate or curved inward in dorsal view (Fig. 171b). ......... 171 167(166). Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad (Fig. 164d). .................. 164. E. emquu (Ross & DeLong) 167’. Aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view or curved ventrad (Fig. 165d). .............................. 168 168(167). Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 165d, e). Forewing with 3 narrow crossbands (Plate 9u). ......................................................................................... 165. E. trivittata (Robinson) 168’. Aedeagal shaft round in crossection (Fig. 166d, e). Forewing without crossbands or with single crossband not reaching lateral margin of wing (Plate 10a). ............................... 169 169(168). Pygofer appendage strongly extended beyond pygofer apex (at least 5 times of append- age width) (Fig. 166a). Preatrium about as long as aedeagal shaft; dorsal apodeme short (Fig. 166d). .................................................................................... 166. E. anseri (Hepner) 169’. Pygofer appendage only slightly, if any, extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 167a, 168a). Preatrium longer than aedeagal shaft; dorsal apodeme long (Fig. 167d). .................... 170 Vol. 39 Art.398 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 170(169). Apex of aedeagal shaft curved ventrad (Fig. 167d). Third point of style apex not longer than 1/4 distance between other two points (Fig. 167c). Clavus often with red spot (Plate 10a). ................................................................................ 167. E. stoveri (Ross & DeLong) 170’. Apex of aedeagal shaft straight in lateral view (Fig. 168d). Third point of style 1/3 or more as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 168c). Forewing with usual maculate pattern (Plate 10b). ................................................................ 168. E. campora (Robinson) 171(166). Aedeagal shaft depressed, broadened distally in ventral view (Fig. 169d, e). ................... ................................................................................................... 169. E. spinifera (Beamer) 171’. Aedeagal shaft not depressed, parallel sided or narrowing towards apex in ventral view (Fig. 171d, e). ................................................................................................................ 172 172(171). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus not extended posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view, strongly extended laterad, rounded distally in dorsal view; shaft with denticulate lateral lobes (Fig. 170d, e). .................................................. 170. E. comoides (Ross & DeLong) 172’. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus extended well posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view. Lateral lobes of aedeagus, if present, not denticulate (Fig. 172d, e). ........................... 173 173(172). Second point of style apex long and slender, about as long as third (Fig. 171c). Fore- wing with red zigzag pattern (Plate 10d). Aedeagal shaft distinctly curved dorsad (Fig. 171d). ....................................................................................171. E. confirmata (McAtee) 173’. Second point of style apex shorter than third (Fig. 172c). Forewing with crossband or usual maculate pattern (Plate 10h, i). ..................................................................................... 174 174(173). Pygofer appendage strongly extended beyond pygofer apex (at least 5 times of append- age width) (Fig. 172a). .................................................................................................. 175 174’. Pygofer appendage only slightly, if any, extended beyond pygofer apex (Fig. 174a). ....... 177 175(174). Aedeagal shaft distinctly compressed, broad in lateral view, without lateral lobes, den- ticulate throughout entire length (Fig. 172d, e). ........... 172. E. phellos (Ross & DeLong) 175’. Aedeagal shaft round in crossection or only slightly compressed, slender in lateral view, usu- ally with small lateral lobes, denticulate in distal half only (Fig. 173d, e). .................. 176 176(175). Pygofer appendage strongly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 105b). Forewing usually with red crossband (Plate 7b). .................................................................. 105. E. era (McAtee) 176’. Pygofer appendage only slightly sinuate in dorsal view (Fig. 173b). Forewing with usual maculate color pattern (Plate 10f). ......................................... 173. E. bigemina (McAtee) 177(174). Margin between first and second points of style apex convex (Fig. 174c). Aedeagal shaft compressed, slightly curved dorsad (Fig. 174d, e). Pygofer appendage sinuate near apex (Fig. 174a, b). ............................................................................... 174. E. mensa (Beamer) 177’. Margin between first and second points of style apex straight or concave (Fig. 175c). Aedea- gal shaft round in crossection, straight in lateral view (Fig. 175d,e). Pygofer appendage straight or evenly curved in distal half (Fig. 175a, b). .................................................. 178 178(177). Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 90° (Fig. 175c, 176c). Preat- rium not longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 175d). Forewing usually with crossband (Plate 10h, i). ........................................................................................................................... 179 178’. Angle between basal and third points of style apex less than 90° (Fig. 177c). Preatrium dis- tinctly longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 177d). Forewing with usual maculate color pat- tern (Plate 10j). ............................................................................................................. 180 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 99 179(178). Pygofer appendage compressed (Fig. 175a, b). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with trun- cate posterior margin (Fig. 175e). Forewing usually with brownish basal half (Plate 10h). .......................................................................................................... 175. E. basilaris (Say) 179’. Pygofer appendage round in crossection (Fig. 176a, b). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with prominent posterior margin (Fig. 176e). Forewing usually with narrow red crossband (Plate 10i). .............................................................................. 176. E. micheneri (Hepner) 180(178). Pygofer appendage round in crossection (Fig. 177a, b). Second point of style apex dis- tinctly enlarged (Fig. 177c). ......................................................... 177. E. lucyae (Hepner) 180’. Pygofer appendage compressed (Fig. 178a, b). Second point of style apex not enlarged (Fig. 178c). ............................................................................................ 178. E. guicei (Hepner) 181(165). Aedeagal shaft very broad in ventral view, about as wide as long (Fig. 179d, e). ............. .......................................................................................................... 179. E. lundi (Hepner) 181’. Aedeagal shaft slender, longer than wide (Fig. 181d, e). .................................................... 182 182(181). Tip of aedeagal shaft abruptly bent dorsad at sharp angle (Fig. 180d). ............................. ....................................................................................................... 180. E. marra (Beamer) 182’. Tip of aedeagal shaft not bent dorsad (Fig. 181d). ............................................................. 183 183(182). Preatrium only half as long as aedeagal shaft (Fig. 181d). Pygofer appendage straight in basal 2/3, apex abruptly curved inward at right angle (Fig. 181b). ..................................... ....................................................................................................... 181. E. staminea (Knull) 183’. Preatrium as long as or longer than aedeagal shaft (Fig. 182d). Pygofer appendage not as above. ............................................................................................................................ 184 184(183). Pygofer appendage strongly curved downward at almost right angle, compressed (Fig. 182a, b). Forewing usually with darkened basal half (Plate 10o). .... 182. E. unca (Knull) 184’. Pygofer appendage usually straight or only slightly curved downward (Fig. 184a, b). Fore- wing with different color pattern. ................................................................................. 185 185(184). Pygofer appendage strongly sinuate near apex; apex curved upward in lateral view (Fig. 183a, b). .................................................................................... 183. E. dumosa (Beamer) 185’. Pygofer appendage straight or evenly curved downward in lateral view (Fig. 185a). ....... 186 186(185). Margin between first and second points of style apex convex (Fig. 184c). Forewing with continuous zigzag pattern (Plate 10q). ......................................... 184. E. ligata (McAtee) 186’. Margin between first and second points of style apex straight or concave (Fig. 185c). Fore- wing with usual maculate color pattern or with crossbands (Plate 10r). ...................... 187 187(186). Aedeagal shaft with large lateral lobes reaching shaft apex (Fig. 185e, 186e). .......... 188 187’. Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft, if present, small, not reaching shaft apex (Fig. 188e). ..... 189 188(187). Pygofer appendage compressed, abruptly narrowing near middle in lateral view (Fig. 185a). Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft angulate (Fig. 185e). ............................................... ...................................................................................................185. E. contracta (Beamer) 188’. Pygofer appendage not compressed, evenly tapered towards apex (Fig. 186a). Lateral lobes of aedeagal shaft rounded (Fig. 186e). .............................. 186. E. vittata (Knull & Auten) 189(187). Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 45° (Fig. 187c). ....................... ...................................................................................................187. E. biramosa (Beamer) 189’. Angle between basal and third points of style apex about 90° (Fig. 188c). ....................... 190 Vol. 39 Art.3100 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 190(189). Pygofer appendage slightly curved outward in dorsal view (Fig. 168b, 188b). ......... 191 190’. Pygofer appendage straight or curved inward in dorsal view (Fig. 189b, 190b). .............. 192 191(190). Pygofer appendage abruptly curved down near middle length (Fig. 188a). Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 188d, e). ....................................................... 188. E. smithi (Ross) 191’. Pygofer appendage straight in lateral view (Fig. 168a). Aedeagal shaft round in crossection (Fig. 168d, e). ........................................................................ 168. E. campora (Robinson) 192(190). Pygofer appendage in dorsal view strongly sinuate basally, straight in distal half (Fig. 189b). Aedeagal shaft compressed (Fig. 189d, e). ......................... 189. E. prolixa (Knull) 192’. Pygofer appendage in dorsal view evenly curved or curved in distal half (Fig. 190b, 192b). Aedeagal shaft not compressed (Fig. 190d, e). ............................................................. 193 193(192). Pygofer appendage strongly curved inward in dorsal view, forming semicircle. Aede- agus in lateral view with dorsal apodeme extended more than half distance to apex of shaft (Fig. 190b). ............................................................................ 190. E. teres (Beamer) 193’. Pygofer appendage curved less strongly inward in dorsal view. Aedeagus in lateral view with dorsal apodeme extended less than half distance to apex of shaft (Fig. 191b). ............. 194 194(193). Second point of style apex well developed (Fig. 191c). Forewing with 3 narrow cross- bands (Plate 11f). ......................................................................... 191. E. amethica (Ross) 194’. Second point of style apex small toothlike (Fig. 192c). Forewing without crossbands (Plate 11h). .............................................................................................................................. 195 195(194). Pygofer appendage arising in basal third of dorsal margin of pygofer lobe (Fig. 194a). ... .........................................................................................................................................196 195’. Pygofer appendage arising at middle of dorsal margin of pygofer lobe (Fig. 196a2). ........ 198 196(195). Third point of style apex short and broad, only twice as long as basal width (Fig. 192c). Smaller (2.8–2.9 mm). ................................................................. 192. E. tenuitas (Knull) 196’. Third point of style apex longer, more than 3 times longer than basal width (Fig. 193c). Larger (3–3.3 mm). ....................................................................................................... 197 197(196). Preatrium longer than aedeagal shaft; shaft narrower than preatrium (Fig. 193d). Pygo- fer appendage almost straight in dorsal view (Fig. 193b). ...... 193. E. haysensis (Hepner) 197’. Preatrium about as long as aedeagal shaft; shaft about as wide as preatrium (Fig. 194d). Pygofer appendage distinctly sinuate (Fig. 194b). .................... 194. E. geronimoi (Knull) 198(195). Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus not extended posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view (only compressed anterior extension of dorsal apodeme extended) (Fig. 195d). Third point of style apex more than half as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 195c). ........................................................................................... 195. E. macra (Beamer) 198’. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus well extended posterad along aedeagal shaft in lateral view (Fig. 196d). Third point of style apex not more than half as long as distance between other two points (Fig. 196c). ......................................................................................... 199 199(198). Pygofer appendage slightly compressed basally, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, den- ticulate apically (Fig. 196a, b). Color pattern usual for genus (Plate 11k). ......................... ............................................................................................................. 196. E. socia (Knull) 199’. Pygofer appendage not compressed, straight in dorsal view, not denticulate (Fig. 197a, b). Vertex, pro-, and mesonotum usually with broad red stripe. Clavus with red spot at apex (Plate 11). ..................................................................................... 197. E. accola (McAtee) Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 101 1. Eratoneura dira (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 1, Plate 2a) Erythroneura dira Beamer, 1931d:286 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) dira Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura deklei Hepner, 1967a:20, syn.n. Erythroneura denmarki Hepner, 1967a:20, syn.n. Erythroneura siloamensis Hepner, 1967a:22, syn.n. Eratoneura dira Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.4–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple with additional small process at base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinu- ate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus parallel sided, connection to pygofer membranous; preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Dorsum yellow or white, with orange color pattern. Vertex with orange parallel submedial lines, with lateral branch; midline pale. Anteclypeus pale, concolorous with rest of face. Pronotum with Y- or V-shaped medial vitta. Mesonotum pale, with orange lateral triangles and apex. Thoracic venter entirely pale. Forewings with broken oblique vittae, without crossbands; cla- vus with separate basal and distal vittae; with dark spot near costal margin; inner apical cell with brown spot basally. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Ostrya virginiana, Corylus americana, Carpinus sp. Figure 1. E. dira (Beamer). a – pygofer lobe, lateral view; b – same, dorsal view; c – style; d – aedeagus, lateral view; e – same, ventral view; f – genital plate, ventral view; g – connective; h – forewing; i – hind wing; j – sternal abdominal apodemes (2S apodemes). Abbreviations: ac1– ac4 – apical cells; bl – basolateral macrochaetae; bm – brochosome field; cl – clavus; da – dorsal apodeme; dap – appendage; gd – gonoduct; ir – interradial crossvein; ms – basal macrosetae; pa – preatrium; pl – preapical lobe. Vol. 39 Art.3102 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 2. Eratoneura gillettei (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 2, Plate 2b) Erythroneura gillettei Beamer, 1931a:128 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) gillettei Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura gillettei Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dor- sal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, smooth, with small dorsal distal lobe; apex broadened in ventral view; basal processes arising near midlength of shaft and evenly divergent, distal processes long, apical, slender. Coloration usual for genus; vertex and pronotum with median stripe. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Wabash Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Unknown. Notes: The holotype was collected on 31 III 1929, not on 30 III 1929 as stated in the original publication. 3. Eratoneura imbricariae (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 3, Plate 2c) Erythroneura imbricariae Ross & DeLong, 1953a:86 Eratoneura imbricariae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Dorsal apo- deme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth; apex acuminate in ventral view; basal processes well separated from shaft, shorter than shaft, evenly divergent; distal processes long, subapical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Wayne Co., Fairfield, on Quercus imbricaria, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. Figure 2. E. gillettei (Beamer). c – holotype; a, b, d, e – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 103 4. Eratoneura lamucata (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 4, Plate 2d) Erythroneura lamucata Ross & DeLong, 1953a:88 Eratoneura lamucata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; append- age simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points. Angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth, with lateral lobes at base; apex blunt in ventral view, abruptly bent dorsad; basal processes absent, distal processes long, apical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, McLean Co., Lake Bloomington, on Rhus toxicoden- dron, 29 IX 1950 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Toxicodendron radicans. 5. Eratoneura maculata (Gillette, 1898) (Fig. 5, Plate 2e) Typhlocyba comes var. maculata Gillette, 1898a:764 Typhlocyba maculata Baker, 1903d:8 Erythroneura comes var. maculata Van Duzee, 1916a:77 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) maculata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura maculata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 Figure 4. E. lamucata (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Figure 3. E. imbricariae (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Vol. 39 Art.3104 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth, with lateral lobes at base; apex blunt in ventral view, abruptly bent dorsad; basal processes absent; distal processes long, apical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Syntypes 2 , USA, Kansas, Pottawatomie Co., Onaga, (Crevecoeur), (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada Host plants: Toxicodendron radicans. 6. Eratoneura eversi (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 6, Plate 2f) Erythroneura eversi Ross & DeLong, 1953a:88 Eratoneura eversi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.4–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points more than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth; apex broadened in ventral view; basal processes absent; distal processes long, subapical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Alexander Co., N.W. Tamms, on Corylus americana, 20 IX 1950 (Ross & Evers), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 5. E. maculata (Gillette). a – from Dietrich & Dmitriev (2006a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 105 7. Eratoneura noncuspidis (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 7, Plate 2g) Erythroneura noncuspidis Beamer, 1931a:129 Erythroneura noncuspidus DeLong & Caldwell, 1937c:76, missp. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) noncuspidis Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura noncuspidis Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygo- fer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth, with lateral lobes at base; apex truncate in ventral view; basal processes absent; distal processes long, apical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Lawrence Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Toxicodendron radicans. Figure 7. E. noncuspidis (Beamer). Figure 6. E. eversi (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Vol. 39 Art.3106 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 8. Eratoneura teshi (Hepner, 1972) (Fig. 8, Plate 2h) Erythroneura teshi Hepner, 1972c:267 Eratoneura teshi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally; apex emarginate in ventral view; basal processes absent; distal processes long, apical, slender. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 28 I 1962 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Ulmus rubra. Notes: The type locality recorded in the original publication was: Illinois, Piatt Co., Monticello, Allerton Park, on Ulmus rubra, 26 IX 1960 (Cunningham). 9. Eratoneura osborni (DeLong, 1916) (Fig. 9, Plate 2i) Typhlocyba osborni DeLong, 1916a:103 Erythroneura osborni Van Duzee, 1917b:712 Erythroneura basilaris var. dulcis McAtee, 1920a:296, syn.n. (Plate 2i2) Erythroneura (Eratoneura) osborni Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura osborni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, tooth- like; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad at apex, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; apex blunt in ventral view; basal processes arising close to shaft, shorter than shaft, divergent at base, thence parallel; distal processes absent. Forewing with broad red or reddish crossband in basal third. Figure 8. E. teshi (Hepner). a, c–e – paratype; b – from Hepner (1972c). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 107 Type locality: Holotype , USA, Tennessee, Montgomery Co., Clarksville, 22 VII 1915 (De- Long), (OSU). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Carya ovata, C. illinoinensis, C. ovalis, C. glabra, C. tomentosa, C. leiodermis, and other species of Carya. 10. Eratoneura sandersoni (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 10, Plate 2j) Erythroneura sandersoni Ross, 1956a:90 Eratoneura sandersoni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 1996a:138 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina, often with lateral lobes at base; apex acuminate or blunt in ventral view; basal processes well separated from shaft, parallel to each other on ventral side of shaft, short, toothlike; distal processes absent. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Hardin Co., Elizabethtown, on Acer sp., 27 VII 1951 (Richards & Sanderson), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 9. E. osborni (DeLong). e1–e2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus basal pro- cesses; e2 – unusual form; a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3108 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 11. Eratoneura crinita (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 11, Plate 2k) Erythroneura crinita Beamer, 1932e:85 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) crinita Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura crinita Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, with ring of long spines near mid- length. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina; apex acuminate in ventral view; basal processes arising close to shaft, shorter than shaft, slightly divergent, appressed to sides of shaft; distal processes absent. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arkansas, Searcy Co., Marshall, 22 III 1931 (Nottingham), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Castanea pumila. Figure 10. E. sandersoni (Ross). a1–b2, – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; d1–e2 – variation of shape of aedeagus; a2, d1 – from Ross (1956a); e2 – holotype. Figure 11. E. crinita (Beamer). c – holotype; d – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 109 12. Eratoneura andersoni (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 12, Plate 2l) Erythroneura andersoni Beamer, 1932e:86 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) andersoni Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura andersoni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, with ring of long spines near midlength. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus triangular, without sclerotized connection to anal tube or pygofer append- ages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, smooth, with small dorsal distal lobe; apex acuminate in ventral view; basal processes arising close to shaft, almost as long as shaft, parallel to each other on ventral side of shaft; distal processes ab- sent. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arkansas, Searcy Co., Marshall, 22 III 1931 (Anderson), (KSEM). distribution: South central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Unknown. 13. Eratoneura paraesculi (Knull, 1945) (Fig. 13, Plate 2m) Erythroneura paraesculi Knull, 1945b:106 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) paraesculi Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura paraesculi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 3.5–3.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally; aedeagal apex broadened in ventral view; basal processes arising close to shaft, shorter than shaft, divergent at base, curved posterad; distal processes absent. Forewings with 2 crossbands not reaching lateral margins. Figure 12. E. andersoni (Beamer). c – paratype; a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3110 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Type locality: Holotype , USA, Tennessee, Sevier Co., Great Smoky Mountain National Park, Indian Gap, 5000 to 6000 ft., on Aesculus sp., 21 VI 1942 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: South of central USA. Host plants: Unknown, the holotype was collected on Aesculus sp. 14. Eratoneura tammina (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 14, Plate 2n) Erythroneura tammina Ross & DeLong, 1953a:86 Eratoneura tammina Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; prea- trium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally; apex truncate in ventral view; basal processes arising close to shaft, shorter than shaft, parallel to each other on ventral side of shaft or slightly divergent; distal processes absent. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Alexander Co., N.W. Tamms, 20 IX 1950 (Ross & Evers), (INHS). distribution: South of central USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. michauxii, Q. lyrata, Q. falcata, and other species of Quercus. Figure 13. E. paraesculi (Knull). a, c–e – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 14. E. tammina (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 111 15. Eratoneura texana (Beamer, 1929) (Fig. 15, Plate 2o) Erythroneura texana Beamer, 1929b:121 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) texana Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura texana Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with prea- trium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, denticulate distally; basal processes well separated from shaft, short, parallel to each other on ventral side of shaft; distal processes absent. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Culberson Co., 10 VII 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Texas. Host plants: Unknown. 16. Eratoneura separata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 16, Plate 2p) Erythroneura separata Beamer, 1932a:12 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) separata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura separata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate near base, branches paral- lel to each other, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex broadened in ventral view, bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: North central USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Tilia americana. Figure 15. E. texana (Beamer). d – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3112 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 17. Eratoneura curvata (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 17, Plate 2q) Erythroneura curvata Beamer, 1931a:132 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) curvata Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura curvata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage bifurcate near base, branches parallel to each other, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point absent or short toothlike; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Douglas Co., 1927, (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa. Figure 16. E. separata (Beamer). a, c – paratype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 17. E. curvata (Beamer). c, d – holotype; a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 113 18. Eratoneura restricta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 18, Plate 2r) Erythroneura restricta Beamer, 1932c:45 Erythroneura pallida Knull & Auten, 1937a:573, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) restricta Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura restricta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate near base, branches forcipate, extended to or beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without pro- cesses; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Story Co., Ames, 18 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus alba. 19. Eratoneura impar (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 19, Plate 2s) Erythroneura impar Beamer, 1931a:133 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) impar Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura impar Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate near base, branch- Figure 18. E. restricta (Beamer). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a2 – holo- type; a1, b2, c – holotype of E. pallida Knull & Auten; b1–b2 – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3114 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin es parallel to each other, not extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex short, toothlike; third point very short or absent. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and Eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus muehlenbergii, Q. prinus, and other species of Quercus. 20. Eratoneura carmini (Beamer, 1929) (Fig. 20, Plate 2t) Erythroneura carmini Beamer, 1929b:121 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) carmini Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura carmini Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a: description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; ap- pendage bifurcate near base, branches parallel to each other, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point absent or short and toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without process- es; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 9 IX 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: USA, southern Canada. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa, Q. lyrata, Q. michauxii, Q. stellata, Q. pagoda, and other spe- cies of Quercus. Figure 19. E. impar (Beamer). a1–a3 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage, c – holo- type. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 115 21. Eratoneura forfex (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 21, Plate 2u) Erythroneura forfex Beamer, 1932e:82 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) forfex Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura forfex Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate near base, branches parallel to each other, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arkansas, Polk Co., 21 VIII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus alba, Q. macrocarpa, and other species of Quercus. 22. Eratoneura linea (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 22, Plate 3a) Erythroneura linea Beamer, 1932c:47 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) linea Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura linea Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage expanded and denticulate at apex, Figure 20. E. carmini (Beamer). a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 21. E. forfex (Beamer). a, c – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3116 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with large lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Cherokee Co., 29 XI 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA and south central Canada. Host plants: Betula sp. 23. Eratoneura rangifer (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 23, Plate 3b) Erythroneura rangifer Ross & DeLong, 1950a:292 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) rangifer Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura rangifer Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age expanded at apex with numerous long spines, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without appendages; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Clark Co., Rocky Branch, on Corylus americana, 14 IX 1949 (Stannard & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 22. E. linea (Beamer). a1–a2 – variation of shape of the pygofer ap- pendage. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 117 24. Eratoneura dimidiata (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 24, Plate 3c) Erythroneura dimidiata Knull, 1949a:122 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) dimidiata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura dimidiata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base; apex broadened in ventral view, abruptly bent dorsad; without basal processes; distal processes short, apical, toothlike. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 28 VI, (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 23. E. rangifer (Ross & DeLong). a1–a2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a2–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Figure 24. E. dimidiata (Knull). a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3118 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 25. Eratoneura sanctaerosae (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 25, Plate 3d) Erythroneura sanctaerosae Hepner, 1967a:24 Eratoneura sanctaerosae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; ap- pendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Ae- deagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Santa Rosa Co., on Acer rubrum, 13 VIII 1955 (Mead), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Florida. Host plants: Unknown; the holotype was collected on Acer rubrum. 26. Eratoneura betulae sp.n. (Fig. 26, Plate 3e) description: Length 2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base, branches crossing each other in dorsal view. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than dis- tance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus parallelsid- ed, connection to pygofer membranous; preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed and triangular in ventral view, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Dorsum yellowish with red or orange color pattern; vertex with orange parallel submedial lines with lateral branch and pale midline; anteclypeus pale, concolorous with rest of face; pronotum with Y-shaped medial vitta; mesonotum pale, with reddish lateral triangles, apex concolorous with rest of mesonotum; thoracic venter entirely pale; forewings with broken oblique vittae, without crossbands; clavus with separate basal and distal vittae, with dark spot on costal margin, inner apical cell with brown spot basally. Figure 25. E. sanctaerosae (Hepner). a, c–e – holotype; b – from Hepner (1967a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 119 diagnosis: Similar to E. concisa (Beamer) and E. spala (Ross & DeLong), but with the shaft of the aedeagus triangular in ventral view and the branches of the forked pygofer appendage crossing each other in dorsal view. Type locality: Holotype , Canada, New Brunswick, Fredericton, on Betula lutea, 30 VIII 1959 (Varty), (INHS). Studied material: Paratypes: 2 , Canada, New Brunswick, Odell Park, Fredericton, on Betula lutea, 25 IX 1961 (Varty), (CNC); 1 , same locality, on Betula lutea, 29 IX 1961 (Varty), (MEM); 1 , same locality, on Betula lutea, 11 X 1961 (Varty), (MEM). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in New Brunswick. Host plants: Betula lutea. Notes: The name refers to the host plant. 27. Eratoneura concisa (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 27, Plate 3f) Erythroneura concisa Beamer, 1931d:286 Erythroneura consueta Beamer, 1932d:71, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) concisa Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura caverna Hepner, 1967a:23, syn.n. Erythroneura lucora Hepner, 1967a:24, syn.n. Eratoneura concisa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage bifurcate far from base, variable in shape, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, round in ventral view, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Aesculus sp., Corylus americana. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape and relative length of the branches of the pygofer appendage (Fig. 27a1–a4). Figure 26. E. betulae sp.n. a – e – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3120 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 28. Eratoneura spala (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 28, Plate 3g) Erythroneura spala Ross & DeLong, 1950a:294 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) spala Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura spala Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.4–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, dis- tinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Clark Co., Rocky Branch, on Fagus grandifolia, 14 IX 1949 (Stannard & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Ostrya virginiana, O. caroliniana, Carpinus caroliniana, Corylus americana, Fagus grandifolia, and probably some other plants. Figure 27. E. concisa (Beamer). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a1, b1 – var. concisa Beamer; a2, b2 – var. consueta Beamer; a3 – var. lucora Hepner; a2, b1, b2 – from Hepner (unpublished); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 121 29. Eratoneura harpola (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 29, Plate 3h) Erythroneura harpola Ross, 1956a:85 Eratoneura harpola Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.3–2.5 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Pike Co., Kinderhook, on Acer saccharum, 9 VIII 1951 (Richards & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Ostrya virginiana. Figure 28. E. spala (Ross & DeLong). b – holotype; d – paratype; a, c, e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Figure 29. E. harpola (Ross). c – paratype; a, d, e – from Ross (1956a). Vol. 39 Art.3122 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 30. Eratoneura minor (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 30, Plate 3i) Erythroneura minor Beamer, 1932e:84 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) minor Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura minor Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobe, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Story Co., Ames, 18 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA, south central Canada. Host plants: Crataegus mollis. 31. Eratoneura aesculi (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 31, Plate 3j) Erythroneura aesculi Beamer, 1932c:46 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) aesculi Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura aesculi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Forewing with large red spot at base. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Lowndes Co., Columbus, 16 VII 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Aesculus sp. Figure 30. E. minor (Beamer). c, d – holotype; a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 123 32. Eratoneura bifida (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 32, Plate 3k) Erythroneura bifida Beamer, 1931a:134 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) bifida Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura bifida Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ven- trad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Forewing with two spots: one at base, another at apex of clavus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Louisiana, Caddo Co., Caddo Parish, 19 VIII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Aesculus sp. Notes: The male genitalia of this species are identical to those of E. aesculi (Beamer). The two species are different only in the color pattern, and in size. Figure 31. E. aesculi (Beamer). c – holotype; a, b, d, e – paratype. Figure 32. E. bifida (Beamer). a, b – paratype; c – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3124 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 33. Eratoneura aculeata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 33, Plate 3l) Erythroneura aculeata Beamer, 1932g:161 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) aculeata Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura woodruffi Hepner, 1967a:23, syn.n. Eratoneura aculeata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes and processes, apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Clayton Co., 19 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Corylus americana, Fagus grandifolia, Carpinus caroliniana. 34. Eratoneura lusoria (Van Duzee, 1924) (Fig. 34, Plate 3m) Erythroneura lusoria Van Duzee, 1924a:234 Erythroneura coryli Van Duzee, 1924a:234 (sec. hom. of Typhlocyba coryli Tollin, 1851a), syn.n. Erythroneura californica Beamer, 1932f:143, n.nov., syn.n. Erythroneura (Erythridula) lusoria Young, 1952b:83 Erythridula lusoria Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:129 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Ae- deagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally; without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings usu- ally with oblique vittae forming continuous zigzag pattern. Type locality: Holotype , USA, California, Alameda Co., Leona Heights, VIII, (Bradley), (CAS). Figure 33. E. aculeata (Beamer). c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 125 distribution: California. Host plants: Corylus sp. Notes: The holotype of E. lusoria (Van Duzee, 1924) is a color form with poorly developed color pattern consisting of separate maculae (Plate 3m2). 35. Eratoneura pyra (McAtee, 1924) (Fig. 35, Plates 1c, 3n) Erythroneura pyra McAtee, 1924d:133 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) pyra Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura pyra Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae forming zigzag pattern in basal half. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Polk Co., Berwick, 28 IX 1895, (USNM). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Aesculus glabra. Figure 34. E. lusoria (Van Duzee). Figure 35. E. pyra (McAtee). Vol. 39 Art.3126 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 36. Eratoneura millsi (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 36, Plate 3o) Erythroneura millsi Ross & DeLong, 1950a:291 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) millsi Young, 1952b:120 Erythroneura schista Knull, 1955a:246, syn.n. Eratoneura millsi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point absent or short toothlike; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., Gibsonia, on Quercus stellata, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata. Notes: E. schista Knull was described based on a specimen with a longer dorsal branch of the pygofer appendage (Fig. 36a2). The relative lengths of the branches vary intraspecifically. 37. Eratoneura longifurca (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 37, Plate 3p) Erythroneura longifurca Hepner, 1966c:3 Eratoneura longifurca Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes Figure 36. E. millsi (Ross & DeLong). a1–a2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a2 – var. schista Knull; a2–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 127 at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 4 III 1962 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Mississippi. Host plants: Unknown. 38. Eratoneura manus (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 38, Plate 3q) Erythroneura manus Beamer, 1932e:83 Erythroneura tenilla Ross & DeLong, 1950a:294, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) manus Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura colmeri Hepner, 1969a:132, syn.n. Eratoneura manus Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage expanded towards apex, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus triangular, without sclerotized connection to anal tube or pygofer appendages; with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus velutina, Q. stellata, Q. rubra var. ambigua, Q. alba, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quercus. Figure 37. E. longifurca (Hepner). a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 38. E. manus (Beamer). e1–e2 – variation of shape of the aedeagal shaft; e2 – var. tenilla Ross & DeLong; a–d, e2 – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Vol. 39 Art.3128 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 39. Eratoneura staffordi (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 39, Plate 3r) Erythroneura staffordi Hepner, 1966c:3 Eratoneura staffordi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 3–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base or expanded towards apex, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinu- ate in dorsal view, curved downward distally in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate at apex. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Carpinus caro- liniana, 7 IV 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Mississippi. Host plants: Carpinus caroliniana. 40. Eratoneura ardens (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 40, Plates 1d, 3s) Typhlocyba comes var. scutellaris Gillette,1898a:764 (prim.hom. of Typhlocyba scutellaris Herrich- Schäffer, 1838c), syn.n. Typhlocyba comes var. scutelleris Gillette, 1898a:764, missp. Erythroneura maculata var. ardens McAtee, 1920a:299 Erythroneura kansana Baker, 1925b:537 n.nov., syn.n. Erythroneura scutellaris var. insolita McAtee, 1926c:133, syn.n. (Plate 3s3) Erythroneura kansana var. ardens Beamer, 1932f:138 Erythroneura ardens Oman, 1949a:95 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) ardens Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura ardens Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.7–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; Figure 39. E. staffordi (Hepner). c–e – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 129 appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, but usually with dark brown mesonotum. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Maryland, Montgomery Co., Plummers Island, 28 III 1915 (McAtee), (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Ulmus americana, U. alata, and U. rubra. 41. Eratoneura uvaldeana (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 41, Plate 3t) Erythroneura uvaldeana Knull, 1949a:125 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) uvaldeana Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura uvaldeana Dietrich & Dmi- triev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.6–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe round- ed; appendage compressed, bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae forming con- tinuous zigzag pattern, without crossbands. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Uvalde Co., Uvalde, Garner Park, on Quercus sp., 4 VIII 1937 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Texas. Host plants: Quercus sp. Figure 40. E. ardens (McAtee). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3130 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 42. Eratoneura inepta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 42, Plate 4a) Erythroneura inepta Beamer, 1932g:162 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) inepta Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura hutchinsi Hepner, 1966c:2, syn.n. (Plate 4a2) Eratoneura inepta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3.1–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage compressed, bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, compressed, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lat- eral view, widest at middle, denticulate dorsally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus michauxii and Q. stellata. Figure 41. E. uvaldeana (Knull). a2, c, d – holotype; a1 – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 131 43. Eratoneura firma (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 43, Plate 4b) Erythroneura firma Beamer, 1932a:12 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) firma Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura velox Ross, 1953b:190, syn.n. Erythroneura thaxtoni Hepner, 1966c:2, syn.n. Erythroneura cunninghami Hepner, 1966c:3, syn.n. Erythroneura shumiquera Hepner, 1972a:431, syn.n. Erythroneura combesi Hepner, 1972c:267, syn.n. Eratoneura firma Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, thickened along dorsal margin, dis- tinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 9 IX 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus lyrata, Q. michauxii, Q. stellata, Q. prinus, and other species of Quercus. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape and relative length of the branches of the pygofer appendage (Fig. 43a). Figure 42. E. inepta (Beamer). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a2, b2 – var. hutchinsi Hepner; c – holotype; a1, b1, b2 – from Hepner (unpublished); a2 – from Hepner (1966c). Vol. 39 Art.3132 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 44. Eratoneura bispinosa (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 44, Plate 4c) Erythroneura bispinosa Beamer, 1931b:241 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) bispinosa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura bispinosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Py- gofer lobe rounded; appendage strongly compressed, bifurcate far from base, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 9 IX 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Ulmus americana, U. alata, U. rubra, Ilex decidua. Figure 43. E. firma (Beamer). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a1 – holotype; a2 – holotype of E. velox Ross; b1 – paratype of E. thaxtoni Hepner; d1–d2 – variation in shape of the aedeagus; d1 – holotype; d2 – paratype of E. thax- toni Hepner; b2, c – from Ross (1953b). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 133 45. Eratoneura hyalina (Knull & Auten, 1937) (Fig. 45, Plate 4d) Erythroneura hyalina Knull & Auten, 1937a:575 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) hyalina Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura hyalina Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, with ventral branch considerably longer than dorsal, extended to pygofer apex, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Georgia, DeKalb Co., Decatur, 17 IV 1934 (Auten), (OSU). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Georgia. Host plants: Unknown. Figure 44. E. bispinosa (Beamer). a, b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 45. E. hyalina (Knull & Auten). a–d – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3134 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 46. Eratoneura harnedi (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 46, Plate 4e) Erythroneura harnedi Hepner, 1966c:5 Eratoneura harnedi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base or three pointed, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., Shawneetown, on Quercus imbricaria, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. 47. Eratoneura unica (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 47, Plate 4f) Erythroneura unica Beamer, 1932e:83 Erythroneura quercalbae Ross & DeLong, 1950a:294, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) unica Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura unica Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Clayton Co., 19 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus alba. Figure 46. E. harnedi (Hepner). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 135 48. Eratoneura mira (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 48, Plate 4g) Erythroneura mira Beamer, 1932c:45 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) mira Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura mira Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.7–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, not extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lat- eral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Wabash Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, two specimens are known from Colorado. Host plants: Quercus alba. Figure 47. E. unica (Beamer). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Figure 48. E. mira (Beamer). a, c – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3136 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 49. Eratoneura facota (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 49, Plate 4h) Erythroneura facota Beamer, 1932d:70 Erythroneura facata DeLong & Caldwell, 1937c:77, missp. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) facota Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura facota Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage bifurcate far from base, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Pasco Co., Lacoochee, on Quercus sp., 18 VIII 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Florida. Host plants: Quercus sp. 50. Eratoneura cristata (Knull, 1951) (Fig. 50, Plate 4i) Erythroneura cristata Knull, 1951b:174 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) cristata Young, 1952b:120 Erythroneura spiniterma Hepner, 1969a:133, syn.n. Eratoneura cristata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage expanded towards apex, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate apically. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Scioto Co., 10 VI 1944 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus alba, Q. stellata. Figure 49. E. facota (Beamer). a, c – holotype; d – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 137 51. Eratoneura mcateei sp.n. (Fig. 51, Plate 4j) description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage expanded to apex, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate apically. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus parallelsided, connection to pygofer membranous; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Dorsum yellow or white with orange color pattern; vertex with orange parallel submedial lines with lateral branch, midline pale; anteclypeus pale, concolorous with rest of face; pronotum with Y-shaped medial vitta; mesonotum pale, with orange lateral triangles and apex; thoracic venter entirely pale. Forewings with broken oblique vittae, without crossbands; clavus with separate basal and distal vittae; dark spot at costal margin; inner apical cell with brown spot basally. diagnosis: Similar to E. manus (Beamer), but with the aedeagal shaft less curved in lateral view and with large lateral lobes at the base of the shaft. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Mason Co., Havana, 2 VII 1934 (DeLong & Ross), (INHS). Studied material: Paratypes: USA, 2 , Illinois, Franklin Co., Christopher, on Quercus mari- landica, 5 VIII 1954 (Ross & Moore), (INHS); 2 , Illinois, Franklin Co., Royalton, on Quercus marilandica, 5 VIII 1954 (Ross & Moore), (INHS); 1 , Illinois, Henderson Co., Oquawka, sand ridge, on Quercus sp., 3 VII 1934 (DeLong & Ross), (INHS); 75 , Illinois, Mason Co., Forest City, on Quercus marilandica, 11 IX 1953 (Stannard & Ross), (INHS); 1 , Illinois, Mason Co., Forest City, on Quercus marilandica, 11 IX 1953 (Sanderson & Ross), (INHS); 23 , Illinois, Mason Co., Forest City, on Quercus marilandica, 8 IX 1954 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS); 2 , Illi- nois, Mason Co., Havana, 2 VII 1934 (DeLong & Ross), (INHS); 1 , Illinois, Mason Co., Mason County State Wildlife Refuge, on Quercus sp., 21 V 1953 (Moore), (INHS); 1 , Illinois, Morgan Co., Meredosia, on Quercus marilandica, 2 X 1951 (Sanderson & Stannard), (INHS); 32 , Il- linois, Morgan Co., Meredosia, on Quercus marilandica, 8 IX 1954 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). Other studied material from Kansas, Illinois, Mississippi, and Maryland excluded from paratypes. distribution: Central and norteastern USA. Host plants: Quercus marilandica. Notes: The species is named in honor of Dr. W.L. McAtee, a researcher who described many spe- cies of Erythroneura at the beginning of the 20th century. Figure 50. E. cristata (Knull). a, c, d – holotype; b, e – holotype of E. spiniterma Hepner. Vol. 39 Art.3138 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 52. Eratoneura ungulata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 52, Plate 4k) Erythroneura ungulata Beamer, 1932d:69 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) ungulata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura ungulata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage expanded towards apex, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate at apex. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acute in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Louisiana, Natchitoches Co., Natchitoche Parish, 16 VIII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: South of central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata. Figure 51. E. mcateei sp.n. Figure 52. E. ungulata (Beamer). c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 139 53. Eratoneura distincta (Knull & Auten, 1937) (Fig. 53, Plate 4l) Erythroneura distincta Knull & Auten, 1937a:572 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) distincta Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura priniquera Hepner, 1967b:68, syn.n. Eratoneura distincta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, compressed, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points more than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; apex truncate in ventral view; basal processes arising near midlength of shaft, flattened and evenly divergent; distal processes absent. Coloration usual for genus, color pattern in distal part of forewing brighter. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Georgia, DeKalb Co., Decatur, 25 IV 1934 (Auten), (OSU). distribution: South of central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus prinus. 54. Eratoneura spinea (Knull, 1951) (Fig. 54, Plate 4m) Erythroneura spinea Knull, 1951b:172 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) spinea Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura spinea Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, compressed, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate ventrally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Story Co., Ames, 1 VII 1895 (Ball), (OSU). distribution: North of central USA. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 53. E. distincta (Knull & Auten). c – holotype; a, b, d, e – holotype of E. priniquera Hepner. Vol. 39 Art.3140 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 55. Eratoneura rotunda (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 55, Plates 1h, 4n) Erythroneura rotunda Beamer, 1931d:288 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) rotunda Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura rotunda Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base or at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, com- pressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA, one male recorded from west Texas. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 54. E. spinea (Knull). a – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 55. E. rotunda (Beamer). b1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; c–e – from Ross (1958a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 141 56. Eratoneura nigriventer (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 56, Plate 4o) Erythroneura nigriventer Beamer, 1931a:134 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) nigriventer Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura nigriventer Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, flattened, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved down- ward in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes of processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, abdomen with dark venter and dorsum. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Betula nigra. 57. Eratoneura stupkaorum (Knull, 1945) (Fig. 57, Plate 4p) Erythroneura stupkaorum Knull, 1945b:104 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) stupkaorum Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura stupkaorum Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 3.1–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Tennessee, Sevier Co., Great Smoky Mountain National Park, 5000 to 6000 ft., 14 IV 1942 (Knull), (OSU). Figure 56. E. nigriventer (Beamer). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3142 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin distribution: Tennessee, Ohio. Host plants: Unknown. 58. Eratoneura usitata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 58, Plate 4q) Erythroneura usitata Beamer, 1932a:14 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) usitata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura usitata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate at apex. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Notes: The holotype was collected on 30 III 1929, not on 3 III 1929 as stated in the original publi- cation. Figure 57. E. stupkaorum (Knull). a – e – paratype. Figure 58. E. usitata (Beamer). b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 143 59. Eratoneura incondita (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 59, Plate 4r) Erythroneura incondita Beamer, 1932a:16 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) incondita Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura incondita Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal and lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate distally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, as long as distance between other two points or shorter; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: North of central USA. Host plants: Acer saccharum. 60. Eratoneura ingrata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 60, Plate 4s) Erythroneura ingrata Beamer, 1932g:160 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) ingrata Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura ingrata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, compressed, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate distally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., 30 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Figure 59. E. incondita (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished); c – e – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3144 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 61. Eratoneura arenosa (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 61, Plate 4t) Erythroneura arenosa Ross & DeLong, 1950a:295 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) arenosa Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura arenosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.4–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, abruptly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Cook Co., Thornton, on Corylus americana, 7 IX 1949 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 60. E. ingrata (Beamer). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 61. E. arenosa (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 145 62. Eratoneura uncinata (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 62, Plate 4u) Erythroneura uncinata Beamer, 1931b:242 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) uncinata Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura doeringae Hepner, 1975a:7, syn.n. Eratoneura uncinata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.4–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, compressed, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dor- sal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex broadened in ventral view, sharply bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Notes: The holotype was collected on 28 IV 1928, not on 4 IV 1928 as stated in the original publi- cation. 63. Eratoneura arpegia (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 63, Plate 4v) Erythroneura arpegia Ross, 1957a:188 Eratoneura arpegia Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Py- gofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, compressed in distal half, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dor- sal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Mesonotum dark brown, forewing without oblique vittae, with 3 narrow crossbands Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Adams Co., N. Kinderhook, on Quercus imbricaria, 9 IX 1954 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. Figure 62. E. uncinata (Beamer). c – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3146 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 64. Eratoneura propria (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 64, Plate 4w) Erythroneura propria Beamer, 1932a:13 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) propria Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura propria Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle, denticu- late. Second and third points of style apex very short, tooth- like. Aedeagus with preatrium as long as shaft or shorter; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus chapmanii, Q. stellata, Q. prinus, Q. marilandica, Q. myrtifolia, and other species of Quercus. 65. Eratoneura brevipes (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 65, Plate 5a) Erythroneura brevipes Beamer, 1931a:133 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) brevipes Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura brevipes Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal Figure 63. E. arpegia (Ross). a–e – from Ross (1957a). Figure 64. E. propria (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 147 apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, compressed, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedea- gus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Oklahoma, Le Flore Co., on Quercus sp., 24 V 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus marilandica, Q. nigra, Q. macrocarpa, Q. stellata, and other species of Quercus. 66. Eratoneura turgida (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 66, Plate 5b) Erythroneura turgida Beamer, 1931b:243 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) turgida Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura ratcliffensis Hepner, 1966a:85, syn.n. Eratoneura turgida Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apo- deme of aedeagus triangular, without sclerotized connection to anal tube or pygofer appendages; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Carya glabra, C. tomentosa, C. carolinae-septentrionalis, C. aquatica, C. ovata, and other species of Carya. Figure 65. E. brevipes (Beamer). a – from Hepner (unpublished); b–c – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3148 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 67. Eratoneura delongi (Knull & Auten, 1937) (Fig. 67, Plate 5c) Erythroneura delongi Knull & Auten, 1937a:574 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) delongi Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura paluloides Ross, 1953b:189, syn.n. Eratoneura delongi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe an- gulate; appendage simple, compressed in distal half, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Georgia, DeKalb Co., Decatur, Agnes Scott College Campus, on Cryptomeria japonica, 17 IV 1934 (Auten), (OSU). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus nigra, Q. palustris, Q. laurifolia, and other species of Quercus. Figure 66. E. turgida (Beamer). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 67. E. delongi (Knull & Auten). a, c – from Ross (1953b); b – from Ross (1958a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 149 68. Eratoneura immota (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 68, Plate 5d) Erythroneura immota Beamer, 1932a:16 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) immota Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura immota Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, compressed in distal half, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slen- der in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes, apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Bowie Co., 16 VIII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus phellos, Q. laurifolia, Q. nigra, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on 16 VIII 1928, not on 8 VIII 1928 as stated in the original publication. 69. Eratoneura tantilla (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 69, Plate 5e) Erythroneura tantilla Beamer, 1931d:285 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) tantilla Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura freytagi Hepner, 1966a:83, syn.n. Erythroneura amboyensis Hepner, 1972a:431, syn.n. Erythroneura alveyi Hepner, 1972c:269, syn.n. Erythroneura atkinsoni Hepner, 1972c:270, syn.n. Eratoneura tantilla Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate distally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA,, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). Figure 68. E. immota (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3150 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. macrocarpa, Q. phellos, Q prinus, and other species of Quercus. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape of the pygofer appendage, style, and aedeagus (Fig. 69). 70. Eratoneura sorota (Hepner, 1975) (Fig. 70, Plate 5f) Erythroneura sorota Hepner, 1975a:5 Eratoneura sorota Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at middle, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Clinton Co., Carlyle, on Carya ovata, 15 VIII 1951 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Carya illinoinensis, C. ovata, and C. aquatica. Figure 69. E. tantilla (Beamer). c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; c1, d – holotype; c2 – para- type of E. freytagi Hepner; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 70. E. sorota (Hepner). a–e – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 151 71. Eratoneura solita (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 71, Plate 5g) Erythroneura solita Beamer, 1932a:14 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) solita Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura solita Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view or slightly curved ventrad, round in crossection, denticu- late distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Lawrence Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: North of central USA, south of central Canada. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa, Q. bicolor. 72. Eratoneura knullae (Ross, 1953) (Fig. 72, Plate 5h) Erythroneura knullae Ross, 1953b:192 Erythroneura solida Knull, 1954b:171, syn.n. Erythroneura blockeri Hepner, 1967b:72, syn.n. Erythroneura pumicasta Hepner, 1967b:72, syn.n. Eratoneura knullae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view or curved ventrad, round in crossection or compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., Grantsburg, on Quercus palustris, 31 VIII 1951 (Richards & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Figure 71. E. solita (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3152 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Host plants: Quercus lyrata, Q. nigra, Q. palustris, and other species of Quercus. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape of the pygofer appendage and aedeagus (Fig. 72). 73. Eratoneura omani (Beamer, 1930) (Fig. 73, Plate 5i) Erythroneura omani Beamer, 1930a:49 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) omani Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura omani Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dor- sad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with small dorsal distal lobe, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Douglas Co., 10 IX 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Malus sp. Recorded as a pest by Beamer (1930a, 1932b). Figure 72. E. knullae (Ross). e1–e2 – varitation of shape of the aedeagus; e1 – holotype; a–d – from Ross (1953b). Figure 73. E. omani (Beamer). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 153 74. Eratoneura mimica (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 74, Plate 5j) Erythroneura mimica Ross, 1957a:190 Erythroneura brucensis Hepner, 1975a:6, syn.n. Eratoneura mimica Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slen- der in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with denticulate lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Ogle Co., Oregon, on Quercus rubra var. ambigua, 15 IX 1955 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus rubra var. ambigua and probably other species of Quercus. 75. Eratoneura sancta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 75, Plate 5k) Erythroneura sancta Beamer, 1932a:15 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) sancta Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura acericola Ross & DeLong, 1953a:88, syn.n. Eratoneura sancta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with denticulate lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 3 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA, south central Canada. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 74. E. mimica (Ross). a, c, d – from Ross (1957a); b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3154 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 76. Eratoneura inksana (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 76, Plate 5l) Erythroneura inksana Knull, 1954b:170 Erythroneura cavipierra Hepner, 1967b:64, syn.n. Eratoneura inksana Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Burnet Co., Inks Lake State Park, on Quercus sp., 5 IV 1953 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Texas, southern Illinois. Host plants: Quercus stellata. Figure 75. E. sancta (Beamer). e1–e2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; e1 – var. acericola Ross & DeLong; e2 – holotype; a–e1 – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Figure 76. E. inksana (Knull). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 155 77. Eratoneura alloplana (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 77, Plate 5m) Erythroneura alloplana Ross, 1956a:88 Eratoneura alloplana Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Mason Co., Forest City, on Quercus marilandica, 11 IX 1953 (Sanderson & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quercus. 78. Eratoneura parva (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 78, Plate 5n) Erythroneura parva Beamer, 1932d:70 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) parva Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura vacua Knull, 1954b:174, syn.n. Erythroneura kirki Hepner, 1967b:64, syn.n. Eratoneura parva Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Louisiana, Natchitoches Co., Natchitoche Parish, 16 VIII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. prinus, and other species of Quercus. Figure 77. E. alloplana (Ross). e – holotype, a–d – from Ross (1956a). Vol. 39 Art.3156 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 79. Eratoneura mirifica (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 79, Plate 5o) Erythroneura mirifica Beamer, 1932d:159 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) mirifica Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura nielsoni Hepner, 1967b:62, syn.n. Erythroneura neilsoni Hepner, 1967b:65, missp. Eratoneura mirifica Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without process- es; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus bicolor, Q. lyrata, Q. macrocarpa, and other species of Quercus. Figure 78. E. parva (Beamer). c – holotype. Figure 79. E. mirifica (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 157 80. Eratoneura abjecta (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 80, Plate 5p) Erythroneura abjecta Beamer, 1931d:288 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) abjecta Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura abjecta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:133 description: Length 2.8–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus rubra, Q. alba, Q. velutina, and other species of Quercus. 81. Eratoneura hartii (Gillette, 1898) (Fig. 81, Plate 5q) Typhlocyba hartii Gillette, 1898a:754 Typhlocyba harti Wirtner, 1904a:227, missp. Erythroneura hartii Van Duzee, 1916a:77 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) hartii Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura hartii Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, smooth, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view, depressed, sharply bent dorsad. Forewings largle red with yellow costal margin, apices and diamond shaped spot in middle. Type locality: Lectotype , USA, Illinois, Champaign Co., Champaign, 22–23 IV 1895, #14873 (Hart), (CSUC), with the label “CSU29”, here designated. Figure 80. E. abjecta (Beamer). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3158 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Studied material: Paralectotypes 1 , USA, Illinois, Champaign Co., Champaign, 22–23 IV 1895, #14877, (Hart), (CSUC); 1 , same locality and date, (INHS), here designated. distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Malus ioensis, M. pumila. Notes: We designate a lectotype from the original series of syntypes to stabilize the concept of this species name. 82. Eratoneura misera (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 82, Plate 5r) Erythroneura misera Beamer, 1932g:158 Erythroneura ventura Knull & Auten, 1937a:577, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) misera Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura misera Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.5–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; aedeagal shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without processes or lateral lobes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southern Canada. Host plants: Carpinus caroliniana. Figure 81. E. hartii (Gillette). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 82. E. misera (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 159 83. Eratoneura nevadensis (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 83, Plate 5s) Erythroneura nevadensis Beamer, 1932d:72 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) nevadensis Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura nevadensis Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded. Pygofer appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view or curved dorsad, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, mesonotum with dark brown apex. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Nevada, Carson City Co., Carson City, 9 VIII 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Nevada. Host plants: Unknown. 84. Eratoneura lata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 84, Plate 5t) Erythroneura lata Beamer, 1932e:86 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) lata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura lata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, compressed, not extended to py- gofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Maryland, Montgomery Co., Glen Echo, 22 II 1931 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Cornus florida. Figure 83. E. nevadensis (Beamer). a – holotype; b–e – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3160 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 85. Eratoneura levecki (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 85, Plate 5u) Erythroneura levecki Hepner, 1966b:99 Eratoneura levecki Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 9 II 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus alba. 86. Eratoneura tantula (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 86, Plate 5v) Erythroneura tantula Knull, 1954b:171 Erythroneura whitcombi Hepner, 1975a:6, syn.n. Eratoneura tantula Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, Figure 84. E. lata (Beamer). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 85. E. levecki (Hepner). c–e – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 161 slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points more than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Scioto Co., 9 VI 1943 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: North of central USA. Host plants: ? Ulmus rubra. 87. Eratoneura beeri (Hepner, 1972) (Fig. 87, Plate 6a) Erythroneura beeri Hepner, 1972c:272 Eratoneura beeri Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus triangular, without sclero- tized connection to anal tube or pygofer appendages; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, White Co., Enfield, 13 IV 1960 (Ross & Cunningham), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus sp. Figure 86. E. tantula (Knull). Figure 87. E. beeri (Hepner). c–e – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3162 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 88. Eratoneura accita (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 88, Plate 6b) Erythroneura accita Knull, 1954b:170 Eratoneura accita Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:133 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe round- ed; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 12 IV 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Ohio. Host plants: Unknown. Notes: The genitalia of the holotype are mounded on a slide. 89. Eratoneura cera (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 89, Plate 6c) Erythroneura cera Hepner, 1966d:105 Eratoneura cera Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Jackson Co., Giant City State Park, on Acer sp., 27 VII 1951 (Richards & Sanderson), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Illinois. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 88. E. accita (Knull). a – paratype; c–d – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 163 90. Eratoneura rubraza (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 90, Plate 6d) Erythroneura rubraza Robinson, 1924c:291 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) rubraza Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura rubraza Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe angu- late; appendage simple, not extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ven- trad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, maculae near apex of clavus slightly enlarged, could form narrow transverse band not reaching lateral margins of wings. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Cherokee Co., 30 XII 1923 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Kansas. Host plants: Unknown. Figure 89. E. cera (Hepner). a–b – paratype; c–d – holotype. Figure 90. E. rubraza (Robinson). Vol. 39 Art.3164 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 91. Eratoneura affinis (Fitch, 1851) (Fig. 91, Plates 1a, 1e, 1f, 6e) Erythroneura affinis Fitch, 1851a:63 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) affinis Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura rubida Knull, 1954b:171, syn.n. (Plate 6e3) Erythroneura ferrosa Hepner, 1966a:83, syn.n. Erythroneura asymmetra Hepner, 1973a:186, syn.n. Erythroneura vulgaris Hepner, 1975a:4, syn.n. Eratoneura affinis Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.7–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin or extended beyond it. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended or almost extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection or compressed, denticulate distally, with or without lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, sometimes basal half of forewing darkened. Type locality: Holotype , USA, New York; “Allotype” by Beamer: , Kansas, Douglas Co., 13 IV 1924 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Ulmus rubra, U. americana, U. alata. Notes: The holotype of E. asymmetra Hepner has aberrant genitalia with an asymmetrical aedea- gus. E. vulgaris Hepner was described for the color variation without a crossband on the forewing, although the holotype of E. affinis Fitch does not have any crossbands, and the form with cross- bands is rare. 92. Eratoneura stephensoni (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 92, Plate 6f) Erythroneura stephensoni Beamer, 1931a:130 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) stephensoni Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura stephensoni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, Figure 91. E. affinis (Fitch). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 165 slightly curved in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Dorsum pale, whitish; orange maculae small. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Bowie Co., 16 VIII 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus phellos, Q. coccinea, Q. marilandica, Q. shumardii, Q. laurifolia, Q. alba, and other species of Quercus. 93. Eratoneura clavipes (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 93, Plate 6g) Erythroneura clavipes Beamer, 1931c:269 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) clavipes Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura clavipes Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 3.1–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, strongly curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft strongly curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 9 IX 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Ulmus rubra. Figure 92. E. stephensoni (Beamer). c – holotype. Figure 93. E. clavipes (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3166 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 94. Eratoneura retusa (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 94, Plate 6h) Erythroneura retusa Beamer, 1932c:48 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) retusa Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura retusa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with depressed apex, bent dorsad, without lateral lobes or processes. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Pasco Co., Lacoochee, 18 VIII 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus chapmanii, Q. stellata. 95. Eratoneura hymac (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 95, Plate 6i) Erythroneura hymac Robinson, 1924a:60 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) hymac Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura hymac Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, strongly curved inward in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus; maculae small. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Douglas Co., 20 IV 1922 (Lawson), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Cercis canadensis, Quercus macrocarpa. Figure 94. E. retusa (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 167 96. Eratoneura externa (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 96, Plate 6j) Erythroneura externa Beamer, 1931d:289 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) externa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura externa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, strongly curved inward in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, maculae small, often with red longitudinal stripe along vertex, pro-, and mesonotum, and spot near apex of clavus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 6 X 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. macrocarpa, Q. falcata, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on 6 X 1929, not on 6 XI 1929 as stated in the original publica- tion. Figure 95. E. hymac (Robinson). Figure 96. E. externa (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3168 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 97. Eratoneura brooki (Hepner, 1969) (Fig. 97, Plate 6k) Erythroneura brooki Hepner, 1969a:126 Eratoneura brooki Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 9 II 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: South central USA. Host plants: Unknown. Notes: The holotype was collected in State College, not in Starkville as stated in the original publication. 98. Eratoneura longa (Knull, 1955) (Fig. 98, Plate 6l) Erythroneura longa Knull, 1955a:245 Erythroneura arneri Hepner, 1969a:130, syn.n. (Plate 6l2) Eratoneura longa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, sometimes forewing with narrow reddish crossband. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Walker Co., Huntsville State Park, on Ulmus sp., 2 IV 1954 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: South central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus falcata, Q. pagoda, Q. stellata, Q. nigra, and other species of Quercus. Notes: E. arneri Hepner is a color variant with a crossband on the forewing. The holotype was collected on a non host plant species. Figure 97. E. brooki (Hepner). c–d – holotype; e – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 169 99. Eratoneura sebringensis (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 99, Plate 6m) Erythroneura sebringensis Hepner, 1966b:97 Eratoneura sebringensis Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Marion Co., Juniper Springs, on Quercus myrtifolia, 9 VI 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus myrtifolia, Q. chapmanii, and probably other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on Quercus myrtifolia, not on Q. chapmanii as stated in the original publication. Figure 98. E. longa (Knull). c–e – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 99. E. sebringensis (Hepner). c–e – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3170 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 100. Eratoneura parvipes (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 100, Plate 6n) Erythroneura parvipes Beamer, 1931b:242 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) parvipes Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura parvipes Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Style apex truncated, without third point. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Carya ovata, C. tomentosa, C. glabra. 101. Eratoneura calamitosa (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 101, Plate 6o) Erythroneura calamitosa Beamer, 1931b:241 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) calamitosa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura calamitosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Style apex truncated, without third point. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Juglans nigra. Notes: The holotype was collected on 26 XI 1927, not on 27 XI 1927 as stated in the original publication. Figure 100. E. parvipes (Beamer). c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 171 102. Eratoneura richardsi (Ross, 1953) (Fig. 102, Plate 6p) Erythroneura richardsi Ross, 1953b:189 Erythroneura scobyensis Hepner, 1966b:97, syn.n. Eratoneura richardsi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, curved near base and near apex in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes, apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., Grantsburg, on Quercus lyrata, 17 VIII 1951 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus palustris, Q. lyrata, Q. pagoda, and other species of Quercus. 103. Eratoneura marilandicae (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 103, Plate 6q) Erythroneura marilandicae Ross, 1957a:183 Eratoneura marilandicae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe Figure 101. E. calamitosa (Beamer). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 102. E. richardsi (Ross). e – paratype; a–d – from Ross (1953b). Vol. 39 Art.3172 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Morgan Co., Meredosia, on Quercus marilandica, 8 IX 1954 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus velutina, Q. marilandica, Q. imbricaria, Q. rubra, Q. shumardii, and other species of Quercus. 104. Eratoneura opulenta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 104, Plate 7a) Erythroneura opulenta Beamer, 1932c:48 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) opulenta Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura opulenta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, with maculae brigther in basal half of forewings. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Pasco Co., Lacoochee, on Quercus sp., 18 VIII 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus sp. Figure 103. E. marilandicae (Ross). c, e – holotype; a, b, d – from Ross (1957a). Figure 104. E. opulenta (Beamer). a, c, e – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 173 105. Eratoneura era (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 105, Plate 7b) Erythroneura maculata var. era McAtee, 1920a:299 Erythroneura univittata Robinson, 1924b:156, syn.n. Erythroneura era Beamer, 1932f:138 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) era Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura vinsoni Hepner, 1969a:129, syn.n. Erythroneura byersi Hepner, 1972c:271, syn.n. Eratoneura era Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point short toothlike or elongate, not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90° or less. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection or compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Forewing usually with narrow red crossband in basal half. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Virginia, Arlington Co., Maywood, 20 II 1916 (McAtee), (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Carya ovata, C. tomentosa, C leiodermis, and other species of Carya. Figure 105. E. era (McAtee). c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; d1–d2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; c1, d1 – holotype; c2 – holotype of E. univittata Robinson. Vol. 39 Art.3174 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 106. Eratoneura fergersoni (Hepner, 1969) (Fig. 106, Plate 7c) Erythroneura fergersoni Hepner, 1969a:130 Erythroneura johnsoni Hepner, 1972a:432, syn.n. Eratoneura fergersoni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, den- ticulate distally, with lateral lobes along aedeagal shaft, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Clinton Co., Posey, on Quercus bicolor, 24 IX 1953 (Ross & Evers), (INHS). distribution: North of central USA. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa, Q. bicolor, Q. prinus. 107. Eratoneura ellisi (Hepner, 1969) (Fig. 107, Plate 7d) Erythroneura ellisi Hepner, 1969a:129 Eratoneura ellisi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; pygofer appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Quercus phellos, 19 IX 1964 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus phellos, Q. laurifolia, Q. pagoda, Q. lyrata, Q. nigra, and other species of Quercus. Figure 106. E. fergersoni (Hepner). e1–e2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; c, e1 – paratype; b, d, e2 – holotype of E. johnsoni Hepner; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 175 108. Eratoneura acantha (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 108, Plate 7e) Erythroneura acantha Ross & DeLong, 1950a:296 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) acantha Young, 1952b:120 Erythroneura sethi Hepner, 1966b:100, syn.n. Eratoneura acantha Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:133 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ven- tral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Wayne Co., Fairfield, on Carya ovata, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, Q. velutina, Q. marilandica, Q. phellos, Q. stellata, Q. rubra, Q. shumardii, Q. nigra, Q. alba, Q. imbricaria, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on a non host plant species. Figure 107. E. ellisi (Hepner). a – from Hepner (unpublished); b – from Hepner (1969a). Figure 108. E. acantha (Ross & DeLong). b – holotype; c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; c2 – paratype of E. sethi Hepner; a – from Hepner (unpublished); c1, d, e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Vol. 39 Art.3176 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 109. Eratoneura interna (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 109, Plate 7f) Erythroneura interna Beamer, 1931d:285 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) interna Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura interna Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, strongly curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Cherokee Co., 1927, (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. myrtifolia, Q. chapmanii. 110. Eratoneura robusta (Knull, 1955) (Fig. 110, Plate 7g) Erythroneura robusta Knull, 1955a:245 Erythroneura sadleri Hepner, 1969a:132, syn.n. Eratoneura robusta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.6–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex longer than third; third point short toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Walker Co., Huntsville State Park, on Ulmus sp., 2 IV 1954 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: South central USA. Host plants: Ulmus sp. Figure 109. E. interna (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 177 111. Eratoneura metopia (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 111, Plate 7h) Erythroneura metopia Ross, 1957a:185 Eratoneura metopia Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved down- ward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with- out lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., Shawneetown, on Quercus imbricaria, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria, Q. velutina, and other species of Quercus. 112. Eratoneura patris (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 112, Plate 7i) Erythroneura patris Ross & DeLong, 1953a:89 Erythroneura chehawensis Hepner, 1966b:100, syn.n. Eratoneura patris Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, Figure 110. E. robusta (Knull). c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; a–c1, d, e – paratype; c2 – paratype of E. sadleri Hepner. Figure 111. E. metopia (Ross). a, b, d, e – from Ross (1957a); c – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3178 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally; without lateral lobes or pro- cesses; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Jackson Co., Grand Tower, on Quercus stellata, 7 X 1947 (Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. stellata, Q. nigra, Q. falcata, Q. palustris, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype of E. chehawensis Hepner is an abberant specimen. 113. Eratoneura econa (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 113, Plate 7j) Erythroneura econa Ross, 1957a:184 Eratoneura econa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, depressed in basal half and compressed in distal half, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Cumberland Co., Neoga, on Quercus imbricaria, 2 IX 1955 (Ross & Sanderson), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. Figure 112. E. patris (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Figure 113. E. econa (Ross). c, e – holotype; a, b, d – from Ross (1957a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 179 114. Eratoneura alicia (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 114, Plate 7k) Erythroneura alicia Ross, 1957a:185 Eratoneura alicia Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex longer than third; third point short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Mesonotum red; forewing with three red narrow crossbands. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Cumberland Co., Neoga, on Quercus imbricaria, 2 IX 1955 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. 115. Eratoneura zioni (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 115, Plate 7l) Erythroneura zioni Beamer, 1932d:71 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) zioni Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura zioni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe angulate; append- age simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, denticulate distally, with narrow lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae usually forming con- tinuous zigzag pattern, without crossbands. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Utah, Washington Co., Zion National Park, on Quercus sp., 13 VIII 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Utah. Host plants: Quercus sp. Figure 114. E. alicia (Ross). e – holotype; a, b, d – from Ross (1957a); c – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3180 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 116. Eratoneura greeni (Hepner, 1969) (Fig. 116, Plate 7m) Erythroneura greeni Hepner, 1969a:127 Eratoneura greeni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.6–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Highlands Co., Sebring, on Quercus sp., 28 XII 1960 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Florida. Host plants: Quercus sp. 117. Eratoneura lenta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 117, Plate 7n) Erythroneura lenta Beamer, 1932e:82 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) lenta Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura lenta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer Figure 115. E. zioni (Beamer). a–d – holotype; e – paratype. Figure 116. E. greeni (Hepner). a, d, e – paratype; c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 181 apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with large lateral lobes, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus phellos, Q. laurifolia, Q. rubra, Q. imbricaria, Q. nigra, Q. pagoda, and other species of Quercus. 118. Eratoneura gilesi (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 118, Plate 7o) Erythroneura gilesi Hepner, 1966b:97 Erythroneura colvardi Hepner, 1966b:95, syn.n. Erythroneura wisei Hepner, 1966b:97, syn.n. Erythroneura hamneri Hepner, 1969a:127, syn.n. Erythroneura maxwelli Hepner, 1972b:218, syn.n. Eratoneura gilesi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to or beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight or curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second and third points of style apex very short, toothlike. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slen- der in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Quercus pagoda, 8 VII 1964 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected in the State College, not in Noxubee Co. as stated in the origi- nal publication. The holotypes of E. colvardi Hepner and E. maxwelli Hepner are variants with the pygofer appendage short. Figure 117. E. lenta (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3182 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 119. Eratoneura maga (Knull, 1951) (Fig. 119, Plate 7p) Erythroneura maga Knull, 1951b:170 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) maga Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura maga Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point with wide base, elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Scioto Co., 9 VI 1943 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. lyrata, Q. falcata, Q. stellata, and other species of Quercus. Figure 118. E. gilesi (Hepner). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; e1–e2 – varia- tion of shape of the aedeagus; a1, b2, c, d, e2 – holotype; a2, b2 – var. colvardi Hepner. Figure 119. E. maga (Knull). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 183 120. Eratoneura igella (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 120, Plate 7q) Erythroneura igella Ross & DeLong, 1950a:295 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) igella Young, 1952b:120 Erythroneura albiquera Hepner, 1967b:62, syn.n. Eratoneura igella Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Pope Co., Bell Smith Springs, on Quercus sp., 16 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus stellata, Q. falcata, Q. pagoda, and other species of Quercus. 121. Eratoneura stannardi (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 121, Plate 7r) Erythroneura stannardi Hepner, 1967b:66 Eratoneura stannardi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Quercus palus- tris, 6 IX 1962 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus coccinea, Q. palustris, Q. rubra, and other species of Quercus. Figure 120. E. igella (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Vol. 39 Art.3184 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 122. Eratoneura trautmanae (Knull, 1945) (Fig. 122, Plate 7s) Erythroneura trautmanae Knull, 1945b:104 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) trautmanae Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura trautmanae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, apex curved upward in lateral view, widest at base, den- ticulate distally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with dorsal carina with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Michigan, Crawford Co., Hartwick Pines State Park, 17 VII, (Auten), (OSU). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Acer spicatum, A. pensylvanicum, and other species of Acer. Figure 121. E. stannardi (Hepner). a–e – holotype. Figure 122. E. trautmanae (Knull). c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 185 123. Eratoneura knighti (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 123, Plate 7t) Erythroneura knighti Beamer, 1932e:87 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) knighti Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura knighti Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; ap- pendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; aedeagal shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without process- es; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Story Co., Ames, 18 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Acer saccharum, and other species of Acer. 124. Eratoneura triangulata (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 124, Plate 7u) Erythroneura triangulata Beamer, 1931b:240 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) triangulata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura triangulata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age simple, compressed, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point with broad base, elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, round in ventral view, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., 31 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Carpinus caroliniana. Figure 123. E. knighti (Beamer). c–e – from Ross (1958a). Vol. 39 Art.3186 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 125. Eratoneura corylorubra (Knull, 1945) (Fig. 125, Plate 7v) Erythroneura corylorubra Knull, 1945b:108 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) corylorubra Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura corylorubra Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.4–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with broadened depressed apex sharply bent dorsad, without lateral lobes or processes. Forewing with oblique broad vitta forming zigzag pattern. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 17 IV 1938 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 124. E. triangulata (Beamer). b – from Hepner (unpublished); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Figure 125. E. corylorubra (Knull). c – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 187 126. Eratoneura fulleri (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 126, Plates 1g, 8a) Erythroneura fulleri Hepner, 1967a:19 Erythroneura patei Hepner, 1967a:19, syn.n. (Plate 8a2) Erythroneura weemsi Hepner, 1967a:19, syn.n. Eratoneura fulleri Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elon- gate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; aedeagal shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, triangular in ventral view, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Forewing usually with broad red crossband in basal half not reach- ing costal margin. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Hardin Co., Elizabethtown, on Acer saccharum, 2 IX 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Aesculus glabra. Notes: The holotype was collected on a non host plant species. 127. Eratoneura rubranotata (Beamer, 1927) (Fig. 127, Plate 8b) Erythroneura rubranotata Beamer, 1927a:30 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) rubranotata Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura rubranotata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, Figure 126. E. fulleri (Hepner). a, c–e – holotype; b – from Hepner (1967a). Vol. 39 Art.3188 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Pro- notum with bright red Y-shaped medial vitta; forewings without oblique vittae, with 2 narrow red crossbands not reaching lateral margins. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Atchison Co., 16 VII 1924 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Aesculus glabra. 128. Eratoneura citrosa (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 128, Plate 8c) Erythroneura citrosa Ross, 1956a:86 Eratoneura citrosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.6–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, slightly compressed basally, ex- tended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Marion Co., Salem, on Corylus americana, 22 IX 1948 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Corylus americana. Figure 127. E. rubranotata (Beamer). Figure 128. E. citrosa (Ross). b–c – holotype; a, d, e – from Ross (1956a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 189 129. Eratoneura clara (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 129, Plate 8d) Erythroneura clara Beamer, 1932g:161 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) clara Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura clara Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Cercis canadensis. 130. Eratoneura nimia (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 130, Plate 8e) Erythroneura nimia Knull, 1954b:171 Erythroneura spatulata Ross, 1956a:88 (prim.hom. of Erythroneura spatulata Beamer, 1930), syn.n. Erythroneura edeni Hepner, 1967a:20, syn.n. Erythroneura fagusae Hepner, 1967a:22, syn.n. Erythroneura ostryae Hepner, 1967a:23, syn.n. Eratoneura nimia Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 Erythroneura hepneri Dmitriev & Dietrich, 2006a:38 n.nov., syn.n. description: Length 2.4–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, de- pressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view, often slightly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 27 IX 1950 (Knull), (OSU). Figure 129. E. clara (Beamer). c – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3190 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Fagus grandifolia, Ostrya virginiana. Notes: The holotype is a large specimen, 3.2 mm (2.8 mm in the original publication), but the genitalia exactly match those of E. spatulata Ross. Probably the wrong body was associated with the holotype genitalia in the OSU collection. 131. Eratoneura flexibilis (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 131, Plate 8f) Erythroneura flexibilis Knull, 1949a:122 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) flexibilis Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura flexibilis Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved down- ward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Delaware Co., 18 III 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: North of central USA and northeastern USA. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 130. E. nimia (Knull). c – holotype; d1–d2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; a, d2, e – from Ross (1956a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 191 132. Eratoneura certa (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 132, Plate 8g) Erythroneura certa Beamer, 1932g:159 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) certa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura certa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.5–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point more than 2 times longer than distance between other 2 points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype, , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., 31 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Sassafras albidum. Notes: The holotype was collected on 31 III 1929, not on 30 III 1929 as stated in the original publication. Figure 131. E. flexibilis (Knull). a1–a2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; c – holotype; a2 – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3192 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 133. Eratoneura direpta (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 133, Plate 8h) Erythroneura direpta Knull, 1949a:125 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) direpta Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura callisoga Ross, 1956a:86, syn.n. Erythroneura brendae Hepner, 1967a:21, syn.n. Erythroneura hendersoni Hepner, 1967a:21, syn.n. Eratoneura direpta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.4–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 16 VII 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Carpinus caroliniana. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape of the pygofer appendage and aedeagus. Figure 132. E. certa (Beamer). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; c – holotype; b2 – from Hepner (unpubrished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 193 134. Eratoneura tersa (Knull, 1951) (Fig. 134, Plate 8i) Erythroneura tersa Knull, 1951b:172 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) tersa Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura tersa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 12 IV 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Aesculus sp., Carpinus caroliniana, Ulmus alata, Ostrya virginiana. Figure 133. E. direpta (Knull). a – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a–b – from Ross (1956a); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Figure 134. E. tersa (Knull). c – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3194 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 135. Eratoneura luculenta (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 135, Plate 8j) Erythroneura luculenta Knull, 1949a:124 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) luculenta Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura luculenta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3.2–3.4 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with- out lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arizona, Coconino Co., Oak Creek Canyon, 1 VIII 1938 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Arizona. Host plants: Unknown. 136. Eratoneura fausta (Knull, 1951) (Fig. 136, Plate 8k) Erythroneura fausta Knull, 1951b:172 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) fausta Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura fausta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points. Angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 20 VI 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Acer saccharum. Figure 135. E. luculenta (Knull). a1, c–e – holotype; a2 – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 195 137. Eratoneura bella (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 137, Plate 8l) Erythroneura maculata var. bella McAtee, 1920a:300 Erythroneura bella Beamer, 1932f:136 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) bella Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura bella Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinu- ate in dorsal view, curved downward distally in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with broken oblique vittae, with crossband, not reaching lateral margins and bases of wings. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Maryland, Montgomery Co., Plummers Island, 21 XII 1913 (McAtee), (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Figure 136. E. fausta (Knull). c – holotype. Figure 137. E. bella (McAtee). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3196 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 138. Eratoneura coxi (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 138, Plate 8n) Erythroneura coxi Ross & DeLong, 1950a:295 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) coxi Young, 1952b:120 Eratoneura coxi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.5–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Pennsylvania, Erie Co., North East, on Rubus sp., 14 X 1949 (Cox), (INHS). distribution: North central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Rubus sp. 139. Eratoneura torella (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 139, Plate 8m) Erythroneura torella Robinson, 1924b:156 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) torella Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura torella Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, with- out processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Cherokee Co., 30 XII 1923 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Notes: The holotype is female, not male as stated in the original publication. Figure 138. E. coxi (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 197 140. Eratoneura tumida (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 140, Plate 8o) Erythroneura tumida Knull, 1954b:173 Eratoneura tumida Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded. Pygofer appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 45°. Ae- deagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex broad- ened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 4 V 1950 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: North of central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: ?Quercus alba. 141. Eratoneura glicilla (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 141, Plate 8p) Erythroneura glicilla Ross, 1956a:86 Erythroneura loriae Hepner, 1967b:70, syn.n. Eratoneura glicilla Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in Figure 139. E. torella (Robinson). Figure 140. E. tumida (Knull). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3198 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, tooth- like; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slen- der in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Union Co., Jonesboro, on Carpinus caroliniana, 5 VI 1951 (Ross & Richards), (INHS). distribution: South central USA. Host plants: Unknown, the holotype was collected on Carpinus caroliniana. 142. Eratoneura morgani (DeLong, 1916) (Fig. 142, Plates 1b, 8q) Typhlocyba morgani DeLong, 1916a:104 Empoa querci var. morgani Van Duzee, 1917b:709 Erythroneura morgana DeLong, 1918b:234 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) morgani Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura morgani Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 3–3.4 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded. Pygofer appendage simple, narrowing near apex, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Pronotum with dark brown posterior margin, me- sonotum with dark brown lateral triangles; forewing with dark brown crossband in distal half and reddish maculae. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Tennessee, Montgomery Co., Clarksville, 22 VII 1915 (Mor- gan), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Figure 141. E. glicilla (Ross). c – holotype; a, d, e – from Ross (1956a); b – from Hepner (1967b). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 199 143. Eratoneura arta (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 143, Plate 8r) Erythroneura arta Beamer, 1931d:287 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) arta Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura arta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, White Co., 31 III 1929 (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. 144. Eratoneura hymettana (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 144, Plate 8s) Erythroneura hymettana Knull, 1949a:124 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) hymettana Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura rubrarta Hepner, 1967b:66, syn.n. Eratoneura hymettana Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell Figure 142. E. morgani (DeLong). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 143. E. arta (Beamer). c – holotype. Vol. 39 Art.3200 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, tooth- like; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Mesonotum with dark brown apex; forewings without oblique vittae, with pale brown crossband in basal half, and reddish crossband consisting of numerous small specks distally. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 11 IV 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. 145. Eratoneura lawsoni (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 145, Plate 9a) Erythroneura lawsoni Robinson, 1924a:59 Erythroneura mediana Robinson, 1924b:156 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) lawsoni Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura dura Knull, 1954b:170, syn.n. Erythroneura natchezensis Hepner, 1967b:70, syn.n. Eratoneura lawsoni Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus triangular, without sclerotized connection to anal tube or pygofer appendages; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, New York, Tompkins Co., Ithaca, VII 1921, (Lawson), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Platanus occidentalis. Figure 144. E. hymettana (Knull). a–e – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 201 146. Eratoneura continua (Knull & Auten, 1937) (Fig. 146, Plate 9b) Erythroneura continua Knull & Auten, 1937a:578 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) continua Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura continua Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Georgia, DeKalb Co., Decatur, McCurdy’s Pond, 14 IV 1934 (Auten), (OSU). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Georgia. Host plants: Unknown. 147. Eratoneura valida (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 147, Plate 9c) Erythroneura valida Knull, 1954b:174 Eratoneura valida Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, wid- Figure 145. E. lawsoni (Robinson). b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 146. E. continua (Knull & Auten). Vol. 39 Art.3202 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points or as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 4 V 1950 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus spp. 148. Eratoneura pamelae (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 148, Plate 9d) Erythroneura pamelae Hepner, 1967b:67 Eratoneura pamelae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, tooth- like; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Quercus pagoda, 8 VII 1964 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, Q. stellata, Q. velutina, and other species of Quercus. Figure 147. E. valida (Knull). c – holotype. Figure 148. E. pamelae (Hepner). b – from Hepner (1967b). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 203 149. Eratoneura protuma (Ross, 1957) (Fig. 149, Plate 9e) Erythroneura protuma Ross, 1957a:188 Eratoneura protuma Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike. Third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft strongly curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Ogle Co., Oregon, on Quercus rubra var. ambigua, 27 IX 1956 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: North of central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus alba, Q. rubra var. ambigua. 150. Eratoneura havana (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 150, Plate 9f) Erythroneura havana Ross & DeLong, 1953a:90 Eratoneura havana Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points. Angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft slightly sinuate and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Mason Co., Havana, 2 VII 1934 (DeLong & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus marilandica. Figure 149. E. protuma (Ross). e – holotype; a, c, d – from Ross (1957a). Vol. 39 Art.3204 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 151. Eratoneura gemoides (Ross, 1953) (Fig. 151, Plate 9g) Erythroneura gemoides Ross, 1953b:190 Erythroneura douglasi Hepner, 1967b:60, syn.n. Eratoneura gemoides Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike. Third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., Grantsburg, on Quercus palustris, 31 VIII 1951 (Richards & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus palustris, Q. lyrata, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quercus. 152. Eratoneura gemina (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 152, Plate 9i) Erythroneura maculata var. gemina McAtee, 1920a:301 Erythroneura comes var. gemina Leonard, 1928a: 175 Erythroneura gemina Beamer, 1931a:131 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) gemina Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura nigriquera Hepner, 1967b:60, syn.n. Erythroneura lyriquera Hepner, 1967b:61, syn.n. Erythroneura reedi Hepner, 1967b:61, syn.n. Eratoneura gemina Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 Figure 150. E. havana (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Figure 151. E. gemoides (Ross). e – paratype; a–d – from Ross (1953b). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 205 description: Length 2.7–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage sim- ple, extended to pygofer apex or beyond it, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, District of Columbia, Virginia side, 15 VI 1902, (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus nigra, Q. lyrata, Q. phellos, Q. pagoda, and other species of Quercus. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the length of the pygofer appendage (Fig. 152a) and shape of the aedeagus. 153. Eratoneura malaca (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 153, Plate 9h) Erythroneura Knull, 1949a:126 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) malaca Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura malaca Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Color- ation usual for genus. Figure 152. E. gemina (McAtee). a1–a2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; a1 – holotype of E. nigriquera Hepner; a2 – holotype of E. reedi Hepner; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3206 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Highland Co., 6 VI 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Ohio. Host plants: Unknown. 154. Eratoneura penesica (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 154, Plate 9j) Erythroneura penesica Beamer, 1931c:269 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) penesica Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura penisca Fattig, 1955a:37, missp. Erythroneura krameri Hepner, 1967b:67, syn.n. Eratoneura penesica Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base; second point of style apex very short, toothlike. Third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Carya tomentosa, C. ovata, C. glabra, C. leiodermis, and other species of Carya. Notes: The holotype of E. krameri Hepner has the aedeagus with poorly developed lateral lobes. Figure 153. E. malaca (Knull). Figure 154. E. penesica (Beamer). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 207 155. Eratoneura parallela (McAtee, 1924) (Fig. 155, Plate 9k) Erythroneura maculata var. parallela McAtee, 1924c:38 Erythroneura parallela Beamer, 1931b:243 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) parallela Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura parallela Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.5–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, den- ticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with prea- trium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, ovoid in ventral view, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae usully forming continuous zigzag pattern; abdomen with dark dorsum. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Massachusetts, Middlesex Co., Lexington, 28 IX 1920, (USNM). distribution: North central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Comptonia peregrina. 156. Eratoneura severini (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 156, Plate 9l) Erythroneura severini Knull, 1949a:125 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) severini Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura severini Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate at apex. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or distal processes; apex blunt in ventral view, slightly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus. Figure 155. E. parallela (McAtee). b–e – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3208 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Type locality: Holotype , USA, South Dakota, Fall River Co., Hot Springs, 17 IX 1919, (OSU). distribution: South Dakota. Host plants: Unknown. 157. Eratoneura claroides (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 167, Plate 9m) Erythroneura claroides Hepner, 1967a:17 Erythroneura kuiterti Hepner, 1967a:17, syn.n. Eratoneura claroides Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygo- fer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point more than 2 times as long as distance between other 2 points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; aedeagal shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 4 III 1962 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: South central USA. Host plants: Unknown. Notes: The holotype was collected on 4 III 1962, not on 4 III 1961 as stated in the original publi- cation. Figure 156. E. severini (Knull). Figure 157. E. claroides (Hepner). e – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished); b – from Hep- ner (1967a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 209 158. Eratoneura lunata (McAtee, 1924) (Fig. 158, Plate 9n) Erythroneura lunata McAtee, 1924e:41 Erythroneura septima Beamer, 1927a:30, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) lunata Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura lunata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad or larger, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Dorsum whitish with brown color pattern; mesonotum pale, with dark lateral triangles and apex; forewings with brown continuous zigzag pattern. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Champaign Co., Urbana, tree trunk, 11 XI 1915, (INHS). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. alba, and other species of Quercus. 159. Eratoneura adunca (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 159, Plate 9o) Erythroneura adunca Beamer, 1932c:46 Erythroneura simplex Knull & Auten, 1937a:575 (sec.hom. of Zygina blandula var. simplex Ferra- ri, 1882a), syn.n. Erythroneura ordinaria Knull & Auten, 1938b:651, n.nov. (prim.hom. of Erythroneura ordinaria Ribaut, 1936b), syn.n. Erythroneura perplexa Knull, 1944b:123, n.nov., syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) adunca Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura adunca Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.6–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, Figure 158. E. lunata (McAtee). e – holotype of E. septima Beamer; a–b – from Hepner (unpub- lished). Vol. 39 Art.3210 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft with apex curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, District of Columbia, Rock Creek Park, Washington D.C., 31 XII 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quercus. 160. Eratoneura curta (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 160, Plate 9p) Erythroneura curta Beamer, 1932e:86 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) curta Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura curta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.7–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdomi- nal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygo- fer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, about as long as distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Iowa, Clayton Co., 19 IV 1930 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus alba. Figure 159. E. adunca (Beamer). c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; c1 – holotype; c2 – holo- type of E. perplexa Knull; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 160. E. curta (Beamer). c–d – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 211 161. Eratoneura ballista (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 161, Plate 9q) Erythroneura ballista Beamer, 1932e:84 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) ballista Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura ballista Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.5–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, strongly sinuate in dorsal view, strongly curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft strongly curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Lawrence Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Prunus lanata, P. persica. 162. Eratoneura rostrata (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 162, Plate 9r) Erythroneura rostrata Beamer, 1931c:270 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) rostrata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura rostrata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.6–2.7 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight or curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft strongly curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, den- ticulate distally, with dorsal carina, without lateral lobes or processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Prunus lanata, P. virginiana. Figure 161. E. ballista (Beamer). c – holotype; a, b, e – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3212 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 163. Eratoneura penerostrata (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 163, Plate 9s) Erythroneura penerostrata Beamer, 1932e:85 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) penerostrata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura penerostrata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.5–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, smooth, with dorsal carina, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arkansas, Searcy Co., Marshall, 22 III 1931 (Anderson), (KSEM). distribution: South central USA. Host plants: Ostrya virginiana. Figure 162. E. rostrata (Beamer). c–d – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 163. E. penerostrata (Beamer). c–d – holotype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 213 164. Eratoneura emquu (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 164, Plate 9t) Erythroneura emquu Ross & DeLong, 1953a:88 Eratoneura emquu Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygo- fer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex trun- cate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Taylor Co., Perry, on Myrica cerifera, 17 XII 1949 (Stannard et. al.), (INHS). distribution: Southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus nigra, Q. phellos, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on a non host plant species. 165. Eratoneura trivittata (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 165, Plate 9u) Erythroneura trivittata Robinson, 1924a:59 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) trivittata Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura trivittata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.9–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus triangular, without sclerotized connection to anal tube or pygofer appendages; preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Mesonotum dark brown; forewings without oblique vittae, with 3 red narrow cross- bands. Figure 164. E. emquu (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Vol. 39 Art.3214 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Type locality: Holotype , USA, Missouri, Jackson Co., Kansas City, dry leaves, 1 XII 1901 (Rogers), (KSEM). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. 166. Eratoneura anseri (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 166, Plate 9v) Erythroneura anseri Hepner, 1966d:103 Eratoneura anseri Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, usually pale. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, on Carya leiodermis, 19 VIII 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Carya glabra, C. tomentosa, C. leiodermis, and other species of Carya. Figure 165. E. trivittata (Robinson). a, c, d – from Ross (1958a); b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 166. E. anseri (Hepner). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 215 167. Eratoneura stoveri (Ross & DeLong, 1950) (Fig. 167, Plate 10a) Erythroneura stoveri Ross & DeLong, 1950a:296 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) stoveri Young, 1952b:120 Erythroneura wiyguli Hepner, 1966d:103, syn.n. Eratoneura stoveri Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preat- rium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad near apex, slender in lateral view, round in crossec- tion, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus; forewing often with red spot in distal part of clavus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Clark Co., Rocky Branch Creek, Oliver, 22 IV 1949 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Carya tomentosa, Ulmus rubra, U. americana. 168. Eratoneura campora (Robinson, 1924) (Fig. 168, Plate 9w) Erythroneura campora Robinson, 1924a:59 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) campora Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura sabita Sinha & Beamer, 1954a:105, syn.n. Erythroneura larryi Hepner, 1966a:89, syn.n. Erythroneura codyi Hepner, 1966d:101, syn.n. Erythroneura accicurta Hepner, 1966d:106, syn.n. Erythroneura brazzeli Hepner, 1966d:106, syn.n. Erythroneura compora Metcalf, 1968a:1069, missp. Erythroneura curtoides Hepner, 1972c:272, syn.n. Erythroneura mariquera Hepner, 1973a:186, syn.n. Eratoneura campora Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 Figure 167. E. stoveri (Ross & DeLong). a–e – from Ross & DeLong (1950a). Vol. 39 Art.3216 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Douglas Co., X 1923, (Robinson), (KSEM). distribution: USA, southern Canada. Host plants: Ulmus alata, U. americana, U. rubra, Ilex decidua. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape of the pygofer appendage, style, and aedeagus (Fig. 168). E. sabita Sinha & Beamer was by mistake originally placed to the Erythroneura obliqua species group and latter transferred to the genus Erythridula (Sinha & Beamer, 1954a; Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a). 169. Eratoneura spinifera (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 169, Plate 10b) Erythroneura spinifera Beamer, 1931b:240 Erythroneura compressa Knull & Auten, 1937a:573, syn.n. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) spinifera Young, 1952b:87 Erythroneura caddoensis Hepner, 1966b:100, syn.n. Eratoneura spinifera Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 Figure 168. E. campora (Robinson). c1–c2 – variation of shape of the style; d1–e2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; c1 – holotype; c2, d2, e2 – holotype of E. accicurta Hepner. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 217 description: Length 2.7–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S ab- dominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex broadened in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Leavenworth Co., 28 IV 1928 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA. Host plants: Crataegus sp. 170. Eratoneura comoides (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 170, Plate 10c) Erythroneura comoides Ross & DeLong, 1953a:90 Eratoneura comoides Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae forming continuous zigzag pattern. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Florida, Levy Co., Chiefland, on Quercus myrtifolia, 17 XII 1949 (Stannard), (INHS). distribution: South of central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus nigra, Q. phellos, and other species of Quercus. Figure 169. E. spinifera (Beamer). c – paratype; a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 170. E. comoides (Ross & DeLong). from Ross & DeLong (1953a). Vol. 39 Art.3218 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 171. Eratoneura confirmata (McAtee, 1924) (Fig. 171, Plate 10d) Erythroneura maculata var. confirmata McAtee, 1924c:37 Erythroneura mitella McAtee, 1926c:132 Erythroneura confirmata Beamer, 1932f:134 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) confirmata Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura confirmata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.7–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Forewing with red zigzag pattern. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Virginia, Chain Bridge, 23 IV 1922 (Malloch). distribution: North central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. 172. Eratoneura phellos (Ross & DeLong, 1953) (Fig. 172, Plate 10e) Erythroneura phellos Ross & DeLong, 1953a:90 Eratoneura phellos Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Massac Co., Mermet, on Quercus phellos, 20 IX 1950 (Ross & Evers), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus phellos. Figure 171. E. confirmata (McAtee). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 219 173. Eratoneura bigemina (McAtee, 1924) (Fig. 173, Plate 10f) Typhlocyba comes var. apicalis DeLong, 1916a:108 (sec.hom. of Zygina apicalis Nawa, 1913a) Erythroneura maculata var. bigemina McAtee, 1920a:300 Erythroneura maculata var. begemina McAtee, 1924d:133, missp. Erythroneura bigemina Beamer, 1932f:143 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) bigemina Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura masonae Knull, 1954b:171, syn.n. Erythroneura bigemmina Fattig, 1955a:36, missp. Erythroneura meadi Hepner, 1966a:79, syn.n. Erythroneura hibernia Hepner, 1966a:83, syn.n. Erythroneura rossi Hepner, 1966a:85, syn.n. Erythroneura reiteri Hepner, 1966a:87, syn.n. Erythroneura billi Hepner, 1966a:88, syn.n. Erythroneura patriciae Hepner, 1966a:88, syn.n. Erythroneura lillianae Hepner, 1966a:89, syn.n. Erythroneura robinsoni Hepner, 1966a:89, syn.n. Eratoneura bigemina Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.7–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in Figure 172. E. phellos (Ross & DeLong). a – paratype; d1–d2 – variation of shape of the aedeagus; b, c, d2, e – from Ross & Delong (1953a). Vol. 39 Art.3220 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Maryland, Montgomery Co., Plummers Island, 20 VIII 1914 (McAtee), (USNM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Carya tomentosa, Ulmus alata, U. rubra, U. americana. Notes: Taxa here treated as synonyms appear to represent intraspecific variation in the shape of the pygofer appendage, style, and aedeagus (Fig. 173). 174. Eratoneura mensa (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 174, Plate 10g) Erythroneura mensa Beamer, 1931d:287 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) mensa Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura mensa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 3.2–3.4 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus rubra var. ambigua, Q. alba. Figure 173. E. bigemina (McAtee). d1–e3 – variation fo shape of the aedeagus; d2, – holotype; e2 – holotype of E. billi Hepner; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 221 175. Eratoneura basilaris (Say, 1825) (Fig. 175, Plate 10h) Tettigonia basilaris Say, 1825a:344 Erythroneura basillaris Fitch, 1851a:63, missp. Erythroneura basalis Glover, 1877a:33, missp. Erythroneura basalaris Lawson, 1920a:51, missp. Erythroneura (Eratoneura) basilaris Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura daltonorum Hepner, 1966a:81, syn.n. Erythroneura youngi Hepner, 1966a:87, syn.n. Erythroneura custeri Hepner, 1966a:89, syn.n. Erythroneura rubulna Hepner, 1972a:433, syn.n. Erythroneura wolcottensis Hepner, 1973a:185, syn.n. Eratoneura basilaris Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, twisted at middle, extended to pygofer apex or extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Neotype , USA, Kansas, Anderson Co., 26 XI 1927 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Ulmus americana, U. rubra, U. alata, Ilex decidua. Figure 174. E. mensa (Beamer). a – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 175. E. basilaris (Say). Vol. 39 Art.3222 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 176. Eratoneura micheneri (Hepner, 1972) (Fig. 176, Plate 10i) Erythroneura micheneri Hepner, 1972c:271 Eratoneura micheneri Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Fore- wing usually with red spot near middle. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Oktibbeha Co., State College, 18 II 1962 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Unknown. 177. Eratoneura lucyae (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 177, Plate 10j) Erythroneura lucyae Hepner, 1966a:81 Erythroneura bainteri Hepner, 1972c:271, syn.n. Eratoneura lucyae Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex well developed; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Mississippi, Noxubee Co., on Quercus lyrata, 27 VI 1963 (Hep- ner), (INHS). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus lyrata. Figure 176. E. micheneri (Hepner). c – holotype; d–e – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 223 178. Eratoneura guicei (Hepner, 1972) (Fig. 178, Plate 10k) Erythroneura guicei Hepner, 1972c:269 Eratoneura guicei Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, compressed, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate ventrally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Lee Co., Amboy, on Quercus macrocarpa, 27 IX 1956 (Stannard & Ross), (INHS). distribution: North central USA. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa. Figure 177. E. lucyae (Hepner). b – paratype; c–e – holotype of E. bainteri Hepner; a – from Hep- ner (unpublished). Figure 178. E. guicei (Hepner). Vol. 39 Art.3224 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 179. Eratoneura lundi (Hepner, 1967) (Fig. 179, Plate 10l) Erythroneura lundi Hepner, 1967a:22 Eratoneura lundi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.5–2.6 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, nar- row, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft sinuate and broad in lateral view, depressed, round in ventral view, denticulate distally; with- out lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Tennessee, Overton Co., Timothy, on Ostrya virginiana, 1 IX 1963 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in Tennessee. Host plants: Ostrya virginiana. 180. Eratoneura marra (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 180, Plate 10m) Erythroneura marra Beamer, 1932g:160 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) marra Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura marra Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.6–2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Dorsal apodeme of aedeagus with distinct V-shaped ligaments, connected to pygofer appendages; preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, slender in lateral view, depressed, smooth, with long dorsal distal lobe, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex broadened in ventral view, strongly bent dorsad. Coloration usual for genus, with very small maculae. Type locality: Holotype , USA, District of Columbia, Washington D.C., Zool. Park, 1930, (Oman), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Hamamelis virginiana. Figure 179. E. lundi (Hepner). c–e – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished); b – from Hepner (1967a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 225 181. Eratoneura staminea (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 181, Plate 10n) Erythroneura staminea Knull, 1954b:171 Eratoneura staminea Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, strongly curved inward and downward distally, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium shorter than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed and ovoid in ventral view, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes along entire length of shaft; without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 4 V 1950 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central and southeastern USA. Host plants: Quercus pagoda, Q. falcata, Q. velutina, Q. marilandica, and other species of Quer- cus. Figure 180. E. marra (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 181. E. staminea (Knull). a – paratype; c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3226 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 182. Eratoneura unca (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 182, Plate 10o) Erythroneura unca Knull, 1954b:174 Eratoneura unca Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; append- age simple, compressed, extended to pygofer apex, straight or very slightly curved in dorsal view, strongly curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate dorsally. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus except forewings usually with darkened basal half. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 12 V 1947 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA, south central Canada. Host plants: Ulmus americana, Ilex decidua. 183. Eratoneura dumosa (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 183, Plate 10p) Erythroneura dumosa Beamer, 1932a:13 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) dumosa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura dumosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.9–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer Figure 182. E. unca (Knull). a1–b2 – variation of shape of the pygofer appendage; c – holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 227 apex, distinctly sinuate distally in dorsal view, curved upward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus, orange maculae large. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus shumardii, Q. alba, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on 30 III 1929, not on 3 III 1929 as stated in the original publi- cation. 184. Eratoneura ligata (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 184, Plate 10q) Erythroneura ligata McAtee, 1920a:301 Erythroneura ligata var. allecta McAtee, 1920a:302, syn.n. (Plate 10q2) Erythroneura ligata var. pupillata McAtee, 1924e:42, syn.n. (Plate 10q3) Erythroneura (Eratoneura) ligata Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura ligata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft curved ventrad near apex, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with nar- row lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Forewings with oblique vittae forming continuous zigzag pattern, without crossbands; meso- and metanotum often with brown medial part. Type locality: Holotype , USA, District of Columbia, Washington D.C., 8 VII 1907 (Palmer), (USNM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Quercus alba, Q. macrocarpa. Figure 183. E. dumosa (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3228 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 185. Eratoneura contracta (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 185, Plate 10r) Erythroneura contracta Beamer, 1931a:130 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) contracta Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura contracta Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:135 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with angulate lateral lobes along entire length of shaft, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Douglas Co., 1927, (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and northeastern USA. Host plants: Ulmus rubra, U. americana, U. alata, Ilex decidua. Figure 184. E. ligata (McAtee). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 185. E. contracta (Beamer). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 229 186. Eratoneura vittata (Knull & Auten, 1937) (Fig. 186, Plate 11a) Erythroneura vittata Knull & Auten, 1937a:577 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) vittata Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura winslowensis Hepner, 1966a:85, syn.n. Eratoneura vittata Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:139 description: Length 2.8–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved dorsad, broad in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with large lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Georgia, DeKalb Co., Decatur, 17 IV 1934 (Auten), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Unknown, probably Quercus. 187. Eratoneura biramosa (Beamer, 1941) (Fig. 187, Plate 11b) Erythroneura biramosa Beamer, 1941a:18 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) biramosa Young, 1952b:86 Eratoneura biramosa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, extended beyond 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal and lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, depressed, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, New Mexico, Roosevelt Co., Kenna, 16 VII 1936 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: The species is known only from the type locality in New Mexico. Host plants: Unknown. Figure 186. E. vittata (Knull & Auten). c – holotype; a – from Hepner (unpublished). Vol. 39 Art.3230 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 188. Eratoneura smithi (Ross, 1956) (Fig. 188, Plate 11c) Erythroneura smithi Ross, 1956a:90 Erythroneura wilsoni Hepner, 1966d:106, syn.n. Eratoneura smithi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elon- gate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and broad in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with narrow lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Morgan Co., Meredosia, on Quercus marilandica, 8 IX 1954 (Ross & Stannard), (INHS). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus marilandica, Q. prinus, Q. shumardii. 189. Eratoneura prolixa (Knull, 1949) (Fig. 189, Plate 11d) Erythroneura prolixa Knull, 1949a:126 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) prolixa Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura prolixa Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:137 description: Length 2.8–3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, Figure 187. E. biramosa (Beamer). a–e – paratype. Figure 188. E. smithi (Ross). e – holotype; a–d – from Ross (1956a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 231 distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, compressed, denticulate distally, with small lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex acuminate in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Pickaway Co., 20 II, (Caldwell), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus michauxii, Q. macrocarpa, Q. lyrata, Q. muehlenbergii, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected in Pickaway Co., on 20 II, by Caldwell, not in Hocking Co., on 5 V, by Knull as stated in the original publication. 190. Eratoneura teres (Beamer, 1931) (Fig. 190, Plate 11e) Erythroneura teres Beamer, 1931c:268 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) teres Young, 1952b:88 Erythroneura alevra Ross, 1956a:89, syn.n. Erythroneura bicurvata Hepner, 1973a:184, syn.n. Eratoneura teres Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, strongly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: ? Carya glabra. Figure 189. E. prolixa (Knull). c – holotype; b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 190. E. teres (Beamer). c – from Ross (1956a). Vol. 39 Art.3232 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 191. Eratoneura amethica (Ross, 1957) (Fgi. 191, Plate 11f) Erythroneura amethica Ross, 1957a:186 Eratoneura amethica Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell about 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex well developed; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; without lateral lobes or processes; apex truncate in ventral view. Mesonotum entirely dark brown; forewing with 3 narrow red crossbands. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Gallatin Co., Shawneetown, on Quercus imbricaria, 14 VII 1948 (Mills & Ross), (INHS). distribution: Illinois. Host plants: Quercus imbricaria. 192. Eratoneura tenuitas (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 192, Plate 11g) Erythroneura tenuitas Knull, 1954b:173 Erythroneura norica Ross, 1956a:88, syn.n. Erythroneura pitrei Hepner, 1973a:184, syn.n. Eratoneura tenuitas Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 2.8–2.9 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, wid- est at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points about 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in cros- section, denticulate distally, without small lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Texas, Bastrop Co., Bastrop State Park, 26 III 1950 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Quercus marilandica. Figure 191. E. amethica (Ross). a–d – from Ross (1957a); e – from Ross (1958a). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 233 193. Eratoneura haysensis (Hepner, 1966) (Fig. 193, Plate 11h) Erythroneura haysensis Hepner, 1966a:79 Erythroneura paulae Hepner, 1966a:81, syn.n. Eratoneura haysensis Dietrich & Dmit- riev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft slender, straight or curved ventrad, round in crossection, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Kansas, Ellis Co., Hays, on Ulmus sp., 28 VIII 1964 (Hepner), (INHS). distribution: Central USA, south central Canada. Host plants: Quercus macrocarpa, Q. michauxii, Q. lyrata, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype was collected on a non host plant species. Figure 192. E. tenuitas (Knull). e – holotype of E. norica Ross; a, c, d – from Ross (1956a); b – from Hepner (unpublished). Figure 193. E. haysensis (Hepner). b – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3234 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 194. Eratoneura geronimoi (Knull, 1945) (Fig. 194, Plate 11i) Erythroneura geronimoi Knull, 1945b:108 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) geronimoi Young, 1952b:88 Eratoneura geronimoi Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 3–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes small, narrow, extended dorsomesad. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, slightly curved in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Arizona, Cochise Co., Chiricahua Mountains, on Quercus sp., 14 IX 1938 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Arizona. Host plants: Quercus sp. 195. Eratoneura macra (Beamer, 1932) (Fig. 195, Plate 11j) Erythroneura macra Beamer, 1932a:15 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) macra Young, 1952b:87 Eratoneura macra Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:136 description: Length 2.9–3.2 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe angulate; appendage simple, extended beyond pygo- fer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, straight in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point elongate, longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; with lateral lobes at base, without processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Illinois, Johnson Co., 30 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central and eastern USA, southeastern Canada. Host plants: Salix bebbiana, Acer saccharum, and other species of Salix and Acer. Notes: The holotype was collected on 30 III 1929, not on 3 III 1929 as stated in the original publi- cation. Figure 194. E. geronimoi (Knull). a–e – paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 235 196. Eratoneura socia (Knull, 1954) (Fig. 196, Plate 11k) Erythroneura socia Knull, 1954b:171 Erythroneura deformata Hepner, 1966a:85, syn.n. Erythroneura parisensis Hepner, 1972a:431, syn.n. Eratoneura socia Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:138 description: Length 3–3.1 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apo- demes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended to pygofer apex, distinctly sinuate in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base, denticulate. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium longer than shaft; shaft curved ventrad, slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally; without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Coloration usual for genus. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Ohio, Hocking Co., 12 IV 1945 (Knull), (OSU). distribution: Central USA. Host plants: Unknown. Figure 195. E. macra (Beamer). a–b – from Hepner (unpublished); c–e – from Ross (1958a). Figure 196. E. socia (Knull). a1–a2 – variation of shape of pygofer appendage; a1 – holotype; c–d – paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3236 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 197. Eratoneura accola (McAtee, 1920) (Fig. 197, Plate 11l) Erythroneura maculata var. accola McAtee, 1920a:299 Erythroneura accola Beamer, 1931d:289 Erythroneura (Eratoneura) accola Young, 1952b:86 Erythroneura starkvillensis Hepner, 1966d:103, syn.n. Eratoneura accola Dietrich & Dmitriev, 2006a:134 description: Length 3.1–3.3 mm. Forewing outer apical cell elongate, more than 2X as long as wide. 2S abdominal apodemes large, broad, reaching 3S posterior margin. Pygofer lobe rounded; appendage simple, extended beyond pygofer apex, straight in dorsal view, curved downward in lateral view, widest at base. Second point of style apex very short, toothlike; third point not longer than half distance between other two points; angle between basal and third points less than 90°. Aedeagus with preatrium about as long as shaft; shaft straight and slender in lateral view, round in crossection, denticulate distally, without lateral lobes or processes; apex blunt in ventral view. Crown, pro- and mesonotum with red median stripe; clavus with red spot near apex. Type locality: Holotype , USA, Maryland, Montgomery Co., Plummers Island, 21 XII 1913 (McAtee), (USNM); “Allotype” by Beamer , Illinois, Gallatin Co., 31 III 1929 (Beamer), (KSEM). distribution: Central or eastern USA. Host plants: Quercus bicolor, Q. falcata, Q. macrocarpa, and other species of Quercus. Notes: The holotype could not be located and was not studied. Figure 197. E. accola (McAtee). ACKNoWlEdGMENTS For lending specimens, we are grateful to Nor- man Penny (California Academy of Sciences), K.G.A. Hamilton (Canadian National Collec- tion, Ottawa), Boris Kondratieff (Colorado State University), Richard Brown (Mississippi State University), Stuart McKamey (National Museum of Natural History, Washington), Luciana Musetti and Creighton Freeman (Ohio State University), and Zachary Falin (Univer- sity of Kansas). Stuart McKamey kindly pro- vided access to his Leafhoppers of the World Database, which included much of the no- menclatural information incorporated into our Erythroneurini database. Unpublished drawings by L.W. Hepner included in this work are used with permission of the Mississippi Entomologi- cal Museum. Other previously published draw- ings reproduced in this work are in the public domain. Roland Muehlethaler and Dora Pombo provided constructive criticism that greatly improved the manuscript. This work was sup- ported in part by NSF grants DEB0315373 and DEB050529679, and Hatch award ILLU-875- 361 to CHD. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 237 REFERENCES Baker, C.F. 1903d. New Typhlocybini. Inverte- brata Pacifica. 1: 5–9. Baker, C.F. 1925b. Nomenclatorial notes on the Jassoidea, IV. Philippine J. Sci. 27: 537. Beamer, R.H. 1927a. New species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Canadian Entomologist. 59: 30–31. Beamer, R.H. 1929b. Erythroneura (Ho- moptera, Cicadellidae) from the Southwest. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America. 22(1): 115–129. Beamer, R.H. 1930a. Two Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) damaging apple in Kansas. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 3(2): 49–50. Beamer, R.H. 1931a. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 63: 127–135. Beamer, R.H. 1931b. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 63: 240–244. Beamer, R.H. 1931c. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 63: 268–270. Beamer, R.H. 1931d. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 63: 285–289. Beamer, R.H. 1932a. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 12–17. Beamer, R.H. 1932b. Erythroneura collected on apple with description of a new species. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 5(2): 62–64. Beamer, R.H. 1932c. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 45–48. Beamer, R.H. 1932d. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 69–72. Beamer, R.H. 1932e. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 82–88. Beamer, R.H. 1932f. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 134–144. Beamer, R.H. 1932g. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ca- nadian Entomologist. 64: 158–162. Beamer, R.H. 1932h. Some Erythroneura (grape leaf hoppers) of the maculata group (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Canadian Entomologist. 64: 174–181, 3 pl. Beamer, R.H. 1941a. Two new species of Erythroneura (Homoptera – Cicadel- lidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 14(1): 18–19. DeLong, D.M. 1916a. The leafhoppers or Jas- soidea of Tennessee. Bull. Tennessee St. Board Entomol. 5(2:17): 1–113. DeLong, D.M. 1918b. Additional records of Tennessee Cicadellidae (Hemiptera- Homoptera). Ohio J. Sci. 18: 233–242. DeLong, D.M., Caldwell, J.S. 1937c. Check list of the Cicadellidae (Homoptera) of America, north of Mexico. Ohio: State University. IV+93 p. Dietrich, C.H., Dmitriev, D.A. 2006a. Re- view of the New World genera of the leafhopper tribe Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocy- binae). Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 37(5): I–IV, 119–190. Dietrich, C.H., Dmitriev, D.A. 2007a. Revi- sion of the New World leafhopper genus Neozygina Dietrich & Dmitriev (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybi- nae: Erythroneurini). Zootaxa. 1475: 27–42. Dietrich, C.H., Dmitriev, D.A. 2008a. Review of the species of New World Eryth- roneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). II. Genus Zyginama. Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 38(3): I–IV, 129–176. Dmitriev, D.A. 2006a. 3I, a new program for creating Internet-accessible interactive keys and taxonomic databases and its application for taxonomy of Cicadina (Homoptera). Rus. Entomol. J. 15(3): 263–268. Dmitriev, D.A., Dietrich, C.H. 2003 onward, Web-site: Erythroneurini database. Http://ctap.inhs.uiuc.edu/dmitriev/ Vol. 39 Art.3238 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Dmitriev, D.A., Dietrich, C.H. 2006a. Nomen- clatural changes and notes in the tribe Erythroneurini (Homoptera: Cicadel- lidae: Typhlocybinae). Zootaxa. 1120: 35–39. Dmitriev, D.A., Dietrich, C.H. 2007a. Review of the New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybi- nae). I. Genera Erythroneura, Eras- moneura, Rossmoneura, and Hymetta. Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 38(2): I–V, 59–128. Dmitriev, D.A., Dietrich, C.H. 2008a. Rapid taxonomic revisions using Internet- integrated relational databases: an example using Erythroneura (sensu lato). Bull. Insectology. 61(1): 113– 114. Dmitriev, D.A., Dietrich, C.H. 2009a. Review of the New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocy- binae). III. Genus Erythridula. Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 38(6): I–IV, 215–334. Fattig, P.W. 1955a. The Cicadellidae or leaf hoppers of Georgia. Bull. Emory Univ. Mus. 11: 1–68. Ferrari, P.M. 1882a. Cicadaria Agri Ligustici. Ann. Mus. Genova. 18: 75–165. Fitch, A. 1851a. Catalogue with references and descriptions of the insects collected and arranged for the State Cabinet of Natural History. Ann. Rpt. State Cab. Natur. Hist. 4: 43–69. Gillette, C.P. 1898a. American leaf-hoppers of the subfamily Typhlocybinae. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 20(1138): 709–773. Glover, T. 1877a. Homoptera. In Report of the entomologist and curator of the mu- seum. Commr. Agr. Rpt. 1876: 17–46. Hamilton, K.G.A. 1985a. Leafhoppers of orna- mental and fruit trees in Canada. Agr. Canada Publ. 1779E: 1–71. Hepner, L.W. 1966a. Twenty species of Erythroneura related to E. bigemina (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 39(1): 78–89. Hepner, L.W. 1966b. New species of Eryth- roneura related to lenta (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Florida Entomologist. 49(2): 95–100. Hepner, L.W. 1966c. New species of Eryth- roneura (Cicadellidae) related to inepta. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 1(4): 1–5. Hepner, L.W. 1966d. New species of Eryth- roneura related to campora (Ho- moptera: Cicadellidae). Florida Entomologist. 49(2): 101–106. Hepner, L.W. 1967a. New species of Eryth- roneura related to E. dira (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 40(1): 17–24. Hepner, L.W. 1967b. New species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Entomol. News. 78(3): 59–73. Hepner, L.W. 1969a. New species of Eryth- roneura from oaks and hickories (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 42(2): 126–133. Hepner, L.W. 1972a. Five new species of Erythroneura (Homoptera: Cicadel- lidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 45(4): 430–433. Hepner, L.W. 1972b. A new species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and some characteristics of the nymph. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 7(3): 216–218. Hepner, L.W. 1972c. New species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Florida Entomologist. 55(4): 267–272. Hepner, L.W. 1973a. New species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 46(2): 184–186. Hepner, L.W. 1975a. New species of Eryth- roneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 48(1): 4–7. Herrich-Schäffer, G.A.W. 1838c. Jassus preys- sleri, Bythoscopus microcephalus, Typhlocyba quercus, T. nitidula, T. albostriella, T. adspersa, T. scutel- laris, T. viridula, T. cruenta, Tet- tigonia nigrolineata, Jassus lineatus, Eupelix spathulata, Jassus 6-notatus. Deutschlands Insecten. 164: 7–21. [ICZN] (1999). International code of zoo- logical nomenclature. London: Intern. Trust Zool. Nomenclature. 4th ed. XXIX+306 p. Johnson, D.M. 1935a. Leafhoppers of Ohio. Subfamily Typhlocybinae (Ho- moptera: Cicadellidae). Bull. Ohio Biol. Surv. 31: 39–122. Knull, D.J. 1944b. Nomenclatorial notes on Cicadellidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America. 37: 123. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 239 Knull, D.J. 1945b. Eleven new leafhoppers with notes on others (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 45(3): 103–110. Knull, D.J. 1949a. New leafhoppers from the United States (Homoptera: Cicadelli- dae). Ohio J. Sci. 49: 119–126. Knull, D.J. 1951a. Additions to list of Ohio leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadelli- dae). Ohio J. Sci. 51: 16. Knull, D.J. 1951b. Sixteen new leafhoppers and notes (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 51(4): 169–178. Knull, D.J. 1954b. New Erythroneura (Era- toneura) of the dira group with notes (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 54(3): 170–174. Knull, D.J. 1955a. Some new texan Eryth- roneura (Eratoneura) of the dira group (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 55(4): 245–246. Knull, D.J., Auten, M. 1937a. Some Eryth- roneura of the maculata group from Decatur, Georgia (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America. 30: 572–578. Knull, D.J., Auten, M. 1938b. Omissions and errors. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America. 31: 651. Lawson, P.B. 1920a. The Cicadellidae of Kan- sas. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 12: 5–306. Leonard, M.D. 1928a. Families Cercopidae, Membracidae, and Cicadellidae. In A list of the insects of New York, with a list of the spiders and certain other allied groups. Mem. N.Y. (Cornel) Agr. Expt. Sta. 101: 1–1121. Maw, H.E.L., Foottit, R.G., Hamilton, K.G.A., Scudder, G.G.E. 2000a. Checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska. Canada, Ontario, Ottawa: NRC Re- search Press. VIII+220 p. McAtee, W.L. 1920a. Key to the Nearctic species and varieties of Erythroneura (Homoptera; Eupterygidae). Trans. American Entomol. Soc. 46: 267–321, pl. XII. McAtee, W.L. 1924c. Notes on eupterygid leaf- hoppers with descriptions of a few forms (Homoptera). Florida Ento- mologist. 8(3–4): 33–39. McAtee, W.L. 1924d. Records of species of the genus Erythroneura (Homoptera; Eup- terygidae) with descriptions of new forms. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington. 37: 131–134. McAtee, W.L. 1924e. Notes on a collection of Erythroneura and Hymetta (Euptery- gidae) chiefly from Illinois, with de- scriptions of new forms. Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 15(2): 39–44. McAtee, W.L. 1926c. Notes on Homoptera from Illinois, with descriptions of new forms, chiefly Eupteryginae. Bull. Illi- nois Natur. Hist. Surv. 16(3): 127–136. Metcalf, Z.P. 1968a. General catalogue of the Homoptera. VI. Cicadelloidea. 17. Cicadellidae. Washington: US Dept. Agr. VII+1513 p. Nawa, U. 1913a. Zigina apicalis Mats. (Erythroneura apicalis Nawa). Insect World. 17: 480–486. Oman, P.W. 1949a. The Nearctic leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). A generic classification and check list. Mem. Washington Ent. Soc. 3: 1–253. Ribaut, H. 1936b. Homoptères Auchéno- rhynques. I. (Typhlocybidae). Faune de France. Paris: Lechevalier. 31: III+231 p. Robinson, W. 1924a. Some new species of Erythroneura (Homoptera, Cicadel- lidae). Canadian Entomologist. 56(3): 58–62. Robinson, W. 1924b. Additional new species of Erythroneura (Homoptera, Cicadel- lidae). Canadian Entomologist. 56: 154–157. Robinson, W. 1924c. Additional new species of Erythroneura (Homoptera, Cicadel- lidae). Canadian Entomologist. 56: 290–292. Robinson, W. 1926a. The genus Erythroneura north of Mexico (Homoptera, Cicadel- lidae). Kansas Univ. Sci. Bull. 16(3): 101–155. Ross, H.H. 1953b. Polyphyletic origin of the leafhopper fauna of Ilex decidua. Trans. Illinois Acad. Sci. 16: 186–192. Ross, H.H. 1956a. New nearctic species of Erythroneura (Homoptera: Cicadelli- dae). Entomol. News. 67(4): 85–90. Vol. 39 Art.3240 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Ross, H.H. 1957a. New oak-inhabiting spe- cies of Erythroneura from Illinois (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Entomol. News. 68: 183–190. Ross, H.H. 1957c. Principles of natural coexis- tence indicated by leafhopper popula- tions. Evolution. 11(2): 113–129. Ross, H.H. 1958a. Evidence suggesting a hybrid origin for certain leafhopper species. Evolution. 12(3): 337–346. Ross, H.H. 1958c. Further comments on niches and natural coexistence. Evolution. 12(11): 112–113. Ross, H.H., DeLong, D.M. 1950a. New species of Erythroneura of the maculata group (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 50(6): 291–296. Ross, H.H., DeLong, D.M. 1953a. Biological and taxonomic notes on Erythroneura (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 53(2): 77–90. Say, T. 1825a. Descriptions of new Hemipter- ous insects collected in the expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under command of Major Long. J. Acad. Natur. Sci. Philadelphia. 4: 307–345. Sinha, R.N., Beamer, R.H. 1954a. A new spe- cies of Erythroneura (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from Kansas. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 27(3): 105. Tollin, C. 1851a. Ueber Kleinzirpen, besonders über die Gattung Typhlocyba nebst Beschreibung einiger neuen Arten. Stettin. Ent. Ztg. 12: 67–74. Van Duzee, E.P. 1916a. Suborder Homoptera Latr. 1810. Section Auchenorhyncha A. & S. 1843. Check list of Hemiptera (excepting the Aphididae, Aleurodi- dae, and Coccidae) of America north of Mexico. 1916: I–XI, 1–111. Van Duzee, E.P. 1917b. Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America north of Mexi- co excepting the Aphididae, Coccidae, and Aleurodidae. Tech. Bull. Califor- nia Agr. Expt. Sta. 2: I–XIV, 1–902. Van Duzee, E.P. 1924a. The genus Erythroneu- ra in California (Homoptera). Proc. California Acad. Sci. (4). 13(13): 231–236. Walsh, B.D. 1862a. Fire blight. Two new foes of the apple and pear. Prairie Farmer. (N.S.). 10: 147–149. Wirtner, P.M. 1904a. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of western Pennsylvania. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 3: 183–232. Young, D.A. 1952b. A reclassification of West- ern Hemisphere Typhlocybinae (Ho- moptera, Cicadellidae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 35(1:1): 3–217. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 241 APPENdIx I # Species Museums INHS OSU KSEM MEM CNC USNM CAS CSUC 1 E. dira (Beamer) 45 127 55 73 113 6 2 E. gillettei (Beamer) 1 11 3 1 3 E. imbricariae (Ross & DeLong) 44 2 2 4 E. lamucata (Ross & DeLong) 30 3 5 E. maculata (Gillette) 78 44 18 88 12 4 6 E. eversi (Ross & DeLong) 16 3 22 7 7 E. noncuspidis (Beamer) 7 4 56 75 4 8 E. teshi (Hepner) 1 22 2 9 E. osborni (DeLong) 85 45 27 365 5 3 10 E. sandersoni (Ross) 3 2 11 E. crinita (Beamer) 1 3 10 3 1 12 E. andersoni (Beamer) 1 82 3 13 E. paraesculi (Knull) 1 27 2 2 14 E. tammina (Ross & DeLong) 3 655 15 E. texana (Beamer) 5 16 E. separata (Beamer) 37 28 19 60 4 3 17 E. curvata (Beamer) 221 49 74 554 18 E. restricta (Beamer) 120 114 16 282 48 4 19 E. impar (Beamer) 26 55 157 2 20 E. carmini (Beamer) 233 210 99 3834 112 2 21 E. forfex (Beamer) 41 20 2 12 1 22 E. linea (Beamer) 1 2 11 193 8 23 E. rangifer (Ross & DeLong) 4 5 18 24 E. dimidiata (Knull) 4 6 43 25 E. sanctaerosae (Hepner) 1 1 26 E. betulae sp.n. 1 2 1 27 E. concisa (Beamer) 25 50 35 59 2 7 28 E. spala (Ross & DeLong) 73 45 29 E. harpola (Ross) 3 3 47 30 E. minor (Beamer) 149 15 5 304 22 1 31 E. aesculi (Beamer) 1 97 243 8 32 E. bifida (Beamer) 1 37 27 33 E. aculeata (Beamer) 7 15 7 65 2 34 E. lusoria (Van Duzee) 3 4 114 4 6 22 35 E. pyra (McAtee) 56 87 2 11 1 36 E. millsi (Ross & DeLong) 5 12 1624 1 37 E. longifurca (Hepner) 1 2 3 38 E. manus (Beamer) 47 21 8 258 4 39 E. staffordi (Hepner) 1 1 40 E. ardens (McAtee) 165 194 30 425 8 2 1 41 E. uvaldeana (Knull) 23 2 42 E. inepta (Beamer) 11 16 9 792 8 43 E. firma (Beamer) 111 11 9 938 1 14 44 E. bispinosa (Beamer) 51 47 51 697 4 4 45 E. hyalina (Knull & Auten) 1 46 E. harnedi (Hepner) 14 4 2 47 E. unica (Beamer) 92 32 12 246 1 1 48 E. mira (Beamer) 39 62 44 389 8 49 E. facota (Beamer) 17 1 50 E. cristata (Knull) 1 1 98 25 2 51 E. mcateei sp.n. 141 46 52 E. ungulata (Beamer) 11 2 8 68 53 E. distincta (Knull & Auten) 2 1 10 4 54 E. spinea (Knull) 2 6 55 E. rotunda (Beamer) 172 30 7 5 56 E. nigriventer (Beamer) 1 2 6 32 1 57 E. stupkaorum (Knull) 2 14 2 58 E. usitata (Beamer) 274 43 14 1186 1 59 E. incondita (Beamer) 31 2 6 4 60 E. ingrata (Beamer) 58 10 7 84 61 E. arenosa (Ross & DeLong) 32 1 62 E. uncinata (Beamer) 13 17 8 192 2 63 E. arpegia (Ross) 12 5 64 E. propria (Beamer) 3 25 36 163 4 1 The table shows the number of studied specimens from each collection. See "Material and Methods" for the museum ab- breviations. Collections and Studied Material1 Vol. 39 Art.3242 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin # Species Museums INHS OSU KSEM MEM CNC USNM CAS CSUC 65 E. brevipes (Beamer) 153 11 29 263 4 66 E. turgida (Beamer) 71 22 25 361 1 67 E. delongi (Knull & Auten) 58 7 6 202 2 68 E. immota (Beamer) 6 7 353 69 E. tantilla (Beamer) 21 13 14 49 2 6 70 E. sorota (Hepner) 1 33 2 71 E. solita (Beamer) 15 2 7 1 7 72 E. knullae (Ross) 57 4 400 1 6 73 E. omani (Beamer) 36 2 117 12 10 74 E. mimica (Ross) 4 2 2 75 E. sancta (Beamer) 12 4 13 25 2 76 E. inksana (Knull) 8 40 1 77 E. alloplana (Ross) 7 94 78 E. parva (Beamer) 37 37 24 1216 1 79 E. mirifica (Beamer) 48 23 7 31 7 80 E. abjecta (Beamer) 6 51 9 5 30 7 81 E. hartii (Gillette) 100 92 43 4 5 2 82 E. misera (Beamer) 3 3 6 271 173 1 83 E. nevadensis (Beamer) 17 2 84 E. lata (Beamer) 8 32 13 94 3 85 E. levecki (Hepner) 1 19 1 86 E. tantula (Knull) 1 1 1 87 E. beeri (Hepner) 5 1 2 2 88 E. accita (Knull) 3 89 E. cera (Hepner) 1 1 90 E. rubraza (Robinson) 10 91 E. affinis (Fitch) 109 82 10 1249 9 4 92 E. stephensoni (Beamer) 3 11 54 77 93 E. clavipes (Beamer) 14 13 12 213 94 E. retusa (Beamer) 1 2 19 8 4 95 E. hymac (Robinson) 22 9 29 7 96 E. externa (Beamer) 12 10 8 16 97 E. brooki (Hepner) 1 1 2 98 E. longa (Knull) 19 3 1767 99 E. sebringensis (Hepner) 1 71 3 100 E. parvipes (Beamer) 17 2 11 35 101 E. calamitosa (Beamer) 29 22 24 123 3 102 E. richardsi (Ross) 27 25 2 103 E. marilandicae (Ross) 26 55 104 E. opulenta (Beamer) 64 3 2 105 E. era (McAtee) 6 2 30 139 5 106 E. fergersoni (Hepner) 2 33 1 107 E. ellisi (Hepner) 2 309 4 108 E. acantha (Ross & DeLong) 46 1 2347 109 E. interna (Beamer) 8 15 8 45 1 110 E. robusta (Knull) 1 17 12 1 111 E. metopia (Ross) 37 3 112 E. patris (Ross & DeLong) 16 1955 10 113 E. econa (Ross) 9 1 114 E. alicia (Ross) 15 2 115 E. zioni (Beamer) 11 116 E. greeni (Hepner) 1 5 1 117 E. lenta (Beamer) 50 48 16 347 41 3 118 E. gilesi (Hepner) 7 2386 13 119 E. maga (Knull) 14 22 1035 120 E. igella (Ross & DeLong) 5 16 605 3 121 E. stannardi (Hepner) 1 12 3 122 E. trautmanae (Knull) 73 21 7 56 123 E. knighti (Beamer) 77 40 24 203 124 E. triangulata (Beamer) 47 8 16 607 1 1 125 E. corylorubra (Knull) 6 18 7 126 E. fulleri (Hepner) 10 60 1 127 E. rubranotata (Beamer) 11 4 62 1 128 E. citrosa (Ross) 11 2 3 129 E. clara (Beamer) 3 7 9 118 2 130 E. nimia (Knull) 30 1 74 6 131 E. flexibilis (Knull) 50 12 20 3 132 E. certa (Beamer) 22 56 7 225 24 133 E. direpta (Knull) 22 71 42 2 134 E. tersa (Knull) 29 217 135 E. luculenta (Knull) 9 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 243 # Species Museums INHS OSU KSEM MEM CNC USNM CAS CSUC 136 E. fausta (Knull) 20 7 83 137 E. bella (McAtee) 81 30 5 75 5 1 138 E. coxi (Ross & DeLong) 79 1 2 13 50 139 E. torella (Robinson) 230 33 52 67 140 E. tumida (Knull) 6 3 4 15 141 E. glicilla (Ross) 3 5 142 E. morgani (DeLong) 200 108 77 50 143 E. arta (Beamer) 492 100 44 2090 6 144 E. hymettana (Knull) 2 4 23 145 E. lawsoni (Robinson) 851 317 15 237 14 146 E. continua (Knull & Auten) 4 147 E. valida (Knull) 1 9 148 E. pamelae (Hepner) 2 346 6 149 E. protuma (Ross) 8 2 150 E. havana (Ross & DeLong) 6 8 151 E. gemoides (Ross) 66 26 3 152 E. gemina (McAtee) 83 52 36 2083 22 18 153 E. malaca (Knull) 22 154 E. penesica (Beamer) 40 30 17 940 5 4 155 E. parallela (McAtee) 6 44 8 47 1 156 E. severini (Knull) 7 157 E. claroides (Hepner) 2 1 1 158 E. lunata (McAtee) 29 23 25 163 159 E. adunca (Beamer) 40 116 54 1695 6 160 E. curta (Beamer) 18 33 12 358 10 161 E. ballista (Beamer) 25 9 4 44 1 162 E. rostrata (Beamer) 6 29 6 56 1 163 E. penerostrata (Beamer) 8 1 5 137 164 E. emquu (Ross & DeLong) 3 122 165 E. trivittata (Robinson) 94 24 5 116 2 166 E. anseri (Hepner) 2 112 3 167 E. stoveri (Ross & DeLong) 5 12 558 6 168 E. campora (Robinson) 365 711 156 1457 72 3 169 E. spinifera (Beamer) 15 11 14 41 1 3 170 E. comoides (Ross & DeLong) 5 216 171 E. confirmata (McAtee) 168 19 10 86 2 172 E. phellos (Ross & DeLong) 6 113 173 E. bigemina (McAtee) 14 83 56 1711 1 37 174 E. mensa (Beamer) 6 12 3 175 E. basilaris (Say) 359 216 40 796 85 8 5 176 E. micheneri (Hepner) 4 7 4 2 177 E. lucyae (Hepner) 3 67 6 178 E. guicei (Hepner) 60 15 2 179 E. lundi (Hepner) 1 2 180 E. marra (Beamer) 1 30 4 4 9 2 181 E. staminea (Knull) 2 861 182 E. unca (Knull) 1 111 5 183 E. dumosa (Beamer) 9 15 12 36 2 184 E. ligata (McAtee) 73 29 26 5 6 14 185 E. contracta (Beamer) 134 184 84 1041 2 186 E. vittata (Knull & Auten) 5 6 187 E. biramosa (Beamer) 2 52 1 188 E. smithi (Ross) 4 6 189 E. prolixa (Knull) 43 12 392 190 E. teres (Beamer) 19 15 7 34 191 E. amethica (Ross) 4 2 192 E. tenuitas (Knull) 30 1 2 193 E. haysensis (Hepner) 50 2 90 9 9 194 E. geronimoi (Knull) 95 2 195 E. macra (Beamer) 30 6 5 43 107 1 196 E. socia (Knull) 2 4 4 197 E. accola (McAtee) 41 5 20 101 6 Vol. 39 Art.3244 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin APPENdIx II Host Plant Index Acer sp. ........................ 107, 162, 184, 185, 234 Acer pensylvanicum ..................................... 184 Acer rubrum ................................................. 118 Acer saccharum .. 107, 121, 139, 140, 143, 153, 162, 185, 187, 190, 194, 234 Acer spicatum ............................................... 184 Aesculus sp. ...................110, 119, 122, 123, 193 Aesculus glabra ............................ 125, 187, 188 Betula sp. ...................................................... 116 Betula lutea .................................................. 119 Betula nigra ................................................. 141 Carpinus sp. ................................................. 101 Carpinus caroliniana .. 120, 124, 128, 158, 185, 192, 193, 198 Carya sp. ..................... 107, 147, 173, 206, 214 Carya aquatica ..................................... 147, 150 Carya carolinae-septentrionalis .................. 147 Carya glabra ........ 107, 147, 170, 206, 214, 231 Carya illinoinensis ............................... 107, 150 Carya leiodermis .................. 107, 173, 206, 214 Carya ovalis ................................................. 107 Carya ovata .. 107, 147, 150, 170, 173, 175, 206 Carya tomentosa . 107, 147, 170, 173, 206, 214, 215, 220 Castanea pumila .......................................... 108 Cercis canadensis ................................ 166, 189 Comptonia peregrina ................................... 207 Cornus florida .............................................. 159 Corylus sp. ................................................... 125 Corylus americana .......101, 104, 116, 117, 119, 120, 124, 144, 145, 186, 188 Crataegus sp. ............................................... 217 Crataegus mollis .......................................... 122 Cryptomeria japonica .................................. 148 Fagus grandifolia......................... 120, 124, 190 Hamamelis virginiana .................................. 224 Ilex decidua .................. 132, 216, 221, 226, 228 Juglans nigra ............................................... 170 Malus sp. ...................................................... 152 Malus ioensis ............................................... 158 Malus pumila ............................................... 158 Myrica cerifera ............................................ 213 Ostrya caroliniana ....................................... 120 Ostrya virginiana 101, 120, 121, 190, 193, 212, 224 Platanus occidentalis .. 142, 143, 195, 196, 198, 199, 200 Prunus lanata ............................................... 211 Prunus persica ............................................. 211 Prunus virginiana ........................................ 211 Quercus sp. ...........110, 114, 115, 127, 129, 131, 136, 137, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 161, 165, 167, 168, 169, 171, 172, 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 202, 204, 205, 209, 210, 213, 217, 225, 227, 229, 231, 233, 234, 236 Quercus alba 113, 115, 127, 134, 135, 136, 157, 160, 165, 175, 197, 203, 209, 210, 227 Quercus bicolor .................... 151, 156, 174, 236 Quercus chapmanii .............. 146, 166, 169, 176 Quercus coccinea ................................. 165, 183 Quercus falcata ... 110, 155, 167, 168, 175, 178, 181, 182, 183, 202, 210, 225, 236 Quercus imbricaria ..... 102, 134, 145, 172, 175, 177, 178, 179, 181, 214, 218, 232 Quercus laurifolia ........ 148, 149, 165, 174, 181 Quercus lyrata ......110, 114, 131, 152, 156, 171, 174, 182, 204, 205, 222, 231, 233 Quercus macrocarpa ....112, 114, 115, 147, 150, 151, 156, 166, 167, 174, 223, 224, 227, 231, 233, 236 Quercus marilandica ... 127, 137, 146, 147, 155, 165, 167, 172, 175, 203, 204, 210, 225, 230, 232 Quercus michauxii 110, 114, 130, 131, 231, 233 Quercus muehlenbergii ........................ 114, 231 Quercus myrtifolia ............... 146, 169, 176, 217 Quercus nigra ..... 147, 148, 149, 152, 168, 174, 175, 178, 181, 205, 213, 217 Quercus pagoda .. 114, 155, 168, 171, 174, 175, 178, 181, 182, 183, 202, 205, 209, 210, 225 Quercus palustris 148, 151, 152, 171, 178, 183, 204 Quercus phellos ... 149, 150, 165, 174, 175, 181, 205, 213, 217, 218 Quercus prinus .... 114, 131, 139, 146, 150, 155, 174, 230 Quercus rubra .............. 157, 172, 175, 181, 183 Quercus rubra var. ambigua 127, 153, 203, 220 Quercus shumardii ....... 165, 172, 175, 227, 230 Quercus stellata ...110, 114, 126, 127, 130, 131, 136, 138, 146, 147, 150, 154, 155, 166, 167, 168, 175, 176, 178, 182, 183, 202 Quercus velutina . 127, 157, 172, 175, 177, 202, 225 Rubus sp. ...................................................... 196 Salix sp. ........................................................ 234 Salix bebbiana .............................................. 234 Sassafras albidum ........................................ 191 Tilia americana .............................................111 Toxicodendron radicans ............... 103, 104, 105 Ulmus sp....................................... 168, 176, 233 Ulmus alata . 129, 132, 164, 193, 216, 220, 221, 228 Ulmus americana 129, 132, 164, 215, 216, 220, 221, 226, 228 Ulmus rubra 106, 129, 132, 161, 164, 165, 215, 216, 220, 221, 228 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 245 APPENdIx III Species Index (junior synonyms in italics; pages of individual species accounts in bold) abjecta Beamer ...................... 90, 157, 242, 252 acantha Ross & DeLong ........ 92, 175, 242, 254 accicurta Hepner ................................. 215, 216 accita Knull ............................ 90, 162, 242, 253 accola McAtee ..................... 100, 236, 243, 258 acericola Ross & DeLong ................... 153, 154 aculeata Beamer ..................... 86, 124, 241, 250 adunca Beamer .............. 97, 209, 210, 243, 256 aesculi Beamer ............... 86, 122, 123, 241, 250 affinis Fitch ......................... i, 91, 164, 242, 253 albiquera Hepner ......................................... 183 alevra Ross .................................................. 231 alicia Ross .............................. 93, 179, 242, 254 allecta McAtee .................................... 227, 257 alloplana Ross ........................ 90, 155, 242, 252 alveyi Hepner ............................................... 149 amboyensis Hepner ...................................... 149 amethica Ross ...................... 100, 232, 243, 258 andersoni Beamer .................. 84, 109, 241, 249 anseri Hepner ......................... 97, 214, 243, 256 apicalis DeLong .......................................... 219 apicalis Nawa ............................................... 219 ardens McAtee ............ i, 86, 128, 129, 241, 250 arenosa Ross & DeLong ........ 88, 144, 241, 251 arneri Hepner ...................................... 168, 253 arpegia Ross ................... 88, 145, 146, 241, 251 arta Beamer ............................ 95, 199, 243, 255 asymmetra Hepner ....................................... 164 atkinsoni Hepner .......................................... 149 bainteri Hepner .................................... 222, 223 ballista Beamer .......................97, 211, 243, 256 basilaris Say ........................... 99, 221, 243, 257 beeri Hepner .......................... 90, 161, 242, 253 bella McAtee ......................... 95, 195, 243, 255 betulae sp.n. ..............81, 85, 118, 119, 241, 250 bicurvata Hepner ......................................... 231 bifida Beamer ......................... 86, 123, 241, 250 bigemina McAtee .......... 98, 219, 220, 243, 257 billi Hepner .......................................... 219, 220 biramosa Beamer ........... 99, 229, 230, 243, 258 bispinosa Beamer ........... 87, 132, 133, 241, 251 blockeri Hepner ........................................... 151 brazzeli Hepner ............................................ 215 brendae Hepner ........................................... 192 brevipes Beamer ............ 89, 146, 147, 242, 252 brooki Hepner ........................ 91, 168, 242, 253 brucensis Hepner ......................................... 153 byersi Hepner ............................................... 173 caddoensis Hepner ....................................... 216 calamitosa Beamer ......... 92, 170, 171, 242, 253 californica Beamer ...................................... 124 callisoga Ross .............................................. 192 campora Robinson . 98, 100, 215, 216, 243, 256 carmini Beamer ...............85, 114, 115, 241, 249 caverna Hepner ............................................ 119 cavipierra Hepner ........................................ 154 cera Hepner .................... 91, 162, 163, 242, 253 certa Beamer .................. 95, 191, 192, 242, 255 chehawensis Hepner ............................. 177, 178 citrosa Ross ............................ 94, 188, 242, 255 clara Beamer .......................... 94, 189, 242, 255 claroides Hepner .................... 97, 208, 243, 256 clavipes Beamer ..................... 91, 165, 242, 253 codyi Hepner ................................................ 215 colmeri Hepner ............................................. 127 colvardi Hepner .................................... 181, 182 combesi Hepner ............................................ 131 comoides Ross & DeLong ..... 98, 217, 243, 257 compressa Knull & Auten ............................ 216 concisa Beamer ...............85, 119, 120, 241, 250 confirmata McAtee ................. 98, 218, 243, 257 consueta Beamer .................................. 119, 120 continua Knull & Auten ......... 96, 201, 243, 256 contracta Beamer ................... 99, 228, 243, 257 coryli Tollin .................................................. 124 coryli Van Duzee .......................................... 124 corylorubra Knull ................... 94, 186, 242, 254 coxi Ross & DeLong .............. 95, 196, 243, 255 crinita Beamer ........................ 84, 108, 241, 249 cristata Knull .................. 87, 136, 137, 241, 251 cunninghami Hepner .................................... 131 curta Beamer .......................... 97, 210, 243, 256 curtoides Hepner .......................................... 215 curvata Beamer .......................84, 112, 241, 249 custeri Hepner .............................................. 221 daltonorum Hepner ...................................... 221 deformata Hepner ........................................ 235 deklei Hepner ............................................... 101 delongi Knull & Auten ........... 89, 148, 242, 252 denmarki Hepner .......................................... 101 dimidiata Knull .......................85, 117, 241, 250 dira Beamer ................ 81, 82, 95, 101, 241, 249 direpta Knull .................. 95, 192, 193, 242, 255 distincta Knull & Auten ......... 87, 139, 241, 251 doeringae Hepner ......................................... 145 douglasi Hepner ........................................... 204 dulcis McAtee ...................................... 106, 249 dumosa Beamer .............. 99, 226, 227, 243, 257 Vol. 39 Art.3246 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin dura Knull .................................................... 200 econa Ross ............................. 93, 178, 242, 254 edeni Hepner ................................................ 189 ellisi Hepner ................... 92, 174, 175, 242, 254 emquu Ross & DeLong .......... 97, 213, 243, 256 era McAtee ....................... 92, 98, 173, 242, 254 eversi Ross & DeLong ... 83, 104, 105, 241, 249 externa Beamer ...................... 91, 167, 242, 253 facota Beamer ........................ 87, 136, 241, 251 fagusae Hepner ............................................ 189 fausta Knull .................... 95, 194, 195, 242, 255 fergersoni Hepner ................... 92, 174, 242, 254 ferrosa Hepner ............................................. 164 firma Beamer .................. 87, 131, 132, 241, 251 flexibilis Knull ............... 94, 190, 191, 242, 255 forfex Beamer .........................85, 115, 241, 249 freytagi Hepner .................................... 149, 150 fulleri Hepner ...................... i, 94, 187, 242, 255 gemina McAtee .............. 96, 204, 205, 243, 256 gemoides Ross ....................... 96, 204, 243, 256 geronimoi Knull ................... 100, 234, 243, 258 gilesi Hepner .................. 93, 181, 182, 242, 254 gillettei Beamer ...................... 83, 102, 241, 249 glicilla Ross .................... 95, 197, 198, 243, 255 greeni Hepner ......................... 93, 180, 242, 254 guicei Hepner ......................... 99, 223, 243, 257 hamneri Hepner ........................................... 181 harnedi Hepner ....................... 87, 134, 241, 251 harpola Ross ........................... 85, 121, 241, 250 hartii Gillette .................. 90, 157, 158, 242, 252 havana Ross & DeLong . 96, 203, 204, 243, 256 haysensis Hepner ................. 100, 233, 243, 258 hendersoni Hepner ....................................... 192 hepneri Dmitriev & Dietrich ........................ 189 hibernia Hepner ........................................... 219 hutchinsi Hepner .......................... 130, 131, 251 hyalina Knull & Auten ........... 87, 133, 241, 251 hymac Robinson ............. 91, 166, 167, 242, 253 hymettana Knull ............. 96, 199, 200, 243, 255 igella Ross & DeLong ............ 93, 183, 242, 254 imbricariae Ross & DeLong . 83, 102, 103, 241, 249 immota Beamer ...................... 89, 149, 242, 252 impar Beamer ..................84, 113, 114, 241, 249 incondita Beamer ................... 88, 143, 241, 251 inepta Beamer ................ 86, 130, 131, 241, 251 ingrata Beamer ............... 88, 143, 144, 241, 251 inksana Knull ......................... 90, 154, 242, 252 insolita McAtee .................................... 128, 250 interna Beamer ....................... 92, 176, 242, 254 johnsoni Hepner ........................................... 174 kansana Baker .............................................. 128 kirki Hepner ................................................. 155 knighti Beamer ....................... 94, 185, 242, 254 knullae Ross ................... 89, 151, 152, 242, 252 krameri Hepner ............................................ 206 kuiterti Hepner ............................................. 208 lamucata Ross & DeLong ...... 83, 103, 241, 249 larryi Hepner ................................................ 215 lata Beamer .................... 90, 159, 160, 242, 252 lawsoni Robinson ........... 96, 200, 201, 243, 256 lenta Beamer .................. 93, 180, 181, 242, 254 levecki Hepner ....................... 90, 160, 242, 252 ligata McAtee ................. 99, 227, 228, 243, 257 lillianae Hepner ........................................... 219 linea Beamer ...................85, 115, 116, 241, 250 longa Knull ..................... 91, 168, 169, 242, 253 longifurca Hepner .......... 86, 126, 127, 241, 250 loriae Hepner ............................................... 197 lucora Hepner ...................................... 119, 120 luculenta Knull ....................... 95, 194, 242, 255 lucyae Hepner ................ 99, 222, 223, 243, 257 lunata McAtee ........................ 97, 209, 243, 256 lundi Hepner ........................... 99, 224, 243, 257 lusoria Van Duzee .......... 86, 124, 125, 241, 250 lyriquera Hepner .......................................... 204 macra Beamer .............. 100, 234, 235, 243, 258 maculata Gillette ............ 83, 103, 104, 241, 249 maga Knull ............................. 93, 182, 242, 254 malaca Knull .................. 96, 205, 206, 243, 256 manus Beamer ................ 86, 127, 137, 241, 250 marilandicae Ross .......... 92, 171, 172, 242, 253 mariquera Hepner ........................................ 215 marra Beamer ................. 99, 224, 225, 243, 257 masonae Knull ............................................. 219 maxwelli Hepner .......................................... 181 mcateei sp.n. ............. 81, 87, 137, 138, 241, 251 meadi Hepner ............................................... 219 mediana Robinson ....................................... 200 mensa Beamer ................ 98, 220, 221, 243, 257 metopia Ross .......................... 92, 177, 242, 254 micheneri Hepner ................... 99, 222, 243, 257 millsi Ross & DeLong ........... 86, 126, 241, 250 mimica Ross ........................... 89, 153, 242, 252 minor Beamer ......................... 86, 122, 241, 250 mira Beamer ........................... 87, 135, 241, 251 mirifica Beamer ...................... 90, 156, 242, 252 misera Beamer ....................... 90, 158, 242, 252 mitella McAtee ............................................. 218 morgani DeLong ......... i, 95, 198, 199, 243, 255 natchezensis Hepner ..................................... 200 nevadensis Beamer ................. 90, 159, 242, 252 nielsoni Hepner ............................................ 156 nigriquera Hepner ................................ 204, 205 nigriventer Beamer ................. 88, 141, 241, 251 nimia Knull .................... 94, 189, 190, 242, 255 noncuspidis Beamer ............... 83, 105, 241, 249 norica Ross .......................................... 232, 233 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 247 omani Beamer ........................ 89, 152, 242, 252 opulenta Beamer .................... 92, 172, 242, 254 ordinaria Knull & Auten .............................. 209 ordinaria Ribaut ........................................... 209 osborni DeLong ............. 83, 106, 107, 241, 249 ostryae Hepner ............................................. 189 pallida Knull & Auten ................................. 113 paluloides Ross ............................................ 148 pamelae Hepner ..................... 96, 202, 243, 256 paraesculi Knull ............. 84, 109, 110, 241, 249 parallela McAtee .................... 96, 207, 243, 256 parisensis Hepner ......................................... 235 parva Beamer ................. 90, 155, 156, 242, 252 parvipes Beamer ..................... 92, 170, 242, 253 patei Hepner ......................................... 187, 255 patriciae Hepner .......................................... 219 patris Ross & DeLong .... 92, 177, 178, 242, 254 paulae Hepner .............................................. 233 penerostrata Beamer ............... 97, 212, 243, 256 penesica Beamer .................... 96, 206, 243, 256 perplexa Knull ..................................... 209, 210 phellos Ross & DeLong . 98, 218, 219, 243, 257 pitrei Hepner ................................................ 232 priniquera Hepner ........................................ 139 prolixa Knull ................ 100, 230, 231, 243, 258 propria Beamer ....................... 89, 146, 241, 251 protuma Ross ......................... 96, 203, 243, 256 pumicasta Hepner ........................................ 151 pupillata McAtee ................................. 227, 257 pyra McAtee ........................ i, 86, 125, 241, 250 quercalbae Ross & DeLong ......................... 134 rangifer Ross & DeLong .85, 116, 117, 241, 250 ratcliffensis Hepner ...................................... 147 reedi Hepner ................................................. 204 reiteri Hepner ............................................... 219 restricta Beamer ......................84, 113, 241, 249 retusa Beamer ......................... 91, 166, 242, 253 richardsi Ross ......................... 92, 171, 242, 253 robinsoni Hepner .......................................... 219 robusta Knull .................. 92, 176, 177, 242, 254 rossi Hepner ................................................. 219 rostrata Beamer ...............97, 211, 212, 243, 256 rotunda Beamer ............. i, 88, 94, 140, 241, 251 rubida Knull ......................................... 164, 253 rubranotata Beamer ........ 94, 187, 188, 242, 255 rubrarta Hepner ........................................... 199 rubraza Robinson ................... 91, 163, 242, 253 rubulna Hepner ............................................ 221 sabita Sinha & Beamer ........................ 215, 216 sadleri Hepner ...................................... 176, 177 sancta Beamer ................ 89, 153, 154, 242, 252 sanctaerosae Hepner ................85, 118, 241, 250 sandersoni Ross .............. 83, 107, 108, 241, 249 schista Knull ................................................ 126 scobyensis Hepner ........................................ 171 scutellaris Gillette ........................................ 128 scutellaris Herrich-Schäffer ......................... 128 sebringensis Hepner ............... 91, 169, 242, 253 separata Beamer ..............84, 111, 112, 241, 249 septima Beamer ............................................ 209 sethi Hepner ................................................. 175 severini Knull ................. 96, 207, 208, 243, 256 shumiquera Hepner ...................................... 131 siloamensis Hepner ...................................... 101 simplex Ferrari ............................................. 209 simplex Knull & Auten ................................. 209 smithi Ross ........................... 100, 230, 243, 258 socia Knull ........................... 100, 235, 243, 258 solida Knull .................................................. 151 solita Beamer ......................... 89, 151, 242, 252 sorota Hepner ......................... 89, 150, 242, 252 spala Ross & DeLong ... 85, 119, 120, 121, 241, 250 spatulata Beamer .......................................... 189 spatulata Ross .............................................. 189 spinea Knull ................... 88, 139, 140, 241, 251 spinifera Beamer ............ 98, 216, 217, 243, 257 spiniterma Hepner ................................ 136, 137 staffordi Hepner ..................... 86, 128, 241, 250 staminea Knull ....................... 99, 225, 243, 257 stannardi Hepner ............ 93, 183, 184, 242, 254 starkvillensis Hepner .................................... 236 stephensoni Beamer ....... 91, 164, 165, 242, 253 stoveri Ross & DeLong .......... 98, 215, 243, 257 stupkaorum Knull ........... 88, 141, 142, 241, 251 tammina Ross & DeLong ........84, 110, 241, 249 tantilla Beamer ............... 89, 149, 150, 242, 252 tantula Knull ................... 90, 160, 161, 242, 252 tenilla Ross & DeLong ................................ 127 tenuitas Knull ............... 100, 232, 233, 243, 258 teres Beamer ......................... 100, 231, 243, 258 tersa Knull .............................. 95, 193, 242, 255 teshi Hepner ........................... 83, 106, 241, 249 texana Beamer .........................84, 111, 241, 249 thaxtoni Hepner .................................... 131, 132 torella Robinson ............. 95, 196, 197, 243, 255 trautmanae Knull .................... 93, 184, 242, 254 triangulata Beamer ......... 94, 185, 186, 242, 254 trivittata Robinson .......... 97, 213, 214, 243, 256 tumida Knull .......................... 95, 197, 243, 255 turgida Beamer ............... 89, 147, 148, 242, 252 unca Knull .............................. 99, 226, 243, 257 uncinata Beamer ..................... 88, 145, 241, 251 ungulata Beamer .................... 87, 138, 241, 251 unica Beamer ................. 87, 134, 135, 241, 251 univittata Robinson ...................................... 173 usitata Beamer ........................ 88, 142, 241, 251 uvaldeana Knull ............. 86, 129, 130, 241, 250 Vol. 39 Art.3248 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin vacua Knull .................................................. 155 valida Knull .................... 96, 201, 202, 243, 256 velox Ross ............................................ 131, 132 ventura Knull & Auten ................................. 158 vinsoni Hepner ............................................. 173 vittata Knull & Auten ............. 99, 229, 243, 258 vulgaris Hepner ............................................ 164 weemsi Hepner ............................................. 187 whitcombi Hepner ........................................ 160 wilsoni Hepner ............................................. 230 winslowensis Hepner .................................... 229 wisei Hepner ................................................. 181 wiyguli Hepner ............................................. 215 wolcottensis Hepner ..................................... 221 woodruffi Hepner ......................................... 124 youngi Hepner .............................................. 221 zioni Beamer .................. 93, 179, 180, 242, 254 Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 249 Plate 2. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. dira (Beamer); b – E. gillettei (Beamer), paratype; c – E. imbricariae (Ross & DeLong); d – E. lamucata (Ross & DeLong), holotype; e – E. macu- lata (Gillette); f – E. eversi (Ross & DeLong); g – E. noncuspidis (Beamer), paratype; h – E. teshi (Hepner); i – E. osborni (DeLong); i1 – holotype; i2 – color var. dulcis; j – E. sandersoni (Ross); k – E. crinita (Beamer), paratype; l1– l2 – E. andersoni (Beamer), color variations; m – E. paraes- culi (Knull); m1 – holotype; m2 – paratype; n – E. tammina (Ross & DeLong); o – E. texana (Beamer), paratype; p – E. separata (Beamer), paratype; q – E. curvata (Beamer); r – E. restricta (Beamer); s – E. impar (Beamer); t – E. carmini (Beamer); u – E. forfex (Beamer). IlluSTRATIoNS: Plates 2–11 Vol. 39 Art.3250 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Plate 3. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. linea (Beamer); b – E. rangifer (Ross & DeLong); c – E. dimidiata (Knull), holotype; d – E. sanctaerosae (Hepner), holotype; e – E. betulae sp.n., holotype; f – E. concisa (Beamer); g – E. spala (Ross & DeLong); h – E. harpola (Ross); i – E. minor (Beamer); j1–j2 – E. aesculi (Beamer), color variations; k – E. bifida (Beamer); l – E. aculeata (Beamer); m1–m2 – E. lusoria (Van Duzee), color variations; n – E. pyra (McAtee); o – E. millsi (Ross & DeLong); p – E. longifurca (Hepner); q – E. manus (Beamer); r – E. staffordi (Hepner), paratype; s1–s3 – E. ardens (McAtee), color variations; s3 – color var. insolita; t – E. uvaldeana (Knull), paratype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 251 Plate 4. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. inepta (Beamer); a2 – color var. hutchinsi; b – E. firma (Beamer); c – E. bispinosa (Beamer); d – E. hyalina (Knull & Auten), holotype; e – E. harnedi (Hepner), holotype; f – E. unica (Beamer); g – E. mira (Beamer); h – E. facota (Beamer), paratype; i – E. cristata (Knull); j – E. mcateei sp.n.; k – E. ungulata (Beamer); l – E. distincta (Knull & Auten); m – E. spinea (Knull); n – E. rotunda (Beamer); o – E. nigriventer (Beamer); p – E. stupkaorum (Knull), holotype; q – E. usitata (Beamer); r – E. incondita (Beamer); s – E. ingrata (Beamer); t – E. arenosa (Ross & DeLong); u – E. uncinata (Beamer); v – E. arpegia (Ross), paratype; w – E. propria (Beamer). Vol. 39 Art.3252 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Plate 5. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. brevipes (Beamer); b1–b2 – E. turgida (Beamer), color variations; c – E. delongi (Knull & Auten); d – E. immota (Beamer); e – E. tantilla (Beam- er); f – E. sorota (Hepner), holotype; g – E. solita (Beamer); h – E. knullae (Ross), paratype; i – E. omani (Beamer); j – E. mimica (Ross); k – E. sancta (Beamer), paratype; l – E. inksana (Knull), paratype; m – E. alloplana (Ross), paratype; n – E. parva (Beamer); o – E. mirifica (Beamer); p – E. abjecta (Beamer); q – E. hartii (Gillette); r1–r2 – E. misera (Beamer), color variations; s – E. nevadensis (Beamer), paratype; t – E. lata (Beamer); u – E. levecki (Hepner), paratype; v – E. tantula (Knull), holotype. Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 253 Plate 6. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. beeri (Hepner), holotype; b – E. accita (Knull), paratype; c – E. cera (Hepner), holotype; d – E. rubraza (Robinson); e1–e3 – E. affinis (Fitch), col- or variations; e3 – color var. rubida; f – E. stephensoni (Beamer); g – E. clavipes (Beamer); h – E. retusa (Beamer); i1–i2 – E. hymac (Robinson), color variations; j1–j2 – E. externa (Beamer), color variations; k – E. brooki (Hepner); l1–l2 – E. longa (Knull); l2 – holotype of E. arneri (Hepner); m – E. sebringensis (Hepner), paratype; n – E. parvipes (Beamer); o1–o2 – E. calamitosa (Beamer), color variations; p – E. richardsi (Ross), paratype; q – E. marilandicae (Ross). Vol. 39 Art.3254 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Plate 7. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. opulenta (Beamer), paratype; b1–b3 – E. era (McAtee), color variations; c – E. fergersoni (Hepner); d – E. ellisi (Hepner); e – E. acantha (Ross & DeLong); f – E. interna (Beamer); g – E. robusta (Knull), paratype; h – E. metopia (Ross), paratype; i – E. patris (Ross & DeLong); j – E. econa (Ross); k – E. alicia (Ross), paratype; l – E. zioni (Beamer), paratype; m – E. greeni (Hepner), paratype; n – E. lenta (Beamer); o – E. gilesi (Hepner); p – E. maga (Knull), paratype; q – E. igella (Ross & DeLong); r – E. stannardi (Hep- ner), holotype; s – E. trautmanae (Knull); t – E. knighti (Beamer); u – E. triangulata (Beamer); v – E. corylorubra (Knull), paratype. Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey I-Building 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, Illinois 61820 217-333-6880 ISBN 978-1-882932-24-5 5/17/10 10:18:14 AM Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 255 Plate 8. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a1–a2 – E. fulleri (Hepner); a2 – color var. patei; b1–b3 – E. rubranotata (Beamer), color variations; c – E. citrosa (Ross); d – E. clara (Beamer); e – E. nimia (Knull); f – E. flexibilis (Knull); g – E. certa (Beamer); h – E. direpta (Knull); i – E. tersa (Knull); j – E. luculenta (Knull), paratype; k – E. fausta (Knull), paratype; l – E. bella (McAtee); m – E. torella (Robinson); n1–n2 – E. coxi (Ross & DeLong), color variations; n2 – holotype; o – E. tumida (Knull); p – E. glicilla (Ross), holotype; q1–q2 – E. morgani (DeLong), color variations; r – E. arta (Beamer); s – E. hymettana (Knull), paratype. Vol. 39 Art.3256 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Plate 9. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. lawsoni (Robinson); b – E. continua (Knull & Auten), holotype; c – E. valida (Knull); d – E. pamelae (Hepner); e – E. protuma (Ross), holotype; f – E. havana (Ross & DeLong); g – E. gemoides (Ross), paratype; h – E. malaca (Knull); i1–i2 – E. gemina (McAtee), color variations; i2 – holotype; j – E. penesica (Beamer); k – E. paral- lela (McAtee), holotype; l – E. severini (Knull), paratype; m – E. claroides (Hepner), holotype; n – E. lunata (McAtee), allotype; o – E. adunca (Beamer); p – E. curta (Beamer), holotype; q – E. ballista (Beamer); r – E. rostrata (Beamer); s – E. penerostrata (Beamer); t – E. emquu (Ross & DeLong), paratype; u – E. trivittata (Robinson); v – E. anseri (Hepner), paratype; w – E. campora (Robinson). Review of the Species of New World Erythroneurini. IV. Genus EratoneuraJune 2010 257 Plate 10. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a1–a2 – E. stoveri (Ross & DeLong), color variations; b – E. spinifera (Beamer), paratype; c – E. comoides (Ross & DeLong), holotype; d – E. confirma- ta (McAtee); e – E. phellos (Ross & DeLong); f – E. bigemina (McAtee); g – E. mensa (Beamer); h1–h2 – E. basilaris (Say), color variations; h2 – neotype; i1–i2 – E. micheneri (Hepner), color variations; j – E. lucyae (Hepner); k – E. guicei (Hepner), paratype; l – E. lundi (Hepner), para- type; m – E. marra (Beamer), paratype; n – E. staminea (Knull); o1–o2 – E. unca (Knull), color variations; p – E. dumosa (Beamer); q1–q3 – E. ligata (McAtee), color variations; q1 – holotype; q2 – holotype of E. ligata var. allecta McAtee; q3 – holotype of E. ligata var. pupillata McAtee; r – E. contracta (Beamer). Vol. 39 Art.3258 Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin Plate 11. Habitus of Eratoneura species. a – E. vittata (Knull & Auten); b – E. bira- mosa (Beamer); c – E. smithi (Ross), paratype; d – E. prolixa (Knull); e – E. teres (Beamer); f – E. amethica (Ross), paratype; g – E. tenuitas (Knull); h – E. haysensis (Hepner); i – E. geronimoi (Knull), holotype; j – E. macra (Beamer); k – E. socia (Knull), holotype; l – E. accola (McAtee).