Bulletin STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY STEPHEN A. FORBES. Chef Vol. XVII. BULLETIN Article X. An Account of Changes in the Earthworm Fauna of Illinois AND A Description of One New Species BY FRANK SMITH PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS August. 1928 STATE OF ILLINOia DEPARTAIENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION A. M. SiiKLTON, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION A. M. Shelton, Chavman WiiJ.iAJi Trelease, Biology Heis'KY C. Cowles, Forestry Edson S. Bastin, Geology William A. Noyes, Chemistry John- W. Alvord, Engineering Charles M. Thompson, Representing the President of the University of Illinois THE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Stephen A. Forties, Chief ScHXEPP & Barnes. Pri.vters Springfield. Ill 1923 Volume XVH Article X AN ACCOUNT OF CHANGES IN THE EARTHWORM P^AUNA OF ILLINOIS AND A DESCRIPTION OF ONE NEW SPECIES* Frank Smith The contents of this paper include additions to the list of species previously recorded from Illinois and also furnish evidence of obvious changes in the earthworm fauna of one locality which are probably simi- lar to changes taking place in other parts of the state. The tendency is towards an increasing domination of European species and a correspond- ing decrease in the abundance of some indigenous forms. There are various records of similar modifications of the earthworm fauna in other parts of the world in which Europeans have settled and in which the European species of Lumbricid.\e have to a greater or less extent re- ])laced the indigenous species. Recent additions to the former lists of European species found in the state include Hclodrilus vcnctus hortcnsis ( Michaclsen ) , H. clilo- roticiis (Savigny), H. octacdnis (Savigny), and Liiiiibriais rnhcUus Hoffmeister. Additions to the list of indigenous species include Hclodri- lus bcddardi (Michaelsen) and H. heimhurgeri n. sp. During a period of over 30 years (1893-1927) the writer has been interested in Illinois earthworms and their distribution, partly because of their utilization in some of his instructional work and partly because of using them as objects of research leading to the publication of several papers on the subject. In connection with these activities numerous col- lecting and observation trips have been made in the vicinity of the Uni- versity of Illinois in order to obtain sjiecimens of the various kinds repre- sented and, incidentally, to learn something of their relative numbers and the kinds of situations in which representatives of the various species are most abundant. A comparison of the results of such trips made in earlier years of that period and those near its close shows that some marked changes have occurred. Some kinds found infrequently or not at all in the earlier years have become abundant in some areas in which there has been a corresponding decrease in other species. Increasing irregu- larities of distribution have been apparent which are presumably due to increased numbers of introduced forms which have not as yet had time to become abundant except in restricted areas. * Contributions from the Zoological Laljoi-atory of the University of Illinois No. 322. [347] 34S Ii.r.ixuis NATruAi. HisToitv SriivioY Bi'Llktin UPLAND-SOIL SPECIES The collecting and observation trips which involved ordinary npland- soil species have mostly been made immediately after rainfalls when large numbers of individuals of some species were crawling about on the surface or were sheltered under debris of various kinds and especially likely to be found on the sidewalks and along the curbing of paved streets. Actual digging for such forms has been restricted to small areas. The lack in the earlier years of a knowledge of the changes in the fauna which were to take place resulted in a failure to make records of dates and of luany numerical data which, if available, would have been very useful in the preparation of the present paper. The three species of Lumbricidae, listed under other names by Car- man (1888) as frequent or abundant in Champaign, Illinois, were Hclo- drilus foetidus (Savigny), hi. roscus (Savigny) and H. caUtjinosus trap- czoidcs (Duges). They were fotmd in similar abundance throughout the whole period of 1893-1927. Octolasiinu lacfcimi (Orley) was also of frequent occurrence throughout the same period, though not listed by Garman. H. lougicinctiis Smith and Gittins (1915) was found in limited numbers in a woodland of the vicinity of Urbana in 1901 and in consid- erable numbers in parkings and lawns of the city itself in 1910-1915, but has not been noticed since the latter date. The most interesting feature in the relations of the earthworms of the upland-soil localities that re- ceived attention, centered in the relations between Diphcardia commums Garman (1888) and Limibricns tcrrcstris Linnaeus, Miiller. Carman's description of the former species was based on material from the Cham- paign-Urbana region, and he states : "Hundreds were seen this spring in this locality, migrating during showers of rain." The same statement has been equally applicable to this species during the period 1893-1927, with the exceptions noted in certain following statements. The actual time of the first arrival of Luinhricus tcrrcstris in Illinois is very uncertain. Garman (1888) and Michaelsen (1900) in their lists of North American Oligochaeta refer to Eisen's (187-1) record of its occurrence in "New England'' but have no record farther west. The Motmt Lebanon, New England, of Eisen's record was actually in the eastern part of New York. The first definite record for Illinois is that of the writer published in 1900 and based on specimens found still earlier. The exact date is not known, but it was certainly before 1898 and prob- ably about 1896 that a few specimens were seen by the writer in a re- stricted locality in Champaign, crawling about during a rain storm. About the same date a workman engaged in digging a trench in an artificially forested area on the LTniversity campus ( locally known as the Arboretum ) found and gave to the writer a few specimens. These were the basis for the record mentioned above. During this period and for several years subsequently, it was necessary to send to dealers elsewhere for specimens needed for class work. Then came a time, not far from 1905, when specimens were sufficiently abundant in the Arboretum to meet some of the needs for material, but they had not spread in any appreciable num- EARTiiwoRii Fauna of Illixois 349 bers to other areas. Subsequently, the area within a few blocks of the campus became abundantly stocked with them, while specimens of Diplo- cardia coinniiinis became correspondingly infrequent. In the forenoon of ]klarch 19, 1927, following a rainy night, the writer traveled along the streets bordering an area of about one-half mile square adjacent to the east side of the campus in Urbana and found Lumbriciis tcrrcstris abundant in the streets bordering all of the 24 city blocks involved, while the total number of specimens of Dif^locardia com- ininiis seen was but 19, or an average of less than one per block—a marked contrast to conditions existing in the same region in earlier times when D. coiinuKiiis was abundant throughout and L. tcrrcstris was rarely seen. A trip on the following day through the area lying still farther east re- sulted in finding that D. coiiiiniiiiis was still abundant in a good deal of the territory covered and that L. tcrrcstris was abundant in only a few detached areas. Xo noticeable difference was found in the relative num- bers of smaller introduced European forms, such as Octolasiiiiii lactcuiii, Hclodrilus rosciis and H. caligiiiosus traf>ccoidcs. which were still abund- ant in both of the localities examined. The area in Champaign into which L. tcrrcstris has extended its distribution has also greatly increased in recent years. WOODLAXD SPECIES Xo observations have been made which would provide information concerning changes in relative abtmdance of the species that are more commonly represented in decaying tree trunks, under logs, and in masses of decaying leaves. Hclodrilus gicsclcri liciiipcli Smith (1915), H. sctcki Smith and Gittins (1915), and //. tenuis (Eisen) (ISTi) are such forms, and the writer is imaware of any notable changes having taken place during the past 30 years in their relative numbers, or of the appearance in such locations in recent years of introduced forms not previously found there. STREAM-BAXK SPECIES The stream which has been most easily accessible and from which most of the collections of stream-bank species have been obtained, is locally known as the Boneyard Branch of Salt Fork. It is a small stream, but a few yards wide, which originates a short distance north of Cham- paign and flows south through the northern part of that city and then east through the eastern part and through the city of Urbana, which lies adjacent, and then joins the Salt Fork in the outskirts of the latter city. Its course extends across the University campus in the western part of Urbana. During the period 1893-192T there have been extensive changes in the character of the water content and hence in the faima contained. Increasing sewage contamination, due to increasing population and inade- quate sewage disposal equipment in the two cities, of which it furnished the principal drainage outlet, gradually led to the elimination of all of its fauna except that which could exist under conditions similar to those of an open sewer. The earthworm fauna of the banks has necessarily been 350 Ilunois Natikal Histoky Survev Bt i.i.f.tix influenced by these changes. Such conditions reached a maximum at about the time (1922-1U23) that J. L, Hyatt, a graduate assistant, made an extensive series of collections of the earthworms inhabiting the soil in the banks of the stream in various parts of its course. Since that time the installation of a more adequate sewerage system and of a modern and eflicient sewage-disposal plant has greatly altered the conditions, and resulting changes in the fauna are already in progress. During the time of Mr. Hyatt's collecting activities there was great diversity in the degree of sewage contamination in different parts of the course of the stream. In the part lying north of Champaign and in the northern outskirts there was but little. In progressing down stream an observer would find con- tamination from the few factories, the streets, and other sources becom- ing inore and more evident, and the waters w-ere already laden with foul material before the eastern limits of Champaign w-ere reached. Still further additions were made in its course through the University campus and Urbana. A study of the earthworms collected from the banks of the stream in various locations showed correlated changes in the relative abundance of the representatives of the different species of earthworms. Certain indigenous species and most of the species common in the upland-soil regions were found in much greater numbers in the places of least con- tamination, and certain other introduced species reached their maximum abundance where contamination was very pronounced. Most of the com- mon upland species were represented in at least small numbers, and in addition about a half-dozen other species were represented which have not been found in the upland-soil locations. A very decided lack of uni- formity was found in collections made from different localities even when the conditions and degrees of contamination seemed similar. Some species had a rather limited area of distribution, indicating a relatively recent introduction into the region. The specimens collected were obtained by digging them from the soil of the banks of the stream, and they were then taken to the laboratory and fixed in a well-extended condition. The specimens were all pre- served for the sake of greater certainty in identification and also with a view to their use in other ways, including a search for abnormal speci- mens, of which a considerable number were found. Collections were made from 11 different locations, distributed along some four miles of the course of the stream, from the northern outskirts of Champaign to its junction with Salt Fork east of Urbana. Five of these locations were in Champaign and six in Urbana. For convenience they will be designated by the letters A to K, which will be applied to the locations in the order of their occurrence along the stream, beginning with the one nearest the source in the northern Champaign region. The number of collections in each location varied from one at A to twelve at F, but in most of them three or more collections were made from each, and the times of making the collections were distributed over parts of two years, 1922 and 1!)23. Unfortunately, no similar extensive series of collections had been made EARTinvoRir Fauna ok Illinois 351 in earlier years; hence, definite comparisons of the fauna with that of earlier years could not be made, with the exception of locations /•" and G, where collections had been made at various times in preceding years. One surprising result of a study of the collections by Mr. Hyatt was the discovery of the presence of a considerable number of specimens of Helodriltis vcnctiis hortcnsis, a European species which had been pre- viously recorded from North America only from California (Michaelsen, 1!100). Thirty-one specimens were collected at one spot in location P on .\pril lo, ]!)2"^, and a few had been found in neighboring locations in the preceding month. Still larger numbers were collected at location G in 1923. Since Mr. Hyatt had made collections at these two localities in 1!)21. and the writer also at various times in jireceding years had made collections in the same ]3laces without finding any representatives of this species, it seems reasonable to assume that a recent introduction into this region has occurred. Another unexpected result was the finding of large numbers of the species H. chloroticus. A single specimen had been found by Mr. Hyatt in October, 1921, which was the first record from the Boneyard Branch. It probably was taken at location F or G, where only eight specimens were found in the IG collections made in 1922 and 1923. I know of no record of careful collections prior to 1921 from the banks of the stream at loca- tion H and below, where Mr. Hyatt found several hundred specimens of H. chloroticus; hence, the supposition of a relatively recent introduction of this species has less supporting evidence. The only record of the species being found in Illinois ])rior to 1921, which is known to the writer, is that of a dead specimen found Sejjtember 12, 1918, by F. C. Baker while hunting mollusks in a shallow ])lace in the Salt Folk about nine miles east of Urbana. The waters of the stream where the specimen was found were carrying much sewage contamination received from the Bone- yard Branch at Urbana. An examination by the writer of the shores at a few points np stream from the place where the specimen was found, failed to disclose the presence of other specimens. Another species of which specimens were found to be most abundant in badly contaminated localities is H. SHbntbiciiiidiis (Eisen). It has been abundantly represented since 1911 but was not found during the first few years of the period beginning with 1893. The accompanying table shows the numbers and distribution of the siiecimens of the Hyatt collections and requires but little explanation. Locations A, B, and C were those which were most free from sewage contamination. The first vertical column of figures gives the total num- ber of collections made at each of the locations, the next one shows the total number of specimens from each location, and the following columns show the total numbers of specimens of each of the species as found at each of the stations. The lower part of the table contains footings show- ing the total numbers of specimens of each of the species represented. 352 Illinois NAxriiAL History Sukvky BuLLirriN In addition to these collections which were all from the banks of one stream, other collections were made in rivulets or ditches tributary to the stream, or in adjacent fields. The more pertinent features of a few of these will be mentioned. In a field near location A a collection of '^ M m ~ " 'c — 55 t-"°-"i£-£Sc Sa-5.2 5&5g2kSS^5g"5-5?i2-=|— a; H & S - S « ., S S & „, T, = S •S. „^ S 2 ^ ^ = -n .2 •= S 5 - £ „ 5 .5 .^ .2 - .=^ w QJ s :si^i-2|i .liiipg" s-ii2ii^s° "^''""° - ':3 360 Ii.i.ixoiw N-VTriiAL History Sihvky Bulletin them were 16 specimens belonging to H . fcfracdnis and two to the variety Iicrcyniiis. In eight of these specimens asymmetry is found, and in ten specimens the spermiducal pores are paired on somites other than 13 or 15. Sections were made of parts of these ten specimens and studied with the following results. In one specimen with spermiducal pores on 14, the clitellum, tubercula pubertatis, oviducal pores, spermathecal pores, gonads, sperm sacs, hearts, and calciferous gland were all found one somite anterior to the location normal in the variety hcrcyniiis. In each of three specimens with spermiducal ]3ores on 12, the various parts named above are located one somite anterior to the positions normal in H. tctnicdnts typicus. In four specimens with the spermiducal pores on 11, the other organs named are two somites anterior to the positions normal for specimens of that species. In one specimen with spermiducal pores on 10, the various other organs named, in so far as they are present, are three somites anterior to the normal positions. Only the three posterior pairs of hearts were recognized. In this specimen there are four sper- mathecae in 4-7 on one side and three in 5-T on the other side. The gen- eral appearance of a few anterior somites suggests strongly their having been regenerated. One specimen that at first glance with a lens showed spermiducal pores on 9 was found on more careful study to have lost some anterior somites (probably four) and had just begun regeneration for their replacement. Thus far the writer has not made a sufficiently care- ful study of the specimens with spermiducal pores on 11 or on 13 to pro- vide a basis for a satisfactory conclusion concerning the probable cause of such departures from the normal numerical relations—whether it may be due to injury and subsequent incomplete regeneration or to some other cause. H. venetus hortensis is given in the table as having a length of 4-10 cm. instead of the 3.5-5 cm. found in an earlier paper (Smith, 1917) and based on the statements of European writers. Specimens in the collec- tions studied by the writer included several that were 7-10 cm. in length. They had been anesthetized before fixation and were in a well-extended condition. Specimens of H . octacdrus from Norway, Colorado, and Illinois have been sectioned, and in them the writer has found hearts in 7-9 only. In specimens from Virginia no hearts have been found posterior to 10. In the other species of Lumbricidae listed the posterior pair of hearts is in 11. Specimens of H. tenuis are usually without spermathecae, but the writer (1917, p. 177) has reported specimens from Michigan and Indiana with spermathecae imperfectly developed or in reduced numbers (less than four), and more recently has found three specimens from Homer Park, Illinois, which also have spermathecae in reduced numbers or im- perfectly developed. EAiiTinvon.M Faina ok Illinois 361 GEXERIC XA.MES OF LU.MBRICIDAE There has been much confusion in the present century in the use of generic names for Luxibricidae. In 1845, Hoffnieister created a genus Hdodrihts for a species oculalus which he erroneously beHeved to differ from related forms in the absence of a clitellum in all stages of the life history. The related species were left in the genus Lumbricus. In 1ST4, Eisen separated the species of Lumbricus into four groups, leaving but few species in Lumbricus and creating three new genera : Allurus, Dendrobaena, and Allolobophora. Michaelsen, in a monographic paper (1900a) on Oligochaeta, replaced the name AUurus Eisen, which was jireoccupied, by the new name Eiseniella Michaelsen. He also substi- tuted the genus name Helodrilus Hoffnieister for Allolobophora Eisen, iLsing the latter name for a subgenus of Helodrilus. He felt that a strict adherence to certain rules of nomenclature, which he was obligated to follow, required such substitution. In this procedure he was followed by the majority.of writers of systematic papers dealing with Lumbricidae. During the past few years there has been a rather general tendency among various writers, including Michaelsen, to restore the ,genus Allolobophora and discard Helodrilus. Five groups—Eiseniella, Eisenia, Dedrobaena. Bimastus, and Eophila—are variously treated as distinct genera, or as subgenera of Helodrilus or of .-Mlolobo]5hora, depending on which of the latter happens to be recognized as a valid genus. Such diversities of terminology cause little inconvenience to the specialist familiar with the situation, but are naturally confusing to others. In the present paper the writer has preferred to follow the precedent .set in his earlier paper ( lOlT) based on Michaelsen's paper of 1010. The real need for a satisfactory system of nomenclature carefully followed is obvious. LITERATURE CITED The following list includes the papers to which direct references are made in the text. More extensive lists of the literature on Oi.igochakta will be found in the bibliographic lists in some of the papers here listed, especially in those of Beddard (1S95), Michaelsen (1900a and 1910). and of Smith (1917 and 1924). Br.i)i)Ani). P. E. 1S95. A Monograph of the Order of Oligochaeta. Oxford. COGXEITI DE MaRTILS, L. 1905. Lombrichi liguri del Museo civico di Genova. Ann. Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Genova. (3) 2:102-127. EisK.x, G. 1S74. Bidrag till Kannedomen om New Englands och Canadas Lumbri- cider. Ofv. Vet. Akad. Forh.. 31:41-49. Gar.max, H. 18SS. On the Anatomy and Histology of a New Earthworm (Diplocardia communis, gen. et sp. nov.). Bull. III. State Lab. Xat. Hist.. 3:47-77. Heijiijurgkr. H. V. 1915. Notes on Indiana Earthworms. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.. 1914. 362 iLUNOis Natural History Svrvk.y BuLurriN Laxgdox, Fanny E. 1895. The Sense Organs of Lumbricus agricola Hoffni. Jour, ilorph., 11:193-234. Michaelsex, W. 1900. Die Lumbriciden-Fauna Nordamerikas. Ahh. nat. Ver. Hamburg, 16:1-22. 1900a. Ollgochaeta. Das Tierreich, 10 Lief, xxix-575 pp. Berlin. 1910. Zur Kenntnis der Lumbriciden und Hirer Verbreitung. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersburg, 15:1-74. Moore, H. F. 1895. On the Structure of Bimastos palustris, a New Oligochaete. Jour. Morph., 10:473-496. Sjiitii, F. 1S95. A Preliminary Account of two New Oligochaeta from Illinois. Bull. III. State Lab. Xat. Hist., 4:138-148. 1900. Notes on Species of North American Oligochaeta.. III. List of Species found in Illinois, and Descriptions of Illinois Tubificidae. Bull. III. State Lab. Nat. Hist.. 5:441-458. 1915. Two New Varieties of Earthworms with a Key to described Species in Illinois. Bull. III. State Lab. Nat. Hist., 10:551-559. 1917. North American earthworms of the family Lumbricidae in the col- lections of the United States National Museum. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 52:157-182. 1924. The calciferous glands of Lumbricidae and Diplocardia. III. Biol. Monographs, 9:1-76. 1925. Certain Differences between Text-book Earthworms and Real Earth- worms. Trans. III. State Acad. Set., 17:78-83. Smith, F., and Gittiks, E. M. 1915. Two New Species of Lumbricidae from Illinois. Bull. III. State Lab. Nat. Hist., 10:545-550.